@xgent-ai/skills 0.6.0 → 0.7.1

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/492a8030d11e2f4908d934bd817bd6d16a3164056c74a7172f60e2cec5ff3055

@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-<!-- Generated from skill/agents/ at build time. Do not edit; edit the agent definition. -->
-This harness has no subagent capability, so you are running this role inline. Step fully out of the work you just finished, adopt only this file's instructions for the pass, and disclose the substitution in one line when you report. Where the text below addresses a parent agent, you are both parties: produce the full output contract first, then act on it yourself.
-
-# Impeccable Asset Producer
-
-You are the asset production agent for Impeccable craft. Your job is production cleanup, not new art direction. Work only from the approved mock, assigned crops, contact sheets, and constraints the parent gives you. Every raster you create is a raw ingredient that HTML, CSS, SVG, canvas, and component code will compose.
-
-## Core Rule
-
-Do not redesign. Preserve the reference's visual role, silhouette, palette, lighting, material, texture, camera angle, and composition unless the parent explicitly asks for a change. Preserve perspective only when it belongs to the object or scene itself; when CSS should create the card transform, shadow, rounded clipping, border, or layout, remove that presentation chrome from the raster.
-
-## Decision Comps
-
-When the parent hands you a decision card packet instead of an approved mock, the job is one comp: one card, one file, written to the card's declared `comp` path the moment it renders. The parent runs several of you in parallel, one per card, so this card is your entire contract; generate first, plan never, because the file on disk is the deliverable and the decision page is waiting on it. Work from the card's structured fields and PRODUCT.md alone; report a card too thin to brief a comp, never pad it from imagination. Render the card's direction as a north-star comp at full fidelity: the requested surface's first viewport, prompt led by the surface's own structure (regions named in order with their scale relationships, never the world's atmosphere), fully committed in the card's own palette, type character, and material world. A native app or mobile-first surface is a portrait frame at its device viewport, never a landscape default. Every sibling renders at the same full fidelity in its own grammar, one surface, one aspect; equal commitment keeps the comparison honest. Real product name and real content only; never invent commercial claims, prices, benchmarks, or dates PRODUCT.md does not carry. Exclusions bind those claims, never a medium the card's own world has not excluded: a subject that lives in photographs keeps its photographs. Write the prompt sidecar beside the file. Return one line naming the path and any deviation, nothing more. Everything below this section is the asset-production job; none of it applies to a decision-comp run.
-
-## Review handoff
-
-Return the actual files and any unresolved drift to the parent for the user's plan and asset review in [component-review.md](../component-review.md). A parent or automatic visual check is not a substitute for that human checkpoint. The parent may call you again after it: for regions the user reclassified from code to raster (the spec now lists them with a plate path), or for plates the user asked to revise, with their feedback as the prompt notes. Produce only those, preserve unchanged assets, and hand off real files as before; never self-approve. This checkpoint does not apply to the Decision Comps job above.
-
-## Input Contract
-
-Expect the measured spec (`.impeccable/build/spec.json`, written by `impeccable comp-spec` from the approved comp), the approved comp path, and the skill scripts path. Optionally: a subset of region ids to produce, extra prompt notes per region, and format or transparency needs. Everything else you need is in the spec: each raster region's id, kind (plate, image, texture), pixel box, sampled palette, aspect, note, and the plate path it must land on.
-
-If there is no spec, stop and return one line asking the parent to run `impeccable comp-spec` first. You do not inventory the comp yourself; the spec is the inventory, and a second inventory disagrees with the first.
-
-## The job
-
-Every region with `medium: raster` in the spec ships as a plate at its `plate` path. A plate is the region regenerated at asset resolution from the comp crop as reference: same subject, same composition, same palette, same lighting and material, with the UI text and page chrome removed, at 1.5x the comp region's pixel size or more. The page draws text, controls, radius, shadow, and layout in code; the plate carries what code cannot draw. Crops from the comp are references, never shipping pixels: a comp is reference grade and a shipped crop is how a beautiful comp becomes a blurry site.
-
-Per region, in the spec's order:
-
-1. `.grok/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --crop <id>` writes the reference crop under `.impeccable/build/crops/`.
-2. Choose the background from the approved region: an isolated figure, object, or line drawing on the page ground is a **transparent cutout**; a photograph, full-frame illustration, or texture stays **opaque**. Save `.grok/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --plate-prompt <id> --background transparent` to a UTF-8 prompt file for a cutout; use `--background opaque` otherwise. The transparent prompt preserves reference placement and clear margins, white paint, fine edges, and interior holes.
-3. Produce the plate at its exact spec `plate` path. Create the output directory first and choose a supported output size matching the region's aspect, at least 1.5x its pixel dimensions. Prefer the harness-native image tool with the crop as input and the saved prompt; request a transparent PNG for cutouts, then run `.grok/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable embed-prompt <plate> --prompt-file <prompt.txt>` (if you refine the prompt, save and embed the exact text sent). With the API fallback, run `.grok/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable generate-image --ref <crop.png> --prompt-file <prompt.txt> --out <plate.png> --size <WxH> --quality high --background transparent` for a cutout, or `--background opaque` otherwise. The API fallback embeds the prompt and records the background in the sidecar. The output must be PNG; the fallback requests native alpha and performs no chroma-keying.
-4. Open the plate beside the crop and compare subject, placement, scale, palette, and style. For cutouts, verify a real alpha channel and inspect composites on light and dark grounds: white paint must stay solid, interior holes must clear, and fine edges must avoid halos. Inspect glass and soft shadows carefully; partial alpha alone does not ensure convincing translucency. Never chroma-key native transparent output or flatten it before saving. If a native tool returns opaque pixels or a painted checkerboard, retry with the API fallback when available; otherwise report the transparency blocker. On a visual miss, tighten the prompt and regenerate once. Two misses on one region: keep the better plate, mark it `needs_parent_review`, and name the drift. The parent runs the plates gate after all assets exist; report `unscored` until a gate score is available.
-5. A frame plate (a window, a doorway, an arch) is a transparent cutout with an opening: generate it with a transparent background and keep the opening fully transparent. Verify the alpha inside the opening before saving: no baked view, no glow or vignette halo across it. The content seen through the opening is its own image region; produce it separately at the opening's size.
-
-Do not redesign. Do not add objects, restyle, or reinterpret; the comp was approved as it is. Do not touch the page code, the spec, or the comp. Do not produce anything the spec does not list; a region the parent forgot goes back as a one-line note, not a plate.
-
-## Output Contract
-
-Return one line per raster region: `<id> <plate path> <WxH> <score%|unscored> <accepted|needs_parent_review|blocked> <one-line note or ->`. Then `blockers` (missing spec, missing comp, no image capability, exhausted key) and `assumptions`, each global and minimal. Nothing else: no summary, no praise, no implementation advice. The parent runs `impeccable build-phase advance` to verify the plates against the same spec; a visual acceptance does not override a failing gate.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/494d6fcb4701c437597c2ed16a9595af92f3d9ad53c944c96a2fb563bd766af5

@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-Quiet design is harder than bold design. Subtlety needs precision. Reduce visual intensity in designs that are too loud, aggressive, or overstimulating without losing personality or making the result generic.
-
----
-
-## Visitor mode
-
-Persuade + Experience: "quieter" means more restrained palette, more whitespace, more typographic air. Drama is reduced, not eliminated; the POV stays intact.
-
-Operate + Read: "quieter" means reducing visual noise. Fewer background accents, flatter cards, less color, less motion. The tool should disappear more completely into the task.
-
----
-
-## Assess Current State
-
-Analyze what makes the design feel too intense:
-
-1. **Identify intensity sources**:
-   - **Color saturation**: Overly bright or saturated colors
-   - **Contrast extremes**: Too much high-contrast juxtaposition
-   - **Visual weight**: Too many bold, heavy elements competing
-   - **Animation excess**: Too much motion or overly dramatic effects
-   - **Complexity**: Too many visual elements, patterns, or decorations
-   - **Scale**: Everything is large and loud with no hierarchy
-
-2. **Understand the context**:
-   - What's the purpose? (Marketing vs tool vs reading experience)
-   - Who's the audience? (Some contexts need energy)
-   - What's working? (Don't throw away good ideas)
-   - What's the core message? (Preserve what matters)
-
-If any of these are unclear from the codebase, do not guess. Ask the user directly to clarify what you cannot infer.
-
-**CRITICAL**: "Quieter" doesn't mean boring or generic. It means refined and easier on the eyes. Think luxury, not laziness.
-
-## Plan Refinement
-
-Create a strategy to reduce intensity while maintaining impact:
-
-- **Color approach**: Desaturate or shift to more restrained tones?
-- **Hierarchy approach**: Which elements should stay bold (very few), which should recede?
-- **Simplification approach**: What can be removed entirely?
-- **Sophistication approach**: How can we signal quality through restraint?
-
-**IMPORTANT**: Subtlety requires precision. Quiet without intent collapses to generic.
-
-## Refine the Design
-
-Systematically reduce intensity across these dimensions:
-
-### Color Refinement
-- **Reduce saturation**: Shift from fully saturated to 70-85% saturation
-- **Soften palette**: Replace bright colors with muted tones
-- **Reduce color variety**: Use fewer colors more thoughtfully
-- **Neutral dominance**: Let neutrals do more work, use color as accent (10% rule)
-- **Gentler contrasts**: High contrast only where it matters most
-- **Tinted grays**: Use warm or cool tinted grays instead of pure gray. Adds depth without loudness
-- **Never gray on color**: If you have gray text on a colored background, use a darker shade of that color or transparency instead
-
-### Visual Weight Reduction
-- **Typography**: Reduce font weights (900 → 600, 700 → 500), decrease sizes where appropriate
-- **Hierarchy through subtlety**: Use weight, size, and space instead of color and boldness
-- **White space**: Increase breathing room, reduce density
-- **Borders & lines**: Reduce thickness, decrease opacity, or remove entirely
-
-### Simplification
-- **Remove decorative elements**: Gradients, shadows, patterns, textures that don't serve purpose
-- **Simplify shapes**: Reduce border radius extremes, simplify custom shapes
-- **Reduce layering**: Flatten visual hierarchy where possible
-- **Clean up effects**: Reduce or remove blur effects, glows, multiple shadows
-
-### Motion Reduction
-- **Reduce animation intensity**: Shorter distances (10-20px instead of 40px), gentler easing
-- **Remove decorative animations**: Keep functional motion, remove flourishes
-- **Subtle micro-interactions**: Replace dramatic effects with gentle feedback
-- **Refined easing**: Use ease-out-quart for smooth, understated motion. Never bounce or elastic
-- **Remove animations entirely** if they're not serving a clear purpose
-
-### Composition Refinement
-- **Reduce scale jumps**: Smaller contrast between sizes creates calmer feeling
-- **Align to grid**: Bring rogue elements back into systematic alignment
-- **Even out spacing**: Replace extreme spacing variations with consistent rhythm
-
-**NEVER**:
-- Make everything the same size/weight (hierarchy still matters)
-- Remove all color (quiet ≠ grayscale)
-- Eliminate all personality (maintain character through refinement)
-- Sacrifice usability for aesthetics (functional elements still need clear affordances)
-- Make everything small and light (some anchors needed)
-
-## Verify Quality
-
-Ensure refinement maintains quality:
-
-- **Still functional**: Can users still accomplish tasks easily?
-- **Still distinctive**: Does it have character, or is it generic now?
-- **Better reading**: Is text easier to read for extended periods?
-- **Restrained, not absent**: Does the POV survive the cuts?
-
-When the result feels right, hand off to `/impeccable polish` for the final pass.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/4972f28d96897c8dec891f0de7a0d9d51f36030ff780ed9d960241c75413da2b

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-# Visualize: Direction Comps & Asset Production
-
-Load this from [new-work.md](new-work.md) on a comp-led build, when image generation is available (a harness-native tool or the API fallback `impeccable context` reports). A code-led contract skips this file by design, not by drift; do not load it then. PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md are preconditions. The MODE RULES block concept-seed printed for this surface (COMPS) governs these comps together with this file and wins where they conflict; with no roll this session, read the mode's file named in new-work.md. New-work has already resolved the visual world; this file must not reopen it. A surface-scope structure round that already put three visualized cards before the user (new-work.md, established world) has discharged this round: the locked card's comp is the approved comp, so record the approval and continue at After approval; generate nothing new.
-
-A probe tests composition, narrative, hierarchy, density, focal moment, signature use, and image requirements. It is not a second identity workshop. Keep DESIGN.md's palette, typography direction, material language, component character, imagery stance, and motion grammar fixed.
-
-## Generate three compositional options
-
-The comp round runs inside the build's phase state: `impeccable build-phase start --direction <seed key> --kind <...>` has already run (the roll's output names the command) and its `comps` phase is open before the first comp is generated; a comp rendered before that sits outside the state, and a session resumed from that point has no phases to follow. `impeccable generate-image` refuses to write under `.impeccable/mocks/` until start has run; a harness-native image tool is bound by the same order.
-
-Render three distinct high-fidelity north-star comps of the requested surface, saved under `.impeccable/mocks/` so they survive the session. Comp at the surface's own viewport: portrait at device size for a native app or mobile-first surface, desktop landscape otherwise; a phone screen comped landscape misstates the composition before anything is built against it. Comps are the build thread's own work, never delegated: the thread that writes the prompts holds the direction's full context and has seen every comp when the build starts. Open every image by its workspace-relative path; sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths, and everything under the project root has a relative one. Base the comps on real content and the surface concepts already developed with the user. On an established world, anchor every comp on the real identity: capture a screenshot of a representative existing page and pass it as a reference image (the harness image tool's input image, or `impeccable generate-image --ref`); the prompt leads with the new surface's structure while the reference carries palette, type, and component character, because DESIGN.md words alone drift where a pixel reference does not. Name what the reference contributes and what it must not: chrome, palette, type, and component character carry over; the reference page's own content does not, and a banner, hero, or card lifted verbatim is the reference leaking, not fidelity. Three is the number: one comp invites rubber-stamping; the spread between three surfaces the composition worth building. The chosen card's decision comp is the first of the three: it already renders this direction at full fidelity under this discipline, so generate two more that vary what the first held fixed, from the direction in words rather than with the first comp as an input image (a reference image anchors the layout, and three comps collapse into one composition). How comps two and three vary from the first is the mode's call, in its COMPS rules. A variant that simplifies the first into a tidier version of itself adds no choice to the round. Send all three to the approval point together. Only a round arriving with no decision comp (a degraded roll, an identity-mode page, a direction pinned without the decision round) renders all three here.
-
-- A comp is a designed surface, not a picture of the subject. Lead the prompt with the surface's own structure: the regions this design has, named in order with their scale relationships; a page with no navigation says so instead of inventing one, and an unconventional surface states its unconventional skeleton. A prompt that leads with atmosphere gets a vignette back: the model paints the fish market instead of the fish market's website. How far the world reaches into the page, and what it may carry, is the mode's call, in its COMPS rules. Render the page itself edge to edge: no browser window, address bar, device or desk around it, so prompt it as the page, never as a screenshot of a browser. Self-check every render: if it could hang as a poster, or reads as a photograph with some text on it, it is not a comp; regenerate with the dealt composition's regions named and its parts working in place.
-- The inverse is also a failure: a surface with none of its subject in it. The subject appears as the content the regions hold; the world dresses the frame and never displaces what the frame shows. The deletion usually rides in on the prompt's exclusion list, so exclusions bind invented claims, and a medium ban belongs to the committed imagery stance, never to caution. Before accepting a render, point at the subject; a render that depicts everything about the world and nothing of the subject fails however faithful its atmosphere. Regenerate with the subject's content named region by region.
-- Judge a comp as the shipped screen: the visitor's job must be readable from the image alone. Name the surface's mode from the render with no caption; a render whose mode cannot be read back is art direction without a surface. Regenerate with the visitor's job as the prompt's spine.
-- Commitment is depth, not performance spread across regions. The world enters through one dominant move plus the material, type, and spacing that support it; the remaining regions hold still in that material so the move can be read. A region that simply does its job in the world's grammar carries the direction further than a region performing the concept. The check cuts competition, never content: a quieted region keeps its information and stops performing, and the page still carries its content (a way to navigate, the offer, its supporting copy, an action, a glimpse of what follows) at real reading size (body text near 16px on a 1440px-wide page). That is a list of content, not a layout: where each piece sits is the composition's call. A second element competing with the named focal moment at the same scale means the comp is shouting; with no named focal moment, several regions performing the concept at once is the same shout. Regenerate keeping the strongest move and quieting the rest. Busy is louder, not bolder.
-- When the user shortlisted multiple concepts, spread the three across them.
-- When one direction is committed, vary the structural uncertainty an image can resolve: topology, sequence, density, hierarchy, focal composition, or interaction framing.
-- Show enough beyond the opening moment to prove the concept can govern the whole surface.
-- Do not generate a palette artifact, ask new atmosphere questions, introduce a different type voice, or invent a new motif. If the committed world cannot support the concept, return to the concept shortlist rather than changing the world.
-
-Each comp is a direction test, not a screenshot specification. Core UI text, responsive behavior, accessibility, semantics, and interaction states remain implementation responsibilities.
-
-## One approval point
-
-Show the three together on the decision page (`impeccable serve-question`, one option per comp with the comp as its hero), or in the harness only when it renders images inline; a text-only surface does not count as display. Ask what should carry forward, what feels false to the world, and whether the selected concept should be approved, combined, revised, or rejected. Then stop and wait. A structured simulated user counts as attended and receives the same question.
-
-Do not begin code until the user approves a direction or explicitly delegates the choice. If they delegate, choose using the task brief, PRODUCT.md, and DESIGN.md, and state the evidence. Approval refines the task concept; it does not modify DESIGN.md.
-
-This approval point has no substitute and no skip condition. When the structured question tool errors, fall back to the decision page; only after both fail may you treat the choice as delegated, and a delegated pick is recorded exactly as an approval is and disclosed in your first reply, not your last. The finish reviewer treats comp-round comps with no recorded approval as a material finding; decision comps under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` are the direction round's hand, not comp-round output, and imply no approval on their own.
-
-After approval, record the choice where tools can find it: the approved comp's path goes in the surface brief, and its prompt sidecar (the image's full file name plus `.json`: `a.png` gets `a.png.json`) gains `"approved": true` (every comp generated through `impeccable generate-image` has one; create it if a native tool didn't). The sidecar travels with the mocks folder, so the approval survives sessions and machines that never see the brief, and it is what `impeccable build-phase advance` reads to close the comps phase. Summarize the composition and the parts of the comp that must not be literalized, return to new-work.md, record the direction contract from the approved concept, and build.
-
-## After approval: the comp becomes a spec
-
-The approved comp is a north star for translation into semantic, responsive, accessible code, never a license to recompose: keeping the palette and mood while redrawing the topology is a second art direction. Do not rasterize core UI text or controls. Do not substitute a different visual driver after approval without asking.
-
-What the comp shows is measured, not remembered. new-work.md section 6 runs the build as phases (`impeccable build-phase`): the spec phase turns the comp into region boxes with sampled palettes (`impeccable comp-spec`), and the medium of every region follows from what the pixels are, never from what feels buildable: a figure, a product object, machinery, any illustration with perspective, shading, or drawing skill in it, and any texture by name (woven cloth, paper grain, fabric, leather, brushed metal) is a `plate` / `image` / `texture` region and ships as a raster; text, controls, chrome, diagrams with countable elements, flat shape systems, and anything that must move, scale, or respond are semantic. Writing "CSS" for a sculpted panel's finish, or a many-vertex `clip-path` for a torn edge, is the quiet deletion of the approved design; the detector's organic-clip-path and buried-raster rules and the hero gate's region scores catch it. Dropping an image-native region is a scope decision the user makes at the approval point, never a silent flattening after it. Generated imagery is a material, not a claim: evidence rules bind assertions, specs, testimonials, and photographs presented as real, never render fidelity.
-
-## Plates and provenance
-
-Every raster region's plate is produced in the plates phase, before any page code, by the shipped asset producer or in the current thread (use `impeccable comp-spec --crop <id>` and save `impeccable comp-spec --plate-prompt <id>` to a prompt file; pass the crop and prompt to the harness image tool, or use `impeccable generate-image --ref <crop.png> --prompt-file <prompt.txt> --out <plate.png> --size <WxH> --quality high`). For isolated cutouts, add `--background transparent` to both the plate-prompt and API generation commands; use native PNG alpha and preserve white paint and clear gaps. Use `--background opaque` for full-frame imagery. Create output directories first and inspect alpha on light and dark grounds. Generation context is part of the asset: after generating any image with any tool, run `.grok/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable embed-prompt <image> --prompt "<prompt>"` with the exact string the tool received (`impeccable generate-image` does this itself), so the intent lives inside the file; `--read` recovers it, `--scan <dir>` lists rasters still missing one. The embedded prompt plus the region's row in the spec is the raster's **provenance**, and every raster the artifact references carries it; a sourced, stock, or pre-existing raster embeds its origin instead. A raster created or replaced later, in a fix batch or a reviewer's rebuild, is produced the same way; a raster a fix abandons is deleted in the same batch.
-
-Convert images with a converter `impeccable context` reported at boot (the IMAGE_TOOLS line); probe only when it reported none, at most once per session, never per image.
-
-Return to [new-work.md](new-work.md) for the direction contract, the phased build, and the finishing pass.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/49a7b37b98fb6e3ef68154174677ff4b9f1715efcffdbf6b30c3535b3e4e302c

@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-Report and repair drift between this project's Impeccable artifacts and what the installed version reads: PRODUCT.md, DESIGN.md and its `.impeccable/design.json` sidecar, `.impeccable/config.json`, persisted surface briefs, and the design hook.
-
-This is maintenance, not design. Do not redesign anything, do not open files outside the ones the report names, and do not run any other command as a side effect.
-
-## What this owns, and what it does not
-
-Three kinds of drift travel under "out of date". Keep them apart:
-
-- **Tool version.** The installed skill is older than the published one. `impeccable context` reports that at boot as `UPDATE_AVAILABLE` and `npx impeccable update` fixes it. Not this command's job.
-- **Schema drift.** An artifact was written by an older Impeccable: fields nothing reads, fields now expected, files in retired locations. Mechanical, and this command repairs most of it.
-- **Truth drift.** The code moved on and the document no longer describes it. No file comparison settles this. `document` owns DESIGN.md, `init` owns PRODUCT.md, and this command's job is to hand them a specific gap rather than a vague suspicion.
-
-## Step 1: Run the pass
-
-```
-.codex/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable doctor --json
-```
-
-Add `--target <path>` when the user named a workspace, file, or route in a monorepo. Without it the report describes the repo root, and in a monorepo that is often the wrong project.
-
-The output carries `findings` (each with `id`, `artifact`, `path`, `severity`, `summary`, `fix`) and, in a monorepo, `workspaces` with each app's product and design resolution. `ruleRegistryAvailable: false` means ignored rule ids could not be validated; say so rather than implying that list is clean.
-
-An empty `findings` array is the good outcome. Say so in one line and stop.
-
-## Step 2: Act by severity
-
-The severity says what should happen, not how bad it is.
-
-- **`auto`** carries no decision. Run `.codex/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable doctor --fix` once to apply these, then report what it moved in one line. Do not ask permission first, and do not ask about them afterward.
-- **`mention`** needs the user to know but not to decide anything now. State each one in a sentence with its offered fix.
-- **`route`** needs a specific command. Name the command and the gap it would close. Run it only if the user asks in this turn; `init` and `document` are conversations, not repairs you perform unattended.
-
-Report all three groups in one pass. Findings are not errors and the command does not fail on them.
-
-## Step 3: Deprecated fields are binding
-
-A finding that reports a deprecated field (`## Register` is the current one) is not a style note. Treat that field as absent for every decision from here on, whatever value it holds, and offer to delete the section. Preserving it "just in case" is how a retired axis keeps steering current output.
-
-## Step 4: Do not overclaim on truth drift
-
-`design-md-drift` counts commits to the visual source directories since DESIGN.md was last edited. A commit count is not a contradiction. Report the number, say what it measures, and if the user wants to know whether the document is actually wrong, read DESIGN.md against the current tokens and components and answer from that. Never assert that DESIGN.md is stale because the number is large.
-
-The same restraint applies to `workspace-context-inherited`. Inheritance is a designed behavior. Whether one product record truthfully describes several apps is a question for the user, not a defect to fix.
-
-## Monorepo notes
-
-- `workspace-platform-native-evidence` is the finding that matters most here: a workspace carrying native build files while inheriting a root record that resolves to web gets web guidance for its whole life and never loads [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md). The repair is a child PRODUCT.md in that workspace, because one inherited record cannot hold two platforms.
-- `config-project-roots-match-nothing` means every `projectRoots` glob missed, so the repo root is silently standing in as the active project. A renamed workspace directory is the usual cause. Report the patterns and ask which directories they should name.
-- `config-invalid-build-path` and `config-build-path-unset` both concern one key, `buildPath` in `.impeccable/config.json` (or the gitignored `.impeccable/config.local.json`, which wins for that developer). It holds `comp` or `code` and sets whether new surfaces are built from a generated comp or straight in code. An unread value does not fall back to the opposite path, so a project meaning `code` has been building comp-led; report the exact value. The unset finding fires only where a project has done direction work and never recorded a preference, and the offer belongs in it only when image generation exists in your tool surface. Without image generation there is nothing to choose and nothing to say.
-- Use the `workspaces` table to show the user which apps carry their own context, which inherit, and which have none, before proposing any change.
-
-## Opting out of the boot check
-
-`impeccable context` reports the cheap subset of these findings at session start, throttled to once a week per project. Set `"stalenessCheck": false` in `.impeccable/config.json` to silence that, or `IMPECCABLE_NO_STALENESS_CHECK=1` for one session. This command still works with the check disabled, and that is the combination to suggest for a user who wants the report only when they ask for it.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/4a6f0386bff78bb42efa285df2919e75209ec336672cf5fff91ba66ffb352eaa

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
-# Plan and asset review
-
-Use this checkpoint on comp-led builds once every raster region has its plate and the plates gate has scored them, before any page code exists. The approved comp is the reference. The user reviews two things: the plates that will ship, and the production plan for everything else, meaning which regions code draws. A painted region planned as code is the most expensive mistake a comp-led build makes, and this is where the user catches it. Text, controls and chrome are judged later, in the assembled first viewport.
-
-## Plan, capture, serve
-
-Run `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review plan`. It writes `.impeccable/review/components.json` from the measured spec, the comp and the plate files, and refuses, naming each one, while any raster region lacks its plate. Never write or edit that file for this stage: the packet is derived from the spec, so every change belongs in the regions file.
-
-If the harness exposes `component_review`, call it with `manifest_path` set to `.impeccable/review/components.json`. The host captures, presents the review and returns the user's decisions. A suspended request is waiting for the user; it is not a failed build or an approval.
-
-Otherwise run `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review capture --manifest .impeccable/review/components.json`, then start `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review serve --session <returned session>` in the background. Open the URL it prints in the available browser and wait for the user; `serve` exits 0 once they submit. Read the decisions with `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review status --session <id>`; `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review verify --manifest .impeccable/review/components.json` confirms approval and refuses pending, needs-work and stale input. Never submit the page or write a receipt on the user's behalf.
-
-`serve` exits 2 when this session has no browser (the same signal as the decision page) and 4 when it closes after 30 idle minutes without a decision. Either way no one is reviewing: stop waiting, do not approve anything yourself, and do not build past this checkpoint. End the run and report the plan and asset review as pending with its session ID, so the user can resume it. A waiting review is pending work, not a completed build.
-
-## Act on the receipt
-
-Apply the user's decisions as given, never your own favorable verdict in their place.
-
-- **approve**: once every item is approved and the inventory is confirmed, advance to the hero.
-- **revise** (a plate): regenerate that plate at the same path with the user's feedback.
-- **revise with split** (an asset): replace that region in the regions file with its layers: a frame plate with a transparent opening (kind `plate`, same box), the content as its own `image` region at the opening's box, and each moving part (a shutter, a door) as its own plate. Name each layer after the original region, as `<id>-frame`, `<id>-view` or `<id>-shutter-left`, so the next round shows it as part of the user's request. Rerun `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>` and produce the plates.
-- **revise** (a plan item): change the regions file as the feedback says (resize or extend a raster region, split material into its own plate region, or adjust the code region), rerun `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce any new plates.
-- **reclassify** (a code region): in the regions file, change that region's `kind` to the one the user chose and rewrite its `note` to describe the material. Rerun `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, then produce the new plates, with the asset producer when subagents are available.
-- **missing**: add the region to the regions file, rerun `.kiro/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce its plate if it is raster.
-
-Then run `plan`, `capture` and `serve` again. Unchanged decisions carry over, so the user sees only what changed. Any spec change, or a plate replaced after acceptance, needs a new round; the build-phase gate stays closed until the review of the current spec is accepted.
-
-## Assemble and review
-
-Build the first viewport from the approved plates and plan, and run the hero gate. Human review does not waive its integrity checks. After three failed hero attempts, stop iterating and present the first-viewport review with the current build; the user's eye settles what the readings could not.
-
-Present a second manifest at `.impeccable/review/hero.json`. You write this one, and its shape is fixed:
-
-```json
-{
-  "schemaVersion": 2,
-  "stage": "hero",
-  "id": "hero",
-  "title": "First viewport",
-  "comp": {"path": ".impeccable/mocks/comp.png", "width": 1536, "height": 1024},
-  "components": [{
-    "id": "first-viewport",
-    "name": "First viewport",
-    "medium": "HTML / CSS",
-    "note": "Assembled first viewport",
-    "box": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1},
-    "preview": {"kind": "page", "path": "index.html"},
-    "dependencies": ["styles.css", "assets/plates/sky.png", "fonts/display.woff2"]
-  }]
-}
-```
-
-- `schemaVersion` is 2. Version 3 is the plan review packet and requires stage `components`. `codeRegions` and `specSha256` exist only in version 3 and are refused here. `reviewGroup` is refused too: version 3 rejects it, and any other version accepts it only on a page preview in a `components`-stage manifest, never in a hero manifest.
-- `comp.path` is the `comp` value in `.impeccable/build/spec.json`, and `width` and `height` are that PNG's pixel size.
-- Exactly one component, with `box` exactly `{"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1}` and `name`, `medium` and `note` as strings.
-- `preview.path` is the page entry the build gates (`artifact` in `.impeccable/build/state.json`).
-- `dependencies` lists every other file the page loads (stylesheets, scripts, plates, images, fonts) as bare strings. Every path, here and above, is project-relative and plain: no leading `./` or `/`, no `..`, no URL, no `?`, `#`, `%`, `:` or backslash. A request to a file missing from this list, or to another host, fails the capture.
-
-The reference stays the approved comp. Call the same host review tool, or run `capture`, `serve` and `verify` with this manifest. Needs-work feedback starts another assembly round.
-
-Acceptance closes human review for this build: never request plan, asset or assembly approval again. While the page renders what the user accepted, the hero score, the palette check and every numeric reading are advisories; material vetoes still hold (a missing or unreferenced plate, an SVG illustration, an organic clip, a clipped plate, invented ink, failed rendered presence). When the capture no longer matches the accepted screenshot, restore what the user accepted; until then the readings apply. Complete the rest of the page, responsive behavior, finish checks and documentation with the accepted first viewport as the visual direction. This is first-viewport calibration, not a claim that the user reviewed the rest of the page. Shared stylesheet edits do not reopen approval. Preserve the accepted direction; a later explicit user change is a new task.
-
-Assembled-page capture executes inline and declared local scripts from the pinned inputs. Network APIs, frames and workers are unavailable; the initial viewport must settle before capture. Keep the real page and declare its scripts rather than removing behavior to pass review.