bmad-enhanced 1.3.1 → 1.3.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +624 -0
- package/UPDATE-GUIDE.md +378 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/agents/contextualization-expert.md +100 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/agents/lean-experiments-specialist.md +118 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/empathy-map.template.md +143 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-01-define-user.md +60 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-02-says-thinks.md +67 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-03-does-feels.md +79 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-04-pain-points.md +87 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-05-gains.md +103 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +104 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/validate.md +117 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/empathy-map/workflow.md +44 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-01-define-requirements.md +85 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-02-user-flows.md +59 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-03-information-architecture.md +68 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-04-wireframe-sketch.md +97 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-05-components.md +128 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +83 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/wireframe.template.md +287 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/workflow.md +44 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/contextualize-scope.template.md +67 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-01-list-opportunities.md +47 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-02-define-criteria.md +36 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-03-evaluate-opportunities.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-04-define-boundaries.md +32 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-05-validate-fit.md +28 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/contextualize-scope/workflow.md +59 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/lean-experiment.template.md +29 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-01.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-02.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-03.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-04.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-05.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/steps/step-06.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-experiment/workflow.md +26 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/lean-persona.template.md +163 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-01-define-job.md +72 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-02-current-solution.md +83 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-03-problem-contexts.md +90 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-04-forces-anxieties.md +98 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-05-success-criteria.md +103 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +116 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/lean-persona/workflow.md +50 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/mvp.template.md +40 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-01-riskiest-assumption.md +17 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-02-success-criteria.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-03-smallest-test.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-04-scope-features.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-05-build-measure-learn.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +13 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/mvp/workflow.md +36 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/product-vision.template.md +147 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-01-define-problem.md +89 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-02-target-market.md +91 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-03-unique-approach.md +87 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-04-future-state.md +100 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-05-principles.md +92 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/steps/step-06-synthesize.md +155 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/product-vision/workflow.md +55 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/proof-of-concept.template.md +25 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-01.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-02.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-03.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-04.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-05.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/steps/step-06.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-concept/workflow.md +26 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/proof-of-value.template.md +29 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-01.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-02.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-03.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-04.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-05.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/steps/step-06.md +8 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/validate.md +30 -0
- package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/proof-of-value/workflow.md +26 -0
- package/_bmad-output/vortex-artifacts/EMMA-USER-GUIDE.md +450 -0
- package/_bmad-output/vortex-artifacts/WADE-USER-GUIDE.md +471 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
workflow: validate-empathy-map
|
|
3
|
+
type: single-file
|
|
4
|
+
description: Validate an existing empathy map against user research evidence
|
|
5
|
+
author: Emma (contextualization-expert)
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Validate Existing Empathy Map
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Bring me an empathy map and I'll help you validate it against user research evidence.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Why Validation Matters
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
Empathy maps lose value if they're based on assumptions instead of research. Validation ensures:
|
|
15
|
+
- Every insight traces back to evidence
|
|
16
|
+
- No speculation or "we think users want..."
|
|
17
|
+
- Team stays grounded in user reality
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Validation Process
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### 1. Evidence Check
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
For each insight in the empathy map, ask:
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
**Can you point to research that supports this?**
|
|
26
|
+
- Direct quote from interview?
|
|
27
|
+
- Observed behavior?
|
|
28
|
+
- Survey data?
|
|
29
|
+
- Analytics?
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
**Red Flags:**
|
|
32
|
+
- "We think users want..."
|
|
33
|
+
- "Users probably feel..."
|
|
34
|
+
- "Based on our internal discussions..."
|
|
35
|
+
- No citation to research source
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 2. Specificity Check
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**Is the target user specific enough?**
|
|
40
|
+
- ❌ "Mobile users"
|
|
41
|
+
- ❌ "Marketing professionals"
|
|
42
|
+
- ✅ "Marketing managers at mid-sized B2B companies managing lead generation"
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
**Are pain points concrete?**
|
|
45
|
+
- ❌ "Bad UX"
|
|
46
|
+
- ✅ "Campaign creation button hidden in nested menu (3 clicks deep)"
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
**Are gains measurable?**
|
|
49
|
+
- ❌ "Want to be more efficient"
|
|
50
|
+
- ✅ "Complete campaign setup in under 10 minutes vs. current 45 minutes"
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### 3. Completeness Check
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
**Did you explore all dimensions?**
|
|
55
|
+
- [ ] Says (direct quotes)
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] Thinks (inferred thoughts)
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Does (observable actions)
|
|
58
|
+
- [ ] Feels (emotional states)
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] Pains (obstacles/frustrations)
|
|
60
|
+
- [ ] Gains (desired outcomes)
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Did you capture both positive and negative?**
|
|
63
|
+
- Not just problems (pain points)
|
|
64
|
+
- Also aspirations (gains)
|
|
65
|
+
- Moments of delight AND frustration
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
### 4. Actionability Check
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
**Can designers use this?**
|
|
70
|
+
- Are pain points specific enough to inform design decisions?
|
|
71
|
+
- Are gains clear enough to prioritize features?
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
**Can product managers use this?**
|
|
74
|
+
- Can they defend feature decisions with user insights?
|
|
75
|
+
- Can they communicate user needs to stakeholders?
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
---
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
**Please share:**
|
|
82
|
+
1. The empathy map you want to validate (paste content or provide file path)
|
|
83
|
+
2. The research sources that informed it
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
I'll review it and provide:
|
|
86
|
+
- **Evidence gaps** - Insights lacking research support
|
|
87
|
+
- **Specificity issues** - Vague statements that need clarification
|
|
88
|
+
- **Missing dimensions** - Areas you didn't explore
|
|
89
|
+
- **Validation score** - Overall assessment (Strong / Needs Work / Speculative)
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
---
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
## Validation Criteria
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
**Strong Empathy Map:**
|
|
96
|
+
- ✅ Every insight backed by cited research
|
|
97
|
+
- ✅ Specific target user definition
|
|
98
|
+
- ✅ Concrete, measurable pain points and gains
|
|
99
|
+
- ✅ All 6 dimensions explored (Says, Thinks, Does, Feels, Pains, Gains)
|
|
100
|
+
- ✅ Both positive and negative aspects captured
|
|
101
|
+
- ✅ Actionable for designers and product managers
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
**Needs Work:**
|
|
104
|
+
- ⚠️ Some insights lack research support
|
|
105
|
+
- ⚠️ Target user could be more specific
|
|
106
|
+
- ⚠️ Pain points or gains are vague
|
|
107
|
+
- ⚠️ Missing some dimensions
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
**Speculative:**
|
|
110
|
+
- ❌ Many insights are assumptions
|
|
111
|
+
- ❌ No clear research sources
|
|
112
|
+
- ❌ "We think" instead of "Users said"
|
|
113
|
+
- ❌ Not actionable
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
---
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
Ready to validate your empathy map? Share it with me and I'll provide detailed feedback! 🎨
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
workflow: empathy-map
|
|
3
|
+
type: step-file
|
|
4
|
+
description: Create user empathy maps through structured 6-step process
|
|
5
|
+
author: Emma (contextualization-expert)
|
|
6
|
+
---
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
# Create Empathy Map Workflow
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
This workflow guides you through creating a comprehensive empathy map for a target user.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## What is an Empathy Map?
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
An empathy map is a collaborative visualization used to articulate what we know about a particular type of user. It externalizes knowledge about users to create a shared understanding and aid decision-making.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Workflow Structure
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
**Step-file architecture:**
|
|
19
|
+
- Just-in-time loading (each step loads only when needed)
|
|
20
|
+
- Sequential enforcement (must complete step N before step N+1)
|
|
21
|
+
- State tracking in frontmatter (progress preserved)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Steps Overview
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
1. **Define Target User** - Who are we creating this empathy map for?
|
|
26
|
+
2. **Says & Thinks** - What do they say aloud? What do they think?
|
|
27
|
+
3. **Does & Feels** - What actions do they take? What emotions do they feel?
|
|
28
|
+
4. **Pain Points** - What frustrates, blocks, or challenges them?
|
|
29
|
+
5. **Gains** - What do they want to achieve? What are their needs?
|
|
30
|
+
6. **Synthesize** - Create the final empathy map artifact
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Output
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
**Artifact:** Empathy map markdown file in `{output_folder}/empathy-map-{user-name}-{date}.md`
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
**Template:** Uses [empathy-map.template.md](empathy-map.template.md)
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
---
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## INITIALIZATION
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/config.yaml
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
Load step: {project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/empathy-map/steps/step-01-define-user.md
|
package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-01-define-requirements.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 1
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
4
|
+
title: Define Requirements
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 1: Define Requirements
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Before we create a wireframe, we need to understand exactly what we're building and why.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Why This Matters
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
A wireframe is only useful if it solves a real problem. Generic wireframes waste time. Specific wireframes (for a specific screen, user, and goal) accelerate design and development.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Answer these questions to define your wireframe requirements:
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
### 1. What are we wireframing?
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
- **Scope:** Single screen? User flow (multiple screens)? Full app?
|
|
22
|
+
- **Screen name:** What do you call this screen? (e.g., "Dashboard Home", "Checkout Flow", "Product Detail Page")
|
|
23
|
+
- **Platform:** Web (desktop)? Web (mobile)? Mobile app (iOS/Android)?
|
|
24
|
+
- **Viewport size:**
|
|
25
|
+
- Mobile: 375px width (iPhone standard)
|
|
26
|
+
- Tablet: 768px width
|
|
27
|
+
- Desktop: 1024px+ width
|
|
28
|
+
- Responsive: All of the above?
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### 2. Who is this for?
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
- **Target user:** Who will use this screen? (Reference an empathy map if available, e.g., "Sarah Chen from empathy-map-sarah-chen-2026-02-14.md")
|
|
33
|
+
- **User's primary goal:** What is the ONE thing users come here to do?
|
|
34
|
+
- **User's technical proficiency:** Tech-savvy? Average? Non-technical?
|
|
35
|
+
- **User context:** Are they rushed? Exploring? Completing a specific task?
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 3. What's the core functionality?
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- **Primary action:** The MAIN thing users do on this screen (e.g., "Check account balance")
|
|
40
|
+
- **Secondary actions:** Supporting tasks (e.g., "View recent transactions", "Transfer money")
|
|
41
|
+
- **Information displayed:** What data does the screen show? (e.g., "Balance, last 5 transactions, quick action buttons")
|
|
42
|
+
- **Data sources:** Where does the information come from? (APIs, databases, user input)
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### 4. Design constraints?
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
- **Existing design system?** Are you using Material Design, iOS Human Interface Guidelines, custom component library?
|
|
47
|
+
- **Brand guidelines?** Any must-have elements (logo placement, color scheme - high level only)
|
|
48
|
+
- **Technical constraints?** Third-party integrations, API limitations, performance requirements?
|
|
49
|
+
- **Accessibility requirements?** WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance? Screen reader support?
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## Example
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
```
|
|
54
|
+
Screen: Dashboard Home (Mobile Banking App)
|
|
55
|
+
Platform: Mobile app (iOS/Android)
|
|
56
|
+
Viewport: 375px width (mobile-first)
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
User: Sarah Chen (see empathy-map-sarah-chen-2026-02-14.md)
|
|
59
|
+
Primary Goal: Check account balance quickly
|
|
60
|
+
Technical Proficiency: Medium-high
|
|
61
|
+
Context: Rushed, 3-5 daily check-ins, sessions < 2 minutes
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
Primary Action: Check account balance
|
|
64
|
+
Secondary Actions: View recent transactions, quick transfer, pay bills
|
|
65
|
+
Information: Balance, last updated timestamp, 5 recent transactions, quick action buttons
|
|
66
|
+
Data Sources: Banking API (balance, transactions)
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
Constraints:
|
|
69
|
+
- Must support Face ID for authentication
|
|
70
|
+
- Follow iOS/Android platform patterns
|
|
71
|
+
- WCAG 2.1 Level AA (minimum 44px touch targets)
|
|
72
|
+
- Performance: Load balance in < 1 second
|
|
73
|
+
```
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
---
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
Please define your wireframe requirements using the structure above.
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
When you've defined your requirements and I've confirmed they're specific enough, I'll load:
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/wireframe/steps/step-02-user-flows.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 2
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
4
|
+
title: User Flows
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 2: User Flows
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Let's map how users navigate through your wireframe(s).
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Why This Matters
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Understanding user flows prevents designing dead-end screens or confusing navigation. Every screen needs clear entry points and exit points.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
### 1. Entry Points
|
|
18
|
+
How do users arrive at this screen?
|
|
19
|
+
- From home screen? From search? From notification?
|
|
20
|
+
- Deep link? QR code? Email link?
|
|
21
|
+
- What's their mental state? (rushing, exploring, completing task)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### 2. Primary Flow (Happy Path)
|
|
24
|
+
Map the ideal journey from entry to goal completion:
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
```
|
|
27
|
+
Entry → Action → Response → Goal Achieved
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Example:
|
|
31
|
+
```
|
|
32
|
+
Home Screen
|
|
33
|
+
↓ (Tap "Balance")
|
|
34
|
+
Face ID Authentication
|
|
35
|
+
↓ (Success)
|
|
36
|
+
Balance Display
|
|
37
|
+
↓ (Goal: See balance)
|
|
38
|
+
[Done] or Continue to Secondary Action
|
|
39
|
+
```
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### 3. Alternative Flows
|
|
42
|
+
What if...?
|
|
43
|
+
- User makes an error?
|
|
44
|
+
- Data is unavailable?
|
|
45
|
+
- Authentication fails?
|
|
46
|
+
- User wants to go back?
|
|
47
|
+
- User abandons the flow?
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
### 4. Exit Points
|
|
50
|
+
How do users leave?
|
|
51
|
+
- Goal completed → where next?
|
|
52
|
+
- Task abandoned → how to recover?
|
|
53
|
+
- Navigation to related features?
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
When you've mapped user flows, I'll load:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/wireframe/steps/step-03-information-architecture.md
|
package/_bmad/bme/_vortex/workflows/_deprecated/wireframe/steps/step-03-information-architecture.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 3
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
4
|
+
title: Information Architecture
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 3: Information Architecture
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Let's organize content and UI elements hierarchically.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Your Task
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### 1. Content Priority (Visual Hierarchy)
|
|
14
|
+
What's most important on this screen?
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
**Primary (above the fold, largest/boldest):**
|
|
17
|
+
- The ONE thing users came here to see/do
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
**Secondary (mid-screen, medium emphasis):**
|
|
20
|
+
- Supporting information and actions
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
**Tertiary (below fold or subtle):**
|
|
23
|
+
- Metadata, help text, less critical features
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
### 2. Grouping
|
|
26
|
+
How to organize related elements?
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- **Visual grouping:** Cards? Sections? Accordions?
|
|
29
|
+
- **Logical grouping:** By task? By time? By category?
|
|
30
|
+
- **Separation:** Spacing? Dividers? Background colors?
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 3. Navigation
|
|
33
|
+
How do users move around?
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- **Primary nav:** Top bar? Bottom tabs? Sidebar? Hamburger menu?
|
|
36
|
+
- **Secondary nav:** Breadcrumbs? Tabs? Segmented controls?
|
|
37
|
+
- **Back/Close:** Where do these buttons go?
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### 4. Information Density
|
|
40
|
+
How much is too much?
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- **Progressive disclosure:** Show essentials, hide details until needed
|
|
43
|
+
- **Lazy loading:** Load more on scroll?
|
|
44
|
+
- **Pagination vs. infinite scroll**
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
## Example
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
```
|
|
49
|
+
Dashboard Screen (Mobile - 375px)
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
[Visual Hierarchy]
|
|
52
|
+
Primary: Account balance ($$$) - Hero section, centered, large
|
|
53
|
+
Secondary: Quick actions (3 buttons) - Mid section
|
|
54
|
+
Tertiary: Recent transactions (list) - Bottom, scrollable
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
[Grouping]
|
|
57
|
+
Section 1: Hero (balance + last updated)
|
|
58
|
+
Section 2: Quick Actions (3 icon buttons, horizontal)
|
|
59
|
+
Section 3: Activity (transaction list with "Load More")
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
[Navigation]
|
|
62
|
+
Bottom Tab Bar: [Home] [Accounts] [Cards] [Profile]
|
|
63
|
+
Top Bar: [Menu ☰] [Notifications 🔔]
|
|
64
|
+
```
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/wireframe/steps/step-04-wireframe-sketch.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 4
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
4
|
+
title: Wireframe Sketch
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 4: Wireframe Sketch
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Time to create the low-fidelity wireframe layout using ASCII art.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Grid System
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
- **Mobile:** 8pt grid, 16px margins
|
|
14
|
+
- **Desktop:** 12-column grid, 24px gutters
|
|
15
|
+
- **Alignment:** Everything snaps to grid
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## ASCII Wireframe Syntax
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
```
|
|
20
|
+
┌─────────────────────────────────┐ ← Top border
|
|
21
|
+
│ ☰ Menu Page Title 🔔 │ ← Header bar
|
|
22
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────┤ ← Section divider
|
|
23
|
+
│ │
|
|
24
|
+
│ Main Content Area │ ← Content section
|
|
25
|
+
│ │
|
|
26
|
+
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │ ← Button row
|
|
27
|
+
│ │ Btn1│ │ Btn2│ │ Btn3│ │
|
|
28
|
+
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
|
|
29
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
30
|
+
│ [Home] [Search] [Profile] │ ← Bottom nav
|
|
31
|
+
└─────────────────────────────────┘ ← Bottom border
|
|
32
|
+
```
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Component Placement
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
1. **Header** (56-72px height)
|
|
37
|
+
- Logo/back button (left)
|
|
38
|
+
- Page title (center)
|
|
39
|
+
- Actions/notifications (right)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
2. **Content area**
|
|
42
|
+
- Primary content (hero, main action)
|
|
43
|
+
- Secondary content (supporting info)
|
|
44
|
+
- Tertiary content (metadata, help)
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
3. **Navigation** (48-72px height)
|
|
47
|
+
- Bottom tabs (mobile)
|
|
48
|
+
- Sidebar (desktop)
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
## Typography Hierarchy
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
- **H1:** Screen title (24-32px)
|
|
53
|
+
- **H2:** Section headers (20-24px)
|
|
54
|
+
- **Body:** Content text (16px)
|
|
55
|
+
- **Caption:** Metadata (12-14px)
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
## Example: Mobile Dashboard
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
```
|
|
60
|
+
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
61
|
+
│ ☰ 🔔 │ ← Header (56px)
|
|
62
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
63
|
+
│ │
|
|
64
|
+
│ Account Balance │ ← H1 (Hero section)
|
|
65
|
+
│ $12,458.32 │ ← Large text
|
|
66
|
+
│ Last updated: 2 min ago │ ← Caption
|
|
67
|
+
│ │
|
|
68
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
69
|
+
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │ ← Quick Actions
|
|
70
|
+
│ │Trans│ │ Pay │ │Depo │ │ (3 buttons,
|
|
71
|
+
│ │ fer │ │Bills│ │sit │ │ 100×48px each)
|
|
72
|
+
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
|
|
73
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
74
|
+
│ Recent Transactions ↗ │ ← H2 + "See All"
|
|
75
|
+
│ ┌───────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
76
|
+
│ │ 🏪 Starbucks -$5.42 → │ │ ← Transaction item
|
|
77
|
+
│ └───────────────────────────┘ │ (64px height)
|
|
78
|
+
│ ┌───────────────────────────┐ │
|
|
79
|
+
│ │ 💰 Salary +$4,200 → │ │
|
|
80
|
+
│ └───────────────────────────┘ │
|
|
81
|
+
│ ... (3 more items) │
|
|
82
|
+
│ [Load More Transactions] │ ← Button
|
|
83
|
+
├─────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
84
|
+
│ [🏠] [💳] [📊] [👤] │ ← Bottom tabs (72px)
|
|
85
|
+
└─────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
Create your wireframe sketch using ASCII art. Include:
|
|
91
|
+
- Header, content area, navigation
|
|
92
|
+
- Component placements
|
|
93
|
+
- Size annotations (px)
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/wireframe/steps/step-05-components.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 5
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
4
|
+
title: Components & Interactions
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 5: Components & Interactions
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Let's specify UI components, their states, and interactive behaviors.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Component Library
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Document which components are used:
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**Buttons:**
|
|
16
|
+
- Primary CTA (main action)
|
|
17
|
+
- Secondary (supporting action)
|
|
18
|
+
- Tertiary/Text (less emphasis)
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
**Input Controls:**
|
|
21
|
+
- Text fields, dropdowns, checkboxes, radio buttons, toggles
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
**Data Display:**
|
|
24
|
+
- Cards, lists, tables, grids
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
**Feedback:**
|
|
27
|
+
- Toasts, alerts, modals, bottom sheets
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
**Progress:**
|
|
30
|
+
- Spinners, progress bars, skeleton screens
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Interaction Specifications
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
### Tap/Click Interactions
|
|
35
|
+
```
|
|
36
|
+
Element X → Action Y
|
|
37
|
+
Example:
|
|
38
|
+
- Tap "Transfer" button → Navigate to Transfer screen
|
|
39
|
+
- Tap transaction item → Show transaction details modal
|
|
40
|
+
- Pull to refresh → Reload balance and transactions
|
|
41
|
+
```
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### Gestures (Mobile)
|
|
44
|
+
```
|
|
45
|
+
- Swipe left on transaction → Delete (with confirmation)
|
|
46
|
+
- Swipe right on transaction → Mark as reviewed
|
|
47
|
+
- Long press → Show context menu
|
|
48
|
+
- Pinch to zoom → (if applicable)
|
|
49
|
+
```
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### Keyboard (Desktop)
|
|
52
|
+
```
|
|
53
|
+
- Tab → Navigate between fields
|
|
54
|
+
- Enter → Submit/Next
|
|
55
|
+
- Esc → Cancel/Close modal
|
|
56
|
+
```
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
## Component States
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
For each interactive component, define:
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Button States:**
|
|
63
|
+
- Default (idle)
|
|
64
|
+
- Hover (desktop)
|
|
65
|
+
- Pressed/Active
|
|
66
|
+
- Disabled (greyed out)
|
|
67
|
+
- Loading (spinner)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
**Input Field States:**
|
|
70
|
+
- Empty (placeholder visible)
|
|
71
|
+
- Focused (cursor visible, border highlighted)
|
|
72
|
+
- Filled (user input present)
|
|
73
|
+
- Error (validation failed, show error message)
|
|
74
|
+
- Disabled
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
**Screen States:**
|
|
77
|
+
- Loading (skeleton/spinner)
|
|
78
|
+
- Empty (no data, show empty state illustration)
|
|
79
|
+
- Error (failed to load, show retry button)
|
|
80
|
+
- Success (data loaded, normal display)
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
## Responsive Breakpoints
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
### Mobile (320px - 767px)
|
|
85
|
+
- Single column layout
|
|
86
|
+
- Stack buttons vertically
|
|
87
|
+
- Bottom navigation
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
### Tablet (768px - 1023px)
|
|
90
|
+
- Two-column layout possible
|
|
91
|
+
- Buttons side-by-side
|
|
92
|
+
- Bottom or side navigation
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
### Desktop (1024px+)
|
|
95
|
+
- Multi-column layouts
|
|
96
|
+
- Sidebar navigation
|
|
97
|
+
- Hover states visible
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
## Example
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
```
|
|
102
|
+
[Components Used]
|
|
103
|
+
1. Button (Primary)
|
|
104
|
+
- Elements: "Transfer", "Pay Bills", "Deposit"
|
|
105
|
+
- Size: 100×48px, Border radius: 8px
|
|
106
|
+
- States: Default, Pressed, Disabled, Loading
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
2. Transaction List Item
|
|
109
|
+
- Layout: [Icon 32×32] [Name + Amount] [Arrow →]
|
|
110
|
+
- Height: 64px
|
|
111
|
+
- Tap → Transaction detail screen
|
|
112
|
+
- Swipe left → Delete with confirmation
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
[Interactions]
|
|
115
|
+
- Tap balance → Account details screen
|
|
116
|
+
- Tap quick action → Respective flow
|
|
117
|
+
- Pull to refresh → Reload (with spinner)
|
|
118
|
+
- Swipe transaction → Delete/Archive
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
[Responsive]
|
|
121
|
+
- Mobile (375px): Single column, stacked
|
|
122
|
+
- Tablet (768px): Two columns for quick actions
|
|
123
|
+
- Desktop (1024px+): Sidebar + main content
|
|
124
|
+
```
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Next Step
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
{project-root}/_bmad/bme/_designos/workflows/wireframe/steps/step-06-synthesize.md
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
step: 6
|
|
3
|
+
workflow: wireframe
|
|
4
|
+
title: Synthesize
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
# Step 6: Synthesize
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Time to bring it all together and create the final wireframe artifact!
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Why This Matters
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
We've gathered requirements, mapped user flows, designed information architecture, sketched wireframes, and specified components. Now we synthesize everything into a professional wireframe document that designers and developers can use.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## What I'll Create
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Using the template at `wireframe.template.md`, I'll generate your complete wireframe artifact with:
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
1. **Executive Summary** - Key design decisions at a glance
|
|
20
|
+
2. **Requirements** - What we're solving for
|
|
21
|
+
3. **User Flows** - How users navigate
|
|
22
|
+
4. **Information Architecture** - Content organization
|
|
23
|
+
5. **Wireframe Sketches** - ASCII art layouts
|
|
24
|
+
6. **Component Specifications** - Detailed component specs
|
|
25
|
+
7. **Interaction Design** - Behaviors and states
|
|
26
|
+
8. **Responsive Breakpoints** - Adaptive layouts
|
|
27
|
+
9. **Accessibility Notes** - WCAG compliance
|
|
28
|
+
10. **Design Rationale** - Why these decisions?
|
|
29
|
+
11. **Next Steps** - Handoff to high-fidelity design
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Output Location
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
**File:** `{output_folder}/wireframe-{screen-name}-{date}.md`
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Example: `wireframe-dashboard-home-2026-02-15.md`
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## Before I Generate
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Let me review all the information we've gathered:
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Requirements Checklist
|
|
42
|
+
- [ ] Screen name and platform defined
|
|
43
|
+
- [ ] Target user identified
|
|
44
|
+
- [ ] Primary action clear
|
|
45
|
+
- [ ] Constraints documented
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### Flow Checklist
|
|
48
|
+
- [ ] Entry points mapped
|
|
49
|
+
- [ ] Happy path defined
|
|
50
|
+
- [ ] Alternative flows considered
|
|
51
|
+
- [ ] Exit points clear
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Architecture Checklist
|
|
54
|
+
- [ ] Visual hierarchy established
|
|
55
|
+
- [ ] Content grouped logically
|
|
56
|
+
- [ ] Navigation patterns defined
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### Wireframe Checklist
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] ASCII sketch created
|
|
60
|
+
- [ ] Grid system followed
|
|
61
|
+
- [ ] Component placements clear
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
### Components Checklist
|
|
64
|
+
- [ ] All components identified
|
|
65
|
+
- [ ] Interactions specified
|
|
66
|
+
- [ ] States documented
|
|
67
|
+
- [ ] Responsive behavior defined
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
## Your Turn
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Please confirm you're ready for me to generate the final wireframe artifact, or let me know if we need to revise any section.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## What's Next After This?
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Once I create your wireframe artifact, you can:
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
1. **Validate with users** - Show the wireframe to users and get feedback
|
|
78
|
+
2. **Share with team** - Get stakeholder alignment on structure
|
|
79
|
+
3. **Create high-fidelity designs** - Use this as foundation for visual design
|
|
80
|
+
4. **Prototype** - Build interactive prototype from wireframe
|
|
81
|
+
5. **Develop** - Hand off to developers with clear specifications
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Great work! This wireframe will be a solid foundation for your design and development. 🎨
|