aiox-core 5.0.5 → 5.0.8

package/pro/squads/design/tasks/designops-metrics-setup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,465 @@
+# designops-metrics-setup
+
+> Establish DesignOps KPIs and measurement systems using Dave Malouf's three-layer Metrics Stack framework.
+
+## Overview
+
+This task guides the establishment of a comprehensive DesignOps measurement system. Following Malouf's principle: "Measure at all three levels: output, outcome, impact." The goal is to connect design work to business results while avoiding the trap of measuring activity without value.
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+- Basic understanding of current design operations
+- Access to existing data sources (project tools, HR systems, etc.)
+- Stakeholder alignment on what success looks like
+- Tools or willingness to implement tracking
+
+## Malouf Framework Reference
+
+### The Metrics Stack
+```
+               IMPACT METRICS
+              (Business Value)
+                    |
+             OUTCOME METRICS
+           (Quality & Effectiveness)
+                    |
+              OUTPUT METRICS
+           (Activity & Deliverables)
+```
+
+### Core Principle
+> "You can't improve what you don't measure - but also, not everything needs measuring."
+
+### Metrics by Three Lenses
+| Lens | Output Examples | Outcome Examples | Impact Examples |
+|------|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|
+| How We Work | Throughput, cycle time | Quality, handoff success | Time to market |
+| How We Grow | Hiring velocity, training hours | Retention, time to productivity | Talent attraction |
+| How We Thrive | Community participation | Satisfaction scores | Design influence |
+
+## Task Steps
+
+### Phase 1: Define What to Measure
+
+```yaml
+step: 1
+name: "Identify Measurement Goals"
+questions:
+  business:
+    - "What does leadership need to know about design?"
+    - "How is design success currently perceived?"
+    - "What decisions need data support?"
+  operational:
+    - "What operational improvements are we targeting?"
+    - "Where do we suspect inefficiencies?"
+    - "What processes are we trying to optimize?"
+  team:
+    - "How do we know if the team is healthy?"
+    - "What indicators suggest problems?"
+    - "How do we track growth and development?"
+
+goal_template: |
+  ## MEASUREMENT GOALS
+
+  ### Business Questions We Need to Answer
+  1. [Question]: Required data: [data]
+  2. [Question]: Required data: [data]
+
+  ### Operational Questions We Need to Answer
+  1. [Question]: Required data: [data]
+  2. [Question]: Required data: [data]
+
+  ### Team Health Questions We Need to Answer
+  1. [Question]: Required data: [data]
+  2. [Question]: Required data: [data]
+```
+
+### Phase 2: Select Output Metrics
+
+```yaml
+step: 2
+name: "Define Output Metrics"
+description: "What the team produces - activity and deliverables"
+cadence: "Weekly or sprint-based"
+warning: "Output metrics alone can incentivize wrong behaviors"
+
+recommended_metrics:
+  process:
+    - name: "Design Throughput"
+      definition: "Number of design deliverables completed per sprint"
+      target: "Consistent or improving trend"
+      collection: "Project management tool"
+
+    - name: "Time to First Design"
+      definition: "Days from brief to first design review"
+      target: "< 5 days for standard projects"
+      collection: "Project timestamps"
+
+    - name: "Design Iteration Cycles"
+      definition: "Number of major revisions per project"
+      target: "2-3 cycles (not 0, not 10+)"
+      collection: "Design tool version history"
+
+    - name: "Handoff Completion Rate"
+      definition: "% of handoffs with all required artifacts"
+      target: "> 95%"
+      collection: "Handoff checklist completion"
+
+  tools:
+    - name: "Tool Adoption Rate"
+      definition: "% of team using standard tools"
+      target: "> 95%"
+      collection: "License/login data"
+
+    - name: "Component Usage Rate"
+      definition: "% of designs using design system components"
+      target: "> 80%"
+      collection: "Design system analytics"
+
+    - name: "Asset Reuse Rate"
+      definition: "% of new designs reusing existing assets"
+      target: "> 60%"
+      collection: "Design system analytics"
+
+  growth:
+    - name: "Hiring Velocity"
+      definition: "Days from req open to offer accepted"
+      target: "< 45 days"
+      collection: "ATS data"
+
+    - name: "Training Hours"
+      definition: "Hours of training per designer per quarter"
+      target: "> 20 hours"
+      collection: "Learning system data"
+
+selection_template: |
+  ## SELECTED OUTPUT METRICS
+
+  | Metric | Definition | Target | Source | Owner |
+  |--------|------------|--------|--------|-------|
+  | [metric] | [definition] | [target] | [source] | [owner] |
+```
+
+### Phase 3: Select Outcome Metrics
+
+```yaml
+step: 3
+name: "Define Outcome Metrics"
+description: "What the team achieves - quality and effectiveness"
+cadence: "Monthly or quarterly"
+warning: "Outcome metrics need context"
+
+recommended_metrics:
+  design_quality:
+    - name: "Usability Test Success Rate"
+      definition: "% of designs passing usability testing"
+      target: "> 80%"
+      collection: "Research results"
+
+    - name: "Accessibility Compliance"
+      definition: "% of designs meeting WCAG AA"
+      target: "100%"
+      collection: "A11y audit results"
+
+    - name: "Handoff Acceptance Rate"
+      definition: "% of handoffs accepted without major rework"
+      target: "> 90%"
+      collection: "Dev feedback tracking"
+
+    - name: "Design Debt Ratio"
+      definition: "% of backlog that is design debt"
+      target: "< 20%"
+      collection: "Backlog analysis"
+
+  team_health:
+    - name: "Designer Satisfaction"
+      definition: "Satisfaction score from team survey"
+      target: "> 4/5 or > 40 NPS"
+      collection: "Quarterly survey"
+
+    - name: "Retention Rate"
+      definition: "% of designers staying > 2 years"
+      target: "> 80%"
+      collection: "HR data"
+
+    - name: "Time to Productivity"
+      definition: "Days for new hire to contribute independently"
+      target: "< 90 days"
+      collection: "Manager assessment"
+
+    - name: "Internal Promotion Rate"
+      definition: "% of senior roles filled internally"
+      target: "> 50%"
+      collection: "HR data"
+
+  collaboration:
+    - name: "Stakeholder Satisfaction"
+      definition: "PM/Eng satisfaction with design collaboration"
+      target: "> 4/5"
+      collection: "Quarterly survey"
+
+    - name: "Implementation Fidelity"
+      definition: "% of specs implemented as designed"
+      target: "> 85%"
+      collection: "QA assessment"
+
+selection_template: |
+  ## SELECTED OUTCOME METRICS
+
+  | Metric | Definition | Target | Source | Owner |
+  |--------|------------|--------|--------|-------|
+  | [metric] | [definition] | [target] | [source] | [owner] |
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Select Impact Metrics
+
+```yaml
+step: 4
+name: "Define Impact Metrics"
+description: "Business value created - strategic contribution"
+cadence: "Quarterly or annually"
+warning: "Impact metrics require cross-functional data and attribution"
+
+recommended_metrics:
+  business_value:
+    - name: "Design-Attributed Conversion"
+      definition: "Conversion improvement from design changes"
+      target: "Increasing trend"
+      collection: "A/B test results"
+
+    - name: "Development Cost Savings"
+      definition: "Dev cost avoided through design system reuse"
+      target: "Quantifiable savings"
+      collection: "Component usage x dev cost"
+
+    - name: "Time to Market Improvement"
+      definition: "Reduction in delivery time due to design efficiency"
+      target: "20-30% improvement"
+      collection: "Project timeline analysis"
+
+  customer_impact:
+    - name: "Customer Satisfaction (Design-related)"
+      definition: "NPS/CSAT changes tied to design updates"
+      target: "Positive contribution"
+      collection: "Customer feedback + release correlation"
+
+    - name: "Task Success Rate"
+      definition: "% of users completing key tasks"
+      target: "> 90%"
+      collection: "Analytics"
+
+    - name: "Support Ticket Reduction"
+      definition: "Reduction in UX-related support issues"
+      target: "Decreasing trend"
+      collection: "Support ticket analysis"
+
+  organizational:
+    - name: "Design Influence Score"
+      definition: "% of strategic decisions influenced by design"
+      target: "Increasing presence"
+      collection: "Leadership assessment"
+
+    - name: "Talent Attraction"
+      definition: "Quality and quantity of design applicants"
+      target: "> 50 qualified per role"
+      collection: "Recruiting metrics"
+
+selection_template: |
+  ## SELECTED IMPACT METRICS
+
+  | Metric | Definition | Target | Source | Owner |
+  |--------|------------|--------|--------|-------|
+  | [metric] | [definition] | [target] | [source] | [owner] |
+```
+
+### Phase 5: Build Data Collection
+
+```yaml
+step: 5
+name: "Establish Data Collection"
+approach: |
+  Start simple. Don't try to automate everything at once.
+  Manual collection is fine initially.
+
+data_sources:
+  - source: "Project Management Tool"
+    metrics: ["Throughput", "Cycle time", "Handoff tracking"]
+    integration: "[Jira/Asana/etc]"
+
+  - source: "Design Tool Analytics"
+    metrics: ["Component usage", "Asset reuse", "Version history"]
+    integration: "[Figma Analytics/etc]"
+
+  - source: "Surveys"
+    metrics: ["Satisfaction", "Stakeholder feedback", "Team health"]
+    integration: "[Survey tool]"
+    cadence: "Quarterly"
+
+  - source: "HR Systems"
+    metrics: ["Retention", "Hiring velocity", "Promotions"]
+    integration: "[HRIS]"
+
+  - source: "Product Analytics"
+    metrics: ["Task success", "Conversions", "Usage"]
+    integration: "[Analytics platform]"
+
+collection_plan_template: |
+  ## DATA COLLECTION PLAN
+
+  ### Automated Collection
+  | Metric | Source | Integration | Frequency |
+  |--------|--------|-------------|-----------|
+  | [metric] | [source] | [how] | [when] |
+
+  ### Manual Collection
+  | Metric | Source | Owner | Frequency |
+  |--------|--------|-------|-----------|
+  | [metric] | [source] | [who] | [when] |
+
+  ### Survey Collection
+  | Survey | Audience | Frequency | Metrics Collected |
+  |--------|----------|-----------|-------------------|
+  | [survey] | [who] | [when] | [list] |
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Create Reporting
+
+```yaml
+step: 6
+name: "Establish Reporting Cadence"
+cadences:
+  weekly:
+    audience: "Design team"
+    focus: "Output metrics"
+    format: "Dashboard or standup"
+  monthly:
+    audience: "Design leadership"
+    focus: "Output + Outcome metrics"
+    format: "Report or meeting"
+  quarterly:
+    audience: "Executive stakeholders"
+    focus: "Outcome + Impact metrics"
+    format: "Business review presentation"
+
+dashboard_template: |
+  ## DESIGNOPS METRICS DASHBOARD
+
+  ### Executive Summary (Monthly)
+
+  | Metric | This Period | Last Period | Trend | Target | Status |
+  |--------|-------------|-------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | [metric] | [value] | [value] | [+/-X%] | [target] | [emoji] |
+
+  ### How We Work
+
+  | Output Metrics | Value | Target | Status |
+  |----------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | Design throughput | [X] | [Y] | [status] |
+  | Cycle time | [X] days | [Y] days | [status] |
+
+  | Outcome Metrics | Value | Target | Status |
+  |-----------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | Handoff acceptance | [X]% | [Y]% | [status] |
+  | Implementation fidelity | [X]% | [Y]% | [status] |
+
+  ### How We Grow
+
+  | Output Metrics | Value | Target | Status |
+  |----------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | Time to hire | [X] days | [Y] days | [status] |
+  | Training hours | [X] hrs | [Y] hrs | [status] |
+
+  | Outcome Metrics | Value | Target | Status |
+  |-----------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | Time to productivity | [X] days | [Y] days | [status] |
+  | Retention rate | [X]% | [Y]% | [status] |
+
+  ### How We Thrive
+
+  | Output Metrics | Value | Target | Status |
+  |----------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | Community events | [X] | [Y] | [status] |
+  | Recognition given | [X] | [Y] | [status] |
+
+  | Outcome Metrics | Value | Target | Status |
+  |-----------------|-------|--------|--------|
+  | Designer satisfaction | [X]/5 | [Y]/5 | [status] |
+  | Engagement score | [X]% | [Y]% | [status] |
+
+  ### Impact Metrics (Quarterly)
+
+  | Metric | This Quarter | Last Quarter | YoY Change |
+  |--------|--------------|--------------|------------|
+  | [metric] | [value] | [value] | [+/-X%] |
+
+  ---
+
+  ### Narrative
+  [What the numbers mean - story behind the data]
+
+  ### Actions
+  [What we're doing based on this data]
+```
+
+## Malouf Principles Applied
+
+- **"Measure at all three levels"** - Output, Outcome, Impact stack
+- **"Activity is not value"** - Don't stop at output metrics
+- **"Connect design work to business results"** - Impact metrics essential
+- **"What story do your numbers tell?"** - Data needs narrative
+- **"Not everything needs measuring"** - Focus on what matters
+
+## Output Artifacts
+
+1. **Measurement Goals** - What we need to know and why
+2. **Metrics Catalog** - Selected metrics with definitions
+3. **Data Collection Plan** - Sources and methods
+4. **Dashboard Template** - Reporting format
+5. **Reporting Cadence** - Who sees what when
+
+## Common Mistakes to Avoid
+
+| Mistake | Why Bad | Instead |
+|---------|---------|---------|
+| Only output metrics | Incentivizes activity over value | Add outcome and impact |
+| Too many metrics | Analysis paralysis | Start with 5-10 key metrics |
+| No baseline | Can't show improvement | Measure before changing |
+| Data without story | Numbers don't drive action | Add narrative context |
+| Static metrics | Needs evolve | Review quarterly |
+
+## Metrics Maturity Journey
+
+| Level | Characteristics | Focus |
+|-------|-----------------|-------|
+| 1. Ad Hoc | No formal metrics | Establish any baseline |
+| 2. Basic | Output metrics tracked | Add consistency |
+| 3. Developing | Output + some outcome | Add outcome metrics |
+| 4. Mature | Full stack tracked | Connect to business |
+| 5. Optimized | Predictive, automated | Continuous improvement |
+
+## Related Tasks
+
+- `designops-maturity-assessment.md` - Use metrics to track maturity progress
+- `design-process-optimization.md` - Measure process improvements
+- `design-team-scaling.md` - Track scaling success
+
+## Related Checklists
+
+- `squads/design/checklists/designops-maturity-checklist.md`
+- `squads/design/checklists/design-team-health-checklist.md`
+- `squads/design/checklists/design-handoff-checklist.md`
+
+## Notes
+
+> "The purpose of metrics is not to have dashboards. The purpose is to make better decisions. If your metrics aren't driving decisions, you're measuring the wrong things."
+
+
+## Process Guards
+- **Execution Type:** `Hybrid`
+- **Dependencies:** depends_on: `[]` · enables: `[]` · workflow: `design-system`
+- **On Fail:** Stop execution, capture evidence, and return remediation steps before proceeding.
+
+## Success Criteria
+- [ ] Output artifact(s) generated and referenced.
+- [ ] Validation checks executed with evidence.
+- [ ] Next-step dependencies documented.

package/pro/squads/design/tasks/ds-agentic-audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# Audit DS Machine-Readability for AI Consumption
+
+> Task ID: brad-agentic-audit
+> Agent: Brad (Design System Architect)
+> Version: 1.0.0
+> **Execution Type:** `Agent`
+> **Dependencies:** depends_on: `[]` · enables: `[ds-agentic-setup]` · workflow: `agentic`
+
+## Description
+
+Calculate an AI-readiness score (0-100) for your design system by checking structured token formats, component API documentation, machine-parseable metadata, and MCP integration readiness. Outputs an AI-readiness score (0-100) with specific gaps and recommendations.
+
+## Output Schema
+- **produces:** `outputs/design-system/{project}/agentic/agentic-readiness-report.json`
+- **format:** JSON data
+- **consumed_by:** ds-agentic-setup
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+- Existing design system with components and/or tokens
+- Bash shell access for scanning
+- Read access to component source files
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Interactive Elicitation
+
+1. **Gather Parameters**
+   - Ask for DS root path (e.g., ./src/design-system, ./packages/ui)
+   - Detect component framework (React, Vue, Web Components)
+   - Confirm output directory (default: outputs/design-system/{project}/agentic/)
+
+2. **Validate Path**
+   - Check path exists and contains component files
+   - Count total component files
+
+### Steps
+
+1. **Check Token Format Against DTCG Spec**
+   - Check if tokens exist in W3C DTCG format ($value, $type, $description)
+   - Check for proprietary formats (Style Dictionary v3, custom JSON/YAML)
+   - Validate $description coverage (% of tokens with descriptions)
+   - Score: DTCG = 25pts, proprietary with descriptions = 15pts, no tokens = 0pts
+
+2. **Grep Component TypeScript Interfaces and JSDoc Coverage**
+   - Check for TypeScript interfaces/types on components
+   - Check for JSDoc/TSDoc on component props
+   - Check for enumerated variants (not open string props)
+   - Check for composition rules (documented children/slot types)
+   - Score: Full typed + documented = 25pts, partial = 10pts, none = 0pts
+
+3. **Count Storybook Stories and Documentation Files**
+   - Check for Storybook stories (.stories.tsx/.mdx files)
+   - Check for structured args/argTypes in stories
+   - Check for component README or MDX documentation
+   - Check for accessibility annotations (ARIA role docs)
+   - Score: Full coverage = 25pts, partial = 10pts, none = 0pts
+
+4. **Detect Build Pipeline and MCP Integration**
+   - Check for Storybook MCP addon
+   - Check for API doc generation (TypeDoc, Storybook autodocs)
+   - Check for token build pipeline (Style Dictionary, Terrazzo)
+   - Check for versioned token artifact publication
+   - Score: Full infra = 25pts, partial = 10pts, none = 0pts
+
+5. **Generate AI-Readiness Report**
+   - Calculate total score (0-100)
+   - List gaps by category with severity (critical/high/medium)
+   - Provide specific recommendations with effort estimates
+   - Save report to output directory
+   - Update .state.yaml
+
+## Output
+
+- `agentic-readiness-report.md` — Full assessment with score breakdown
+- Gap list with actionable recommendations
+- Priority roadmap to reach AI-ready status
+- `.state.yaml` updated with agentic audit results
+
+## Failure Handling
+
+- **DS root path contains no component files:** Exit with error "No component files found in {path}. Verify design system root."
+- **Cannot detect component framework:** Ask user to specify framework manually. Default to React patterns if no response
+- **Token format detection returns zero results:** Check for alternate token locations (config files, theme files, package.json). Report "No tokens found — score 0/25 for token format"
+- **Storybook not installed:** Score infrastructure and metadata as 0, recommend Storybook setup as critical gap
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- Score calculated accurately based on actual codebase scan
+- Every gap has a specific, actionable recommendation
+- Report includes quick wins (< 1 day effort) vs. strategic investments
+
+
+## Related Checklists
+
+- `squads/design/checklists/ds-component-quality-checklist.md`
+- `squads/design/checklists/ds-pattern-audit-checklist.md`
+
+## Process Guards
+- **On Fail:** Stop execution, capture evidence, and return remediation steps before proceeding.

package/pro/squads/design/tasks/ds-agentic-setup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+# Configure DS for Agentic AI Workflows
+
+> Task ID: brad-agentic-setup
+> Agent: Brad (Design System Architect)
+> Version: 1.0.0
+> **Execution Type:** `Agent`
+> **Dependencies:** depends_on: `[ds-agentic-audit]` · enables: `[]` · workflow: `agentic`
+
+## Description
+
+Configure your design system infrastructure for AI agent consumption. Ensures tokens are in W3C DTCG format, components have structured metadata, Storybook MCP addon is configured, and AI constraint rules are defined.
+
+## Input Schema
+- **requires:** Output from `ds-agentic-audit`
+- **format:** JSON data
+- **location:** `outputs/design-system/{project}/agentic/agentic-readiness-report.json`
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+- Design system with existing components
+- Node.js environment for Storybook
+- Completed *agentic-audit recommended (to know gaps)
+
+## Workflow
+
+### Interactive Elicitation
+
+1. **Gather Parameters**
+   - DS root path
+   - Storybook config location (if exists)
+   - Target: which AI tools will consume the DS (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot)
+
+2. **Confirm Scope**
+   - Show current state from *agentic-audit (if available)
+   - Confirm which gaps to address
+   - Prioritize: tokens first, then component metadata, then MCP
+
+### Steps
+
+1. **Ensure W3C DTCG Token Format**
+   - If tokens exist in proprietary format, generate migration script
+   - Add $description to all tokens missing descriptions
+   - Validate token file against DTCG spec
+   - Check: tokens.json has $value + $type + $description on every token AND validates against DTCG schema — abort with "DTCG validation failed: {N} tokens non-compliant"
+
+2. **Add Component Metadata**
+   - Generate TypeScript interfaces for components missing types
+   - Add JSDoc descriptions to undocumented props
+   - Enumerate variants (convert open strings to union types)
+   - Document composition rules (allowed children, slot types)
+   - Check: undocumented component count == 0 AND all props have TypeScript types + JSDoc — abort with "{N} components missing typed/documented APIs: {list}"
+
+3. **Configure Storybook MCP Addon**
+   - Install @storybook/addon-mcp (or equivalent)
+   - Configure addon to expose component stories as MCP tools
+   - Test MCP endpoint responds with component catalog
+   - Check: MCP endpoint responds with JSON containing component list with count > 0 — abort with "MCP addon not responding or returned empty data"
+
+4. **Generate AI Constraint Rules**
+   - Create .agentic-ds-config.yaml with:
+     - Allowed components list
+     - Forbidden patterns (no inline styles, no hardcoded values)
+     - Token usage rules (which tokens for which contexts)
+     - Composition rules (what can nest inside what)
+   - Check: .agentic-ds-config.yaml parses without errors AND component count in config == total component count — abort with "Config invalid or incomplete: {error}"
+
+5. **Generate Component API Docs**
+   - Configure auto-doc generation (TypeDoc or Storybook autodocs)
+   - Export component catalog as JSON artifact
+   - Version-pin the artifact
+   - Check: `test -f component-catalog.json` AND JSON contains all components with props listed — abort with "Catalog generation failed: {N} components missing"
+
+## Output
+
+- Updated tokens in W3C DTCG format
+- Component metadata (types, docs, composition rules)
+- Storybook MCP addon configured
+- `.agentic-ds-config.yaml` — AI constraint rules
+- `component-catalog.json` — Machine-readable component index
+- `.state.yaml` updated
+
+## Failure Handling
+
+- **DTCG validation failed:** If token format conversion produces invalid DTCG schema (missing $type, $value structure), abort with "DTCG validation failed: {N} tokens non-compliant. Review {list} and ensure $value/$type/$description present."
+- **MCP addon not responding:** If Storybook MCP endpoint returns empty or error after configuration, abort with "MCP addon not responding or returned empty data. Verify @storybook/addon-mcp installation and .storybook/main.js configuration."
+- **Component API undocumented:** If component count with missing TypeScript types or JSDoc exceeds 0, abort with "{N} components missing typed/documented APIs: {list}. Add TypeScript interfaces and JSDoc comments before proceeding."
+- **AI constraint rules incomplete:** If .agentic-ds-config.yaml component count does not match total component library count, abort with "Config invalid or incomplete: {N} components missing from constraint rules. Ensure all components listed with composition rules."
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+- All tokens have $value, $type, $description
+- All components have typed, documented APIs
+- MCP endpoint returns valid component data
+- AI constraint rules cover entire component library
+
+
+## Related Checklists
+
+- `squads/design/checklists/ds-component-quality-checklist.md`
+- `squads/design/checklists/ds-pattern-audit-checklist.md`
+
+## Process Guards
+- **On Fail:** Stop execution, capture evidence, and return remediation steps before proceeding.