agileflow 2.61.0 → 2.62.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +9 -9
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/scripts/lib/counter.js +103 -0
- package/src/core/commands/auto.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/babysit.md +170 -29
- package/src/core/commands/board.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/ci.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/compress.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/deploy.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/help.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/research.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/create.md +566 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/delete.md +189 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/edit.md +245 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/list.md +155 -0
- package/src/core/commands/skill/test.md +249 -0
- package/src/core/commands/template.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/tests.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/update.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/commands/velocity.md +1 -0
- package/src/core/experts/refactor/expertise.yaml +17 -12
- package/src/core/templates/claude-settings.advanced.example.json +1 -1
- package/src/core/templates/claude-settings.example.json +1 -1
- package/tools/cli/commands/list.js +8 -13
- package/tools/cli/installers/core/installer.js +20 -19
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/_base-ide.js +18 -4
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/claude-code.js +4 -15
- package/tools/cli/installers/ide/codex.js +9 -13
- package/tools/cli/lib/content-injector.js +162 -31
- package/tools/cli/lib/utils.js +87 -0
- package/src/core/skills/acceptance-criteria-generator/SKILL.md +0 -46
- package/src/core/skills/adr-template/SKILL.md +0 -62
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-acceptance-criteria/SKILL.md +0 -156
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-adr/SKILL.md +0 -147
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-adr/examples/database-choice-example.md +0 -122
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-adr/templates/adr-template.md +0 -69
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/SKILL.md +0 -130
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/reference/bad-examples.md +0 -168
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/reference/good-examples.md +0 -120
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-commit-messages/scripts/check-attribution.sh +0 -15
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-epic-planner/SKILL.md +0 -184
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/SKILL.md +0 -119
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/cookbook/4ls.md +0 -86
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/cookbook/glad-sad-mad.md +0 -79
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/cookbook/start-stop-continue.md +0 -142
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-retro-facilitator/prompts/action-items.md +0 -83
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-sprint-planner/SKILL.md +0 -212
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-story-writer/SKILL.md +0 -163
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-story-writer/examples/good-story-example.md +0 -63
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-story-writer/templates/story-template.md +0 -44
- package/src/core/skills/agileflow-tech-debt/SKILL.md +0 -215
- package/src/core/skills/api-documentation-generator/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/changelog-entry/SKILL.md +0 -55
- package/src/core/skills/commit-message-formatter/SKILL.md +0 -50
- package/src/core/skills/deployment-guide-generator/SKILL.md +0 -84
- package/src/core/skills/diagram-generator/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/error-handler-template/SKILL.md +0 -78
- package/src/core/skills/migration-checklist/SKILL.md +0 -82
- package/src/core/skills/pr-description/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/sql-schema-generator/SKILL.md +0 -69
- package/src/core/skills/story-skeleton/SKILL.md +0 -34
- package/src/core/skills/test-case-generator/SKILL.md +0 -63
- package/src/core/skills/type-definitions/SKILL.md +0 -65
- package/src/core/skills/validation-schema-generator/SKILL.md +0 -64
- package/src/core/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md +0 -352
- package/src/core/skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md +0 -232
|
@@ -1,120 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Good Commit Message Examples
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## Simple Feature Addition
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
```
|
|
6
|
-
feat(auth): add password reset via email
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Users can now request a password reset link sent to their
|
|
9
|
-
registered email address. The link expires after 1 hour.
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
Closes #456
|
|
12
|
-
```
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
## Bug Fix with Context
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
```
|
|
17
|
-
fix(cart): prevent duplicate items in shopping cart
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
Fixed race condition where clicking "Add to Cart" rapidly
|
|
20
|
-
could add the same item multiple times. Added debouncing
|
|
21
|
-
and server-side validation.
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
Fixes #789
|
|
24
|
-
```
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Refactoring with Explanation
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
```
|
|
29
|
-
refactor(api): extract authentication middleware
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
Moved authentication logic from individual route handlers
|
|
32
|
-
into reusable middleware. This reduces code duplication
|
|
33
|
-
and makes auth logic easier to maintain and test.
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
No behavioral changes.
|
|
36
|
-
```
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## Breaking Change
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
```
|
|
41
|
-
feat(api)!: migrate to v2 response format
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
BREAKING CHANGE: All API endpoints now return data wrapped
|
|
44
|
-
in a standardized envelope format.
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
Before: { id: 1, name: "..." }
|
|
47
|
-
After: { data: { id: 1, name: "..." }, meta: { version: 2 } }
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
Migration guide: docs/api-v2-migration.md
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
Closes #234
|
|
52
|
-
```
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
## Multiple Related Changes
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
```
|
|
57
|
-
feat(profile): add profile editing and avatar upload
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
- Implemented profile form with field validation
|
|
60
|
-
- Added avatar upload with client-side image cropping
|
|
61
|
-
- Created PUT /api/users/:id endpoint
|
|
62
|
-
- Added error handling for file size limits
|
|
63
|
-
- Wrote unit tests for profile update logic
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
Closes #123, #124
|
|
66
|
-
```
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
## Documentation
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
```
|
|
71
|
-
docs(readme): add installation instructions for Docker
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
Added step-by-step guide for running the application
|
|
74
|
-
in Docker containers, including environment variable
|
|
75
|
-
configuration and volume mounting.
|
|
76
|
-
```
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
## Performance Improvement
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
```
|
|
81
|
-
perf(db): add index on user email column
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
Query performance for user lookup by email improved from
|
|
84
|
-
~500ms to ~5ms. Added composite index on (email, status)
|
|
85
|
-
for common query patterns.
|
|
86
|
-
```
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
## Dependency Update
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
```
|
|
91
|
-
chore(deps): upgrade React to v18.2
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
Updated React and React DOM to latest stable version.
|
|
94
|
-
Migrated deprecated lifecycle methods in UserProfile
|
|
95
|
-
and Dashboard components.
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
Tested with full E2E suite - all tests passing.
|
|
98
|
-
```
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
## CI/CD Change
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
```
|
|
103
|
-
ci(github): add automated dependency updates
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
Configured Dependabot to create PRs for npm package
|
|
106
|
-
updates weekly. Auto-merge enabled for patch updates
|
|
107
|
-
that pass all tests.
|
|
108
|
-
```
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
## Revert
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
```
|
|
113
|
-
revert: feat(payments): add Stripe integration
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
This reverts commit abc123def456.
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
Stripe webhook validation is failing in production.
|
|
118
|
-
Reverting to investigate HMAC signature verification
|
|
119
|
-
before re-deploying.
|
|
120
|
-
```
|
|
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
#!/bin/bash
|
|
2
|
-
# check-attribution.sh
|
|
3
|
-
# Determines if Claude Code attribution should be added to git commits
|
|
4
|
-
# Returns "yes" if attribution should be added, "no" if it should not
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
if [ -f CLAUDE.md ]; then
|
|
7
|
-
if grep -q "DO NOT ADD AI ATTRIBUTION" CLAUDE.md; then
|
|
8
|
-
echo "no"
|
|
9
|
-
else
|
|
10
|
-
echo "yes"
|
|
11
|
-
fi
|
|
12
|
-
else
|
|
13
|
-
# Default to adding attribution if no CLAUDE.md exists
|
|
14
|
-
echo "yes"
|
|
15
|
-
fi
|
|
@@ -1,184 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: epic-planner
|
|
3
|
-
description: Breaks down large features into properly-scoped epics with milestones and story groupings. Loads when user describes major features or initiatives.
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# AgileFlow Epic Planner
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Automatically structures large features or initiatives into epics, breaking them down into logical story groupings and milestones.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
This skill activates when:
|
|
13
|
-
- User describes a large feature spanning multiple sprints
|
|
14
|
-
- Discussing a major initiative or project
|
|
15
|
-
- Keywords: "epic", "initiative", "theme", "big feature", "multi-month project"
|
|
16
|
-
- Feature seems too large to be a single story (>13 story points)
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
1. Detects large feature descriptions
|
|
21
|
-
2. Asks clarifying questions (problem, timeline, success metrics)
|
|
22
|
-
3. Breaks down into logical milestones (MVP, Phase 2, Polish)
|
|
23
|
-
4. Estimates effort and suggests timeline
|
|
24
|
-
5. Creates epic file in docs/05-epics/
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Instructions
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
1. **Ask clarifying questions**:
|
|
29
|
-
- "What's the main problem you're solving?"
|
|
30
|
-
- "Who are the users?"
|
|
31
|
-
- "What's the timeline/urgency?"
|
|
32
|
-
- "What defines success?"
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
2. **Break down into logical chunks**:
|
|
35
|
-
- Identify milestones (MVP, Phase 2, Polish)
|
|
36
|
-
- Group related functionality
|
|
37
|
-
- Ensure each milestone delivers value
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
3. **Create epic structure**:
|
|
40
|
-
- Read existing epics for numbering
|
|
41
|
-
- Write epic file in `docs/05-epics/`
|
|
42
|
-
- Outline stories (create skeleton, defer details)
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
4. **Estimate effort**:
|
|
45
|
-
- Rough story point estimates
|
|
46
|
-
- Calculate milestone totals
|
|
47
|
-
- Suggest timeline based on team velocity
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
## Epic Format
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
```markdown
|
|
52
|
-
# [EPIC-###] Title
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
**Status**: PLANNING | ACTIVE | ON_HOLD | COMPLETED
|
|
55
|
-
**Owner**: Product Owner / Team Lead
|
|
56
|
-
**Start Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
57
|
-
**Target Completion**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
58
|
-
**Priority**: P0 | P1 | P2 | P3
|
|
59
|
-
**Business Value**: High | Medium | Low
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
## Problem Statement
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
[What problem does this epic solve? Why is it important?]
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
## Goals and Objectives
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
- [Goal 1: Specific, measurable outcome]
|
|
68
|
-
- [Goal 2: Business or user metric to improve]
|
|
69
|
-
- [Goal 3: Strategic alignment]
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
## Success Metrics
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
- [Metric 1: e.g., 20% increase in user engagement]
|
|
74
|
-
- [Metric 2: e.g., Reduce support tickets by 30%]
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
## User Stories
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
### Milestone 1: [Name] (Target: YYYY-MM-DD)
|
|
79
|
-
- [ ] [STORY-###: Title](../06-stories/STORY-###-title.md) - 5 pts
|
|
80
|
-
- [ ] [STORY-###: Title](../06-stories/STORY-###-title.md) - 8 pts
|
|
81
|
-
**Total: 16 story points**
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
### Milestone 2: [Name] (Target: YYYY-MM-DD)
|
|
84
|
-
- [ ] [STORY-###: Title](../06-stories/STORY-###-title.md) - 5 pts
|
|
85
|
-
- [ ] [STORY-###: Title](../06-stories/STORY-###-title.md) - 8 pts
|
|
86
|
-
**Total: 13 story points**
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
## Dependencies
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
- [Dependency 1: What needs to be done first]
|
|
91
|
-
- [Dependency 2: External team dependencies]
|
|
92
|
-
- [Dependency 3: Technical prerequisites]
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
## Risks and Assumptions
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
**Risks**:
|
|
97
|
-
- [Risk 1: What could go wrong]
|
|
98
|
-
- [Risk 2: Mitigation plan]
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
**Assumptions**:
|
|
101
|
-
- [Assumption 1: What we're assuming is true]
|
|
102
|
-
- [Assumption 2: Needs validation]
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
## Out of Scope
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
- [What we're explicitly NOT doing in this epic]
|
|
107
|
-
- [Features deferred to future epics]
|
|
108
|
-
|
|
109
|
-
## Progress Tracking
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
111
|
-
**Overall Progress**: X / Y stories completed (Z%)
|
|
112
|
-
**Last Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
113
|
-
```
|
|
114
|
-
|
|
115
|
-
## Epic vs Story
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
**This Should Be an Epic If**:
|
|
118
|
-
- Takes more than 1-2 sprints (>13 story points total)
|
|
119
|
-
- Involves multiple team members or subteams
|
|
120
|
-
- Has distinct phases or milestones
|
|
121
|
-
- Requires coordination across different areas (UI, API, DevOps)
|
|
122
|
-
- Has significant business impact or strategic value
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
**This Should Be a Story If**:
|
|
125
|
-
- Can be completed in one sprint
|
|
126
|
-
- Single developer can own it
|
|
127
|
-
- Clear, specific acceptance criteria
|
|
128
|
-
- One or two related tasks
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
## Milestone Planning
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
- **Milestone 1: MVP** - Core functionality only, simplest path to value
|
|
133
|
-
- **Milestone 2: Feature Complete** - All planned functionality, edge cases handled
|
|
134
|
-
- **Milestone 3: Polish & Optimization** - Performance, UX enhancements, accessibility
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
## Epic Size Guidelines
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
- **Small Epic**: 15-30 story points (1-2 sprints)
|
|
139
|
-
- **Medium Epic**: 30-60 story points (2-4 sprints)
|
|
140
|
-
- **Large Epic**: 60-100 story points (4-6 sprints)
|
|
141
|
-
- **Initiative**: >100 story points (break into multiple epics)
|
|
142
|
-
|
|
143
|
-
## Quality Checklist
|
|
144
|
-
|
|
145
|
-
Before creating epic:
|
|
146
|
-
- [ ] Problem statement is clear and specific
|
|
147
|
-
- [ ] Goals are measurable
|
|
148
|
-
- [ ] Success metrics defined
|
|
149
|
-
- [ ] At least 2 milestones planned
|
|
150
|
-
- [ ] Stories grouped logically
|
|
151
|
-
- [ ] Dependencies identified
|
|
152
|
-
- [ ] Risks acknowledged with mitigations
|
|
153
|
-
- [ ] Out-of-scope explicitly stated
|
|
154
|
-
|
|
155
|
-
## Risk Management
|
|
156
|
-
|
|
157
|
-
**Common Risks**:
|
|
158
|
-
- **Scope creep**: Clearly define out-of-scope items
|
|
159
|
-
- **Technical unknowns**: Spike stories for research
|
|
160
|
-
- **Resource constraints**: Buffer time in estimates
|
|
161
|
-
- **Dependency delays**: Identify critical path early
|
|
162
|
-
|
|
163
|
-
**Risk Format**:
|
|
164
|
-
```markdown
|
|
165
|
-
**Risks**:
|
|
166
|
-
- **Risk**: Integration with legacy system may be complex
|
|
167
|
-
**Impact**: High (could delay Milestone 2 by 2 weeks)
|
|
168
|
-
**Mitigation**: Allocate spike story to investigate (5 pts)
|
|
169
|
-
**Owner**: Backend Lead
|
|
170
|
-
```
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
## Integration
|
|
173
|
-
|
|
174
|
-
- **agileflow-story-writer**: Creates individual stories for the epic
|
|
175
|
-
- **agileflow-sprint-planner**: Assigns stories to sprints
|
|
176
|
-
- **agileflow-adr**: Links architectural decisions made during epic
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
178
|
-
## Notes
|
|
179
|
-
|
|
180
|
-
- Epics are living documents - update as you learn
|
|
181
|
-
- Don't over-plan - detail emerges during execution
|
|
182
|
-
- Review epic scope at sprint planning
|
|
183
|
-
- Celebrate milestone completions
|
|
184
|
-
- Link to ADRs for major technical decisions
|
|
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: agileflow-retro-facilitator
|
|
3
|
-
description: Structures retrospective discussions using Start/Stop/Continue format with action items and accountability. Loads during retrospective conversations or sprint reviews.
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
# AgileFlow Retro Facilitator
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
Facilitates sprint retrospectives by structuring feedback, identifying actionable improvements, and tracking action items across sprints.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
This skill activates when:
|
|
13
|
-
- Keywords: "retrospective", "retro", "sprint review"
|
|
14
|
-
- Discussing what went well/poorly in a sprint
|
|
15
|
-
- Keywords: "lessons learned", "process improvements", "reflect on..."
|
|
16
|
-
- Gathering team feedback
|
|
17
|
-
- Running sprint reviews
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
## Variables
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
- default_format: start-stop-continue
|
|
22
|
-
- track_action_items: true
|
|
23
|
-
- include_metrics: true
|
|
24
|
-
- save_to_docs: true
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Cookbook
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
Based on the context, select the appropriate retro format:
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
### Start/Stop/Continue (Default)
|
|
31
|
-
If running a standard sprint retrospective:
|
|
32
|
-
Then read and execute cookbook/start-stop-continue.md
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
Examples:
|
|
35
|
-
- "run a retro for sprint 5"
|
|
36
|
-
- "sprint retrospective"
|
|
37
|
-
- "what went well this sprint?"
|
|
38
|
-
- "let's do a retro"
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
### Glad/Sad/Mad
|
|
41
|
-
If discussing team dynamics, emotions, or interpersonal issues:
|
|
42
|
-
Then read cookbook/glad-sad-mad.md
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
Examples:
|
|
45
|
-
- "the team seems frustrated"
|
|
46
|
-
- "morale is low, let's talk about it"
|
|
47
|
-
- "team dynamics retro"
|
|
48
|
-
- "emotional check-in"
|
|
49
|
-
- "glad sad mad retro"
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
### 4Ls (Liked, Learned, Lacked, Longed For)
|
|
52
|
-
If focusing on learning and growth:
|
|
53
|
-
Then read cookbook/4ls.md
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
Examples:
|
|
56
|
-
- "learning retrospective"
|
|
57
|
-
- "what did we learn this sprint?"
|
|
58
|
-
- "growth-focused retro"
|
|
59
|
-
- "4Ls retro"
|
|
60
|
-
- "liked learned lacked longed"
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
## Workflow
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
1. Identify which format to use (check user request against Cookbook)
|
|
65
|
-
2. Read the appropriate cookbook file for detailed template
|
|
66
|
-
3. Gather feedback using that format's structure
|
|
67
|
-
4. Create SMART action items (read prompts/action-items.md for guidance)
|
|
68
|
-
5. Document in docs/08-project/retros/
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
## What This Does
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
1. Structures retrospective using the selected format
|
|
73
|
-
2. Gathers feedback on what went well and what didn't
|
|
74
|
-
3. Identifies patterns and root causes
|
|
75
|
-
4. Creates SMART action items with owners and due dates
|
|
76
|
-
5. Reviews previous action items
|
|
77
|
-
6. Captures insights for next sprint
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
## Instructions
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
1. **Set the stage**:
|
|
82
|
-
- Review sprint metrics (velocity, completion rate)
|
|
83
|
-
- Check previous action items
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
2. **Gather feedback** (using selected format):
|
|
86
|
-
- Use the cookbook file template
|
|
87
|
-
- Ensure all voices are heard
|
|
88
|
-
- Time-box each section
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
3. **Identify patterns**:
|
|
91
|
-
- Group similar feedback
|
|
92
|
-
- Find root causes
|
|
93
|
-
- Spot recurring themes
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
4. **Create action items** (see prompts/action-items.md):
|
|
96
|
-
- Specific, actionable steps
|
|
97
|
-
- Assign owners
|
|
98
|
-
- Set due dates
|
|
99
|
-
- Define success criteria
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
|
-
5. **Document and share**:
|
|
102
|
-
- Save in `docs/08-project/retros/`
|
|
103
|
-
- Share with team
|
|
104
|
-
- Add action items to backlog if needed
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
## Integration
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
- **agileflow-sprint-planner**: Retro insights inform next sprint planning
|
|
109
|
-
- **agileflow-tech-debt**: Identifies tech debt to address
|
|
110
|
-
- **agileflow-story-writer**: Improves story writing process
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
## Notes
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
- Retros are for the team, not management reporting
|
|
115
|
-
- Psychological safety is critical for honest feedback
|
|
116
|
-
- Action items should be small and achievable
|
|
117
|
-
- Track action item completion rate (target: >80%)
|
|
118
|
-
- Vary retro format to keep it fresh
|
|
119
|
-
- Celebrate wins, don't just focus on problems
|
|
@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# 4Ls Retrospective Format
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
Best for learning-focused retros. Use when emphasizing growth, skill development, or process discovery.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
- After learning sprints or experiments
|
|
8
|
-
- When onboarding new team members
|
|
9
|
-
- Quarterly or milestone retros
|
|
10
|
-
- After trying new tools or processes
|
|
11
|
-
- When team wants to focus on growth
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## Template
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
```markdown
|
|
16
|
-
# 4Ls Retrospective
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
19
|
-
**Facilitator**: [Name]
|
|
20
|
-
**Attendees**: [Team members present]
|
|
21
|
-
**Focus**: [Learning theme or milestone]
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## Liked (What we enjoyed)
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
- [Liked 1: Enjoyable aspect of work]
|
|
26
|
-
- [Liked 2: Positive experience]
|
|
27
|
-
- [Liked 3: Successful collaboration]
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Learned (New knowledge or skills)
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
- [Learned 1: Technical skill acquired]
|
|
32
|
-
- [Learned 2: Process insight]
|
|
33
|
-
- [Learned 3: Team dynamic discovery]
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
## Lacked (What was missing)
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
- [Lacked 1: Resource or tool needed]
|
|
38
|
-
- [Lacked 2: Knowledge gap]
|
|
39
|
-
- [Lacked 3: Support or guidance needed]
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## Longed For (What we wish we had)
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
- [Longed 1: Ideal state or tool]
|
|
44
|
-
- [Longed 2: Process improvement]
|
|
45
|
-
- [Longed 3: Future capability]
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
## Key Learnings to Document
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
| Learning | Source | How to Apply |
|
|
50
|
-
|----------|--------|--------------|
|
|
51
|
-
| [Learning 1] | [Sprint/Project] | [Next steps] |
|
|
52
|
-
| [Learning 2] | [Sprint/Project] | [Next steps] |
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
## Action Items
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
- [ ] **Address [Lacked item]** - @Owner - Due: [Date]
|
|
57
|
-
- [ ] **Move toward [Longed For item]** - @Owner - Due: [Date]
|
|
58
|
-
- [ ] **Document [Learned item]** - @Owner - Due: [Date]
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
## Knowledge Sharing Plan
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
- [How will learnings be shared with broader team?]
|
|
63
|
-
- [Documentation to create?]
|
|
64
|
-
- [Training or pairing sessions?]
|
|
65
|
-
```
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
## Facilitation Notes
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
**Focus on Growth**:
|
|
70
|
-
- Emphasize that gaps are opportunities, not failures
|
|
71
|
-
- Celebrate learning moments, even from mistakes
|
|
72
|
-
- Connect learnings to future improvements
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
**Timing**:
|
|
75
|
-
- Liked: 10 minutes
|
|
76
|
-
- Learned: 15 minutes
|
|
77
|
-
- Lacked: 10 minutes
|
|
78
|
-
- Longed For: 10 minutes
|
|
79
|
-
- Action Items: 10 minutes
|
|
80
|
-
- Total: ~55 minutes
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
**Tips**:
|
|
83
|
-
- "Learned" is the heart of this format - spend time here
|
|
84
|
-
- Turn "Lacked" into specific asks, not complaints
|
|
85
|
-
- "Longed For" should inspire, not depress
|
|
86
|
-
- Create concrete knowledge-sharing actions
|
|
@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Glad/Sad/Mad Retrospective Format
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
Best for emotional topics and team dynamics. Use when morale is low or interpersonal issues need addressing.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
## When to Use
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
- Team seems frustrated or burnt out
|
|
8
|
-
- Recent conflicts or tensions
|
|
9
|
-
- Major changes (team composition, process, tools)
|
|
10
|
-
- After particularly difficult sprints
|
|
11
|
-
- When standard retro feels stale
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
## Template
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
```markdown
|
|
16
|
-
# Glad/Sad/Mad Retrospective
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
19
|
-
**Facilitator**: [Name]
|
|
20
|
-
**Attendees**: [Team members present]
|
|
21
|
-
**Context**: [Why using this format]
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## Glad (Things that made us happy)
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
- [Glad 1: Celebration or positive moment]
|
|
26
|
-
- [Glad 2: Something that worked well]
|
|
27
|
-
- [Glad 3: Team success]
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Sad (Things that disappointed us)
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
- [Sad 1: Unmet expectation]
|
|
32
|
-
- [Sad 2: Missed opportunity]
|
|
33
|
-
- [Sad 3: Something we hoped would go better]
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
## Mad (Things that frustrated us)
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
- [Mad 1: Recurring problem]
|
|
38
|
-
- [Mad 2: Blocker or impediment]
|
|
39
|
-
- [Mad 3: Process that isn't working]
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
## Patterns Identified
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
- [Pattern 1: Theme across categories]
|
|
44
|
-
- [Pattern 2: Root cause analysis]
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## Action Items
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
- [ ] **[Action 1]** - @Owner - Due: [Date]
|
|
49
|
-
- Addresses: [Which Sad/Mad item]
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
- [ ] **[Action 2]** - @Owner - Due: [Date]
|
|
52
|
-
- Addresses: [Which Sad/Mad item]
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
## What We Want to Protect
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
- [Glad item to protect and maintain]
|
|
57
|
-
- [Process or practice to keep]
|
|
58
|
-
```
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
## Facilitation Notes
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
**Creating Psychological Safety**:
|
|
63
|
-
- Acknowledge that emotions are valid
|
|
64
|
-
- Focus on situations, not individuals
|
|
65
|
-
- Use "I feel..." statements
|
|
66
|
-
- Allow venting, then redirect to solutions
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
**Timing**:
|
|
69
|
-
- Glad: 10 minutes
|
|
70
|
-
- Sad: 15 minutes
|
|
71
|
-
- Mad: 15 minutes
|
|
72
|
-
- Action Items: 15 minutes
|
|
73
|
-
- Total: ~60 minutes
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
**Tips**:
|
|
76
|
-
- Start with Glad to set positive tone
|
|
77
|
-
- Let people express frustration fully before problem-solving
|
|
78
|
-
- End with concrete actions to channel emotions productively
|
|
79
|
-
- Follow up on emotional items in 1:1s if needed
|