@ybotok/loam 0.1.0-beta.2 → 0.2.0-alpha.1

package/dist/core/verify/answers.js

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/**
+ * The answers, and the one thing loam checks about them.
+ *
+ * loam does not judge an answer. It cannot: it never read the code. What it
+ * guarantees is that every question was asked and that every answer sits next
+ * to the question it answers — so an answer set that does not correspond to the
+ * current checklist is refused rather than merged. An unchecked claim must
+ * never be able to masquerade as checked, and that refusal is `checkAnswers`.
+ *
+ * A scenario claim is answered mechanically wherever it can be: `--results`
+ * reads a cucumber JSON report and matches it by the digest tag `loam gherkin`
+ * stamped, and only a green run confirms one (`core/results.ts`). Where it
+ * cannot — a legacy service whose suite is months away, which is the fleet loam
+ * exists for — `--record` may still take an agent's word for it, and
+ * `./record.ts` marks that answer attested rather than run.
+ */
+import { isRecord } from "../kernel/records.js";
+import {} from "./checklist.js";
+import {} from "./pins/pin.js";
+/**
+ * Two verdicts, deliberately. Anything an agent cannot show evidence for is
+ * unconfirmed — a third value for "not applicable" would absorb every claim
+ * nobody wanted to answer.
+ */
+export const VERDICTS = ["confirmed", "unconfirmed"];
+/**
+ * Who answered a claim: the `runner` (a cucumber report's digest-tagged
+ * scenarios, matched mechanically by `--results`), the `external-runner` (an
+ * API contract-test report's operationId-matched entries, matched mechanically
+ * by `--contract-results` — external because loam did not generate the suite
+ * the way it generates the gherkin, so the join key is the operationId the
+ * claim asserts rather than a digest loam stamped), or an `agent` (somebody's
+ * word about the code, taken back by `--record`). On the record so a reviewer
+ * can tell a green run from an assertion. `external-runner` never answers a
+ * `scenario.tested` claim, which is what keeps the attested boundary —
+ * `attestedClaims` in `./record.ts` — exactly where it was.
+ */
+export const ANSWERED_BY = ["runner", "external-runner", "agent"];
+/**
+ * Accept an answer set only if it answers THIS checklist: every claim once, no
+ * claim twice, nothing extra, and no "confirmed" that shows nothing.
+ *
+ * The refusals are the point of the command. If a stale or partial answer file
+ * could be recorded, `verification.yaml` would say a claim was checked when
+ * nobody ever asked it — and a record that can lie is worse than no record,
+ * because it looks like evidence.
+ *
+ * `runnerOwned` is the composition rule under `--results` and
+ * `--contract-results`: ids a mechanical report answers — scenario claims under
+ * the first flag, api.exposes claims under the second — which an answers file
+ * must therefore not touch. An entry naming one refuses with its own diagnosis
+ * — the id IS on the feature's checklist, so calling it unknown would send the
+ * caller hunting a staleness that is not there. `--diff-answers`
+ * (commands/verify/cross/diff.ts) calls this with it UNSET on purpose: under a
+ * diff both agents answer everything in scope, scenario claims included,
+ * because the diff consults no report — so making scenario claims runner-only
+ * even without `--results` would break that lens.
+ *
+ * `context` is what turns the last line from a circle into an instruction. In a
+ * fleet the commonest way to "miss" a claim is that it is not yours: the
+ * checklist spans ten repositories and this one can only answer its own. Told
+ * only to "answer the claims it lists", an agent in the payment-service repo
+ * re-runs verify, sees the same checkout-web claims it cannot speak for, and
+ * either loops or invents evidence. So when every unanswered claim belongs to
+ * another service, say THAT, and name the command that records them.
+ */
+export function checkAnswers(claims, raw, runnerOwned, context) {
+    const refuse = (code, message) => ({ ok: false, code, message });
+    const list = Array.isArray(raw)
+        ? raw
+        : isRecord(raw) && Array.isArray(raw["answers"])
+            ? raw["answers"]
+            : null;
+    if (list === null) {
+        return refuse("answers-unreadable", "Expected a JSON array of answers, or an object with an `answers` array: " +
+            `[{ "id": "...", "verdict": "confirmed", "evidence": ["file:line"] }]`);
+    }
+    const answers = [];
+    for (const [i, entry] of list.entries()) {
+        const where = `answer ${i + 1}`;
+        if (!isRecord(entry))
+            return refuse("answers-unreadable", `${where} is not an object`);
+        const id = entry["id"];
+        if (typeof id !== "string" || id.length === 0) {
+            return refuse("answers-unreadable", `${where} has no claim id`);
+        }
+        const verdict = entry["verdict"];
+        if (typeof verdict !== "string" || !VERDICTS.includes(verdict)) {
+            return refuse("answers-unreadable", `${where} ('${id}') has verdict ${JSON.stringify(verdict)} — expected one of ${VERDICTS.join(", ")}`);
+        }
+        const note = typeof entry["note"] === "string" ? entry["note"].trim() : "";
+        answers.push({
+            id,
+            verdict: verdict,
+            evidence: stringList(entry["evidence"]),
+            ...(note.length > 0 ? { note } : {}),
+            answered_by: "agent",
+        });
+    }
+    const byId = new Map();
+    const twice = [];
+    for (const a of answers) {
+        if (byId.has(a.id))
+            twice.push(a.id);
+        else
+            byId.set(a.id, a);
+    }
+    const known = new Set(claims.map((c) => c.id));
+    const strayIds = [...new Set(answers.map((a) => a.id).filter((id) => !known.has(id)))];
+    const runnerHit = strayIds.filter((id) => runnerOwned?.has(id) === true);
+    const unknown = strayIds.filter((id) => runnerOwned?.has(id) !== true);
+    const missingClaims = claims.filter((c) => !byId.has(c.id));
+    const missing = missingClaims.map((c) => c.id);
+    if (runnerHit.length + unknown.length + missing.length + twice.length > 0) {
+        const parts = [
+            runnerHit.length > 0
+                ? `${runnerHit.length} answer(s) name claim(s) a report owns under --results or --contract-results: ${runnerHit.join(", ")} — the report answers those; take them out of the answers file`
+                : "",
+            unknown.length > 0 ? `${unknown.length} answer(s) name a claim that is not on the checklist: ${unknown.join(", ")}` : "",
+            missing.length > 0 ? `${missing.length} claim(s) have no answer: ${missing.join(", ")}` : "",
+            twice.length > 0 ? `${twice.length} claim(s) answered more than once: ${[...new Set(twice)].join(", ")}` : "",
+        ].filter((s) => s.length > 0);
+        return refuse("answers-mismatch", `These answers do not match the checklist — ${parts.join("; ")}. ` +
+            missingAdvice(missingClaims, claims.filter((c) => byId.has(c.id)), context));
+    }
+    const unevidenced = claims
+        .map((c) => byId.get(c.id))
+        .filter((a) => a.verdict === "confirmed" && a.evidence.length === 0)
+        .map((a) => a.id);
+    if (unevidenced.length > 0) {
+        return refuse("answers-unevidenced", `${unevidenced.length} claim(s) are confirmed with no evidence: ${unevidenced.join(", ")}. A confirmation with nothing behind it is an assertion — give a file:line, or answer 'unconfirmed'.`);
+    }
+    // Checklist order, not the order they were written in: the record reads in the
+    // order the questions were asked, whatever the agent did.
+    return { ok: true, answers: claims.map((c) => byId.get(c.id)) };
+}
+/**
+ * The last sentence of an `answers-mismatch`. "Re-run and answer the claims it
+ * lists" is sound advice only when the caller CAN answer them. In a fleet the
+ * checklist is federated — a feature's claims are filed under the service whose
+ * code answers them — so the honest diagnosis for a repo that answered
+ * everything it owns is "the rest is not yours", together with the form that
+ * records the rest. Anything else sends the caller round the same loop.
+ */
+function missingAdvice(missing, answered, context) {
+    const generic = "Re-run `loam verify` and answer the claims it lists.";
+    if (context === undefined || missing.length === 0 || answered.length === 0)
+        return generic;
+    // The signature of "I answered mine and the rest is not mine": the services
+    // that own the unanswered claims and the services that own the answered ones
+    // do not overlap. A single-service checklist with one claim forgotten fails
+    // this test and keeps the generic advice, which is the right advice there —
+    // that claim really is the caller's to answer.
+    const owners = [...new Set(missing.map((c) => c.subject))].sort();
+    const covered = new Set(answered.map((c) => c.subject));
+    if (owners.some((s) => covered.has(s)))
+        return generic;
+    const form = `\`loam verify ${context.feature} --record answers.json --service <svc>\``;
+    const mine = context.service;
+    return mine === undefined
+        ? `Those claims are owned by ${owners.join(", ")} — each service attests its own from its own repository (${form}); ` +
+            "this all-at-once form has to answer the whole checklist in one file."
+        : `Every unanswered claim belongs to a different service (${owners.join(", ")}) and this repository can only attest '${mine}' — ` +
+            `run ${form} in each of those repositories instead.`;
+}
+function stringList(v) {
+    if (typeof v === "string")
+        return v.trim().length > 0 ? [v.trim()] : [];
+    if (!Array.isArray(v))
+        return [];
+    return v.map((x) => String(x).trim()).filter((s) => s.length > 0);
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=answers.js.map

package/dist/core/verify/answers.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"answers.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/core/verify/answers.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GAeG;AACH,OAAO,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAChD,OAAO,EAAc,MAAM,gBAAgB,CAAC;AAC5C,OAAO,EAAoB,MAAM,eAAe,CAAC;AAEjD;;;;GAIG;AACH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,aAAa,CAAU,CAAC;AAG9D;;;;;;;;;;;GAWG;AACH,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,iBAAiB,EAAE,OAAO,CAAU,CAAC;AA4B3E;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;GA2BG;AACH,MAAM,UAAU,YAAY,CAC1B,MAAe,EACf,GAAY,EACZ,WAAiC,EACjC,OAA+C;IAE/C,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,IAAmB,EAAE,OAAe,EAAe,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IAErG,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC;QAC7B,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG;QACL,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;YAC9C,CAAC,CAAE,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAe;YAC/B,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;IACX,IAAI,IAAI,KAAK,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;QAClB,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,oBAAoB,EACpB,0EAA0E;YACxE,sEAAsE,CACzE,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;IAED,MAAM,OAAO,GAAa,EAAE,CAAC;IAC7B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC;QACxC,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,UAAU,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAChC,IAAI,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC;YAAE,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,oBAAoB,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,mBAAmB,CAAC,CAAC;QACvF,MAAM,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;QACvB,IAAI,OAAO,EAAE,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAC9C,OAAO,MAAM,CAAC,oBAAoB,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,kBAAkB,CAAC,CAAC;QAClE,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC;QACjC,IAAI,OAAO,OAAO,KAAK,QAAQ,IAAI,CAAE,QAA8B,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACtF,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,oBAAoB,EACpB,GAAG,KAAK,MAAM,EAAE,kBAAkB,IAAI,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,sBAAsB,QAAQ,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CACrG,CAAC;QACJ,CAAC;QACD,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,OAAO,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,KAAK,QAAQ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3E,OAAO,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC;YACX,EAAE;YACF,OAAO,EAAE,OAAkB;YAC3B,QAAQ,EAAE,UAAU,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,UAAU,CAAC,CAAC;YACvC,GAAG,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YACpC,WAAW,EAAE,OAAO;SACrB,CAAC,CAAC;IACL,CAAC;IAED,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,EAAkB,CAAC;IACvC,MAAM,KAAK,GAAa,EAAE,CAAC;IAC3B,KAAK,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;QACxB,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAAE,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;;YAChC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACzB,CAAC;IACD,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/C,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACvF,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;IACzE,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC;IACvE,MAAM,aAAa,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5D,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,aAAa,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/C,IAAI,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAC1E,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG;YACZ,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC;gBAClB,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,iFAAiF,SAAS,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,gEAAgE;gBAC1L,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE;YACN,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,yDAAyD,OAAO,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE;YACxH,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,6BAA6B,OAAO,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE;YAC5F,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,MAAM,sCAAsC,CAAC,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE;SAC9G,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QAC9B,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,kBAAkB,EAClB,8CAA8C,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI;YAChE,aAAa,CAAC,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,CAC9E,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;IAED,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,MAAM;SACvB,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAE,CAAC;SAC3B,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,WAAW,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC;SACnE,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACpB,IAAI,WAAW,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;QAC3B,OAAO,MAAM,CACX,qBAAqB,EACrB,GAAG,WAAW,CAAC,MAAM,6CAA6C,WAAW,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,sGAAsG,CAC/L,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC;IAED,+EAA+E;IAC/E,0DAA0D;IAC1D,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAE,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;AACnE,CAAC;AAED;;;;;;;GAOG;AACH,SAAS,aAAa,CACpB,OAAgB,EAChB,QAAiB,EACjB,OAA+C;IAE/C,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,sDAAsD,CAAC;IACvE,IAAI,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC;QAAE,OAAO,OAAO,CAAC;IAC3F,4EAA4E;IAC5E,6EAA6E;IAC7E,4EAA4E;IAC5E,4EAA4E;IAC5E,+CAA+C;IAC/C,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;IAClE,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACxD,IAAI,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QAAE,OAAO,OAAO,CAAC;IACvD,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,iBAAiB,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,0CAA0C,CAAC;IACxF,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC;IAC7B,OAAO,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS;QACvB,CAAC,CAAC,6BAA6B,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,4DAA4D,IAAI,KAAK;YACjH,sEAAsE;QAC1E,CAAC,CAAC,0DAA0D,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,0CAA0C,IAAI,MAAM;YAC7H,OAAO,IAAI,yCAAyC,CAAC;AAC7D,CAAC;AAED,SAAS,UAAU,CAAC,CAAU;IAC5B,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,KAAK,QAAQ;QAAE,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACxE,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;QAAE,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;IACjC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;AACpE,CAAC","sourcesContent":["/**\n * The answers, and the one thing loam checks about them.\n *\n * loam does not judge an answer. It cannot: it never read the code. What it\n * guarantees is that every question was asked and that every answer sits next\n * to the question it answers — so an answer set that does not correspond to the\n * current checklist is refused rather than merged. An unchecked claim must\n * never be able to masquerade as checked, and that refusal is `checkAnswers`.\n *\n * A scenario claim is answered mechanically wherever it can be: `--results`\n * reads a cucumber JSON report and matches it by the digest tag `loam gherkin`\n * stamped, and only a green run confirms one (`core/results.ts`). Where it\n * cannot — a legacy service whose suite is months away, which is the fleet loam\n * exists for — `--record` may still take an agent's word for it, and\n * `./record.ts` marks that answer attested rather than run.\n */\nimport { isRecord } from \"../kernel/records.js\";\nimport { type Claim } from \"./checklist.js\";\nimport { type EvidencePin } from \"./pins/pin.js\";\n\n/**\n * Two verdicts, deliberately. Anything an agent cannot show evidence for is\n * unconfirmed — a third value for \"not applicable\" would absorb every claim\n * nobody wanted to answer.\n */\nexport const VERDICTS = [\"confirmed\", \"unconfirmed\"] as const;\nexport type Verdict = (typeof VERDICTS)[number];\n\n/**\n * Who answered a claim: the `runner` (a cucumber report's digest-tagged\n * scenarios, matched mechanically by `--results`), the `external-runner` (an\n * API contract-test report's operationId-matched entries, matched mechanically\n * by `--contract-results` — external because loam did not generate the suite\n * the way it generates the gherkin, so the join key is the operationId the\n * claim asserts rather than a digest loam stamped), or an `agent` (somebody's\n * word about the code, taken back by `--record`). On the record so a reviewer\n * can tell a green run from an assertion. `external-runner` never answers a\n * `scenario.tested` claim, which is what keeps the attested boundary —\n * `attestedClaims` in `./record.ts` — exactly where it was.\n */\nexport const ANSWERED_BY = [\"runner\", \"external-runner\", \"agent\"] as const;\nexport type AnsweredBy = (typeof ANSWERED_BY)[number];\n\nexport interface Answer {\n  id: string;\n  verdict: Verdict;\n  /** Where it can be seen — `file:line`, or a report scenario for the runner. Required for `confirmed`. */\n  evidence: string[];\n  note?: string;\n  answered_by: AnsweredBy;\n  /**\n   * loam's own stamp, never caller input: `validateServiceEvidence` computes\n   * these from the attested commit's blobs and the record path attaches them.\n   * `checkAnswers` below deliberately never reads the field, so an\n   * `evidence_pins` key in an answers FILE is ignored, not honored — an agent\n   * must not be able to hand loam a pin loam did not derive.\n   */\n  evidence_pins?: EvidencePin[];\n}\n\n/** Why an answer set was refused. Each names a different way it fails to answer. */\nexport type AnswerRefusal = \"answers-unreadable\" | \"answers-mismatch\" | \"answers-unevidenced\";\n\nexport type AnswerCheck =\n  /** The answers, re-ordered to the checklist, one per claim. */\n  | { ok: true; answers: Answer[] }\n  | { ok: false; code: AnswerRefusal; message: string };\n\n/**\n * Accept an answer set only if it answers THIS checklist: every claim once, no\n * claim twice, nothing extra, and no \"confirmed\" that shows nothing.\n *\n * The refusals are the point of the command. If a stale or partial answer file\n * could be recorded, `verification.yaml` would say a claim was checked when\n * nobody ever asked it — and a record that can lie is worse than no record,\n * because it looks like evidence.\n *\n * `runnerOwned` is the composition rule under `--results` and\n * `--contract-results`: ids a mechanical report answers — scenario claims under\n * the first flag, api.exposes claims under the second — which an answers file\n * must therefore not touch. An entry naming one refuses with its own diagnosis\n * — the id IS on the feature's checklist, so calling it unknown would send the\n * caller hunting a staleness that is not there. `--diff-answers`\n * (commands/verify/cross/diff.ts) calls this with it UNSET on purpose: under a\n * diff both agents answer everything in scope, scenario claims included,\n * because the diff consults no report — so making scenario claims runner-only\n * even without `--results` would break that lens.\n *\n * `context` is what turns the last line from a circle into an instruction. In a\n * fleet the commonest way to \"miss\" a claim is that it is not yours: the\n * checklist spans ten repositories and this one can only answer its own. Told\n * only to \"answer the claims it lists\", an agent in the payment-service repo\n * re-runs verify, sees the same checkout-web claims it cannot speak for, and\n * either loops or invents evidence. So when every unanswered claim belongs to\n * another service, say THAT, and name the command that records them.\n */\nexport function checkAnswers(\n  claims: Claim[],\n  raw: unknown,\n  runnerOwned?: ReadonlySet<string>,\n  context?: { feature: string; service?: string },\n): AnswerCheck {\n  const refuse = (code: AnswerRefusal, message: string): AnswerCheck => ({ ok: false, code, message });\n\n  const list = Array.isArray(raw)\n    ? raw\n    : isRecord(raw) && Array.isArray(raw[\"answers\"])\n      ? (raw[\"answers\"] as unknown[])\n      : null;\n  if (list === null) {\n    return refuse(\n      \"answers-unreadable\",\n      \"Expected a JSON array of answers, or an object with an `answers` array: \" +\n        `[{ \"id\": \"...\", \"verdict\": \"confirmed\", \"evidence\": [\"file:line\"] }]`,\n    );\n  }\n\n  const answers: Answer[] = [];\n  for (const [i, entry] of list.entries()) {\n    const where = `answer ${i + 1}`;\n    if (!isRecord(entry)) return refuse(\"answers-unreadable\", `${where} is not an object`);\n    const id = entry[\"id\"];\n    if (typeof id !== \"string\" || id.length === 0) {\n      return refuse(\"answers-unreadable\", `${where} has no claim id`);\n    }\n    const verdict = entry[\"verdict\"];\n    if (typeof verdict !== \"string\" || !(VERDICTS as readonly string[]).includes(verdict)) {\n      return refuse(\n        \"answers-unreadable\",\n        `${where} ('${id}') has verdict ${JSON.stringify(verdict)} — expected one of ${VERDICTS.join(\", \")}`,\n      );\n    }\n    const note = typeof entry[\"note\"] === \"string\" ? entry[\"note\"].trim() : \"\";\n    answers.push({\n      id,\n      verdict: verdict as Verdict,\n      evidence: stringList(entry[\"evidence\"]),\n      ...(note.length > 0 ? { note } : {}),\n      answered_by: \"agent\",\n    });\n  }\n\n  const byId = new Map<string, Answer>();\n  const twice: string[] = [];\n  for (const a of answers) {\n    if (byId.has(a.id)) twice.push(a.id);\n    else byId.set(a.id, a);\n  }\n  const known = new Set(claims.map((c) => c.id));\n  const strayIds = [...new Set(answers.map((a) => a.id).filter((id) => !known.has(id)))];\n  const runnerHit = strayIds.filter((id) => runnerOwned?.has(id) === true);\n  const unknown = strayIds.filter((id) => runnerOwned?.has(id) !== true);\n  const missingClaims = claims.filter((c) => !byId.has(c.id));\n  const missing = missingClaims.map((c) => c.id);\n  if (runnerHit.length + unknown.length + missing.length + twice.length > 0) {\n    const parts = [\n      runnerHit.length > 0\n        ? `${runnerHit.length} answer(s) name claim(s) a report owns under --results or --contract-results: ${runnerHit.join(\", \")} — the report answers those; take them out of the answers file`\n        : \"\",\n      unknown.length > 0 ? `${unknown.length} answer(s) name a claim that is not on the checklist: ${unknown.join(\", \")}` : \"\",\n      missing.length > 0 ? `${missing.length} claim(s) have no answer: ${missing.join(\", \")}` : \"\",\n      twice.length > 0 ? `${twice.length} claim(s) answered more than once: ${[...new Set(twice)].join(\", \")}` : \"\",\n    ].filter((s) => s.length > 0);\n    return refuse(\n      \"answers-mismatch\",\n      `These answers do not match the checklist — ${parts.join(\"; \")}. ` +\n        missingAdvice(missingClaims, claims.filter((c) => byId.has(c.id)), context),\n    );\n  }\n\n  const unevidenced = claims\n    .map((c) => byId.get(c.id)!)\n    .filter((a) => a.verdict === \"confirmed\" && a.evidence.length === 0)\n    .map((a) => a.id);\n  if (unevidenced.length > 0) {\n    return refuse(\n      \"answers-unevidenced\",\n      `${unevidenced.length} claim(s) are confirmed with no evidence: ${unevidenced.join(\", \")}. A confirmation with nothing behind it is an assertion — give a file:line, or answer 'unconfirmed'.`,\n    );\n  }\n\n  // Checklist order, not the order they were written in: the record reads in the\n  // order the questions were asked, whatever the agent did.\n  return { ok: true, answers: claims.map((c) => byId.get(c.id)!) };\n}\n\n/**\n * The last sentence of an `answers-mismatch`. \"Re-run and answer the claims it\n * lists\" is sound advice only when the caller CAN answer them. In a fleet the\n * checklist is federated — a feature's claims are filed under the service whose\n * code answers them — so the honest diagnosis for a repo that answered\n * everything it owns is \"the rest is not yours\", together with the form that\n * records the rest. Anything else sends the caller round the same loop.\n */\nfunction missingAdvice(\n  missing: Claim[],\n  answered: Claim[],\n  context?: { feature: string; service?: string },\n): string {\n  const generic = \"Re-run `loam verify` and answer the claims it lists.\";\n  if (context === undefined || missing.length === 0 || answered.length === 0) return generic;\n  // The signature of \"I answered mine and the rest is not mine\": the services\n  // that own the unanswered claims and the services that own the answered ones\n  // do not overlap. A single-service checklist with one claim forgotten fails\n  // this test and keeps the generic advice, which is the right advice there —\n  // that claim really is the caller's to answer.\n  const owners = [...new Set(missing.map((c) => c.subject))].sort();\n  const covered = new Set(answered.map((c) => c.subject));\n  if (owners.some((s) => covered.has(s))) return generic;\n  const form = `\\`loam verify ${context.feature} --record answers.json --service <svc>\\``;\n  const mine = context.service;\n  return mine === undefined\n    ? `Those claims are owned by ${owners.join(\", \")} — each service attests its own from its own repository (${form}); ` +\n        \"this all-at-once form has to answer the whole checklist in one file.\"\n    : `Every unanswered claim belongs to a different service (${owners.join(\", \")}) and this repository can only attest '${mine}' — ` +\n        `run ${form} in each of those repositories instead.`;\n}\n\nfunction stringList(v: unknown): string[] {\n  if (typeof v === \"string\") return v.trim().length > 0 ? [v.trim()] : [];\n  if (!Array.isArray(v)) return [];\n  return v.map((x) => String(x).trim()).filter((s) => s.length > 0);\n}\n\n"]}

package/dist/core/verify/build.js

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
+/**
+ * Checklist plus answers becomes a record — once for a feature answered all at
+ * once, once for a fleet answering service by service.
+ *
+ * The federated form is separate from `buildVerification` and not a flag on it
+ * because the two disagree about what an unanswered claim means: answering
+ * everything at once, a missing answer is a gap in this run, while a federated
+ * record is assembled from attestations that each covered one service and were
+ * never expected to cover the rest.
+ */
+import {} from "./checklist.js";
+import {} from "./answers.js";
+import {} from "./record.js";
+export function buildVerification(checklist, answers, today, reports = {}) {
+    const byId = new Map(answers.map((a) => [a.id, a]));
+    const claims = checklist.claims.map((c) => {
+        // Callers hand in an answer per claim — `runnerAnswers` is total over the
+        // checklist, and both other callers map the checklist to build theirs. The
+        // branch is here because the alternative to a diagnosis is a `TypeError` on
+        // `a.verdict`, which cli.ts reports as `internal` with a stack about a
+        // property of `undefined` and no word about which claim went missing.
+        const a = byId.get(c.id);
+        if (a === undefined)
+            throw new Error(`buildVerification: no answer for claim ${c.id}`);
+        // Deliberately no `evidence_pins` here: the legacy all-at-once form binds
+        // to no commit, so there is no attested blob to pin — and none is ever
+        // handed in, because pins are computed inside the federated evidence
+        // validation this form never runs.
+        return {
+            id: c.id,
+            kind: c.kind,
+            claim: c.claim,
+            verdict: a.verdict,
+            answered_by: a.answered_by,
+            evidence: a.evidence,
+            ...(a.note === undefined ? {} : { note: a.note }),
+        };
+    });
+    const confirmed = claims.filter((c) => c.verdict === "confirmed").length;
+    return {
+        feature: checklist.feature,
+        recorded: today,
+        checklist: checklist.digest,
+        summary: { claims: claims.length, confirmed, unconfirmed: claims.length - confirmed },
+        claims,
+        ...(reports.results === undefined ? {} : { report: reports.results }),
+        ...(reports.contract === undefined ? {} : { contractReport: reports.contract }),
+    };
+}
+export function buildFederatedVerification(checklist, attestation, answers, previous) {
+    const { service, recorded, commit, reports, docsCommit } = attestation;
+    const currentById = new Map(checklist.claims.map((claim) => [claim.id, claim]));
+    const localIds = new Set(checklist.claims.filter((claim) => claim.subject === service).map((claim) => claim.id));
+    // An old all-at-once record remains readable, but its answers have no commit
+    // attestation and therefore cannot silently become somebody else's
+    // federated contribution. The first schema-2 write starts a clean federation.
+    const previouslyAttested = new Set((previous?.attestations ?? []).flatMap((a) => a.claims));
+    const retained = (previous?.schema === 2 ? previous.claims : []).filter((claim) => {
+        const current = currentById.get(claim.id);
+        return current !== undefined && current.subject !== service && previouslyAttested.has(claim.id);
+    });
+    const local = answers.map((answer) => {
+        // Same contract as `buildVerification`: an answer is built from the live
+        // checklist, so it always names a current claim. Off-checklist answers do
+        // NOT belong here — `discarded` means "an answer the PREVIOUS record held",
+        // and routing an incoming stray into it would change what the printed
+        // notice tells an operator. A caller that reaches this gets told which
+        // answer it was rather than a `TypeError` on `claim.kind`.
+        const claim = currentById.get(answer.id);
+        if (claim === undefined) {
+            throw new Error(`buildFederatedVerification: answer ${answer.id} names no current claim`);
+        }
+        return {
+            id: claim.id,
+            kind: claim.kind,
+            subject: claim.subject,
+            claim: claim.claim,
+            verdict: answer.verdict,
+            answered_by: answer.answered_by,
+            evidence: answer.evidence,
+            ...(answer.note === undefined ? {} : { note: answer.note }),
+            // The pins the evidence validation stamped onto this repository's
+            // answers ride into the record here; retained other-service claims are
+            // spread whole below, so THEIR pins survive a re-record untouched.
+            ...(answer.evidence_pins === undefined ? {} : { evidence_pins: answer.evidence_pins }),
+        };
+    });
+    const byId = new Map([...retained, ...local].map((claim) => [claim.id, claim]));
+    const claims = checklist.claims.flatMap((claim) => {
+        const answer = byId.get(claim.id);
+        if (answer === undefined)
+            return [];
+        // Normalize retained legacy entries to the current question text and add
+        // the subject schema 2 needs for future independent replacement.
+        return [{ ...answer, kind: claim.kind, subject: claim.subject, claim: claim.claim }];
+    });
+    const retainedAttestations = (previous?.attestations ?? []).flatMap((attestation) => {
+        if (attestation.service === service)
+            return [];
+        const ids = attestation.claims.filter((id) => currentById.get(id)?.subject === attestation.service && byId.has(id));
+        return ids.length === 0 ? [] : [{ ...attestation, claims: ids }];
+    });
+    const attestations = [
+        ...retainedAttestations,
+        {
+            service,
+            commit,
+            recorded,
+            claims: checklist.claims.filter((c) => localIds.has(c.id)).map((c) => c.id),
+            // What THIS repository answered, and what it answered it against. Both
+            // ride with the attestation rather than the record for the reason the
+            // reports do: they are one repository's facts, pruned and retained with
+            // that repository's answers.
+            checklist: checklist.digest,
+            ...(docsCommit === undefined ? {} : { docsCommit }),
+            // Filed with the attestation, not the record: each report is one
+            // repository's run, and it is pruned or retained with that repository's
+            // answers rather than outliving them — the contract report under the
+            // same rule as the cucumber one.
+            ...(reports.results === undefined ? {} : { report: reports.results }),
+            ...(reports.contract === undefined ? {} : { contractReport: reports.contract }),
+        },
+    ].sort((a, b) => a.service.localeCompare(b.service));
+    const confirmed = claims.filter((claim) => claim.verdict === "confirmed").length;
+    const unconfirmed = claims.length - confirmed;
+    const unanswered = checklist.claims.length - claims.length;
+    // Everything the old record answered that the new one does not. The caller
+    // prints it; nothing here decides it is acceptable.
+    const discarded = (previous?.claims ?? [])
+        .filter((claim) => !byId.has(claim.id))
+        .map((claim) => ({
+        id: claim.id,
+        claim: claim.claim,
+        ...(claim.subject === undefined ? {} : { subject: claim.subject }),
+        reason: currentById.has(claim.id) ? "unattested" : "off-checklist",
+    }));
+    return {
+        verification: {
+            schema: 2,
+            feature: checklist.feature,
+            recorded,
+            checklist: checklist.digest,
+            summary: { claims: checklist.claims.length, confirmed, unconfirmed, unanswered },
+            claims,
+            attestations,
+        },
+        discarded,
+    };
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=build.js.map

package/dist/core/verify/build.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"build.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/core/verify/build.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAAA;;;;;;;;;GASG;AACH,OAAO,EAAkB,MAAM,gBAAgB,CAAC;AAChD,OAAO,EAAe,MAAM,cAAc,CAAC;AAC3C,OAAO,EAKN,MAAM,aAAa,CAAC;AAErB,MAAM,UAAU,iBAAiB,CAC/B,SAAoB,EACpB,OAAiB,EACjB,KAAa,EACb,OAAO,GAAoB,EAAE;IAE7B,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACpD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAoB,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE;QACzD,0EAA0E;QAC1E,2EAA2E;QAC3E,4EAA4E;QAC5E,uEAAuE;QACvE,sEAAsE;QACtE,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACzB,IAAI,CAAC,KAAK,SAAS;YAAE,MAAM,IAAI,KAAK,CAAC,0CAA0C,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACvF,0EAA0E;QAC1E,uEAAuE;QACvE,qEAAqE;QACrE,mCAAmC;QACnC,OAAO;YACL,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE;YACR,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI;YACZ,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK;YACd,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO;YAClB,WAAW,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW;YAC1B,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ;YACpB,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;SAClD,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACH,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;IACzE,OAAO;QACL,OAAO,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,OAAO;QAC1B,QAAQ,EAAE,KAAK;QACf,SAAS,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM;QAC3B,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,SAAS,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,SAAS,EAAE;QACrF,MAAM;QACN,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;QACrE,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,QAAQ,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;KAChF,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC;AA8CD,MAAM,UAAU,0BAA0B,CACxC,SAAoB,EACpB,WAAwB,EACxB,OAAiB,EACjB,QAA6B;IAE7B,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,GAAG,WAAW,CAAC;IACvE,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAChF,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAEjH,6EAA6E;IAC7E,mEAAmE;IACnE,8EAA8E;IAC9E,MAAM,kBAAkB,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,YAAY,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAC5F,MAAM,QAAQ,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE;QAChF,MAAM,OAAO,GAAG,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QAC1C,OAAO,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,IAAI,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,OAAO,IAAI,kBAAkB,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IAClG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACH,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,OAAO,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,EAAiB,EAAE;QAClD,yEAAyE;QACzE,0EAA0E;QAC1E,4EAA4E;QAC5E,sEAAsE;QACtE,uEAAuE;QACvE,2DAA2D;QAC3D,MAAM,KAAK,GAAG,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QACzC,IAAI,KAAK,KAAK,SAAS,EAAE,CAAC;YACxB,MAAM,IAAI,KAAK,CAAC,sCAAsC,MAAM,CAAC,EAAE,yBAAyB,CAAC,CAAC;QAC5F,CAAC;QACD,OAAO;YACL,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE;YACZ,IAAI,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI;YAChB,OAAO,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO;YACtB,KAAK,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK;YAClB,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO;YACvB,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,WAAW;YAC/B,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,QAAQ;YACzB,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;YAC3D,kEAAkE;YAClE,uEAAuE;YACvE,mEAAmE;YACnE,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,aAAa,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,aAAa,EAAE,MAAM,CAAC,aAAa,EAAE,CAAC;SACvF,CAAC;IACJ,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACH,MAAM,IAAI,GAAG,IAAI,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,QAAQ,EAAE,GAAG,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAChF,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE;QAChD,MAAM,MAAM,GAAG,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QAClC,IAAI,MAAM,KAAK,SAAS;YAAE,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;QACpC,yEAAyE;QACzE,iEAAiE;QACjE,OAAO,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,MAAM,EAAE,IAAI,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,IAAI,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,KAAK,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACvF,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAEH,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,YAAY,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,WAAW,EAAE,EAAE;QAClF,IAAI,WAAW,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,OAAO;YAAE,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;QAC/C,MAAM,GAAG,GAAG,WAAW,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CACnC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,OAAO,KAAK,WAAW,CAAC,OAAO,IAAI,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAC7E,CAAC;QACF,OAAO,GAAG,CAAC,MAAM,KAAK,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,GAAG,WAAW,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,GAAG,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;IACnE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IACH,MAAM,YAAY,GAAyB;QACzC,GAAG,oBAAoB;QACvB;YACE,OAAO;YACP,MAAM;YACN,QAAQ;YACR,MAAM,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,QAAQ,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;YAC3E,uEAAuE;YACvE,sEAAsE;YACtE,wEAAwE;YACxE,6BAA6B;YAC7B,SAAS,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM;YAC3B,GAAG,CAAC,UAAU,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE,CAAC;YACnD,iEAAiE;YACjE,wEAAwE;YACxE,qEAAqE;YACrE,iCAAiC;YACjC,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;YACrE,GAAG,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,QAAQ,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,cAAc,EAAE,OAAO,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,CAAC;SAChF;KACF,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,aAAa,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAErD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,WAAW,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;IACjF,MAAM,WAAW,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,SAAS,CAAC;IAC9C,MAAM,UAAU,GAAG,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC;IAE3D,2EAA2E;IAC3E,oDAAoD;IACpD,MAAM,SAAS,GAAG,CAAC,QAAQ,EAAE,MAAM,IAAI,EAAE,CAAC;SACvC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAE,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,IAAI,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;SACtC,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC,KAAK,EAAmB,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC;QAChC,EAAE,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE;QACZ,KAAK,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,KAAK;QAClB,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,KAAK,SAAS,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,OAAO,EAAE,KAAK,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,CAAC;QAClE,MAAM,EAAE,WAAW,CAAC,GAAG,CAAC,KAAK,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,eAAe;KACnE,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC;IAEN,OAAO;QACL,YAAY,EAAE;YACZ,MAAM,EAAE,CAAC;YACT,OAAO,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,OAAO;YAC1B,QAAQ;YACR,SAAS,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM;YAC3B,OAAO,EAAE,EAAE,MAAM,EAAE,SAAS,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,EAAE,SAAS,EAAE,WAAW,EAAE,UAAU,EAAE;YAChF,MAAM;YACN,YAAY;SACb;QACD,SAAS;KACV,CAAC;AACJ,CAAC","sourcesContent":["/**\n * Checklist plus answers becomes a record — once for a feature answered all at\n * once, once for a fleet answering service by service.\n *\n * The federated form is separate from `buildVerification` and not a flag on it\n * because the two disagree about what an unanswered claim means: answering\n * everything at once, a missing answer is a gap in this run, while a federated\n * record is assembled from attestations that each covered one service and were\n * never expected to cover the rest.\n */\nimport { type Checklist } from \"./checklist.js\";\nimport { type Answer } from \"./answers.js\";\nimport {\n  type ConsumedReports,\n  type RecordedClaim,\n  type ServiceAttestation,\n  type Verification,\n} from \"./record.js\";\n\nexport function buildVerification(\n  checklist: Checklist,\n  answers: Answer[],\n  today: string,\n  reports: ConsumedReports = {},\n): Verification {\n  const byId = new Map(answers.map((a) => [a.id, a]));\n  const claims: RecordedClaim[] = checklist.claims.map((c) => {\n    // Callers hand in an answer per claim — `runnerAnswers` is total over the\n    // checklist, and both other callers map the checklist to build theirs. The\n    // branch is here because the alternative to a diagnosis is a `TypeError` on\n    // `a.verdict`, which cli.ts reports as `internal` with a stack about a\n    // property of `undefined` and no word about which claim went missing.\n    const a = byId.get(c.id);\n    if (a === undefined) throw new Error(`buildVerification: no answer for claim ${c.id}`);\n    // Deliberately no `evidence_pins` here: the legacy all-at-once form binds\n    // to no commit, so there is no attested blob to pin — and none is ever\n    // handed in, because pins are computed inside the federated evidence\n    // validation this form never runs.\n    return {\n      id: c.id,\n      kind: c.kind,\n      claim: c.claim,\n      verdict: a.verdict,\n      answered_by: a.answered_by,\n      evidence: a.evidence,\n      ...(a.note === undefined ? {} : { note: a.note }),\n    };\n  });\n  const confirmed = claims.filter((c) => c.verdict === \"confirmed\").length;\n  return {\n    feature: checklist.feature,\n    recorded: today,\n    checklist: checklist.digest,\n    summary: { claims: claims.length, confirmed, unconfirmed: claims.length - confirmed },\n    claims,\n    ...(reports.results === undefined ? {} : { report: reports.results }),\n    ...(reports.contract === undefined ? {} : { contractReport: reports.contract }),\n  };\n}\n\n/**\n * An answer the previous record held that the new one does not carry.\n *\n * Dropping these is correct — see `buildFederatedVerification` — but doing it\n * silently is not: a schema-1 record answers the WHOLE checklist, so the first\n * federated write turns a green record into a partial one, and an operator who\n * is not told which answers went missing reads the drop as loam losing data.\n */\nexport interface DiscardedAnswer {\n  id: string;\n  claim: string;\n  /** The service the record filed it under, when it said. Absent in schema-1 records. */\n  subject?: string;\n  /**\n   * `off-checklist` — the feature changed and nobody asks this question any\n   * more. `unattested` — the question still stands, but no service attestation\n   * binds the answer to a commit, so it cannot be carried into a federated\n   * record; the owning repository has to record it again.\n   */\n  reason: \"off-checklist\" | \"unattested\";\n}\n\nexport interface FederatedBuild {\n  verification: Verification;\n  /** In checklist-independent record order — see {@link DiscardedAnswer}. */\n  discarded: DiscardedAnswer[];\n}\n\n/**\n * Replace one service's contribution while retaining current contributions\n * from other repositories. Claim ids removed from the live checklist are\n * pruned from both the answers and their attestations, so a changed feature can\n * never keep a green answer to a question it no longer asks.\n */\n/** One service's attestation: whose word it is, when, and against which commit. */\nexport interface Attestation {\n  service: string;\n  recorded: string;\n  commit: string;\n  reports: ConsumedReports;\n  /** The docs-repo HEAD the checklist was derived from, when git could answer. */\n  docsCommit?: string;\n}\n\nexport function buildFederatedVerification(\n  checklist: Checklist,\n  attestation: Attestation,\n  answers: Answer[],\n  previous: Verification | null,\n): FederatedBuild {\n  const { service, recorded, commit, reports, docsCommit } = attestation;\n  const currentById = new Map(checklist.claims.map((claim) => [claim.id, claim]));\n  const localIds = new Set(checklist.claims.filter((claim) => claim.subject === service).map((claim) => claim.id));\n\n  // An old all-at-once record remains readable, but its answers have no commit\n  // attestation and therefore cannot silently become somebody else's\n  // federated contribution. The first schema-2 write starts a clean federation.\n  const previouslyAttested = new Set((previous?.attestations ?? []).flatMap((a) => a.claims));\n  const retained = (previous?.schema === 2 ? previous.claims : []).filter((claim) => {\n    const current = currentById.get(claim.id);\n    return current !== undefined && current.subject !== service && previouslyAttested.has(claim.id);\n  });\n  const local = answers.map((answer): RecordedClaim => {\n    // Same contract as `buildVerification`: an answer is built from the live\n    // checklist, so it always names a current claim. Off-checklist answers do\n    // NOT belong here — `discarded` means \"an answer the PREVIOUS record held\",\n    // and routing an incoming stray into it would change what the printed\n    // notice tells an operator. A caller that reaches this gets told which\n    // answer it was rather than a `TypeError` on `claim.kind`.\n    const claim = currentById.get(answer.id);\n    if (claim === undefined) {\n      throw new Error(`buildFederatedVerification: answer ${answer.id} names no current claim`);\n    }\n    return {\n      id: claim.id,\n      kind: claim.kind,\n      subject: claim.subject,\n      claim: claim.claim,\n      verdict: answer.verdict,\n      answered_by: answer.answered_by,\n      evidence: answer.evidence,\n      ...(answer.note === undefined ? {} : { note: answer.note }),\n      // The pins the evidence validation stamped onto this repository's\n      // answers ride into the record here; retained other-service claims are\n      // spread whole below, so THEIR pins survive a re-record untouched.\n      ...(answer.evidence_pins === undefined ? {} : { evidence_pins: answer.evidence_pins }),\n    };\n  });\n  const byId = new Map([...retained, ...local].map((claim) => [claim.id, claim]));\n  const claims = checklist.claims.flatMap((claim) => {\n    const answer = byId.get(claim.id);\n    if (answer === undefined) return [];\n    // Normalize retained legacy entries to the current question text and add\n    // the subject schema 2 needs for future independent replacement.\n    return [{ ...answer, kind: claim.kind, subject: claim.subject, claim: claim.claim }];\n  });\n\n  const retainedAttestations = (previous?.attestations ?? []).flatMap((attestation) => {\n    if (attestation.service === service) return [];\n    const ids = attestation.claims.filter(\n      (id) => currentById.get(id)?.subject === attestation.service && byId.has(id),\n    );\n    return ids.length === 0 ? [] : [{ ...attestation, claims: ids }];\n  });\n  const attestations: ServiceAttestation[] = [\n    ...retainedAttestations,\n    {\n      service,\n      commit,\n      recorded,\n      claims: checklist.claims.filter((c) => localIds.has(c.id)).map((c) => c.id),\n      // What THIS repository answered, and what it answered it against. Both\n      // ride with the attestation rather than the record for the reason the\n      // reports do: they are one repository's facts, pruned and retained with\n      // that repository's answers.\n      checklist: checklist.digest,\n      ...(docsCommit === undefined ? {} : { docsCommit }),\n      // Filed with the attestation, not the record: each report is one\n      // repository's run, and it is pruned or retained with that repository's\n      // answers rather than outliving them — the contract report under the\n      // same rule as the cucumber one.\n      ...(reports.results === undefined ? {} : { report: reports.results }),\n      ...(reports.contract === undefined ? {} : { contractReport: reports.contract }),\n    },\n  ].sort((a, b) => a.service.localeCompare(b.service));\n\n  const confirmed = claims.filter((claim) => claim.verdict === \"confirmed\").length;\n  const unconfirmed = claims.length - confirmed;\n  const unanswered = checklist.claims.length - claims.length;\n\n  // Everything the old record answered that the new one does not. The caller\n  // prints it; nothing here decides it is acceptable.\n  const discarded = (previous?.claims ?? [])\n    .filter((claim) => !byId.has(claim.id))\n    .map((claim): DiscardedAnswer => ({\n      id: claim.id,\n      claim: claim.claim,\n      ...(claim.subject === undefined ? {} : { subject: claim.subject }),\n      reason: currentById.has(claim.id) ? \"unattested\" : \"off-checklist\",\n    }));\n\n  return {\n    verification: {\n      schema: 2,\n      feature: checklist.feature,\n      recorded,\n      checklist: checklist.digest,\n      summary: { claims: checklist.claims.length, confirmed, unconfirmed, unanswered },\n      claims,\n      attestations,\n    },\n    discarded,\n  };\n}\n"]}

package/dist/core/verify/checklist.js

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+/**
+ * The questions: what a feature's own artifacts promised, derived mechanically.
+ *
+ * The original plan was to extract C4 from the built code and diff it against
+ * the delta. There is no such extractor and there will not be one — nothing
+ * deterministic reads a service and says what its architecture MEANS, and two
+ * generated models of the same code disagree in wording every run, so the diff
+ * would flap and be switched off inside a week.
+ *
+ * What survives of the idea is the part that was always deterministic, and it
+ * is this module: a feature says this service will exist, it will expose this
+ * operation, that service will call it, this scenario will have a test. The
+ * list comes from the same files `validate` already reads.
+ *
+ * The claim ids are a function of the claim and of nothing else — so two runs
+ * are diffable, reordering the delta renames nothing, and rewording a scenario
+ * DOES rename its claim, because an answer about text nobody wrote must not
+ * carry over.
+ *
+ * `scenarioBodyHash` lives in `core/gherkin/digest.ts` — one recipe shared
+ * with `core/gherkin/stamp.ts`, which stamps the same digest as a tag on every
+ * generated scenario so `--results` can match a cucumber report back to a
+ * claim. A second spelling of the hash would silently stop every scenario
+ * claim from being answerable by a run.
+ */
+import { existsSync } from "node:fs";
+import { readFile } from "node:fs/promises";
+import { readAsyncapi } from "../asyncapi/read.js";
+import {} from "../c4/likec4.js";
+import { elementService, serviceResolver } from "../c4/resolve/service.js";
+import { ACTOR_KINDS } from "../vocabulary/maturity.js";
+import { operationIds, operations } from "../openapi/doc.js";
+import { featurePaths, featureSpecPaths } from "../repo/paths.js";
+import { locateServicePaths } from "../repo/service-target.js";
+import { featureSpecServices } from "../repo/repo.js";
+import { enumeratedServiceIds } from "../repo/service-target.js";
+import { FleetContext } from "../fleet-context.js";
+import { parseRequirements } from "../document/parse.js";
+import { scenarioBodyHash } from "../gherkin/digest.js";
+// The kind vocabulary and both hash recipes live in ./claims/identity.ts —
+// one module for everything that decides whether two runs ask the same
+// question, and this one for how the questions are derived.
+import { checklistDigest, claimId, DIGEST_LENGTH, ID_LENGTH, } from "./claims/identity.js";
+/**
+ * Derive the checklist from a feature's own artifacts. No code is read here and
+ * none should be: the whole design rests on the questions being computed from
+ * documents that do not change between runs.
+ */
+export async function featureChecklist(docsDir, featureDir, featureId, fleet) {
+    // The per-service loop below resolves living contracts through the
+    // enumeration twice per service; without a shared context each of those is
+    // a full fleet walk, so deriving one checklist cost O(services²) reads. A
+    // caller-supplied context is used when given; otherwise one is created for
+    // this derivation alone — the loop still pays a single walk either way.
+    const ctx = fleet ?? new FleetContext();
+    const seen = new Map();
+    const claim = (kind, subject, parts, text) => ({
+        id: claimId(featureId, kind, parts, seen),
+        kind,
+        subject,
+        claim: text,
+    });
+    const exists = [];
+    const exposes = [];
+    const declares = [];
+    const calls = [];
+    const scenarios = [];
+    const specServices = await featureSpecServices(featureDir, ctx);
+    // Architecture — what the delta promised the fleet would look like. Loaded
+    // through the context rather than a bare parse, so a caller that derives
+    // several checklists in one invocation (`loam gate`'s verification check,
+    // the fleet forms) shares one parse per delta — and a batch prefetch
+    // (`FleetContext.prefetchLikeC4`) genuinely seeds this load.
+    const deltaPath = featurePaths(featureDir).delta;
+    if (existsSync(deltaPath)) {
+        const res = await ctx.loadLikeC4(deltaPath);
+        // A delta nobody can parse promises nothing checkable. `validate` already
+        // reports it; inventing claims out of a broken document would only add noise.
+        if (res.errors.length === 0) {
+            const elements = res.elements;
+            for (const e of elements) {
+                if (!e.tags.includes(featureId))
+                    continue;
+                // A dotted id is a container INSIDE a service, and an actor is nobody's
+                // repository. Neither is a service that has to exist.
+                if (e.id.includes(".") || ACTOR_KINDS.has(e.kind.toLowerCase()))
+                    continue;
+                const svc = elementService(e);
+                exists.push(claim("service.exists", svc, [svc], `service '${svc}' exists`));
+            }
+            // The enumerated fleet — `services/` plus this feature's own `specs/`
+            // directories, the only place a service the feature INTRODUCES has a
+            // directory at all — rides into the resolver so a claim about an edge
+            // drawn into a modelled container names the service that owns it. A
+            // claim against a service called "api" that has never existed is one no
+            // evidence in any repository could ever answer, and the fleet half alone
+            // still derived exactly that claim for an introduced service's own
+            // container. Unenumerable services/ degrades to the feature's names.
+            const svcOf = serviceResolver(elements, new Set([...(await enumeratedServiceIds(docsDir, ctx)), ...specServices]));
+            for (const r of res.relationships) {
+                // Untagged edges are context for the diagram; an edge with no operation
+                // names nothing specific enough to look for in the code.
+                if (!r.tags.includes(featureId) || r.op === undefined)
+                    continue;
+                const from = svcOf(r.source);
+                const to = svcOf(r.target);
+                calls.push({
+                    ...claim("c4.calls", from, [from, to, r.op], `${from} calls '${r.op}' on ${to}`),
+                    // The same string as the provider's api.exposes token, scanned in the
+                    // CALLER's cited file — a call site plausibly spells the operationId.
+                    token: r.op,
+                });
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    for (const svc of specServices) {
+        const paths = featureSpecPaths(featureDir, svc);
+        // Contract — only what is NEW. A delta's openapi.yaml is a whole document,
+        // not a patch, so authors restate the living API inside it; asking whether a
+        // service still exposes what it already exposed is noise.
+        const featOps = (await operations(paths.openapi))
+            .filter((operation) => !operation.remove)
+            .map((operation) => operation.id);
+        if (featOps.length > 0) {
+            const living = new Set(await operationIds((await locateServicePaths(docsDir, svc, ctx)).openapi));
+            for (const op of featOps) {
+                if (living.has(op))
+                    continue;
+                exposes.push({
+                    ...claim("api.exposes", svc, [svc, op], `${svc} exposes operationId '${op}'`),
+                    operation: op,
+                    token: op,
+                });
+            }
+        }
+        // Events — the same NEW-only discipline on the async axis: a delta's
+        // asyncapi.yaml is a complete document too, so what the living contract
+        // already sends or receives is restatement, not a promise. Removals are
+        // not questions either — the reader already keeps marked declarations out
+        // of the sent/received sets — and an unreadable delta promises nothing
+        // checkable, exactly like the broken C4 delta above.
+        const events = await readAsyncapi(paths.asyncapi);
+        if (events.sent.length > 0 || events.received.length > 0) {
+            const living = await readAsyncapi((await locateServicePaths(docsDir, svc, ctx)).asyncapi);
+            const directions = [
+                { direction: "sends", feat: events.sent, known: new Set(living.sent) },
+                { direction: "receives", feat: events.received, known: new Set(living.received) },
+            ];
+            for (const d of directions) {
+                for (const name of d.feat) {
+                    if (d.known.has(name))
+                        continue;
+                    declares.push({
+                        ...claim("event.declares", svc, [svc, d.direction, name], `${svc} declares it ${d.direction} message '${name}'`),
+                        token: name,
+                    });
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        // Behaviour — the scenarios of the requirements this feature CHANGES. A BASE
+        // requirement is the living state quoted inside the delta, and a REMOVED one
+        // is being retired: neither is work anybody has to have done.
+        if (existsSync(paths.spec)) {
+            for (const r of parseRequirements(await readFile(paths.spec, "utf8"))) {
+                if (r.kind === "BASE" || r.kind === "REMOVED")
+                    continue;
+                for (const s of r.scenarios) {
+                    const body = scenarioBodyHash(svc, s.lines);
+                    scenarios.push({
+                        ...claim("scenario.tested", svc, [svc, r.id ?? r.name, s.name, body.slice(0, ID_LENGTH)], `scenario '${s.name}' of requirement '${r.name}' (${svc}) is covered by a test`),
+                        digest: body.slice(0, DIGEST_LENGTH),
+                    });
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        // The architecture spec axis, same walk: an arch scenario is a promise like
+        // any other — the outbox test nobody was going to write IS the point of the
+        // axis. The source file rides in the id tuple AND in the body hash itself
+        // (two axes are two namespaces: identically-worded scenarios must stay two
+        // questions, and the axis-salted digest is what keeps a business-only test
+        // run from answering the arch claim) and in the claim text, so the
+        // answering agent knows it is being asked for an integration/ops test, not
+        // an acceptance test.
+        if (existsSync(paths.archSpec)) {
+            for (const r of parseRequirements(await readFile(paths.archSpec, "utf8"))) {
+                if (r.kind === "BASE" || r.kind === "REMOVED")
+                    continue;
+                for (const s of r.scenarios) {
+                    const body = scenarioBodyHash(svc, s.lines, "arch");
+                    scenarios.push({
+                        ...claim("scenario.tested", svc, [svc, "arch.spec.md", r.id ?? r.name, s.name, body.slice(0, ID_LENGTH)], `scenario '${s.name}' of arch requirement '${r.name}' (${svc}, arch.spec.md) is covered by a test`),
+                        digest: body.slice(0, DIGEST_LENGTH),
+                    });
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    const claims = [...exists, ...exposes, ...declares, ...calls, ...scenarios];
+    return { feature: featureId, claims, digest: checklistDigest(claims.map((c) => c.id)) };
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=checklist.js.map