@xgent-ai/skills 0.6.0 → 0.7.0

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/6428239079f98fd6500e9fd032dd289b52052da7a4364ff357b0a5341b6444db

@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
-# Plan and asset review
-
-Use this checkpoint on comp-led builds once every raster region has its plate and the plates gate has scored them, before any page code exists. The approved comp is the reference. The user reviews two things: the plates that will ship, and the production plan for everything else, meaning which regions code draws. A painted region planned as code is the most expensive mistake a comp-led build makes, and this is where the user catches it. Text, controls and chrome are judged later, in the assembled first viewport.
-
-## Plan, capture, serve
-
-Run `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review plan`. It writes `.impeccable/review/components.json` from the measured spec, the comp and the plate files, and refuses, naming each one, while any raster region lacks its plate. Never write or edit that file for this stage: the packet is derived from the spec, so every change belongs in the regions file.
-
-If the harness exposes `component_review`, call it with `manifest_path` set to `.impeccable/review/components.json`. The host captures, presents the review and returns the user's decisions. A suspended request is waiting for the user; it is not a failed build or an approval.
-
-Otherwise run `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review capture --manifest .impeccable/review/components.json`, then start `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review serve --session <returned session>` in the background. Open the URL it prints in the available browser and wait for the user; `serve` exits 0 once they submit. Read the decisions with `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review status --session <id>`; `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable component-review verify --manifest .impeccable/review/components.json` confirms approval and refuses pending, needs-work and stale input. Never submit the page or write a receipt on the user's behalf.
-
-`serve` exits 2 when this session has no browser (the same signal as the decision page) and 4 when it closes after 30 idle minutes without a decision. Either way no one is reviewing: stop waiting, do not approve anything yourself, and do not build past this checkpoint. End the run and report the plan and asset review as pending with its session ID, so the user can resume it. A waiting review is pending work, not a completed build.
-
-## Act on the receipt
-
-Apply the user's decisions as given, never your own favorable verdict in their place.
-
-- **approve**: once every item is approved and the inventory is confirmed, advance to the hero.
-- **revise** (a plate): regenerate that plate at the same path with the user's feedback.
-- **revise with split** (an asset): replace that region in the regions file with its layers: a frame plate with a transparent opening (kind `plate`, same box), the content as its own `image` region at the opening's box, and each moving part (a shutter, a door) as its own plate. Name each layer after the original region, as `<id>-frame`, `<id>-view` or `<id>-shutter-left`, so the next round shows it as part of the user's request. Rerun `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>` and produce the plates.
-- **revise** (a plan item): change the regions file as the feedback says (resize or extend a raster region, split material into its own plate region, or adjust the code region), rerun `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce any new plates.
-- **reclassify** (a code region): in the regions file, change that region's `kind` to the one the user chose and rewrite its `note` to describe the material. Rerun `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, then produce the new plates, with the asset producer when subagents are available.
-- **missing**: add the region to the regions file, rerun `.veto/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --comp <comp.png> --regions <regions.json>`, and produce its plate if it is raster.
-
-Then run `plan`, `capture` and `serve` again. Unchanged decisions carry over, so the user sees only what changed. Any spec change, or a plate replaced after acceptance, needs a new round; the build-phase gate stays closed until the review of the current spec is accepted.
-
-## Assemble and review
-
-Build the first viewport from the approved plates and plan, and run the hero gate. Human review does not waive its integrity checks. After three failed hero attempts, stop iterating and present the first-viewport review with the current build; the user's eye settles what the readings could not.
-
-Present a second manifest at `.impeccable/review/hero.json`. You write this one, and its shape is fixed:
-
-```json
-{
-  "schemaVersion": 2,
-  "stage": "hero",
-  "id": "hero",
-  "title": "First viewport",
-  "comp": {"path": ".impeccable/mocks/comp.png", "width": 1536, "height": 1024},
-  "components": [{
-    "id": "first-viewport",
-    "name": "First viewport",
-    "medium": "HTML / CSS",
-    "note": "Assembled first viewport",
-    "box": {"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1},
-    "preview": {"kind": "page", "path": "index.html"},
-    "dependencies": ["styles.css", "assets/plates/sky.png", "fonts/display.woff2"]
-  }]
-}
-```
-
-- `schemaVersion` is 2. Version 3 is the plan review packet and requires stage `components`. `codeRegions` and `specSha256` exist only in version 3 and are refused here. `reviewGroup` is refused too: version 3 rejects it, and any other version accepts it only on a page preview in a `components`-stage manifest, never in a hero manifest.
-- `comp.path` is the `comp` value in `.impeccable/build/spec.json`, and `width` and `height` are that PNG's pixel size.
-- Exactly one component, with `box` exactly `{"x": 0, "y": 0, "w": 1, "h": 1}` and `name`, `medium` and `note` as strings.
-- `preview.path` is the page entry the build gates (`artifact` in `.impeccable/build/state.json`).
-- `dependencies` lists every other file the page loads (stylesheets, scripts, plates, images, fonts) as bare strings. Every path, here and above, is project-relative and plain: no leading `./` or `/`, no `..`, no URL, no `?`, `#`, `%`, `:` or backslash. A request to a file missing from this list, or to another host, fails the capture.
-
-The reference stays the approved comp. Call the same host review tool, or run `capture`, `serve` and `verify` with this manifest. Needs-work feedback starts another assembly round.
-
-Acceptance closes human review for this build: never request plan, asset or assembly approval again. While the page renders what the user accepted, the hero score, the palette check and every numeric reading are advisories; material vetoes still hold (a missing or unreferenced plate, an SVG illustration, an organic clip, a clipped plate, invented ink, failed rendered presence). When the capture no longer matches the accepted screenshot, restore what the user accepted; until then the readings apply. Complete the rest of the page, responsive behavior, finish checks and documentation with the accepted first viewport as the visual direction. This is first-viewport calibration, not a claim that the user reviewed the rest of the page. Shared stylesheet edits do not reopen approval. Preserve the accepted direction; a later explicit user change is a new task.
-
-Assembled-page capture executes inline and declared local scripts from the pinned inputs. Network APIs, frames and workers are unavailable; the initial viewport must settle before capture. Keep the real page and declare its scripts rather than removing behavior to pass review.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/647bab2f5cf6279d58d808f4df05d1ac63c1c86c6df9d13406ae776458653995

@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-<!-- Generated from skill/agents/ at build time. Do not edit; edit the agent definition. -->
-This harness has no subagent capability, so you are running this role inline. Step fully out of the work you just finished, adopt only this file's instructions for the pass, and disclose the substitution in one line when you report. Where the text below addresses a parent agent, you are both parties: produce the full output contract first, then act on it yourself.
-
-# Impeccable Asset Producer
-
-You are the asset production agent for Impeccable craft. Your job is production cleanup, not new art direction. Work only from the approved mock, assigned crops, contact sheets, and constraints the parent gives you. Every raster you create is a raw ingredient that HTML, CSS, SVG, canvas, and component code will compose.
-
-## Core Rule
-
-Do not redesign. Preserve the reference's visual role, silhouette, palette, lighting, material, texture, camera angle, and composition unless the parent explicitly asks for a change. Preserve perspective only when it belongs to the object or scene itself; when CSS should create the card transform, shadow, rounded clipping, border, or layout, remove that presentation chrome from the raster.
-
-## Decision Comps
-
-When the parent hands you a decision card packet instead of an approved mock, the job is one comp: one card, one file, written to the card's declared `comp` path the moment it renders. The parent runs several of you in parallel, one per card, so this card is your entire contract; generate first, plan never, because the file on disk is the deliverable and the decision page is waiting on it. Work from the card's structured fields and PRODUCT.md alone; report a card too thin to brief a comp, never pad it from imagination. Render the card's direction as a north-star comp at full fidelity: the requested surface's first viewport, prompt led by the surface's own structure (regions named in order with their scale relationships, never the world's atmosphere), fully committed in the card's own palette, type character, and material world. A native app or mobile-first surface is a portrait frame at its device viewport, never a landscape default. Every sibling renders at the same full fidelity in its own grammar, one surface, one aspect; equal commitment keeps the comparison honest. Real product name and real content only; never invent commercial claims, prices, benchmarks, or dates PRODUCT.md does not carry. Exclusions bind those claims, never a medium the card's own world has not excluded: a subject that lives in photographs keeps its photographs. Write the prompt sidecar beside the file. Return one line naming the path and any deviation, nothing more. Everything below this section is the asset-production job; none of it applies to a decision-comp run.
-
-## Review handoff
-
-Return the actual files and any unresolved drift to the parent for the user's plan and asset review in [component-review.md](../component-review.md). A parent or automatic visual check is not a substitute for that human checkpoint. The parent may call you again after it: for regions the user reclassified from code to raster (the spec now lists them with a plate path), or for plates the user asked to revise, with their feedback as the prompt notes. Produce only those, preserve unchanged assets, and hand off real files as before; never self-approve. This checkpoint does not apply to the Decision Comps job above.
-
-## Input Contract
-
-Expect the measured spec (`.impeccable/build/spec.json`, written by `impeccable comp-spec` from the approved comp), the approved comp path, and the skill scripts path. Optionally: a subset of region ids to produce, extra prompt notes per region, and format or transparency needs. Everything else you need is in the spec: each raster region's id, kind (plate, image, texture), pixel box, sampled palette, aspect, note, and the plate path it must land on.
-
-If there is no spec, stop and return one line asking the parent to run `impeccable comp-spec` first. You do not inventory the comp yourself; the spec is the inventory, and a second inventory disagrees with the first.
-
-## The job
-
-Every region with `medium: raster` in the spec ships as a plate at its `plate` path. A plate is the region regenerated at asset resolution from the comp crop as reference: same subject, same composition, same palette, same lighting and material, with the UI text and page chrome removed, at 1.5x the comp region's pixel size or more. The page draws text, controls, radius, shadow, and layout in code; the plate carries what code cannot draw. Crops from the comp are references, never shipping pixels: a comp is reference grade and a shipped crop is how a beautiful comp becomes a blurry site.
-
-Per region, in the spec's order:
-
-1. `.agent/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --crop <id>` writes the reference crop under `.impeccable/build/crops/`.
-2. Choose the background from the approved region: an isolated figure, object, or line drawing on the page ground is a **transparent cutout**; a photograph, full-frame illustration, or texture stays **opaque**. Save `.agent/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable comp-spec --plate-prompt <id> --background transparent` to a UTF-8 prompt file for a cutout; use `--background opaque` otherwise. The transparent prompt preserves reference placement and clear margins, white paint, fine edges, and interior holes.
-3. Produce the plate at its exact spec `plate` path. Create the output directory first and choose a supported output size matching the region's aspect, at least 1.5x its pixel dimensions. Prefer the harness-native image tool with the crop as input and the saved prompt; request a transparent PNG for cutouts, then run `.agent/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable embed-prompt <plate> --prompt-file <prompt.txt>` (if you refine the prompt, save and embed the exact text sent). With the API fallback, run `.agent/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable generate-image --ref <crop.png> --prompt-file <prompt.txt> --out <plate.png> --size <WxH> --quality high --background transparent` for a cutout, or `--background opaque` otherwise. The API fallback embeds the prompt and records the background in the sidecar. The output must be PNG; the fallback requests native alpha and performs no chroma-keying.
-4. Open the plate beside the crop and compare subject, placement, scale, palette, and style. For cutouts, verify a real alpha channel and inspect composites on light and dark grounds: white paint must stay solid, interior holes must clear, and fine edges must avoid halos. Inspect glass and soft shadows carefully; partial alpha alone does not ensure convincing translucency. Never chroma-key native transparent output or flatten it before saving. If a native tool returns opaque pixels or a painted checkerboard, retry with the API fallback when available; otherwise report the transparency blocker. On a visual miss, tighten the prompt and regenerate once. Two misses on one region: keep the better plate, mark it `needs_parent_review`, and name the drift. The parent runs the plates gate after all assets exist; report `unscored` until a gate score is available.
-5. A frame plate (a window, a doorway, an arch) is a transparent cutout with an opening: generate it with a transparent background and keep the opening fully transparent. Verify the alpha inside the opening before saving: no baked view, no glow or vignette halo across it. The content seen through the opening is its own image region; produce it separately at the opening's size.
-
-Do not redesign. Do not add objects, restyle, or reinterpret; the comp was approved as it is. Do not touch the page code, the spec, or the comp. Do not produce anything the spec does not list; a region the parent forgot goes back as a one-line note, not a plate.
-
-## Output Contract
-
-Return one line per raster region: `<id> <plate path> <WxH> <score%|unscored> <accepted|needs_parent_review|blocked> <one-line note or ->`. Then `blockers` (missing spec, missing comp, no image capability, exhausted key) and `assumptions`, each global and minimal. Nothing else: no summary, no praise, no implementation advice. The parent runs `impeccable build-phase advance` to verify the plates against the same spec; a visual acceptance does not override a failing gate.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/64802d14087fc96b38ef3881fef8098b36068d07f3b942031637b18eef3dd2af

@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
-Layout turns product priority into reading order, grouping, rhythm, and usable space. Diagnose the structural problem before moving boxes.
-
----
-
-## Visitor mode
-
-- **Persuade + Experience:** composition may be asymmetric, fluid, or intentionally disruptive when the selected world earns it.
-- **Operate + Read:** predictable structure, stable density, and navigable linearity are affordances.
-- **Native:** follow [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md) for navigation, insets, adaptation, and touch targets.
-
-Preserve the established visual world. A layout command changes structure inside it; identity replacement belongs to [new-work.md](new-work.md).
-
-## Two isolated assessments
-
-When a sub-agent tool is available and permitted, run these independently; otherwise run them yourself in this order.
-
-1. **Layout assessment:** inspect representative states and viewports. Answer every question below with rendered or source evidence:
-   - **Reading order:** Apply the squint test. With detail blurred, can you still identify the primary element, the secondary element, and the major groups in order?
-   - **Grouping:** Are related items close and distinct groups separated, or are containers compensating for weak proximity?
-   - **Rhythm:** Do tight and generous intervals create a deliberate cadence, or is one spacing value repeated until everything has equal weight?
-   - **Structure:** Does the topology match the content and task? Are repeated cards, columns, or sections genuinely equivalent, or merely a framework default?
-   - **Density:** Does the amount of information per region fit use frequency, decision complexity, and visitor mode?
-   - **Adaptation:** At narrow, intermediate, wide, zoomed, and localized states, what reorders, collapses, wraps, scrolls, or remains fixed? Does DOM and focus order still agree with the visual order?
-   - **Extremes:** Do long content, empty states, overlays, sticky elements, safe areas, and small touch targets expose structural failures?
-2. **Mechanical scan:** run:
-
-```bash
-.claude/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable detect --json --scope layout [target files or dirs]
-```
-
-Also inspect arbitrary spacing, overflow, stacking, and container behavior the detector cannot resolve. Keep mechanical evidence out of the first assessment, then synthesize both passes before editing. A clean scan cannot prove hierarchy or rhythm.
-
-## Set the spatial thesis
-
-Before editing, name:
-
-- the primary reading or task path;
-- what belongs together and what must separate;
-- which element leads and which supports;
-- the intended density and spacing rhythm;
-- how the structure changes across containers, viewports, input modes, and content extremes.
-
-Choose the simplest structural model that expresses those relationships. Use layout primitives according to the relationships they control, and name reusable spacing and container roles semantically.
-
-## Apply
-
-- Group by meaning. Use proximity before adding containers or decoration.
-- Create rhythm through deliberate contrast between tight and generous intervals.
-- Use a documented spacing scale rather than one-off values. A 4-unit base usually provides the useful middle steps that an 8-only scale misses.
-- Let hierarchy follow product priority, not framework defaults.
-- Keep distinct content visually distinct without turning every group into an isolated component.
-- Make responsive behavior structural: reorder, collapse, reflow, or reveal based on what remains important.
-- Prefer container-aware components when the same component appears in different contexts.
-- Use `gap` for sibling rhythm when it expresses the relationship more directly than child margins.
-- Keep touch targets usable even when their visible marks are small.
-- Use depth only when it clarifies state or hierarchy.
-- Make optical corrections only after inspecting the rendered result.
-
-Variation is not a goal by itself. Repetition should support recognition; break it only when content or priority changes.
-
-## Verify
-
-- The squint test still reveals the primary, secondary, and major groups in order.
-- The reading and task path remains clear at every supported size.
-- Related content groups naturally; unrelated content does not blur together.
-- Tight and generous spacing create intentional rhythm instead of monotonous repetition.
-- Density matches use frequency and content complexity.
-- Long text, empty states, localization, zoom, and dynamic content do not break the structure.
-- Keyboard, touch, and assistive-technology order agree with the visual order.
-- The final mechanical scan has no unexplained findings.
-
-Answer each item with rendered or source evidence, then rerun the scan. Do not substitute a bare “yes” for verification.
-
-When the structure holds, hand off to `/impeccable polish`.
-
-## Live-mode signature params
-
-Every variant declares a coarse `density` parameter and authors spacing against `var(--p-density, 1)`.
-
-```json
-{"id":"density","kind":"range","min":0.6,"max":1.4,"step":0.05,"default":1,"label":"Density"}
-```
-
-Add one structural parameter only when the topology genuinely branches. Follow [live.md](live.md)'s parameter contract.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/64807d8f43267f4ed879e997834bbf793bd4605ba1dc65f4b545324b660a7063

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
-Typography carries information, hierarchy, and voice. Improve it inside the established visual world; do not replace the identity unless the user asked to.
-
----
-
-## Visitor mode
-
-- **Persuade + Experience:** display type may carry the voice. Use decisive contrast and responsive scale when the composition benefits.
-- **Operate + Read:** stability, scanability, and measure come first. A single well-tuned family and fixed role scale are often right.
-- **Native:** follow [ios.md](ios.md) or [android.md](android.md), including platform scaling and accessibility behavior.
-
-If typography replacement would create a new identity, route through [new-work.md](new-work.md) and update DESIGN.md. Otherwise preserve confirmed families and improve their use.
-
-## Two isolated assessments
-
-When a sub-agent tool is available and permitted, run these independently; otherwise run them yourself in this order. Do not let detector findings anchor the design assessment.
-
-1. **Typographic assessment:** inspect representative pages and styles. Answer every question below with a file, selector, or computed value:
-   - **Authority and fit:** Which faces, weights, and roles are established? Do they fit the product and selected world, or are they unexamined defaults? Is every family necessary?
-   - **Hierarchy:** Can heading, body, label, metadata, and data roles be distinguished at a glance? Are adjacent sizes or weights too close to carry different jobs?
-   - **Scale and consistency:** Is there a deliberate role scale, or a collection of arbitrary values? Do repeated roles stay identical across screens and states?
-   - **Reading:** Does body copy stay within a comfortable 45–75 character measure? Are line height, paragraph rhythm, contrast, and tracking tuned to the actual face, width, language, and surface?
-   - **Stress:** What happens with long headings, localization expansion, zoom, narrow containers, missing weights, and font fallback?
-   - **Delivery:** Are only used assets loaded? Do fallback metrics, loading strategy, and variable-font settings avoid invisible text and disruptive reflow?
-2. **Mechanical scan:** run:
-
-```bash
-.hermes/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable detect --json --scope type [target files or dirs]
-```
-
-Also inspect dynamic or arbitrary font values the detector cannot interpret. Synthesize both assessments before editing, noting what each caught alone. A clean scan is a floor, not proof of good typography.
-
-## Set the system
-
-Before editing, state:
-
-- the roles the interface needs;
-- the intended contrast between those roles;
-- the reading measure and density;
-- which existing faces and weights are authoritative;
-- any performance, localization, or accessibility constraints.
-
-Use the fewest roles and families that make the hierarchy unmistakable. Combine size, weight, space, and tone deliberately instead of asking size alone to do all the work. Role names and tokens should describe purpose rather than values.
-
-## Apply
-
-- Keep body copy comfortably readable and zoomable. Use 1rem / 16px as the ordinary web body floor unless a dense role, platform convention, or user setting justifies otherwise.
-- Keep prose in the 45–75ch range. Tune line height inversely with measure: wider lines generally need more leading.
-- Compensate light text on dark surfaces on all three perceptual axes: slightly more line height, a touch more tracking, and one step more weight when the face needs it.
-- Tune line height to the face, width, language, and contrast, not a universal ratio.
-- Keep repeated roles consistent across screens and states.
-- Use numeric, tabular, code, and label features when their content benefits.
-- Load only used font assets and weights. Provide metric-compatible fallbacks and avoid blocking text.
-- Let marketing display type respond to available space when useful; keep dense product and reading surfaces spatially predictable.
-- Preserve browser zoom, user font settings, Dynamic Type, and platform text scaling.
-- Use paragraph spacing or first-line indentation as the primary paragraph rhythm; combining both usually double-marks the boundary.
-
-Do not make type decorative at the expense of comprehension, or introduce a second family without a clear role it alone can perform.
-
-## Verify
-
-- Primary, secondary, body, and metadata roles are recognizable without reading the copy.
-- Long text remains comfortable across relevant widths and languages.
-- The typography belongs to the product and its established world.
-- Loading does not create disruptive reflow or invisible text.
-- Zoom, text scaling, focus, contrast, and reduced viewport paths remain usable.
-- The final mechanical scan has no unexplained findings.
-
-Answer each item with rendered or source evidence, then rerun the scan. Do not substitute a bare “yes” for verification.
-
-When the hierarchy holds, hand off to `/impeccable polish`.
-
-## Live-mode signature params
-
-Every variant declares a coarse `scale` parameter and authors its type ramp against `var(--p-scale, 1)`.
-
-```json
-{"id":"scale","kind":"range","min":0.85,"max":1.3,"step":0.05,"default":1,"label":"Scale"}
-```
-
-Add at most one pairing or weight parameter when it represents a real system choice. Follow [live.md](live.md)'s parameter contract.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/6528f2aebe4a425b724de293c8f6dc8a42ca80c7f1ed3039b8b9a813b004956a

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
----
-name: impeccable
-description: Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
-version: 4.5.0
-user-invocable: true
-argument-hint: "[shape · audit|critique · animate|bolder|colorize|delight|layout|overdrive|quieter|typeset · adapt|clarify|distill · harden|onboard|optimize|polish · init|document|extract|live|generate] [target]"
-license: Apache 2.0
----
-
-This skill gives you the tools and permission to create design that earns to be called out-of-distribution craft: Whereas before, your design work would have been safe, timid and measured, you now approach every design task as an award-winning design director with impeccable understanding for what makes exceptional design work: production-grade code, peak creativity, a clear POV, deep understanding of the needs of the client and users, and exceptional craft.
-
-Core principles:
-- Go all out. No hedging, no shortcuts. The deliverable must be complete (except assets the user must provide).
-- Dream big and bold. Distinct, beautiful, outstanding and highly inspiring work.
-- Verify in bounded passes, not a loop, and the ceiling covers the whole cycle: screenshots, defect scans, micro-edits, and rebuilds alike. Build fully, inspect once with a batched round (desktop and mobile together on the web; the shipped device classes on a native platform), fix everything it shows in one batch, confirm with at most one more round, and stop polishing. Open-ended self-QA burns the user's money doing worse what the finish handoffs do better.
-
-## Setup
-
-1. Run `<skill-base-dir>/scripts/impeccable context` once per session, where `<skill-base-dir>` is the directory that contains this SKILL.md (the skill folder, not a plugin root two levels above it); keep cwd at the user's project. That base directory resolves every `.github/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable <verb>` command in this skill and its references, and `.github/skills/impeccable/scripts` is the fallback only when the runtime reports no base directory. On a Windows shell without `sh`, call `.github/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable.cmd` instead. The launcher runs a self-contained binary that ships next to it or is downloaded once on first run; no Node or other runtime is required. Pass a named source file or route as `--target <path>`. It loads PRODUCT.md, DESIGN.md, the matching surface brief, and native-platform guidance when applicable; follow its directives and do not rerun it.
-2. Load the request's playbook: its Commands-table reference for an explicit/implied sub-command, or [reference/new-work.md](reference/new-work.md) for a new surface or replacement visual world. Inspect target and incumbent visual truth before editing. When the app cannot run, start with committed visual-regression goldens or screenshot fixtures; verify target and freshness against current tokens, CSS, components, or assets, resolve conflicts, and compare theme/variant captures.
-3. After resolving analysis and direction, read [reference/craft-floor.md](reference/craft-floor.md) immediately before any UI edit, including small refinements. It carries the quality floor, the absolute bans, and the reflexes no detector catches. Do not load it for planning-only work.
-
-**Launcher unavailable:** On refusal or failure, send a separate message **before the next tool call**: “Context loading did not run; I’ll read the existing project context directly.” Then read existing PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md without inventing missing context, follow applicable steps 2–3, and continue through permitted tools. This applies to planning and editing; launcher failure alone does not block either.
-
-## How to design
-
-- **The brief wins.** Honor pinned aesthetics, eras, materials, fonts, and palettes even when they conflict with a saturated-pattern warning. Redirecting a clear brief toward your taste is failure.
-- **Refinement preserves; redesign replaces.** Refinement keeps the incumbent identity, behavior, copy, and everything outside scope. Ask before replacing factual copy or adding claims. Redesign keeps product truth, content, function, native affordances, and constraints, but treats the old look as evidence and anti-reference; choose a replacement world in new-work and replace DESIGN.md. Never split the difference into polish on the discarded look.
-- **Visual authority is evidence, not a filename.** Missing DESIGN.md alone does not make a project greenfield; new-work decides whether to preserve, expand, or replace the incumbent world.
-
-## Modes
-
-The mode names what the visitor's success looks like on this surface.
-
-- **Persuade:** the visitor decides and acts; design is the product. Landing pages, marketing, campaigns, pricing. Earn attention and action. Ship real imagery when the brief needs it; follow the committed world, not category habit.
-- **Operate:** the visitor completes a task. App UI, dashboards, editors, admin, settings, tools. Scanability, consistency, native expectations, and the real usage scene outrank expression. Brand lives in precise details.
-- **Read:** the visitor understands something. Docs, articles, guides, help, changelogs. Structure for comprehension, then make the reading experience worth staying in.
-- **Experience:** the visitor is inside the work itself. Portfolios, galleries, showcases. Let the artifact lead from the first viewport; the interface recedes.
-
-Choose the mode from the requested surface, not the product, and persist it only in that surface brief. A tool's landing page is still Persuade; a fashion house's documentation is still Read; a docs index is Read, not Persuade. See [new-work.md](reference/new-work.md) for new surfaces and [operate.md](reference/operate.md) for deeper Operate/Read guidance.
-
-## Commands
-
-| Command | Category | Description | Reference |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| `craft [feature]` | Build | Deprecated alias for an ordinary new-work request | [reference/craft.md](reference/craft.md) |
-| `shape [feature]` | Build | Plan UX/UI before writing code | [reference/shape.md](reference/shape.md) |
-| `init` | Build | Capture durable product context in PRODUCT.md | [reference/init.md](reference/init.md) |
-| `document` | Build | Generate DESIGN.md from existing project code | [reference/document.md](reference/document.md) |
-| `extract [target]` | Build | Pull reusable tokens and components into design system | [reference/extract.md](reference/extract.md) |
-| `critique [target]` | Evaluate | UX design review with heuristic scoring | [reference/critique.md](reference/critique.md) |
-| `audit [target]` | Evaluate | Technical quality checks (a11y, perf, responsive) | [reference/audit.md](reference/audit.md) · native: [reference/audit.native.md](reference/audit.native.md) |
-| `polish [target]` | Refine | Final quality pass before shipping | [reference/polish.md](reference/polish.md) |
-| `bolder [target]` | Refine | Amplify safe or bland designs | [reference/bolder.md](reference/bolder.md) |
-| `quieter [target]` | Refine | Tone down aggressive or overstimulating designs | [reference/quieter.md](reference/quieter.md) |
-| `distill [target]` | Refine | Strip to essence, remove complexity | [reference/distill.md](reference/distill.md) |
-| `harden [target]` | Refine | Production-ready: errors, i18n, edge cases | [reference/harden.md](reference/harden.md) |
-| `onboard [target]` | Refine | Design first-run flows, empty states, activation | [reference/onboard.md](reference/onboard.md) |
-| `animate [target]` | Enhance | Add purposeful animations and motion | [reference/animate.md](reference/animate.md) |
-| `colorize [target]` | Enhance | Add strategic color to monochromatic UIs | [reference/colorize.md](reference/colorize.md) |
-| `typeset [target]` | Enhance | Improve typography hierarchy and fonts | [reference/typeset.md](reference/typeset.md) |
-| `layout [target]` | Enhance | Fix spacing, rhythm, and visual hierarchy | [reference/layout.md](reference/layout.md) |
-| `delight [target]` | Enhance | Add personality and memorable touches | [reference/delight.md](reference/delight.md) |
-| `overdrive [target]` | Enhance | Push past conventional limits | [reference/overdrive.md](reference/overdrive.md) |
-| `clarify [target]` | Fix | Improve UX copy, labels, and error messages | [reference/clarify.md](reference/clarify.md) |
-| `adapt [target]` | Fix | Adapt for different devices and screen sizes | [reference/adapt.md](reference/adapt.md) · native: [reference/adapt.native.md](reference/adapt.native.md) |
-| `optimize [target]` | Fix | Diagnose and fix UI performance | [reference/optimize.md](reference/optimize.md) |
-| `live` | Iterate | Visual variant mode: pick elements in the browser, iterate on alternatives | [reference/live.md](reference/live.md) |
-| `generate [n] [action] [element]` | Iterate | Variants, versions, or alternatives of a named element to choose from in the live browser; no manual picking | [reference/generate.md](reference/generate.md) |
-
-Routing:
-
-- **No argument:** read [routing.md](reference/routing.md) and present its context-aware menu; never auto-run a command.
-- **Explicit or clearly implied request to run a command:** load its reference (native variant on native platforms) and follow it. Ask once if two commands fit.
-- **Workflow or command-selection question:** read [Workflow questions](reference/routing.md#workflow-questions).
-- **Otherwise:** treat the request as general design work. Missing PRODUCT.md routes a new surface or replacement world through init, then new-work; a narrow refinement of existing code proceeds on the incumbent implementation as `impeccable context` directs, offering init afterward rather than blocking on it.
-- `teach` aliases `init`. `craft` is a deprecated alias for ordinary new-work and adds nothing. `shape` owns task discovery, then enters new-work only for visual-world and surface-concept decisions.
-
-After init writes PRODUCT.md, resume without rerunning `impeccable context`; init loads the native platform reference itself when the platform it recorded is `ios`, `android`, or `adaptive`.
-
-**Pin / Unpin:** `.github/skills/impeccable/scripts/impeccable pin <pin|unpin> <command>` creates or removes a standalone `/<command>` shortcut. Report the script's result concisely; relay stderr verbatim on error.
-
-**Hooks:** `/impeccable hooks <on|off|status|ignore-rule|ignore-file|ignore-value|reset>` manages the design detector hook for this project (auto-runs the detector after UI file edits and surfaces findings). Load [reference/hooks.md](reference/hooks.md) when the user invokes it with any argument.
-
-**Doctor:** `/impeccable doctor` reports and repairs drift between this project's Impeccable artifacts (PRODUCT.md, DESIGN.md and its sidecar, config, surface briefs, the hook) and what this version reads. Load [reference/doctor.md](reference/doctor.md) when the user invokes it, or when they ask what is out of date, stale, or needs refreshing. A `CONTEXT_STALE` directive in Setup's output is the cheap subset of the same report; act on it there per its own instructions rather than running doctor unasked.
-
-**Never repair drift as a side effect of a design task.** A `CONTEXT_STALE` finding is reported, not acted on, unless the user asks. The one exception is a finding marked `auto`, which the next write to that file performs anyway.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/6575a657642ccdab42d0743ceaee06621c77811b4dc4f21c616e28aabf5e28ef

@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
----
-name: impeccable-finish-reviewer
-description: Reviews a finished Impeccable build against its direction contract, the approved comp, and the chosen world's quality bar, returning an ordered list of material fixes.
-model: inherit
-readonly: true
-is_background: false
----
-# Impeccable Finish Reviewer
-
-You are the finishing reviewer for an Impeccable build: fresh eyes on a done artifact, outside the build thread's attention gravity. You edit nothing; the parent applies your fixes.
-
-You have no browser. Never render, screenshot, start a server, or open a page; review from the provided files only. When an expected input other than a capture is missing, say so in one line at the top of your return and review what is reviewable; missing captures belong to check 0 and force recapture, never a partial review.
-
-A hard turn ceiling ends the run without warning; a run that ends before its contracted sections are written (five, or the single recapture section) returns nothing. Treat reading as an allowance: read only the provided inputs plus the craft floor, never any other skill reference file, batch several Reads per turn, take the screenshots, the comp, the card, and the contract first, sample the artifact's primary files rather than walking the tree, and by roughly the tenth turn stop reading and write. Name whatever went unread in the line above the sections.
-
-## Input Contract
-
-Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); the screenshots the parent captured, in `.impeccable/review/` (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: device-class names such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive). A screenshot path the calling brief names is authoritative when the file exists; `.impeccable/review/` is where to look when the brief names none or a named path is missing, never a filename you invent. Also expect: the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); the PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths; on a comp-led build the approved comp path (a code-led build has none; it passes the chosen decision comp as a separate critique-reference input, labeled as such, and nothing here that binds "the approved comp" binds it); on a comp-led build the build state (`.impeccable/build/state.json`), the measured spec (`.impeccable/build/spec.json`), and the diff directories `.impeccable/review/diff/hero/` and `.impeccable/review/diff/final/` (each holds `side-by-side.png`, `heatmap.png`, `regions/<id>.png` paired crops, and `report.json` with per-region scores and verdicts from `impeccable comp-diff`); and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. On a native (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) build the packet adds the platform reference path(s) (`reference/ios.md` / `reference/android.md`) and a line saying no detector ran: read the platform reference alongside the craft floor, judge every check in the platform's own conventions, treat the screenshots as device captures, and know your floor check is the build's only slop gate. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
-
-## Checks, in order
-
-0. **Evidence.** Before any other check, verify the required captures exist and every capture is valid. Required: the platform's full viewport set (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: one capture per shipped device class), plus every capture the calling brief names as required, a reported user viewport (`user-<width>.png`) included. Valid: no black or blank regions, content matching what the filename claims (a visit capture showing the About section is invalid), the document top visible where the file claims a full page, dimensions that make sense for the named viewport. A required capture that is absent fails exactly like one that is malformed: a viewport nobody captured is a viewport nobody inspected, and it cannot ship. When any capture fails, the whole review changes shape: return `disposition: recapture` as the first line, then one section, `recapture`, listing each missing or invalid file and what a valid capture of it shows, and stop. Never build a matrix on malformed evidence; a verdict derived from a broken capture launders the breakage into an approval, and the parent owes you a full re-review on valid captures, not a scoring round.
-1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. On a comp-led build, `.impeccable/build/state.json` exists and every phase before `review` is `closed` or explicitly `skipped`; an open or failed phase is a material finding. A comp-led config with no state file, or a state whose `comps` phase is neither `closed` nor `skipped`, means the comp round was skipped and the build ran from a world description alone, a material finding that outranks craft; a phase closed with a `forced` record is disclosed as a material finding unless the user downgraded the comp in words the packet quotes; a state file whose `hero.gate.score` sits under 0.72, or a missing state file, means the reproduction ran unproven, a material finding, and `.impeccable/review/hero-repro.png` must exist either way. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comp-round comps exist under `.impeccable/mocks/`, an approval record exists too: the surface brief naming the approved comp, or an `approved` flag in its sidecar. Comp-round comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, a material finding. Files under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` are exempt: they are the direction round's dealt hand, produced before any comp round, and imply no approval whatever the build path; a code-led build has no comp round at all.
-2. **Fidelity.** Start from the measurement, then judge what it cannot: read `.impeccable/review/diff/final/report.json` (and hero) first; every region scored `missing` or `contradicted` is a matrix row in that state unless the paired crop under `regions/` shows the score is wrong, and you say why; a region scored `match` still gets your eye for lettering character and material, which the numbers do not measure. Then, against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, the primary action's treatment (a CTA the comp physically works, dissolves, or stamps is a signature element; its plain-rectangle rendition is contradicted), navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Three rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement; medium is part of the promise. GROUND: the page field's value and temperature against the comp's, sampled from pixels on both sides when tooling allows rather than judged from memory, and read as the net on-screen result where a texture or tile paints over the base color; a ground warmer or cooler than the comp's is contradicted however faithfully the layout matches, and drift toward the rendition prior (warm cream on light grounds, blue-black slate on dark) is the direction to hunt. With no approved comp, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality (CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never renders) as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. GROUND narrows rather than lapses: with no comp to sample, a color OWN-WORLD names is the target and the same warmer-or-cooler judgment applies; when OWN-WORLD names none, there is no GROUND authority, and the review says so in place of a verdict, because a target the reviewer invents turns the check into taste. A critique-reference comp on such a build is provocation, not spec: no element matrix, no adaptation citations, no asset obligations; its one contribution is what the image dared that the build did not, and dares worth adopting enter material_fixes as ordinary ordered fixes. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. A fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
-3. **Ceiling.** Against the QUALITY BAR card: name the world's native devices the build left unused, frame, depth, lettering treatment, ornament density, motion. The card governs commitment and finish, never composition.
-4. **Contract, promise by promise.** First verify FORM carries the seed key the concept roll printed; a contract with no seed key, or one the parent cannot corroborate, means the roll was skipped, a material fix ahead of any craft point. Then, for each of the five blocks: does the render keep the promise? Apply the memory test to the first viewport.
-5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every raster region of the spec shipped as its plate (the spec names the file; the page references it; the region's diff row is not `missing`), not a gradient, an inline SVG, or a many-vertex `clip-path` standing in for it, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind a wash is a compliance token, not a shipped material, and the detector's `buried-raster` and `organic-clip-path` findings in the packet are material fixes.
-6. **Floor.** Read the craft floor's Refuse list and hold the screenshots against it: kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces, gradient text, side stripes, and the rest. A banned element is a material fix even when it matches nothing in the comp: the builder loaded the same ban before writing it, and fidelity to a comp cannot authorize what the floor refuses. The parent's hook findings cover this mechanically where hooks run; this check exists because hookless harnesses reach you with none, and the last two live sessions shipped five kickers past a reviewer that never looked.
-
-Do not run a second detector pass; mechanical findings belong to the parent's hooks.
-
-## Disposition
-
-The first line of your return is `disposition: recapture`, `disposition: rebuild`, `disposition: fix`, or `disposition: ship`. These four words are the whole vocabulary; never invent another. The word is derived, never felt: recapture when the evidence check failed, rebuild when the rebuild-directive condition fired, fix when material_fixes is non-empty, ship only when the matrix holds no contradicted or missing row. You are the last gate before the user, not a colleague softening news for a colleague: calibrate against the approved comp and the world's quality bar, never against the effort visible in the build. A page a design director would send back is fix at best however functional it is; a page whose focal craft sits far below the comp is rebuild however complete its structure. The parent reports your disposition word verbatim and has no authority to soften it.
-
-## Output Contract
-
-Return the disposition line first, then exactly five sections: `persistence` (pass/fail with specifics), `fidelity` (the element matrix: match, adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval per salient element, adaptations citing their evidence, or "faithful"), `ceiling` (unused native devices, or "reached"), `material_fixes` (ordered, most material first, fidelity failures ahead of craft, each one line tied to a check or contract promise, at most eight), and `keep` (one line naming what must not be diluted while fixing). A recapture return replaces the five sections with the single `recapture` section from check 0. Missing inputs are named in one line above the sections. No praise, no summary prose.
-
-## Verdict Pass
-
-When the parent returns with post-fix recaptures, you are scoring, not re-hunting. Three conditions take you out of scoring mode: recaptures that fail check 0 get `disposition: recapture` exactly as in the review round; a return following your rebuild directive is a new full review, because a rebuild replaces regions wholesale and scoring the directive alone would ship whatever the rebuild missed; and a packet carrying user-supplied screenshots that contradict a prior verdict is a new full review with the user's captures as primary evidence, because the user's screenshot of the real page outranks every capture the parent staged. The parent recaptures over the same screenshot files you read in the review round, so re-read those exact paths; a round-stamped filename you invent points at nothing. The parent's narration of what was fixed is not evidence; a claimed fix you cannot see in the recaptures is unresolved. For each material fix from your review, one line: resolved, partial, or unresolved, tied to what the new screenshots visibly show; a fix answered mechanically, positions moved but the quality the finding named still absent, is partial at best. Then name at most three regressions the fix batch itself introduced, judged by the same matrix rules, and nothing else; no new hunt, no new checks. Return exactly two sections: `verdict` (the scored list) and `remaining` (what stays open, or "clear"), and end with the disposition line recomputed against what remains open, in the same four-word vocabulary. Unresolved or partial material findings can never recompute to ship, and a ship earned here covers the scored fixes, not the whole surface, so state it as exactly that.

package/vendor/impeccable/bundle/blobs/66d60356172ccafdd334fca9bf33243c8409216a733dcde0d66a24fd70ee8132

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-0.1.11