@xgent-ai/skills 0.6.0 → 0.7.1

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/203d98d7ffa51234d2a5d945c3dbb33cbd0df8610c54bb68275f09aea6569a5d

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+# New visual work
+
+Use this flow for a new surface or a replacement visual identity. PRODUCT.md owns product truth. DESIGN.md owns durable visual decisions. A surface brief keeps strategy that belongs to one route or artifact. Complete [init.md](init.md) first when PRODUCT.md is missing; a missing DESIGN.md does not route back to init.
+
+For a chosen comp’s region map, see [region-map.md](region-map.md) for the command sequence and schema.
+
+## 1. Decide what is already true
+
+Read DESIGN.md, representative code, tokens, components, and assets.
+
+- **Redesign:** preserve product truth, content, function, constraints, and explicit brand commitments; replace the old visual world rather than polishing it. The old look is evidence of what the subject is, not authority over what it becomes.
+- **Established world:** inherit it. A missing DESIGN.md does not erase a coherent identity already in code; document that identity instead of inventing a replacement.
+- **Incomplete brand:** preserve confirmed assets and recognizable traits, then expand the system with the user for this surface.
+- **No visual authority:** create a new world with the user.
+
+A section, component, feature, or state inside an established surface inherits that surface. Never turn a local addition into a new identity exercise.
+
+## 2. Ask what will change the work
+
+Before implementation, ask through the structured question tool when available only about material facts the original request, project sources and accepted brief do not settle. Group related gaps into two or three questions. An accepted direction and already authorized scope do not require another confirmation.
+
+- **Persuade:** who must act, what they should believe, which real proof, content, or assets earn that belief.
+- **Operate:** the task, information, important states, frequency, constraints.
+- **Read:** the reader's question, source material, structure, wayfinding.
+- **Experience:** what leads, how exploration unfolds, which interaction or transition matters.
+
+Across modes, ask what success looks like, what must remain untouched, and what would make a polished result feel wrong. Never ask for CSS values or canned aesthetic lanes.
+
+## 3. Choose the right amount of invention
+
+When continuing accepted work, first reuse the original direction for the explicit primary target. Read its path, hash and acceptance decision from context; continue with its settled product and visual facts without another interview or concept roll. A user request to change direction establishes new choice scope. Resolve stale, missing or ambiguous originals before using them. Profile advice and detector findings do not replace accepted decisions or frozen targets.
+
+Use the local catalog's actual available count. An insufficient catalog does not authorize inventing entries, card images or remote URLs. If the CLI is unavailable, read the original project facts and follow design-reference's source-backed direction work through available tools; disclose that the local roll did not run and preserve any unresolved choice.
+
+### Extend an existing surface
+
+Inherit its world and composition. Resolve only the new purpose, content, hierarchy, states, interaction, and how the addition joins the surrounding experience. No concept tournament, and no DESIGN.md change unless the user approves a durable system change.
+
+### Create a whole surface inside an established world
+
+Keep the visual system fixed. Derive five to seven materially different structures from the content, task, and user behavior, ordered by resonance. For a genuinely open whole page, screen, or flow, run:
+
+`.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui concept-seed --scope surface --mode <mode>`
+
+The script deals three of your structures; the dice pick which three reach the user, breaking the ranking rut while the user keeps a real choice. Present them on the decision page as full cards of equal salience, the dealt lead under kicker THE ROLL, with steer and re-roll; the user locks one. No canon card and no pick card at surface scope: the world is settled, so every card visualizes composition, not identity. With image generation and a comp-led default (`.phoenix-ui/config.json`; the build-path paragraph below), each card declares a `comp` under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/decision/`, generated after serving, in reading order, under [visualize.md](visualize.md)'s comp discipline and the MODE RULES block concept-seed printed for this surface. Anchor each comp on the established identity: pass a screenshot of a representative existing page as a reference image (the harness image tool's input image, or `phoenix-ui generate-image --ref`) with a prompt that leads with the new surface's structure and names DESIGN.md's palette, type, and component character; prose paraphrases of a design system drift, pixel references do not. Without image generation, or under a code-led default, each card carries a `wireframe` schematic (`phoenix-ui serve-question --schema`) the page draws itself. Locking a card is the approval and sets the build path: a locked comp builds comp-led with that comp as the approved comp, discharging [visualize.md](visualize.md)'s three-option round with no second approval point; a locked wireframe builds code-led, its ambition carried by the direction contract. Never run the script for a local extension or a precisely specified narrow request; shape those directly.
+
+### Create or replace the visual world
+
+1. Name the product's unique mechanism in one sentence, the audience's real scene, its cultural home, and what this first surface must prove. Note the page this category always ships and its predictable opposite; both are the rut, kept out of the seven-candidate list. A brief that paints its own picture, a product name, a titled artifact, a governing metaphor, adds its literal reading to the rut: spend at most one candidate on it and derive the rest from elsewhere in the audience's world.
+2. From that cultural world, list seven concrete visual systems, artifacts, places, or rituals the audience knows by heart, each with one line on why it resonates and can carry the mechanism, ordered by resonance. The audience's world includes its graphic and screen traditions, not only its physical objects: the notation, publications, identity programs, data graphics, and interfaces it reads daily. On an Operate or Read surface, the seven still come from anywhere in that world (its graphic traditions, places, rituals, and artifacts), never from the tools and instruments the audience operates: a terminal, a scope, or a control panel handed to a working screen comes back as a costume of that tool. A nameable abstract system (a school of poster, a documentation standard) is as concrete a candidate as any artifact. On a Persuade or Experience surface, also ask what this thing would look like as a physical object and what its world looked like before the web. Near-duplicates count once. When more than three of the seven share one material family, the derivation stopped at the subject's most obvious artifact; dig until the list spans at least three families.
+3. Turn that material into complete directions: each joins a reusable visual world to a concrete first-surface experience.
+4. When no accepted direction already applies, run `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui concept-seed --scope direction --mode <mode>` and follow what it prints. On a new or replacement world still awaiting a direction, writing artifact code before this script has run and its assignment is acknowledged is a contract violation, whatever the harness, the model, or the time pressure; the roll is what keeps every run from converging on the category default. The script assigns the direction to build and deals catalog challengers. Fuse each challenger before judging it: the challenger supplies the form and its system grammar, the product supplies every fact, clarity wins conflicts. Weigh fused challengers against the assigned direction on exactly two axes, audience identification and product clarity. Losing to strong grounded material is a valid outcome; beating a thin or tool-monoculture list is the point. Close with a verdict per challenger, decided before any borrowing: wins (beats the assigned direction on both axes; becomes the build candidate), competitive (holds one axis; stays a full alternate), or declined (loses both). A declined challenger is not spent: name the one discipline of its system the assigned direction lacks, and raise the assigned direction to match before presenting it. A donation transfers ambition and system discipline (a palette's total commitment, a grid's density courage, a form's structural honesty), never the challenger's clothes; a lifted motif is a costume note, not a raise, and one world owns the page. Write each raise into the presented direction as its own line, named for its donor; a raise nobody can read did not happen.
+5. Present one direction, fully committed and already raised by the hand it beat, raises visible as named lines: world, first viewport, visitor path, signature interaction, cross-surface reach, honest risk. Route each challenger by verdict: winning and competitive challengers are full alternates with their QUALITY BAR cards and one-line case; declined challengers render demoted, compact and quiet, each carrying its verdict and what the direction kept from it, never full-size, never silently dropped, still adoptable on request. The verdict informs the user's choice, never pre-empts it; the demoted row is the hand's proof of judgment. A hand holds at most three full-card challengers: when the roll deals more, the three strongest join and the rest wait in the re-roll pool, noted in one line; dropping a challenger from the hand itself takes a named product-truth failure, disclosed. Add one card for your own top-ranked grounded candidate when it is not the assigned direction, kicker IMPECCABLE’S PICK, same anatomy as every card, with an honest risk line naming its familiarity when true: the strongest grounded direction is often where most runs in this category land, and the user deciding that trade is the point of showing it. Familiar and effective is a legitimate destination, not a failure of nerve; the pick card and the standing exit serve it at two depths. One pick card, never two, never a ranked list: a lineup of your candidates hands selection back to a taste function and invites the safest card. The pick never takes the lead position; when the dice assign your top candidate there is no pick card, and the assigned card notes it topped your list. Add re-roll with an optional one-line steer, in three registers: plain (a fresh hand, same spread), safer (your remaining conventional grounded candidates plus the canon against named competitors), bolder (foreign forms only, at full commitment). The register is the user's steering on the familiar-to-bold axis, never yours to pre-select; when the answer carries one, re-run the seed with `--register <value>` and the next `--reroll` round, and follow what it prints. A user saying "bolder" or "safer" while a direction round is open means these registers, never the bolder or harden commands. The two channels share this structure and differ only in richness: cards and boards on the decision page, names and one-liners through the structured tool, whose option list carries the assigned direction, the pick, the winning and competitive challengers, and the standing exit last; declined challengers fold into the assigned option's description as their kept lines, so the raise survives the text channel.
+
+The standing exit: every direction round offers one quiet, permanent alternative, the category standard, played straight. It is the user's door, never yours: never recommend it, never weigh it against the roll, never let it soften the dealt directions; the counterweights bind the unchosen default, not the chosen one. When the user takes it (the canon action, a safer-steer, or plain words asking for the familiar or competitor-like path), convention becomes the commitment: ask once for two or three products this should sit alongside, make their craft level the bar, and execute the canon at full fidelity, without irony or smuggled quirk. Record a standing preference as a brand commitment in PRODUCT.md. Re-roll eliminates every direction already shown, grounded and challenger alike; after two consecutive re-rolls, ask what quality is missing. Re-roll on your own only on named factual grounds, when the assigned direction cannot carry the product's truth or task; taste is never grounds. The user may re-roll freely, and a user- or brief-pinned direction beats the roll, always. Resolve collisions field by field: preserve every user- or brief-pinned constraint. In dimensions the brief leaves open, the assignment still binds through its topology, controls, state vocabulary, and ritual; when only its materials conflict with a pinned visual direction or PRODUCT.md brand commitment, translate that material expression and name the translation in the presented direction. A look mismatch is not grounds to re-roll. Present the decision visually: write an options payload with the assigned direction leading, its raised lines included; the pick card when one exists; the dealt challengers as alternates with their QUALITY BAR cards, verdicts, and kept lines; re-roll with its safer and bolder registers; steer; canon enabled; and `buildPath` carrying the recorded default with `toggle: true` whenever image generation exists (details in the build-path paragraph below). A degraded roll with no challengers still uses the page, as a single text-only card with re-roll. Give every card the same anatomy: thesis, palette, materials, first viewport, honest risk, and the challengers' case lines (`--schema` prints the exact shape); the page renders identity from these fields, demotes declined challengers to their row on its own, and a challenger's catalog image rides as labeled inspiration, never the promise of the build. Author `canonCard` too: the category standard as one honest card, same anatomy; the page keeps it subordinate, and the counterweights still bind you. Run `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui serve-question --start --payload <file>` (`--schema` first for the payload shape). It daemonizes, prints the page URL and a key, and exits; open that URL for the user, in-app browser first, then the system opener, then showing the URL. Collect the choice with `--wait --key <key>`, repeating while it exits 3; the ANSWER prints as JSON. An ANSWER of `{"optionId":"reroll"}` keeps the server alive and the page open on a loading hand: rerun concept-seed with the same `--scope` and `--mode` plus `--from <seed-key> --reroll <n>` (1 on the first re-roll, counting up), build the next payload, deliver it with `--update --key <same key> --payload <file>`, then return to `--wait` on that key. Never `--start` a second server or fall back to chat here: either strands the open tab on a hand that never arrives. Exit 4 means the page closed unanswered: re-present once through the structured question tool, and with no answer there either, proceed unattended with the assigned direction and state the assumptions. A harness that can leave a shell blocked in the background may run the script without `--start` and let it auto-open and block. A harness that cannot hold a blocking `--wait` (it backgrounds long-running commands, or reaps a backgrounded child) takes the structured tool without starting the page and discloses the substitution in the first reply, so the tab is never left unanswered. Never predict any other fallback: run the script, and only exit code 2 from starting it, or that wait check before starting, routes the decision to the structured tool; those are the fallback, never an error to retry.
+
+When image generation exists, every card also declares a `comp` path under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/decision/`, the canon card included. Where the harness sandboxes its shell, start the page through the least-sandboxed command path it offers: a sandboxed shell cannot bind the board's port, and the first-attempt failure costs a retry every session. Serve the page first, then produce the comps; the page shimmer-waits per slot and the user may answer before they land. Load [visualize.md](visualize.md) before writing the first decision comp prompt, not at the comp round: each card's image is that direction's north-star comp at full fidelity under its comp discipline and the MODE RULES block concept-seed printed, and a prompt written before reading them misses every rule there: the requested surface as the real page, its first viewport and the start of the section below it, held like every comp to visualize.md's rule that a template skeleton stays the template whatever world paints it (your own pick included: a safe layout under a world skin is the template), structure-led prompt, real product name and real content, no invented commercial claims, in that card's own palette, type character, and material world, committed all the way. Once a round declares comps it has not generated yet, `phoenix-ui serve-question --start` (and `--update`, and a flip to comp) prints a `NEXT read <path>/visualize.md` line; read that file then, before the first prompt. `--wait` prints `COMP SIDECAR MISSING` for any landed decision comp with no prompt sidecar (the image's full file name plus `.json`: `a.png` gets `a.png.json`); write the missing sidecar before you continue. `COMP STALE` names a file an earlier round left at one of this hand's slots; regenerate it there. Generation takes the same time at any fidelity, so an unfinished draft pays comp cost for draft quality; fairness between cards is equal fidelity in each card's own grammar, one surface, one aspect, never shared unfinishedness. The frame's aspect is the surface's own: portrait at device viewport for a native app or mobile-first surface, landscape for desktop web; the decision page adapts to either, and a phone screen comped landscape is a broken frame, not a neutral default. Produce in reading order, the assigned card, then the pick, then the full-card hand, then canon, each file written with its prompt sidecar the moment it is done, so a re-roll's spend front-loads onto the cards read first; declined challengers get no comp, their catalog thumb is their face. With parallel subagents, fan out one agent per card: each spawn is the shipped asset producer with a single-comp packet, that card's fields, PRODUCT.md, the shared frame, the path to visualize.md for its comp discipline, the COMPS section of the MODE RULES block copied verbatim (the subagent never sees the roll's output), and the card's declared path, up to four in flight. Regenerate inline any slot still empty when its agent returns; drop without ceremony any slot still empty when the user answers. No other supervision is owed. Without parallel subagents, generate in the main thread after serving, same order, and let the harness's own generation display carry the progress; the wait for the answer follows the last file. The chosen card's comp is not spent by the choice: comp-led, it enters the comp round as compositional option one; code-led, it returns at the finish review as the critique reference, what the image dared that the build did not. Unchosen comps stay in `.phoenix-ui/mocks/decision/` as the round's spent hand; they carry no approval and imply none. With no image generation, cards carry their identity in palette chips and facts, and that page is complete, not a lesser version; the page then also demotes every challenger's catalog art to a labeled thumbnail on its own, because salience must encode the verdict, never the accident of which cards have images.
+
+The execution contract, comp-led or code-led, is a workflow preference, not a per-surface decision; no round asks it. The recorded default rides every round and the page's toggle handles the exception. Read the default from `.phoenix-ui/config.json` (`buildPath`), the gitignored `.phoenix-ui/config.local.json` winning where one machine differs from the team's committed value; with neither, comp-led is the default whenever image generation exists. Author every direction and surface payload with `buildPath: { "value": <default>, "toggle": true }`; the page renders a footer toggle with the trade stated beside it, and the ANSWER returns `buildPath` plus `buildPathFlipped`. A flipped value binds that session only and is never written back, with one exception, the only question this preference ever earns inside a round (init records it up front on projects that get the chance): when `buildPathFlipped` comes back true on a project that records no `buildPath` at all, ask once after the round closes whether to keep it as the standing default. Either answer writes `.phoenix-ui/config.json`; the answer picks the value, never whether to record one. Yes writes the flipped value; "no, just this once" writes the value they flipped away from, the standing default they just confirmed by declining. Ask on the flip, never on the untouched default: a user who left the toggle alone told you nothing. A declined offer nothing writes down is an offer the next session makes again. When the user asks in words to change the standing default, update the file without asking. **Comp-led**: the chosen card's comp is law, generated before building when it does not yet exist, and the finish review audits the build against it; boldest composition on the table, fix rounds expected, and the comp is non-optional, no silent skipping. **Code-led**: no comp of this page and no apology for it; the QUALITY BAR boards still calibrate finish, and the ambition moves into the written contract, the FIRST VIEWPORT block plus a named signature interaction and motion grammar, which the finish reviewer audits in behavior; code-led is not a discount on commitment. A code-led round still declares each card's comp path as a flip reserve: when the user flips the toggle to comp mid-round, `--wait` returns once with BUILD PATH FLIPPED while the page shimmers the slots; generate each open card's comp into its declared path then, lead first, and wait again. The flip back is free, and a comp that already rendered rides at the finish review as the critique reference. Without image generation there is no toggle and no choice: code-led is the only path, stated in one line rather than asked. The old two-card execution-contract round is retired; `followup: true` remains the general mechanism for delivering any later round over the same table via `--update`.
+
+Catalog worlds are working systems, not mood references. When one survives, carry its palette and material, type and composition, topology, controls and state, and responsive rules into the product, as far as the surface's mode allows. How far a source that is itself an interface language may carry its grammar is the mode's call, in the MODE RULES block. Open the QUALITY BAR board and hero for the world you build the moment the choice lands, even if you viewed another card earlier; the ANSWER line names the chosen card's images (when the harness only reads files or runs sandboxed, download them into the workspace and open the relative path; sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths outside it). They set the craft level the build must reach, a rendered reference's finish, commitment, and art direction, never the composition; your surface serves this product.
+
+Every direction the roll can land on must already be viable: every relationship and claim it visualizes true, a real palette and component family, a distinctive composition with one product-specific experience, workable at full-surface scale within the available assets, tools, and performance budget. A candidate that fails on truth is replaced before the roll, never rescued by it. Truth binds claims, not demonstrations: in greenfield work, author whatever illustrative material the concept needs at full fidelity, label it synthetic wherever a visitor could mistake it for the real thing, and hand the user the list of what to replace with real material. What stays uninventable are commercial and factual claims: prices, customers, benchmarks, endpoints, capabilities the product does not have. Refusing a bold direction because its demonstration data does not exist yet is the timidity reflex wearing honesty's clothes.
+
+What the opening must do, and how far the world may reach into the page, depends on the surface's mode. `concept-seed --mode <mode>` prints that mode's rules as a MODE RULES block, DIRECTIONS and COMPS; they govern every direction, card, and comp for this surface, and where they conflict with shared guidance they win. A session that reaches directions or comps without concept-seed having run (a direction the user or brief pinned) reads the mode's file instead: [mode-persuade.md](mode-persuade.md) for Persuade and Experience, [mode-operate.md](mode-operate.md), or [mode-read.md](mode-read.md).
+
+## 4. Commit the world
+
+Pick a color strategy before picking colors: Restrained (neutrals tinted from the world plus one accent; common on screens people operate or read, where the mode's rules still ask colour to do real jobs), Committed (one saturated color carries 30-60% of the surface), Full palette (3-4 named roles), or Drenched (the surface IS the color). Persuade and Experience surfaces have permission for the bolder strategies; take them when the brief allows. Color commits at page scale: fields that own whole regions, not accents scattered over a neutral ground. Dark or light is never a default: write one sentence of physical scene (who uses this, where, under what light) and let it force the answer.
+
+Choose faces like objects from the subject's world, in the mode's register. Operate and Read surfaces are well served by system stacks and workhorse UI faces; Persuade and Experience surfaces want faces with a point of view, and these training-data defaults mean you stopped looking: Fraunces, Playfair Display, Cormorant, Lora, Crimson, Newsreader, Syne, Space Grotesk, Space Mono, IBM Plex, Inter-as-display, DM Sans, DM Serif, Outfit, Plus Jakarta Sans, Instrument Sans. Naming one of these faces anyway requires a reason no other face could satisfy, and a subject association is never that reason: books wanting a serif, bookshops wanting hand-lettering, and tech wanting a mono are the associations the list exists to break.
+
+Calibration: AI-generated interfaces cluster around a few looks regardless of subject: warm cream ground, high-contrast serif display, and a terracotta or signal-red accent; near-black with one neon accent and glowing edges; broadsheet-editorial hairlines, italic display serif, and small tracked mono labels. All are legitimate when the brief calls for them. Where the brief leaves the aesthetic free, landing in one means the self-check failed: if someone could guess your aesthetic from the category alone, or from category-plus-avoidance, rework until neither answer is obvious. Energy is not the enemy of trust: a brief's negative constraints (no gamification, no hype) rule out those devices, not exuberance, and adjectives describing the product's behavior (quiet support, calm coaching) do not dictate the surface's energy. A bookish, warm, or child-facing subject does not soften the calibration: book cloth, thread, jackets, endpapers, and shelf ephemera span the whole saturated spectrum, and cream paper is the smallest corner of that world; landing on cream plus serif for a book subject is the default wearing the subject's clothes. A brief-pinned world pins the world, not its softest rendition: the pinned world's full material range stays in play, and a rendition matching what any model ships for that world failed the self-check at execution rather than selection.
+
+## 5. Record the decision
+
+When an original brief is already accepted, keep its format and body as the authority. If the user has authorized saving the decision or continuing implementation, record the primary target and acceptance reference in that original file, then run `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui surface-brief link <primary-target> <brief-file> --decision <acceptance-reference>`. The index stores only its path, full-file hash and decision, without another editable copy. Read context JSON back and verify its accepted status and hash. If the tool is unavailable, preserve the original and disclose that its mapping was not recorded. Conversation-only acceptance without a saved original cannot be claimed as recoverable.
+
+For a newly chosen direction with authorized persistence, before code record it as a development-only contract under `## Direction contract` in the original surface brief. A direction contract is durable route or artifact strategy, so create or update the brief even when no other surface strategy needs persistence. Use six short blocks, roughly 150 words; do not spend tool calls counting words. THESIS: the one idea this surface owns and the category-default arrangement it refuses. OWN-WORLD: the palette and component language, specific enough to be recognizable with all content removed. STORY: what the visitor understands, believes, and does. FIRST VIEWPORT: the exact composition, what is where and at what scale, and where the primary action sits. FORM: the chosen form, its position on your ordered list, and the seed key the script printed. Close with one more line, FINISH: the run's exit condition, verbatim "unreviewed and undocumented is unfinished; this build ends with the finish review, the verdict, DESIGN.md, and every shipping raster carrying its provenance". The surface brief is the reminder later agents reload across edits and sessions: a page that looks complete with the FINISH line undischarged is not done, it is abandoned at the finish line. If a block reads like a mood, the direction is not decided yet; the finishing review audits the render against this contract.
+
+Never copy the direction contract into implementation source or any browser-delivered artifact. This includes HTML or framework comments, hidden DOM, `<template>` elements, `data-*` attributes, rendered JSX or TSX output, serialized props or state, React Server Component payloads, client bundles, metadata or JSON-LD, accessibility-only text, and files served beside the artifact. A compiler or optimizer removing development metadata is not a safety boundary. Reviewers and documenters receive the contract from the surface brief.
+
+When the authorized scope includes documenting a new or replacement world, DESIGN.md is written at finish from the built world, following design-md and the shipped documenter (section 7); a rulebook written before the build gets defended against reality instead of describing it, and hands the design-system detector an unstable target. A new world shipped with no DESIGN.md is still an incomplete run. An ordinary extension does not rewrite DESIGN.md.
+
+Read the existing surface brief before updating it:
+
+`.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui surface-brief read <primary-target>`
+
+`.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui surface-brief write <primary-target> <body-file> [related-target ...]`
+
+After an authorized write, read the original once more and verify its target and accepted facts before building. A newly developed rolled direction uses the six contract blocks and actual seed key above; a reused original keeps its accepted structure and does not invent a seed key.
+
+Keep the brief small: scope and visitor mode; audience, job, action/task, proof/content, and constraints; chosen direction and memorable moment; unresolved decisions. Do not copy global product truth or DESIGN.md tokens into it.
+
+On a comp-led build whose comp still needs approval, whenever any image generation is available (a harness-native tool or the API fallback `phoenix-ui context` reports), the locked direction is visualized before it is built, never skipped: load [visualize.md](visualize.md) and follow it, three compositional options put before the user for approval, the chosen card's decision comp plus two variations. This step is proven to produce the most compositional and ambitious work. On a code-led build the comp round is skipped by contract, never by drift: the ambition it would have carried lives in the direction contract's FIRST VIEWPORT block and named signature interaction, and the finish reviewer audits those promises in behavior.
+
+For a planning-only `shape` request, return the selected direction to [shape.md](shape.md) and stop before implementation. Persist the original decision only when the user has authorized saving it or continuing implementation.
+
+## 6. Build with full commitment
+
+Build the assigned direction, not a safer interpretation of it. The form supplies structure, reading order, component conventions, and native motion; the product supplies every fact. Commit every atom: nav, buttons, inputs, and links are rebuilt in the form's vocabulary, and a stock component inside a committed form is a lapse. Land the first build fully committed; the passes that follow exist to make the committed thing clear and effective, never to dilute it. In unattended work, the safe rendition is the known risk.
+
+### Comp-led: the comp is a measured contract
+
+When an approved comp exists, it is a spatial contract, not a mood board: only the user can downgrade its authority, in explicit words. Models systematically believe their HTML, CSS, and SVG recreation of an image succeeded when it did not, so the build runs as a state machine on disk whose gates measure the screen against the comp instead of asking you to remember it. Start it once, and let it tell you what is next:
+
+`.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui build-phase start --direction <seed key> --kind <assigned|pick|challenger|canon> --artifact <entry file>` right after the direction choice (this is also the choice ping; the roll's output names the exact command), or `start --comp <approved comp> --artifact <entry file>` when a surface round already locked one.
+
+Then, in order, each closed by `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui build-phase advance` (every verb below runs as `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui <verb>`; exit 2 means the gate failed and printed why; fix that and advance again; write nothing for a later phase while an earlier gate is open):
+
+0. **comps.** The comp round from [visualize.md](visualize.md): three compositional comps of the requested surface at its own viewport under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/`, each with a prompt sidecar, put in front of the user; the chosen one's sidecar gets `"approved": true`. The gate counts them and reads the approval; a `start --comp` skips this phase because it already happened.
+The comp-led path is a frontier-tier job: it asks the builder to hold a measured layout, place plates at their boxes, and act on numeric readings across a dozen attempts. Smaller or faster models produce a recognisable page and stall under the hero gate; if the model in hand is one of those, say so before the direction round and take the code-led path, or expect the run to end at the hero with its readings unmet.
+
+1. **spec.** Measure the comp: `phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp> --grid` writes a coordinate grid over the comp; open it, name every salient region by grid span in a regions file (text and control regions narrow to an ink cluster only when it retains at least 95% of the span’s contrasting pixels; inspect the resulting crop, especially for compound controls and multiline text; `snap: false` keeps the span, and an explicit `box` is taken as drawn) (kind `plate` / `image` / `texture` for anything painted: every illustration, photograph, figure, product object, and material texture; `text` / `control` / `chrome` for what code draws; every region carries a `note` saying what the comp shows there, which the plate prompt and the gate messages read), and run `phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp> --regions <file>`. The spec carries each region's box, sampled palette, and medium; `phoenix-ui comp-spec --print` is the build's reference from here on. Type is measured, not guessed: `phoenix-ui font-match --measure <text region>` reads the comp's cap height, width class, and weight off the pixels, and `phoenix-ui font-match --rank <region> --text "..."` takes its candidates from a fingerprint index of the Google Fonts catalog (the nearest faces to the crop's shape) plus any names you pass with `--candidates`, renders them at that cap height with the region's words, and ranks them by fingerprint distance (its `USE` line is the CSS); with no browser resolvable it records the catalog's nearest face and says the size is estimated, which is still the choice to build on. Do not install a browser to rank, and never write a `chosen` face into the spec by hand: the gate accepts only what font-match wrote. The spec gate refuses to close until the lead text region is measured and ranked. A region note that describes painted material (a diagram, drawing, photograph, texture) under a code kind is refused at the spec: reclassify it as a plate, or reword the note if code really draws it. The script refuses a regions file that leaves comp ink unnamed: what is never named can never be missing. It also refuses a `text` / `control` / `chrome` region larger than a quarter of the comp: that is a column, not an element. Name each element inside it (`container: true` only when it truly is one undivided element). Anything drawn is a plate: an inline SVG past an icon's budget (a diagram, notation, leader lines with arrows, a "quick approximation" of the artwork) is refused at the hero; icon-sized SVG (under 64px, a few paths) is fine, and a chart the page draws from data at runtime is a chart, not an illustration. Callout lines and arrows that annotate a drawing belong to that drawing's plate, with only their labels set as text. Split regions by what varies independently, as [region-map.md](region-map.md) sets out; a framed view is a frame plate over its own image region. A crop of the comp is never a plate (the plates gate refuses a resample of the comp region); the crop is the reference the plate is generated from. A plate region's box has to hold its whole artwork with a margin: the spec measures the artwork's contact with the box edges and refuses a box that cuts through it (`bleed: true` only when the page really crops it there), because a plate placed with `object-fit: cover` on such a box shows the artwork minus the side the box lost. Anything not in the spec does not exist on the page: no borders, rules, containers, or chrome the comp does not show. Only three concessions exist: fonts (the closest obtainable face), icon glyphs (close enough, exact if the user chose an icon library; this covers the pictogram only, never a control's chrome, so a chevron, an arrow, a dropdown's border and fill, a button's shape are the comp's), and genuine defects in the comp such as spelling errors.
+Inspect the proposed map before producing assets: `phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp> --regions <file> --inspect-map` writes a numbered overlay, exact crops, foreground-mask previews, and a consolidated report without changing the spec or build state. Inspect boundaries and excluded pixels together; an empty reference needs corrected geometry. `parentId` names an enclosing `container`; it never removes regions or approves assets. The report diagnoses geometry, not semantic completeness.
+
+2. **plates.** Every raster region ships as a plate: an illustration, photo, or figure regenerated at asset resolution from its comp crop, UI text removed, at its `plate` path (isolated ink, figures, or objects use native transparent PNG so they sit on the page's own ground; photos and textures stay opaque); a texture (paper, cloth, grain) is a clean patch of the comp region mirror-tiled to size, generated only when no clean patch exists. `phoenix-ui comp-spec --crop <id>` writes the reference; save `phoenix-ui comp-spec --plate-prompt <id> --background transparent` to a prompt file for a cutout, or use `--background opaque` otherwise. Prefer the harness-native image tool with that crop and prompt, then `phoenix-ui embed-prompt <plate> --prompt-file <prompt.txt>`. The API fallback is `phoenix-ui generate-image --ref <crop.png> --prompt-file <prompt.txt> --out <plate.png> --size <WxH> --quality high --background transparent` (use `--background opaque` for full-frame assets); create the output directory first. Verify actual alpha, white foregrounds, fine edges, and clear holes on light and dark grounds; do not chroma-key native output. The plates gate scores the assets against the comp; also inspect placement and scale visually. With parallel subagents, spawn the shipped asset producer (`phoenix-ui-asset-producer`; `phoenix_ui_asset_producer` in codex; `/phoenix-ui-asset-producer` in Cursor; on GitHub Copilot say "Use the phoenix-ui-asset-producer agent") with the spec path and let it produce them all; without subagents, produce them here. A crop of the comp is a reference, never a shipping pixel. The gate checks every plate exists, is at least 1.5x the region's size, and reads as the region. Page code waits for this gate: a page written before its plates exist is a page that draws its material in CSS. A single-file deliverable changes nothing here: the plate is produced the same way and inlined as a data URI. `--force` exists for one case only, the user downgrading the comp's authority in words you quote in `--reason`; the script refuses every other reason. Score the plates before the review opens: once `build-phase advance` reports nothing but the pending review, run the plan and asset review in [component-review.md](component-review.md), where the user checks the plates and which regions code draws. A plate replaced after they accept needs a new round. No page code is written before they accept it; `build-phase advance` refuses until they do.
+
+3. **hero.** `phoenix-ui build-phase scaffold` first: it writes the measured layout as CSS custom properties (`.phoenix-ui/build/scaffold/layout.css`: `--r-<id>-x/y/w/h` in % of the comp, plus cap height, font-size, family, and weight where measured) and a reference page (`hero-reference.html`) with every region at its box and every plate placed. Bind the numbers to your own semantic structure, an element per region; the reference is a check on positions, never the page, and overlapping boxes are overlapping boxes. Then build only the first viewport, at the comp's own dimensions, the comp's words copied verbatim (the user approved that comp with those words; rewording is a stated decision after the hero passes, never a silent one inside it), every text region sized from its measured cap height and set in its ranked face (served from the project: put the face's font files beside the page and load them with `@font-face`, never a hosted font stylesheet such as fonts.googleapis.com or a font data URI, because the first-viewport capture allows fonts only from the page's own files and refuses any other host as an external dependency), plates first: place every plate at its spec box (`object-fit: cover`, an `<img>`, a background image, or an inlined data URI named for it) before any text or control, capture into `.phoenix-ui/review/hero-repro.png`, run `phoenix-ui build-phase record hero` once so you see the plate regions read as match before any text exists, then lay the semantic layer over the plates from the spec's palette and boxes and advance. The gate first refuses while any plate is unreferenced by the source, then runs `phoenix-ui comp-diff`, writes `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/hero/` (side-by-side, heatmap, one paired crop per region, `report.json`; `raw-report.json` preserves the uninterpreted measurements). The report and crop labels use the gate's verdicts; `gate.reasons` lists the remaining blockers even when a region is called drift. An accepted plate is revalidated if its file, measured region, or comp changes. The gate passes at 72% overall with no hard veto outstanding (a missing region, a contradicted plate or text block, an SVG illustration, a clipped plate, invented ink block at any score); above the bar, the numeric readings become advisories printed with the pass, and the polish pass before responsive is where they get fixed: the gate also reads each text region's cap height, line count, weight, ink colour, and position against the comp, each chrome strip's height off its rule, and the frame for ink where the comp is calm (a kicker, an extra nav item, a divider), and says each miss as a number ("cap height 78px in the build, 103px in the comp"); those numbers are the edit. When it fails, open the region crops it lists, in order, before editing: a region scored `missing` needs its material, `contradicted` needs its structure re-derived from the spec box, `drift` is where size and spacing edits belong; repeated attempts do not clear unresolved blockers. After three failed attempts, present the first-viewport review from [component-review.md](component-review.md) instead of iterating. Once the user accepts a first viewport, the overall bar, the palette check and every numeric reading are advisories while the capture still matches it; a missing or unreferenced plate, an SVG illustration, an organic clip, a clipped plate, invented ink and failed rendered presence still block. When the capture drifts from what they accepted, restore it: that review is closed and is never requested again. This is where the run's ambition is won or lost, and a retry here costs minutes where a rebuild verdict at the finish costs the run.
+4. **sections.** Build the rest of the surface inside the spec's system: the same corner language, line weights, and palette, and nothing the comp never shows. Where the comp does not cover a region, it inherits the recorded system.
+5. **motion.** The signature interaction, reveals, and motion, orchestrated once rather than scattered.
+6. **responsive.** The other viewports, and the first viewport at common desktop widths (1280 to 1600), not only at the comp's exact size: fluid columns, no fixed-pixel grid that wraps a hundred pixels narrower. Capture `desktop.png` (1440 wide, full page) and `mobile.png` (390 wide) into `.phoenix-ui/review/`; the gate diffs the desktop capture against the comp and refuses a first viewport that only held at the comp's width. A comp'd surface that is mobile-first was comped portrait; the plates were produced for that frame.
+
+### Code-led
+
+No comp and no apology for it: the ambition lives in the direction contract's FIRST VIEWPORT block and the named signature interaction, and the finish reviewer audits those promises in behavior. The chosen decision comp rides to the finish review as the critique reference.
+
+### Both paths
+
+- **The first viewport is a thesis, not a header.** Demonstrate the mechanism immediately, at the scale the form has in life; do not trap the concept inside a standard hero or card shell. The memory test: if someone left after one viewport, what would they describe an hour later? If the honest answer is a mood, the concept has not committed yet.
+- **Prove, don't claim.** Show the subject doing its job: the interface at work, the mechanism dramatized, specifics a competitor could not copy-paste. Demonstration data is design material: author it at full fidelity and label it synthetic; claims stay uninventable.
+- **Author the assets; never substitute chrome.** Great surfaces live on carefully made content: names, entries, copy, covers, thumbnails, textures. In greenfield work every blank the ask round left open is yours to author at production fidelity; content is authorable, claims are labelable, no section is omittable. Gradients, glass, generic icon tiles, and many-vertex `clip-path` polygons where an authored asset belongs are the gap wearing chrome; the detector flags the last two.
+- **Build the form's web leverage.** When the chosen world names a technique (canvas, WebGL, view transitions, generative motion), build the technique itself, not a static imitation of it.
+- **Pace the scroll like a studio.** Vary density, scale, image, motion, and quiet inside one grammar; a dense passage earns a quiet one, and the page ends anchored by a real close. One spacing rhythm throughout, with more space above a heading than below it.
+- **Use real, verified imagery when the brief implies it.** Search for the subject's physical object rather than the category; one decisive photo beats five mediocre ones. Verify stock URLs resolve.
+- **Author motion as material.** Give the page the form's native motion once, orchestrated, rather than scattered hover effects. Bound expensive effects and keep content visible by default.
+
+Preserve semantics, accessibility, performance, responsiveness, project conventions, and working behavior.
+
+## 7. Inspect and finish
+
+Inspect the surface's target sizes in one batched screenshot round: desktop and mobile on the web; on a native platform (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`), the shipped device classes per OS, captured from the simulator or emulator the way the platform reference's Verifying the build section describes. When the harness reports the user's actual viewport (an in-app browser's size, a named resolution), add that width to the set: the width that breaks is the one the user sees first. Critique the render against the user's request and the direction contract, fix material gaps, and confirm with one final round; two rounds is the ceiling, and fixes batch between them rather than earning per-tweak screenshots. On a comp-led build, run `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-diff --comp <approved comp> --build .phoenix-ui/review/desktop.png --spec .phoenix-ui/build/spec.json --out-dir .phoenix-ui/review/diff/final` and read its region rows and paired crops as the critique: the side-by-side is the view the build thread never has on its own, and a region it scores missing or contradicted is a fix whatever the page looks like from memory. Never judge fidelity from one full-page thumbnail; it hides exactly the failures that matter. On a Persuade surface, verify the mode did its job: a first-time visitor should know what this is, why it matters, and what to do within seconds, in the form's own vocabulary.
+
+A capture is evidence only when it is valid, and you validate before you send. Settle or disable entrance motion first: an element hidden by animation timing reads as a missing element and gets fixed into a regression. Capture full-page shots from the document top. Capture the comp comparison at the comp's own pixel dimensions. Then open every file once and confirm it shows what its name claims: no black or blank regions, no wrong section behind a right filename, no half-loaded state. A malformed capture sent onward costs the whole round; the reviewer answers it with `disposition: recapture` and nothing it reviewed binds.
+
+After the second inspection round the build thread's polishing is over: no further defect hunts, micro-edit scripts, or rebuilds here; whatever remains ships through the handoffs, where a fresh context does the finding better and cheaper. On the web, where this harness runs no design hook, run `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui detect --json` on the changed targets once here, fix what is mechanical, and pass the remaining findings to the reviewer; a hookless web build that skips this ships every tell the hook exists to catch. A native platform skips the detector entirely: it reads HTML and CSS and has no verdict on native code, so the reviewer's floor check is the only slop gate and the input packet says so. Capture the screenshots into `.phoenix-ui/review/`, one file per captured viewport (on the web, `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`, plus `user-<width>.png` whenever the user's viewport joined the inspected set; on native, one per device class, such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive), creating that directory when the harness does not; the paths you pass the reviewer are its spec, every viewport you inspected is named required in the packet, and that directory is where it looks when a passed path is missing.
+
+Then spawn the shipped finish reviewer, `phoenix-ui-finish-reviewer` (`phoenix_ui_finish_reviewer` in codex; `/phoenix-ui-finish-reviewer` in Cursor; on GitHub Copilot say "Use the phoenix-ui-finish-reviewer agent"), with the original request, confirmed answers, the artifact path, the screenshot paths, the direction contract, existing hook findings, the QUALITY BAR card and approved comp paths (a code-led build has no approved comp; the chosen decision comp rides in that slot as the critique reference, named as such), on a comp-led build the build state (`.phoenix-ui/build/state.json`), the spec, and the diff directories (`.phoenix-ui/review/diff/hero/` and `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/final/`, whose side-by-side, heatmap, region pairs, and `report.json` are the fidelity evidence), the craft-floor reference path, and on a native platform the platform reference path(s), [ios.md](ios.md) / [android.md](android.md), both on adaptive, plus one line saying no detector ran, so the reviewer judges in the platform's conventions rather than the web's. The reviewer has no browser; screenshots you fail to pass are checks it cannot run. Never read the shipped agents' definition files before spawning; the harness loads them at spawn, and you owe only the input packet. Wait on any agent with one long timeout rather than a loop of short polls, and spend the wait on the next independent step. Verify the return carries the five contract sections (a recapture return carries one, its recapture list); on an empty or thrashed return, respawn once with the same inputs. This review never runs inside the build thread and never inherits it: spawn the reviewer fresh, with no forked conversation history (`fork_turns: 0` in codex); a reviewer that inherits your transcript inherits your framing, your optimism, and your abstractions, and everything it needs travels in the inputs above. Only a harness with no subagent capability at all substitutes a fresh in-thread pass after stepping fully out of the build context, run from [degraded/finish-reviewer.md](degraded/finish-reviewer.md), and a substituted or failed-and-replaced review is disclosed in one line at finish, never silently.
+
+Act on the disposition word; there are exactly four. **recapture**: the evidence failed, not the build. Recapture what the return names under the capture-validity rules, then run a full review over the new evidence. A review conducted on invalid evidence binds nothing, and a verdict pass may never follow it. **rebuild**: fidelity failed wholesale, not in patches. Skip the fix batch and execute the rebuild immediately: re-derive the named regions, produce the named assets, and send the result back for a fresh full review, never a verdict pass; a rebuild replaces regions wholesale, so the whole matrix runs again over the recaptures. Tell the user what is happening rather than asking permission to fix a failure. Consult the user only on a second rebuild directive, both verdicts on the table, or when rebuilding would discard content the user approved. **ship**: nothing is owed; report the verdict at its scope and continue to the documenter. **fix**: apply the material fixes in one batch, rebuild once, and recapture the same viewports over the same files. A recapture measures positions, loading, and overflow; it cannot measure whether a fix reached the quality the finding named, so send the recaptured screenshots back to the same reviewer for a verdict scoring every material fix resolved, partial, or unresolved (through the harness's agent continuation; without one, run the scoring fresh from [degraded/finish-reviewer.md](degraded/finish-reviewer.md)'s Verdict Pass). Fixes scored partial or unresolved get another batch, recapture, and verdict. Two rounds is the budget an unattended run ends at; an attended session's ceiling belongs to the user, so when the second verdict still lists open items, put the table in front of them and let them choose between shipping as it stands and funding another round. Whoever decides, stop the moment a round resolves nothing, and the reviewer's findings are the only list you work from, never your own re-opened hunt. Do not run a second detector.
+
+A rebuild and a fix round share one asset rule: a raster either round creates or replaces is still asset work under [visualize.md](visualize.md)'s Produce section and keeps its **provenance** like every build raster, and a raster the round abandons is deleted in the same batch. Before either round's result goes back for review or verdict, run `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui embed-prompt --scan <asset-dir...>` over the directories the artifact's rasters ship from and clear every file it reports by embedding what it is missing: the exact generation prompt for a produced raster, the origin for a sourced, stock, or pre-existing one. The scan only reads; deletion is reserved for rasters the round abandoned, never for a file the scan flagged.
+
+Report the final verdict under the reviewer's own disposition word and at its actual scope. A verdict pass scores the listed fixes and nothing else: "the reviewer scored all three fixes resolved" is a claim it supports, "no material issues remain" is not. A table with open material findings is never announced as a pass, never softened, and never dressed as whole-surface approval when only a fix list was scored. When the user answers a ship with evidence against it, their own screenshot, a named mismatch with the comp, that evidence outranks every capture you made: put their material in the packet and spawn a fresh reviewer for a new full review. Patching inline and self-certifying is how a rejected page ships twice.
+
+After the last correction, spawn the shipped documenter, `phoenix-ui-documenter` (`phoenix_ui_documenter` in codex), with the project root, artifact path, direction contract, PRODUCT.md, [document.md](document.md), and write boundary. Without subagents, load [degraded/documenter.md](degraded/documenter.md) and [document.md](document.md) before writing. Verify the outcome: new worlds and approved system changes require token-bearing DESIGN.md **and** `.phoenix-ui/design.json`, not prose alone. Ordinary extensions compare the finished build against the incumbent system, preserve its files, and report the evidence checked; report pre-existing drift without repairing it unasked. Recheck after later edits. Finish only when review and documentation are complete.
+
+On a comp-led build, record the final review disposition with `.vibe/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui build-phase finish --disposition <ship|fix|rebuild|recapture>` before the final response. A refused `ship` is an unfinished build; report the outstanding phase with the verdict.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/20b9a79995a021b269065159c61a20a4674fd501b35cc899a7ad15ef7d81d3da

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+> **Additional context needed**: the brand's emotional range.
+
+Make the experience memorable at moments that earn it. Delight is not a layer of generic whimsy; it is product character revealed through a useful interaction, a humane response, or an unexpectedly considered detail.
+
+---
+
+## Visitor mode
+
+- **Persuade + Experience:** personality may run through voice, composition, motion, and discovery, provided the artifact remains the focus.
+- **Operate + Read:** concentrate delight at meaningful moments such as first use, completion, recovery, or mastery. Reliability carries everything else.
+
+## Find the opportunity
+
+Inspect the target, DESIGN.md, product voice, repeated-use frequency, and emotional context. Look for:
+
+- effort worth acknowledging;
+- waiting that can become informative;
+- an empty or first-use state that can orient;
+- an error or recovery moment that needs empathy;
+- an interaction whose physical or verbal response could express the brand;
+- a useful capability people might enjoy discovering.
+
+Do not manufacture a celebration for an ordinary click. Ask only when the brand's emotional range or the stakes cannot be inferred.
+
+## Define one delight thesis
+
+State in one sentence what the user should feel and why that feeling belongs to this product. Then choose the smallest system that can deliver it:
+
+- a distinctive response to a meaningful action;
+- product-specific language that clarifies while carrying voice;
+- an interaction or transition with a recognizable material behavior;
+- an illustration, sound, haptic, or environmental detail grounded in the product world;
+- a discovery reward that reveals real utility.
+
+Derive the treatment from product mechanism and visual world, not a stock catalog.
+
+## Build for the emotional moment
+
+- **Success:** match the response to the effort and consequence. Major milestones can expand; routine saves should simply feel certain.
+- **Waiting:** show truthful progress, useful context, or product-specific activity. Never fake work or delay completion to stage a flourish.
+- **Empty and first use:** make the next action clear before adding personality.
+- **Error and recovery:** lead with the problem and recovery. Warmth may reduce stress; jokes must not trivialize loss, money, privacy, or blocked work.
+- **Repeated interaction:** keep the response satisfying after the hundredth use. Variation is useful only when it remains coherent and predictable enough to trust.
+- **Discovery:** reward curiosity without hiding required functionality.
+
+Copy must use the product's language. Generic whimsy is worse than neutral clarity.
+
+## Protect the experience
+
+Delight must not:
+
+- delay, block, or obscure the primary task;
+- override platform conventions or accessibility;
+- add unrequested factual claims;
+- play sound without consent or ignore mute settings;
+- become mandatory, unskippable, or exhausting on repeat;
+- add a dependency or asset cost disproportionate to the moment.
+
+For authored motion, load [animate.md](animate.md). Respect screen readers, keyboard use, touch, localization, and cultural context. Nonessential loops stop when hidden. Make celebration intensity proportional to frequency and consequence.
+
+## Verify
+
+- The moment is specific enough that a neighboring product could not use it unchanged.
+- It improves comprehension, confidence, motivation, or emotional recovery.
+- The interface remains fast and obvious without the flourish.
+- Repetition does not turn charm into friction.
+- Muted, keyboard, touch, and localized paths work.
+- The result feels like the selected world, not a generic “delight” treatment.
+
+When the personality feels earned, hand off to `$phoenix-ui polish` for the final pass.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/2143c1b2a5587f8962b27c3d7511b38aa8f54484914d550761193cd1f144506c

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env node
+'use strict';
+
+const path = require('node:path');
+const { main, shellQuote } = require('./phoenix-bootstrap.cjs');
+const provider = "qoder";
+process.env.PHOENIX_UI_PROVIDER_ID ||= provider;
+main(process.argv.slice(2), {
+  skillDir: path.resolve(__dirname, '..'),
+  self: `node ${shellQuote(__filename)}`,
+}).then(code => { process.exitCode = code; }).catch(error => {
+  process.stderr.write(`Phoenix UI: ${error.message}\n`);
+  process.exitCode = 4;
+});

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/21517357319f746b30b002dfe7a9beea61d50fcacc77ad12dfa4f3f4281a4f92

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+Layout turns product priority into reading order, grouping, rhythm, and usable space. Diagnose the structural problem before moving boxes.
+
+---
+
+## Visitor mode
+
+- **Persuade + Experience:** composition may be asymmetric, fluid, or intentionally disruptive when the selected world earns it.
+- **Operate + Read:** predictable structure, stable density, and navigable linearity are affordances.
+- **Native:** follow [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md) for navigation, insets, adaptation, and touch targets.
+
+Preserve the established visual world. A layout command changes structure inside it; identity replacement belongs to [new-work.md](new-work.md).
+
+## Two isolated assessments
+
+When a sub-agent tool is available and permitted, run these independently; otherwise run them yourself in this order.
+
+1. **Layout assessment:** inspect representative states and viewports. Answer every question below with rendered or source evidence:
+   - **Reading order:** Apply the squint test. With detail blurred, can you still identify the primary element, the secondary element, and the major groups in order?
+   - **Grouping:** Are related items close and distinct groups separated, or are containers compensating for weak proximity?
+   - **Rhythm:** Do tight and generous intervals create a deliberate cadence, or is one spacing value repeated until everything has equal weight?
+   - **Structure:** Does the topology match the content and task? Are repeated cards, columns, or sections genuinely equivalent, or merely a framework default?
+   - **Density:** Does the amount of information per region fit use frequency, decision complexity, and visitor mode?
+   - **Adaptation:** At narrow, intermediate, wide, zoomed, and localized states, what reorders, collapses, wraps, scrolls, or remains fixed? Does DOM and focus order still agree with the visual order?
+   - **Extremes:** Do long content, empty states, overlays, sticky elements, safe areas, and small touch targets expose structural failures?
+2. **Mechanical scan:** run:
+
+```bash
+.kiro/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui detect --json --scope layout [target files or dirs]
+```
+
+Also inspect arbitrary spacing, overflow, stacking, and container behavior the detector cannot resolve. Keep mechanical evidence out of the first assessment, then synthesize both passes before editing. A clean scan cannot prove hierarchy or rhythm.
+
+## Set the spatial thesis
+
+Before editing, name:
+
+- the primary reading or task path;
+- what belongs together and what must separate;
+- which element leads and which supports;
+- the intended density and spacing rhythm;
+- how the structure changes across containers, viewports, input modes, and content extremes.
+
+Choose the simplest structural model that expresses those relationships. Use layout primitives according to the relationships they control, and name reusable spacing and container roles semantically.
+
+## Apply
+
+- Group by meaning. Use proximity before adding containers or decoration.
+- Create rhythm through deliberate contrast between tight and generous intervals.
+- Use a documented spacing scale rather than one-off values. A 4-unit base usually provides the useful middle steps that an 8-only scale misses.
+- Let hierarchy follow product priority, not framework defaults.
+- Keep distinct content visually distinct without turning every group into an isolated component.
+- Make responsive behavior structural: reorder, collapse, reflow, or reveal based on what remains important.
+- Prefer container-aware components when the same component appears in different contexts.
+- Use `gap` for sibling rhythm when it expresses the relationship more directly than child margins.
+- Keep touch targets usable even when their visible marks are small.
+- Use depth only when it clarifies state or hierarchy.
+- Make optical corrections only after inspecting the rendered result.
+
+Variation is not a goal by itself. Repetition should support recognition; break it only when content or priority changes.
+
+## Verify
+
+- The squint test still reveals the primary, secondary, and major groups in order.
+- The reading and task path remains clear at every supported size.
+- Related content groups naturally; unrelated content does not blur together.
+- Tight and generous spacing create intentional rhythm instead of monotonous repetition.
+- Density matches use frequency and content complexity.
+- Long text, empty states, localization, zoom, and dynamic content do not break the structure.
+- Keyboard, touch, and assistive-technology order agree with the visual order.
+- The final mechanical scan has no unexplained findings.
+
+Answer each item with rendered or source evidence, then rerun the scan. Do not substitute a bare “yes” for verification.
+
+When the structure holds, hand off to `/phoenix-ui polish`.
+
+## Live-mode signature params
+
+Every variant declares a coarse `density` parameter and authors spacing against `var(--p-density, 1)`.
+
+```json
+{"id":"density","kind":"range","min":0.6,"max":1.4,"step":0.05,"default":1,"label":"Density"}
+```
+
+Add one structural parameter only when the topology genuinely branches. Follow [live.md](live.md)'s parameter contract.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/21b11e8c121629b91e130a3f01e82f66f97e4ddbf5c8d65ff6eb1308c904fdc9

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# Plan and asset review
+
+Use this checkpoint on comp-led builds once every raster region has its plate and the plates gate has scored them, before any page code exists. The approved comp is the reference. The user reviews two things: the plates that will ship, and the production plan for everything else, meaning which regions code draws. A painted region planned as code is the most expensive mistake a comp-led build makes, and this is where the user catches it. Text, controls and chrome are judged later, in the assembled first viewport.
+
+## Plan, capture, serve
+
+Run `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review plan`. It writes `.phoenix-ui/review/components.json` from the measured spec, the comp and the plate files, and refuses, naming each one, while any raster region lacks its plate. Never write or edit that file for this stage: the packet is derived from the spec, so every change belongs in the regions file.
+
+If the harness exposes `component_review`, call it with `manifest_path` set to `.phoenix-ui/review/components.json`. The host captures, presents the review and returns the user's decisions. A suspended request is waiting for the user; it is not a failed build or an approval.
+
+Otherwise run `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review capture --manifest .phoenix-ui/review/components.json`, then start `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review serve --session <returned session>` in the background. Open the URL it prints in the available browser and wait for the user; `serve` exits 0 once they submit. Read the decisions with `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review status --session <id>`; `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui component-review verify --manifest .phoenix-ui/review/components.json` confirms approval and refuses pending, needs-work and stale input. Never submit the page or write a receipt on the user's behalf.
+
+`serve` exits 2 when this session has no browser (the same signal as the decision page) and 4 when it closes after 30 idle minutes without a decision. Either way no one is reviewing: stop waiting, do not approve anything yourself, and do not build past this checkpoint. End the run and report the plan and asset review as pending with its session ID, so the user can resume it. A waiting review is pending work, not a completed build.
+
+## Act on the receipt
+
+Apply the user's decisions as given, never your own favorable verdict in their place.
+
+- **approve**: once every item is approved and the inventory is confirmed, advance to the hero.
+- **revise** (a plate): regenerate that plate at the same path with the user's feedback.
+- **revise with split** (an asset): replace that region in the regions file with its layers: a frame plate with a transparent opening (kind `plate`, same box), the content as its own `image` region at the opening's box, and each moving part (a shutter, a door) as its own plate. Name each layer after the original region, as `<id>-frame`, `<id>-view` or `<id>-shutter-left`, so the next round shows it as part of the user's request. Rerun `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>` and produce the plates.
+- **revise** (a plan item): change the regions file as the feedback says (resize or extend a raster region, split material into its own plate region, or adjust the code region), rerun `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce any new plates.
+- **reclassify** (a code region): in the regions file, change that region's `kind` to the one the user chose and rewrite its `note` to describe the material. Rerun `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, then produce the new plates, with the asset producer when subagents are available.
+- **missing**: add the region to the regions file, rerun `.cursor/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce its plate if it is raster.
+
+Then run `plan`, `capture` and `serve` again. Unchanged decisions carry over, so the user sees only what changed. Any spec change, or a plate replaced after acceptance, needs a new round; the build-phase gate stays closed until the review of the current spec is accepted.
+
+## Assemble and review
+
+Build the first viewport from the approved plates and plan, and run the hero gate. Human review does not waive its integrity checks. After three failed hero attempts, stop iterating and present the first-viewport review with the current build; the user's eye settles what the readings could not.
+
+Present a second manifest at `.phoenix-ui/review/hero.json`. You write this one, and its shape is fixed:
+
+```json
+{
+  "schemaVersion": 2,
+  "stage": "hero",
+  "id": "hero",
+  "title": "First viewport",
+  "comp": {"path": ".phoenix-ui/mocks/comp.png", "width": 1536, "height": 1024},
+  "components": [{
+    "id": "first-viewport",
+    "name": "First viewport",
+    "medium": "HTML / CSS",
+    "note": "Assembled first viewport",
+    "box": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1},
+    "preview": {"kind": "page", "path": "index.html"},
+    "dependencies": ["styles.css", "assets/plates/sky.png", "fonts/display.woff2"]
+  }]
+}
+```
+
+- `schemaVersion` is 2. Version 3 is the plan review packet and requires stage `components`. `codeRegions` and `specSha256` exist only in version 3 and are refused here. `reviewGroup` is refused too: version 3 rejects it, and any other version accepts it only on a page preview in a `components`-stage manifest, never in a hero manifest.
+- `comp.path` is the `comp` value in `.phoenix-ui/build/spec.json`, and `width` and `height` are that PNG's pixel size.
+- Exactly one component, with `box` exactly `{"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1}` and `name`, `medium` and `note` as strings.
+- `preview.path` is the page entry the build gates (`artifact` in `.phoenix-ui/build/state.json`).
+- `dependencies` lists every other file the page loads (stylesheets, scripts, plates, images, fonts) as bare strings. Every path, here and above, is project-relative and plain: no leading `./` or `/`, no `..`, no URL, no `?`, `#`, `%`, `:` or backslash. A request to a file missing from this list, or to another host, fails the capture.
+
+The reference stays the approved comp. Call the same host review tool, or run `capture`, `serve` and `verify` with this manifest. Needs-work feedback starts another assembly round.
+
+Acceptance closes human review for this build: never request plan, asset or assembly approval again. While the page renders what the user accepted, the hero score, the palette check and every numeric reading are advisories; material vetoes still hold (a missing or unreferenced plate, an SVG illustration, an organic clip, a clipped plate, invented ink, failed rendered presence). When the capture no longer matches the accepted screenshot, restore what the user accepted; until then the readings apply. Complete the rest of the page, responsive behavior, finish checks and documentation with the accepted first viewport as the visual direction. This is first-viewport calibration, not a claim that the user reviewed the rest of the page. Shared stylesheet edits do not reopen approval. Preserve the accepted direction; a later explicit user change is a new task.
+
+Assembled-page capture executes inline and declared local scripts from the pinned inputs. Network APIs, frames and workers are unavailable; the initial viewport must settle before capture. Keep the real page and declare its scripts rather than removing behavior to pass review.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/22546c58d9e4f57925aab6df4fdfab85d1e985f92489ea869ab6b2b8d76e0b91

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+name = "phoenix_ui_finish_reviewer"
+description = "Reviews a finished Phoenix UI build against its direction contract, the approved comp, and the chosen world's quality bar, returning an ordered list of material fixes."
+model_reasoning_effort = "high"
+nickname_candidates = ["Finishing Eye", "Contract Judge", "Ceiling Check"]
+developer_instructions = '''
+# Phoenix UI Finish Reviewer
+
+You are the finishing reviewer for an Phoenix UI build: fresh eyes on a done artifact, outside the build thread's attention gravity. You edit nothing; the parent applies your fixes.
+
+You have no browser. Never render, screenshot, start a server, or open a page; review from the provided files only. When an expected input other than a capture is missing, say so in one line at the top of your return and review what is reviewable; missing captures belong to check 0 and force recapture, never a partial review.
+
+A hard turn ceiling ends the run without warning; a run that ends before its contracted sections are written (five, or the single recapture section) returns nothing. Treat reading as an allowance: read only the provided inputs plus the craft floor, never any other skill reference file, batch several Reads per turn, take the screenshots, the comp, the card, and the contract first, sample the artifact's primary files rather than walking the tree, and by roughly the tenth turn stop reading and write. Name whatever went unread in the line above the sections.
+
+## Input Contract
+
+Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); the screenshots the parent captured, in `.phoenix-ui/review/` (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: device-class names such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive). A screenshot path the calling brief names is authoritative when the file exists; `.phoenix-ui/review/` is where to look when the brief names none or a named path is missing, never a filename you invent. Also expect: the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); the PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths; on a comp-led build the approved comp path (a code-led build has none; it passes the chosen decision comp as a separate critique-reference input, labeled as such, and nothing here that binds "the approved comp" binds it); on a comp-led build the build state (`.phoenix-ui/build/state.json`), the measured spec (`.phoenix-ui/build/spec.json`), and the diff directories `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/hero/` and `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/final/` (each holds `side-by-side.png`, `heatmap.png`, `regions/<id>.png` paired crops, and `report.json` with per-region scores and verdicts from `phoenix-ui comp-diff`); and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. On a native (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) build the packet adds the platform reference path(s) (`reference/ios.md` / `reference/android.md`) and a line saying no detector ran: read the platform reference alongside the craft floor, judge every check in the platform's own conventions, treat the screenshots as device captures, and know your floor check is the build's only slop gate. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
+
+## Checks, in order
+
+0. **Evidence.** Before any other check, verify the required captures exist and every capture is valid. Required: the platform's full viewport set (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: one capture per shipped device class), plus every capture the calling brief names as required, a reported user viewport (`user-<width>.png`) included. Valid: no black or blank regions, content matching what the filename claims (a visit capture showing the About section is invalid), the document top visible where the file claims a full page, dimensions that make sense for the named viewport. A required capture that is absent fails exactly like one that is malformed: a viewport nobody captured is a viewport nobody inspected, and it cannot ship. When any capture fails, the whole review changes shape: return `disposition: recapture` as the first line, then one section, `recapture`, listing each missing or invalid file and what a valid capture of it shows, and stop. Never build a matrix on malformed evidence; a verdict derived from a broken capture launders the breakage into an approval, and the parent owes you a full re-review on valid captures, not a scoring round.
+1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. On a comp-led build, `.phoenix-ui/build/state.json` exists and every phase before `review` is `closed` or explicitly `skipped`; an open or failed phase is a material finding. A comp-led config with no state file, or a state whose `comps` phase is neither `closed` nor `skipped`, means the comp round was skipped and the build ran from a world description alone, a material finding that outranks craft; a phase closed with a `forced` record is disclosed as a material finding unless the user downgraded the comp in words the packet quotes; a state file whose `hero.gate.score` sits under 0.72, or a missing state file, means the reproduction ran unproven, a material finding, and `.phoenix-ui/review/hero-repro.png` must exist either way. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comp-round comps exist under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/`, an approval record exists too: the surface brief naming the approved comp, or an `approved` flag in its sidecar. Comp-round comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, a material finding. Files under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/decision/` are exempt: they are the direction round's dealt hand, produced before any comp round, and imply no approval whatever the build path; a code-led build has no comp round at all.
+2. **Fidelity.** Start from the measurement, then judge what it cannot: read `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/final/report.json` (and hero) first; every region scored `missing` or `contradicted` is a matrix row in that state unless the paired crop under `regions/` shows the score is wrong, and you say why; a region scored `match` still gets your eye for lettering character and material, which the numbers do not measure. Then, against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, the primary action's treatment (a CTA the comp physically works, dissolves, or stamps is a signature element; its plain-rectangle rendition is contradicted), navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Three rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement; medium is part of the promise. GROUND: the page field's value and temperature against the comp's, sampled from pixels on both sides when tooling allows rather than judged from memory, and read as the net on-screen result where a texture or tile paints over the base color; a ground warmer or cooler than the comp's is contradicted however faithfully the layout matches, and drift toward the rendition prior (warm cream on light grounds, blue-black slate on dark) is the direction to hunt. With no approved comp, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality (CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never renders) as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. GROUND narrows rather than lapses: with no comp to sample, a color OWN-WORLD names is the target and the same warmer-or-cooler judgment applies; when OWN-WORLD names none, there is no GROUND authority, and the review says so in place of a verdict, because a target the reviewer invents turns the check into taste. A critique-reference comp on such a build is provocation, not spec: no element matrix, no adaptation citations, no asset obligations; its one contribution is what the image dared that the build did not, and dares worth adopting enter material_fixes as ordinary ordered fixes. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. A fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
+3. **Ceiling.** Against the QUALITY BAR card: name the world's native devices the build left unused, frame, depth, lettering treatment, ornament density, motion. The card governs commitment and finish, never composition.
+4. **Contract, promise by promise.** First verify FORM carries the seed key the concept roll printed; a contract with no seed key, or one the parent cannot corroborate, means the roll was skipped, a material fix ahead of any craft point. Then, for each of the five blocks: does the render keep the promise? Apply the memory test to the first viewport.
+5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every raster region of the spec shipped as its plate (the spec names the file; the page references it; the region's diff row is not `missing`), not a gradient, an inline SVG, or a many-vertex `clip-path` standing in for it, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind a wash is a compliance token, not a shipped material, and the detector's `buried-raster` and `organic-clip-path` findings in the packet are material fixes.
+6. **Floor.** Read the craft floor's Refuse list and hold the screenshots against it: kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces, gradient text, side stripes, and the rest. A banned element is a material fix even when it matches nothing in the comp: the builder loaded the same ban before writing it, and fidelity to a comp cannot authorize what the floor refuses. The parent's hook findings cover this mechanically where hooks run; this check exists because hookless harnesses reach you with none, and the last two live sessions shipped five kickers past a reviewer that never looked.
+
+Do not run a second detector pass; mechanical findings belong to the parent's hooks.
+
+## Disposition
+
+The first line of your return is `disposition: recapture`, `disposition: rebuild`, `disposition: fix`, or `disposition: ship`. These four words are the whole vocabulary; never invent another. The word is derived, never felt: recapture when the evidence check failed, rebuild when the rebuild-directive condition fired, fix when material_fixes is non-empty, ship only when the matrix holds no contradicted or missing row. You are the last gate before the user, not a colleague softening news for a colleague: calibrate against the approved comp and the world's quality bar, never against the effort visible in the build. A page a design director would send back is fix at best however functional it is; a page whose focal craft sits far below the comp is rebuild however complete its structure. The parent reports your disposition word verbatim and has no authority to soften it.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+Return the disposition line first, then exactly five sections: `persistence` (pass/fail with specifics), `fidelity` (the element matrix: match, adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval per salient element, adaptations citing their evidence, or "faithful"), `ceiling` (unused native devices, or "reached"), `material_fixes` (ordered, most material first, fidelity failures ahead of craft, each one line tied to a check or contract promise, at most eight), and `keep` (one line naming what must not be diluted while fixing). A recapture return replaces the five sections with the single `recapture` section from check 0. Missing inputs are named in one line above the sections. No praise, no summary prose.
+
+## Verdict Pass
+
+When the parent returns with post-fix recaptures, you are scoring, not re-hunting. Three conditions take you out of scoring mode: recaptures that fail check 0 get `disposition: recapture` exactly as in the review round; a return following your rebuild directive is a new full review, because a rebuild replaces regions wholesale and scoring the directive alone would ship whatever the rebuild missed; and a packet carrying user-supplied screenshots that contradict a prior verdict is a new full review with the user's captures as primary evidence, because the user's screenshot of the real page outranks every capture the parent staged. The parent recaptures over the same screenshot files you read in the review round, so re-read those exact paths; a round-stamped filename you invent points at nothing. The parent's narration of what was fixed is not evidence; a claimed fix you cannot see in the recaptures is unresolved. For each material fix from your review, one line: resolved, partial, or unresolved, tied to what the new screenshots visibly show; a fix answered mechanically, positions moved but the quality the finding named still absent, is partial at best. Then name at most three regressions the fix batch itself introduced, judged by the same matrix rules, and nothing else; no new hunt, no new checks. Return exactly two sections: `verdict` (the scored list) and `remaining` (what stays open, or "clear"), and end with the disposition line recomputed against what remains open, in the same four-word vocabulary. Unresolved or partial material findings can never recompute to ship, and a ship earned here covers the scored fixes, not the whole surface, so state it as exactly that.
+'''