bmad-method 5.1.3 → 6.0.0-Beta.1

package/docs/tea/explanation/testing-as-engineering.md

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+---
+title: "AI-Generated Testing: Why Most Approaches Fail"
+description: How Playwright-Utils, TEA workflows, and Playwright MCPs solve AI test quality problems
+---
+
+
+AI-generated tests frequently fail in production because they lack systematic quality standards. This document explains the problem and presents a solution combining three components: Playwright-Utils, TEA (Test Architect), and Playwright MCPs.
+
+:::note[Source]
+This article is adapted from [The Testing Meta Most Teams Have Not Caught Up To Yet](https://dev.to/muratkeremozcan/the-testing-meta-most-teams-have-not-caught-up-to-yet-5765) by Murat K Ozcan.
+:::
+
+## The Problem with AI-Generated Tests
+
+When teams use AI to generate tests without structure, they often produce what can be called "slop factory" outputs:
+
+| Issue | Description |
+|-------|-------------|
+| Redundant coverage | Multiple tests covering the same functionality |
+| Incorrect assertions | Tests that pass but don't actually verify behavior |
+| Flaky tests | Non-deterministic tests that randomly pass or fail |
+| Unreviewable diffs | Generated code too verbose or inconsistent to review |
+
+The core problem is that prompt-driven testing paths lean into nondeterminism, which is the exact opposite of what testing exists to protect.
+
+:::caution[The Paradox]
+AI excels at generating code quickly, but testing requires precision and consistency. Without guardrails, AI-generated tests amplify the chaos they're meant to prevent.
+:::
+
+## The Solution: A Three-Part Stack
+
+The solution combines three components that work together to enforce quality:
+
+### Playwright-Utils
+
+Bridges the gap between Cypress ergonomics and Playwright's capabilities by standardizing commonly reinvented primitives through utility functions.
+
+| Utility | Purpose |
+|---------|---------|
+| api-request | API calls with schema validation |
+| auth-session | Authentication handling |
+| intercept-network-call | Network mocking and interception |
+| recurse | Retry logic and polling |
+| log | Structured logging |
+| network-recorder | Record and replay network traffic |
+| burn-in | Smart test selection for CI |
+| network-error-monitor | HTTP error detection |
+| file-utils | CSV/PDF handling |
+
+These utilities eliminate the need to reinvent authentication, API calls, retries, and logging for every project.
+
+### TEA (Test Architect Agent)
+
+A quality operating model packaged as eight executable workflows spanning test design, CI/CD gates, and release readiness. TEA encodes test architecture expertise into repeatable processes.
+
+| Workflow | Purpose |
+|----------|---------|
+| `test-design` | Risk-based test planning per epic |
+| `framework` | Scaffold production-ready test infrastructure |
+| `ci` | CI pipeline with selective testing |
+| `atdd` | Acceptance test-driven development |
+| `automate` | Prioritized test automation |
+| `test-review` | Test quality audits (0-100 score) |
+| `nfr-assess` | Non-functional requirements assessment |
+| `trace` | Coverage traceability and gate decisions |
+
+:::tip[Key Insight]
+TEA doesn't just generate tests—it provides a complete quality operating model with workflows for planning, execution, and release gates.
+:::
+
+### Playwright MCPs
+
+Model Context Protocols enable real-time verification during test generation. Instead of inferring selectors and behavior from documentation, MCPs allow agents to:
+
+- Run flows and confirm the DOM against the accessibility tree
+- Validate network responses in real-time
+- Discover actual functionality through interactive exploration
+- Verify generated tests against live applications
+
+## How They Work Together
+
+The three components form a quality pipeline:
+
+| Stage | Component | Action |
+|-------|-----------|--------|
+| Standards | Playwright-Utils | Provides production-ready patterns and utilities |
+| Process | TEA Workflows | Enforces systematic test planning and review |
+| Verification | Playwright MCPs | Validates generated tests against live applications |
+
+**Before (AI-only):** 20 tests with redundant coverage, incorrect assertions, and flaky behavior.
+
+**After (Full Stack):** Risk-based selection, verified selectors, validated behavior, reviewable code.
+
+## Why This Matters
+
+Traditional AI testing approaches fail because they:
+
+- **Lack quality standards** — No consistent patterns or utilities
+- **Skip planning** — Jump straight to test generation without risk assessment
+- **Can't verify** — Generate tests without validating against actual behavior
+- **Don't review** — No systematic audit of generated test quality
+
+The three-part stack addresses each gap:
+
+| Gap | Solution |
+|-----|----------|
+| No standards | Playwright-Utils provides production-ready patterns |
+| No planning | TEA `test-design` creates risk-based test plans |
+| No verification | Playwright MCPs validate against live applications |
+| No review | TEA `test-review` audits quality with scoring |
+
+This approach is sometimes called *context engineering*—loading domain-specific standards into AI context automatically rather than relying on prompts alone. TEA's `tea-index.csv` manifest loads relevant knowledge fragments so the AI doesn't relearn testing patterns each session.

package/docs/tea/glossary/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+---
+title: "BMad Glossary"
+---
+
+Terminology reference for the BMad Method.
+
+## Core Concepts
+
+| Term                      | Definition                                                                                                                                                                        |
+| ------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Agent**                 | Specialized AI persona with specific expertise (PM, Architect, SM, DEV, TEA) that guides users through workflows and creates deliverables.                                        |
+| **BMad**                  | Breakthrough Method of Agile AI-Driven Development — AI-driven agile framework with specialized agents, guided workflows, and scale-adaptive intelligence.                        |
+| **BMad Method**           | Complete methodology for AI-assisted software development, encompassing planning, architecture, implementation, and quality assurance workflows that adapt to project complexity. |
+| **BMM**                   | BMad Method Module — core orchestration system providing comprehensive lifecycle management through specialized agents and workflows.                                             |
+| **Scale-Adaptive System** | Intelligent workflow orchestration that adjusts planning depth and documentation requirements based on project needs through three planning tracks.                               |
+| **Workflow**              | Multi-step guided process that orchestrates AI agent activities to produce specific deliverables. Workflows are interactive and adapt to user context.                            |
+
+## Scale and Complexity
+
+| Term                        | Definition                                                                                                                                                                |
+| --------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **BMad Method Track**       | Full product planning track using PRD + Architecture + UX. Best for products, platforms, and complex features. Typical range: 10-50+ stories.                             |
+| **Enterprise Method Track** | Extended planning track adding Security Architecture, DevOps Strategy, and Test Strategy. Best for compliance needs and multi-tenant systems. Typical range: 30+ stories. |
+| **Planning Track**          | Methodology path (Quick Flow, BMad Method, or Enterprise) chosen based on planning needs and complexity, not story count alone.                                           |
+| **Quick Flow Track**        | Fast implementation track using tech-spec only. Best for bug fixes, small features, and clear-scope changes. Typical range: 1-15 stories.                                 |
+
+## Planning Documents
+
+| Term                      | Definition                                                                                                                                         |
+| ------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Architecture Document** | *BMad Method/Enterprise.* System-wide design document defining structure, components, data models, integration patterns, security, and deployment. |
+| **Epics**                 | High-level feature groupings containing multiple related stories. Typically 5-15 stories each representing cohesive functionality.                 |
+| **Game Brief**            | *BMGD.* Document capturing game's core vision, pillars, target audience, and scope. Foundation for the GDD.                                        |
+| **GDD**                   | *BMGD.* Game Design Document — comprehensive document detailing all aspects of game design: mechanics, systems, content, and more.                 |
+| **PRD**                   | *BMad Method/Enterprise.* Product Requirements Document containing vision, goals, FRs, NFRs, and success criteria. Focuses on WHAT to build.       |
+| **Product Brief**         | *Phase 1.* Optional strategic document capturing product vision, market context, and high-level requirements before detailed planning.             |
+| **Tech-Spec**             | *Quick Flow only.* Comprehensive technical plan with problem statement, solution approach, file-level changes, and testing strategy.               |
+
+## Workflow and Phases
+
+| Term                        | Definition                                                                                                                                     |
+| --------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Phase 0: Documentation**  | *Brownfield.* Conditional prerequisite phase creating codebase documentation before planning. Only required if existing docs are insufficient. |
+| **Phase 1: Analysis**       | Discovery phase including brainstorming, research, and product brief creation. Optional for Quick Flow, recommended for BMad Method.           |
+| **Phase 2: Planning**       | Required phase creating formal requirements. Routes to tech-spec (Quick Flow) or PRD (BMad Method/Enterprise).                                 |
+| **Phase 3: Solutioning**    | *BMad Method/Enterprise.* Architecture design phase including creation, validation, and gate checks.                                           |
+| **Phase 4: Implementation** | Required sprint-based development through story-by-story iteration using sprint-planning, create-story, dev-story, and code-review workflows.  |
+| **Quick Spec Flow**         | Fast-track workflow for Quick Flow projects going straight from idea to tech-spec to implementation.                                           |
+| **Workflow Init**           | Initialization workflow creating bmm-workflow-status.yaml, detecting project type, and determining planning track.                             |
+| **Workflow Status**         | Universal entry point checking for existing status file, displaying progress, and recommending next action.                                    |
+
+## Agents and Roles
+
+| Term                 | Definition                                                                                                                                       |
+| -------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| **Analyst**          | Agent that initializes workflows, conducts research, creates product briefs, and tracks progress. Often the entry point for new projects.        |
+| **Architect**        | Agent designing system architecture, creating architecture documents, and validating designs. Primary agent for Phase 3.                         |
+| **BMad Master**      | Meta-level orchestrator from BMad Core facilitating party mode and providing high-level guidance across all modules.                             |
+| **DEV**              | Developer agent implementing stories, writing code, running tests, and performing code reviews. Primary implementer in Phase 4.                  |
+| **Game Architect**   | *BMGD.* Agent designing game system architecture and validating game-specific technical designs.                                                 |
+| **Game Designer**    | *BMGD.* Agent creating game design documents (GDD) and running game-specific workflows.                                                          |
+| **Party Mode**       | Multi-agent collaboration feature where agents discuss challenges together. BMad Master orchestrates, selecting 2-3 relevant agents per message. |
+| **PM**               | Product Manager agent creating PRDs and tech-specs. Primary agent for Phase 2 planning.                                                          |
+| **SM**               | Scrum Master agent managing sprints, creating stories, and coordinating implementation. Primary orchestrator for Phase 4.                        |
+| **TEA**              | Test Architect agent responsible for test strategy, quality gates, and NFR assessment. Integrates throughout all phases.                         |
+| **Technical Writer** | Agent specialized in creating technical documentation, diagrams, and maintaining documentation standards.                                        |
+| **UX Designer**      | Agent creating UX design documents, interaction patterns, and visual specifications for UI-heavy projects.                                       |
+
+## Status and Tracking
+
+| Term                         | Definition                                                                                                                   |
+| ---------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **bmm-workflow-status.yaml** | *Phases 1-3.* Tracking file showing current phase, completed workflows, and next recommended actions.                        |
+| **DoD**                      | Definition of Done — criteria for marking a story complete: implementation done, tests passing, code reviewed, docs updated. |
+| **Epic Status Progression**  | `backlog → in-progress → done` — lifecycle states for epics during implementation.                                           |
+| **Gate Check**               | Validation workflow (implementation-readiness) ensuring PRD, Architecture, and Epics are aligned before Phase 4.             |
+| **Retrospective**            | Workflow after each epic capturing learnings and improvements for continuous improvement.                                    |
+| **sprint-status.yaml**       | *Phase 4.* Single source of truth for implementation tracking containing all epics, stories, and their statuses.             |
+| **Story Status Progression** | `backlog → ready-for-dev → in-progress → review → done` — lifecycle states for stories.                                      |
+
+## Project Types
+
+| Term                     | Definition                                                                                                                      |
+| ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Brownfield**           | Existing project with established codebase and patterns. Requires understanding existing architecture and planning integration. |
+| **Convention Detection** | *Quick Flow.* Feature auto-detecting existing code style, naming conventions, and frameworks from brownfield codebases.         |
+| **document-project**     | *Brownfield.* Workflow analyzing and documenting existing codebase with three scan levels: quick, deep, exhaustive.             |
+| **Feature Flags**        | *Brownfield.* Implementation technique for gradual rollout, easy rollback, and A/B testing of new functionality.                |
+| **Greenfield**           | New project starting from scratch with freedom to establish patterns, choose stack, and design from clean slate.                |
+| **Integration Points**   | *Brownfield.* Specific locations where new code connects with existing systems. Must be documented in tech-specs.               |
+
+## Implementation Terms
+
+| Term                    | Definition                                                                                                                                 |
+| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| **Context Engineering** | Loading domain-specific standards into AI context automatically via manifests, ensuring consistent outputs regardless of prompt variation. |
+| **Correct Course**      | Workflow for navigating significant changes when implementation is off-track. Analyzes impact and recommends adjustments.                  |
+| **Shard / Sharding**    | Splitting large planning documents into section-based files for LLM optimization. Phase 4 workflows load only needed sections.             |
+| **Sprint**              | Time-boxed period of development work, typically 1-2 weeks.                                                                                |
+| **Sprint Planning**     | Workflow initializing Phase 4 by creating sprint-status.yaml and extracting epics/stories from planning docs.                              |
+| **Story**               | Single unit of implementable work with clear acceptance criteria, typically 2-8 hours of effort. Grouped into epics.                       |
+| **Story Context**       | Implementation guidance embedded in story files during create-story, referencing existing patterns and approaches.                         |
+| **Story File**          | Markdown file containing story description, acceptance criteria, technical notes, and testing requirements.                                |
+| **Track Selection**     | Automatic analysis by `bmad-help` suggesting appropriate track based on complexity indicators. User can override.                        |
+
+## Game Development Terms
+
+| Term                           | Definition                                                                                           |
+| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Fantasy**               | *BMGD.* The emotional experience players seek from your game — what they want to FEEL.               |
+| **Core Loop**                  | *BMGD.* Fundamental cycle of actions players repeat throughout gameplay. The heart of your game.     |
+| **Design Pillar**              | *BMGD.* Core principle guiding all design decisions. Typically 3-5 pillars define a game's identity. |
+| **Environmental Storytelling** | *BMGD.* Narrative communicated through the game world itself rather than explicit dialogue.          |
+| **Game Type**                  | *BMGD.* Genre classification determining which specialized GDD sections are included.                |
+| **MDA Framework**              | *BMGD.* Mechanics → Dynamics → Aesthetics — framework for analyzing and designing games.             |
+| **Meta-Progression**           | *BMGD.* Persistent progression carrying between individual runs or sessions.                         |
+| **Metroidvania**               | *BMGD.* Genre featuring interconnected world exploration with ability-gated progression.             |
+| **Narrative Complexity**       | *BMGD.* How central story is to the game: Critical, Heavy, Moderate, or Light.                       |
+| **Permadeath**                 | *BMGD.* Game mechanic where character death is permanent, typically requiring a new run.             |
+| **Player Agency**              | *BMGD.* Degree to which players can make meaningful choices affecting outcomes.                      |
+| **Procedural Generation**      | *BMGD.* Algorithmic creation of game content (levels, items, characters) rather than hand-crafted.   |
+| **Roguelike**                  | *BMGD.* Genre featuring procedural generation, permadeath, and run-based progression.                |
+
+## Test Architect (TEA) Concepts
+
+| Term                         | Definition                                                                                                                                                    |
+| ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| **ATDD**                     | Acceptance Test-Driven Development — Generating failing acceptance tests BEFORE implementation (TDD red phase).                                               |
+| **Burn-in Testing**          | Running tests multiple times (typically 5-10 iterations) to detect flakiness and intermittent failures.                                                       |
+| **Component Testing**        | Testing UI components in isolation using framework-specific tools (Cypress Component Testing or Vitest + React Testing Library).                              |
+| **Coverage Traceability**    | Mapping acceptance criteria to implemented tests with classification (FULL/PARTIAL/NONE) to identify gaps and measure completeness.                           |
+| **Epic-Level Test Design**   | Test planning per epic (Phase 4) focusing on risk assessment, priorities, and coverage strategy for that specific epic.                                       |
+| **Fixture Architecture**     | Pattern of building pure functions first, then wrapping in framework-specific fixtures for testability, reusability, and composition.                         |
+| **Gate Decision**            | Go/no-go decision for release with four outcomes: PASS ✅ (ready), CONCERNS ⚠️ (proceed with mitigation), FAIL ❌ (blocked), WAIVED ⏭️ (approved despite issues). |
+| **Knowledge Fragment**       | Individual markdown file in TEA's knowledge base covering a specific testing pattern or practice (33 fragments total).                                        |
+| **MCP Enhancements**         | Model Context Protocol servers enabling live browser verification during test generation (exploratory, recording, and healing modes).                         |
+| **Network-First Pattern**    | Testing pattern that waits for actual network responses instead of fixed timeouts to avoid race conditions and flakiness.                                     |
+| **NFR Assessment**           | Validation of non-functional requirements (security, performance, reliability, maintainability) with evidence-based decisions.                                |
+| **Playwright Utils**         | Optional package (`@seontechnologies/playwright-utils`) providing production-ready fixtures and utilities for Playwright tests.                               |
+| **Risk-Based Testing**       | Testing approach where depth scales with business impact using probability × impact scoring (1-9 scale).                                                      |
+| **System-Level Test Design** | Test planning at architecture level (Phase 3) focusing on testability review, ADR mapping, and test infrastructure needs.                                     |
+| **tea-index.csv**            | Manifest file tracking all knowledge fragments, their descriptions, tags, and which workflows load them.                                                      |
+| **TEA Integrated**           | Full BMad Method integration with TEA workflows across all phases (Phase 2, 3, 4, and Release Gate).                                                          |
+| **TEA Lite**                 | Beginner approach using just `automate` to test existing features (simplest way to use TEA).                                                        |
+| **TEA Solo**                 | Standalone engagement model using TEA without full BMad Method integration (bring your own requirements).                                                     |
+| **Test Priorities**          | Classification system for test importance: P0 (critical path), P1 (high value), P2 (medium value), P3 (low value).                                            |
+
+---
+
+## See Also
+
+- [TEA Overview](/docs/tea/explanation/tea-overview.md) - Complete TEA capabilities
+- [TEA Knowledge Base](/docs/tea/reference/knowledge-base.md) - Fragment index
+- [TEA Command Reference](/docs/tea/reference/commands.md) - Workflow reference
+- [TEA Configuration](/docs/tea/reference/configuration.md) - Config options
+
+---
+
+Generated with [BMad Method](https://bmad-method.org)