bmad-method 6.0.0-alpha.2 → 6.0.0-alpha.21

package/src/core/resources/excalidraw/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# Core Excalidraw Resources
+
+Universal knowledge for creating Excalidraw diagrams. All agents that create Excalidraw files should reference these resources.
+
+## Purpose
+
+Provides the **HOW** (universal knowledge) while agents provide the **WHAT** (domain-specific application).
+
+**Core = "How to create Excalidraw elements"**
+
+- How to group shapes with text labels
+- How to calculate text width
+- How to create arrows with proper bindings
+- How to validate JSON syntax
+- Base structure and primitives
+
+**Agents = "What diagrams to create"**
+
+- Frame Expert (BMM): Technical flowcharts, architecture diagrams, wireframes
+- Presentation Master (CIS): Pitch decks, creative visuals, Rube Goldberg machines
+- Tech Writer (BMM): Documentation diagrams, concept explanations
+
+## Files in This Directory
+
+### excalidraw-helpers.md
+
+**Universal element creation patterns**
+
+- Text width calculation
+- Element grouping rules (shapes + labels)
+- Grid alignment
+- Arrow creation (straight, elbow)
+- Theme application
+- Validation checklist
+- Optimization rules
+
+**Agents reference this to:**
+
+- Create properly grouped shapes
+- Calculate text dimensions
+- Connect elements with arrows
+- Ensure valid structure
+
+### validate-json-instructions.md
+
+**Universal JSON validation process**
+
+- How to validate Excalidraw JSON
+- Common errors and fixes
+- Workflow integration
+- Error recovery
+
+**Agents reference this to:**
+
+- Validate files after creation
+- Fix syntax errors
+- Ensure files can be opened in Excalidraw
+
+### library-loader.md (Future)
+
+**How to load external .excalidrawlib files**
+
+- Programmatic library loading
+- Community library integration
+- Custom library management
+
+**Status:** To be developed when implementing external library support.
+
+## How Agents Use These Resources
+
+### Example: Frame Expert (Technical Diagrams)
+
+```yaml
+# workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-flowchart/workflow.yaml
+helpers: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/resources/excalidraw/excalidraw-helpers.md'
+json_validation: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/resources/excalidraw/validate-json-instructions.md'
+```
+
+**Domain-specific additions:**
+
+```yaml
+# workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/_shared/flowchart-templates.yaml
+flowchart:
+  start_node:
+    type: ellipse
+    width: 120
+    height: 60
+  process_box:
+    type: rectangle
+    width: 160
+    height: 80
+  decision_diamond:
+    type: diamond
+    width: 140
+    height: 100
+```
+
+### Example: Presentation Master (Creative Visuals)
+
+```yaml
+# workflows/create-visual-metaphor/workflow.yaml
+helpers: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/resources/excalidraw/excalidraw-helpers.md'
+json_validation: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/resources/excalidraw/validate-json-instructions.md'
+```
+
+**Domain-specific additions:**
+
+```yaml
+# workflows/_shared/creative-templates.yaml
+rube_goldberg:
+  whimsical_connector:
+    type: arrow
+    strokeStyle: dashed
+    roughness: 2
+  playful_box:
+    type: rectangle
+    roundness: 12
+```
+
+## What Doesn't Belong in Core
+
+**Domain-Specific Elements:**
+
+- Flowchart-specific templates (belongs in Frame Expert)
+- Pitch deck layouts (belongs in Presentation Master)
+- Documentation-specific styles (belongs in Tech Writer)
+
+**Agent Workflows:**
+
+- How to create a flowchart (Frame Expert workflow)
+- How to create a pitch deck (Presentation Master workflow)
+- Step-by-step diagram creation (agent-specific)
+
+**Theming:**
+
+- Currently in agent workflows
+- **Future:** Will be refactored to core as user-configurable themes
+
+## Architecture Principle
+
+**Single Source of Truth:**
+
+- Core holds universal knowledge
+- Agents reference core, don't duplicate
+- Updates to core benefit all agents
+- Agents specialize with domain knowledge
+
+**DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself):**
+
+- Element creation logic: ONCE in core
+- Text width calculation: ONCE in core
+- Validation process: ONCE in core
+- Arrow binding patterns: ONCE in core
+
+## Future Enhancements
+
+1. **External Library Loader** - Load .excalidrawlib files from libraries.excalidraw.com
+2. **Theme Management** - User-configurable color themes saved in core
+3. **Component Library** - Shared reusable components across agents
+4. **Layout Algorithms** - Auto-layout helpers for positioning elements

package/src/core/resources/excalidraw/excalidraw-helpers.md

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+# Excalidraw Element Creation Guidelines
+
+## Text Width Calculation
+
+For text elements inside shapes (labels):
+
+```
+text_width = (text.length × fontSize × 0.6) + 20
+```
+
+Round to nearest 10 for grid alignment.
+
+## Element Grouping Rules
+
+**CRITICAL:** When creating shapes with labels:
+
+1. Generate unique IDs:
+   - `shape-id` for the shape
+   - `text-id` for the text
+   - `group-id` for the group
+
+2. Shape element must have:
+   - `groupIds: [group-id]`
+   - `boundElements: [{type: "text", id: text-id}]`
+
+3. Text element must have:
+   - `containerId: shape-id`
+   - `groupIds: [group-id]` (SAME as shape)
+   - `textAlign: "center"`
+   - `verticalAlign: "middle"`
+   - `width: calculated_width`
+
+## Grid Alignment
+
+- Snap all `x`, `y` coordinates to 20px grid
+- Formula: `Math.round(value / 20) * 20`
+- Spacing between elements: 60px minimum
+
+## Arrow Creation
+
+### Straight Arrows
+
+Use for forward flow (left-to-right, top-to-bottom):
+
+```json
+{
+  "type": "arrow",
+  "startBinding": {
+    "elementId": "source-shape-id",
+    "focus": 0,
+    "gap": 10
+  },
+  "endBinding": {
+    "elementId": "target-shape-id",
+    "focus": 0,
+    "gap": 10
+  },
+  "points": [[0, 0], [distance_x, distance_y]]
+}
+```
+
+### Elbow Arrows
+
+Use for upward flow, backward flow, or complex routing:
+
+```json
+{
+  "type": "arrow",
+  "startBinding": {...},
+  "endBinding": {...},
+  "points": [
+    [0, 0],
+    [intermediate_x, 0],
+    [intermediate_x, intermediate_y],
+    [final_x, final_y]
+  ],
+  "elbowed": true
+}
+```
+
+### Update Connected Shapes
+
+After creating arrow, update `boundElements` on both connected shapes:
+
+```json
+{
+  "id": "shape-id",
+  "boundElements": [
+    { "type": "text", "id": "text-id" },
+    { "type": "arrow", "id": "arrow-id" }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+## Theme Application
+
+Theme colors should be applied consistently:
+
+- **Shapes**: `backgroundColor` from theme primary fill
+- **Borders**: `strokeColor` from theme accent
+- **Text**: `strokeColor` = "#1e1e1e" (dark text)
+- **Arrows**: `strokeColor` from theme accent
+
+## Validation Checklist
+
+Before saving, verify:
+
+- [ ] All shapes with labels have matching `groupIds`
+- [ ] All text elements have `containerId` pointing to parent shape
+- [ ] Text width calculated properly (no cutoff)
+- [ ] Text alignment set (`textAlign` + `verticalAlign`)
+- [ ] All elements snapped to 20px grid
+- [ ] All arrows have `startBinding` and `endBinding`
+- [ ] `boundElements` array updated on connected shapes
+- [ ] Theme colors applied consistently
+- [ ] No metadata or history in final output
+- [ ] All IDs are unique
+
+## Optimization
+
+Remove from final output:
+
+- `appState` object
+- `files` object (unless images used)
+- All elements with `isDeleted: true`
+- Unused library items
+- Version history

package/src/core/resources/excalidraw/library-loader.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# External Library Loader
+
+**Status:** Placeholder for future implementation
+
+## Purpose
+
+Load external .excalidrawlib files from <https://libraries.excalidraw.com> or custom sources.
+
+## Planned Capabilities
+
+- Load libraries by URL
+- Load libraries from local files
+- Merge multiple libraries
+- Filter library components
+- Cache loaded libraries
+
+## API Reference
+
+Will document how to use:
+
+- `importLibrary(url)` - Load library from URL
+- `loadSceneOrLibraryFromBlob()` - Load from file
+- `mergeLibraryItems()` - Combine libraries
+
+## Usage Example
+
+```yaml
+# Future workflow.yaml structure
+libraries:
+  - url: 'https://libraries.excalidraw.com/libraries/...'
+    filter: ['aws', 'cloud']
+  - path: '{project-root}/_data/custom-library.excalidrawlib'
+```
+
+## Implementation Notes
+
+This will be developed when agents need to leverage the extensive library ecosystem available at <https://libraries.excalidraw.com>.
+
+Hundreds of pre-built component libraries exist for:
+
+- AWS/Cloud icons
+- UI/UX components
+- Business diagrams
+- Mind map shapes
+- Floor plans
+- And much more...
+
+## User Configuration
+
+Future: Users will be able to configure favorite libraries in their BMAD config for automatic loading.

package/src/core/resources/excalidraw/validate-json-instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+# JSON Validation Instructions
+
+## Purpose
+
+Validate Excalidraw JSON files after saving to catch syntax errors (missing commas, brackets, quotes).
+
+## How to Validate
+
+Use Node.js built-in JSON parsing to validate the file:
+
+```bash
+node -e "JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('FILE_PATH', 'utf8')); console.log('✓ Valid JSON')"
+```
+
+Replace `FILE_PATH` with the actual file path.
+
+## Exit Codes
+
+- Exit code 0 = Valid JSON
+- Exit code 1 = Invalid JSON (syntax error)
+
+## Error Output
+
+If invalid, Node.js will output:
+
+- Error message with description
+- Position in file where error occurred
+- Line and column information (if available)
+
+## Common Errors and Fixes
+
+### Missing Comma
+
+```
+SyntaxError: Expected ',' or '}' after property value
+```
+
+**Fix:** Add comma after the property value
+
+### Missing Bracket/Brace
+
+```
+SyntaxError: Unexpected end of JSON input
+```
+
+**Fix:** Add missing closing bracket `]` or brace `}`
+
+### Extra Comma (Trailing)
+
+```
+SyntaxError: Unexpected token ,
+```
+
+**Fix:** Remove the trailing comma before `]` or `}`
+
+### Missing Quote
+
+```
+SyntaxError: Unexpected token
+```
+
+**Fix:** Add missing quote around string value
+
+## Workflow Integration
+
+After saving an Excalidraw file, run validation:
+
+1. Save the file
+2. Run: `node -e "JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('{{save_location}}', 'utf8')); console.log('✓ Valid JSON')"`
+3. If validation fails:
+   - Read the error message for line/position
+   - Open the file at that location
+   - Fix the syntax error
+   - Save and re-validate
+4. Repeat until validation passes
+
+## Critical Rule
+
+**NEVER delete the file due to validation errors - always fix the syntax error at the reported location.**

package/src/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation-methods.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern
+1,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment
+2,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations
+3,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis
+4,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities
+5,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact
+6,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
+7,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding
+8,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view
+9,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result
+10,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
+11,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection
+12,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns
+13,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis
+14,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus
+15,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization
+16,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy
+17,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening
+18,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement
+19,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards
+20,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
+21,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha
+22,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner
+23,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
+24,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations
+25,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R
+26,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward
+27,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights
+28,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas
+29,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
+30,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
+31,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis
+32,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
+33,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation
+34,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
+35,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
+36,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
+37,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
+38,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden
+39,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach
+40,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution
+41,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding
+42,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
+43,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion
+44,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content
+45,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
+46,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement
+47,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection
+48,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
+49,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application
+50,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions

package/src/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+<task id="_bmad/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml" name="Advanced Elicitation" standalone="true"
+  methods="{project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation-methods.csv"
+  agent-party="{project-root}/_bmad/_config/agent-manifest.csv">
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+    <i>Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <integration description="When called from workflow">
+    <desc>When called during template workflow processing:</desc>
+    <i>1. Receive or review the current section content that was just generated or</i>
+    <i>2. Apply elicitation methods iteratively to enhance that specific content</i>
+    <i>3. Return the enhanced version back when user selects 'x' to proceed and return back</i>
+    <i>4. The enhanced content replaces the original section content in the output document</i>
+  </integration>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Method Registry Loading">
+      <action>Load and read {{methods}} and {{agent-party}}</action>
+
+      <csv-structure>
+        <i>category: Method grouping (core, structural, risk, etc.)</i>
+        <i>method_name: Display name for the method</i>
+        <i>description: Rich explanation of what the method does, when to use it, and why it's valuable</i>
+        <i>output_pattern: Flexible flow guide using → arrows (e.g., "analysis → insights → action")</i>
+      </csv-structure>
+
+      <context-analysis>
+        <i>Use conversation history</i>
+        <i>Analyze: content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, and creative potential</i>
+      </context-analysis>
+
+      <smart-selection>
+        <i>1. Analyze context: Content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, creative potential</i>
+        <i>2. Parse descriptions: Understand each method's purpose from the rich descriptions in CSV</i>
+        <i>3. Select 5 methods: Choose methods that best match the context based on their descriptions</i>
+        <i>4. Balance approach: Include mix of foundational and specialized techniques as appropriate</i>
+      </smart-selection>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Present Options and Handle Responses">
+
+      <format>
+        **Advanced Elicitation Options (If you launched Party Mode, they will participate randomly)**
+        Choose a number (1-5), [r] to Reshuffle, [a] List All, or [x] to Proceed:
+
+        1. [Method Name]
+        2. [Method Name]
+        3. [Method Name]
+        4. [Method Name]
+        5. [Method Name]
+        r. Reshuffle the list with 5 new options
+        a. List all methods with descriptions
+        x. Proceed / No Further Actions
+      </format>
+
+      <response-handling>
+        <case n="1-5">
+          <i>Execute the selected method using its description from the CSV</i>
+          <i>Adapt the method's complexity and output format based on the current context</i>
+          <i>Apply the method creatively to the current section content being enhanced</i>
+          <i>Display the enhanced version showing what the method revealed or improved</i>
+          <i>CRITICAL: Ask the user if they would like to apply the changes to the doc (y/n/other) and HALT to await response.</i>
+          <i>CRITICAL: ONLY if Yes, apply the changes. IF No, discard your memory of the proposed changes. If any other reply, try best to
+            follow the instructions given by the user.</i>
+          <i>CRITICAL: Re-present the same 1-5,r,x prompt to allow additional elicitations</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="r">
+          <i>Select 5 random methods from advanced-elicitation-methods.csv, present new list with same prompt format</i>
+          <i>When selecting, try to think and pick a diverse set of methods covering different categories and approaches, with 1 and 2 being
+            potentially the most useful for the document or section being discovered</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="x">
+          <i>Complete elicitation and proceed</i>
+          <i>Return the fully enhanced content back to create-doc.md</i>
+          <i>The enhanced content becomes the final version for that section</i>
+          <i>Signal completion back to create-doc.md to continue with next section</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="a">
+          <i>List all methods with their descriptions from the CSV in a compact table</i>
+          <i>Allow user to select any method by name or number from the full list</i>
+          <i>After selection, execute the method as described in the n="1-5" case above</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="direct-feedback">
+          <i>Apply changes to current section content and re-present choices</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="multiple-numbers">
+          <i>Execute methods in sequence on the content, then re-offer choices</i>
+        </case>
+      </response-handling>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Execution Guidelines">
+      <i>Method execution: Use the description from CSV to understand and apply each method</i>
+      <i>Output pattern: Use the pattern as a flexible guide (e.g., "paths → evaluation → selection")</i>
+      <i>Dynamic adaptation: Adjust complexity based on content needs (simple to sophisticated)</i>
+      <i>Creative application: Interpret methods flexibly based on context while maintaining pattern consistency</i>
+      <i>Focus on actionable insights</i>
+      <i>Stay relevant: Tie elicitation to specific content being analyzed (the current section from the document being created unless user
+        indicates otherwise)</i>
+      <i>Identify personas: For single or multi-persona methods, clearly identify viewpoints, and use party members if available in memory
+        already</i>
+      <i>Critical loop behavior: Always re-offer the 1-5,r,a,x choices after each method execution</i>
+      <i>Continue until user selects 'x' to proceed with enhanced content, confirm or ask the user what should be accepted from the session</i>
+      <i>Each method application builds upon previous enhancements</i>
+      <i>Content preservation: Track all enhancements made during elicitation</i>
+      <i>Iterative enhancement: Each selected method (1-5) should:</i>
+      <i> 1. Apply to the current enhanced version of the content</i>
+      <i> 2. Show the improvements made</i>
+      <i> 3. Return to the prompt for additional elicitations or completion</i>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+</task>

package/src/core/tasks/index-docs.xml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<task id="bmad/core/tasks/index-docs" name="Index Docs"
+<task id="_bmad/core/tasks/index-docs" name="Index Docs"
   description="Generates or updates an index.md of all documents in the specified directory" webskip="true" standalone="true">
   <llm critical="true">
     <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>

package/src/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+<!-- if possible, run this in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, 
+  but no context except the content to review -->
+
+<task id="_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml" name="Adversarial Review (General)">
+  <objective>Cynically review content and produce findings</objective>
+
+  <inputs>
+    <input name="content" desc="Content to review - diff, spec, story, doc, or any artifact" />
+  </inputs>
+
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work</i>
+    <i>The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems</i>
+    <i>Be skeptical of everything</i>
+    <i>Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong</i>
+    <i>Use a precise, professional tone - no profanity or personal attacks</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Receive Content">
+      <action>Load the content to review from provided input or context</action>
+      <action>If content to review is empty, ask for clarification and abort task</action>
+      <action>Identify content type (diff, branch, uncommitted changes, document, etc.)</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Adversarial Analysis" critical="true">
+      <mandate>Review with extreme skepticism - assume problems exist</mandate>
+      <action>Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Present Findings">
+      <action>Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only)</action>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+
+  <halt-conditions>
+    <condition>HALT if zero findings - this is suspicious, re-analyze or ask for guidance</condition>
+    <condition>HALT if content is empty or unreadable</condition>
+  </halt-conditions>
+
+</task>

package/src/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<task id="bmad/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml" name="Validate Workflow Output">
+<task id="_bmad/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml" name="Validate Workflow Output">
   <objective>Run a checklist against a document with thorough analysis and produce a validation report</objective>
 
   <inputs>