@ybotok/loam 0.1.0-beta.2 → 0.2.0-alpha.1

package/dist/core/verify/checklist.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"checklist.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/core/verify/checklist.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAwBG;AACH,OAAO,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,SAAS,CAAC;AACrC,OAAO,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,kBAAkB,CAAC;AAC5C,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,qBAAqB,CAAC;AACnD,OAAO,EAAa,MAAM,iBAAiB,CAAC;AAC5C,OAAO,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,eAAe,EAAE,MAAM,0BAA0B,CAAC;AAC3E,OAAO,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,2BAA2B,CAAC;AACxD,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,mBAAmB,CAAC;AAC7D,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,gBAAgB,EAAE,MAAM,kBAAkB,CAAC;AAClE,OAAO,EAAE,kBAAkB,EAAE,MAAM,2BAA2B,CAAC;AAC/D,OAAO,EAAE,mBAAmB,EAAE,MAAM,iBAAiB,CAAC;AACtD,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM,2BAA2B,CAAC;AACjE,OAAO,EAAE,YAAY,EAAE,MAAM,qBAAqB,CAAC;AACnD,OAAO,EAAE,iBAAiB,EAAE,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AACzD,OAAO,EAAE,gBAAgB,EAAE,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAExD,2EAA2E;AAC3E,uEAAuE;AACvE,4DAA4D;AAC5D,OAAO,EACL,eAAe,EACf,OAAO,EACP,aAAa,EACb,SAAS,GAEV,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AA4C9B;;;;GAIG;AACH,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,UAAU,gBAAgB,CACpC,OAAgB,EAChB,UAAsB,EACtB,SAAiB,EACjB,KAAoB;IAEpB,mEAAmE;IACnE,2EAA2E;IAC3E,0EAA0E;IAC1E,2EAA2E;IAC3E,wEAAwE;IACxE,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,KAAK,IAAI,IAAI,YAAY,EAAE,CAAC;IACxC,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,EAAkB,CAAC;IACvC,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,CAAC,IAAe,EAAE,OAAe,EAAE,KAAe,EAAE,IAAY,EAAS,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACzF,EAAE,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC;QACzC,IAAI;QACJ,OAAO;QACP,KAAK,EAAE,IAAI;KACZ,CAAC,CAAC;IAEH,MAAM,MAAM,GAAY,EAAE,CAAC;IAC3B,MAAM,OAAO,GAAY,EAAE,CAAC;IAC5B,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAY,EAAE,CAAC;IAC7B,MAAM,KAAK,GAAY,EAAE,CAAC;IAC1B,MAAM,SAAS,GAAY,EAAE,CAAC;IAE9B,MAAM,YAAY,GAAG,MAAM,mBAAmB,CAAC,UAAU,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IAEhE,2EAA2E;IAC3E,yEAAyE;IACzE,0EAA0E;IAC1E,qEAAqE;IACrE,6DAA6D;IAC7D,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,YAAY,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC;IACjD,IAAI,UAAU,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAC1B,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;QAC5C,0EAA0E;QAC1E,8EAA8E;QAC9E,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAC5B,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAW,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC;YACtC,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;gBACzB,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC;oBAAE,SAAS;gBAC1C,wEAAwE;gBACxE,sDAAsD;gBACtD,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,CAAC;oBAAE,SAAS;gBAC1E,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,cAAc,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;gBAC9B,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,gBAAgB,EAAE,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,YAAY,GAAG,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;YAC9E,CAAC;YACD,sEAAsE;YACtE,qEAAqE;YACrE,sEAAsE;YACtE,oEAAoE;YACpE,wEAAwE;YACxE,yEAAyE;YACzE,mEAAmE;YACnE,qEAAqE;YACrE,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,eAAe,CAC3B,QAAQ,EACR,IAAI,GAAG,CAAS,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,oBAAoB,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,YAAY,CAAC,CAAC,CAClF,CAAC;YACF,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,aAAa,EAAE,CAAC;gBAClC,wEAAwE;gBACxE,yDAAyD;gBACzD,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,KAAK,SAAS;oBAAE,SAAS;gBAChE,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;gBAC7B,MAAM,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;gBAC3B,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;oBACT,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,IAAI,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC;oBAChF,sEAAsE;oBACtE,sEAAsE;oBACtE,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE;iBACZ,CAAC,CAAC;YACL,CAAC;QACH,CAAC;IACH,CAAC;IAED,KAAK,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,YAAY,EAAE,CAAC;QAC/B,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,gBAAgB,CAAC,UAAU,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;QAEhD,2EAA2E;QAC3E,6EAA6E;QAC7E,0DAA0D;QAC1D,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,UAAU,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC;aAC9C,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;aACxC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACpC,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACvB,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,kBAAkB,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;YAClG,KAAK,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;gBACzB,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;oBAAE,SAAS;gBAC7B,OAAO,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;oBACX,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,aAAa,EAAE,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,GAAG,yBAAyB,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC;oBAC7E,SAAS,EAAE,EAAE;oBACb,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE;iBACV,CAAC,CAAC;YACL,CAAC;QACH,CAAC;QAED,qEAAqE;QACrE,wEAAwE;QACxE,wEAAwE;QACxE,0EAA0E;QAC1E,uEAAuE;QACvE,qDAAqD;QACrD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;QAClD,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACzD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,YAAY,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,kBAAkB,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;YAC1F,MAAM,UAAU,GAAG;gBACjB,EAAE,SAAS,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE;gBACtE,EAAE,SAAS,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,EAAE;aACzE,CAAC;YACX,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,UAAU,EAAE,CAAC;gBAC3B,KAAK,MAAM,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;oBAC1B,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;wBAAE,SAAS;oBAChC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;wBACZ,GAAG,KAAK,CACN,gBAAgB,EAChB,GAAG,EACH,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,EACxB,GAAG,GAAG,gBAAgB,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,aAAa,IAAI,GAAG,CACtD;wBACD,KAAK,EAAE,IAAI;qBACZ,CAAC,CAAC;gBACL,CAAC;YACH,CAAC;QACH,CAAC;QAED,6EAA6E;QAC7E,6EAA6E;QAC7E,8DAA8D;QAC9D,IAAI,UAAU,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAC3B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,iBAAiB,CAAC,MAAM,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;gBACtE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,MAAM,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS;oBAAE,SAAS;gBACxD,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;oBAC5B,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,gBAAgB,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC;oBAC5C,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;wBACb,GAAG,KAAK,CACN,iBAAiB,EACjB,GAAG,EACH,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,EACvD,aAAa,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,qBAAqB,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,GAAG,wBAAwB,CAChF;wBACD,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,aAAa,CAAC;qBACrC,CAAC,CAAC;gBACL,CAAC;YACH,CAAC;QACH,CAAC;QAED,4EAA4E;QAC5E,4EAA4E;QAC5E,0EAA0E;QAC1E,2EAA2E;QAC3E,2EAA2E;QAC3E,mEAAmE;QACnE,2EAA2E;QAC3E,sBAAsB;QACtB,IAAI,UAAU,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAC/B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,iBAAiB,CAAC,MAAM,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;gBAC1E,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,MAAM,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS;oBAAE,SAAS;gBACxD,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;oBAC5B,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,gBAAgB,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;oBACpD,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;wBACb,GAAG,KAAK,CACN,iBAAiB,EACjB,GAAG,EACH,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,EACvE,aAAa,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,0BAA0B,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,GAAG,sCAAsC,CACnG;wBACD,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,aAAa,CAAC;qBACrC,CAAC,CAAC;gBACL,CAAC;YACH,CAAC;QACH,CAAC;IACH,CAAC;IAED,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,MAAM,EAAE,GAAG,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,QAAQ,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,EAAE,GAAG,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5E,OAAO,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,SAAS,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,eAAe,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;AAC1F,CAAC","sourcesContent":["/**\n * The questions: what a feature's own artifacts promised, derived mechanically.\n *\n * The original plan was to extract C4 from the built code and diff it against\n * the delta. There is no such extractor and there will not be one — nothing\n * deterministic reads a service and says what its architecture MEANS, and two\n * generated models of the same code disagree in wording every run, so the diff\n * would flap and be switched off inside a week.\n *\n * What survives of the idea is the part that was always deterministic, and it\n * is this module: a feature says this service will exist, it will expose this\n * operation, that service will call it, this scenario will have a test. The\n * list comes from the same files `validate` already reads.\n *\n * The claim ids are a function of the claim and of nothing else — so two runs\n * are diffable, reordering the delta renames nothing, and rewording a scenario\n * DOES rename its claim, because an answer about text nobody wrote must not\n * carry over.\n *\n * `scenarioBodyHash` lives in `core/gherkin/digest.ts` — one recipe shared\n * with `core/gherkin/stamp.ts`, which stamps the same digest as a tag on every\n * generated scenario so `--results` can match a cucumber report back to a\n * claim. A second spelling of the hash would silently stop every scenario\n * claim from being answerable by a run.\n */\nimport { existsSync } from \"node:fs\";\nimport { readFile } from \"node:fs/promises\";\nimport { readAsyncapi } from \"../asyncapi/read.js\";\nimport { type Elem } from \"../c4/likec4.js\";\nimport { elementService, serviceResolver } from \"../c4/resolve/service.js\";\nimport { ACTOR_KINDS } from \"../vocabulary/maturity.js\";\nimport { operationIds, operations } from \"../openapi/doc.js\";\nimport { featurePaths, featureSpecPaths } from \"../repo/paths.js\";\nimport { locateServicePaths } from \"../repo/service-target.js\";\nimport { featureSpecServices } from \"../repo/repo.js\";\nimport { enumeratedServiceIds } from \"../repo/service-target.js\";\nimport { FleetContext } from \"../fleet-context.js\";\nimport { parseRequirements } from \"../document/parse.js\";\nimport { scenarioBodyHash } from \"../gherkin/digest.js\";\nimport type { DocsDir, FeatureDir } from \"../kernel/ids/dirs.js\";\n// The kind vocabulary and both hash recipes live in ./claims/identity.ts —\n// one module for everything that decides whether two runs ask the same\n// question, and this one for how the questions are derived.\nimport {\n  checklistDigest,\n  claimId,\n  DIGEST_LENGTH,\n  ID_LENGTH,\n  type ClaimKind,\n} from \"./claims/identity.js\";\n\nexport interface Claim {\n  /** `<kind>-<8 hex>` — stable for the life of the claim. See `claimId`. */\n  id: string;\n  kind: ClaimKind;\n  /** The service whose code answers this. A caller's claim is filed under the caller. */\n  subject: string;\n  /** The claim in one line, answerable without reading the feature's files. */\n  claim: string;\n  /**\n   * `scenario.tested` only: the first {@link DIGEST_LENGTH} hex of the\n   * scenario's body hash — the exact digest `loam gherkin` stamps as\n   * `@loam-digest-…`, which is what a cucumber report scenario carries and\n   * what `--results` matches on. Absent on every other kind.\n   */\n  digest?: string;\n  /**\n   * `api.exposes` only: the operationId the claim asserts, structurally — the\n   * join key `--contract-results` matches a contract report's entries on,\n   * exactly as `digest` is `--results`'s. Never parsed back out of the claim\n   * text, which is prose and may be reworded. Absent on every other kind.\n   */\n  operation?: string;\n  /**\n   * The literal string the claim asserts of the cited artifact — the\n   * operationId for `api.exposes`, the message name for `event.declares`, the\n   * edge's op for `c4.calls` — carried structurally so evidence pins\n   * (`./pins/pin.ts`) can stamp it at record time and the read side never\n   * parses it back out of claim prose. A separate field from `operation` on\n   * purpose: `contestedOperations` filters on `operation !== undefined` and\n   * must not start seeing `c4.calls` claims. Absent where a claim asserts no\n   * literal (`service.exists`, `scenario.tested`).\n   */\n  token?: string;\n}\n\nexport interface Checklist {\n  feature: string;\n  claims: Claim[];\n  /** A digest of the claim id SET — what says a record still answers this feature. */\n  digest: string;\n}\n\n/**\n * Derive the checklist from a feature's own artifacts. No code is read here and\n * none should be: the whole design rests on the questions being computed from\n * documents that do not change between runs.\n */\nexport async function featureChecklist(\n  docsDir: DocsDir,\n  featureDir: FeatureDir,\n  featureId: string,\n  fleet?: FleetContext,\n): Promise<Checklist> {\n  // The per-service loop below resolves living contracts through the\n  // enumeration twice per service; without a shared context each of those is\n  // a full fleet walk, so deriving one checklist cost O(services²) reads. A\n  // caller-supplied context is used when given; otherwise one is created for\n  // this derivation alone — the loop still pays a single walk either way.\n  const ctx = fleet ?? new FleetContext();\n  const seen = new Map<string, number>();\n  const claim = (kind: ClaimKind, subject: string, parts: string[], text: string): Claim => ({\n    id: claimId(featureId, kind, parts, seen),\n    kind,\n    subject,\n    claim: text,\n  });\n\n  const exists: Claim[] = [];\n  const exposes: Claim[] = [];\n  const declares: Claim[] = [];\n  const calls: Claim[] = [];\n  const scenarios: Claim[] = [];\n\n  const specServices = await featureSpecServices(featureDir, ctx);\n\n  // Architecture — what the delta promised the fleet would look like. Loaded\n  // through the context rather than a bare parse, so a caller that derives\n  // several checklists in one invocation (`loam gate`'s verification check,\n  // the fleet forms) shares one parse per delta — and a batch prefetch\n  // (`FleetContext.prefetchLikeC4`) genuinely seeds this load.\n  const deltaPath = featurePaths(featureDir).delta;\n  if (existsSync(deltaPath)) {\n    const res = await ctx.loadLikeC4(deltaPath);\n    // A delta nobody can parse promises nothing checkable. `validate` already\n    // reports it; inventing claims out of a broken document would only add noise.\n    if (res.errors.length === 0) {\n      const elements: Elem[] = res.elements;\n      for (const e of elements) {\n        if (!e.tags.includes(featureId)) continue;\n        // A dotted id is a container INSIDE a service, and an actor is nobody's\n        // repository. Neither is a service that has to exist.\n        if (e.id.includes(\".\") || ACTOR_KINDS.has(e.kind.toLowerCase())) continue;\n        const svc = elementService(e);\n        exists.push(claim(\"service.exists\", svc, [svc], `service '${svc}' exists`));\n      }\n      // The enumerated fleet — `services/` plus this feature's own `specs/`\n      // directories, the only place a service the feature INTRODUCES has a\n      // directory at all — rides into the resolver so a claim about an edge\n      // drawn into a modelled container names the service that owns it. A\n      // claim against a service called \"api\" that has never existed is one no\n      // evidence in any repository could ever answer, and the fleet half alone\n      // still derived exactly that claim for an introduced service's own\n      // container. Unenumerable services/ degrades to the feature's names.\n      const svcOf = serviceResolver(\n        elements,\n        new Set<string>([...(await enumeratedServiceIds(docsDir, ctx)), ...specServices]),\n      );\n      for (const r of res.relationships) {\n        // Untagged edges are context for the diagram; an edge with no operation\n        // names nothing specific enough to look for in the code.\n        if (!r.tags.includes(featureId) || r.op === undefined) continue;\n        const from = svcOf(r.source);\n        const to = svcOf(r.target);\n        calls.push({\n          ...claim(\"c4.calls\", from, [from, to, r.op], `${from} calls '${r.op}' on ${to}`),\n          // The same string as the provider's api.exposes token, scanned in the\n          // CALLER's cited file — a call site plausibly spells the operationId.\n          token: r.op,\n        });\n      }\n    }\n  }\n\n  for (const svc of specServices) {\n    const paths = featureSpecPaths(featureDir, svc);\n\n    // Contract — only what is NEW. A delta's openapi.yaml is a whole document,\n    // not a patch, so authors restate the living API inside it; asking whether a\n    // service still exposes what it already exposed is noise.\n    const featOps = (await operations(paths.openapi))\n      .filter((operation) => !operation.remove)\n      .map((operation) => operation.id);\n    if (featOps.length > 0) {\n      const living = new Set(await operationIds((await locateServicePaths(docsDir, svc, ctx)).openapi));\n      for (const op of featOps) {\n        if (living.has(op)) continue;\n        exposes.push({\n          ...claim(\"api.exposes\", svc, [svc, op], `${svc} exposes operationId '${op}'`),\n          operation: op,\n          token: op,\n        });\n      }\n    }\n\n    // Events — the same NEW-only discipline on the async axis: a delta's\n    // asyncapi.yaml is a complete document too, so what the living contract\n    // already sends or receives is restatement, not a promise. Removals are\n    // not questions either — the reader already keeps marked declarations out\n    // of the sent/received sets — and an unreadable delta promises nothing\n    // checkable, exactly like the broken C4 delta above.\n    const events = await readAsyncapi(paths.asyncapi);\n    if (events.sent.length > 0 || events.received.length > 0) {\n      const living = await readAsyncapi((await locateServicePaths(docsDir, svc, ctx)).asyncapi);\n      const directions = [\n        { direction: \"sends\", feat: events.sent, known: new Set(living.sent) },\n        { direction: \"receives\", feat: events.received, known: new Set(living.received) },\n      ] as const;\n      for (const d of directions) {\n        for (const name of d.feat) {\n          if (d.known.has(name)) continue;\n          declares.push({\n            ...claim(\n              \"event.declares\",\n              svc,\n              [svc, d.direction, name],\n              `${svc} declares it ${d.direction} message '${name}'`,\n            ),\n            token: name,\n          });\n        }\n      }\n    }\n\n    // Behaviour — the scenarios of the requirements this feature CHANGES. A BASE\n    // requirement is the living state quoted inside the delta, and a REMOVED one\n    // is being retired: neither is work anybody has to have done.\n    if (existsSync(paths.spec)) {\n      for (const r of parseRequirements(await readFile(paths.spec, \"utf8\"))) {\n        if (r.kind === \"BASE\" || r.kind === \"REMOVED\") continue;\n        for (const s of r.scenarios) {\n          const body = scenarioBodyHash(svc, s.lines);\n          scenarios.push({\n            ...claim(\n              \"scenario.tested\",\n              svc,\n              [svc, r.id ?? r.name, s.name, body.slice(0, ID_LENGTH)],\n              `scenario '${s.name}' of requirement '${r.name}' (${svc}) is covered by a test`,\n            ),\n            digest: body.slice(0, DIGEST_LENGTH),\n          });\n        }\n      }\n    }\n\n    // The architecture spec axis, same walk: an arch scenario is a promise like\n    // any other — the outbox test nobody was going to write IS the point of the\n    // axis. The source file rides in the id tuple AND in the body hash itself\n    // (two axes are two namespaces: identically-worded scenarios must stay two\n    // questions, and the axis-salted digest is what keeps a business-only test\n    // run from answering the arch claim) and in the claim text, so the\n    // answering agent knows it is being asked for an integration/ops test, not\n    // an acceptance test.\n    if (existsSync(paths.archSpec)) {\n      for (const r of parseRequirements(await readFile(paths.archSpec, \"utf8\"))) {\n        if (r.kind === \"BASE\" || r.kind === \"REMOVED\") continue;\n        for (const s of r.scenarios) {\n          const body = scenarioBodyHash(svc, s.lines, \"arch\");\n          scenarios.push({\n            ...claim(\n              \"scenario.tested\",\n              svc,\n              [svc, \"arch.spec.md\", r.id ?? r.name, s.name, body.slice(0, ID_LENGTH)],\n              `scenario '${s.name}' of arch requirement '${r.name}' (${svc}, arch.spec.md) is covered by a test`,\n            ),\n            digest: body.slice(0, DIGEST_LENGTH),\n          });\n        }\n      }\n    }\n  }\n\n  const claims = [...exists, ...exposes, ...declares, ...calls, ...scenarios];\n  return { feature: featureId, claims, digest: checklistDigest(claims.map((c) => c.id)) };\n}\n"]}

package/dist/core/verify/claims/identity.js

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+/**
+ * What a claim is about, and what makes it the same claim next run: the kind
+ * vocabulary and the two hash recipes. Moved out of `../checklist.ts` when the
+ * `operation` join key pushed the derivation module over the line limit — the
+ * seam was already in that file's own header, which discusses what a claim's
+ * id is a function of apart from how the questions are derived. The kinds live
+ * beside the id recipe rather than beside the derivation because the id STARTS
+ * with the kind: the two are one identity, and a diff to this module is a diff
+ * to every record in the fleet, which is exactly why it holds nothing else.
+ */
+import { createHash } from "node:crypto";
+/**
+ * What a claim is about. The order is the order the checklist comes back in,
+ * and it reads as the story of the feature: the service exists, it exposes its
+ * operations, it declares its messages, the calls into it are wired, the
+ * behaviour is tested.
+ */
+export const CLAIM_KINDS = ["service.exists", "api.exposes", "event.declares", "c4.calls", "scenario.tested"];
+/**
+ * How much of the sha256 goes into an id, and into a digest — the checklist's,
+ * and a scenario claim's runner-matching one, which is deliberately the same
+ * 16 hex `loam gherkin` stamps (its GHERKIN_DIGEST_LENGTH): the tag in a
+ * cucumber report and the digest on a claim must be the same string.
+ */
+export const ID_LENGTH = 8;
+export const DIGEST_LENGTH = 16;
+/**
+ * A claim's identity: a hash of what it says, and nothing about how it was
+ * produced.
+ *
+ * The feature id is part of it so an answers file for one feature can never
+ * validate against another. Two claims that really are identical (the same
+ * scenario name twice under one requirement) are distinguished by occurrence, in
+ * document order — they are still two questions, and answering one must not
+ * answer the other.
+ *
+ * The hash is short because the claim text sits next to it everywhere it is
+ * shown; it identifies a question, it does not authenticate one.
+ */
+export function claimId(featureId, kind, parts, seen) {
+    // NUL-joined so no claim's own text can spell another claim's tuple by
+    // containing the separator: ['a b','c'] and ['a','b c'] stay two questions.
+    const tuple = [featureId, kind, ...parts].join("\u0000");
+    const n = (seen.get(tuple) ?? 0) + 1;
+    seen.set(tuple, n);
+    const canonical = n === 1 ? tuple : `${tuple}\u0000#${n}`;
+    return `${kind}-${createHash("sha256").update(canonical).digest("hex").slice(0, ID_LENGTH)}`;
+}
+/**
+ * A digest of the claim id SET — sorted, so reordering the artifacts does not
+ * make a record look stale. It changes when a claim is added, removed or
+ * reworded, which is exactly when an answer set stops describing the feature.
+ * Takes the ids rather than the claims so this module never has to import the
+ * `Claim` shape the derivation declares — the recipe is over ids and nothing
+ * else, and the signature now says so.
+ */
+export function checklistDigest(ids) {
+    const sorted = [...ids].sort();
+    return createHash("sha256").update(sorted.join("\n")).digest("hex").slice(0, DIGEST_LENGTH);
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=identity.js.map

package/dist/core/verify/claims/identity.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"identity.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../src/core/verify/claims/identity.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;GASG;AACH,OAAO,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAEzC;;;;;GAKG;AACH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,CAAC,gBAAgB,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,gBAAgB,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,iBAAiB,CAAU,CAAC;AAGvH;;;;;GAKG;AACH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;AAC3B,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC;AAEhC;;;;;;;;;;;;GAYG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,OAAO,CACrB,SAAiB,EACjB,IAAe,EACf,KAAe,EACf,IAAyB;IAEzB,uEAAuE;IACvE,4EAA4E;IAC5E,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;IACzD,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IACrC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACnB,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,KAAK,UAAU,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IAC1D,OAAO,GAAG,IAAI,IAAI,UAAU,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;AAC/F,CAAC;AAED;;;;;;;GAOG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,eAAe,CAAC,GAAsB;IACpD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;IAC/B,OAAO,UAAU,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,aAAa,CAAC,CAAC;AAC9F,CAAC","sourcesContent":["/**\n * What a claim is about, and what makes it the same claim next run: the kind\n * vocabulary and the two hash recipes. Moved out of `../checklist.ts` when the\n * `operation` join key pushed the derivation module over the line limit — the\n * seam was already in that file's own header, which discusses what a claim's\n * id is a function of apart from how the questions are derived. The kinds live\n * beside the id recipe rather than beside the derivation because the id STARTS\n * with the kind: the two are one identity, and a diff to this module is a diff\n * to every record in the fleet, which is exactly why it holds nothing else.\n */\nimport { createHash } from \"node:crypto\";\n\n/**\n * What a claim is about. The order is the order the checklist comes back in,\n * and it reads as the story of the feature: the service exists, it exposes its\n * operations, it declares its messages, the calls into it are wired, the\n * behaviour is tested.\n */\nexport const CLAIM_KINDS = [\"service.exists\", \"api.exposes\", \"event.declares\", \"c4.calls\", \"scenario.tested\"] as const;\nexport type ClaimKind = (typeof CLAIM_KINDS)[number];\n\n/**\n * How much of the sha256 goes into an id, and into a digest — the checklist's,\n * and a scenario claim's runner-matching one, which is deliberately the same\n * 16 hex `loam gherkin` stamps (its GHERKIN_DIGEST_LENGTH): the tag in a\n * cucumber report and the digest on a claim must be the same string.\n */\nexport const ID_LENGTH = 8;\nexport const DIGEST_LENGTH = 16;\n\n/**\n * A claim's identity: a hash of what it says, and nothing about how it was\n * produced.\n *\n * The feature id is part of it so an answers file for one feature can never\n * validate against another. Two claims that really are identical (the same\n * scenario name twice under one requirement) are distinguished by occurrence, in\n * document order — they are still two questions, and answering one must not\n * answer the other.\n *\n * The hash is short because the claim text sits next to it everywhere it is\n * shown; it identifies a question, it does not authenticate one.\n */\nexport function claimId(\n  featureId: string,\n  kind: ClaimKind,\n  parts: string[],\n  seen: Map<string, number>,\n): string {\n  // NUL-joined so no claim's own text can spell another claim's tuple by\n  // containing the separator: ['a b','c'] and ['a','b c'] stay two questions.\n  const tuple = [featureId, kind, ...parts].join(\"\\u0000\");\n  const n = (seen.get(tuple) ?? 0) + 1;\n  seen.set(tuple, n);\n  const canonical = n === 1 ? tuple : `${tuple}\\u0000#${n}`;\n  return `${kind}-${createHash(\"sha256\").update(canonical).digest(\"hex\").slice(0, ID_LENGTH)}`;\n}\n\n/**\n * A digest of the claim id SET — sorted, so reordering the artifacts does not\n * make a record look stale. It changes when a claim is added, removed or\n * reworded, which is exactly when an answer set stops describing the feature.\n * Takes the ids rather than the claims so this module never has to import the\n * `Claim` shape the derivation declares — the recipe is over ids and nothing\n * else, and the signature now says so.\n */\nexport function checklistDigest(ids: readonly string[]): string {\n  const sorted = [...ids].sort();\n  return createHash(\"sha256\").update(sorted.join(\"\\n\")).digest(\"hex\").slice(0, DIGEST_LENGTH);\n}\n"]}

package/dist/core/verify/cross/diff.js

@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/**
+ * The FILE a piece of evidence cites: one trailing `:<line>` or
+ * `:<line>-<line>` suffix stripped, nothing else judged. Mechanical string
+ * surgery on purpose — evidence is prose the answerer wrote, and any deeper
+ * reading (resolving against a tree, normalizing separators) would turn the
+ * disjointness signal into an opinion about paths instead of a fact about
+ * citations.
+ */
+function citedFile(evidence) {
+    return evidence.replace(/:\d+(-\d+)?$/, "");
+}
+function side(answer) {
+    return {
+        verdict: answer.verdict,
+        evidence: answer.evidence,
+        ...(answer.note === undefined ? {} : { note: answer.note }),
+    };
+}
+function crossRow(claim, a, b) {
+    const base = {
+        id: claim.id,
+        kind: claim.kind,
+        subject: claim.subject,
+        claim: claim.claim,
+        a: side(a),
+        b: side(b),
+    };
+    if (a.verdict !== b.verdict)
+        return { ...base, code: "cross.disagree" };
+    if (a.verdict === "confirmed") {
+        // Both confirmed, so both cite at least one entry (`checkAnswers` refuses
+        // an evidenced-nothing confirmation) — disjoint therefore means "looked in
+        // different places and agreed anyway", never "nobody cited anything".
+        const files = new Set(a.evidence.map(citedFile));
+        const disjoint = !b.evidence.some((entry) => files.has(citedFile(entry)));
+        return { ...base, code: "cross.agree-confirmed", ...(disjoint ? { evidenceDisjoint: true } : {}) };
+    }
+    return { ...base, code: "cross.agree-unconfirmed" };
+}
+/**
+ * Join two validated answer sets over the claims they both answered.
+ *
+ * Both sets must have come out of `checkAnswers` over THIS `claims` array,
+ * which refuses any set that does not answer every claim exactly once — so
+ * there is deliberately no missing-answer branch in the result shape. The
+ * guard below still fails closed on a caller that skipped validation: a
+ * silent skip would report "no disagreement" about a claim nobody compared,
+ * which is the one lie this module exists to prevent.
+ */
+export function crossExamine(claims, a, b) {
+    const byIdA = new Map(a.map((answer) => [answer.id, answer]));
+    const byIdB = new Map(b.map((answer) => [answer.id, answer]));
+    const rows = claims.map((claim) => {
+        const answerA = byIdA.get(claim.id);
+        const answerB = byIdB.get(claim.id);
+        if (answerA === undefined || answerB === undefined) {
+            throw new Error(`crossExamine: claim ${claim.id} has no answer in the ${answerA === undefined ? "first" : "second"} set — ` +
+                "validate both sets with checkAnswers over the same claims before joining them");
+        }
+        return crossRow(claim, answerA, answerB);
+    });
+    const of = (code) => rows.filter((row) => row.code === code).length;
+    const disagreements = rows.filter((row) => row.code === "cross.disagree");
+    return {
+        rows,
+        summary: {
+            claims: rows.length,
+            agreeConfirmed: of("cross.agree-confirmed"),
+            agreeUnconfirmed: of("cross.agree-unconfirmed"),
+            disagree: disagreements.length,
+            evidenceDisjoint: rows.filter((row) => row.code === "cross.agree-confirmed" && row.evidenceDisjoint === true)
+                .length,
+        },
+        disagreements,
+    };
+}
+/**
+ * The one notice this lens raises: agreements whose cited file sets share no
+ * path. Second in the reading order after the disagreements, because it is
+ * the shape correlated agreement takes when both agents guessed — each found
+ * something plausible somewhere, and nothing says they found the same thing.
+ */
+export function disjointNotice(rows) {
+    const ids = rows
+        .filter((row) => row.code === "cross.agree-confirmed" && row.evidenceDisjoint === true)
+        .map((row) => row.id);
+    if (ids.length === 0)
+        return null;
+    return {
+        code: "cross.evidence-disjoint",
+        severity: "warn",
+        message: `${ids.length} agreed-confirmed claim(s) cite non-overlapping files: ${ids.join(", ")}. ` +
+            "Two agents agreeing from different evidence is the second thing to read, after the disagreements.",
+        claims: ids,
+    };
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=diff.js.map

package/dist/core/verify/cross/diff.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"diff.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../src/core/verify/cross/diff.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAyEA;;;;;;;GAOG;AACH,SAAS,SAAS,CAAC,QAAgB;IACjC,OAAO,QAAQ,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,cAAc,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;AAC9C,CAAC;AAED,SAAS,IAAI,CAAC,MAAc;IAC1B,OAAO;QACL,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO;QACvB,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,QAAQ;QACzB,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;KAC5D,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC;AAED,SAAS,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAY,EAAE,CAAS,EAAE,CAAS;IAClD,MAAM,IAAI,GAAc;QACtB,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE;QACZ,IAAI,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI;QAChB,OAAO,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO;QACtB,KAAK,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK;QAClB,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QACV,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;KACX,CAAC;IACF,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO;QAAE,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,gBAAgB,EAAE,CAAC;IACxE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,WAAW,EAAE,CAAC;QAC9B,0EAA0E;QAC1E,2EAA2E;QAC3E,sEAAsE;QACtE,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QACjD,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QAC1E,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,uBAAuB,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,gBAAgB,EAAE,IAAa,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IAC9G,CAAC;IACD,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,yBAAyB,EAAE,CAAC;AACtD,CAAC;AAED;;;;;;;;;GASG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,YAAY,CAAC,MAAe,EAAE,CAAW,EAAE,CAAW;IACpE,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAC9D,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAC9D,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE;QAChC,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACpC,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACpC,IAAI,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,IAAI,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;YACnD,MAAM,IAAI,KAAK,CACb,uBAAuB,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,yBAAyB,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,SAAS;gBACzG,+EAA+E,CAClF,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;QACD,OAAO,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC;IAC3C,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACH,MAAM,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,IAAe,EAAU,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;IACvF,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,gBAAgB,CAAC,CAAC;IAC1E,OAAO;QACL,IAAI;QACJ,OAAO,EAAE;YACP,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM;YACnB,cAAc,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,uBAAuB,CAAC;YAC3C,gBAAgB,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,yBAAyB,CAAC;YAC/C,QAAQ,EAAE,aAAa,CAAC,MAAM;YAC9B,gBAAgB,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,uBAAuB,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,gBAAgB,KAAK,IAAI,CAAC;iBAC1G,MAAM;SACV;QACD,aAAa;KACd,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC;AAED;;;;;GAKG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,cAAc,CAAC,IAA2B;IACxD,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,IAAI;SACb,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,uBAAuB,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,gBAAgB,KAAK,IAAI,CAAC;SACtF,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACxB,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC;QAAE,OAAO,IAAI,CAAC;IAClC,OAAO;QACL,IAAI,EAAE,yBAAyB;QAC/B,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM;QAChB,OAAO,EACL,GAAG,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,0DAA0D,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI;YACzF,mGAAmG;QACrG,MAAM,EAAE,GAAG;KACZ,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC","sourcesContent":["/**\n * Mechanical cross-examination of two blind answer sets over one checklist.\n *\n * The doctrine lives here because every surface reads it from this module:\n * agreement is a review-ranking signal, never a verdict. The two sets almost\n * always come from two contexts of the same model, so their agreeing is\n * correlated evidence — which is why this module deliberately imports nothing\n * from `../record.ts`'s verdict machinery (`verificationVerdict`,\n * `tallyRecord`): a cross-examination has no `verified`, no `attested`, and\n * can never upgrade either. What it ranks is where a human reads first — the\n * disagreements, then the agreements whose cited files do not overlap.\n *\n * The join is by claim id ONLY. The ids are deterministic functions of the\n * claims (`../claims/identity.ts`), which is the whole mechanism: two agents\n * who never saw each other's work still answered the same question under the\n * same key, so their answers are mechanically joinable — where fuzzy-matching\n * claim TEXT would make \"the same question\" an opinion about wording.\n */\nimport type { Answer, Verdict } from \"../answers.js\";\nimport type { Claim } from \"../checklist.js\";\nimport type { ClaimKind } from \"../claims/identity.js\";\nimport type { VerifyNotice } from \"../record.js\";\n\n/**\n * One side's answer, as the cross-examination reports it. Deliberately\n * narrower than {@link Answer}: `answered_by` is always `agent` under a diff\n * (both sets validate through `checkAnswers`' agent path, no report in\n * sight), and `evidence_pins` never rides through — a pin is loam's own\n * stamp, absent from `checkAnswers`' output by construction, and a diff of\n * caller-written files must not launder one into a payload.\n */\nexport interface CrossAnswer {\n  verdict: Verdict;\n  evidence: string[];\n  note?: string;\n}\n\ninterface CrossBase {\n  id: string;\n  kind: ClaimKind;\n  subject: string;\n  claim: string;\n  a: CrossAnswer;\n  b: CrossAnswer;\n}\n\n/**\n * One claim, both answers, and what their comparison is. A union rather than\n * an optional-field record so `evidenceDisjoint` is not constructible on the\n * arms it means nothing for: two agents disagreeing cite different things by\n * definition, and two unconfirmed answers cite nothing.\n */\nexport type CrossClaim =\n  | (CrossBase & { code: \"cross.agree-confirmed\"; evidenceDisjoint?: true })\n  | (CrossBase & { code: \"cross.agree-unconfirmed\" })\n  | (CrossBase & { code: \"cross.disagree\" });\n\nexport type CrossCode = CrossClaim[\"code\"];\n\nexport interface CrossExamination {\n  /** Checklist order — the order the questions were asked, whatever either agent did. */\n  rows: CrossClaim[];\n  summary: {\n    claims: number;\n    agreeConfirmed: number;\n    agreeUnconfirmed: number;\n    disagree: number;\n    evidenceDisjoint: number;\n  };\n  /** The `cross.disagree` rows again, first-class: they are what a reader is for. */\n  disagreements: CrossClaim[];\n}\n\n/**\n * The FILE a piece of evidence cites: one trailing `:<line>` or\n * `:<line>-<line>` suffix stripped, nothing else judged. Mechanical string\n * surgery on purpose — evidence is prose the answerer wrote, and any deeper\n * reading (resolving against a tree, normalizing separators) would turn the\n * disjointness signal into an opinion about paths instead of a fact about\n * citations.\n */\nfunction citedFile(evidence: string): string {\n  return evidence.replace(/:\\d+(-\\d+)?$/, \"\");\n}\n\nfunction side(answer: Answer): CrossAnswer {\n  return {\n    verdict: answer.verdict,\n    evidence: answer.evidence,\n    ...(answer.note === undefined ? {} : { note: answer.note }),\n  };\n}\n\nfunction crossRow(claim: Claim, a: Answer, b: Answer): CrossClaim {\n  const base: CrossBase = {\n    id: claim.id,\n    kind: claim.kind,\n    subject: claim.subject,\n    claim: claim.claim,\n    a: side(a),\n    b: side(b),\n  };\n  if (a.verdict !== b.verdict) return { ...base, code: \"cross.disagree\" };\n  if (a.verdict === \"confirmed\") {\n    // Both confirmed, so both cite at least one entry (`checkAnswers` refuses\n    // an evidenced-nothing confirmation) — disjoint therefore means \"looked in\n    // different places and agreed anyway\", never \"nobody cited anything\".\n    const files = new Set(a.evidence.map(citedFile));\n    const disjoint = !b.evidence.some((entry) => files.has(citedFile(entry)));\n    return { ...base, code: \"cross.agree-confirmed\", ...(disjoint ? { evidenceDisjoint: true as const } : {}) };\n  }\n  return { ...base, code: \"cross.agree-unconfirmed\" };\n}\n\n/**\n * Join two validated answer sets over the claims they both answered.\n *\n * Both sets must have come out of `checkAnswers` over THIS `claims` array,\n * which refuses any set that does not answer every claim exactly once — so\n * there is deliberately no missing-answer branch in the result shape. The\n * guard below still fails closed on a caller that skipped validation: a\n * silent skip would report \"no disagreement\" about a claim nobody compared,\n * which is the one lie this module exists to prevent.\n */\nexport function crossExamine(claims: Claim[], a: Answer[], b: Answer[]): CrossExamination {\n  const byIdA = new Map(a.map((answer) => [answer.id, answer]));\n  const byIdB = new Map(b.map((answer) => [answer.id, answer]));\n  const rows = claims.map((claim) => {\n    const answerA = byIdA.get(claim.id);\n    const answerB = byIdB.get(claim.id);\n    if (answerA === undefined || answerB === undefined) {\n      throw new Error(\n        `crossExamine: claim ${claim.id} has no answer in the ${answerA === undefined ? \"first\" : \"second\"} set — ` +\n          \"validate both sets with checkAnswers over the same claims before joining them\",\n      );\n    }\n    return crossRow(claim, answerA, answerB);\n  });\n  const of = (code: CrossCode): number => rows.filter((row) => row.code === code).length;\n  const disagreements = rows.filter((row) => row.code === \"cross.disagree\");\n  return {\n    rows,\n    summary: {\n      claims: rows.length,\n      agreeConfirmed: of(\"cross.agree-confirmed\"),\n      agreeUnconfirmed: of(\"cross.agree-unconfirmed\"),\n      disagree: disagreements.length,\n      evidenceDisjoint: rows.filter((row) => row.code === \"cross.agree-confirmed\" && row.evidenceDisjoint === true)\n        .length,\n    },\n    disagreements,\n  };\n}\n\n/**\n * The one notice this lens raises: agreements whose cited file sets share no\n * path. Second in the reading order after the disagreements, because it is\n * the shape correlated agreement takes when both agents guessed — each found\n * something plausible somewhere, and nothing says they found the same thing.\n */\nexport function disjointNotice(rows: readonly CrossClaim[]): VerifyNotice | null {\n  const ids = rows\n    .filter((row) => row.code === \"cross.agree-confirmed\" && row.evidenceDisjoint === true)\n    .map((row) => row.id);\n  if (ids.length === 0) return null;\n  return {\n    code: \"cross.evidence-disjoint\",\n    severity: \"warn\",\n    message:\n      `${ids.length} agreed-confirmed claim(s) cite non-overlapping files: ${ids.join(\", \")}. ` +\n      \"Two agents agreeing from different evidence is the second thing to read, after the disagreements.\",\n    claims: ids,\n  };\n}\n"]}

package/dist/core/verify/evidence/contract.js

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+/**
+ * `loam verify --contract-results` — an API contract-test report as the answer
+ * sheet for `api.exposes` claims.
+ *
+ * The accepted shape is loam's own documented one (SCHEMA.md, "Contract-test
+ * reports"): `{"loamContractReport": 1, "results": [{"operationId": "…",
+ * "status": "passed"}]}`. It is deliberately a shape tools EMIT INTO rather
+ * than a vendor format loam parses, because no surveyed vendor format carries
+ * both halves of what confirming needs — an unambiguous executed-AND-passed
+ * status and a deterministic operation join key. Specmatic's JSON coverage
+ * report was the v1 candidate and is declined by name: its `coverageStatus:
+ * "covered"` means exercised, not passed (a red run still writes "covered"),
+ * so an adapter over it would confirm exactly what a failing suite refuted.
+ *
+ * The operationId is the ONLY identity, matched against the structured
+ * `operation` a claim carries (`../checklist.ts`). It is half an identity, and
+ * the design leans on the missing half being supplied by scope: an operationId
+ * is unique within ONE contract document, not across a fleet, and a report
+ * entry names no service — so when more than one service on the handed-in
+ * checklist exposes the same operationId, the claims are refused rather than
+ * answered ({@link contestedOperations}), and `--service` is what gives a
+ * contract report an owner, exactly as it is for a contested scenario digest.
+ * Within one service's claims the match is exact, and renaming an operation
+ * renames its claim, so rewording cannot carry an answer over. Names and free
+ * text match nothing.
+ *
+ * Parsing is strict where the cucumber reader is tolerant, and the asymmetry
+ * is deliberate: a cucumber report is another tool's file full of legitimate
+ * entries loam has no business judging, while this shape exists for exactly
+ * one purpose, so an entry that cannot be matched is a malformed report, not
+ * scenery. A file that is recognizably not this shape refuses rather than
+ * quietly answering every claim "not exercised" — an unparseable report never
+ * silently answers zero claims as if none matched.
+ */
+import { isRecord } from "../../kernel/records.js";
+import {} from "../answers.js";
+import {} from "../checklist.js";
+/** The marker key that makes a JSON document this shape, and the version this loam reads. */
+export const CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER = "loamContractReport";
+export const CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION = 1;
+/**
+ * Read a parsed JSON document down to its runs. `reportName` is how the caller
+ * spelled the file, for the refusal message; core never prints, so a refusal
+ * is data for the command to fail with (`answers-unreadable`).
+ */
+export function readContractReport(doc, reportName) {
+    const shape = `{"${CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER}": ${CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION}, "results": [{"operationId": "…", "status": "passed"}]}`;
+    if (!isRecord(doc) || !(CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER in doc)) {
+        return {
+            ok: false,
+            message: `${reportName} is not a contract-results report — expected loam's generic shape ${shape} ` +
+                "(see SCHEMA.md's contract-test reports section; Specmatic, Pact, Dredd and property harnesses emit it with a one-line transform).",
+        };
+    }
+    if (doc[CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER] !== CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION) {
+        // A later version may redefine what an entry means; reading it with this
+        // parser could confirm something the report never said. Fail closed.
+        return {
+            ok: false,
+            message: `${reportName} declares ${CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER}: ${JSON.stringify(doc[CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER])} — ` +
+                `this loam reads version ${CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION} only.`,
+        };
+    }
+    const results = doc["results"];
+    if (!Array.isArray(results)) {
+        return { ok: false, message: `${reportName} has no \`results\` array — expected ${shape}.` };
+    }
+    const runs = [];
+    for (const [i, entry] of results.entries()) {
+        const where = `${reportName} entry ${i + 1}`;
+        if (!isRecord(entry))
+            return { ok: false, message: `${where} is not an object — expected ${shape}.` };
+        const operationId = entry["operationId"];
+        if (typeof operationId !== "string" || operationId.length === 0) {
+            return { ok: false, message: `${where} has no operationId — every entry must name the operation it exercised.` };
+        }
+        const status = entry["status"];
+        if (typeof status !== "string" || status.length === 0) {
+            return {
+                ok: false,
+                message: `${where} ('${operationId}') has no status — expected "passed", "failed", or the tool's own word for anything else.`,
+            };
+        }
+        const test = entry["test"];
+        runs.push({
+            operationId,
+            status,
+            ...(typeof test === "string" && test.trim().length > 0 ? { test: test.trim() } : {}),
+        });
+    }
+    return { ok: true, runs };
+}
+/**
+ * The operationIds that more than one service on this checklist exposes, with
+ * the services that expose them — `contestedDigests`' (core/results.ts) exact
+ * shape, for this axis's join key.
+ *
+ * An operationId is unique within one contract document, not across a fleet:
+ * two services may each expose a 'createSplit', and a report entry carries no
+ * service half, so a single contract report matches both services' claims and
+ * cannot say whose suite it describes. The all-at-once form once confirmed a
+ * service from a suite that never touched it exactly this way. loam does not
+ * choose: those claims are refused rather than answered, and `--service` is
+ * what gives a report an owner — it narrows the checklist to one subject
+ * before the matching starts, so nothing handed in here is contested.
+ */
+export function contestedOperations(claims) {
+    const owners = new Map();
+    for (const c of claims) {
+        if (c.operation === undefined)
+            continue;
+        const seen = owners.get(c.operation) ?? new Set();
+        seen.add(c.subject);
+        owners.set(c.operation, seen);
+    }
+    const contested = new Map();
+    for (const [operation, services] of owners) {
+        if (services.size > 1)
+            contested.set(operation, [...services].sort());
+    }
+    return contested;
+}
+/**
+ * Answer every claim from the report — the contract runner's half of the
+ * record. Total over the claims handed in, like `runnerAnswers`: a claim the
+ * report does not exercise is answered `unconfirmed`, never skipped, because
+ * silence must never read as checked. Report entries matching no claim are
+ * skipped silently — a real contract suite exercises the whole living API,
+ * and the claims only ever cover what the feature ADDS.
+ *
+ * Confirmation is strict on purpose: every matching entry (an operationId the
+ * report holds twice is two test cases, and all of them count) has status
+ * exactly `"passed"`. One non-passed entry wins as failure, and an unknown
+ * status is named in the note rather than rounded to either verdict. An
+ * operationId two services expose is refused before any of that: see
+ * {@link contestedOperations}.
+ */
+export function contractAnswers(claims, runs, reportName) {
+    const contested = contestedOperations(claims);
+    return claims.map((c) => {
+        const rivals = c.operation === undefined ? undefined : contested.get(c.operation);
+        if (rivals !== undefined) {
+            return answer(c.id, "unconfirmed", [], `operationId '${c.operation}' is exposed by more than one service on this checklist (${rivals.join(", ")}), ` +
+                `so ${reportName} cannot say whose suite exercised it. Record each service's claims from its own repo with --service.`);
+        }
+        if (c.operation === undefined) {
+            // Unreachable for the api.exposes claims this loam derives, which always
+            // carry one — but the function is total, and a claim without a join key
+            // must fail closed rather than throw or silently confirm.
+            return answer(c.id, "unconfirmed", [], "claim carries no operationId for a contract report to match on");
+        }
+        const matching = runs.filter((r) => r.operationId === c.operation);
+        if (matching.length === 0) {
+            return answer(c.id, "unconfirmed", [], `not exercised — no entry in ${reportName} names operationId '${c.operation}'`);
+        }
+        const failing = matching.filter((r) => r.status !== "passed");
+        if (failing.length === 0) {
+            return answer(c.id, "confirmed", matching.map((r) => `${reportName}: ${r.test ?? `operationId '${c.operation}' passed`}`));
+        }
+        const first = failing[0];
+        const why = first.status === "failed" ? "failed" : `status '${first.status}' is not 'passed'`;
+        const rerun = matching.length > 1 ? ` — ${failing.length} of ${matching.length} matching entries did not pass` : "";
+        return answer(c.id, "unconfirmed", [], `${why} (${reportName}${first.test === undefined ? "" : `: ${first.test}`})${rerun}`);
+    });
+}
+function answer(id, verdict, evidence, note) {
+    return { id, verdict, evidence, ...(note === undefined ? {} : { note }), answered_by: "external-runner" };
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=contract.js.map

package/dist/core/verify/evidence/contract.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"contract.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../../src/core/verify/evidence/contract.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAiCG;AACH,OAAO,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,yBAAyB,CAAC;AACnD,OAAO,EAAe,MAAM,eAAe,CAAC;AAC5C,OAAO,EAAc,MAAM,iBAAiB,CAAC;AAE7C,6FAA6F;AAC7F,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,sBAAsB,GAAG,oBAAoB,CAAC;AAC3D,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,uBAAuB,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;AAezC;;;;GAIG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,kBAAkB,CAAC,GAAY,EAAE,UAAkB;IACjE,MAAM,KAAK,GACT,KAAK,sBAAsB,MAAM,uBAAuB,0DAA0D,CAAC;IACrH,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,sBAAsB,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QACvD,OAAO;YACL,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK;YACT,OAAO,EACL,GAAG,UAAU,qEAAqE,KAAK,GAAG;gBAC1F,mIAAmI;SACtI,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;IACD,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,sBAAsB,CAAC,KAAK,uBAAuB,EAAE,CAAC;QAC5D,yEAAyE;QACzE,qEAAqE;QACrE,OAAO;YACL,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK;YACT,OAAO,EACL,GAAG,UAAU,aAAa,sBAAsB,KAAK,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,sBAAsB,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK;gBACrG,2BAA2B,uBAAuB,QAAQ;SAC7D,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;IACD,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/B,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAC5B,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,UAAU,wCAAwC,KAAK,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC;IAC/F,CAAC;IACD,MAAM,IAAI,GAAkB,EAAE,CAAC;IAC/B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3C,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,GAAG,UAAU,UAAU,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAC7C,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC;YAAE,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,gCAAgC,KAAK,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC;QACtG,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,CAAC;QACzC,IAAI,OAAO,WAAW,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAI,WAAW,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAChE,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,yEAAyE,EAAE,CAAC;QACnH,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;QAC/B,IAAI,OAAO,MAAM,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACtD,OAAO;gBACL,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK;gBACT,OAAO,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,MAAM,WAAW,2FAA2F;aAC9H,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;QAC3B,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;YACR,WAAW;YACX,MAAM;YACN,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,IAAI,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;SACrF,CAAC,CAAC;IACL,CAAC;IACD,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;AAC5B,CAAC;AAED;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAaG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,mBAAmB,CAAC,MAAwB;IAC1D,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,EAAuB,CAAC;IAC9C,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;QACvB,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,KAAK,SAAS;YAAE,SAAS;QACxC,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,IAAI,GAAG,EAAU,CAAC;QAC1D,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC;QACpB,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;IAChC,CAAC;IACD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,EAAoB,CAAC;IAC9C,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3C,IAAI,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC;YAAE,SAAS,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACxE,CAAC;IACD,OAAO,SAAS,CAAC;AACnB,CAAC;AAED;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAcG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,eAAe,CAAC,MAAe,EAAE,IAAmB,EAAE,UAAkB;IACtF,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,mBAAmB,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC;IAC9C,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE;QACtB,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;QAClF,IAAI,MAAM,KAAK,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;YACzB,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EACJ,aAAa,EACb,EAAE,EACF,gBAAgB,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,4DAA4D,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK;gBAC3G,MAAM,UAAU,sGAAsG,CACzH,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;QACD,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,KAAK,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;YAC9B,yEAAyE;YACzE,wEAAwE;YACxE,0DAA0D;YAC1D,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,gEAAgE,CAAC,CAAC;QAC3G,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;QACnE,IAAI,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAC1B,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EACJ,aAAa,EACb,EAAE,EACF,+BAA+B,UAAU,uBAAuB,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,GAAG,CAC/E,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC;QAC9D,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACzB,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EACJ,WAAW,EACX,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,GAAG,UAAU,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,IAAI,gBAAgB,CAAC,CAAC,SAAS,UAAU,EAAE,CAAC,CACzF,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAE,CAAC;QAC1B,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,mBAAmB,CAAC;QAC9F,MAAM,KAAK,GACT,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,OAAO,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,gCAAgC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QACxG,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EACJ,aAAa,EACb,EAAE,EACF,GAAG,GAAG,KAAK,UAAU,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,IAAI,KAAK,EAAE,CACrF,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;AACL,CAAC;AAED,SAAS,MAAM,CAAC,EAAU,EAAE,OAA0B,EAAE,QAAkB,EAAE,IAAa;IACvF,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,iBAAiB,EAAE,CAAC;AAC5G,CAAC","sourcesContent":["/**\n * `loam verify --contract-results` — an API contract-test report as the answer\n * sheet for `api.exposes` claims.\n *\n * The accepted shape is loam's own documented one (SCHEMA.md, \"Contract-test\n * reports\"): `{\"loamContractReport\": 1, \"results\": [{\"operationId\": \"…\",\n * \"status\": \"passed\"}]}`. It is deliberately a shape tools EMIT INTO rather\n * than a vendor format loam parses, because no surveyed vendor format carries\n * both halves of what confirming needs — an unambiguous executed-AND-passed\n * status and a deterministic operation join key. Specmatic's JSON coverage\n * report was the v1 candidate and is declined by name: its `coverageStatus:\n * \"covered\"` means exercised, not passed (a red run still writes \"covered\"),\n * so an adapter over it would confirm exactly what a failing suite refuted.\n *\n * The operationId is the ONLY identity, matched against the structured\n * `operation` a claim carries (`../checklist.ts`). It is half an identity, and\n * the design leans on the missing half being supplied by scope: an operationId\n * is unique within ONE contract document, not across a fleet, and a report\n * entry names no service — so when more than one service on the handed-in\n * checklist exposes the same operationId, the claims are refused rather than\n * answered ({@link contestedOperations}), and `--service` is what gives a\n * contract report an owner, exactly as it is for a contested scenario digest.\n * Within one service's claims the match is exact, and renaming an operation\n * renames its claim, so rewording cannot carry an answer over. Names and free\n * text match nothing.\n *\n * Parsing is strict where the cucumber reader is tolerant, and the asymmetry\n * is deliberate: a cucumber report is another tool's file full of legitimate\n * entries loam has no business judging, while this shape exists for exactly\n * one purpose, so an entry that cannot be matched is a malformed report, not\n * scenery. A file that is recognizably not this shape refuses rather than\n * quietly answering every claim \"not exercised\" — an unparseable report never\n * silently answers zero claims as if none matched.\n */\nimport { isRecord } from \"../../kernel/records.js\";\nimport { type Answer } from \"../answers.js\";\nimport { type Claim } from \"../checklist.js\";\n\n/** The marker key that makes a JSON document this shape, and the version this loam reads. */\nexport const CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER = \"loamContractReport\";\nexport const CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION = 1;\n\n/** One report entry, reduced to what matching needs. Extra keys pass untouched. */\nexport interface ContractRun {\n  operationId: string;\n  /** Exactly `\"passed\"` confirms; `\"failed\"` and every other string do not. */\n  status: string;\n  /** Optional free text naming the test — it rides into the evidence line. */\n  test?: string;\n}\n\nexport type ContractReportRead =\n  | { ok: true; runs: ContractRun[] }\n  | { ok: false; message: string };\n\n/**\n * Read a parsed JSON document down to its runs. `reportName` is how the caller\n * spelled the file, for the refusal message; core never prints, so a refusal\n * is data for the command to fail with (`answers-unreadable`).\n */\nexport function readContractReport(doc: unknown, reportName: string): ContractReportRead {\n  const shape =\n    `{\"${CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER}\": ${CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION}, \"results\": [{\"operationId\": \"…\", \"status\": \"passed\"}]}`;\n  if (!isRecord(doc) || !(CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER in doc)) {\n    return {\n      ok: false,\n      message:\n        `${reportName} is not a contract-results report — expected loam's generic shape ${shape} ` +\n        \"(see SCHEMA.md's contract-test reports section; Specmatic, Pact, Dredd and property harnesses emit it with a one-line transform).\",\n    };\n  }\n  if (doc[CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER] !== CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION) {\n    // A later version may redefine what an entry means; reading it with this\n    // parser could confirm something the report never said. Fail closed.\n    return {\n      ok: false,\n      message:\n        `${reportName} declares ${CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER}: ${JSON.stringify(doc[CONTRACT_REPORT_MARKER])} — ` +\n        `this loam reads version ${CONTRACT_REPORT_VERSION} only.`,\n    };\n  }\n  const results = doc[\"results\"];\n  if (!Array.isArray(results)) {\n    return { ok: false, message: `${reportName} has no \\`results\\` array — expected ${shape}.` };\n  }\n  const runs: ContractRun[] = [];\n  for (const [i, entry] of results.entries()) {\n    const where = `${reportName} entry ${i + 1}`;\n    if (!isRecord(entry)) return { ok: false, message: `${where} is not an object — expected ${shape}.` };\n    const operationId = entry[\"operationId\"];\n    if (typeof operationId !== \"string\" || operationId.length === 0) {\n      return { ok: false, message: `${where} has no operationId — every entry must name the operation it exercised.` };\n    }\n    const status = entry[\"status\"];\n    if (typeof status !== \"string\" || status.length === 0) {\n      return {\n        ok: false,\n        message: `${where} ('${operationId}') has no status — expected \"passed\", \"failed\", or the tool's own word for anything else.`,\n      };\n    }\n    const test = entry[\"test\"];\n    runs.push({\n      operationId,\n      status,\n      ...(typeof test === \"string\" && test.trim().length > 0 ? { test: test.trim() } : {}),\n    });\n  }\n  return { ok: true, runs };\n}\n\n/**\n * The operationIds that more than one service on this checklist exposes, with\n * the services that expose them — `contestedDigests`' (core/results.ts) exact\n * shape, for this axis's join key.\n *\n * An operationId is unique within one contract document, not across a fleet:\n * two services may each expose a 'createSplit', and a report entry carries no\n * service half, so a single contract report matches both services' claims and\n * cannot say whose suite it describes. The all-at-once form once confirmed a\n * service from a suite that never touched it exactly this way. loam does not\n * choose: those claims are refused rather than answered, and `--service` is\n * what gives a report an owner — it narrows the checklist to one subject\n * before the matching starts, so nothing handed in here is contested.\n */\nexport function contestedOperations(claims: readonly Claim[]): Map<string, string[]> {\n  const owners = new Map<string, Set<string>>();\n  for (const c of claims) {\n    if (c.operation === undefined) continue;\n    const seen = owners.get(c.operation) ?? new Set<string>();\n    seen.add(c.subject);\n    owners.set(c.operation, seen);\n  }\n  const contested = new Map<string, string[]>();\n  for (const [operation, services] of owners) {\n    if (services.size > 1) contested.set(operation, [...services].sort());\n  }\n  return contested;\n}\n\n/**\n * Answer every claim from the report — the contract runner's half of the\n * record. Total over the claims handed in, like `runnerAnswers`: a claim the\n * report does not exercise is answered `unconfirmed`, never skipped, because\n * silence must never read as checked. Report entries matching no claim are\n * skipped silently — a real contract suite exercises the whole living API,\n * and the claims only ever cover what the feature ADDS.\n *\n * Confirmation is strict on purpose: every matching entry (an operationId the\n * report holds twice is two test cases, and all of them count) has status\n * exactly `\"passed\"`. One non-passed entry wins as failure, and an unknown\n * status is named in the note rather than rounded to either verdict. An\n * operationId two services expose is refused before any of that: see\n * {@link contestedOperations}.\n */\nexport function contractAnswers(claims: Claim[], runs: ContractRun[], reportName: string): Answer[] {\n  const contested = contestedOperations(claims);\n  return claims.map((c) => {\n    const rivals = c.operation === undefined ? undefined : contested.get(c.operation);\n    if (rivals !== undefined) {\n      return answer(\n        c.id,\n        \"unconfirmed\",\n        [],\n        `operationId '${c.operation}' is exposed by more than one service on this checklist (${rivals.join(\", \")}), ` +\n          `so ${reportName} cannot say whose suite exercised it. Record each service's claims from its own repo with --service.`,\n      );\n    }\n    if (c.operation === undefined) {\n      // Unreachable for the api.exposes claims this loam derives, which always\n      // carry one — but the function is total, and a claim without a join key\n      // must fail closed rather than throw or silently confirm.\n      return answer(c.id, \"unconfirmed\", [], \"claim carries no operationId for a contract report to match on\");\n    }\n    const matching = runs.filter((r) => r.operationId === c.operation);\n    if (matching.length === 0) {\n      return answer(\n        c.id,\n        \"unconfirmed\",\n        [],\n        `not exercised — no entry in ${reportName} names operationId '${c.operation}'`,\n      );\n    }\n    const failing = matching.filter((r) => r.status !== \"passed\");\n    if (failing.length === 0) {\n      return answer(\n        c.id,\n        \"confirmed\",\n        matching.map((r) => `${reportName}: ${r.test ?? `operationId '${c.operation}' passed`}`),\n      );\n    }\n    const first = failing[0]!;\n    const why = first.status === \"failed\" ? \"failed\" : `status '${first.status}' is not 'passed'`;\n    const rerun =\n      matching.length > 1 ? ` — ${failing.length} of ${matching.length} matching entries did not pass` : \"\";\n    return answer(\n      c.id,\n      \"unconfirmed\",\n      [],\n      `${why} (${reportName}${first.test === undefined ? \"\" : `: ${first.test}`})${rerun}`,\n    );\n  });\n}\n\nfunction answer(id: string, verdict: Answer[\"verdict\"], evidence: string[], note?: string): Answer {\n  return { id, verdict, evidence, ...(note === undefined ? {} : { note }), answered_by: \"external-runner\" };\n}\n"]}