agileflow 2.61.0 → 2.62.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +9 -9
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/scripts/lib/counter.js +103 -0
- package/src/core/commands/auto.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/babysit.md +170 -29
- package/src/core/commands/board.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ci.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/compress.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/deploy.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/help.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/research.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/create.md +566 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/delete.md +189 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/edit.md +245 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/list.md +155 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/test.md +249 -0
- package/src/core/commands/template.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/tests.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/update.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/velocity.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/experts/refactor/expertise.yaml +17 -12
- package/src/core/templates/claude-settings.advanced.example.json +1 -1
- package/src/core/templates/claude-settings.example.json +1 -1
- package/tools/cli/commands/list.js +8 -13
- package/tools/cli/installers/core/installer.js +20 -19
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/_base-ide.js +18 -4
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/claude-code.js +4 -15
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/codex.js +9 -13
- package/tools/cli/lib/content-injector.js +162 -31
- package/tools/cli/lib/utils.js +87 -0
- package/src/core/skills/acceptance-criteria-generator/SKILL.md +0 -46
- package/src/core/skills/adr-template/SKILL.md +0 -62
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-acceptance-criteria/SKILL.md +0 -156
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-adr/SKILL.md +0 -147
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-adr/examples/database-choice-example.md +0 -122
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-adr/templates/adr-template.md +0 -69
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/SKILL.md +0 -130
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/reference/bad-examples.md +0 -168
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/reference/good-examples.md +0 -120
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/scripts/check-attribution.sh +0 -15
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-epic-planner/SKILL.md +0 -184
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/SKILL.md +0 -119
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/cookbook/4ls.md +0 -86
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/cookbook/glad-sad-mad.md +0 -79
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/cookbook/start-stop-continue.md +0 -142
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/prompts/action-items.md +0 -83
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-sprint-planner/SKILL.md +0 -212
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-story-writer/SKILL.md +0 -163
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-story-writer/examples/good-story-example.md +0 -63
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-story-writer/templates/story-template.md +0 -44
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-tech-debt/SKILL.md +0 -215
- package/src/core/skills/api-documentation-generator/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/changelog-entry/SKILL.md +0 -55
- package/src/core/skills/commit-message-formatter/SKILL.md +0 -50
- package/src/core/skills/deployment-guide-generator/SKILL.md +0 -84
- package/src/core/skills/diagram-generator/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/error-handler-template/SKILL.md +0 -78
- package/src/core/skills/migration-checklist/SKILL.md +0 -82
- package/src/core/skills/pr-description/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/sql-schema-generator/SKILL.md +0 -69
- package/src/core/skills/story-skeleton/SKILL.md +0 -34
- package/src/core/skills/test-case-generator/SKILL.md +0 -63
- package/src/core/skills/type-definitions/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/validation-schema-generator/SKILL.md +0 -64
- package/src/core/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md +0 -352
- package/src/core/skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md +0 -232
|
@@ -1,215 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: agileflow-tech-debt
|
|
3
|
-
description: Identifies and tracks technical debt items with impact/effort matrix and prioritization. Loads when discussing code quality, refactoring, or long-term maintenance.
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# AgileFlow Tech Debt
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Identifies, documents, prioritizes, and tracks technical debt using impact/effort matrix and priority scoring to manage debt systematically.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
This skill activates when:
|
|
13
|
-
- Discussing code quality, refactoring, maintenance issues
|
|
14
|
-
- Keywords: "tech debt", "needs cleanup", "messy code", "technical debt"
|
|
15
|
-
- Team pain points from retrospectives
|
|
16
|
-
- Developer complaints about specific code areas
|
|
17
|
-
- During code reviews when debt is identified
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
1. Identifies technical debt from user descriptions
|
|
22
|
-
2. Classifies type (Code Quality, Performance, Security, Maintainability, Testing)
|
|
23
|
-
3. Assesses impact/urgency/effort (1-5 scale)
|
|
24
|
-
4. Calculates priority score: (Impact × Urgency) / Effort
|
|
25
|
-
5. Documents in docs/08-quality/tech-debt.md
|
|
26
|
-
6. Suggests actions (create story for high-priority items)
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
## Instructions
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
1. **Identify tech debt** from user description or code analysis:
|
|
31
|
-
- What specific code/system is problematic?
|
|
32
|
-
- Why is this debt (not just "messy" but concrete issues)?
|
|
33
|
-
- What pain does it cause?
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
2. **Classify type**:
|
|
36
|
-
- Code Quality | Performance | Security | Maintainability | Testing
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
3. **Assess dimensions** (1-5 scale):
|
|
39
|
-
- **Impact**: How much does this hurt us?
|
|
40
|
-
- **Urgency**: How soon must we fix?
|
|
41
|
-
- **Effort**: How hard to fix?
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
4. **Calculate priority score**: (Impact × Urgency) / Effort
|
|
44
|
-
- Score >10: High Priority (DO NOW)
|
|
45
|
-
- Score 3-10: Medium Priority (PLAN)
|
|
46
|
-
- Score <3: Low Priority (LATER)
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
5. **Document item** in docs/08-quality/tech-debt.md:
|
|
49
|
-
- ID: TD-### (next sequential number)
|
|
50
|
-
- Include: Problem, Impact, Proposed Solution, Effort, Priority Score, Status
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
6. **Suggest actions**:
|
|
53
|
-
- **High priority (>10)**: Create story via `/agileflow:story`
|
|
54
|
-
- **Major refactoring**: Document via `/agileflow:adr-new`
|
|
55
|
-
- **Blocking features**: Update status.json with blocked stories
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
## Tech Debt Item Template
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
```markdown
|
|
60
|
-
### [TD-###] Descriptive Title
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
**Impact**: 1-5 (Low/Medium/High)
|
|
63
|
-
**Urgency**: 1-5 (Low/Medium/High)
|
|
64
|
-
**Effort**: 1-5 (Low <1 sprint / Medium 1-2 sprints / High >2 sprints)
|
|
65
|
-
**Priority Score**: (Impact × Urgency) / Effort = X.X
|
|
66
|
-
**Type**: Code Quality | Performance | Security | Maintainability | Testing
|
|
67
|
-
**Status**: Identified | Planned | In Progress | Resolved
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
**Problem**:
|
|
70
|
-
[What's wrong? Be specific, not vague.]
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
**Impact**:
|
|
73
|
-
- [How does this hurt us? Specific pain points]
|
|
74
|
-
- [What can't we do because of this?]
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
**Proposed Solution**:
|
|
77
|
-
- [What should we do to address this?]
|
|
78
|
-
- [What tools/patterns to use?]
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
**Estimated Effort**: X story points
|
|
81
|
-
```
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
## Priority Score Formula
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
```
|
|
86
|
-
Priority = (Impact × Urgency) / Effort
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
Impact: 1 (Low), 3 (Medium), 5 (High)
|
|
89
|
-
Urgency: 1 (Low), 3 (Medium), 5 (High)
|
|
90
|
-
Effort: 1 (Low <1 sprint), 3 (Medium 1-2 sprints), 5 (High >2 sprints)
|
|
91
|
-
```
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
**Examples**:
|
|
94
|
-
- TD-042: (3 × 3) / 1 = 9 (High Priority - duplicate code, easy fix)
|
|
95
|
-
- TD-067: (5 × 5) / 1 = 25 (Critical Priority - slow query, add index)
|
|
96
|
-
- TD-089: (1 × 1) / 5 = 0.2 (Low Priority - minor cleanup, major refactor)
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
## Impact/Effort Matrix
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
```
|
|
101
|
-
High Impact, │ DO NOW │ DO NOW │ │
|
|
102
|
-
Low Effort │ │ │ │
|
|
103
|
-
├────────┼────────┼────────┤
|
|
104
|
-
High Impact, │ PLAN │ PLAN │ │
|
|
105
|
-
Med Effort │ │ │ │
|
|
106
|
-
├────────┼────────┼────────┤
|
|
107
|
-
Low Impact, │ LATER │ LATER │ NEVER │
|
|
108
|
-
Any Effort │ │ │ │
|
|
109
|
-
└────────┴────────┴────────┘
|
|
110
|
-
Low Medium High
|
|
111
|
-
EFFORT
|
|
112
|
-
```
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
## Types of Tech Debt
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
**Code Quality**: Duplicate code, complex logic, poor naming, missing docs
|
|
117
|
-
- Example: User validation copy-pasted in 8 files
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
**Performance**: Slow queries, N+1 problems, inefficient algorithms, missing caching
|
|
120
|
-
- Example: Login query takes 500ms due to missing index
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
**Security**: Outdated dependencies, vulnerable packages, missing auth, insufficient validation
|
|
123
|
-
- Example: Package X has known CVE, needs update
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
**Maintainability**: Tightly coupled code, missing tests, unclear architecture
|
|
126
|
-
- Example: Module X has 0 tests, 300 LOC
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
**Testing**: Low coverage, flaky tests, slow suite, missing integration tests
|
|
129
|
-
- Example: Test coverage at 45%, target is 80%
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
## When to Address Tech Debt
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
**Continuous** (Every Sprint):
|
|
134
|
-
- Allocate 10-20% of sprint capacity for debt reduction
|
|
135
|
-
- Boy Scout Rule: Leave code cleaner than you found it
|
|
136
|
-
|
|
137
|
-
**Scheduled** (Quarterly):
|
|
138
|
-
- Tech debt sprint (full sprint dedicated to quality)
|
|
139
|
-
- Major refactoring initiatives
|
|
140
|
-
|
|
141
|
-
**Opportunistic**:
|
|
142
|
-
- While working on nearby code
|
|
143
|
-
- When adding related features
|
|
144
|
-
- During bug fixes in affected areas
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
**Strategic**:
|
|
147
|
-
- Before major new features (clean foundation)
|
|
148
|
-
- When debt blocks progress (unblock development)
|
|
149
|
-
- When quality metrics decline
|
|
150
|
-
|
|
151
|
-
## Tech Debt Metrics
|
|
152
|
-
|
|
153
|
-
Track in docs/08-quality/tech-debt.md:
|
|
154
|
-
|
|
155
|
-
```markdown
|
|
156
|
-
## Tech Debt Health (Q4 2025)
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
**Total Items**: 24 (🔴 6 High, 🟡 11 Medium, 🟢 7 Low)
|
|
159
|
-
**Total Estimated Effort**: 156 story points
|
|
160
|
-
**Resolved This Quarter**: 8 items (42 story points)
|
|
161
|
-
**New This Quarter**: 5 items (18 story points)
|
|
162
|
-
**Net Change**: -3 items (-24 points) ✅ Improving
|
|
163
|
-
```
|
|
164
|
-
|
|
165
|
-
## Quality Checklist
|
|
166
|
-
|
|
167
|
-
Before creating tech debt item:
|
|
168
|
-
- [ ] Problem clearly described (specific code/system, not vague)
|
|
169
|
-
- [ ] Impact explained with concrete pain points
|
|
170
|
-
- [ ] Proposed solution is specific and actionable
|
|
171
|
-
- [ ] Effort estimated realistically
|
|
172
|
-
- [ ] Priority score calculated: (Impact × Urgency) / Effort
|
|
173
|
-
- [ ] Type assigned correctly
|
|
174
|
-
- [ ] Owner or responsible team identified
|
|
175
|
-
- [ ] Status set appropriately
|
|
176
|
-
- [ ] TD-### ID is next sequential number
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
178
|
-
## Priority Tiers
|
|
179
|
-
|
|
180
|
-
- **🔴 High Priority (score >10)**: DO NOW - High impact, low-medium effort
|
|
181
|
-
- **🟡 Medium Priority (score 3-10)**: PLAN - Mixed impact/effort
|
|
182
|
-
- **🟢 Low Priority (score <3)**: LATER - Low impact or high effort
|
|
183
|
-
|
|
184
|
-
## Integration
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
- **agileflow-story**: Convert high-priority debt (>10) to stories
|
|
187
|
-
- **agileflow-adr**: Document major refactoring decisions
|
|
188
|
-
- **agileflow-retro**: Retrospectives surface new tech debt
|
|
189
|
-
- **agileflow-sprint**: Allocate 10-20% sprint capacity for debt reduction
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
## Preventing Tech Debt
|
|
192
|
-
|
|
193
|
-
**Best Practices**:
|
|
194
|
-
- Code reviews catch issues early
|
|
195
|
-
- Automated testing prevents regressions (80%+ coverage)
|
|
196
|
-
- Regular refactoring (Boy Scout Rule)
|
|
197
|
-
- Document intentional decisions (ADRs)
|
|
198
|
-
- Allocate time for quality work
|
|
199
|
-
|
|
200
|
-
**Warning Signs**:
|
|
201
|
-
- Slowing velocity (stories taking longer)
|
|
202
|
-
- Increasing bug rate
|
|
203
|
-
- Developers avoiding certain code
|
|
204
|
-
- Long PR review times
|
|
205
|
-
- New developer onboarding difficulty
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
## Notes
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
- Track tech debt, don't let it hide (visibility is key)
|
|
210
|
-
- Make it visible (metrics, reviews)
|
|
211
|
-
- Allocate consistent capacity (10-20% per sprint)
|
|
212
|
-
- Celebrate debt reduction
|
|
213
|
-
- Prevent new debt through code review
|
|
214
|
-
- Balance new features with quality
|
|
215
|
-
- Not all "ugly code" is debt - document intentional trade-offs as ADRs
|
|
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: api-documentation-generator
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate OpenAPI/Swagger documentation with request/response schemas
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# api-documentation-generator
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate OpenAPI/Swagger snippets with proper schemas.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "API doc", "OpenAPI", "Swagger", "endpoint docs", "endpoint documentation"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- Documenting REST API endpoints
|
|
15
|
-
- Creating OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
|
|
16
|
-
- Need endpoint documentation with request/response examples
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
Generates OpenAPI 3.0 specification snippets including:
|
|
20
|
-
- **Endpoint path and method** (GET, POST, etc.)
|
|
21
|
-
- **Summary and description**
|
|
22
|
-
- **Request body** with schema and examples
|
|
23
|
-
- **Response schemas** (success and error cases)
|
|
24
|
-
- **Parameters** (query, path, header)
|
|
25
|
-
- **Authentication** requirements
|
|
26
|
-
- **Status codes** and descriptions
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
Coordinates with documentation agent for full API docs.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Output
|
|
31
|
-
OpenAPI YAML/JSON snippet ready for integration into spec
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
34
|
-
User: "Document POST /api/auth/login endpoint"
|
|
35
|
-
Skill: Generates:
|
|
36
|
-
```yaml
|
|
37
|
-
/api/auth/login:
|
|
38
|
-
post:
|
|
39
|
-
summary: User login with email and password
|
|
40
|
-
tags: [Authentication]
|
|
41
|
-
requestBody:
|
|
42
|
-
required: true
|
|
43
|
-
content:
|
|
44
|
-
application/json:
|
|
45
|
-
schema:
|
|
46
|
-
type: object
|
|
47
|
-
properties:
|
|
48
|
-
email:
|
|
49
|
-
type: string
|
|
50
|
-
format: email
|
|
51
|
-
password:
|
|
52
|
-
type: string
|
|
53
|
-
responses:
|
|
54
|
-
'200':
|
|
55
|
-
description: Login successful
|
|
56
|
-
content:
|
|
57
|
-
application/json:
|
|
58
|
-
schema:
|
|
59
|
-
type: object
|
|
60
|
-
properties:
|
|
61
|
-
token:
|
|
62
|
-
type: string
|
|
63
|
-
'401':
|
|
64
|
-
description: Invalid credentials
|
|
65
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: changelog-entry
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate Keep a Changelog format entries for version releases
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# changelog-entry
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate Keep a Changelog format entries.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "changelog", "release notes", "version notes", "changelog entry"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- Creating release notes for new version
|
|
15
|
-
- Documenting changes for changelog
|
|
16
|
-
- Preparing version announcement
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
Generates changelog entries in Keep a Changelog format:
|
|
20
|
-
- **Version header** with date (YYYY-MM-DD)
|
|
21
|
-
- **Categories**: Added, Changed, Fixed, Improved, Deprecated, Removed, Security
|
|
22
|
-
- **Detailed descriptions** of each change
|
|
23
|
-
- **Breaking changes** clearly marked
|
|
24
|
-
- **Links to related issues/PRs**
|
|
25
|
-
- **Migration guides** for breaking changes
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
Can auto-extract changes from commit messages if provided.
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Output
|
|
30
|
-
Ready-to-add section for CHANGELOG.md
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
33
|
-
User: "Version 2.18.0 - Added 8 new agents"
|
|
34
|
-
Skill: Generates:
|
|
35
|
-
```markdown
|
|
36
|
-
## [2.18.0] - 2025-10-28
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
### Added
|
|
39
|
-
- **Documentation Agent** - Technical docs, API documentation, user guides
|
|
40
|
-
- **Monitoring Agent** - Observability, logging, metrics, alerting
|
|
41
|
-
- **Compliance Agent** - GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2 compliance
|
|
42
|
-
- **Design Agent** - Design systems, component specs
|
|
43
|
-
- **Accessibility Agent** - WCAG compliance, a11y testing
|
|
44
|
-
- **Analytics Agent** - Event tracking, product analytics
|
|
45
|
-
- **Data Migration Agent** - Zero-downtime migrations
|
|
46
|
-
- **QA Agent** - Test strategy, release gates
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
### Changed
|
|
49
|
-
- Expanded agent ecosystem from 17 to 25 agents
|
|
50
|
-
- Improved agent coverage for enterprise features
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
### Improved
|
|
53
|
-
- Added comprehensive monitoring and compliance support
|
|
54
|
-
- Enhanced quality assurance gates
|
|
55
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: commit-message-formatter
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate conventional commit messages following Conventional Commits standard
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# commit-message-formatter
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate conventional commit messages with detailed descriptions.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "commit", "git commit", "conventional commit", "commit message"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- User is about to commit code changes
|
|
15
|
-
- Need to format commit in conventional commits style
|
|
16
|
-
- Writing clear, searchable commit messages
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
Generates properly-formatted commit messages following Conventional Commits standard:
|
|
20
|
-
- Type: feat, fix, chore, docs, style, refactor, perf, test
|
|
21
|
-
- Scope: module or component affected
|
|
22
|
-
- Subject: concise description (imperative mood, <50 chars)
|
|
23
|
-
- Body: detailed explanation of change (wrapped at 72 chars)
|
|
24
|
-
- Footer: references to issues, breaking changes, co-authorship
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
Automatically includes:
|
|
27
|
-
- Claude Code co-authorship footer
|
|
28
|
-
- Link to related story/issue if mentioned
|
|
29
|
-
- Breaking change notation if applicable
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Output
|
|
32
|
-
Ready-to-use commit message for `git commit -m`
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
35
|
-
User: "I implemented user login endpoint with JWT auth and rate limiting"
|
|
36
|
-
Skill: Generates:
|
|
37
|
-
```
|
|
38
|
-
feat(auth): implement JWT-based user login endpoint
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
Implemented POST /api/auth/login endpoint with:
|
|
41
|
-
- Email/password validation
|
|
42
|
-
- JWT token generation (24h expiration)
|
|
43
|
-
- Rate limiting (5 attempts per 15 minutes)
|
|
44
|
-
- Proper error handling and logging
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
Matches acceptance criteria from US-0001.
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
|
|
49
|
-
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
50
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: deployment-guide-generator
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate deployment guides with rollback procedures and verification steps
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# deployment-guide-generator
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate deployment guides with rollback procedures.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "deployment", "release guide", "deploy steps", "deployment procedure"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- Preparing to deploy a feature
|
|
15
|
-
- Creating release runbook
|
|
16
|
-
- Documenting deployment steps
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
Generates deployment guide including:
|
|
20
|
-
- **Pre-deployment checklist** (tests passing, staging verified)
|
|
21
|
-
- **Deployment steps** (database migrations, code deployment)
|
|
22
|
-
- **Verification steps** (health checks, smoke tests)
|
|
23
|
-
- **Rollback procedure** (how to revert if issues)
|
|
24
|
-
- **Post-deployment monitoring** (watch metrics/logs)
|
|
25
|
-
- **Communication plan** (who to notify)
|
|
26
|
-
- **Estimated timeline**
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
References monitoring for setup and rollback procedures.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Output
|
|
31
|
-
Ready-to-follow deployment guide
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
34
|
-
User: "Create deployment guide for user login feature"
|
|
35
|
-
Skill: Generates:
|
|
36
|
-
```markdown
|
|
37
|
-
## Deployment Guide: User Login Feature (v2.18.0)
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
### Pre-Deployment Checklist
|
|
40
|
-
- [ ] All tests passing (npm test)
|
|
41
|
-
- [ ] Staging environment verified
|
|
42
|
-
- [ ] Database backup taken
|
|
43
|
-
- [ ] Monitoring alerts configured
|
|
44
|
-
- [ ] Team notified
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
### Deployment Steps
|
|
47
|
-
1. Run database migrations
|
|
48
|
-
\`\`\`bash
|
|
49
|
-
npm run migrate:up
|
|
50
|
-
\`\`\`
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
2. Deploy new code
|
|
53
|
-
\`\`\`bash
|
|
54
|
-
git push production main
|
|
55
|
-
\`\`\`
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
3. Verify deployment
|
|
58
|
-
- Check /health endpoint returns 200
|
|
59
|
-
- Verify JWT tokens working
|
|
60
|
-
- Check rate limiting active
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
### Monitoring (Watch these metrics)
|
|
63
|
-
- Login success rate (target: >95%)
|
|
64
|
-
- Login latency (target: <200ms p95)
|
|
65
|
-
- Error rate (alert if >1%)
|
|
66
|
-
- Rate limiting hits (expected: <5%)
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
### Rollback Procedure (if issues)
|
|
69
|
-
1. Revert database migrations:
|
|
70
|
-
\`\`\`bash
|
|
71
|
-
npm run migrate:down
|
|
72
|
-
\`\`\`
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
2. Revert code:
|
|
75
|
-
\`\`\`bash
|
|
76
|
-
git revert <commit-hash>
|
|
77
|
-
git push production main
|
|
78
|
-
\`\`\`
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
3. Verify rollback successful
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
**Estimated Timeline**: 15 minutes (10 min deploy + 5 min verify)
|
|
83
|
-
**Rollback Time**: 10 minutes
|
|
84
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: diagram-generator
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate Mermaid/ASCII diagrams for workflows, architecture, and sequence diagrams
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# diagram-generator
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate Mermaid/ASCII diagrams from descriptions.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "diagram", "ASCII", "Mermaid", "flowchart", "architecture", "sequence diagram"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- Creating architecture diagrams
|
|
15
|
-
- Visualizing user workflows
|
|
16
|
-
- Drawing sequence diagrams
|
|
17
|
-
- System design documentation
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
20
|
-
Generates diagrams in Mermaid format (renders in GitHub/Markdown):
|
|
21
|
-
- **Flowcharts** (user flows, decision trees)
|
|
22
|
-
- **Sequence diagrams** (API interactions, service calls)
|
|
23
|
-
- **Architecture diagrams** (system components, data flow)
|
|
24
|
-
- **ER diagrams** (database relationships)
|
|
25
|
-
- **Gantt charts** (timeline/roadmap)
|
|
26
|
-
- **State diagrams** (state machines)
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
Also supports ASCII art for simple diagrams.
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Output
|
|
31
|
-
Mermaid code blocks ready for markdown files
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
34
|
-
User: "Draw user login flow"
|
|
35
|
-
Skill: Generates:
|
|
36
|
-
```mermaid
|
|
37
|
-
flowchart TD
|
|
38
|
-
A[User opens login page] --> B[Enter email & password]
|
|
39
|
-
B --> C[Click submit]
|
|
40
|
-
C --> D{Valid credentials?}
|
|
41
|
-
D -->|No| E[Show error message]
|
|
42
|
-
E --> B
|
|
43
|
-
D -->|Yes| F[Generate JWT token]
|
|
44
|
-
F --> G[Redirect to dashboard]
|
|
45
|
-
G --> H[User logged in]
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
style D fill:#ff9999
|
|
48
|
-
style H fill:#99ff99
|
|
49
|
-
```
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
Architecture diagram example:
|
|
52
|
-
```mermaid
|
|
53
|
-
graph LR
|
|
54
|
-
Client[Frontend Client]
|
|
55
|
-
API[API Server]
|
|
56
|
-
DB[(Database)]
|
|
57
|
-
Cache[Redis Cache]
|
|
58
|
-
Auth[Auth Service]
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
Client -->|HTTP Request| API
|
|
61
|
-
API -->|Query| DB
|
|
62
|
-
API -->|Lookup| Cache
|
|
63
|
-
API -->|Verify Token| Auth
|
|
64
|
-
Auth -->|Check User| DB
|
|
65
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: error-handler-template
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate error handling boilerplate with custom error classes and try/catch patterns
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# error-handler-template
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate error handling boilerplate for different languages.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "error handling", "try catch", "error handler", "exception handling"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- Implementing error handling for new features
|
|
15
|
-
- Standardizing error responses across API
|
|
16
|
-
- Creating error logging patterns
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
Generates language-specific error handling code including:
|
|
20
|
-
- **Error classes** with custom fields
|
|
21
|
-
- **Try/catch patterns** for common scenarios
|
|
22
|
-
- **Error middleware** for API servers
|
|
23
|
-
- **Logging integration** for errors
|
|
24
|
-
- **User-friendly error messages**
|
|
25
|
-
- **HTTP status code mapping**
|
|
26
|
-
- **Stack trace and context capture**
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
Supports: JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, Rust
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Output
|
|
31
|
-
Error handling code ready to integrate
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
34
|
-
User: "Create error handling for login endpoint"
|
|
35
|
-
Skill: Generates (TypeScript):
|
|
36
|
-
```typescript
|
|
37
|
-
// Custom error class
|
|
38
|
-
class AuthError extends Error {
|
|
39
|
-
constructor(
|
|
40
|
-
public code: string,
|
|
41
|
-
public statusCode: number,
|
|
42
|
-
message: string,
|
|
43
|
-
public context?: Record<string, any>
|
|
44
|
-
) {
|
|
45
|
-
super(message);
|
|
46
|
-
}
|
|
47
|
-
}
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
// Try/catch pattern
|
|
50
|
-
async function login(email: string, password: string) {
|
|
51
|
-
try {
|
|
52
|
-
const user = await findUserByEmail(email);
|
|
53
|
-
if (!user) {
|
|
54
|
-
throw new AuthError('USER_NOT_FOUND', 404, 'User not found', { email });
|
|
55
|
-
}
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
const isValid = await verifyPassword(password, user.passwordHash);
|
|
58
|
-
if (!isValid) {
|
|
59
|
-
logger.warn('Invalid password attempt', { email });
|
|
60
|
-
throw new AuthError(
|
|
61
|
-
'INVALID_CREDENTIALS',
|
|
62
|
-
401,
|
|
63
|
-
'Invalid email or password'
|
|
64
|
-
);
|
|
65
|
-
}
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
return generateToken(user);
|
|
68
|
-
} catch (error) {
|
|
69
|
-
if (error instanceof AuthError) {
|
|
70
|
-
logger.error(error.message, { code: error.code, context: error.context });
|
|
71
|
-
throw error;
|
|
72
|
-
}
|
|
73
|
-
// Handle unexpected errors
|
|
74
|
-
logger.error('Unexpected error in login', { error });
|
|
75
|
-
throw new AuthError('INTERNAL_ERROR', 500, 'Internal server error');
|
|
76
|
-
}
|
|
77
|
-
}
|
|
78
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: migration-checklist
|
|
3
|
-
description: Generate data migration checklist with validation, rollback, and zero-downtime procedures
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# migration-checklist
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Generate data migration checklist.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## Activation Keywords
|
|
11
|
-
- "migration", "zero-downtime", "data migration", "migration checklist"
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
14
|
-
- Planning data migrations (schema changes, zero-downtime)
|
|
15
|
-
- Moving data between systems
|
|
16
|
-
- Large-scale data transformations
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
Generates comprehensive migration checklist including:
|
|
20
|
-
- **Pre-migration validation** (backup, verify counts)
|
|
21
|
-
- **Migration phases** (dual-write, backfill, switch)
|
|
22
|
-
- **Rollback procedures** (tested and documented)
|
|
23
|
-
- **Data validation rules** (checksums, counts, integrity)
|
|
24
|
-
- **Monitoring during migration** (watch for anomalies)
|
|
25
|
-
- **Post-migration verification** (smoke tests, queries)
|
|
26
|
-
- **Cleanup procedures** (remove old schema/data)
|
|
27
|
-
- **Communication timeline**
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
Coordinates with datamigration agent for detailed migration planning.
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Output
|
|
32
|
-
Ready-to-execute migration checklist
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## Example Activation
|
|
35
|
-
User: "Plan zero-downtime migration from sessions to JWT"
|
|
36
|
-
Skill: Generates:
|
|
37
|
-
```markdown
|
|
38
|
-
## Migration Checklist: Session → JWT Migration
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
### Phase 1: Preparation (pre-migration)
|
|
41
|
-
- [ ] Create full database backup (test restore)
|
|
42
|
-
- [ ] Verify staging matches production (data volume, schema)
|
|
43
|
-
- [ ] Prepare rollback procedure (documented and tested)
|
|
44
|
-
- [ ] Brief team on timeline and communication
|
|
45
|
-
- [ ] Schedule 2-hour maintenance window
|
|
46
|
-
- [ ] Set up monitoring dashboards
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
### Phase 2: Dual-Write (no downtime)
|
|
49
|
-
- [ ] Deploy code that writes to BOTH sessions + JWT
|
|
50
|
-
- [ ] Monitor for errors (should be zero)
|
|
51
|
-
- [ ] Backfill JWT for existing sessions (background job)
|
|
52
|
-
- [ ] Track conversion progress (% of sessions migrated)
|
|
53
|
-
- [ ] Once 100% converted: Wait 24h for safety
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
### Phase 3: Verify
|
|
56
|
-
- [ ] Check record counts match:
|
|
57
|
-
- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sessions
|
|
58
|
-
- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM jwt_tokens
|
|
59
|
-
- Should be equal
|
|
60
|
-
- [ ] Validate JWT expiration timestamps
|
|
61
|
-
- [ ] Check no orphaned sessions
|
|
62
|
-
- [ ] Spot-check 100 random sessions
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
### Phase 4: Switch Reads
|
|
65
|
-
- [ ] Deploy code to read from JWT instead of sessions
|
|
66
|
-
- [ ] Monitor error rate (should be zero)
|
|
67
|
-
- [ ] Keep writing to BOTH for 24h (safety)
|
|
68
|
-
- [ ] Verify user experience
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
### Phase 5: Cleanup
|
|
71
|
-
- [ ] Stop writing to sessions table
|
|
72
|
-
- [ ] Archive sessions (backup)
|
|
73
|
-
- [ ] Drop sessions table
|
|
74
|
-
- [ ] Update documentation
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
### Rollback Point
|
|
77
|
-
If issues during Phase 1-2: Revert to code writing sessions only (backward compatible)
|
|
78
|
-
If issues during Phase 3-4: Switch reads back to sessions (keep JWT as backup)
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
**Estimated Timeline**: 3-4 hours total
|
|
81
|
-
**Expected Downtime**: 0 (zero-downtime migration)
|
|
82
|
-
```
|