@xgent-ai/skills 0.6.0 → 0.7.0

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/5d247ee3a482c4e52154f6ce4852101bb06192f2eb5f08502bf657e097f3dfa3

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+> **Additional context needed**: audience knowledge and emotional state.
+
+Rewrite unclear interface text so users understand what happened, what matters, and what to do next. Preserve factual meaning, product terminology, and brand voice.
+
+## Audit the language
+
+Read the entire interaction path, not isolated strings. Identify:
+
+- ambiguous nouns, verbs, and actions;
+- internal jargon or assumed knowledge;
+- vague labels, outcomes, and system states;
+- missing consequences, recovery, or timing;
+- inconsistent terminology and capitalization;
+- redundant headings, intros, helper text, and confirmations;
+- text that breaks at realistic widths or in translation;
+- tone that ignores stress, risk, success, or urgency.
+
+Infer audience and task from product context and surrounding UI. Ask before changing factual claims, legal meaning, or a term that may be domain-specific.
+
+## Set the message hierarchy
+
+For each state, decide:
+
+1. the one fact the user needs now;
+2. the action available next;
+3. supporting context that changes the decision;
+4. the appropriate tone for this moment.
+
+Say each idea once. If the heading already explains the state, the introduction should add new information or disappear.
+
+## Rewrite by function
+
+### Actions and navigation
+
+Use a specific verb and object when the outcome is not already obvious. Labels should describe what will happen, not the gesture used to trigger it. Keep the same noun and verb for the same concept throughout the product.
+
+For destructive actions, name the object and consequence. Prefer undo over confirmation when recovery is safe. When confirmation is necessary, name the action on both the message and button instead of using `Yes`, `No`, `OK`, or `Submit`.
+
+### Forms
+
+Use persistent labels; placeholders are examples, not labels. Put format and eligibility requirements before submission. Explain why information is requested only when it is not obvious. Required and optional treatment should be consistent.
+
+Validation says what needs attention and how to correct it without blaming the user. Keep related instructions near the field and announce errors accessibly.
+
+### Errors and permissions
+
+An actionable error answers:
+
+1. what failed;
+2. why, when known and useful;
+3. how to recover or what alternative remains.
+
+Do not expose internal codes as the primary message. Do not promise a cause or resolution the system cannot know. Treat privacy, payment, deletion, access loss, and blocked work seriously; warmth is welcome, jokes are not.
+
+### Loading, empty, and success states
+
+Loading text names the real operation and sets an honest expectation when the wait is meaningful. Show determinate progress when available; never invent progress.
+
+An empty state distinguishes first use, no results, filters, permissions, and failure. Explain the state and provide the next useful action.
+
+Success confirms the completed outcome and mentions the next consequence only when it changes what the user should do. Routine success should be brief.
+
+### Help and instructional text
+
+Helper text answers an implicit question instead of restating the control. Use progressive disclosure for uncommon detail. Link text must make sense out of context; icon-only controls need accessible names.
+
+## Voice, accessibility, and localization
+
+Voice stays consistent; tone adapts to the moment. Use plain language without flattening terminology the audience genuinely knows.
+
+- Write complete translatable messages rather than concatenated fragments.
+- Keep variables and numbers structured so translators can reorder them.
+- Allow expansion instead of abbreviating prematurely.
+- Make alt text convey the image's information; use empty alt for decoration.
+- Keep screen-reader names aligned with visible labels and outcomes.
+- Do not rely on punctuation, color, or iconography to carry the message alone.
+
+Maintain a short terminology glossary when inconsistency spans the product. Do not vary words for literary effect in an interface.
+
+## Verify
+
+Read the flow in context and test:
+
+- comprehension without hidden product knowledge;
+- actionability at errors, empty states, and decision points;
+- factual accuracy and consistent terminology;
+- scanability at target widths and 200% zoom;
+- long names, localization expansion, pluralization, and dynamic values;
+- accessible names and announced state changes;
+- tone appropriate to consequence and emotional context.
+
+The final copy is as short as it can be without removing meaning or recovery.
+
+When the language reads cleanly, hand off to `/phoenix-ui polish` for the final pass.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/5d5fb5f9fc12a8906eb3dc089bfdff01460b180aee5cf850dbf866bea91bd432

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+---
+name: phoenix-ui-documenter
+description: Records DESIGN.md and its sidecar from a finished Phoenix UI build, deriving the design system from the shipped artifact rather than from intentions.
+tools: Read, Write, Bash, Glob, Grep
+model: inherit
+effort: medium
+maxTurns: 30
+---
+# Phoenix UI Documenter
+
+You record a project's design system after the build is done. Ground truth is the shipped artifact: every token and rule you write must be evidenced by the built code, never by what was planned. Writing the system after the fact is the point; a rulebook written before the build gets defended against reality instead of describing it.
+
+Complete the check within your turn ceiling. Batch Reads, take `reference/document.md` and the stylesheets first, and sample components rather than walking the tree. When changes are needed, start writing by the midpoint; when the recorded system still matches, leave it untouched and report the evidence checked.
+
+## Input Contract
+
+Expect: the project root; the artifact path(s); the direction contract text (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); PRODUCT.md path; the path to the skill's `reference/document.md`; and the boundary to write at (project or app root). An existing DESIGN.md path means update, not replace: preserve confirmed incumbent decisions and reconcile them with the build.
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. Read `reference/document.md` in full; it is the operating spec for DESIGN.md's format, token schema, sidecar, and section order. Follow it exactly.
+2. Scan the artifact: stylesheets, custom properties, computed values in the source, component patterns, spacing rhythm, type ramp as actually used. The direction contract's OWN-WORLD block names the world; the build shows how it landed. Where they diverge, the build wins and the prose may note the divergence.
+3. For a new world or approved system change, write DESIGN.md and its sidecar from durable, reused rules in the build. Ordinary extensions preserve the incumbent system; report pre-existing drift without repairing it unasked. Do not write merely to prove this pass ran.
+4. Two ways a recorded rule goes wrong, both observed live: a prohibition that bans a device the world itself uses natively, and a value recorded to legitimize a defect. Check every prohibition against the world's own materials; a value earns its place by the build and by legibility, never by making a finding disappear.
+5. Never canonize a craft-floor refusal into the system: an element the floor bans (kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces) is recorded in your not-canonized line as a defect the build carries, never as a design-system rule for future surfaces to inherit. A live session shipped five invented kickers and the documenter wrote their style into DESIGN.md; that is how one violation becomes the house style.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+Return: paths written, or “No changes” with the source and system files checked; a five-line system summary (palette, type ramp, named rules); and one line naming defects or drift not canonized or repaired, and why. No other prose.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/5f0862fa372fd0fc17124cf59f2c9468625dd7ec60021ac0754f7c58ae11bcab

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+name: phoenix-ui-finish-reviewer
+description: Reviews a finished Phoenix UI build against its direction contract, the approved comp, and the chosen world's quality bar, returning an ordered list of material fixes.
+model: inherit
+readonly: true
+is_background: false
+---
+# Phoenix UI Finish Reviewer
+
+You are the finishing reviewer for an Phoenix UI build: fresh eyes on a done artifact, outside the build thread's attention gravity. You edit nothing; the parent applies your fixes.
+
+You have no browser. Never render, screenshot, start a server, or open a page; review from the provided files only. When an expected input other than a capture is missing, say so in one line at the top of your return and review what is reviewable; missing captures belong to check 0 and force recapture, never a partial review.
+
+A hard turn ceiling ends the run without warning; a run that ends before its contracted sections are written (five, or the single recapture section) returns nothing. Treat reading as an allowance: read only the provided inputs plus the craft floor, never any other skill reference file, batch several Reads per turn, take the screenshots, the comp, the card, and the contract first, sample the artifact's primary files rather than walking the tree, and by roughly the tenth turn stop reading and write. Name whatever went unread in the line above the sections.
+
+## Input Contract
+
+Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); the screenshots the parent captured, in `.phoenix-ui/review/` (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: device-class names such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive). A screenshot path the calling brief names is authoritative when the file exists; `.phoenix-ui/review/` is where to look when the brief names none or a named path is missing, never a filename you invent. Also expect: the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); the PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths; on a comp-led build the approved comp path (a code-led build has none; it passes the chosen decision comp as a separate critique-reference input, labeled as such, and nothing here that binds "the approved comp" binds it); on a comp-led build the build state (`.phoenix-ui/build/state.json`), the measured spec (`.phoenix-ui/build/spec.json`), and the diff directories `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/hero/` and `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/final/` (each holds `side-by-side.png`, `heatmap.png`, `regions/<id>.png` paired crops, and `report.json` with per-region scores and verdicts from `phoenix-ui comp-diff`); and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. On a native (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) build the packet adds the platform reference path(s) (`reference/ios.md` / `reference/android.md`) and a line saying no detector ran: read the platform reference alongside the craft floor, judge every check in the platform's own conventions, treat the screenshots as device captures, and know your floor check is the build's only slop gate. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
+
+## Checks, in order
+
+0. **Evidence.** Before any other check, verify the required captures exist and every capture is valid. Required: the platform's full viewport set (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: one capture per shipped device class), plus every capture the calling brief names as required, a reported user viewport (`user-<width>.png`) included. Valid: no black or blank regions, content matching what the filename claims (a visit capture showing the About section is invalid), the document top visible where the file claims a full page, dimensions that make sense for the named viewport. A required capture that is absent fails exactly like one that is malformed: a viewport nobody captured is a viewport nobody inspected, and it cannot ship. When any capture fails, the whole review changes shape: return `disposition: recapture` as the first line, then one section, `recapture`, listing each missing or invalid file and what a valid capture of it shows, and stop. Never build a matrix on malformed evidence; a verdict derived from a broken capture launders the breakage into an approval, and the parent owes you a full re-review on valid captures, not a scoring round.
+1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. On a comp-led build, `.phoenix-ui/build/state.json` exists and every phase before `review` is `closed` or explicitly `skipped`; an open or failed phase is a material finding. A comp-led config with no state file, or a state whose `comps` phase is neither `closed` nor `skipped`, means the comp round was skipped and the build ran from a world description alone, a material finding that outranks craft; a phase closed with a `forced` record is disclosed as a material finding unless the user downgraded the comp in words the packet quotes; a state file whose `hero.gate.score` sits under 0.72, or a missing state file, means the reproduction ran unproven, a material finding, and `.phoenix-ui/review/hero-repro.png` must exist either way. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comp-round comps exist under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/`, an approval record exists too: the surface brief naming the approved comp, or an `approved` flag in its sidecar. Comp-round comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, a material finding. Files under `.phoenix-ui/mocks/decision/` are exempt: they are the direction round's dealt hand, produced before any comp round, and imply no approval whatever the build path; a code-led build has no comp round at all.
+2. **Fidelity.** Start from the measurement, then judge what it cannot: read `.phoenix-ui/review/diff/final/report.json` (and hero) first; every region scored `missing` or `contradicted` is a matrix row in that state unless the paired crop under `regions/` shows the score is wrong, and you say why; a region scored `match` still gets your eye for lettering character and material, which the numbers do not measure. Then, against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, the primary action's treatment (a CTA the comp physically works, dissolves, or stamps is a signature element; its plain-rectangle rendition is contradicted), navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Three rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement; medium is part of the promise. GROUND: the page field's value and temperature against the comp's, sampled from pixels on both sides when tooling allows rather than judged from memory, and read as the net on-screen result where a texture or tile paints over the base color; a ground warmer or cooler than the comp's is contradicted however faithfully the layout matches, and drift toward the rendition prior (warm cream on light grounds, blue-black slate on dark) is the direction to hunt. With no approved comp, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality (CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never renders) as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. GROUND narrows rather than lapses: with no comp to sample, a color OWN-WORLD names is the target and the same warmer-or-cooler judgment applies; when OWN-WORLD names none, there is no GROUND authority, and the review says so in place of a verdict, because a target the reviewer invents turns the check into taste. A critique-reference comp on such a build is provocation, not spec: no element matrix, no adaptation citations, no asset obligations; its one contribution is what the image dared that the build did not, and dares worth adopting enter material_fixes as ordinary ordered fixes. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. A fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
+3. **Ceiling.** Against the QUALITY BAR card: name the world's native devices the build left unused, frame, depth, lettering treatment, ornament density, motion. The card governs commitment and finish, never composition.
+4. **Contract, promise by promise.** First verify FORM carries the seed key the concept roll printed; a contract with no seed key, or one the parent cannot corroborate, means the roll was skipped, a material fix ahead of any craft point. Then, for each of the five blocks: does the render keep the promise? Apply the memory test to the first viewport.
+5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every raster region of the spec shipped as its plate (the spec names the file; the page references it; the region's diff row is not `missing`), not a gradient, an inline SVG, or a many-vertex `clip-path` standing in for it, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind a wash is a compliance token, not a shipped material, and the detector's `buried-raster` and `organic-clip-path` findings in the packet are material fixes.
+6. **Floor.** Read the craft floor's Refuse list and hold the screenshots against it: kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces, gradient text, side stripes, and the rest. A banned element is a material fix even when it matches nothing in the comp: the builder loaded the same ban before writing it, and fidelity to a comp cannot authorize what the floor refuses. The parent's hook findings cover this mechanically where hooks run; this check exists because hookless harnesses reach you with none, and the last two live sessions shipped five kickers past a reviewer that never looked.
+
+Do not run a second detector pass; mechanical findings belong to the parent's hooks.
+
+## Disposition
+
+The first line of your return is `disposition: recapture`, `disposition: rebuild`, `disposition: fix`, or `disposition: ship`. These four words are the whole vocabulary; never invent another. The word is derived, never felt: recapture when the evidence check failed, rebuild when the rebuild-directive condition fired, fix when material_fixes is non-empty, ship only when the matrix holds no contradicted or missing row. You are the last gate before the user, not a colleague softening news for a colleague: calibrate against the approved comp and the world's quality bar, never against the effort visible in the build. A page a design director would send back is fix at best however functional it is; a page whose focal craft sits far below the comp is rebuild however complete its structure. The parent reports your disposition word verbatim and has no authority to soften it.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+Return the disposition line first, then exactly five sections: `persistence` (pass/fail with specifics), `fidelity` (the element matrix: match, adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval per salient element, adaptations citing their evidence, or "faithful"), `ceiling` (unused native devices, or "reached"), `material_fixes` (ordered, most material first, fidelity failures ahead of craft, each one line tied to a check or contract promise, at most eight), and `keep` (one line naming what must not be diluted while fixing). A recapture return replaces the five sections with the single `recapture` section from check 0. Missing inputs are named in one line above the sections. No praise, no summary prose.
+
+## Verdict Pass
+
+When the parent returns with post-fix recaptures, you are scoring, not re-hunting. Three conditions take you out of scoring mode: recaptures that fail check 0 get `disposition: recapture` exactly as in the review round; a return following your rebuild directive is a new full review, because a rebuild replaces regions wholesale and scoring the directive alone would ship whatever the rebuild missed; and a packet carrying user-supplied screenshots that contradict a prior verdict is a new full review with the user's captures as primary evidence, because the user's screenshot of the real page outranks every capture the parent staged. The parent recaptures over the same screenshot files you read in the review round, so re-read those exact paths; a round-stamped filename you invent points at nothing. The parent's narration of what was fixed is not evidence; a claimed fix you cannot see in the recaptures is unresolved. For each material fix from your review, one line: resolved, partial, or unresolved, tied to what the new screenshots visibly show; a fix answered mechanically, positions moved but the quality the finding named still absent, is partial at best. Then name at most three regressions the fix batch itself introduced, judged by the same matrix rules, and nothing else; no new hunt, no new checks. Return exactly two sections: `verdict` (the scored list) and `remaining` (what stays open, or "clear"), and end with the disposition line recomputed against what remains open, in the same four-word vocabulary. Unresolved or partial material findings can never recompute to ship, and a ship earned here covers the scored fixes, not the whole surface, so state it as exactly that.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/5fb9019041a849724f4bf6b5aff825670e00d8f289a7940de8150083d9182ad3

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Typography carries information, hierarchy, and voice. Improve it inside the established visual world; do not replace the identity unless the user asked to.
+
+---
+
+## Visitor mode
+
+- **Persuade + Experience:** display type may carry the voice. Use decisive contrast and responsive scale when the composition benefits.
+- **Operate + Read:** stability, scanability, and measure come first. A single well-tuned family and fixed role scale are often right.
+- **Native:** follow [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md), including platform scaling and accessibility behavior.
+
+If typography replacement would create a new identity, route through [new-work.md](new-work.md) and update DESIGN.md. Otherwise preserve confirmed families and improve their use.
+
+## Two isolated assessments
+
+When a sub-agent tool is available and permitted, run these independently; otherwise run them yourself in this order. Do not let detector findings anchor the design assessment.
+
+1. **Typographic assessment:** inspect representative pages and styles. Answer every question below with a file, selector, or computed value:
+   - **Authority and fit:** Which faces, weights, and roles are established? Do they fit the product and selected world, or are they unexamined defaults? Is every family necessary?
+   - **Hierarchy:** Can heading, body, label, metadata, and data roles be distinguished at a glance? Are adjacent sizes or weights too close to carry different jobs?
+   - **Scale and consistency:** Is there a deliberate role scale, or a collection of arbitrary values? Do repeated roles stay identical across screens and states?
+   - **Reading:** Does body copy stay within a comfortable 45–75 character measure? Are line height, paragraph rhythm, contrast, and tracking tuned to the actual face, width, language, and surface?
+   - **Stress:** What happens with long headings, localization expansion, zoom, narrow containers, missing weights, and font fallback?
+   - **Delivery:** Are only used assets loaded? Do fallback metrics, loading strategy, and variable-font settings avoid invisible text and disruptive reflow?
+2. **Mechanical scan:** run:
+
+```bash
+.qoder/skills/phoenix-ui/scripts/phoenix-ui detect --json --scope type [target files or dirs]
+```
+
+Also inspect dynamic or arbitrary font values the detector cannot interpret. Synthesize both assessments before editing, noting what each caught alone. A clean scan is a floor, not proof of good typography.
+
+## Set the system
+
+Before editing, state:
+
+- the roles the interface needs;
+- the intended contrast between those roles;
+- the reading measure and density;
+- which existing faces and weights are authoritative;
+- any performance, localization, or accessibility constraints.
+
+Use the fewest roles and families that make the hierarchy unmistakable. Combine size, weight, space, and tone deliberately instead of asking size alone to do all the work. Role names and tokens should describe purpose rather than values.
+
+## Apply
+
+- Keep body copy comfortably readable and zoomable. Use 1rem / 16px as the ordinary web body floor unless a dense role, platform convention, or user setting justifies otherwise.
+- Keep prose in the 45–75ch range. Tune line height inversely with measure: wider lines generally need more leading.
+- Compensate light text on dark surfaces on all three perceptual axes: slightly more line height, a touch more tracking, and one step more weight when the face needs it.
+- Tune line height to the face, width, language, and contrast, not a universal ratio.
+- Keep repeated roles consistent across screens and states.
+- Use numeric, tabular, code, and label features when their content benefits.
+- Load only used font assets and weights. Provide metric-compatible fallbacks and avoid blocking text.
+- Let marketing display type respond to available space when useful; keep dense product and reading surfaces spatially predictable.
+- Preserve browser zoom, user font settings, Dynamic Type, and platform text scaling.
+- Use paragraph spacing or first-line indentation as the primary paragraph rhythm; combining both usually double-marks the boundary.
+
+Do not make type decorative at the expense of comprehension, or introduce a second family without a clear role it alone can perform.
+
+## Verify
+
+- Primary, secondary, body, and metadata roles are recognizable without reading the copy.
+- Long text remains comfortable across relevant widths and languages.
+- The typography belongs to the product and its established world.
+- Loading does not create disruptive reflow or invisible text.
+- Zoom, text scaling, focus, contrast, and reduced viewport paths remain usable.
+- The final mechanical scan has no unexplained findings.
+
+Answer each item with rendered or source evidence, then rerun the scan. Do not substitute a bare “yes” for verification.
+
+When the hierarchy holds, hand off to `/phoenix-ui polish`.
+
+## Live-mode signature params
+
+Every variant declares a coarse `scale` parameter and authors its type ramp against `var(--p-scale, 1)`.
+
+```json
+{"id":"scale","kind":"range","min":0.85,"max":1.3,"step":0.05,"default":1,"label":"Scale"}
+```
+
+Add at most one pairing or weight parameter when it represents a real system choice. Follow [live.md](live.md)'s parameter contract.

package/vendor/phoenix-ui/bundle/blobs/60acc8fbee15ae3c37c635592ea2daf1327bb8e4c464ad24ca13342cd20b4398

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+Quiet design is harder than bold design. Subtlety needs precision. Reduce visual intensity in designs that are too loud, aggressive, or overstimulating without losing personality or making the result generic.
+
+---
+
+## Visitor mode
+
+Persuade + Experience: "quieter" means more restrained palette, more whitespace, more typographic air. Drama is reduced, not eliminated; the POV stays intact.
+
+Operate + Read: "quieter" means reducing visual noise. Fewer background accents, flatter cards, less color, less motion. The tool should disappear more completely into the task.
+
+---
+
+## Assess Current State
+
+Analyze what makes the design feel too intense:
+
+1. **Identify intensity sources**:
+   - **Color saturation**: Overly bright or saturated colors
+   - **Contrast extremes**: Too much high-contrast juxtaposition
+   - **Visual weight**: Too many bold, heavy elements competing
+   - **Animation excess**: Too much motion or overly dramatic effects
+   - **Complexity**: Too many visual elements, patterns, or decorations
+   - **Scale**: Everything is large and loud with no hierarchy
+
+2. **Understand the context**:
+   - What's the purpose? (Marketing vs tool vs reading experience)
+   - Who's the audience? (Some contexts need energy)
+   - What's working? (Don't throw away good ideas)
+   - What's the core message? (Preserve what matters)
+
+If any of these are unclear from the codebase, do not guess. STOP and call the ask_user_question tool to clarify.
+
+**CRITICAL**: "Quieter" doesn't mean boring or generic. It means refined and easier on the eyes. Think luxury, not laziness.
+
+## Plan Refinement
+
+Create a strategy to reduce intensity while maintaining impact:
+
+- **Color approach**: Desaturate or shift to more restrained tones?
+- **Hierarchy approach**: Which elements should stay bold (very few), which should recede?
+- **Simplification approach**: What can be removed entirely?
+- **Sophistication approach**: How can we signal quality through restraint?
+
+**IMPORTANT**: Subtlety requires precision. Quiet without intent collapses to generic.
+
+## Refine the Design
+
+Systematically reduce intensity across these dimensions:
+
+### Color Refinement
+- **Reduce saturation**: Shift from fully saturated to 70-85% saturation
+- **Soften palette**: Replace bright colors with muted tones
+- **Reduce color variety**: Use fewer colors more thoughtfully
+- **Neutral dominance**: Let neutrals do more work, use color as accent (10% rule)
+- **Gentler contrasts**: High contrast only where it matters most
+- **Tinted grays**: Use warm or cool tinted grays instead of pure gray. Adds depth without loudness
+- **Never gray on color**: If you have gray text on a colored background, use a darker shade of that color or transparency instead
+
+### Visual Weight Reduction
+- **Typography**: Reduce font weights (900 → 600, 700 → 500), decrease sizes where appropriate
+- **Hierarchy through subtlety**: Use weight, size, and space instead of color and boldness
+- **White space**: Increase breathing room, reduce density
+- **Borders & lines**: Reduce thickness, decrease opacity, or remove entirely
+
+### Simplification
+- **Remove decorative elements**: Gradients, shadows, patterns, textures that don't serve purpose
+- **Simplify shapes**: Reduce border radius extremes, simplify custom shapes
+- **Reduce layering**: Flatten visual hierarchy where possible
+- **Clean up effects**: Reduce or remove blur effects, glows, multiple shadows
+
+### Motion Reduction
+- **Reduce animation intensity**: Shorter distances (10-20px instead of 40px), gentler easing
+- **Remove decorative animations**: Keep functional motion, remove flourishes
+- **Subtle micro-interactions**: Replace dramatic effects with gentle feedback
+- **Refined easing**: Use ease-out-quart for smooth, understated motion. Never bounce or elastic
+- **Remove animations entirely** if they're not serving a clear purpose
+
+### Composition Refinement
+- **Reduce scale jumps**: Smaller contrast between sizes creates calmer feeling
+- **Align to grid**: Bring rogue elements back into systematic alignment
+- **Even out spacing**: Replace extreme spacing variations with consistent rhythm
+
+**NEVER**:
+- Make everything the same size/weight (hierarchy still matters)
+- Remove all color (quiet ≠ grayscale)
+- Eliminate all personality (maintain character through refinement)
+- Sacrifice usability for aesthetics (functional elements still need clear affordances)
+- Make everything small and light (some anchors needed)
+
+## Verify Quality
+
+Ensure refinement maintains quality:
+
+- **Still functional**: Can users still accomplish tasks easily?
+- **Still distinctive**: Does it have character, or is it generic now?
+- **Better reading**: Is text easier to read for extended periods?
+- **Restrained, not absent**: Does the POV survive the cuts?
+
+When the result feels right, hand off to `/phoenix-ui polish` for the final pass.