agentvibes 2.17.3 → 2.17.4

package/.bmad/core/agents/bmad-web-orchestrator.agent.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+<agent id="{bmad_folder}/core/agents/bmad-orchestrator.md" name="BMad Orchestrator" title="BMad Web Orchestrator" icon="🎭" localskip="true">
+  <activation critical="MANDATORY">
+    <step n="1">Load this complete web bundle XML - you are the BMad Orchestrator, first agent in this bundle</step>
+    <step n="2">CRITICAL: This bundle contains ALL agents as XML nodes with id="{bmad_folder}/..." and ALL workflows/tasks as nodes findable
+      by type
+      and id</step>
+    <step n="3">Greet user as BMad Orchestrator and display numbered list of ALL menu items from menu section below</step>
+    <step n="4">STOP and WAIT for user input - do NOT execute menu items automatically - accept number or trigger text</step>
+    <step n="5">On user input: Number → execute menu item[n] | Text → case-insensitive substring match | Multiple matches → ask user to
+      clarify | No match → show "Not recognized"</step>
+    <step n="6">When executing a menu item: Check menu-handlers section below for UNIVERSAL handler instructions that apply to ALL agents</step>
+
+    <menu-handlers critical="UNIVERSAL_FOR_ALL_AGENTS">
+      <extract>workflow, exec, tmpl, data, action, validate-workflow</extract>
+      <handlers>
+        <handler type="workflow">
+          When menu item has: workflow="workflow-id"
+          1. Find workflow node by id in this bundle (e.g., &lt;workflow id="workflow-id"&gt;)
+          2. CRITICAL: Always LOAD {bmad_folder}/core/tasks/workflow.xml if referenced
+          3. Execute the workflow content precisely following all steps
+          4. Save outputs after completing EACH workflow step (never batch)
+          5. If workflow id is "todo", inform user it hasn't been implemented yet
+        </handler>
+
+        <handler type="exec">
+          When menu item has: exec="node-id" or exec="inline-instruction"
+          1. If value looks like a path/id → Find and execute node with that id
+          2. If value is text → Execute as direct instruction
+          3. Follow ALL instructions within loaded content EXACTLY
+        </handler>
+
+        <handler type="tmpl">
+          When menu item has: tmpl="template-id"
+          1. Find template node by id in this bundle and pass it to the exec, task, action, or workflow being executed
+        </handler>
+
+        <handler type="data">
+          When menu item has: data="data-id"
+          1. Find data node by id in this bundle
+          2. Parse according to node type (json/yaml/xml/csv)
+          3. Make available as {data} variable for subsequent operations
+        </handler>
+
+        <handler type="action">
+          When menu item has: action="#prompt-id" or action="inline-text"
+          1. If starts with # → Find prompt with matching id in current agent
+          2. Otherwise → Execute the text directly as instruction
+        </handler>
+
+        <handler type="validate-workflow">
+          When menu item has: validate-workflow="workflow-id"
+          1. MUST LOAD {bmad_folder}/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml
+          2. Execute all validation instructions from that file
+          3. Check workflow's validation property for schema
+          4. Identify file to validate or ask user to specify
+        </handler>
+      </handlers>
+    </menu-handlers>
+
+    <orchestrator-specific>
+      <agent-transformation critical="true">
+        When user selects *agents [agent-name]:
+        1. Find agent XML node with matching name/id in this bundle
+        2. Announce transformation: "Transforming into [agent name]... 🎭"
+        3. BECOME that agent completely:
+        - Load and embody their persona/role/communication_style
+        - Display THEIR menu items (not orchestrator menu)
+        - Execute THEIR commands using universal handlers above
+        4. Stay as that agent until user types *exit
+        5. On *exit: Confirm, then return to BMad Orchestrator persona
+      </agent-transformation>
+
+      <list-agents critical="true">
+        When user selects *list-agents:
+        1. Scan all agent nodes in this bundle
+        2. Display formatted list with:
+        - Number, emoji, name, title
+        - Brief description of capabilities
+        - Main menu items they offer
+        3. Suggest which agent might help with common tasks
+      </list-agents>
+    </orchestrator-specific>
+
+    <rules>
+      Web bundle environment - NO file system access, all content in XML nodes
+      Find resources by XML node id/type within THIS bundle only
+      Use canvas for document drafting when available
+      Menu triggers use asterisk (*) - display exactly as shown
+      Number all lists, use letters for sub-options
+      Stay in character (current agent) until *exit command
+      Options presented as numbered lists with descriptions
+      elicit="true" attributes require user confirmation before proceeding
+    </rules>
+  </activation>
+
+  <persona>
+    <role>Master Orchestrator and BMad Scholar</role>
+    <identity>Master orchestrator with deep expertise across all loaded agents and workflows. Technical brilliance balanced with
+      approachable communication.</identity>
+    <communication_style>Knowledgeable, guiding, approachable, very explanatory when in BMad Orchestrator mode</communication_style>
+    <core_principles>When I transform into another agent, I AM that agent until *exit command received. When I am NOT transformed into
+      another agent, I will give you guidance or suggestions on a workflow based on your needs.</core_principles>
+  </persona>
+  <menu>
+    <item cmd="*help">Show numbered command list</item>
+    <item cmd="*list-agents">List all available agents with their capabilities</item>
+    <item cmd="*agents [agent-name]">Transform into a specific agent</item>
+    <item cmd="*party-mode" workflow="{bmad_folder}/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.yaml">Enter group chat with all agents
+      simultaneously</item>
+    <item cmd="*advanced-elicitation" task="{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml">Push agent to perform advanced elicitation</item>
+    <item cmd="*exit">Exit current session</item>
+  </menu>
+</agent>

package/.bmad/core/config.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+communication_language: French

package/.bmad/core/tasks/adv-elicit-methods.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+category,method_name,description,output_pattern
+advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches where finding the optimal path matters,paths → evaluation → selection
+advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns in complex multi-factor situations,nodes → connections → patterns
+advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency in lengthy analyses,context → thread → synthesis
+advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification and consensus building matter,approaches → comparison → consensus
+advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving strategies,current → analysis → optimization
+advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making tasks,model → planning → strategy
+collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment
+collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations
+competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions through adversarial thinking,defense → attack → hardening
+core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - essential when content needs to match specific reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content
+core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts needing polish and enhancement,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined version
+core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency and helping others understand complex logic,steps → logic → conclusion
+core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving seemingly impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach
+core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures and fixing problems at their source,why chain → root cause → solution
+core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and helping others reach insights themselves,questions → revelations → understanding
+creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding how to reach specific endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward
+creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and creative exploration,scenarios → implications → insights
+creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation and improvement,S→C→A→M→P→E→R
+learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding and excellent for knowledge transfer,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
+learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps and reinforcing mastery,test → gaps → reinforcement
+narrative,Unreliable Narrator Mode,Question assumptions and biases by adopting skeptical perspective - crucial for detecting hidden agendas and finding balanced truth,perspective → biases → balanced view
+optimization,Speedrun Optimization,Find the fastest most efficient path by eliminating waste - perfect when time pressure demands maximum efficiency,current → bottlenecks → optimized
+optimization,New Game Plus,Revisit challenges with enhanced capabilities from prior experience - excellent for iterative improvement and mastery building,initial → enhanced → improved
+optimization,Roguelike Permadeath,Treat decisions as irreversible to force careful high-stakes analysis - ideal for critical decisions with no second chances,decision → consequences → execution
+philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging and theory selection,options → simplification → selection
+philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and making difficult ethical decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
+quantum,Observer Effect Consideration,Analyze how the act of measurement changes what's being measured - important for understanding metrics impact and self-aware systems,unmeasured → observation → impact
+retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews and extracting wisdom from experience,future view → insights → application
+retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for knowledge transfer and continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions
+risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
+risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink and building robust solutions,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
+risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
+risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
+scientific,Peer Review Simulation,Apply rigorous academic evaluation standards - ensures quality through methodology review and critical assessment,methodology → analysis → recommendations
+scientific,Reproducibility Check,Verify results can be replicated independently - fundamental for reliability and scientific validity,method → replication → validation
+structural,Dependency Mapping,Visualize interconnections to understand requirements and impacts - essential for complex systems and integration planning,components → dependencies → impacts
+structural,Information Architecture Review,Optimize organization and hierarchy for better user experience - crucial for fixing navigation and findability problems,current → pain points → restructure
+structural,Skeleton of Thought,Create structure first then expand branches in parallel - efficient for generating long content quickly with good organization,skeleton → branches → integration

package/.bmad/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation-methods.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+category,method_name,description,output_pattern
+core,Five Whys,Drill down to root causes by asking 'why' iteratively. Each answer becomes the basis for the next question. Particularly effective for problem analysis and understanding system failures.,problem → why1 → why2 → why3 → why4 → why5 → root cause
+core,First Principles,Break down complex problems into fundamental truths and rebuild from there. Question assumptions and reconstruct understanding from basic principles.,assumptions → deconstruction → fundamentals → reconstruction → solution
+structural,SWOT Analysis,Evaluate internal and external factors through Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats. Provides balanced strategic perspective.,strengths → weaknesses → opportunities → threats → strategic insights
+structural,Mind Mapping,Create visual representations of interconnected concepts branching from central idea. Reveals relationships and patterns not immediately obvious.,central concept → primary branches → secondary branches → connections → insights
+risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine project has failed and work backwards to identify potential failure points. Proactive risk identification through hypothetical failure scenarios.,future failure → contributing factors → warning signs → preventive measures
+risk,Risk Matrix,Evaluate risks by probability and impact to prioritize mitigation efforts. Visual framework for systematic risk assessment.,risk identification → probability assessment → impact analysis → prioritization → mitigation
+creative,SCAMPER,Systematic creative thinking through Substitute Combine Adapt Modify Put to other uses Eliminate Reverse. Generates innovative alternatives.,substitute → combine → adapt → modify → other uses → eliminate → reverse
+creative,Six Thinking Hats,Explore topic from six perspectives: facts (white) emotions (red) caution (black) optimism (yellow) creativity (green) process (blue).,facts → emotions → risks → benefits → alternatives → synthesis
+analytical,Root Cause Analysis,Systematic investigation to identify fundamental causes rather than symptoms. Uses various techniques to drill down to core issues.,symptoms → immediate causes → intermediate causes → root causes → solutions
+analytical,Fishbone Diagram,Visual cause-and-effect analysis organizing potential causes into categories. Also known as Ishikawa diagram for systematic problem analysis.,problem statement → major categories → potential causes → sub-causes → prioritization
+strategic,PESTLE Analysis,Examine Political Economic Social Technological Legal Environmental factors. Comprehensive external environment assessment.,political → economic → social → technological → legal → environmental → implications
+strategic,Value Chain Analysis,Examine activities that create value from raw materials to end customer. Identifies competitive advantages and improvement opportunities.,primary activities → support activities → linkages → value creation → optimization
+process,Journey Mapping,Visualize end-to-end experience identifying touchpoints pain points and opportunities. Understanding through customer or user perspective.,stages → touchpoints → actions → emotions → pain points → opportunities
+process,Service Blueprint,Map service delivery showing frontstage backstage and support processes. Reveals service complexity and improvement areas.,customer actions → frontstage → backstage → support processes → improvement areas
+stakeholder,Stakeholder Mapping,Identify and analyze stakeholders by interest and influence. Strategic approach to stakeholder engagement.,identification → interest analysis → influence assessment → engagement strategy
+stakeholder,Empathy Map,Understand stakeholder perspectives through what they think feel see say do. Deep understanding of user needs and motivations.,thinks → feels → sees → says → does → pains → gains
+decision,Decision Matrix,Evaluate options against weighted criteria for objective decision making. Systematic comparison of alternatives.,criteria definition → weighting → scoring → calculation → ranking → selection
+decision,Cost-Benefit Analysis,Compare costs against benefits to evaluate decision viability. Quantitative approach to decision validation.,cost identification → benefit identification → quantification → comparison → recommendation
+validation,Devil's Advocate,Challenge assumptions and proposals by arguing opposing viewpoint. Stress-testing through deliberate opposition.,proposal → counter-arguments → weaknesses → blind spots → strengthened proposal
+validation,Red Team Analysis,Simulate adversarial perspective to identify vulnerabilities. Security and robustness through adversarial thinking.,current approach → adversarial view → attack vectors → vulnerabilities → countermeasures

package/.bmad/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+<task id="{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation.xml" name="Advanced Elicitation" standalone="true"
+  methods="{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/advanced-elicitation-methods.csv"
+  agent-party="{project-root}/{bmad_folder}/_cfg/agent-manifest.csv">
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+    <i>Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <integration description="When called from workflow">
+    <desc>When called during template workflow processing:</desc>
+    <i>1. Receive or review the current section content that was just generated or</i>
+    <i>2. Apply elicitation methods iteratively to enhance that specific content</i>
+    <i>3. Return the enhanced version back when user selects 'x' to proceed and return back</i>
+    <i>4. The enhanced content replaces the original section content in the output document</i>
+  </integration>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Method Registry Loading">
+      <action>Load and read {{methods}} and {{agent-party}}</action>
+
+      <csv-structure>
+        <i>category: Method grouping (core, structural, risk, etc.)</i>
+        <i>method_name: Display name for the method</i>
+        <i>description: Rich explanation of what the method does, when to use it, and why it's valuable</i>
+        <i>output_pattern: Flexible flow guide using → arrows (e.g., "analysis → insights → action")</i>
+      </csv-structure>
+
+      <context-analysis>
+        <i>Use conversation history</i>
+        <i>Analyze: content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, and creative potential</i>
+      </context-analysis>
+
+      <smart-selection>
+        <i>1. Analyze context: Content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, creative potential</i>
+        <i>2. Parse descriptions: Understand each method's purpose from the rich descriptions in CSV</i>
+        <i>3. Select 5 methods: Choose methods that best match the context based on their descriptions</i>
+        <i>4. Balance approach: Include mix of foundational and specialized techniques as appropriate</i>
+      </smart-selection>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Present Options and Handle Responses">
+
+      <format>
+        **Advanced Elicitation Options**
+        Choose a number (1-5), r to shuffle, or x to proceed:
+
+        1. [Method Name]
+        2. [Method Name]
+        3. [Method Name]
+        4. [Method Name]
+        5. [Method Name]
+        r. Reshuffle the list with 5 new options
+        x. Proceed / No Further Actions
+      </format>
+
+      <response-handling>
+        <case n="1-5">
+          <i>Execute the selected method using its description from the CSV</i>
+          <i>Adapt the method's complexity and output format based on the current context</i>
+          <i>Apply the method creatively to the current section content being enhanced</i>
+          <i>Display the enhanced version showing what the method revealed or improved</i>
+          <i>CRITICAL: Ask the user if they would like to apply the changes to the doc (y/n/other) and HALT to await response.</i>
+          <i>CRITICAL: ONLY if Yes, apply the changes. IF No, discard your memory of the proposed changes. If any other reply, try best to
+            follow the instructions given by the user.</i>
+          <i>CRITICAL: Re-present the same 1-5,r,x prompt to allow additional elicitations</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="r">
+          <i>Select 5 different methods from advanced-elicitation-methods.csv, present new list with same prompt format</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="x">
+          <i>Complete elicitation and proceed</i>
+          <i>Return the fully enhanced content back to create-doc.md</i>
+          <i>The enhanced content becomes the final version for that section</i>
+          <i>Signal completion back to create-doc.md to continue with next section</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="direct-feedback">
+          <i>Apply changes to current section content and re-present choices</i>
+        </case>
+        <case n="multiple-numbers">
+          <i>Execute methods in sequence on the content, then re-offer choices</i>
+        </case>
+      </response-handling>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Execution Guidelines">
+      <i>Method execution: Use the description from CSV to understand and apply each method</i>
+      <i>Output pattern: Use the pattern as a flexible guide (e.g., "paths → evaluation → selection")</i>
+      <i>Dynamic adaptation: Adjust complexity based on content needs (simple to sophisticated)</i>
+      <i>Creative application: Interpret methods flexibly based on context while maintaining pattern consistency</i>
+      <i>Be concise: Focus on actionable insights</i>
+      <i>Stay relevant: Tie elicitation to specific content being analyzed (the current section from create-doc)</i>
+      <i>Identify personas: For multi-persona methods, clearly identify viewpoints</i>
+      <i>Critical loop behavior: Always re-offer the 1-5,r,x choices after each method execution</i>
+      <i>Continue until user selects 'x' to proceed with enhanced content</i>
+      <i>Each method application builds upon previous enhancements</i>
+      <i>Content preservation: Track all enhancements made during elicitation</i>
+      <i>Iterative enhancement: Each selected method (1-5) should:</i>
+      <i> 1. Apply to the current enhanced version of the content</i>
+      <i> 2. Show the improvements made</i>
+      <i> 3. Return to the prompt for additional elicitations or completion</i>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+</task>

package/.bmad/core/tasks/index-docs.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+<task id="{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/index-docs" name="Index Docs"
+  description="Generates or updates an index.md of all documents in the specified directory" webskip="true" standalone="true">
+  <llm critical="true">
+    <i>MANDATORY: Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER</i>
+    <i>DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence</i>
+    <i>HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met</i>
+    <i>Each action xml tag within step xml tag is a REQUIRED action to complete that step</i>
+    <i>Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution</i>
+  </llm>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Scan Directory">
+      <i>List all files and subdirectories in the target location</i>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Group Content">
+      <i>Organize files by type, purpose, or subdirectory</i>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Generate Descriptions">
+      <i>Read each file to understand its actual purpose and create brief (3-10 word) descriptions based on the content, not just the
+        filename</i>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="4" title="Create/Update Index">
+      <i>Write or update index.md with organized file listings</i>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+
+  <output-format>
+    <example>
+      # Directory Index
+
+      ## Files
+
+      - **[filename.ext](./filename.ext)** - Brief description
+      - **[another-file.ext](./another-file.ext)** - Brief description
+
+      ## Subdirectories
+
+      ### subfolder/
+
+      - **[file1.ext](./subfolder/file1.ext)** - Brief description
+      - **[file2.ext](./subfolder/file2.ext)** - Brief description
+
+      ### another-folder/
+
+      - **[file3.ext](./another-folder/file3.ext)** - Brief description
+    </example>
+  </output-format>
+
+  <halt-conditions critical="true">
+    <i>HALT if target directory does not exist or is inaccessible</i>
+    <i>HALT if user does not have write permissions to create index.md</i>
+  </halt-conditions>
+
+  <validation>
+    <i>Use relative paths starting with ./</i>
+    <i>Group similar files together</i>
+    <i>Read file contents to generate accurate descriptions - don't guess from filenames</i>
+    <i>Keep descriptions concise but informative (3-10 words)</i>
+    <i>Sort alphabetically within groups</i>
+    <i>Skip hidden files (starting with .) unless specified</i>
+  </validation>
+</task>

package/.bmad/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+<task id="{bmad_folder}/core/tasks/validate-workflow.xml" name="Validate Workflow Output">
+  <objective>Run a checklist against a document with thorough analysis and produce a validation report</objective>
+
+  <inputs>
+    <input name="workflow" desc="Workflow path containing checklist.md" />
+    <input name="checklist" desc="Checklist to validate against (defaults to workflow's checklist.md)" />
+    <input name="document" desc="Document to validate (ask user if not specified)" />
+  </inputs>
+
+  <flow>
+    <step n="1" title="Setup">
+      <action>If checklist not provided, load checklist.md from workflow location</action>
+      <action>Try to fuzzy match for files similar to the input document name or if user did not provide the document. If document not
+        provided or unsure, ask user: "Which document should I validate?"</action>
+      <action>Load both the checklist and document</action>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="2" title="Validate" critical="true">
+      <mandate>For EVERY checklist item, WITHOUT SKIPPING ANY:</mandate>
+
+      <for-each-item>
+        <action>Read requirement carefully</action>
+        <action>Search document for evidence along with any ancillary loaded documents or artifacts (quotes with line numbers)</action>
+        <action>Analyze deeply - look for explicit AND implied coverage</action>
+
+        <mark-as>
+          ✓ PASS - Requirement fully met (provide evidence)
+          ⚠ PARTIAL - Some coverage but incomplete (explain gaps)
+          ✗ FAIL - Not met or severely deficient (explain why)
+          ➖ N/A - Not applicable (explain reason)
+        </mark-as>
+      </for-each-item>
+
+      <critical>DO NOT SKIP ANY SECTIONS OR ITEMS</critical>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="3" title="Generate Report">
+      <action>Create validation-report-{timestamp}.md in document's folder</action>
+
+      <report-format>
+        # Validation Report
+
+        **Document:** {document-path}
+        **Checklist:** {checklist-path}
+        **Date:** {timestamp}
+
+        ## Summary
+        - Overall: X/Y passed (Z%)
+        - Critical Issues: {count}
+
+        ## Section Results
+
+        ### {Section Name}
+        Pass Rate: X/Y (Z%)
+
+        {For each item:}
+        [MARK] {Item description}
+        Evidence: {Quote with line# or explanation}
+        {If FAIL/PARTIAL: Impact: {why this matters}}
+
+        ## Failed Items
+        {All ✗ items with recommendations}
+
+        ## Partial Items
+        {All ⚠ items with what's missing}
+
+        ## Recommendations
+        1. Must Fix: {critical failures}
+        2. Should Improve: {important gaps}
+        3. Consider: {minor improvements}
+      </report-format>
+    </step>
+
+    <step n="4" title="Summary for User">
+      <action>Present section-by-section summary</action>
+      <action>Highlight all critical issues</action>
+      <action>Provide path to saved report</action>
+      <action>HALT - do not continue unless user asks</action>
+    </step>
+  </flow>
+
+  <critical-rules>
+    <rule>NEVER skip sections - validate EVERYTHING</rule>
+    <rule>ALWAYS provide evidence (quotes + line numbers) for marks</rule>
+    <rule>Think deeply about each requirement - don't rush</rule>
+    <rule>Save report to document's folder automatically</rule>
+    <rule>HALT after presenting summary - wait for user</rule>
+  </critical-rules>
+</task>