@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.13.0 → 1.15.1

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-dev/steps/step-04-self-check.md

@@ -1,107 +0,0 @@
----
----
-
-# Step 4: Self-Check
-
-**Goal:** Audit completed work against tasks, tests, AC, and patterns before external review.
-
----
-
-## AVAILABLE STATE
-
-From previous steps:
-
-- `{baseline_commit}` - Git HEAD at workflow start
-- `{execution_mode}` - "tech-spec" or "direct"
-- `{tech_spec_path}` - Tech-spec file (if Mode A)
-- `{project_context}` - Project patterns (if exists)
-
----
-
-## SELF-CHECK AUDIT
-
-### 1. Tasks Complete
-
-Verify all tasks are marked complete:
-
-- [ ] All tasks from tech-spec or mental plan marked `[x]`
-- [ ] No tasks skipped without documented reason
-- [ ] Any blocked tasks have clear explanation
-
-### 2. Tests Passing
-
-Verify test status:
-
-- [ ] All existing tests still pass
-- [ ] New tests written for new functionality
-- [ ] No test warnings or skipped tests without reason
-
-### 3. Acceptance Criteria Satisfied
-
-For each AC:
-
-- [ ] AC is demonstrably met
-- [ ] Can explain how implementation satisfies AC
-- [ ] Edge cases considered
-
-### 4. Patterns Followed
-
-Verify code quality:
-
-- [ ] Follows existing code patterns in codebase
-- [ ] Follows project-context rules (if exists)
-- [ ] Error handling consistent with codebase
-- [ ] No obvious code smells introduced
-
----
-
-## UPDATE TECH-SPEC (Mode A only)
-
-If `{execution_mode}` is "tech-spec":
-
-1. Load `{tech_spec_path}`
-2. Mark all tasks as `[x]` complete
-3. Update status to "Implementation Complete"
-4. Save changes
-
----
-
-## IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY
-
-Present summary to transition to review:
-
-```
-**Implementation Complete!**
-
-**Summary:** {what was implemented}
-**Files Modified:** {list of files}
-**Tests:** {test summary - passed/added/etc}
-**AC Status:** {all satisfied / issues noted}
-
-Proceeding to adversarial code review...
-```
-
----
-
-## NEXT STEP
-
-Proceed immediately to `./step-05-adversarial-review.md`.
-
----
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-- All tasks verified complete
-- All tests passing
-- All AC satisfied
-- Patterns followed
-- Tech-spec updated (if Mode A)
-- Summary presented
-
-## FAILURE MODES
-
-- Claiming tasks complete when they're not
-- Not running tests before proceeding
-- Missing AC verification
-- Ignoring pattern violations
-- Not updating tech-spec status (Mode A)

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-dev/steps/step-05-adversarial-review.md

@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
----
----
-
-# Step 5: Adversarial Code Review
-
-**Goal:** Construct diff of all changes, invoke adversarial review skill, present findings.
-
----
-
-## AVAILABLE STATE
-
-From previous steps:
-
-- `{baseline_commit}` - Git HEAD at workflow start (CRITICAL for diff)
-- `{execution_mode}` - "tech-spec" or "direct"
-- `{tech_spec_path}` - Tech-spec file (if Mode A)
-
----
-
-### 1. Construct Diff
-
-Build complete diff of all changes since workflow started.
-
-### If `{baseline_commit}` is a Git commit hash:
-
-**Tracked File Changes:**
-
-```bash
-git diff {baseline_commit}
-```
-
-**New Untracked Files:**
-Only include untracked files that YOU created during this workflow (steps 2-4).
-Do not include pre-existing untracked files.
-For each new file created, include its full content as a "new file" addition.
-
-### If `{baseline_commit}` is "NO_GIT":
-
-Use best-effort diff construction:
-
-- List all files you modified during steps 2-4
-- For each file, show the changes you made (before/after if you recall, or just current state)
-- Include any new files you created with their full content
-- Note: This is less precise than Git diff but still enables meaningful review
-
-### Capture as {diff_output}
-
-Merge all changes into `{diff_output}`.
-
-**Note:** Do NOT `git add` anything - this is read-only inspection.
-
----
-
-### 2. Invoke Adversarial Review
-
-With `{diff_output}` constructed, invoke the `xiaoma-review-adversarial-general` skill. If possible, use information asymmetry: invoke the skill in a separate subagent or process with read access to the project, but no context except the `{diff_output}`.
-
-Pass `{diff_output}` as the content to review. The skill should return a list of findings.
-
----
-
-### 3. Process Findings
-
-Capture the findings from the skill output.
-**If zero findings:** HALT - this is suspicious. Re-analyze or request user guidance.
-Evaluate severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) and validity (real, noise, undecided).
-DO NOT exclude findings based on severity or validity unless explicitly asked to do so.
-Order findings by severity.
-Number the ordered findings (F1, F2, F3, etc.).
-If TodoWrite or similar tool is available, turn each finding into a TODO, include ID, severity, validity, and description in the TODO; otherwise present findings as a table with columns: ID, Severity, Validity, Description
-
----
-
-## NEXT STEP
-
-With findings in hand, read fully and follow: `./step-06-resolve-findings.md` for user to choose resolution approach.
-
----
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-- Diff constructed from baseline_commit
-- New files included in diff
-- Skill invoked with diff as input
-- Findings received
-- Findings processed into TODOs or table and presented to user
-
-## FAILURE MODES
-
-- Missing baseline_commit (can't construct accurate diff)
-- Not including new untracked files in diff
-- Invoking skill without providing diff input
-- Accepting zero findings without questioning
-- Presenting fewer findings than the review skill returned without explicit instruction to do so

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-dev/steps/step-06-resolve-findings.md

@@ -1,144 +0,0 @@
----
----
-
-# Step 6: Resolve Findings
-
-**Goal:** Handle adversarial review findings interactively, apply fixes, finalize tech-spec.
-
----
-
-## AVAILABLE STATE
-
-From previous steps:
-
-- `{baseline_commit}` - Git HEAD at workflow start
-- `{execution_mode}` - "tech-spec" or "direct"
-- `{tech_spec_path}` - Tech-spec file (if Mode A)
-- Findings table from step-05
-
----
-
-## RESOLUTION OPTIONS
-
-Present: "How would you like to handle these findings?"
-
-Display:
-
-**[W] Walk through** - Discuss each finding individually
-**[F] Fix automatically** - Automatically fix issues classified as "real"
-**[S] Skip** - Acknowledge and proceed to commit
-
-### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF W: Execute WALK THROUGH section below
-- IF F: Execute FIX AUTOMATICALLY section below
-- IF S: Execute SKIP section below
-
-### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed when user makes a selection
-
----
-
-## WALK THROUGH [W]
-
-For each finding in order:
-
-1. Present the finding with context
-2. Ask: **fix now / skip / discuss**
-3. If fix: Apply the fix immediately
-4. If skip: Note as acknowledged, continue
-5. If discuss: Provide more context, re-ask
-6. Move to next finding
-
-After all findings processed, summarize what was fixed/skipped.
-
----
-
-## FIX AUTOMATICALLY [F]
-
-1. Filter findings to only those classified as "real"
-2. Apply fixes for each real finding
-3. Report what was fixed:
-
-```
-**Auto-fix Applied:**
-- F1: {description of fix}
-- F3: {description of fix}
-...
-
-Skipped (noise/uncertain): F2, F4
-```
-
----
-
-## SKIP [S]
-
-1. Acknowledge all findings were reviewed
-2. Note that user chose to proceed without fixes
-3. Continue to completion
-
----
-
-## UPDATE TECH-SPEC (Mode A only)
-
-If `{execution_mode}` is "tech-spec":
-
-1. Load `{tech_spec_path}`
-2. Update status to "Completed"
-3. Add review notes:
-   ```
-   ## Review Notes
-   - Adversarial review completed
-   - Findings: {count} total, {fixed} fixed, {skipped} skipped
-   - Resolution approach: {walk-through/auto-fix/skip}
-   ```
-4. Save changes
-
----
-
-## COMPLETION OUTPUT
-
-```
-**Review complete. Ready to commit.**
-
-**Implementation Summary:**
-- {what was implemented}
-- Files modified: {count}
-- Tests: {status}
-- Review findings: {X} addressed, {Y} skipped
-
-{Explain what was implemented based on user_skill_level}
-```
-
----
-
-## WORKFLOW COMPLETE
-
-This is the final step. The Quick Dev workflow is now complete.
-
-User can:
-
-- Commit changes
-- Run additional tests
-- Start new Quick Dev session
-
----
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-- User presented with resolution options
-- Chosen approach executed correctly
-- Fixes applied cleanly (if applicable)
-- Tech-spec updated with final status (Mode A)
-- Completion summary provided
-- User understands what was implemented
-
-## FAILURE MODES
-
-- Not presenting resolution options
-- Auto-fixing "noise" or "uncertain" findings
-- Not updating tech-spec after resolution (Mode A)
-- No completion summary
-- Leaving user unclear on next steps

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-dev/workflow.md

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# Quick Dev Workflow
-
-**Goal:** Execute implementation tasks efficiently, either from a tech-spec or direct user instructions.
-
-**Your Role:** You are an elite full-stack developer executing tasks autonomously. Follow patterns, ship code, run tests. Every response moves the project forward.
-
----
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **step-file architecture** for focused execution:
-
-- Each step loads fresh to combat "lost in the middle"
-- State persists via variables: `{baseline_commit}`, `{execution_mode}`, `{tech_spec_path}`
-- Sequential progression through implementation phases
-
----
-
-## INITIALIZATION
-
-### Configuration Loading
-
-Load config from `{project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/config.yaml` and resolve:
-
-- `user_name`, `communication_language`, `user_skill_level`
-- `planning_artifacts`, `implementation_artifacts`
-- `date` as system-generated current datetime
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Paths
-
-- `project_context` = `**/project-context.md` (load if exists)
-
----
-
-## EXECUTION
-
-Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-mode-detection.md` to begin the workflow.

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-dev/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-dev-new-preview/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/src/xmc/workflows/xiaoma-quick-flow/xiaoma-quick-spec/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/tools/cli/commands/install.js

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-const path = require('node:path');
-const prompts = require('../lib/prompts');
-const { Installer } = require('../installers/lib/core/installer');
-const { UI } = require('../lib/ui');
-
-const installer = new Installer();
-const ui = new UI();
-
-module.exports = {
-  command: 'install',
-  description: 'Install XiaoMa Core agents and tools',
-  options: [
-    ['-d, --debug', 'Enable debug output for manifest generation'],
-    ['--directory <path>', 'Installation directory (default: current directory)'],
-    ['--modules <modules>', 'Comma-separated list of module IDs to install (e.g., "xmc,bmb")'],
-    [
-      '--tools <tools>',
-      'Comma-separated list of tool/IDE IDs to configure (e.g., "claude-code,cursor"). Use "none" to skip tool configuration.',
-    ],
-    ['--custom-content <paths>', 'Comma-separated list of paths to custom modules/agents/workflows'],
-    ['--action <type>', 'Action type for existing installations: install, update, quick-update, or compile-agents'],
-    ['--user-name <name>', 'Name for agents to use (default: system username)'],
-    ['--communication-language <lang>', 'Language for agent communication (default: English)'],
-    ['--document-output-language <lang>', 'Language for document output (default: English)'],
-    ['--output-folder <path>', 'Output folder path relative to project root (default: _xiaoma-output)'],
-    ['-y, --yes', 'Accept all defaults and skip prompts where possible'],
-  ],
-  action: async (options) => {
-    try {
-      // Set debug flag as environment variable for all components
-      if (options.debug) {
-        process.env.XiaoMa_DEBUG_MANIFEST = 'true';
-        await prompts.log.info('Debug mode enabled');
-      }
-
-      const config = await ui.promptInstall(options);
-
-      // Handle cancel
-      if (config.actionType === 'cancel') {
-        await prompts.log.warn('Installation cancelled.');
-        process.exit(0);
-      }
-
-      // Handle quick update separately
-      if (config.actionType === 'quick-update') {
-        const result = await installer.quickUpdate(config);
-        await prompts.log.success('Quick update complete!');
-        await prompts.log.info(`Updated ${result.moduleCount} modules with preserved settings (${result.modules.join(', ')})`);
-        process.exit(0);
-      }
-
-      // Handle compile agents separately
-      if (config.actionType === 'compile-agents') {
-        const result = await installer.compileAgents(config);
-        await prompts.log.info(`Recompiled ${result.agentCount} agents with customizations applied`);
-        process.exit(0);
-      }
-
-      // Regular install/update flow
-      const result = await installer.install(config);
-
-      // Check if installation was cancelled
-      if (result && result.cancelled) {
-        process.exit(0);
-      }
-
-      // Check if installation succeeded
-      if (result && result.success) {
-        process.exit(0);
-      }
-    } catch (error) {
-      try {
-        if (error.fullMessage) {
-          await prompts.log.error(error.fullMessage);
-        } else {
-          await prompts.log.error(`Installation failed: ${error.message}`);
-        }
-        if (error.stack) {
-          await prompts.log.message(error.stack);
-        }
-      } catch {
-        console.error(error.fullMessage || error.message || error);
-      }
-      process.exit(1);
-    }
-  },
-};

package/tools/cli/external-official-modules.yaml

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-# External modules are not applicable for XiaoMa-CLI
-# These were upstream XiaoMa modules that are not forked
-
-modules: {}