agileflow 3.4.2 → 4.0.0-alpha.1

package/src/core/commands/code/api.md

@@ -1,297 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Multi-agent API design quality analysis with consensus voting for REST conventions, error handling, versioning, pagination, and documentation
-argument-hint: "[file|directory] [DEPTH=quick|deep|ultradeep|extreme] [FOCUS=conventions|errors|versioning|pagination|docs|all] [MODEL=haiku|sonnet|opus]"
-compact_context:
-  priority: high
-  preserve_rules:
-    - "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:code:api - Multi-agent API design quality analysis"
-    - "CRITICAL: Deploy analyzers IN PARALLEL in ONE message with multiple Task calls"
-    - "CRITICAL: Wait for all results before running consensus (use TaskOutput with block=true)"
-    - "CRITICAL: Severity scale: BREAKING | INCONSISTENT | GAP | POLISH"
-    - "MUST parse arguments: TARGET (file/dir), DEPTH (quick/deep/ultradeep), FOCUS (conventions|errors|versioning|pagination|docs|all)"
-    - "Pass consensus all analyzer outputs, let it synthesize the final report"
-  state_fields:
-    - target_path
-    - depth
-    - focus_areas
-    - analyzers_deployed
-    - findings_collected
----
-
-# /agileflow:code:api
-
-Deploy multiple specialized API quality analyzers in parallel to assess API design maturity, then synthesize results through consensus voting into a prioritized API Quality Report with a maturity score.
-
----
-
-## Quick Reference
-
-```
-/agileflow:code:api app/api/                                  # Analyze API routes (quick, all 5 analyzers)
-/agileflow:code:api . DEPTH=deep                               # Deep analysis - all severity levels
-/agileflow:code:api routes/ FOCUS=conventions,errors            # Focus on specific areas
-/agileflow:code:api . DEPTH=deep FOCUS=all                     # Comprehensive full audit
-/agileflow:code:api . DEPTH=ultradeep                           # Each analyzer in its own tmux session
-/agileflow:code:api src/api/ FOCUS=pagination                   # Check pagination only
-```
-
----
-
-## How It Works
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│                    /agileflow:code:api                       │
-│                                                              │
-│  1. Parse arguments (target, depth, focus)                   │
-│  2. Deploy analyzers IN PARALLEL                             │
-│  3. Collect all findings                                     │
-│  4. Run consensus coordinator to validate & score            │
-│  5. Generate API Quality Report with maturity score          │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
-   ┌────────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌──────┐
-   │Conventions │ │ Errors │ │ Versioning │ │ Pagination │ │ Docs │
-   └─────┬──────┘ └───┬────┘ └─────┬──────┘ └─────┬──────┘ └──┬───┘
-         │            │            │               │           │
-         └────────────┴────────────┼───────────────┴───────────┘
-                                   ▼
-                    ┌──────────────────────┐
-                    │  Consensus Coordinator│
-                    │  (validates, scores, │
-                    │   endpoint matrix)   │
-                    └──────────────────────┘
-```
-
----
-
-## Arguments
-
-| Argument | Values | Default | Description |
-|----------|--------|---------|-------------|
-| TARGET | file/directory | `.` | What to analyze |
-| DEPTH | quick, deep, ultradeep | quick | quick = BREAKING/INCONSISTENT only, deep = all severities, ultradeep = separate tmux |
-| FOCUS | conventions,errors,versioning,pagination,docs,all | all | Which analyzers to deploy |
-| MODEL | haiku, sonnet, opus | haiku | Model for analyzer subagents |
-
----
-
-## Step-by-Step Process
-
-### STEP 1: Parse Arguments
-
-```
-TARGET = first argument or current directory
-DEPTH = quick (default) or deep or ultradeep
-FOCUS = all (default) or comma-separated list
-```
-
-**Analyzer Selection**:
-
-| Condition | Analyzers Deployed |
-|-----------|-------------------|
-| `FOCUS=all` | All 5: conventions, errors, versioning, pagination, docs |
-| `FOCUS=conventions` | api-quality-analyzer-conventions only |
-| `FOCUS=errors` | api-quality-analyzer-errors only |
-| `FOCUS=versioning` | api-quality-analyzer-versioning only |
-| `FOCUS=pagination` | api-quality-analyzer-pagination only |
-| `FOCUS=docs` | api-quality-analyzer-docs only |
-
-**DEPTH behavior**:
-- `quick` (default): Focus on BREAKING and INCONSISTENT issues only.
-- `deep`: Include GAP and POLISH findings.
-- `ultradeep`: Spawn each analyzer as a separate Claude Code session in tmux.
-
-**ULTRADEEP mode** (DEPTH=ultradeep):
-1. Show cost estimate:
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js --audit=api --target=TARGET --focus=FOCUS --model=MODEL --dry-run
-   ```
-2. Confirm with user before launching
-3. Spawn sessions (use `--json` to capture trace ID):
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js --audit=api --target=TARGET --focus=FOCUS --model=MODEL --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON output to get `traceId`. Example: `{"ok":true,"traceId":"abc123ef",...}`
-4. Wait for all analyzers to complete:
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/lib/tmux-audit-monitor.js wait TRACE_ID --timeout=1800
-   ```
-   - Exit 0 = all complete (JSON results on stdout)
-   - Exit 1 = timeout (partial results on stdout, `missing` array shows what's left)
-   - To check progress without blocking: `node .agileflow/scripts/lib/tmux-audit-monitor.js status TRACE_ID`
-   - To retry stalled analyzers: `node .agileflow/scripts/lib/tmux-audit-monitor.js retry TRACE_ID`
-5. Parse `results` array from the JSON output. Pass all findings to consensus coordinator (same as deep mode).
-6. If tmux unavailable (spawn exits code 2), fall back to `DEPTH=deep` with warning
-
-**EXTREME mode** (DEPTH=extreme):
-Partition-based multi-agent audit. Instead of 1 analyzer per tmux window, the codebase is split into partitions and each partition runs ALL analyzers.
-1. Scan the target directory to understand the codebase structure:
-   - Use Glob to find top-level source directories
-   - Group related directories into 3-7 logical partitions (coherent domains: auth, api, ui, etc.)
-   - If user provided PARTITIONS=N (a number), split into exactly N partitions
-   - If user provided PARTITIONS=dir1,dir2,dir3, use those exact directories
-2. Show the partition plan and agent count to the user, confirm before launching:
-   Example: "5 partitions x 5 analyzers = 25 agents. Estimated cost: $X. Proceed?"
-3. Spawn sessions with partitions:
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js --audit=api --target=TARGET --depth=extreme --partitions=dir1,dir2,dir3 --model=MODEL --json
-   ```
-4. Wait and collect results (same as ultradeep - use tmux-audit-monitor.js)
-5. Run consensus on combined results from all partitions
-
-**PARTITIONS argument** (only used with DEPTH=extreme):
-| Value | Behavior |
-|-------|----------|
-| Not set | AI decides partitions (3-7 based on codebase size) |
-| `PARTITIONS=5` | AI creates exactly 5 partitions |
-| `PARTITIONS=src/auth,src/api,lib` | Use these exact directories |
-
-### STEP 2: Deploy Analyzers in Parallel
-
-**CRITICAL**: Deploy ALL selected analyzers in a SINGLE message with multiple Task calls.
-
-**Prompt template for each analyzer**:
-
-```
-TASK: Analyze the following code for {API_DOMAIN} quality issues.
-
-TARGET: {file_path or directory}
-DEPTH: {quick|deep}
-
-{For quick depth}: Focus on BREAKING and INCONSISTENT severity issues only. Skip polish items.
-{For deep depth}: Be comprehensive. Include GAP and POLISH findings.
-
-Read the target files and apply your analysis methodology.
-
-OUTPUT your findings in your standard format (FINDING-N with location, severity, confidence, endpoint, code, explanation, remediation).
-
-If no issues found, output: "No {API_DOMAIN} issues found in {TARGET}"
-```
-
-**Deploy all 5 analyzers** using these subagent types:
-- `api-quality-analyzer-conventions` - REST naming, HTTP methods, URL structure
-- `api-quality-analyzer-errors` - Error format, status codes, error handling
-- `api-quality-analyzer-versioning` - Breaking changes, deprecation, backward compat
-- `api-quality-analyzer-pagination` - Cursor/offset, limits, totals, collections
-- `api-quality-analyzer-docs` - OpenAPI coverage, examples, documentation
-
-### STEP 3: Collect Results
-
-Wait for all analyzers to complete using TaskOutput with `block=true`.
-
-### STEP 4: Run Consensus Coordinator
-
-Pass all analyzer outputs to the consensus coordinator:
-
-```xml
-<invoke name="Task">
-<parameter name="description">API quality audit consensus</parameter>
-<parameter name="prompt">You are the API Quality Consensus Coordinator.
-
-TARGET: {target_path}
-DEPTH: {depth}
-
-## Analyzer Outputs
-
-### Conventions Analyzer Results:
-{conventions_output}
-
-### Error Handling Analyzer Results:
-{errors_output}
-
-### Versioning Analyzer Results:
-{versioning_output}
-
-### Pagination Analyzer Results:
-{pagination_output}
-
-### Documentation Analyzer Results:
-{docs_output}
-
----
-
-Follow your consensus process:
-1. Detect API type (REST, GraphQL, gRPC, tRPC, Hybrid)
-2. Parse all findings into normalized structure
-3. Group related findings by endpoint
-4. Vote on confidence (CONFIRMED if 2+ agree, LIKELY if 1 with evidence)
-5. Filter by API type relevance
-6. Compute API Maturity Score (0-100)
-7. Generate endpoint matrix with quality grades
-8. Generate the final API Quality Report
-9. Save report to docs/08-project/api-audits/api-audit-{YYYYMMDD}.md
-</parameter>
-<parameter name="subagent_type">api-quality-consensus</parameter>
-</invoke>
-```
-
-### STEP 5: Present Results
-
-After consensus completes, show the report summary and offer next steps:
-
-```xml
-<invoke name="AskUserQuestion">
-<parameter name="questions">[{
-  "question": "API quality audit complete: Maturity Score [N]/100 ([rating]). [endpoints] endpoints analyzed. API type: [type].",
-  "header": "Next steps",
-  "multiSelect": false,
-  "options": [
-    {"label": "Fix [breaking] Breaking issues now (Recommended)", "description": "[top_issue_summary]"},
-    {"label": "Create stories for all findings", "description": "Track [breaking] breaking + [inconsistent] inconsistent items"},
-    {"label": "Re-run with DEPTH=deep", "description": "Current was quick - deep includes GAP and POLISH findings"},
-    {"label": "Save report and done", "description": "Report saved to docs/08-project/api-audits/"}
-  ]
-}]</parameter>
-</invoke>
-```
-
----
-
-<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
-## Compact Summary
-
-**Command**: `/agileflow:code:api` - Multi-agent API design quality analysis with consensus
-
-**Quick Usage**:
-```
-/agileflow:code:api app/api/                            # Quick scan (all 5 analyzers)
-/agileflow:code:api . DEPTH=deep                        # Comprehensive analysis
-/agileflow:code:api routes/ FOCUS=conventions,errors     # Specific areas
-```
-
-**What It Does**: Deploy API quality analyzers in parallel -> Each checks different API design aspects -> Consensus validates, computes maturity score, builds endpoint matrix -> API Quality Report
-
-**Analyzers (all 5)**:
-- `api-quality-analyzer-conventions` - REST naming, HTTP methods, URL structure, consistency
-- `api-quality-analyzer-errors` - Error format, status codes, error handling, validation feedback
-- `api-quality-analyzer-versioning` - Breaking changes, deprecation, backward compatibility
-- `api-quality-analyzer-pagination` - Collection endpoints, page sizes, metadata, consistency
-- `api-quality-analyzer-docs` - OpenAPI coverage, examples, request/response schemas
-
-**Severity Levels**:
-- BREAKING: Clients break or can't use the API correctly
-- INCONSISTENT: Mixed patterns across endpoints
-- GAP: Missing best practice or feature
-- POLISH: Minor improvement opportunity
-
-**Output**: `docs/08-project/api-audits/api-audit-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
-<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
-
----
-
-## Boundary Rules (No Overlap)
-
-- **vs code:security**: No injection, auth bypass, XSS - those are security domain
-- **vs code:performance**: No N+1 queries, slow endpoints - those are performance domain
-- **vs code:completeness**: No missing handlers or dead endpoints - those are completeness domain
-- **Focus on API design quality** - conventions, errors, versioning, pagination, documentation
-
----
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/agileflow:code:security` - Security vulnerability analysis (includes API security)
-- `/agileflow:code:performance` - Performance analysis (includes query optimization)
-- `/agileflow:code:completeness` - Completeness analysis (includes endpoint mismatches)
-- `/agileflow:docs` - Documentation synchronization

package/src/core/commands/code/architecture.md

@@ -1,297 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Multi-agent architecture health analysis with consensus voting for coupling, layering, complexity, anti-patterns, and circular dependencies
-argument-hint: "[file|directory] [DEPTH=quick|deep|ultradeep|extreme] [FOCUS=coupling|layering|complexity|patterns|circular|all] [MODEL=haiku|sonnet|opus]"
-compact_context:
-  priority: high
-  preserve_rules:
-    - "ACTIVE COMMAND: /agileflow:code:architecture - Multi-agent architecture health analysis"
-    - "CRITICAL: Deploy analyzers IN PARALLEL in ONE message with multiple Task calls"
-    - "CRITICAL: Wait for all results before running consensus (use TaskOutput with block=true)"
-    - "CRITICAL: Severity scale: STRUCTURAL | DEGRADED | SMELL | STYLE"
-    - "MUST parse arguments: TARGET (file/dir), DEPTH (quick/deep/ultradeep), FOCUS (coupling|layering|complexity|patterns|circular|all)"
-    - "Pass consensus all analyzer outputs, let it synthesize the final report"
-  state_fields:
-    - target_path
-    - depth
-    - focus_areas
-    - analyzers_deployed
-    - findings_collected
----
-
-# /agileflow:code:architecture
-
-Deploy multiple specialized architecture analyzers in parallel to assess structural health, then synthesize results through consensus voting into a prioritized Architecture Audit Report with a health score.
-
----
-
-## Quick Reference
-
-```
-/agileflow:code:architecture src/                               # Analyze src directory (quick, all 5 analyzers)
-/agileflow:code:architecture . DEPTH=deep                       # Deep analysis - all severity levels
-/agileflow:code:architecture src/ FOCUS=coupling,circular        # Focus on specific areas
-/agileflow:code:architecture . DEPTH=deep FOCUS=all              # Comprehensive full audit
-/agileflow:code:architecture . DEPTH=ultradeep                   # Each analyzer in its own tmux session
-/agileflow:code:architecture lib/ FOCUS=complexity               # Check complexity only
-```
-
----
-
-## How It Works
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
-│                /agileflow:code:architecture                  │
-│                                                              │
-│  1. Parse arguments (target, depth, focus)                   │
-│  2. Deploy analyzers IN PARALLEL                             │
-│  3. Collect all findings                                     │
-│  4. Run consensus coordinator to validate & score            │
-│  5. Generate Architecture Audit Report with health score     │
-└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
-   ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌────────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
-   │ Coupling │ │ Layering │ │ Complexity │ │ Patterns │ │ Circular │
-   └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ └─────┬──────┘ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘
-        │            │             │              │            │
-        └────────────┴─────────────┼──────────────┴────────────┘
-                                   ▼
-                    ┌──────────────────────┐
-                    │  Consensus Coordinator│
-                    │  (validates, scores, │
-                    │   generates report)  │
-                    └──────────────────────┘
-```
-
----
-
-## Arguments
-
-| Argument | Values | Default | Description |
-|----------|--------|---------|-------------|
-| TARGET | file/directory | `.` | What to analyze |
-| DEPTH | quick, deep, ultradeep | quick | quick = STRUCTURAL/DEGRADED only, deep = all severities, ultradeep = separate tmux |
-| FOCUS | coupling,layering,complexity,patterns,circular,all | all | Which analyzers to deploy |
-| MODEL | haiku, sonnet, opus | haiku | Model for analyzer subagents |
-
----
-
-## Step-by-Step Process
-
-### STEP 1: Parse Arguments
-
-```
-TARGET = first argument or current directory
-DEPTH = quick (default) or deep or ultradeep
-FOCUS = all (default) or comma-separated list
-```
-
-**Analyzer Selection**:
-
-| Condition | Analyzers Deployed |
-|-----------|-------------------|
-| `FOCUS=all` | All 5: coupling, layering, complexity, patterns, circular |
-| `FOCUS=coupling` | arch-analyzer-coupling only |
-| `FOCUS=layering` | arch-analyzer-layering only |
-| `FOCUS=complexity` | arch-analyzer-complexity only |
-| `FOCUS=patterns` | arch-analyzer-patterns only |
-| `FOCUS=circular` | arch-analyzer-circular only |
-
-**DEPTH behavior**:
-- `quick` (default): Focus on STRUCTURAL and DEGRADED issues only.
-- `deep`: Include SMELL and STYLE findings.
-- `ultradeep`: Spawn each analyzer as a separate Claude Code session in tmux.
-
-**ULTRADEEP mode** (DEPTH=ultradeep):
-1. Show cost estimate:
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js --audit=architecture --target=TARGET --focus=FOCUS --model=MODEL --dry-run
-   ```
-2. Confirm with user before launching
-3. Spawn sessions (use `--json` to capture trace ID):
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js --audit=architecture --target=TARGET --focus=FOCUS --model=MODEL --json
-   ```
-   Parse the JSON output to get `traceId`. Example: `{"ok":true,"traceId":"abc123ef",...}`
-4. Wait for all analyzers to complete:
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/lib/tmux-audit-monitor.js wait TRACE_ID --timeout=1800
-   ```
-   - Exit 0 = all complete (JSON results on stdout)
-   - Exit 1 = timeout (partial results on stdout, `missing` array shows what's left)
-   - To check progress without blocking: `node .agileflow/scripts/lib/tmux-audit-monitor.js status TRACE_ID`
-   - To retry stalled analyzers: `node .agileflow/scripts/lib/tmux-audit-monitor.js retry TRACE_ID`
-5. Parse `results` array from the JSON output. Pass all findings to consensus coordinator (same as deep mode).
-6. If tmux unavailable (spawn exits code 2), fall back to `DEPTH=deep` with warning
-
-**EXTREME mode** (DEPTH=extreme):
-Partition-based multi-agent audit. Instead of 1 analyzer per tmux window, the codebase is split into partitions and each partition runs ALL analyzers.
-1. Scan the target directory to understand the codebase structure:
-   - Use Glob to find top-level source directories
-   - Group related directories into 3-7 logical partitions (coherent domains: auth, api, ui, etc.)
-   - If user provided PARTITIONS=N (a number), split into exactly N partitions
-   - If user provided PARTITIONS=dir1,dir2,dir3, use those exact directories
-2. Show the partition plan and agent count to the user, confirm before launching:
-   Example: "5 partitions x 5 analyzers = 25 agents. Estimated cost: $X. Proceed?"
-3. Spawn sessions with partitions:
-   ```bash
-   node .agileflow/scripts/spawn-audit-sessions.js --audit=architecture --target=TARGET --depth=extreme --partitions=dir1,dir2,dir3 --model=MODEL --json
-   ```
-4. Wait and collect results (same as ultradeep - use tmux-audit-monitor.js)
-5. Run consensus on combined results from all partitions
-
-**PARTITIONS argument** (only used with DEPTH=extreme):
-| Value | Behavior |
-|-------|----------|
-| Not set | AI decides partitions (3-7 based on codebase size) |
-| `PARTITIONS=5` | AI creates exactly 5 partitions |
-| `PARTITIONS=src/auth,src/api,lib` | Use these exact directories |
-
-### STEP 2: Deploy Analyzers in Parallel
-
-**CRITICAL**: Deploy ALL selected analyzers in a SINGLE message with multiple Task calls.
-
-**Prompt template for each analyzer**:
-
-```
-TASK: Analyze the following code for {ARCH_DOMAIN} issues.
-
-TARGET: {file_path or directory}
-DEPTH: {quick|deep}
-
-{For quick depth}: Focus on STRUCTURAL and DEGRADED severity issues only. Skip style improvements.
-{For deep depth}: Be comprehensive. Include SMELL and STYLE findings.
-
-Read the target files and apply your analysis methodology.
-
-OUTPUT your findings in your standard format (FINDING-N with location, severity, confidence, metric, code, explanation, remediation).
-
-If no issues found, output: "No {ARCH_DOMAIN} issues found in {TARGET}"
-```
-
-**Deploy all 5 analyzers** using these subagent types:
-- `arch-analyzer-coupling` - Fan-in/fan-out, module independence
-- `arch-analyzer-layering` - Layer violations, import direction
-- `arch-analyzer-complexity` - Cyclomatic/cognitive complexity, file size
-- `arch-analyzer-patterns` - God objects, feature envy, anti-patterns
-- `arch-analyzer-circular` - Circular deps, import cycles
-
-### STEP 3: Collect Results
-
-Wait for all analyzers to complete using TaskOutput with `block=true`.
-
-### STEP 4: Run Consensus Coordinator
-
-Pass all analyzer outputs to the consensus coordinator:
-
-```xml
-<invoke name="Task">
-<parameter name="description">Architecture audit consensus</parameter>
-<parameter name="prompt">You are the Architecture Consensus Coordinator.
-
-TARGET: {target_path}
-DEPTH: {depth}
-
-## Analyzer Outputs
-
-### Coupling Analyzer Results:
-{coupling_output}
-
-### Layering Analyzer Results:
-{layering_output}
-
-### Complexity Analyzer Results:
-{complexity_output}
-
-### Anti-Patterns Analyzer Results:
-{patterns_output}
-
-### Circular Dependencies Analyzer Results:
-{circular_output}
-
----
-
-Follow your consensus process:
-1. Detect architecture pattern (Clean, MVC, Feature-based, etc.)
-2. Parse all findings into normalized structure
-3. Group related findings by module/area
-4. Vote on confidence (CONFIRMED if 2+ agree, LIKELY if 1 with evidence)
-5. Filter by architecture pattern relevance
-6. Compute Architecture Health Score (0-100)
-7. Generate the final Architecture Audit Report
-8. Save report to docs/08-project/arch-audits/arch-audit-{YYYYMMDD}.md
-</parameter>
-<parameter name="subagent_type">arch-consensus</parameter>
-</invoke>
-```
-
-### STEP 5: Present Results
-
-After consensus completes, show the report summary and offer next steps:
-
-```xml
-<invoke name="AskUserQuestion">
-<parameter name="questions">[{
-  "question": "Architecture audit complete: Health Score [N]/100 ([rating]). [N] findings across [files_count] files. Pattern: [arch_type].",
-  "header": "Next steps",
-  "multiSelect": false,
-  "options": [
-    {"label": "Fix [structural] Structural issues now (Recommended)", "description": "[top_issue_summary]"},
-    {"label": "Create stories for all findings", "description": "Track [structural] structural + [degraded] degraded items in backlog"},
-    {"label": "Re-run with DEPTH=deep", "description": "Current was quick - deep includes SMELL and STYLE findings"},
-    {"label": "Save report and done", "description": "Report saved to docs/08-project/arch-audits/"}
-  ]
-}]</parameter>
-</invoke>
-```
-
----
-
-<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_START -->
-## Compact Summary
-
-**Command**: `/agileflow:code:architecture` - Multi-agent architecture health analysis with consensus
-
-**Quick Usage**:
-```
-/agileflow:code:architecture src/                         # Quick scan (all 5 analyzers)
-/agileflow:code:architecture . DEPTH=deep                 # Comprehensive analysis
-/agileflow:code:architecture lib/ FOCUS=coupling,circular  # Specific areas
-```
-
-**What It Does**: Deploy arch analyzers in parallel -> Each checks different structural aspects -> Consensus validates, computes health score -> Architecture Audit Report
-
-**Analyzers (all 5)**:
-- `arch-analyzer-coupling` - Fan-in/fan-out, tight coupling, shared state
-- `arch-analyzer-layering` - Layer violations, import direction, mixed concerns
-- `arch-analyzer-complexity` - Cyclomatic complexity, file size, nesting depth
-- `arch-analyzer-patterns` - God objects, feature envy, data clumps, repeated switches
-- `arch-analyzer-circular` - Import cycles, barrel file cycles, initialization order
-
-**Severity Levels**:
-- STRUCTURAL: Architecture actively impeding development
-- DEGRADED: Growing problems, increasing maintenance cost
-- SMELL: Early warning signs
-- STYLE: Convention/consistency issues
-
-**Output**: `docs/08-project/arch-audits/arch-audit-{YYYYMMDD}.md`
-<!-- COMPACT_SUMMARY_END -->
-
----
-
-## Boundary Rules (No Overlap)
-
-- **vs code:security**: No vulnerability analysis - that's security domain
-- **vs code:logic**: No logic bugs or edge cases - that's logic domain
-- **vs code:performance**: No runtime performance - that's performance domain
-- **Focus on structural health** - coupling, layering, complexity, patterns, cycles
-
----
-
-## Related Commands
-
-- `/agileflow:code:security` - Security vulnerability analysis
-- `/agileflow:code:logic` - Logic bug analysis
-- `/agileflow:code:performance` - Performance bottleneck analysis
-- `/agileflow:impact` - Change impact analysis
-- `/agileflow:deps` - Dependency graph visualization