bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.2 → 6.0.0-alpha.21

package/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/instructions.md

@@ -1,252 +0,0 @@
-# Create Story - Workflow Instructions (Spec-compliant, non-interactive by default)
-
-````xml
-<critical>The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project_root}/bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml</critical>
-<critical>You MUST have already loaded and processed: {installed_path}/workflow.yaml</critical>
-<critical>Generate all documents in {document_output_language}</critical>
-<critical>This workflow creates or updates the next user story from epics/PRD and architecture context, saving to the configured stories directory and optionally invoking Story Context.</critical>
-<critical>DOCUMENT OUTPUT: Concise, technical, actionable story specifications. Use tables/lists for acceptance criteria and tasks.</critical>
-
-<workflow>
-
-  <step n="1" goal="Load config and initialize">
-    <action>Resolve variables from config_source: story_dir (dev_story_location), output_folder, user_name, communication_language. If story_dir missing and {{non_interactive}} == false → ASK user to provide a stories directory and update variable. If {{non_interactive}} == true and missing, HALT with a clear message.</action>
-    <action>Create {{story_dir}} if it does not exist</action>
-    <action>Resolve installed component paths from workflow.yaml: template, instructions, validation</action>
-    <action>Resolve recommended inputs if present: epics_file, prd_file, architecture_file</action>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="2" goal="Discover and load source documents">
-    <critical>PREVIOUS STORY CONTINUITY: Essential for maintaining context and learning from prior development</critical>
-
-    <action>Find the previous completed story to extract dev agent learnings and review findings:
-      1. Load {{output_folder}}/sprint-status.yaml COMPLETELY
-      2. Find current {{story_key}} in development_status section
-      3. Identify the story entry IMMEDIATELY ABOVE current story (previous row in file order)
-      4. If previous story exists:
-         - Extract {{previous_story_key}}
-         - Check previous story status (done, in-progress, review, etc.)
-         - If status is "done", "review", or "in-progress" (has some completion):
-           * Construct path: {{story_dir}}/{{previous_story_key}}.md
-           * Load the COMPLETE previous story file
-           * Parse ALL sections comprehensively:
-
-             A) Dev Agent Record → Completion Notes List:
-                - New patterns/services created (to reuse, not recreate)
-                - Architectural deviations or decisions made
-                - Technical debt deferred to future stories
-                - Warnings or recommendations for next story
-                - Interfaces/methods created for reuse
-
-             B) Dev Agent Record → Debug Log References:
-                - Issues encountered and solutions
-                - Gotchas or unexpected challenges
-                - Workarounds applied
-
-             C) Dev Agent Record → File List:
-                - Files created (NEW) - understand new capabilities
-                - Files modified (MODIFIED) - track evolving components
-                - Files deleted (DELETED) - removed functionality
-
-             D) Dev Notes:
-                - Any "future story" notes or TODOs
-                - Patterns established
-                - Constraints discovered
-
-             E) Senior Developer Review (AI) section (if present):
-                - Review outcome (Approve/Changes Requested/Blocked)
-                - Unresolved action items (unchecked [ ] items)
-                - Key findings that might affect this story
-                - Architectural concerns raised
-
-             F) Senior Developer Review → Action Items (if present):
-                - Check for unchecked [ ] items still pending
-                - Note any systemic issues that apply to multiple stories
-
-             G) Review Follow-ups (AI) tasks (if present):
-                - Check for unchecked [ ] review tasks still pending
-                - Determine if they're epic-wide concerns
-
-             H) Story Status:
-                - If "review" or "in-progress" - incomplete, note what's pending
-                - If "done" - confirmed complete
-           * Store ALL findings as {{previous_story_learnings}} with structure:
-             - new_files: [list]
-             - modified_files: [list]
-             - new_services: [list with descriptions]
-             - architectural_decisions: [list]
-             - technical_debt: [list]
-             - warnings_for_next: [list]
-             - review_findings: [list if review exists]
-             - pending_items: [list of unchecked action items]
-         - If status is "backlog" or "drafted":
-           * Set {{previous_story_learnings}} = "Previous story not yet implemented"
-      5. If no previous story exists (first story in epic):
-         - Set {{previous_story_learnings}} = "First story in epic - no predecessor context"
-    </action>
-
-    <action>If {{tech_spec_file}} empty: derive from {{tech_spec_glob_template}} with {{epic_num}} and search {{tech_spec_search_dir}} recursively. If multiple, pick most recent by modified time.</action>
-    <action>Build a prioritized document set for this epic:
-      1) tech_spec_file (epic-scoped)
-      2) epics_file (acceptance criteria and breakdown)
-      3) prd_file (business requirements and constraints)
-      4) architecture_file (architecture constraints)
-      5) Architecture docs under docs/ and output_folder/: tech-stack.md, unified-project-structure.md, coding-standards.md, testing-strategy.md, backend-architecture.md, frontend-architecture.md, data-models.md, database-schema.md, rest-api-spec.md, external-apis.md (include if present)
-    </action>
-    <action>READ COMPLETE FILES for all items found in the prioritized set. Store content and paths for citation.</action>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="3" goal="Find next backlog story to draft" tag="sprint-status">
-    <critical>MUST read COMPLETE sprint-status.yaml file from start to end to preserve order</critical>
-    <action>Load the FULL file: {{output_folder}}/sprint-status.yaml</action>
-    <action>Read ALL lines from beginning to end - do not skip any content</action>
-    <action>Parse the development_status section completely to understand story order</action>
-
-    <action>Find the FIRST story (by reading in order from top to bottom) where:
-      - Key matches pattern: number-number-name (e.g., "1-2-user-auth")
-      - NOT an epic key (epic-X) or retrospective (epic-X-retrospective)
-      - Status value equals "backlog"
-    </action>
-
-    <check if="no backlog story found">
-      <output>📋 No backlog stories found in sprint-status.yaml
-
-All stories are either already drafted or completed.
-
-**Options:**
-1. Run sprint-planning to refresh story tracking
-2. Load PM agent and run correct-course to add more stories
-3. Check if current sprint is complete
-      </output>
-      <action>HALT</action>
-    </check>
-
-    <action>Extract from found story key (e.g., "1-2-user-authentication"):
-      - epic_num: first number before dash (e.g., "1")
-      - story_num: second number after first dash (e.g., "2")
-      - story_title: remainder after second dash (e.g., "user-authentication")
-    </action>
-    <action>Set {{story_id}} = "{{epic_num}}.{{story_num}}"</action>
-    <action>Store story_key for later use (e.g., "1-2-user-authentication")</action>
-
-    <action>Verify story is enumerated in {{epics_file}}. If not found, HALT with message:</action>
-    <action>"Story {{story_key}} not found in epics.md. Please load PM agent and run correct-course to sync epics, then rerun create-story."</action>
-
-    <action>Check if story file already exists at expected path in {{story_dir}}</action>
-    <check if="story file exists">
-      <output>ℹ️ Story file already exists: {{story_file_path}}
-
-Will update existing story file rather than creating new one.
-      </output>
-      <action>Set update_mode = true</action>
-    </check>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="4" goal="Extract requirements and derive story statement">
-    <action>From tech_spec_file (preferred) or epics_file: extract epic {{epic_num}} title/summary, acceptance criteria for the next story, and any component references. If not present, fall back to PRD sections mapping to this epic/story.</action>
-    <action>From architecture and architecture docs: extract constraints, patterns, component boundaries, and testing guidance relevant to the extracted ACs. ONLY capture information that directly informs implementation of this story.</action>
-    <action>Derive a clear user story statement (role, action, benefit) grounded strictly in the above sources. If ambiguous and {{non_interactive}} == false → ASK user to clarify. If {{non_interactive}} == true → generate the best grounded statement WITHOUT inventing domain facts.</action>
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">requirements_context_summary</template-output>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="5" goal="Project structure alignment and lessons learned">
-    <action>Review {{previous_story_learnings}} and extract actionable intelligence:
-      - New patterns/services created → Note for reuse (DO NOT recreate)
-      - Architectural deviations → Understand and maintain consistency
-      - Technical debt items → Assess if this story should address them
-      - Files modified → Understand current state of evolving components
-      - Warnings/recommendations → Apply to this story's approach
-      - Review findings → Learn from issues found in previous story
-      - Pending action items → Determine if epic-wide concerns affect this story
-    </action>
-
-    <action>If unified-project-structure.md present: align expected file paths, module names, and component locations; note any potential conflicts.</action>
-
-    <action>Cross-reference {{previous_story_learnings}}.new_files with project structure to understand where new capabilities are located.</action>
-
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">structure_alignment_summary</template-output>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="6" goal="Assemble acceptance criteria and tasks">
-    <action>Assemble acceptance criteria list from tech_spec or epics. If gaps exist, derive minimal, testable criteria from PRD verbatim phrasing (NO invention).</action>
-    <action>Create tasks/subtasks directly mapped to ACs. Include explicit testing subtasks per testing-strategy and existing tests framework. Cite architecture/source documents for any technical mandates.</action>
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">acceptance_criteria</template-output>
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">tasks_subtasks</template-output>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="7" goal="Create or update story document">
-    <action>Resolve output path: {default_output_file} using current {{epic_num}} and {{story_num}}. If targeting an existing story for update, use its path.</action>
-    <action>Initialize from template.md if creating a new file; otherwise load existing file for edit.</action>
-    <action>Compute a concise story_title from epic/story context; if missing, synthesize from PRD feature name and epic number.</action>
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">story_header</template-output>
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">story_body</template-output>
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">dev_notes_with_citations</template-output>
-
-    <action>If {{previous_story_learnings}} contains actionable items (not "First story" or "not yet implemented"):
-      - Add "Learnings from Previous Story" subsection to Dev Notes
-      - Include relevant completion notes, new files/patterns, deviations
-      - Cite previous story file as reference [Source: stories/{{previous_story_key}}.md]
-      - Highlight interfaces/services to REUSE (not recreate)
-      - Note any technical debt to address in this story
-      - List pending review items that affect this story (if any)
-      - Reference specific files created: "Use {{file_path}} for {{purpose}}"
-      - Format example:
-        ```
-        ### Learnings from Previous Story
-
-        **From Story {{previous_story_key}} (Status: {{previous_status}})**
-
-        - **New Service Created**: `AuthService` base class available at `src/services/AuthService.js` - use `AuthService.register()` method
-        - **Architectural Change**: Switched from session-based to JWT authentication
-        - **Schema Changes**: User model now includes `passwordHash` field, migration applied
-        - **Technical Debt**: Email verification skipped, should be included in this or subsequent story
-        - **Testing Setup**: Auth test suite initialized at `tests/integration/auth.test.js` - follow patterns established there
-        - **Pending Review Items**: Rate limiting mentioned in review - consider for this story
-
-        [Source: stories/{{previous_story_key}}.md#Dev-Agent-Record]
-        ```
-    </action>
-
-    <template-output file="{default_output_file}">change_log</template-output>
-  </step>
-
-  <step n="8" goal="Validate, save, and mark story drafted" tag="sprint-status">
-    <invoke-task>Validate against checklist at {installed_path}/checklist.md using bmad/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml</invoke-task>
-    <action>Save document unconditionally (non-interactive default). In interactive mode, allow user confirmation.</action>
-
-    <!-- Mark story as drafted in sprint status -->
-    <action>Update {{output_folder}}/sprint-status.yaml</action>
-    <action>Load the FULL file and read all development_status entries</action>
-    <action>Find development_status key matching {{story_key}}</action>
-    <action>Verify current status is "backlog" (expected previous state)</action>
-    <action>Update development_status[{{story_key}}] = "drafted"</action>
-    <action>Save file, preserving ALL comments and structure including STATUS DEFINITIONS</action>
-
-    <check if="story key not found in file">
-      <output>⚠️ Could not update story status: {{story_key}} not found in sprint-status.yaml
-
-Story file was created successfully, but sprint-status.yaml was not updated.
-You may need to run sprint-planning to refresh tracking, or manually set the story row status to `drafted`.
-      </output>
-    </check>
-
-    <action>Report created/updated story path</action>
-    <output>**✅ Story Created Successfully, {user_name}!**
-
-**Story Details:**
-- Story ID: {{story_id}}
-- Story Key: {{story_key}}
-- File: {{story_file}}
-- Status: drafted (was backlog)
-
-**⚠️ Important:** The following workflows are context-intensive. It's recommended to clear context and restart the SM agent before running the next command.
-
-**Next Steps:**
-1. Review the drafted story in {{story_file}}
-2. **[RECOMMENDED]** Run `story-context` to generate technical context XML and mark story ready for development (combines context + ready in one step)
-3. Or run `story-ready` to manually mark the story ready without generating technical context
-    </output>
-  </step>
-
-</workflow>
-````

package/src/modules/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/dev-story/AUDIT-REPORT.md

@@ -1,367 +0,0 @@
-# Workflow Audit Report
-
-**Workflow:** dev-story
-**Audit Date:** 2025-10-25
-**Auditor:** Audit Workflow (BMAD v6)
-**Workflow Type:** Action Workflow
-**Module:** BMM (BMad Method)
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-**Overall Status:** GOOD - Minor issues to address
-
-- Critical Issues: 0
-- Important Issues: 3
-- Cleanup Recommendations: 2
-
-The dev-story workflow is well-structured and follows most BMAD v6 standards. The workflow correctly sets `web_bundle: false` as expected for implementation workflows. However, there are several config variable usage issues and some variables referenced in instructions that are not defined in the YAML.
-
----
-
-## 1. Standard Config Block Validation
-
-**Status:** PASS ✓
-
-The workflow.yaml contains all required standard config variables:
-
-- ✓ `config_source: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/config.yaml"` - Correctly defined
-- ✓ `output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"` - Pulls from config_source
-- ✓ `user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"` - Pulls from config_source
-- ✓ `communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"` - Pulls from config_source
-- ✓ `date: system-generated` - Correctly set
-
-All standard config variables are present and properly formatted using {project-root} variable syntax.
-
----
-
-## 2. YAML/Instruction/Template Alignment
-
-**Variables Analyzed:** 9 (excluding standard config)
-**Used in Instructions:** 6
-**Unused (Bloat):** 3
-
-### YAML Variables Defined
-
-1. `story_dir` - USED in instructions (file paths)
-2. `context_path` - UNUSED (appears to duplicate story_dir)
-3. `story_file` - USED in instructions
-4. `context_file` - USED in instructions
-5. `installed_path` - USED in instructions (workflow.xml reference)
-6. `instructions` - USED in instructions (self-reference in critical tag)
-7. `validation` - USED in instructions (checklist reference)
-8. `web_bundle` - CONFIGURATION (correctly set to false)
-9. `date` - USED in instructions (config variable)
-
-### Variables Used in Instructions But NOT Defined in YAML
-
-**IMPORTANT ISSUE:** The following variables are referenced in instructions.md but are NOT defined in workflow.yaml:
-
-1. `{user_skill_level}` - Used 4 times (lines 6, 13, 173, 182)
-2. `{document_output_language}` - Used 1 time (line 7)
-3. `{run_until_complete}` - Used 1 time (line 108)
-4. `{run_tests_command}` - Used 1 time (line 120)
-
-These variables appear to be pulling from config.yaml but are not explicitly defined in the workflow.yaml file. While the config_source mechanism may provide these, workflow.yaml should document all variables used in the workflow for clarity.
-
-### Unused Variables (Bloat)
-
-1. **context_path** - Defined as `"{config_source}:dev_story_location"` but never used. This duplicates `story_dir` functionality.
-
----
-
-## 3. Config Variable Usage
-
-**Communication Language:** PASS ✓
-**User Name:** PASS ✓
-**Output Folder:** PASS ✓
-**Date:** PASS ✓
-
-### Detailed Analysis
-
-**Communication Language:**
-
-- ✓ Used in line 6: "Communicate all responses in {communication_language}"
-- ✓ Properly used as agent instruction variable (not in template)
-
-**User Name:**
-
-- ✓ Used in line 169: "Communicate to {user_name} that story implementation is complete"
-- ✓ Appropriately used for personalization
-
-**Output Folder:**
-
-- ✓ Used multiple times for sprint-status.yaml file paths
-- ✓ All file operations target {output_folder} correctly
-- ✓ No hardcoded paths detected
-
-**Date:**
-
-- ✓ Available for agent use (system-generated)
-- ✓ Used appropriately in context of workflow execution
-
-### Additional Config Variables
-
-**IMPORTANT ISSUE:** The workflow uses additional variables that appear to come from config but are not explicitly documented:
-
-1. `{user_skill_level}` - Used to tailor communication style
-2. `{document_output_language}` - Used for document generation
-3. `{run_until_complete}` - Used for execution control
-4. `{run_tests_command}` - Used for test execution
-
-These should either be:
-
-- Added to workflow.yaml with proper config_source references, OR
-- Documented as optional config variables with defaults
-
----
-
-## 4. Web Bundle Validation
-
-**Web Bundle Present:** No (Intentional)
-**Status:** EXPECTED ✓
-
-The workflow correctly sets `web_bundle: false`. This is the expected configuration for implementation workflows that:
-
-- Run locally in the development environment
-- Don't need to be bundled for web deployment
-- Are IDE-integrated workflows
-
-**No issues found** - This is the correct configuration for dev-story.
-
----
-
-## 5. Bloat Detection
-
-**Bloat Percentage:** 11% (1 unused field / 9 total fields)
-**Cleanup Potential:** Low
-
-### Unused YAML Fields
-
-1. **context_path** (line 11 in workflow.yaml)
-   - Defined as: `"{config_source}:dev_story_location"`
-   - Never referenced in instructions.md
-   - Duplicates functionality of `story_dir` variable
-   - **Recommendation:** Remove this variable as `story_dir` serves the same purpose
-
-### Hardcoded Values
-
-No significant hardcoded values that should be variables were detected. The workflow properly uses variables for:
-
-- File paths ({output_folder}, {story_dir})
-- User personalization ({user_name})
-- Communication style ({communication_language}, {user_skill_level})
-
-### Calculation
-
-- Total yaml fields: 9 (excluding standard config and metadata)
-- Used fields: 8
-- Unused fields: 1 (context_path)
-- Bloat percentage: 11%
-
-**Status:** Acceptable (under 15% threshold)
-
----
-
-## 6. Template Variable Mapping
-
-**Not Applicable** - This is an action workflow, not a document workflow.
-
-No template.md file exists, which is correct for action-type workflows.
-
----
-
-## 7. Instructions Quality Analysis
-
-### Structure
-
-- ✓ Steps numbered sequentially (1, 1.5, 2-7)
-- ✓ Each step has clear goal attributes
-- ✓ Proper use of XML tags (<action>, <check>, <goto>, <anchor>, <output>)
-- ✓ Logical flow control with anchors and conditional checks
-- ✓ Repeat patterns used appropriately (step 2-5 loop)
-
-### Critical Tags
-
-- ✓ Critical blocks present and well-defined
-- ✓ Clear references to workflow execution engine
-- ✓ Workflow.yaml load requirement specified
-- ✓ Communication preferences documented
-
-### Variable Usage Consistency
-
-**ISSUE:** Inconsistent variable syntax found:
-
-1. Lines 4, 5 use `{project_root}` (underscore)
-2. Line 166 uses `{project-root}` (hyphen)
-
-**Recommendation:** Standardize to `{project-root}` throughout (hyphen is the standard in BMAD v6)
-
-### Step Quality
-
-**Excellent:**
-
-- Steps are focused and single-purpose
-- Clear HALT conditions defined
-- Comprehensive validation checks
-- Good error handling patterns
-- Iterative execution model well-structured
-
-**Areas for improvement:**
-
-- Step 1 is complex and could potentially be split
-- Some <action if="..."> conditionals could be clearer with <check> blocks
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Critical (Fix Immediately)
-
-None - No critical issues detected.
-
-### Important (Address Soon)
-
-1. **Document or Define Missing Variables**
-   - Add explicit definitions in workflow.yaml for: `user_skill_level`, `document_output_language`, `run_until_complete`, `run_tests_command`
-   - OR document these as optional config variables with defaults
-   - These variables are used in instructions but not defined in YAML
-   - **Impact:** Reduces clarity and may cause confusion about variable sources
-
-2. **Standardize project-root Variable Syntax**
-   - Change line 4 `{project_root}` to `{project-root}` (hyphen)
-   - Ensure consistency with BMAD v6 standard naming convention
-   - **Impact:** Maintains consistency with framework standards
-
-3. **Remove or Use context_path Variable**
-   - Variable `context_path` is defined but never used
-   - Since `story_dir` serves the same purpose, remove `context_path`
-   - OR if there's a semantic difference, document why both exist
-   - **Impact:** Reduces bloat and potential confusion
-
-### Cleanup (Nice to Have)
-
-1. **Consider Splitting Step 1**
-   - Step 1 handles both story discovery AND file loading
-   - Could be split into "1. Find Story" and "2. Load Story Files"
-   - Would improve clarity and maintainability
-   - **Impact:** Minor improvement to workflow structure
-
-2. **Add Variable Documentation Comment**
-   - Add a comment block in workflow.yaml listing all variables used by this workflow
-   - Include both explicit YAML variables and config-pulled variables
-   - Example format:
-     ```yaml
-     # Workflow-specific variables
-     # - story_file: Path to story markdown
-     # - story_dir: Directory containing stories
-     #
-     # Config-pulled variables (from bmm/config.yaml)
-     # - user_skill_level: User's technical skill level
-     # - document_output_language: Language for generated docs
-     ```
-   - **Impact:** Improves developer understanding and maintenance
-
----
-
-## Validation Checklist
-
-### Structure ✓
-
-- [x] workflow.yaml loads without YAML syntax errors
-- [x] instructions.md exists and is properly formatted
-- [x] No template.md (correct for action workflow)
-- [x] All critical headers present in instructions
-- [x] Workflow type correctly identified (action)
-- [x] All referenced files exist
-- [x] No placeholder text remains
-
-### Standard Config Block ✓
-
-- [x] config_source points to correct module config
-- [x] output_folder pulls from config_source
-- [x] user_name pulls from config_source
-- [x] communication_language pulls from config_source
-- [x] date is system-generated
-- [x] Config source uses {project-root} variable
-- [x] Standard config comment present
-
-### Config Variable Usage ✓
-
-- [x] Instructions communicate in {communication_language}
-- [x] Instructions address {user_name}
-- [x] All file outputs use {output_folder}
-- [x] No hardcoded paths
-- [x] Date available for agent awareness
-
-### YAML/Instruction/Template Alignment ⚠️
-
-- [⚠️] Some variables used in instructions not defined in YAML
-- [x] Template variables N/A (action workflow)
-- [x] Variable names are descriptive
-- [⚠️] One unused yaml field (context_path)
-
-### Web Bundle Validation ✓
-
-- [x] web_bundle: false is correct for this workflow
-- [x] No web_bundle section needed
-- [x] Workflow is local/IDE-integrated only
-
-### Instructions Quality ✓
-
-- [x] Steps numbered sequentially
-- [x] Clear goal attributes
-- [x] Proper XML tag usage
-- [x] Logical flow control
-- [⚠️] Minor inconsistency: {project_root} vs {project-root}
-
-### Bloat Detection ✓
-
-- [x] Bloat percentage: 11% (acceptable, under 15%)
-- [x] No significant hardcoded values
-- [x] No redundant configuration
-- [x] One cleanup recommendation (context_path)
-
----
-
-## Next Steps
-
-1. **Define missing variables** - Add explicit YAML definitions or document as config-pulled variables
-2. **Standardize variable syntax** - Change `{project_root}` to `{project-root}`
-3. **Remove context_path** - Clean up unused variable
-4. **Re-run audit** - Verify improvements after fixes
-
----
-
-## Additional Notes
-
-### Strengths
-
-1. **Comprehensive Workflow Logic:** The dev-story workflow is well-thought-out with proper error handling, validation gates, and iterative execution
-2. **Config Integration:** Excellent use of config variables for user personalization and output management
-3. **Clear Documentation:** Instructions are detailed with specific HALT conditions and validation checkpoints
-4. **Proper Web Bundle Setting:** Correctly identifies this as a local-only workflow with web_bundle: false
-5. **Step Flow:** Excellent use of anchors, goto, and conditional checks for complex flow control
-
-### Workflow Purpose
-
-This workflow executes user stories by:
-
-- Finding ready-for-dev stories from sprint status
-- Implementing tasks and subtasks incrementally
-- Writing comprehensive tests
-- Validating against acceptance criteria
-- Updating story status through sprint lifecycle
-- Supporting different user skill levels with adaptive communication
-
-The workflow is a critical part of the BMM implementation phase and shows mature design patterns.
-
----
-
-**Audit Complete** - Generated by audit-workflow v1.0
-
-**Pass Rate:** 89% (62 passed / 70 total checks)
-**Recommendation:** Good - Minor fixes needed
-
-The dev-story workflow is production-ready with minor improvements recommended. The issues identified are primarily documentation and consistency improvements rather than functional problems.