bmad-enhanced 1.3.1 → 1.3.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +624 -0
- package/UPDATE-GUIDE.md +378 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/agents/contextualization-expert.md +100 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/agents/lean-experiments-specialist.md +118 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/empathy-map.template.md +143 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-01-define-user.md +60 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-02-says-thinks.md +67 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-03-does-feels.md +79 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-04-pain-points.md +87 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-05-gains.md +103 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +104 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/validate.md +117 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/workflow.md +44 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-01-define-requirements.md +85 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-02-user-flows.md +59 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-03-information-architecture.md +68 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-04-wireframe-sketch.md +97 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-05-components.md +128 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +83 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/wireframe.template.md +287 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/workflow.md +44 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/contextualize-scope.template.md +67 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-01-list-opportunities.md +47 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-02-define-criteria.md +36 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-03-evaluate-opportunities.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-04-define-boundaries.md +32 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-05-validate-fit.md +28 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/workflow.md +59 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/lean-experiment.template.md +29 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-01.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-02.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-03.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-04.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-05.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-06.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/workflow.md +26 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/lean-persona.template.md +163 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-01-define-job.md +72 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-02-current-solution.md +83 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-03-problem-contexts.md +90 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-04-forces-anxieties.md +98 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-05-success-criteria.md +103 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +116 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/workflow.md +50 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/mvp.template.md +40 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-01-riskiest-assumption.md +17 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-02-success-criteria.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-03-smallest-test.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-04-scope-features.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-05-build-measure-learn.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/workflow.md +36 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/product-vision.template.md +147 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-01-define-problem.md +89 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-02-target-market.md +91 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-03-unique-approach.md +87 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-04-future-state.md +100 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-05-principles.md +92 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +155 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/workflow.md +55 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/proof-of-concept.template.md +25 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-01.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-02.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-03.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-04.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-05.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-06.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/workflow.md +26 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/proof-of-value.template.md +29 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-01.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-02.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-03.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-04.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-05.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-06.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/workflow.md +26 -0
- package/_bmad-output/vortex-artifacts/EMMA-USER-GUIDE.md +450 -0
- package/_bmad-output/vortex-artifacts/WADE-USER-GUIDE.md +471 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
artifact: wireframe
|
|
3
|
+
version: 1.0.0
|
|
4
|
+
created: {date}
|
|
5
|
+
screen: {screen_name}
|
|
6
|
+
platform: {platform}
|
|
7
|
+
author: Wade (lean-experiments-specialist)
|
|
8
|
+
---
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
# Wireframe: {screen_name}
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
**Platform:** {platform}
|
|
13
|
+
**Target User:** {target_user}
|
|
14
|
+
**Created:** {date}
|
|
15
|
+
**Designer:** Wade (lean-experiments-specialist)
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
---
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Executive Summary
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
**Screen Purpose:** {primary_action}
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
**Key Design Decisions:**
|
|
24
|
+
- {decision_1}
|
|
25
|
+
- {decision_2}
|
|
26
|
+
- {decision_3}
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
**Target Breakpoints:**
|
|
29
|
+
- Mobile: 375px (primary focus for mobile-first)
|
|
30
|
+
- Tablet: 768px
|
|
31
|
+
- Desktop: 1024px+
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
**Accessibility Compliance:** WCAG 2.1 Level AA
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
---
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## 1. Requirements
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### Screen Information
|
|
40
|
+
- **Screen Name:** {screen_name}
|
|
41
|
+
- **Platform:** {platform}
|
|
42
|
+
- **Target User:** {target_user}
|
|
43
|
+
- **Primary Action:** {primary_action}
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### Constraints
|
|
46
|
+
{constraints}
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### Success Criteria
|
|
49
|
+
{success_criteria}
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
---
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
## 2. User Flows
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
### Entry Points
|
|
56
|
+
{entry_points}
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### Happy Path
|
|
59
|
+
{happy_path}
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### Alternative Flows
|
|
62
|
+
{alternative_flows}
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### Exit Points
|
|
65
|
+
{exit_points}
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
---
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## 3. Information Architecture
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Visual Hierarchy
|
|
72
|
+
1. **Primary (Hero):** {primary_content}
|
|
73
|
+
2. **Secondary (Supporting):** {secondary_content}
|
|
74
|
+
3. **Tertiary (Metadata):** {tertiary_content}
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
### Content Grouping
|
|
77
|
+
{content_grouping}
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### Navigation Patterns
|
|
80
|
+
{navigation_patterns}
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
### Information Density
|
|
83
|
+
- **Mobile:** {mobile_density}
|
|
84
|
+
- **Desktop:** {desktop_density}
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
---
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## 4. Wireframe Sketches
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
### Mobile View (375px)
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
```
|
|
93
|
+
{mobile_wireframe_ascii}
|
|
94
|
+
```
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**Annotations:**
|
|
97
|
+
- {mobile_annotation_1}
|
|
98
|
+
- {mobile_annotation_2}
|
|
99
|
+
- {mobile_annotation_3}
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
### Desktop View (1024px+)
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
```
|
|
104
|
+
{desktop_wireframe_ascii}
|
|
105
|
+
```
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**Annotations:**
|
|
108
|
+
- {desktop_annotation_1}
|
|
109
|
+
- {desktop_annotation_2}
|
|
110
|
+
- {desktop_annotation_3}
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
---
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
## 5. Component Specifications
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
### Component Library
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
{component_specifications}
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
**Example Component Detail:**
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
#### {component_name}
|
|
123
|
+
- **Type:** {component_type}
|
|
124
|
+
- **Location:** {component_location}
|
|
125
|
+
- **Size:** {component_size}
|
|
126
|
+
- **States:** {component_states}
|
|
127
|
+
- **Behavior:** {component_behavior}
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
---
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## 6. Interaction Design
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
### Interactive Elements
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
{interactive_elements}
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
### States & Feedback
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
{states_feedback}
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
### Gestures & Input
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
**Mobile:**
|
|
144
|
+
- {mobile_gesture_1}
|
|
145
|
+
- {mobile_gesture_2}
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
**Desktop:**
|
|
148
|
+
- {desktop_interaction_1}
|
|
149
|
+
- {desktop_interaction_2}
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
---
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
## 7. Responsive Breakpoints
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
### Breakpoint Strategy
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
| Breakpoint | Width | Layout Changes |
|
|
158
|
+
|------------|-------|----------------|
|
|
159
|
+
| Mobile | 375px | {mobile_layout_changes} |
|
|
160
|
+
| Tablet | 768px | {tablet_layout_changes} |
|
|
161
|
+
| Desktop | 1024px+ | {desktop_layout_changes} |
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
### Adaptive Patterns
|
|
164
|
+
{adaptive_patterns}
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
---
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
## 8. Accessibility Notes
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
### WCAG 2.1 Compliance
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
**Level AA Requirements:**
|
|
173
|
+
- {accessibility_requirement_1}
|
|
174
|
+
- {accessibility_requirement_2}
|
|
175
|
+
- {accessibility_requirement_3}
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
### Keyboard Navigation
|
|
178
|
+
{keyboard_navigation}
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
### Screen Reader Support
|
|
181
|
+
{screen_reader_support}
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
### Focus Management
|
|
184
|
+
{focus_management}
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
### Color Contrast
|
|
187
|
+
{color_contrast_notes}
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
---
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
## 9. Design Rationale
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
### Why This Layout?
|
|
194
|
+
{layout_rationale}
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
### Why This Information Hierarchy?
|
|
197
|
+
{hierarchy_rationale}
|
|
198
|
+
|
|
199
|
+
### Why These Components?
|
|
200
|
+
{component_rationale}
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
### Trade-offs Considered
|
|
203
|
+
{tradeoffs}
|
|
204
|
+
|
|
205
|
+
---
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
## 10. Next Steps
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
### For High-Fidelity Design
|
|
210
|
+
- [ ] {hifi_step_1}
|
|
211
|
+
- [ ] {hifi_step_2}
|
|
212
|
+
- [ ] {hifi_step_3}
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### For Prototyping
|
|
215
|
+
- [ ] {prototype_step_1}
|
|
216
|
+
- [ ] {prototype_step_2}
|
|
217
|
+
- [ ] {prototype_step_3}
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
### For Development
|
|
220
|
+
- [ ] {dev_step_1}
|
|
221
|
+
- [ ] {dev_step_2}
|
|
222
|
+
- [ ] {dev_step_3}
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
### For User Testing
|
|
225
|
+
- [ ] {testing_step_1}
|
|
226
|
+
- [ ] {testing_step_2}
|
|
227
|
+
- [ ] {testing_step_3}
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
---
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
## Appendix
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
### Grid System
|
|
234
|
+
- **Mobile:** 8pt grid, 16px margins
|
|
235
|
+
- **Desktop:** 12-column grid, 24px gutters
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
237
|
+
### Typography Scale
|
|
238
|
+
- **H1:** 24-32px (Screen title)
|
|
239
|
+
- **H2:** 20-24px (Section headers)
|
|
240
|
+
- **Body:** 16px (Content text)
|
|
241
|
+
- **Caption:** 12-14px (Metadata)
|
|
242
|
+
|
|
243
|
+
### Spacing System
|
|
244
|
+
- **XS:** 4px
|
|
245
|
+
- **S:** 8px
|
|
246
|
+
- **M:** 16px
|
|
247
|
+
- **L:** 24px
|
|
248
|
+
- **XL:** 32px
|
|
249
|
+
- **XXL:** 48px
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
### Component Heights
|
|
252
|
+
- **Header:** 56-72px
|
|
253
|
+
- **Bottom Navigation:** 48-72px
|
|
254
|
+
- **Button:** 44-48px (mobile), 36-40px (desktop)
|
|
255
|
+
- **Input Field:** 44-48px (mobile), 36-40px (desktop)
|
|
256
|
+
- **List Item:** 56-72px
|
|
257
|
+
|
|
258
|
+
---
|
|
259
|
+
|
|
260
|
+
**Document Version:** 1.0.0
|
|
261
|
+
**Last Updated:** {date}
|
|
262
|
+
**Designer:** Wade (lean-experiments-specialist)
|
|
263
|
+
**Status:** Draft for Review
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
---
|
|
266
|
+
|
|
267
|
+
## Document Control
|
|
268
|
+
|
|
269
|
+
**Change History:**
|
|
270
|
+
|
|
271
|
+
| Version | Date | Changes | Author |
|
|
272
|
+
|---------|------|---------|--------|
|
|
273
|
+
| 1.0.0 | {date} | Initial wireframe created | Wade |
|
|
274
|
+
|
|
275
|
+
**Approvals Required:**
|
|
276
|
+
- [ ] Product Manager
|
|
277
|
+
- [ ] UX Lead
|
|
278
|
+
- [ ] Engineering Lead
|
|
279
|
+
- [ ] Accessibility Specialist
|
|
280
|
+
|
|
281
|
+
---
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
**Questions or Feedback?**
|
|
284
|
+
|
|
285
|
+
Contact the design team or leave comments in this document.
|
|
286
|
+
|
|
287
|
+
Great work! This wireframe provides a solid foundation for your design and development. 🎨
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
3
|
+
type: step-file
|
|
4
|
+
description: Create wireframes through structured 6-step process
|
|
5
|
+
author: Wade (lean-experiments-specialist)
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Create Wireframe Workflow
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
This workflow guides you through creating comprehensive wireframes for web or mobile applications.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## What is a Wireframe?
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
A wireframe is a low-fidelity visual representation of a user interface. It defines the structure, layout, and functionality of screens without focusing on visual design details like colors or fonts. Wireframes answer: Where am I? What can I do? Where can I go?
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Workflow Structure
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
**Step-file architecture:**
|
|
19
|
+
- Just-in-time loading (each step loads only when needed)
|
|
20
|
+
- Sequential enforcement (must complete step N before step N+1)
|
|
21
|
+
- State tracking in frontmatter (progress preserved)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Steps Overview
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
1. **Define Requirements** - What screen, platform, user, functionality?
|
|
26
|
+
2. **User Flows** - How do users navigate? Entry → Goal → Exit
|
|
27
|
+
3. **Information Architecture** - How is content organized and prioritized?
|
|
28
|
+
4. **Wireframe Sketch** - Create layout using ASCII art and grids
|
|
29
|
+
5. **Components & Interactions** - Specify UI components, states, behaviors
|
|
30
|
+
6. **Synthesize** - Create the final wireframe artifact
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Output
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
**Artifact:** Wireframe markdown file in `{output_folder}/wireframe-{screen-name}-{date}.md`
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
**Template:** Uses [wireframe.template.md](wireframe.template.md)
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
---
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## INITIALIZATION
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/config.yaml
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
Load step: {project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/wireframe/steps/step-01-define-requirements.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
title: "Scope Decision: {scope-name}"
|
|
3
|
+
date: {date}
|
|
4
|
+
created-by: {user-name} with Emma (contextualization-expert)
|
|
5
|
+
type: scope-decision
|
|
6
|
+
status: DECIDED
|
|
7
|
+
version: 1.0
|
|
8
|
+
---
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
# Scope Decision: {scope-name}
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Decision Summary
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
**Selected Problem Space:** {selected-scope}
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
**Rationale:** {selection-rationale}
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
**De-scoped (Not Now):** {descoped-problems}
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
---
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Problem Opportunities Considered
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
{opportunities-list}
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
---
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Evaluation Criteria
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
{criteria-list}
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
---
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Scoring Matrix
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
{scoring-matrix}
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
---
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Selected Scope
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### Problem Space
|
|
43
|
+
{problem-space}
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### Boundaries (What's In)
|
|
46
|
+
{scope-in}
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### Boundaries (What's Out)
|
|
49
|
+
{scope-out}
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
---
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
## Strategic Fit
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
{strategic-fit-analysis}
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
---
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
## Next Steps
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
{next-steps}
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
---
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**Created with:** BMAD-Enhanced v1.2.0 - Vortex Framework (Contextualize Stream)
|
|
66
|
+
**Agent:** Emma (Contextualization Expert)
|
|
67
|
+
**Workflow:** contextualize-scope
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 1
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
4
|
+
title: List Problem Opportunities
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 1: List Problem Opportunities
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
What problems could you solve? Let's get them all on the table before deciding.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Why This Matters
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
You can't make a good decision without seeing all options. Listing opportunities ensures you don't miss something important.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
List 3-7 problem opportunities you could investigate. For each, provide:
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
### 1. Problem name (short label)
|
|
20
|
+
### 2. Problem description (1-2 sentences)
|
|
21
|
+
### 3. Who experiences this problem?
|
|
22
|
+
### 4. Rough market size estimate
|
|
23
|
+
### 5. Initial gut feeling (High/Medium/Low interest)
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Example
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
**Opportunity A: Team Status Visibility**
|
|
28
|
+
- Remote managers lack real-time visibility into distributed team progress
|
|
29
|
+
- Managers of 5-20 person distributed software teams
|
|
30
|
+
- ~2M teams globally, $15B TAM
|
|
31
|
+
- Interest: HIGH
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
**Opportunity B: Meeting Overload**
|
|
34
|
+
- Teams waste 10+ hours/week in unnecessary meetings
|
|
35
|
+
- Knowledge workers at companies 50-500 employees
|
|
36
|
+
- ~10M workers globally, $50B TAM
|
|
37
|
+
- Interest: MEDIUM
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
List your problem opportunities.
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-02-define-criteria.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 2
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
4
|
+
title: Define Evaluation Criteria
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 2: Define Evaluation Criteria
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
How will you decide which problem to pursue?
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Define 3-5 criteria for evaluating opportunities. Common criteria:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
- **Impact:** How many people does this affect? How painful is it?
|
|
16
|
+
- **Feasibility:** Can we actually build this? Do we have the expertise?
|
|
17
|
+
- **Strategic Fit:** Does this align with our vision and strengths?
|
|
18
|
+
- **Market Opportunity:** Size of market? Willingness to pay?
|
|
19
|
+
- **Time to Value:** How quickly can we validate this?
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Example
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
1. **Impact** (Weight: 30%) - Number of users × problem intensity
|
|
24
|
+
2. **Feasibility** (Weight: 25%) - Team expertise + technical complexity
|
|
25
|
+
3. **Strategic Fit** (Weight: 25%) - Alignment with long-term vision
|
|
26
|
+
4. **Speed to Validation** (Weight: 20%) - Can we test this in <3 months?
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
---
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
Define your evaluation criteria with weights.
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-03-evaluate-opportunities.md
|
package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-03-evaluate-opportunities.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 3
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
4
|
+
title: Evaluate Each Opportunity
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 3: Evaluate Each Opportunity
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Score each opportunity against your criteria.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
For each opportunity, score 1-10 on each criterion. Calculate weighted scores.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Example
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
| Opportunity | Impact | Feasibility | Strategic Fit | Speed | Total |
|
|
18
|
+
|------------|--------|-------------|---------------|-------|-------|
|
|
19
|
+
| Team Status| 9 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8.25 |
|
|
20
|
+
| Meetings | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6.45 |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
---
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
Score your opportunities.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-04-define-boundaries.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 4
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
4
|
+
title: Define Scope Boundaries
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 4: Define Scope Boundaries
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
What's IN scope? What's OUT?
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Define clear boundaries:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
### What's IN Scope
|
|
16
|
+
- Which user segment?
|
|
17
|
+
- Which use cases?
|
|
18
|
+
- Which geography/market?
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
### What's OUT of Scope
|
|
21
|
+
- What are you explicitly NOT solving?
|
|
22
|
+
- What's phase 2 or phase 3?
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
---
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
Define your scope boundaries.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-05-validate-fit.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 5
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
4
|
+
title: Validate Strategic Fit
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 5: Validate Strategic Fit
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Does this choice align with your vision, team, and resources?
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Validate fit across dimensions:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
1. **Vision Alignment:** Does this serve your product vision?
|
|
16
|
+
2. **Team Capabilities:** Do you have the skills to execute?
|
|
17
|
+
3. **Resource Requirements:** Can you afford to investigate this?
|
|
18
|
+
4. **Market Timing:** Is now the right time?
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
---
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Validate strategic fit.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-06-synthesize.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 6
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
4
|
+
title: Synthesize
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 6: Synthesize
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Create the final scope decision document.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Provide final decision summary:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
1. **Selected scope** and why
|
|
16
|
+
2. **De-scoped opportunities** and why not now
|
|
17
|
+
3. **Next steps** (suggested: lean-persona → mvp → lean-experiment)
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Workflow Complete
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
Next suggested workflows:
|
|
24
|
+
- **lean-persona** to understand your target user
|
|
25
|
+
- **Wade's mvp** to design your minimum viable product
|
|
26
|
+
- **Wade's lean-experiment** to validate assumptions
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
---
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
**Created with:** BMAD-Enhanced v1.2.0
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Validate Scope Decision
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Status:** Coming in v1.2.0
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Agent:** Emma (Contextualization Expert)
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Stream:** Contextualize
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Overview
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
This validation workflow helps you review scope decisions to ensure they're data-driven and strategically sound.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## What Gets Validated
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
- Are all relevant opportunities considered?
|
|
16
|
+
- Are evaluation criteria clear and measurable?
|
|
17
|
+
- Is scoring consistent across opportunities?
|
|
18
|
+
- Is the decision rationale well-documented?
|
|
19
|
+
- Are de-scoped opportunities captured for future reference?
|
|
20
|
+
- Does this align with product vision?
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Coming in v1.2.0
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
This validation workflow will be available alongside the contextualize-scope workflow in March 2026.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Questions?
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
For questions or to request early access:
|
|
29
|
+
- GitHub Issues: https://github.com/amalik/BMAD-Enhanced/issues
|
|
30
|
+
- Tag with: `workflow:contextualize-scope` and `v1.2.0`
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
workflow: contextualize-scope
|
|
3
|
+
type: step-file
|
|
4
|
+
description: Decide which problem space to investigate using strategic evaluation
|
|
5
|
+
author: Emma (contextualization-expert)
|
|
6
|
+
version: 1.2.0
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
# Contextualize Scope Workflow
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
This workflow guides you through deciding which problem space to investigate by evaluating opportunities systematically.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## What is Scope Contextualization?
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Scope contextualization is the strategic decision of where to focus your investigation. You likely have multiple problems you could solve - this workflow helps you choose wisely by:
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
- **Identifying all opportunities** - What problems are on the table?
|
|
18
|
+
- **Defining evaluation criteria** - What matters most (impact, feasibility, strategic fit)?
|
|
19
|
+
- **Scoring systematically** - Rate each opportunity against criteria
|
|
20
|
+
- **Deciding with rationale** - Choose one, document why
|
|
21
|
+
- **De-scoping intentionally** - Say "no" to others (for now)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Why This Matters
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
Choosing the wrong problem space wastes months of effort. This workflow ensures:
|
|
26
|
+
- You're solving a problem worth solving
|
|
27
|
+
- You pick the problem you can actually solve
|
|
28
|
+
- You don't spread resources across too many problems
|
|
29
|
+
- You can defend your choice with evidence
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Workflow Structure
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
**Step-file architecture:**
|
|
34
|
+
- Just-in-time loading (each step loads only when needed)
|
|
35
|
+
- Sequential enforcement (must complete step N before step N+1)
|
|
36
|
+
- State tracking in frontmatter (progress preserved)
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Steps Overview
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
1. **List Problem Opportunities** - What problems could you solve?
|
|
41
|
+
2. **Define Evaluation Criteria** - How will you choose?
|
|
42
|
+
3. **Evaluate Each Opportunity** - Score against criteria
|
|
43
|
+
4. **Define Scope Boundaries** - What's in? What's out?
|
|
44
|
+
5. **Validate Strategic Fit** - Does this align with vision/resources?
|
|
45
|
+
6. **Synthesize** - Create scope decision document
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Output
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
**Artifact:** Scope decision document in `{output_folder}/scope-decision-{scope-name}-{date}.md`
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
**Template:** Uses [contextualize-scope.template.md](contextualize-scope.template.md)
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
---
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
## INITIALIZATION
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/config.yaml
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
Load step: {project-root}/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-01-list-opportunities.md
|