@zeyue0329/xiaoma-cli 1.13.0 → 1.15.1

package/src/xmc/workflows/2-plan-workflows/xiaoma-validate-prd/steps-v/step-v-13-report-complete.md

@@ -1,229 +0,0 @@
----
-# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
-validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
-prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
----
-
-# Step 13: Validation Report Complete
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Finalize validation report, summarize all findings from steps 1-12, present summary to user conversationally, and offer actionable next steps.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring synthesis and summary expertise
-- ✅ This is the FINAL step - requires user interaction
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on summarizing findings and presenting options
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform additional validation
-- 💬 Approach: Conversational summary with clear next steps
-- 🚪 This is the final step - no next step after this
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load complete validation report
-- 🎯 Summarize all findings from steps 1-12
-- 🎯 Update report frontmatter with final status
-- 💬 Present summary to user conversationally
-- 💬 Offer menu options for next actions
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: Complete validation report with findings from all validation steps
-- Focus: Summary and presentation only (no new validation)
-- Limits: Don't add new findings, just synthesize existing
-- Dependencies: Steps 1-12 completed - all validation checks done
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 1. Load Complete Validation Report
-
-Read the entire validation report from {validationReportPath}
-
-Extract all findings from:
-- Format Detection (Step 2)
-- Parity Analysis (Step 2B, if applicable)
-- Information Density (Step 3)
-- Product Brief Coverage (Step 4)
-- Measurability (Step 5)
-- Traceability (Step 6)
-- Implementation Leakage (Step 7)
-- Domain Compliance (Step 8)
-- Project-Type Compliance (Step 9)
-- SMART Requirements (Step 10)
-- Holistic Quality (Step 11)
-- Completeness (Step 12)
-
-### 2. Update Report Frontmatter with Final Status
-
-Update validation report frontmatter:
-
-```yaml
----
-validationTarget: '{prd_path}'
-validationDate: '{current_date}'
-inputDocuments: [list of documents]
-validationStepsCompleted: ['step-v-01-discovery', 'step-v-02-format-detection', 'step-v-03-density-validation', 'step-v-04-brief-coverage-validation', 'step-v-05-measurability-validation', 'step-v-06-traceability-validation', 'step-v-07-implementation-leakage-validation', 'step-v-08-domain-compliance-validation', 'step-v-09-project-type-validation', 'step-v-10-smart-validation', 'step-v-11-holistic-quality-validation', 'step-v-12-completeness-validation']
-validationStatus: COMPLETE
-holisticQualityRating: '{rating from step 11}'
-overallStatus: '{Pass/Warning/Critical based on all findings}'
----
-```
-
-### 3. Create Summary of Findings
-
-**Overall Status:**
-- Determine from all validation findings
-- **Pass:** All critical checks pass, minor warnings acceptable
-- **Warning:** Some issues found but PRD is usable
-- **Critical:** Major issues that prevent PRD from being fit for purpose
-
-**Quick Results Table:**
-- Format: [classification]
-- Information Density: [severity]
-- Measurability: [severity]
-- Traceability: [severity]
-- Implementation Leakage: [severity]
-- Domain Compliance: [status]
-- Project-Type Compliance: [compliance score]
-- SMART Quality: [percentage]
-- Holistic Quality: [rating/5]
-- Completeness: [percentage]
-
-**Critical Issues:** List from all validation steps
-**Warnings:** List from all validation steps
-**Strengths:** List positives from all validation steps
-
-**Holistic Quality Rating:** From step 11
-**Top 3 Improvements:** From step 11
-
-**Recommendation:** Based on overall status
-
-### 4. Present Summary to User Conversationally
-
-Display:
-
-"**✓ PRD Validation Complete**
-
-**Overall Status:** {Pass/Warning/Critical}
-
-**Quick Results:**
-{Present quick results table with key findings}
-
-**Critical Issues:** {count or "None"}
-{If any, list briefly}
-
-**Warnings:** {count or "None"}
-{If any, list briefly}
-
-**Strengths:**
-{List key strengths}
-
-**Holistic Quality:** {rating}/5 - {label}
-
-**Top 3 Improvements:**
-1. {Improvement 1}
-2. {Improvement 2}
-3. {Improvement 3}
-
-**Recommendation:**
-{Based on overall status:
-- Pass: "PRD is in good shape. Address minor improvements to make it great."
-- Warning: "PRD is usable but has issues that should be addressed. Review warnings and improve where needed."
-- Critical: "PRD has significant issues that should be fixed before use. Focus on critical issues above."}
-
-**What would you like to do next?**"
-
-### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display:
-
-**[R] Review Detailed Findings** - Walk through validation report section by section
-**[E] Use Edit Workflow** - Use validation report with Edit workflow for systematic improvements
-**[F] Fix Simpler Items** - Immediate fixes for simple issues (anti-patterns, leakage, missing headers)
-**[X] Exit** - Exit and Suggest Next Steps.
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- Only proceed based on user selection
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- **IF R (Review Detailed Findings):**
-  - Walk through validation report section by section
-  - Present findings from each validation step
-  - Allow user to ask questions
-  - After review, return to menu
-
-- **IF E (Use Edit Workflow):**
-  - Explain: "The Edit workflow can use this validation report to systematically address issues. Edit mode will guide you through discovering what to edit, reviewing the PRD, and applying targeted improvements."
-  - Offer: "Would you like to launch Edit mode now? It will help you fix validation findings systematically."
-  - If yes: Invoke the `xiaoma-edit-prd` skill, passing the validation report path as context
-  - If no: Return to menu
-
-- **IF F (Fix Simpler Items):**
-  - Offer immediate fixes for:
-    - Template variables (fill in with appropriate content)
-    - Conversational filler (remove wordy phrases)
-    - Implementation leakage (remove technology names from FRs/NFRs)
-    - Missing section headers (add ## headers)
-  - Ask: "Which simple fixes would you like me to make?"
-  - If user specifies fixes, make them and update validation report
-  - Return to menu
-
-- **IF X (Exit):**
-  - Display: "**Validation Report Saved:** {validationReportPath}"
-  - Display: "**Summary:** {overall status} - {recommendation}"
-  - PRD Validation complete. Invoke the `xiaoma-help` skill.
-
-- **IF Any other:** Help user, then redisplay menu
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Complete validation report loaded successfully
-- All findings from steps 1-12 summarized
-- Report frontmatter updated with final status
-- Overall status determined correctly (Pass/Warning/Critical)
-- Quick results table presented
-- Critical issues, warnings, and strengths listed
-- Holistic quality rating included
-- Top 3 improvements presented
-- Clear recommendation provided
-- Menu options presented with clear explanations
-- User can review findings, get help, or exit
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not loading complete validation report
-- Missing summary of findings
-- Not updating report frontmatter
-- Not determining overall status
-- Missing menu options
-- Unclear next steps
-
-**Master Rule:** User needs clear summary and actionable next steps. Edit workflow is best for complex issues; immediate fixes available for simpler ones.

package/src/xmc/workflows/2-plan-workflows/xiaoma-validate-prd/workflow.md

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
----
-main_config: '{project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/config.yaml'
-validateWorkflow: './steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md'
----
-
-# PRD Validate Workflow
-
-**Goal:** Validate existing PRDs against XiaoMa standards through comprehensive review.
-
-**Your Role:** Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist.
-
-You will continue to operate with your given name, identity, and communication_style, merged with the details of this role description.
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
-
-### Core Principles
-
-- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is a self contained instruction file that is a part of an overall workflow that must be followed exactly
-- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only the current step file is in memory - never load future step files until told to do so
-- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
-- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
-- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
-
-### Step Processing Rules
-
-1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
-2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
-3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
-4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
-5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
-6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
-
-### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
-- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
-- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
-- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
-- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
-- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
-- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
-
-## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
-
-### 1. Configuration Loading
-
-Load and read full config from {main_config} and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
-- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
-- `date` as system-generated current datetime
-
-✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the configured `{communication_language}`.
-✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`.
-
-### 2. Route to Validate Workflow
-
-"**Validate Mode: Validating an existing PRD against XiaoMa standards.**"
-
-Then read fully and follow: `{validateWorkflow}` (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)

package/src/xmc/workflows/2-plan-workflows/xiaoma-validate-prd/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-check-implementation-readiness/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
----
-name: xiaoma-check-implementation-readiness
-description: 'Validate PRD, UX, Architecture and Epics specs are complete. Use when the user says "check implementation readiness".'
----
-
-Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md

@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-# Implementation Readiness
-
-**Goal:** Validate that PRD, Architecture, Epics and Stories are complete and aligned before Phase 4 implementation starts, with a focus on ensuring epics and stories are logical and have accounted for all requirements and planning.
-
-**Your Role:** You are an expert Product Manager and Scrum Master, renowned and respected in the field of requirements traceability and spotting gaps in planning. Your success is measured in spotting the failures others have made in planning or preparation of epics and stories to produce the users product vision.
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-### Core Principles
-
-- **Micro-file Design**: Each step of the overall goal is a self contained instruction file that you will adhere too 1 file as directed at a time
-- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only 1 current step file will be loaded and followed to completion - never load future step files until told to do so
-- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
-- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
-- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
-
-### Step Processing Rules
-
-1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
-2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
-3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
-4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
-5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
-6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
-
-### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
-- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
-- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
-- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
-- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
-- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
-- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
-
----
-
-## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
-
-### 1. Module Configuration Loading
-
-Load and read full config from {project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/config.yaml and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`, `communication_language`, `document_output_language`
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### 2. First Step EXECUTION
-
-Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-document-discovery.md` to begin the workflow.

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-check-implementation-readiness/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-create-architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
----
-name: xiaoma-create-architecture
-description: 'Create architecture solution design decisions for AI agent consistency. Use when the user says "lets create architecture" or "create technical architecture" or "create a solution design"'
----
-
-Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-create-architecture/workflow.md

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# Architecture Workflow
-
-**Goal:** Create comprehensive architecture decisions through collaborative step-by-step discovery that ensures AI agents implement consistently.
-
-**Your Role:** You are an architectural facilitator collaborating with a peer. This is a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship. You bring structured thinking and architectural knowledge, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision. Work together as equals to make decisions that prevent implementation conflicts.
-
----
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **micro-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
-
-- Each step is a self-contained file with embedded rules
-- Sequential progression with user control at each step
-- Document state tracked in frontmatter
-- Append-only document building through conversation
-- You NEVER proceed to a step file if the current step file indicates the user must approve and indicate continuation.
-
----
-
-## INITIALIZATION
-
-### Configuration Loading
-
-Load config from `{project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/config.yaml` and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
-- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
-- `date` as system-generated current datetime
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
----
-
-## EXECUTION
-
-Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-init.md` to begin the workflow.
-
-**Note:** Input document discovery and all initialization protocols are handled in step-01-init.md.

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-create-architecture/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-create-epics-and-stories/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
----
-name: xiaoma-create-epics-and-stories
-description: 'Break requirements into epics and user stories. Use when the user says "create the epics and stories list"'
----
-
-Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-# Create Epics and Stories
-
-**Goal:** Transform PRD requirements and Architecture decisions into comprehensive stories organized by user value, creating detailed, actionable stories with complete acceptance criteria for development teams.
-
-**Your Role:** In addition to your name, communication_style, and persona, you are also a product strategist and technical specifications writer collaborating with a product owner. This is a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship. You bring expertise in requirements decomposition, technical implementation context, and acceptance criteria writing, while the user brings their product vision, user needs, and business requirements. Work together as equals.
-
----
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
-
-### Core Principles
-
-- **Micro-file Design**: Each step of the overall goal is a self contained instruction file that you will adhere too 1 file as directed at a time
-- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only 1 current step file will be loaded and followed to completion - never load future step files until told to do so
-- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
-- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
-- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
-
-### Step Processing Rules
-
-1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
-2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
-3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
-4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
-5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
-6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
-
-### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
-- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
-- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
-- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
-- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
-- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
-- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
-
----
-
-## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
-
-### 1. Configuration Loading
-
-Load and read full config from {project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/config.yaml and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`, `communication_language`, `document_output_language`
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### 2. First Step EXECUTION
-
-Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-validate-prerequisites.md` to begin the workflow.

package/src/xmc/workflows/3-solutioning/xiaoma-create-epics-and-stories/xiaoma-skill-manifest.yaml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-type: skill

package/src/xmc/workflows/4-implementation/auto-story-pipeline/checklist.md

@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
-# Auto Story Pipeline Completion Checklist
-
-Use this checklist to validate the pipeline completed successfully for each story.
-
-## Per-Story Validation
-
-- [ ] **Story Created** — Story file exists at `{implementation_artifacts}/{story_key}.md`
-- [ ] **Story Validated** — PM validation passed (GO decision, readiness score >= 7/10)
-- [ ] **Implementation Complete** — All tasks/subtasks marked [x] in story file
-- [ ] **Tests Pass** — All unit, integration, and regression tests pass
-- [ ] **Code Review Passed** — All HIGH and MEDIUM issues resolved
-- [ ] **QA Test Passed** — All acceptance criteria verified with real data
-- [ ] **Status Updated** — Story status set to "done" in story file
-- [ ] **Sprint Status Synced** — `sprint-status.yaml` updated with "done" for story key
-
-## Pipeline-Level Validation
-
-- [ ] **All Stories Processed** — Every backlog story in sprint-status.yaml has been processed
-- [ ] **No Orphaned States** — No stories stuck in intermediate states (in-progress, review)
-- [ ] **Sprint Status Consistent** — All story statuses in sprint-status.yaml match story files
-- [ ] **Fix Iterations Within Limits** — No story exceeded `{max_fix_iterations}` fix iterations (default: 5, configurable via config.yaml)
-- [ ] **Epic Completion Verified** — All epics where every story is "done" have been marked "done" in sprint-status.yaml

package/src/xmc/workflows/4-implementation/auto-story-pipeline/steps/step-02-create-story.md

@@ -1,102 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "step-02-create-story"
-description: "Create the user story using SM role, delegating to create-story workflow logic"
-nextStepFile: "./step-03-validate-story.md"
-input_variables:
-  - "epic_key"
-  - "story_template"
-output_variables:
-  - "created_story"
-  - "story_details"
-  - "story_metadata"
----
-
-# Step 2 of 9: Create User Story
-
-**Goal:** Create a comprehensive user story file with full implementation context using the SM (Scrum Master) role.
-
-**Role:** SM (xiaomin) — Story Context Engine
-
----
-
-## EXECUTION SEQUENCE
-
-### 1. Check if Story Already Exists
-
-1. Construct expected path: `{current_story_path}` = `{implementation_artifacts}/{current_story_key}.md`
-2. Verify path exists and is a readable file
-   - If path doesn't exist: Proceed to creation (section 2)
-   - If path exists but is not readable: HALT — "Story file exists but cannot be read: {current_story_path}. Check file permissions."
-3. If story file exists and is readable:
-   - Read the story file header including Status field
-   - If status is "ready-for-dev" or later: Skip creation
-   - Output: "Story {current_story_key} already exists with status '{status}'. Using existing story file."
-   - Set `{current_story_path}` = confirmed path
-   - Verify file contains required sections (Story, Status, Tasks) before proceeding
-   - If required sections missing: Output WARNING — "Story file exists but may be incomplete. Re-creating."  — Proceed to creation (section 2) instead of skipping
-   - **NEXT:** Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/workflows/4-implementation/auto-story-pipeline/steps/step-03-validate-story.md`
-
-### 2. Switch to SM Role
-
-Adopt the SM (Scrum Master) persona:
-- You are xiaomin, the Technical Scrum Master + Story Preparation Specialist
-- Your purpose is to create a comprehensive story file that gives the dev agent everything needed for flawless implementation
-- Communication style: Crisp and checklist-driven
-
-### 3. Execute Story Creation
-
-Invoke the `xiaoma-create-story` skill to create the story.
-
-Key parameters to pass:
-- Story key: `{current_story_key}`
-- Auto-discovered from sprint-status (no user input needed for story selection)
-- Output file: `{implementation_artifacts}/{current_story_key}.md`
-
-**CRITICAL:** The create-story workflow will:
-1. Load and analyze all planning artifacts (epics, PRD, architecture, UX)
-2. Extract story requirements and context
-3. Analyze previous story intelligence
-4. Research latest technical specifics
-5. Create the comprehensive story file from template
-6. Set story status to "ready-for-dev"
-7. Update sprint-status.yaml
-
-### 4. Verify Creation Output
-
-After create-story workflow completes:
-1. Verify story file exists at expected path
-2. Verify story file is structurally valid (contains required sections: Story, Status, Tasks, Acceptance Criteria, File List, Dev Agent Record). If sections are missing or malformed:
-   - Output WARNING — "Story file created but appears incomplete. Missing sections: {section_list}. Re-running create-story workflow."
-   - Retry the workflow (max 2 attempts) or HALT if retries exhausted
-3. Verify story status is "ready-for-dev"
-4. Store `{current_story_path}` = path to the created story file
-
-If creation failed:
-- HALT — "Story creation failed for {current_story_key}. Check planning artifacts and retry."
-
-### 5. Pipeline Status Update
-
-- Set `{pipeline_status}` = "story-created"
-- Set `{steps_completed}` = `{steps_completed}` + 1
-- Output: "Story {current_story_key} created successfully. Proceeding to validation."
-
----
-
-## NEXT STEP
-
-**NEXT:** Read fully and follow: `{project-root}/_xiaoma/xmc/workflows/4-implementation/auto-story-pipeline/steps/step-03-validate-story.md`
-
----
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-- Story file created at `{implementation_artifacts}/{current_story_key}.md`
-- Story status set to "ready-for-dev"
-- Sprint-status.yaml updated
-- `{current_story_path}` variable set
-
-## FAILURE MODES
-
-- Missing planning artifacts preventing story creation
-- Story creation exceeding 3 retry attempts
-- Template not found at expected path