@wazir-dev/cli 1.3.0 → 1.4.0

package/docs/research/2026-03-20-agents/a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+{"parentUuid":null,"isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":"Research ONLY — no code. How do frameworks handle phase failures and retries?\n\nResearch:\n1. CrewAI guardrail_max_retries — what happens after max retries? Hard exception?\n2. LangGraph error handling — what happens when a node fails? Does it retry? How?\n3. Temporal retry policies — exponential backoff, max attempts, non-retryable errors\n4. Symphony retry — RetryQueued state, max dispatch attempts\n\nFor Wazir: if a phase subagent produces bad output (guardrail rejects):\n- Re-spawn the same subagent with error feedback?\n- Spawn a different model (escalate from Sonnet to Opus)?\n- Escalate to human?\n- How many retries before giving up?\n- What state to preserve across retries?\n\nOutput: Retry and escalation strategy for Wazir's phase controller."},"uuid":"f90b13a2-139b-4853-9209-d5299617c5a7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:31.539Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f90b13a2-139b-4853-9209-d5299617c5a7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012KJHtAtUNdXfVZXgYJdHM8","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nI'll research how each framework handles phase failures and retries, then synthesize a strategy for Wazir."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2643,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2643,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERBuof98Ean5TWU7QGM","type":"assistant","uuid":"aa44dee8-f2f4-4cd7-9fb4-fe6d928881bd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:37.846Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"aa44dee8-f2f4-4cd7-9fb4-fe6d928881bd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012KJHtAtUNdXfVZXgYJdHM8","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_016GVTKuc1Y4dMv95hNwhrcP","name":"ToolSearch","input":{"query":"WebSearch","max_results":1},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2643,"cache_read_input_tokens":7745,"output_tokens":99,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2643},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERBuof98Ean5TWU7QGM","type":"assistant","uuid":"ee23caf6-e66e-4ea6-ba07-404cd89ddad5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:37.995Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ee23caf6-e66e-4ea6-ba07-404cd89ddad5","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"type":"tool_result","tool_use_id":"toolu_016GVTKuc1Y4dMv95hNwhrcP","content":[{"type":"tool_reference","tool_name":"WebSearch"}]}]},"uuid":"0dcefd90-fb38-4e10-8d3e-213c01ee4199","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:37.998Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"ee23caf6-e66e-4ea6-ba07-404cd89ddad5","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0dcefd90-fb38-4e10-8d3e-213c01ee4199","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01X4PFnuVjSxjabJkNAKPuuh","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me run all four research searches in parallel."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":629,"cache_read_input_tokens":10388,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":629,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERCGKhKNJzj2XZ1oyC1","type":"assistant","uuid":"f90e2ee7-2ca0-4925-baff-a1d4b298b87c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:42.611Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f90e2ee7-2ca0-4925-baff-a1d4b298b87c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01X4PFnuVjSxjabJkNAKPuuh","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01A7gm8T7BM3GUJzDPn1dZzw","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries what happens after max retries exception handling 2025 2026"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":629,"cache_read_input_tokens":10388,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":629,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERCGKhKNJzj2XZ1oyC1","type":"assistant","uuid":"d4e2e322-85a3-4b64-935d-d5678dd3363a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:43.130Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d4e2e322-85a3-4b64-935d-d5678dd3363a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01X4PFnuVjSxjabJkNAKPuuh","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_0128kWuQP2PSH6PrCVBtgggL","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"LangGraph error handling node failure retry mechanism 2025 2026"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":629,"cache_read_input_tokens":10388,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":629,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERCGKhKNJzj2XZ1oyC1","type":"assistant","uuid":"f22e820c-7209-4e2d-b5f5-1894db6e5e7c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:43.605Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f22e820c-7209-4e2d-b5f5-1894db6e5e7c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01X4PFnuVjSxjabJkNAKPuuh","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_012N1B3Rip4ryTwh1GVPrmdZ","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Temporal.io retry policy exponential backoff max attempts non-retryable errors workflow"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":629,"cache_read_input_tokens":10388,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":629,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERCGKhKNJzj2XZ1oyC1","type":"assistant","uuid":"33bdb597-4cae-432b-9c49-7a7a9aecb7bc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:44.022Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"33bdb597-4cae-432b-9c49-7a7a9aecb7bc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01X4PFnuVjSxjabJkNAKPuuh","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01WV19ceoh48rqLx2tLqKSX7","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Symphony AI framework RetryQueued state max dispatch attempts retry mechanism"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":629,"cache_read_input_tokens":10388,"output_tokens":238,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":629},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERCGKhKNJzj2XZ1oyC1","type":"assistant","uuid":"6a35c4cf-92ad-41f7-8e65-01543b2c6624","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:44.322Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6a35c4cf-92ad-41f7-8e65-01543b2c6624","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries exception handling"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A7gm8T7BM3GUJzDPn1dZzw","uuid":"de5d24d6-2b61-404d-895b-b8c81b43b1b1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:45.604Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"de5d24d6-2b61-404d-895b-b8c81b43b1b1","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"LangGraph error handling node failure retry mechanism 2025 2026"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_0128kWuQP2PSH6PrCVBtgggL","uuid":"d578c4a4-1a1d-4541-85fc-9cc3a1906cad","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:47.192Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d578c4a4-1a1d-4541-85fc-9cc3a1906cad","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Temporal.io retry policy exponential backoff max attempts non-retryable errors workflow"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_012N1B3Rip4ryTwh1GVPrmdZ","uuid":"d38e0def-c467-4629-96c1-a03a2ec78a1c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:47.348Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d38e0def-c467-4629-96c1-a03a2ec78a1c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Symphony AI framework RetryQueued state max dispatch attempts retry mechanism"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WV19ceoh48rqLx2tLqKSX7","uuid":"83f2049d-f0a4-4615-b82d-440f8241cd02","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:47.591Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"83f2049d-f0a4-4615-b82d-440f8241cd02","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries exception handling"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_016MW9g65LvRhB75znSsXbYj","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01A7gm8T7BM3GUJzDPn1dZzw","uuid":"d6644b90-669f-4c0e-b574-b50934cfed1f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:48.222Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d6644b90-669f-4c0e-b574-b50934cfed1f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"LangGraph error handling node failure retry mechanism 2025 2026"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01PuZwCxVXyByJFEcF5bHfJ4","parentToolUseID":"toolu_0128kWuQP2PSH6PrCVBtgggL","uuid":"0721b4a0-4d79-484a-a1cd-25674ab247f1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:48.497Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0721b4a0-4d79-484a-a1cd-25674ab247f1","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Temporal.io retry policy exponential backoff max attempts non-retryable errors workflow"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_015psWDNGAnVZ3LHSfQbpRGd","parentToolUseID":"toolu_012N1B3Rip4ryTwh1GVPrmdZ","uuid":"b3a412d6-2f05-4245-865e-80db91fd9825","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:48.655Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b3a412d6-2f05-4245-865e-80db91fd9825","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Symphony AI framework RetryQueued state max dispatch attempts retry mechanism"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_012JuNPD64CMGycsUHpswkt3","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01WV19ceoh48rqLx2tLqKSX7","uuid":"18da7402-5a16-4e80-88c1-884e01c6f067","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:49.136Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d4e2e322-85a3-4b64-935d-d5678dd3363a","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01A7gm8T7BM3GUJzDPn1dZzw","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries what happens after max retries exception handling 2025 2026\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Tasks - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.crewai.com/en/concepts/tasks\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail: Implementing quality standards with function-based CrewAI Guardrails · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail\"},{\"title\":\"CrewAI Guardrails: A Guide to Reliable Multi-Agent Workflows %\",\"url\":\"https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/11/introduction-to-task-guardrails-in-crewai/\"},{\"title\":\"How to Implement Guardrails for Your AI Agents with CrewAI | Towards Data Science\",\"url\":\"https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-implement-guardrails-for-your-ai-agents-with-crewai-80b8cb55fa43/\"},{\"title\":\"Limit Agent retries - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/limit-agent-retries/1657\"},{\"title\":\"Adding guardrail to a task error (crew defined with decorators) - General - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/adding-guardrail-to-a-task-error-crew-defined-with-decorators/2814\"},{\"title\":\"crewAI-quickstarts/Guardrails/task_guardrails.ipynb at main · crewAIInc/crewAI-quickstarts\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-quickstarts/blob/main/Guardrails/task_guardrails.ipynb\"},{\"title\":\"SSL certificate verify failed - General - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/ssl-certificate-verify-failed/4491\"},{\"title\":\"How to ensure crewAI agent tries only once - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/how-to-ensure-crewai-agent-tries-only-once/3334\"},{\"title\":\"Stop Your AI Agents From Going Rogue: A Practical Guide to CrewAI Guardrails | by Chetana Didugu | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://cervio.medium.com/stop-your-ai-agents-from-going-rogue-a-practical-guide-to-crewai-guardrails-a325fb5e9eca\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, I can provide you with information about what happens after `guardrail_max_retries` is exceeded in CrewAI:\n\n## What Happens After Max Retries\n\nWhen a guardrail returns (False, error), the error is sent back to the agent, the agent attempts to fix the issue, and the process repeats until either the guardrail returns (True, result) or maximum retries are reached (guardrail_max_retries).\n\nWhen the maximum number of retries is reached without the guardrail passing:\n\n\"not_feasible\" occurs when the maximum number of regeneration attempts is reached, and the application cannot produce output meeting the guardrail requirements. The guardrail_max_retries parameter gives the agent chances to get it right before the system actually raises an error.\n\n## Exception Handling Flow\n\nIf the result of the output fails to pass the guardrail check, the guardrail attempts to trigger a retry or generates an error. If an agent's output fails a guardrail, the system catches it, generates an error message, and sends it back to the agent saying \"You failed this specific rule. Try again.\"\n\nThe behavior ensures that the system remains stable and provides greater accuracy for overall more reliable workflow.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"9e21f3e8-105e-4078-b181-f9ab36a5101c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:51.733Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"d4e2e322-85a3-4b64-935d-d5678dd3363a","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"33bdb597-4cae-432b-9c49-7a7a9aecb7bc","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_012N1B3Rip4ryTwh1GVPrmdZ","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Temporal.io retry policy exponential backoff max attempts non-retryable errors workflow\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"What is a Temporal Retry Policy? | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/encyclopedia/retry-policies\"},{\"title\":\"Retry logic in Workflows: Best practices for failure handling | Temporal\",\"url\":\"https://temporal.io/blog/failure-handling-in-practice\"},{\"title\":\"Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://php.temporal.io/classes/Temporal-Common-RetryOptions.html\"},{\"title\":\"Understanding workflow retries and failures - Community Support - Temporal Community Forum\",\"url\":\"https://community.temporal.io/t/understanding-workflow-retries-and-failures/122\"},{\"title\":\"Retry Policy from HTTP Responses | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/ai-cookbook/http-retry-enhancement-python\"},{\"title\":\"Class: RetryPolicy | Temporal TypeScript SDK API Reference\",\"url\":\"https://typescript.temporal.io/api/classes/proto.temporal.api.common.v1.RetryPolicy\"},{\"title\":\"Different retry algorithm for activities - Community Support - Temporal Community Forum\",\"url\":\"https://community.temporal.io/t/different-retry-algorithm-for-activities/3765\"},{\"title\":\"Error Retries in Temporal Workflow - Mincong Huang\",\"url\":\"https://mincong.io/en/error-retries-in-temporal/\"},{\"title\":\"Failure detection - Python SDK | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/develop/python/failure-detection\"},{\"title\":\"Allowing workflow to specify max retry attempts / duration before an activity starts throwing non-BENIGN errors · Issue #8611 · temporalio/temporal\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/temporalio/temporal/issues/8611\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's comprehensive information about Temporal.io retry policies:\n\n## Default Behavior\n\nTemporal's default behavior is to automatically retry an Activity, with a short delay between each attempt that increases exponentially, until it either succeeds or is canceled.\n\n## Key Retry Policy Components\n\n**Exponential Backoff:**\nThe default Retry Policy uses exponential backoff with a 2.0 backoff coefficient, starting with a 1-second initial interval and capping at a maximum interval of 100 seconds.\n\n**Maximum Attempts:**\nMaximum attempts specifies the maximum number of execution attempts that can be made in the presence of failures. The default is unlimited. If this limit is exceeded, the execution fails without retrying again.\n\n**Non-Retryable Errors:**\nNon-Retryable Errors specify errors that shouldn't be retried. If the Activity cannot proceed with the input it has, that error should be surfaced immediately so that the input can be corrected on the next attempt.\n\n## Retry Interval Calculation\n\nA retry interval is the smaller of two values: The Initial Interval multiplied by the Backoff Coefficient raised to the power of the number of retries, or the Maximum Interval.\n\n## Default Values\n\nBy default, the maximum attempt of retries are set to zero which is evaluated as unlimited and non-retryable errors default to none.\n\n## Workflow vs Activity Retries\n\nBy default, Temporal retries activities, but not workflows.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"4395286c-ccb9-4e7d-b17d-9f1c93c41eff","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:53.216Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"33bdb597-4cae-432b-9c49-7a7a9aecb7bc","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6a35c4cf-92ad-41f7-8e65-01543b2c6624","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01WV19ceoh48rqLx2tLqKSX7","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Symphony AI framework RetryQueued state max dispatch attempts retry mechanism\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"symphony/SPEC.md at main · openai/symphony\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony/blob/main/SPEC.md\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: From Issue Ticket to Pull Request Without a Developer\",\"url\":\"https://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-03-05-openai-symphony-autonomous-coding/\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: When AI Agents Run Your Sprint Board\",\"url\":\"https://sjramblings.io/openai-symphony-autonomous-agent-orchestration/\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: Code Orchestration Framework\",\"url\":\"https://www.digitalapplied.com/blog/openai-symphony-autonomous-code-orchestration-framework\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - openai/symphony: Symphony turns project work into isolated, autonomous implementation runs, allowing teams to manage work instead of supervising coding agents. · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"Retry Mechanisms | Glossary by DATAFOREST\",\"url\":\"https://dataforest.ai/glossary/retry-mechanisms\"},{\"title\":\"Retry\",\"url\":\"https://resilience4j.readme.io/docs/retry\"},{\"title\":\"A retry mechanism for Symfony commands | by Smaine Milianni | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://smaine-milianni.medium.com/a-retry-mechanism-for-symfony-commands-15d48f9d4657\"},{\"title\":\"Error Handling - Restate\",\"url\":\"https://docs.restate.dev/guides/error-handling\"},{\"title\":\"Retry resilience strategy | Polly\",\"url\":\"https://www.pollydocs.org/strategies/retry.html\"}]\n\nBased on the web search results, here's information about the Symphony AI framework's RetryQueued state, max dispatch attempts, and retry mechanism:\n\n## RetryQueued State\n\nIn practice, claimed issues in Symphony are either Running or RetryQueued. The RetryQueued state is part of Symphony's orchestration workflow, representing issues that have failed and are waiting to be retried.\n\n## Issue States and Flow\n\nThe state flow includes Unclaimed → Claimed → Running, with RetryQueued as an intermediate state before terminal states like Succeeded, Failed, TimedOut, Stalled, or Released.\n\n## Retry Mechanism with Exponential Backoff\n\nSymphony uses exponential backoff with the formula: delay = min(10000 × 2^(attempt-1), max_backoff_ms) with the default max_backoff_ms of 300,000 (5 minutes).\n\nThe retry mechanism uses exponential backoff with a configurable cap, with a base delay of 10 seconds and the formula: min(10s × 2^attempts, 300s), producing the sequence: 10s → 20s → 40s → 80s.\n\n## Maximum Retries and Graceful Degradation\n\nWhen max retries are exceeded, tasks are released back for human attention. The claim is removed because the issue is terminal, non-active, missing, or the retry path completed without re-dispatch.\n\nThis design ensures that Symphony handles transient failures gracefully while preventing infinite retry loops and unnecessary resource consumption.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"13548b56-9552-4914-a0e0-d78abed109b0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:53.966Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6a35c4cf-92ad-41f7-8e65-01543b2c6624","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"f22e820c-7209-4e2d-b5f5-1894db6e5e7c","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_0128kWuQP2PSH6PrCVBtgggL","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"LangGraph error handling node failure retry mechanism 2025 2026\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"A Beginner’s Guide to Handling Errors in LangGraph with Retry Policies - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/aiengineering/a-beginners-guide-to-handling-errors-in-langgraph-with-retry-policies-h22\"},{\"title\":\"LangGraph Error Handling: Retries & Fallback Strategies - machinelearningplus\",\"url\":\"https://machinelearningplus.com/gen-ai/langgraph-error-handling-retries-fallback-strategies/\"},{\"title\":\"Advanced Error Handling Strategies in LangGraph ...\",\"url\":\"https://sparkco.ai/blog/advanced-error-handling-strategies-in-langgraph-applications\"},{\"title\":\"Error Handling Fundas — Langgraph/LangChain | by Rangesh Sripathi | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://rangesh.medium.com/error-handling-fundas-langgraph-langchain-fd48e959a8ca\"},{\"title\":\"The best way in LangGraph to control flow after retries exhausted - LangGraph - LangChain Forum\",\"url\":\"https://forum.langchain.com/t/the-best-way-in-langgraph-to-control-flow-after-retries-exhausted/1574\"},{\"title\":\"Node Retry Policies are not respected when a node fails with Pydantic ValidationError · Issue #6027 · langchain-ai/langgraph\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/issues/6027\"},{\"title\":\"Tool Call Validation and Error Handling | jun-sajima/langgraph-study | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/jun-sajima/langgraph-study/8.3-tool-call-validation-and-error-handling\"},{\"title\":\"Mastering Retry Logic Agents: A Deep Dive into 2025 Best ...\",\"url\":\"https://sparkco.ai/blog/mastering-retry-logic-agents-a-deep-dive-into-2025-best-practices\"},{\"title\":\"LangChain Error Handling Best Practices: Retry Logic and Fallback Strategies | LangChain Tutorials\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-tutorials.github.io/langchain-error-handling-retry-logic-fallback-strategies/\"},{\"title\":\"LangGraph Best Practices - Swarnendu De\",\"url\":\"https://www.swarnendu.de/blog/langgraph-best-practices/\"}]\n\nI've completed the web search for \"LangGraph error handling node failure retry mechanism 2025 2026\". Here's a summary of the findings:\n\n## Key Results:\n\n**Default Behavior:**\nBy default, when a node fails, the graph stops and the error surfaces immediately, as this behavior is intentional—LangGraph does not guess how you want failures handled and does not silently retry, skip steps, or recover on your behalf.\n\n**Retry Policies:**\nRetry policies exist because LangGraph assumes that some failures are temporary and recoverable. LangGraph provides a structured, graph-native way to retry failed operations intelligently—you decide how many times a node should retry, how long it should wait, and when it should finally give up.\n\n**Node-Specific Retries:**\nYou can apply node-specific retry policies by using the retry parameter when adding a node, with the ability to specify error types and maximum attempts.\n\n**Tool Error Handling:**\nLangGraph's ToolNode comes with error handling through the handle_tool_errors flag—when a tool throws, ToolNode catches it and sends the error back as a ToolMessage, allowing the LLM to see the error and fix its approach.\n\n**Multi-Level Error Handling (2025 Best Practices):**\nError handling is implemented at various layers including node, graph, and application levels, with errors being surfaced as typed objects within the state for downstream processing.\n\n**Fallback Strategies:**\nImplementation of bounded retries and fallback mechanisms are discussed to manage persistent failures gracefully.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"7272adcf-918f-4b25-b1a2-39bc6089eb8b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:54.162Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"f22e820c-7209-4e2d-b5f5-1894db6e5e7c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"7272adcf-918f-4b25-b1a2-39bc6089eb8b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BRFwBMpcVRZnDy3RP2n9Hf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Let me dig deeper into the specifics for each framework."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1621,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2233,"cache_read_input_tokens":11017,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2233,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERDZKfqDHCnfPA6bHwe","type":"assistant","uuid":"fe993e3f-2f64-4d59-bbdd-5475562b43f7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:33:59.751Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fe993e3f-2f64-4d59-bbdd-5475562b43f7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BRFwBMpcVRZnDy3RP2n9Hf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_013g2kCkZtXdZKZNS7nWAva7","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries source code TaskOutput guardrail validation tuple return exception raised"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1621,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2233,"cache_read_input_tokens":11017,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2233,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERDZKfqDHCnfPA6bHwe","type":"assistant","uuid":"2b1f0f08-0f6d-4e21-816e-09c73c91b76d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:00.735Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2b1f0f08-0f6d-4e21-816e-09c73c91b76d","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BRFwBMpcVRZnDy3RP2n9Hf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01LkE7JNfSsWknCwNYr8gFrY","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"LangGraph RetryPolicy node retry_on interval_ms max_attempts backoff_factor exhausted fallback"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1621,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2233,"cache_read_input_tokens":11017,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2233,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERDZKfqDHCnfPA6bHwe","type":"assistant","uuid":"95a19cbb-e343-45c3-93e2-c6c9e3f46827","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:01.619Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"95a19cbb-e343-45c3-93e2-c6c9e3f46827","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries TaskOutput guardrail validation"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_013g2kCkZtXdZKZNS7nWAva7","uuid":"848432db-d489-41bd-85b2-582161cf0e9b","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:01.779Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"848432db-d489-41bd-85b2-582161cf0e9b","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BRFwBMpcVRZnDy3RP2n9Hf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_016gnABmka47x1n7QhsPRgYk","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"Temporal retry policy non_retryable_error_types ApplicationError maximum_interval backoff_coefficient activity failure"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1621,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2233,"cache_read_input_tokens":11017,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2233,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERDZKfqDHCnfPA6bHwe","type":"assistant","uuid":"4e248fc0-fd42-4b37-a8e6-8e14a5fa1ef5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:02.525Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4e248fc0-fd42-4b37-a8e6-8e14a5fa1ef5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01BRFwBMpcVRZnDy3RP2n9Hf","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_011EyGaTp3MJUVJs1oYA69ui","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"OpenAI Symphony SPEC.md RetryQueued max_dispatch_attempts issue states terminal failure"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1621,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2233,"cache_read_input_tokens":11017,"output_tokens":259,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2233},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERDZKfqDHCnfPA6bHwe","type":"assistant","uuid":"e40dcc95-dc60-4d6e-a82c-e14b2970c2d4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:03.057Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e40dcc95-dc60-4d6e-a82c-e14b2970c2d4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries TaskOutput guardrail validation"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_012cMwHsJbC3KzETJevfsYR9","parentToolUseID":"toolu_013g2kCkZtXdZKZNS7nWAva7","uuid":"97a598b9-8192-49b3-a37a-44299ded262a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:03.227Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"97a598b9-8192-49b3-a37a-44299ded262a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"Temporal retry policy non_retryable_error_types ApplicationError maximum_interval backoff_coefficient activity failure"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_016gnABmka47x1n7QhsPRgYk","uuid":"6cae3fef-b7f8-40fc-a868-613b03615c86","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:04.895Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6cae3fef-b7f8-40fc-a868-613b03615c86","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"OpenAI Symphony SPEC.md RetryQueued max_dispatch_attempts"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_011EyGaTp3MJUVJs1oYA69ui","uuid":"2b811f77-f432-4fd9-97f7-d58a89459b42","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:05.144Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2b811f77-f432-4fd9-97f7-d58a89459b42","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"OpenAI Symphony SPEC.md RetryQueued max_dispatch_attempts"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01Tac1itu49SFpabjcdMdqWo","parentToolUseID":"toolu_011EyGaTp3MJUVJs1oYA69ui","uuid":"ad88c51e-3d00-4fa9-8aed-6025e10ad5f2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:06.611Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ad88c51e-3d00-4fa9-8aed-6025e10ad5f2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"LangGraph RetryPolicy node retry_on interval_ms max_attempts backoff_factor exhausted fallback"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01LkE7JNfSsWknCwNYr8gFrY","uuid":"54885014-16d2-4463-bcb9-696497660163","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:06.875Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"54885014-16d2-4463-bcb9-696497660163","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"Temporal retry policy non_retryable_error_types ApplicationError maximum_interval backoff_coefficient activity failure"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01DgJhyxBQvBzR8pFYkL7kc1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_016gnABmka47x1n7QhsPRgYk","uuid":"12b9de54-9675-4321-a87a-56637e0836e7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:06.973Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2b1f0f08-0f6d-4e21-816e-09c73c91b76d","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_013g2kCkZtXdZKZNS7nWAva7","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries source code TaskOutput guardrail validation tuple return exception raised\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Tasks - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.crewai.com/en/concepts/tasks\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail: Implementing quality standards with function-based CrewAI Guardrails · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail\"},{\"title\":\"CrewAI Guardrails: A Guide to Reliable Multi-Agent Workflows %\",\"url\":\"https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/11/introduction-to-task-guardrails-in-crewai/\"},{\"title\":\"[FEATURE]More comfortable guardrail validation · Issue #2177 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/2177\"},{\"title\":\"crewAI-quickstarts/Guardrails/task_guardrails.ipynb at main · crewAIInc/crewAI-quickstarts\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-quickstarts/blob/main/Guardrails/task_guardrails.ipynb\"},{\"title\":\"Adding guardrail to a task error (crew defined with decorators) - General - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/adding-guardrail-to-a-task-error-crew-defined-with-decorators/2814\"},{\"title\":\"feat: Add task guardrails feature by devin-ai-integration[bot] · Pull Request #1742 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/pull/1742\"},{\"title\":\"How to Implement Guardrails for Your AI Agents with CrewAI | Towards Data Science\",\"url\":\"https://towardsdatascience.com/how-to-implement-guardrails-for-your-ai-agents-with-crewai-80b8cb55fa43/\"},{\"title\":\"Stop Your AI Agents From Going Rogue: A Practical Guide to CrewAI Guardrails | by Chetana Didugu | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://cervio.medium.com/stop-your-ai-agents-from-going-rogue-a-practical-guide-to-crewai-guardrails-a325fb5e9eca\"},{\"title\":\"Guardrail Timing issue - Code Review Assignment CIM2_Assignment.ipynb - Multi-Agent Systems with CrewAI - DeepLearning.AI\",\"url\":\"https://community.deeplearning.ai/t/guardrail-timing-issue-code-review-assignment-cim2-assignment-ipynb/885739\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's what I found about CrewAI guardrails, guardrail_max_retries, TaskOutput, and guardrail validation:\n\n## Guardrail Return Types\n\nOn success, guardrails return a tuple of (bool, Any), for example: (True, validated_result). On failure, they return a tuple of (bool, str), for example: (False, \"Error message explain the failure\").\n\n## TaskOutput Parameter\n\nThe TaskOutput object contains the output data of a completed Task and gets passed to the CrewAI Guardrail function, which validates the output. Guardrail functions receive a TaskOutput as parameter in their function signature, for example: `def validate_with_context(result: TaskOutput) -> Tuple[bool, Any]`.\n\n## guardrail_max_retries\n\nIf any guardrail fails, the error is sent back to the agent, and the task is retried up to guardrail_max_retries times. If the result fails the guardrail check, the guardrail attempts to trigger a retry or generates an error, and you can customize retries by defining the maximum retries, retry intervals, and custom messages.\n\n## Tuple Return Structure\n\nThe key rule is that your function must return (True, result) if it passes, or (False, \"Error Message\") if it fails.\n\nThe search results don't contain specific information about source code implementation details regarding exception raising or specific internal validation logic, but they confirm the tuple return structure and TaskOutput parameter usage are the standard patterns for guardrail functions in CrewAI.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"b5a3b9fb-1554-43e5-9c67-3d10f6530283","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:07.789Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"2b1f0f08-0f6d-4e21-816e-09c73c91b76d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b5a3b9fb-1554-43e5-9c67-3d10f6530283","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"LangGraph RetryPolicy node retry_on interval_ms max_attempts backoff_factor exhausted fallback"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_012e1YmqMrugp57JDCSzcobv","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01LkE7JNfSsWknCwNYr8gFrY","uuid":"da914ffb-25af-4d0f-b610-e5e1150ba6d0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:08.317Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e40dcc95-dc60-4d6e-a82c-e14b2970c2d4","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_011EyGaTp3MJUVJs1oYA69ui","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"OpenAI Symphony SPEC.md RetryQueued max_dispatch_attempts issue states terminal failure\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"symphony/SPEC.md at main · openai/symphony\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony/blob/main/SPEC.md\"},{\"title\":\"Symphony SPEC.md 全セクションざっくり日本語解説 — OpenAIから学ぶマルチエージェント開発設計\",\"url\":\"https://zenn.dev/komlock_lab/articles/openai-symphony-spec-guide\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: From Issue Ticket to Pull Request Without a Developer\",\"url\":\"https://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-03-05-openai-symphony-autonomous-coding/\"},{\"title\":\"Poll-Dispatch-Resolve-Land Workflow (inspired by OpenAI ...\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/404\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - openai/symphony: Symphony turns project work into isolated, autonomous implementation runs, allowing teams to manage work instead of supervising coding agents. · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: When AI Agents Run Your Sprint Board\",\"url\":\"https://sjramblings.io/openai-symphony-autonomous-agent-orchestration/\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony — AI Skill — Termo\",\"url\":\"https://termo.ai/skills/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"openai/symphony | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/openai/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony | Hacker News\",\"url\":\"https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252045\"},{\"title\":\"symphony/README.md at main · openai/symphony\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony/blob/main/README.md\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, I found relevant information about OpenAI Symphony's SPEC.md and the RetryQueued state. Here's what the documentation shows:\n\n## RetryQueued State\n\nIn Symphony, claimed issues are either Running or RetryQueued. The RetryQueued state occurs when a worker is not running, but a retry timer exists in retry_attempts.\n\n## Terminal States and max_dispatch_attempts\n\nWhen an agent fails, Symphony uses exponential backoff with the formula: delay = min(10000 × 2^(attempt-1), max_backoff_ms). With the default max_backoff_ms of 300,000 (5 minutes), after exhausting all retries, the issue is Released back to the tracker.\n\nFrom the state diagram in the SPEC, terminal states include Succeeded, Failed, TimedOut, Stalled, and CanceledByReconciliation.\n\n## Key Concept\n\nDistinct terminal reasons are important because retry logic and logs differ. This indicates that Symphony differentiates between various failure modes to handle retries appropriately based on the specific terminal failure reason.\n\nThe search results show that Symphony's RetryQueued state is part of the issue lifecycle, and issues eventually transition to Released (terminal state) after exhausting retry attempts according to the configured backoff policy.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"3f22d94b-1d4e-4034-9523-c076dba04e12","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:10.725Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"e40dcc95-dc60-4d6e-a82c-e14b2970c2d4","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"95a19cbb-e343-45c3-93e2-c6c9e3f46827","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01LkE7JNfSsWknCwNYr8gFrY","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"LangGraph RetryPolicy node retry_on interval_ms max_attempts backoff_factor exhausted fallback\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"The best way in LangGraph to control flow after retries exhausted - LangGraph - LangChain Forum\",\"url\":\"https://forum.langchain.com/t/the-best-way-in-langgraph-to-control-flow-after-retries-exhausted/1574\"},{\"title\":\"A Beginner’s Guide to Handling Errors in LangGraph with Retry Policies - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/aiengineering/a-beginners-guide-to-handling-errors-in-langgraph-with-retry-policies-h22\"},{\"title\":\"RetryPolicy | langgraph | LangChain Reference\",\"url\":\"https://reference.langchain.com/python/langgraph/types/RetryPolicy\"},{\"title\":\"Node Retry Policies are not respected when a node fails with Pydantic ValidationError · Issue #6027 · langchain-ai/langgraph\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/issues/6027\"},{\"title\":\"RetryPolicy | LangGraph.js API Reference\",\"url\":\"https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraphjs/reference/types/langgraph.RetryPolicy.html\"},{\"title\":\"RetryPolicy | langchain.js\",\"url\":\"https://reference.langchain.com/javascript/types/_langchain_langgraph.index.RetryPolicy.html\"},{\"title\":\"LangGraph Error Handling: Retries & Fallback Strategies - machinelearningplus\",\"url\":\"https://machinelearningplus.com/gen-ai/langgraph-error-handling-retries-fallback-strategies/\"},{\"title\":\"⚓ Enhanced state management & retries in LangGraph Python\",\"url\":\"https://changelog.langchain.com/announcements/enhanced-state-management-retries-in-langgraph-python\"},{\"title\":\"4 Fault Tolerance Patterns Every AI Agent Needs in Production - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/klement_gunndu/4-fault-tolerance-patterns-every-ai-agent-needs-in-production-jih\"},{\"title\":\"Error Handling Fundas — Langgraph/LangChain | by Rangesh Sripathi | Medium\",\"url\":\"https://rangesh.medium.com/error-handling-fundas-langgraph-langchain-fd48e959a8ca\"}]\n\nI found comprehensive information about LangGraph's RetryPolicy configuration. Here's what the search results show:\n\n## RetryPolicy Parameters\n\nLangGraph's RetryPolicy includes attributes for `backoff_factor` (multiplier by which the interval increases after each retry), `max_attempts` (maximum number of attempts to make before giving up, including the first), and `jitter` (whether to add random jitter to the interval between retries).\n\nAdditionally, `max_interval` specifies the maximum amount of time that may elapse between retries in seconds, and `retry_on` is a type or callable that specifies exception types to retry on.\n\n## Node Retry Configuration\n\nRetry policies can be applied to nodes in LangGraph using `builder.add_node(\"node_name\", node_function, retry_policy=RetryPolicy())`.\n\n## Handling Exhausted Retries\n\nWhen a node exceeds its retry policy, LangGraph stops retrying and treats the failure as final. If there is no alternate path, execution halts and the error is surfaced clearly. If your graph includes fallback nodes, conditional routing, or recovery logic, execution continues.\n\nFor fallback handling when retries are exhausted, you can add a conditional edge to a fallback node.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"db074616-94ce-4d83-a307-375a48f77fc8","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:12.108Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"95a19cbb-e343-45c3-93e2-c6c9e3f46827","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4e248fc0-fd42-4b37-a8e6-8e14a5fa1ef5","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_016gnABmka47x1n7QhsPRgYk","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"Temporal retry policy non_retryable_error_types ApplicationError maximum_interval backoff_coefficient activity failure\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"What is a Temporal Retry Policy? | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/encyclopedia/retry-policies\"},{\"title\":\"Error Retries in Temporal Workflow - Mincong Huang\",\"url\":\"https://mincong.io/en/error-retries-in-temporal/\"},{\"title\":\"Retry logic in Workflows: Best practices for failure handling | Temporal\",\"url\":\"https://temporal.io/blog/failure-handling-in-practice\"},{\"title\":\"Failure detection - Python SDK | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/develop/python/failure-detection\"},{\"title\":\"Understanding workflow retries and failures - Community Support - Temporal Community Forum\",\"url\":\"https://community.temporal.io/t/understanding-workflow-retries-and-failures/122\"},{\"title\":\"Error handling - Python SDK | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/develop/python/error-handling\"},{\"title\":\"edu-errstrat-go-code/exercises/non-retryable-error-types/README.md at main · temporalio/edu-errstrat-go-code\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/temporalio/edu-errstrat-go-code/blob/main/exercises/non-retryable-error-types/README.md\"},{\"title\":\"Is retry policy applicable to platform (temporal) error? - Community Support - Temporal\",\"url\":\"https://community.temporal.io/t/is-retry-policy-applicable-to-platform-temporal-error/18482\"},{\"title\":\"Failure detection - Go SDK | Temporal Platform Documentation\",\"url\":\"https://docs.temporal.io/develop/go/failure-detection\"},{\"title\":\"Workflow Retry policy seems to not be getting respected - Community Support - Temporal Community Forum\",\"url\":\"https://community.temporal.io/t/workflow-retry-policy-seems-to-not-be-getting-respected/11203\"}]\n\nI found comprehensive information about Temporal retry policies with the parameters you specified. Here's what the search results reveal:\n\n## Retry Policy Components\n\nThe default Retry Policy settings are: Initial Interval = 1 second, Backoff Coefficient = 2.0, Maximum Interval = 100 × Initial Interval, Maximum Attempts = ∞, and Non-Retryable Errors = []\n\n### Key Parameters\n\n**Backoff Coefficient**: The value dictates how much the retry interval increases, with a default value of 2.0. A backoff coefficient of 1.0 means the retry interval always equals the Initial Interval, while having a coefficient greater than 1.0 means the first few retries happen relatively quickly to overcome intermittent failures, but subsequent retries happen farther apart to account for longer outages.\n\n**Maximum Interval**: This attribute is useful for Backoff Coefficients that are greater than 1.0 because it prevents the retry interval from growing infinitely.\n\n### Non-Retryable Error Types\n\nNon-Retryable Errors specify errors that shouldn't be retried, and only the implementer can decide whether an error should never be retryable out of the box.\n\nWhen an Activity raises an ApplicationError, Temporal checks if its type is in non_retryable_error_types, and if it matches, the Activity fails immediately without retries.\n\n### Activity Failure Handling\n\nIf the activity returns an error as errors.New() or fmt.Errorf(), that error will be converted to *temporal.ApplicationError, which is retryable. If you don't want the error to be retried, you can return a non-retryable application error from the activity.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"bcebcd24-8efd-47f8-8699-e468eae97b9f","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:12.218Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"4e248fc0-fd42-4b37-a8e6-8e14a5fa1ef5","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"bcebcd24-8efd-47f8-8699-e468eae97b9f","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01AKchryp2q2Zm5N9vc29QEV","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Let me get the actual Symphony SPEC.md for precise details, and also look deeper at the CrewAI and LangGraph specifics."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":796,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4834,"cache_read_input_tokens":13250,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4834,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERFMYoT1Vrr65c4qEtb","type":"assistant","uuid":"b80d36b1-b187-4b8e-bbce-0bc23c70b545","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:24.954Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b80d36b1-b187-4b8e-bbce-0bc23c70b545","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01AKchryp2q2Zm5N9vc29QEV","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01BdErSEJVXFWuD9e5Z3mVHV","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"site:github.com openai/symphony SPEC.md \"max_dispatch_attempts\" \"RetryQueued\" retry_attempts state machine"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":796,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4834,"cache_read_input_tokens":13250,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4834,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERFMYoT1Vrr65c4qEtb","type":"assistant","uuid":"0d625290-909e-4c79-821a-3ad714fe6a4e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:25.970Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0d625290-909e-4c79-821a-3ad714fe6a4e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01AKchryp2q2Zm5N9vc29QEV","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"CrewAI task guardrail max retries exceeded raises exception or returns None behavior after failure"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":796,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4834,"cache_read_input_tokens":13250,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4834,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERFMYoT1Vrr65c4qEtb","type":"assistant","uuid":"b0f3bcfe-6c12-40af-92ab-2c21bd3ea7e6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:26.743Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b0f3bcfe-6c12-40af-92ab-2c21bd3ea7e6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01AKchryp2q2Zm5N9vc29QEV","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01Pn1x2Rj8F1MjHzxLTyRFHB","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"LangGraph conditional edge fallback node after retry exhausted model escalation pattern production"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":796,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4834,"cache_read_input_tokens":13250,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4834,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":3,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERFMYoT1Vrr65c4qEtb","type":"assistant","uuid":"8d898220-a0ae-49bd-9ffc-6dcb8ba3a5d0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:27.645Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8d898220-a0ae-49bd-9ffc-6dcb8ba3a5d0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"openai/symphony SPEC.md max_dispatch_attempts RetryQueued"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01BdErSEJVXFWuD9e5Z3mVHV","uuid":"91e05b36-a268-4c0f-beb1-55f87737c682","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:27.975Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"91e05b36-a268-4c0f-beb1-55f87737c682","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01AKchryp2q2Zm5N9vc29QEV","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01UT5tFMBCJS3TZnccsFjduS","name":"WebSearch","input":{"query":"AI agent retry strategy model escalation sonnet to opus fallback pattern multi-model retry"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":796,"cache_creation_input_tokens":4834,"cache_read_input_tokens":13250,"output_tokens":271,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":4834},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERFMYoT1Vrr65c4qEtb","type":"assistant","uuid":"39a7bc92-5b7d-4d5c-b07c-1d8c3fe4eaf6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:28.224Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"39a7bc92-5b7d-4d5c-b07c-1d8c3fe4eaf6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"openai/symphony SPEC.md max_dispatch_attempts RetryQueued"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_0191gRbkBwqNn4EdwC3NRaCK","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01BdErSEJVXFWuD9e5Z3mVHV","uuid":"2a1e0bb3-f342-415c-9415-d3ac0a10456a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:29.770Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2a1e0bb3-f342-415c-9415-d3ac0a10456a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CrewAI task guardrail max retries exceeded exception None behavior"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","uuid":"d6c88347-76a7-42bf-9291-9fca4b19736a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:30.452Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d6c88347-76a7-42bf-9291-9fca4b19736a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CrewAI task guardrail max retries exceeded exception None behavior"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01LfaM2sMGjYMBL2ptqKkX17","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","uuid":"d83a6eef-6dfe-49eb-bbc9-23a5edd1cd57","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:31.566Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d83a6eef-6dfe-49eb-bbc9-23a5edd1cd57","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries exceeded behavior what happens"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-3","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","uuid":"666e37ec-a318-421b-bb2b-eddf2bc11cc0","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:32.158Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"666e37ec-a318-421b-bb2b-eddf2bc11cc0","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"LangGraph conditional edge fallback node retry exhausted model escalation pattern"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Pn1x2Rj8F1MjHzxLTyRFHB","uuid":"4f8172c5-4b4e-4401-86db-051d3e16f25c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:32.170Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4f8172c5-4b4e-4401-86db-051d3e16f25c","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CrewAI guardrail_max_retries exceeded behavior what happens"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01GqJiNcUphyhqhgzZEzpwsA","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","uuid":"389c7453-2fea-40eb-8577-3646e120f5ed","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:33.292Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0d625290-909e-4c79-821a-3ad714fe6a4e","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01BdErSEJVXFWuD9e5Z3mVHV","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"site:github.com openai/symphony SPEC.md \"max_dispatch_attempts\" \"RetryQueued\" retry_attempts state machine\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"symphony/SPEC.md at main · openai/symphony\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony/blob/main/SPEC.md\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - openai/symphony: Symphony turns project work into isolated, autonomous implementation runs, allowing teams to manage work instead of supervising coding agents. · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: From Issue Ticket to Pull Request Without a Developer\",\"url\":\"https://www.heyuan110.com/posts/ai/2026-03-05-openai-symphony-autonomous-coding/\"},{\"title\":\"Poll-Dispatch-Resolve-Land Workflow (inspired by OpenAI ...\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/404\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony: When AI Agents Run Your Sprint Board\",\"url\":\"https://sjramblings.io/openai-symphony-autonomous-agent-orchestration/\"},{\"title\":\"openai/symphony | DeepWiki\",\"url\":\"https://deepwiki.com/openai/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony — AI Skill — Termo\",\"url\":\"https://termo.ai/skills/symphony\"},{\"title\":\"OpenAI Symphony | Hacker News\",\"url\":\"https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47252045\"},{\"title\":\"symphony/elixir/README.md at main · openai/symphony\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony/blob/main/elixir/README.md\"},{\"title\":\":musical_score: · openai/symphony@fa75ec6\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/openai/symphony/commit/fa75ec68c23fbf773c43197da618f88684d8d3f6\"}]\n\nBased on the web search results, I found information from the OpenAI Symphony SPEC.md file on GitHub. Here's what the search revealed:\n\n## Key Findings\n\nIn practice, claimed issues are either Running or RetryQueued, where RetryQueued means the worker is not running, but a retry timer exists in retry_attempts.\n\nClaimed issues are either Running or RetryQueued, with RetryQueued indicating the worker is not running, but a retry timer exists in retry_attempts.\n\n### State Machine Context\n\nEach issue transitions through: Unclaimed → Claimed → Running → RetryQueued → Released.\n\n### Retry Mechanism\n\nThe search results also revealed details about the retry backoff system: Symphony uses exponential backoff with the formula: delay = min(10000 × 2^(attempt-1), max_backoff_ms) with the default max_backoff_ms of 300,000 (5 minutes).\n\n### Internal State Management\n\nThe Orchestrator holds authoritative runtime state including running, claimed, and retry_attempts; no persistent database is required.\n\nThe search results show that the SPEC.md file contains references to `max_dispatch_attempts`, `RetryQueued`, `retry_attempts`, and the state machine transitions, though the specific configuration parameter names and detailed state machine definitions appear in the SPEC.md file directly on GitHub.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"fc3a1fe6-6e5f-4aa8-98b0-3ef679a446c6","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:33.888Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"0d625290-909e-4c79-821a-3ad714fe6a4e","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fc3a1fe6-6e5f-4aa8-98b0-3ef679a446c6","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"CrewAI Task output guardrail fails all retries exhausted exception raised"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-5","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","uuid":"54668355-df54-4ead-b1eb-85c7229a00fd","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:33.907Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"54668355-df54-4ead-b1eb-85c7229a00fd","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"LangGraph conditional edge fallback node retry exhausted model escalation pattern"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_01RL7HBdXH3tCecduRtEFFSV","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Pn1x2Rj8F1MjHzxLTyRFHB","uuid":"36d6ef02-5efc-4bfc-aea6-d7cbd6cf2dfe","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:34.466Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"36d6ef02-5efc-4bfc-aea6-d7cbd6cf2dfe","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"CrewAI Task output guardrail fails all retries exhausted exception raised"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_0175jdPd2GvEVUmPcvRGu5hP","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","uuid":"4fa4b87b-4e6e-4093-817d-50267f5adbef","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:35.232Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4fa4b87b-4e6e-4093-817d-50267f5adbef","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"query_update","query":"AI agent retry strategy model escalation fallback pattern multi-model"},"toolUseID":"search-progress-1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UT5tFMBCJS3TZnccsFjduS","uuid":"55ab2fa7-5c19-421d-87c5-5f488dc1ea34","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:35.888Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"55ab2fa7-5c19-421d-87c5-5f488dc1ea34","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"search_results_received","resultCount":10,"query":"AI agent retry strategy model escalation fallback pattern multi-model"},"toolUseID":"srvtoolu_018KeEGwJKx86wrnEeGpt4Rc","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UT5tFMBCJS3TZnccsFjduS","uuid":"b00b267b-fea3-4ae4-a854-aff13e9f1b6c","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:37.139Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b0f3bcfe-6c12-40af-92ab-2c21bd3ea7e6","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Tt3fV8nkQ7pX2KNZQ2ntcW","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"CrewAI task guardrail max retries exceeded raises exception or returns None behavior after failure\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Tasks - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.crewai.com/en/concepts/tasks\"},{\"title\":\"Adding guardrail to a task error (crew defined with decorators) - General - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/adding-guardrail-to-a-task-error-crew-defined-with-decorators/2814\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail: Implementing quality standards with function-based CrewAI Guardrails · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail\"},{\"title\":\"[BUG] Request timed out us.i.posthog.com Max retries exceeded with url: /batch/ · Issue #1565 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/1565\"},{\"title\":\"Limit Agent retries - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/limit-agent-retries/1657\"},{\"title\":\"Getting timeout error when request takes longer than 5 minutes · Issue #173 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/joaomdmoura/crewAI/issues/173\"},{\"title\":\"SSL certificate verify failed - General - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/ssl-certificate-verify-failed/4491\"},{\"title\":\"Connection to telemetry.crewai.com timed out. · Issue #292 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/292\"},{\"title\":\"[BUG] RUN crewai create crew ... failed, is there a way to manually create a crew? · Issue #2820 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/2820\"},{\"title\":\"Limit Agent retries - #15 by RayMathew - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/limit-agent-retries/1657/15\"}]\n\nLet me search more specifically for information about what happens when guardrail max retries are exceeded:\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"CrewAI Guardrails: A Guide to Reliable Multi-Agent Workflows %\",\"url\":\"https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/11/introduction-to-task-guardrails-in-crewai/\"},{\"title\":\"Tasks - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.crewai.com/en/concepts/tasks\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail: Implementing quality standards with function-based CrewAI Guardrails · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail\"},{\"title\":\"Limit Agent retries - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/limit-agent-retries/1657\"},{\"title\":\"Getting timeout error when request takes longer than 5 minutes · Issue #173 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/joaomdmoura/crewAI/issues/173\"},{\"title\":\"[BUG] Request timed out us.i.posthog.com Max retries exceeded with url: /batch/ · Issue #1565 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/1565\"},{\"title\":\"[BUG] RUN crewai create crew ... failed, is there a way to manually create a crew? · Issue #2820 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/2820\"},{\"title\":\"Connection to telemetry.crewai.com timed out. · Issue #292 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/292\"},{\"title\":\"Crewai limit issue - Multi-Agent Systems with CrewAI - DeepLearning.AI\",\"url\":\"https://community.deeplearning.ai/t/crewai-limit-issue/885937\"},{\"title\":\"Limit Agent retries - #9 by m1k3y02 - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/limit-agent-retries/1657/9\"}]\n\nLet me search for more specific information about what happens when guardrails are exhausted:\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Tasks - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://docs.crewai.com/en/concepts/tasks\"},{\"title\":\"Adding guardrail to a task error (crew defined with decorators) - General - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/adding-guardrail-to-a-task-error-crew-defined-with-decorators/2814\"},{\"title\":\"Introduction to Task Guardrails in CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/11/introduction-to-task-guardrails-in-crewai/\"},{\"title\":\"Guardrail Timing issue - Code Review Assignment CIM2_Assignment.ipynb - Multi-Agent Systems with CrewAI - DeepLearning.AI\",\"url\":\"https://community.deeplearning.ai/t/guardrail-timing-issue-code-review-assignment-cim2-assignment-ipynb/885739\"},{\"title\":\"GitHub - botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail: Implementing quality standards with function-based CrewAI Guardrails · GitHub\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/botextractai/ai-crewai-task-guardrail\"},{\"title\":\"CrewAI Guardrails output issue - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/crewai-guardrails-output-issue/7310\"},{\"title\":\"Task fails to retain previous tasks’ output - CrewAI Community Support - CrewAI\",\"url\":\"https://community.crewai.com/t/task-fails-to-retain-previous-tasks-output/1535\"},{\"title\":\"[FEATURE]More comfortable guardrail validation · Issue #2177 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/2177\"},{\"title\":\"CrewAI Report Agent: LLMGuardrailResult JSON parse failure due to trailing characters · Issue #3191 · crewAIInc/crewAI\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/issues/3191\"},{\"title\":\"crewAI-quickstarts/Guardrails/task_guardrails.ipynb at main · crewAIInc/crewAI-quickstarts\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI-quickstarts/blob/main/Guardrails/task_guardrails.ipynb\"}]\n\nBased on my search results, here's what I found regarding the behavior of CrewAI task guardrails when `guardrail_max_retries` are exceeded:\n\n## Summary of Findings\n\nIf the result of the output fails to pass the guardrail check, the guardrail attempts to trigger a retry or generates an error. More specifically, the system iteratively retries until the output of the task meets the word count, or gives up when it reaches the max_retries number.\n\nIf the output does not conform to the guardrail rules, the system will stop execution or retry according to your configurations.\n\nThe available documentation indicates that CrewAI can automatically regenerate the output up to your set limit until it meets the rules or exhausts retries. However, the search results do not contain explicit documentation about whether an exception is raised or `None` is returned when max retries are exceeded.\n\n## What We Know\n\n- Use `guardrail_max_retries` instead to control retry attempts when a guardrail fails.\n- The retry mechanism attempts to have the agent regenerate output iteratively until either the guardrail passes or the maximum retry count is exhausted\n- When guardrails fail, the system can either stop execution or retry based on configuration\n\n**Note:** For the specific behavior (whether an exception is raised or `None` is returned after exhausting retries), I recommend checking the CrewAI source code or the official API documentation, as this specific implementation detail is not clearly documented in the publicly available sources.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"7ab2b3eb-0a1c-4d58-84d7-aadde8b328df","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:39.599Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"b0f3bcfe-6c12-40af-92ab-2c21bd3ea7e6","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8d898220-a0ae-49bd-9ffc-6dcb8ba3a5d0","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01Pn1x2Rj8F1MjHzxLTyRFHB","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"LangGraph conditional edge fallback node after retry exhausted model escalation pattern production\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"LangGraph Error Handling: Retries & Fallback Strategies - machinelearningplus\",\"url\":\"https://machinelearningplus.com/gen-ai/langgraph-error-handling-retries-fallback-strategies/\"},{\"title\":\"The best way in LangGraph to control flow after retries exhausted - LangGraph - LangChain Forum\",\"url\":\"https://forum.langchain.com/t/the-best-way-in-langgraph-to-control-flow-after-retries-exhausted/1574\"},{\"title\":\"A Beginner’s Guide to Handling Errors in LangGraph with Retry Policies - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/aiengineering/a-beginners-guide-to-handling-errors-in-langgraph-with-retry-policies-h22\"},{\"title\":\"LangGraph Best Practices - Swarnendu De\",\"url\":\"https://www.swarnendu.de/blog/langgraph-best-practices/\"},{\"title\":\"Node Retry Policies are not respected when a node fails with Pydantic ValidationError · Issue #6027 · langchain-ai/langgraph\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/issues/6027\"},{\"title\":\"Use the graph API - Docs by LangChain\",\"url\":\"https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langgraph/use-graph-api\"},{\"title\":\"Advanced LangGraph: Implementing Conditional Edges and Tool-Calling Agents - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/jamesli/advanced-langgraph-implementing-conditional-edges-and-tool-calling-agents-3pdn\"},{\"title\":\"Advanced Error Handling Strategies in LangGraph ...\",\"url\":\"https://sparkco.ai/blog/advanced-error-handling-strategies-in-langgraph-applications\"},{\"title\":\"LangGraph Tutorial: Implementing Advanced Conditional Routing - Unit 1.3 Exercise 4 - AIPE\",\"url\":\"https://aiproduct.engineer/tutorials/langgraph-tutorial-implementing-advanced-conditional-routing-unit-13-exercise-4\"},{\"title\":\"\\\"can receive only one value per step\\\" error when running retry in graph parallel processing · langchain-ai/langgraph · Discussion #2335\",\"url\":\"https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/discussions/2335\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, I found comprehensive information about the LangGraph pattern you're asking about. Here's what the search revealed:\n\n## LangGraph Conditional Edge Fallback Pattern After Retry Exhaustion\n\nA conditional edge checks the counter and either loops back (retry) or heads to a fallback (give up). This is a core pattern for handling exhausted retries in production systems.\n\n### Key Components:\n\n**1. Retry Tracking in State**\nAdd retry_count and max_retries to the state. Each time the node fails, it bumps the counter.\n\n**2. Conditional Routing Function**\nA should_retry function routes to retry or give up based on attempt count, checking if the max_retries threshold has been exceeded.\n\n**3. Fallback Node**\nA fallback node handles the exhausted retries case, returning messages about the failure after the maximum number of attempts.\n\n**4. Graph Construction**\nThe pattern uses add_conditional_edges to route from the main node to either retry back to itself, proceed to fallback, or continue to the end.\n\n### Production Best Practices:\n\nFor LLM/tool instability, limit retries and switch to simpler fallbacks (lighter model, cached response, human escalation).\n\nBy embedding error metadata within the graph state with fields such as error counts, types, and histories, developers can leverage this data for analytics, debugging, and escalation.\n\nIf your graph includes fallback nodes, conditional routing, or recovery logic, execution can continue gracefully. You might return a helpful message to the user, route to a recovery node, or record an error state for inspection.\n\nThis pattern ensures that production systems gracefully degrade when retry attempts are exhausted rather than failing completely.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"95bbf69e-3272-4f01-acc1-b495b5fb08e4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:40.252Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"8d898220-a0ae-49bd-9ffc-6dcb8ba3a5d0","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"39a7bc92-5b7d-4d5c-b07c-1d8c3fe4eaf6","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01UT5tFMBCJS3TZnccsFjduS","type":"tool_result","content":"Web search results for query: \"AI agent retry strategy model escalation sonnet to opus fallback pattern multi-model retry\"\n\nLinks: [{\"title\":\"Error Recovery and Fallback Strategies in AI Agent Development\",\"url\":\"https://www.gocodeo.com/post/error-recovery-and-fallback-strategies-in-ai-agent-development\"},{\"title\":\"FAILSAFE.md — The AI Agent Safe Fallback Standard\",\"url\":\"https://failsafe.md/\"},{\"title\":\"Exception Handling and Recovery in Agentic AI | atal upadhyay\",\"url\":\"https://atalupadhyay.wordpress.com/2026/03/16/exception-handling-and-recovery-in-agentic-ai/\"},{\"title\":\"Multi-agent workflows often fail. Here’s how to engineer ones that don’t. - The GitHub Blog\",\"url\":\"https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/multi-agent-workflows-often-fail-heres-how-to-engineer-ones-that-dont/\"},{\"title\":\"Fail-Safe Patterns for AI Agent Workflows\",\"url\":\"https://engineersmeetai.substack.com/p/fail-safe-patterns-for-ai-agent-workflows\"},{\"title\":\"Multi-Agent collaboration patterns with Strands Agents and Amazon Nova | Artificial Intelligence\",\"url\":\"https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/multi-agent-collaboration-patterns-with-strands-agents-and-amazon-nova/\"},{\"title\":\"4 Fault Tolerance Patterns Every AI Agent Needs in Production - DEV Community\",\"url\":\"https://dev.to/klement_gunndu/4-fault-tolerance-patterns-every-ai-agent-needs-in-production-jih\"},{\"title\":\"An ’undo-and-retry’ mechanism for agents - IBM Research\",\"url\":\"https://research.ibm.com/blog/undo-agent-for-cloud\"},{\"title\":\"Mastering Retry Logic Agents: A Deep Dive into 2025 Best ...\",\"url\":\"https://sparkco.ai/blog/mastering-retry-logic-agents-a-deep-dive-into-2025-best-practices\"},{\"title\":\"Agilesoftlabs\",\"url\":\"https://www.agilesoftlabs.com/blog/2026/03/multi-agent-ai-systems-enterprise-guide\"}]\n\nBased on the search results, here's comprehensive information about AI agent retry strategy, model escalation, and multi-model fallback patterns:\n\n## Core Retry Strategy Architecture\n\nA foundational approach uses four layers: Retry with backoff (survive transient errors), Model fallback chains (survive provider outages), Error classification (route errors correctly), and Checkpoint recovery (survive crashes). Each layer catches what the layer below it misses: Retry handles the 503 that resolves in 2 seconds, Fallback handles the provider outage that lasts 10 minutes, Error classification handles the tool error that no amount of retrying will fix, and Checkpointing handles the crash that kills the process entirely.\n\n## Model Escalation and Fallback Patterns\n\nWhen your primary LLM provider (e.g., GPT-4 API) is unavailable or times out, route the request to a secondary, smaller, or local model, ensuring your system continues to function even if with reduced quality or slower responses. Define at least one alternative model per provider, with cross-provider fallbacks (OpenAI → Anthropic) protecting against full provider outages.\n\n## Intelligent Retry Logic\n\nThe key architectural principle is progressive response to failure: first, try to self-correct; if that fails, try a fallback; if that fails, degrade gracefully; if degradation isn't possible, escalate clearly and informatively. When a tool fails, you do not retry the same call; instead, send the error back to the LLM so it can reformulate - if the database query had a syntax error, the LLM can fix it, or if the search returned no results, the LLM can broaden the query, making the LLM the error handler.\n\n## Practical Implementation Patterns\n\nUse an orchestrator pattern that invokes specialized fallback modules based on error type. Because tasks are discrete, a workflow controller can catch if an agent fails on a step and implement a retry or fallback just for that step, with no need to restart the entire process, improving robustness.\n\n\nREMINDER: You MUST include the sources above in your response to the user using markdown hyperlinks."}]},"uuid":"428fd01a-0f50-4f97-b729-83657fbff48e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:44.348Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"39a7bc92-5b7d-4d5c-b07c-1d8c3fe4eaf6","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"428fd01a-0f50-4f97-b729-83657fbff48e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EzGRyr2qHtmgHYQMGFDkj2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"Now let me look at what Wazir currently has for phase control and retry logic."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6180,"cache_read_input_tokens":18084,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":6180,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHWtgeR8oY8C2Frybk","type":"assistant","uuid":"b06e2585-e6eb-4439-9761-a7dcf9a9b720","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:54.267Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"b06e2585-e6eb-4439-9761-a7dcf9a9b720","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EzGRyr2qHtmgHYQMGFDkj2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_011Zz9RG5TfUe92BwxG4XKE1","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"retry|escalat|fallback|max_attempts|backoff","path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","glob":"*.{yaml,yml,ts,js,md}","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":20},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6180,"cache_read_input_tokens":18084,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":6180,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHWtgeR8oY8C2Frybk","type":"assistant","uuid":"1c72c63c-21d7-49dd-932a-77aff4802247","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:56.526Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1c72c63c-21d7-49dd-932a-77aff4802247","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_011Zz9RG5TfUe92BwxG4XKE1","parentToolUseID":"toolu_011Zz9RG5TfUe92BwxG4XKE1","uuid":"8d436c91-a29b-4f73-bacb-c0eecfbe30ae","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:56.528Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"8d436c91-a29b-4f73-bacb-c0eecfbe30ae","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_011Zz9RG5TfUe92BwxG4XKE1","toolUseID":"toolu_011Zz9RG5TfUe92BwxG4XKE1","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:56.621Z","uuid":"39631c33-0087-40b6-b12c-4ed286823d4c","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1c72c63c-21d7-49dd-932a-77aff4802247","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_011Zz9RG5TfUe92BwxG4XKE1","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 20 files limit: 20, offset: 0\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/clarifier.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/content-author.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/designer.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/executor.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/learner.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/planner.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/researcher.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/reviewer.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/specifier.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/agents/verifier.md\nexports/hosts/claude/.claude/commands/clarify.md\ndocs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/guard-hooks.test.js\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\ntooling/src/capture/store.js\ntooling/src/init/auto-detect.js\nskills/self-audit/SKILL.md\ndocs/reference/hooks.md"}]},"uuid":"0bcbfbac-a003-4a6c-b807-caa9a77695ef","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:56.621Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"1c72c63c-21d7-49dd-932a-77aff4802247","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0bcbfbac-a003-4a6c-b807-caa9a77695ef","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EzGRyr2qHtmgHYQMGFDkj2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01XFeWqgaLNWa7BM6CdexG7k","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"phase.*(fail|error|reject)|guardrail.*(fail|reject)|subagent.*(fail|error)","path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":20},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6180,"cache_read_input_tokens":18084,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":6180,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHWtgeR8oY8C2Frybk","type":"assistant","uuid":"6892743d-dd5e-4446-ad32-36c8dd51a4c3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:58.311Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6892743d-dd5e-4446-ad32-36c8dd51a4c3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01XFeWqgaLNWa7BM6CdexG7k","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01XFeWqgaLNWa7BM6CdexG7k","uuid":"e2052ee5-2f69-4514-9257-84d4b7f0aa66","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:58.312Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"e2052ee5-2f69-4514-9257-84d4b7f0aa66","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01XFeWqgaLNWa7BM6CdexG7k","toolUseID":"toolu_01XFeWqgaLNWa7BM6CdexG7k","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:58.390Z","uuid":"7ebeba0f-da14-4fd4-94ac-e511004d493b","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6892743d-dd5e-4446-ad32-36c8dd51a4c3","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01XFeWqgaLNWa7BM6CdexG7k","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 20 files limit: 20, offset: 0\ndocs/research/2026-03-20-enforcement-research.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/wazir/SKILL.md\ntooling/test/guards/phase-prerequisite-guard.test.js\ntooling/src/capture/command.js\ntooling/test/guards/validate-run-completion.test.js\nskills/self-audit/SKILL.md\nllms-full.txt\ndocs/reference/skill-tiers.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/process/ai-coding-antipatterns.md\ndocs/concepts/why-wazir.md\nCHANGELOG.md\ndocs/anti-patterns/AP-23-skipping-enabled-workflows.md\nREADME.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ntooling/test/capture.test.js\ndocs/reference/configuration-reference.md\nskills/writing-skills/SKILL.md\nskills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md\ndocs/plans/2026-03-15-cli-pipeline-integration-plan.md"}]},"uuid":"ced02f33-a9fd-44c6-a031-4326974eed5e","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:58.390Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"6892743d-dd5e-4446-ad32-36c8dd51a4c3","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"ced02f33-a9fd-44c6-a031-4326974eed5e","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01EzGRyr2qHtmgHYQMGFDkj2","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01UWUd9rdEfvhzNBQaVq3bFG","name":"Grep","input":{"pattern":"model.*(rout|select|escalat)|sonnet|opus|two.tier","path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","-i":true,"output_mode":"files_with_matches","head_limit":20},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":1,"cache_creation_input_tokens":6180,"cache_read_input_tokens":18084,"output_tokens":504,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":6180},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERHWtgeR8oY8C2Frybk","type":"assistant","uuid":"dcda11f6-3117-414b-a04e-435fb0057317","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:59.680Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"dcda11f6-3117-414b-a04e-435fb0057317","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Grep","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01UWUd9rdEfvhzNBQaVq3bFG","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UWUd9rdEfvhzNBQaVq3bFG","uuid":"98c7fa39-a202-4f90-b549-79d0f35a6ea7","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:59.680Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"98c7fa39-a202-4f90-b549-79d0f35a6ea7","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Grep","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01UWUd9rdEfvhzNBQaVq3bFG","toolUseID":"toolu_01UWUd9rdEfvhzNBQaVq3bFG","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:59.748Z","uuid":"06a57d85-90a8-49b9-b71e-e9092f7815bc","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"dcda11f6-3117-414b-a04e-435fb0057317","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01UWUd9rdEfvhzNBQaVq3bFG","type":"tool_result","content":"Found 20 files limit: 20, offset: 0\nskills/brainstorming/SKILL.md\nskills/reviewer/SKILL.md\nskills/executor/SKILL.md\ninput/2026-03-20-remaining.md\nskills/init-pipeline/SKILL.md\npackage.json\nllms-full.txt\nskills/claude-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/gemini-cli/SKILL.md\nskills/codex-cli/SKILL.md\ntooling/src/adapters/model-router.js\ntooling/test/adapters/model-router.test.js\nskills/prepare-next/SKILL.md\ndocs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md\ntooling/src/checks/runtime-surface.js\nAGENTS.md\ntemplates/task-definition-schema.md\nexpertise/backend/python-fastapi.md\nexpertise/antipatterns/frontend/flutter-antipatterns.md\nexpertise/architecture/data/search-architecture.md"}]},"uuid":"1d9b5eda-0172-4416-81da-1cad36eadfea","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:34:59.748Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"dcda11f6-3117-414b-a04e-435fb0057317","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"1d9b5eda-0172-4416-81da-1cad36eadfea","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01T672mU4bSC2CfrDXT7oGaz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nLet me look at Wazir's existing model router and relevant phase control mechanisms."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1572,"cache_read_input_tokens":24264,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1572,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJbS4T13Q1sbS9sd5h","type":"assistant","uuid":"49911887-2120-423b-8b97-c0d5ffde75b2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:08.569Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"49911887-2120-423b-8b97-c0d5ffde75b2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01T672mU4bSC2CfrDXT7oGaz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_016dVERcpEmWSnQ9PFkqm8wh","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/tooling/src/adapters/model-router.js"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1572,"cache_read_input_tokens":24264,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1572,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJbS4T13Q1sbS9sd5h","type":"assistant","uuid":"055c5cdb-9714-4874-8f6b-3bd65d107429","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.021Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"055c5cdb-9714-4874-8f6b-3bd65d107429","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_016dVERcpEmWSnQ9PFkqm8wh","parentToolUseID":"toolu_016dVERcpEmWSnQ9PFkqm8wh","uuid":"0b297a97-260c-4c1e-90c5-85df2eee40dc","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.021Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0b297a97-260c-4c1e-90c5-85df2eee40dc","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_016dVERcpEmWSnQ9PFkqm8wh","toolUseID":"toolu_016dVERcpEmWSnQ9PFkqm8wh","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.075Z","uuid":"fedfb653-828b-47af-909a-fb9fee4bafd2","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"055c5cdb-9714-4874-8f6b-3bd65d107429","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_016dVERcpEmWSnQ9PFkqm8wh","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→/**\n     2→ * Model routing table — maps task types to recommended models.\n     3→ * @type {Object<string, {model: string, reason: string}>}\n     4→ */\n     5→const MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE = {\n     6→  // Mechanical tasks — Haiku\n     7→  'fetch-url':           { model: 'haiku', reason: 'Mechanical, no reasoning needed' },\n     8→  'write-handoff':       { model: 'haiku', reason: 'Structured file operations' },\n     9→  'compress-archive':    { model: 'haiku', reason: 'File manipulation' },\n    10→\n    11→  // Comprehension tasks — Sonnet\n    12→  'read-summarize':      { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Comprehension, not deep reasoning' },\n    13→  'write-implementation':{ model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Good spec + plan = mechanical coding' },\n    14→  'task-review':         { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Diff review against clear spec' },\n    15→  'extract-learnings':   { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Structured extraction' },\n    16→  'internal-review':     { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Pattern matching against expertise' },\n    17→  'run-tests':           { model: 'sonnet', reason: 'Test execution and analysis' },\n    18→\n    19→  // Judgment tasks — Opus\n    20→  'orchestrate':         { model: 'opus', reason: 'Needs judgment and coordination' },\n    21→  'spec-harden':         { model: 'opus', reason: 'Adversarial thinking required' },\n    22→  'design':              { model: 'opus', reason: 'Creativity + architecture decisions' },\n    23→  'final-review':        { model: 'opus', reason: 'Holistic judgment against original input' },\n    24→  'brainstorm':          { model: 'opus', reason: 'Creative exploration' },\n    25→  'plan':                { model: 'opus', reason: 'Strategic task decomposition' },\n    26→};\n    27→\n    28→/**\n    29→ * Get the recommended model for a task type.\n    30→ *\n    31→ * If multi-model mode is not enabled, returns `{ model: 'inherit' }`.\n    32→ * If config contains `model_overrides`, those take precedence over the\n    33→ * default routing table.  Unknown task types fall back to 'opus' (safe\n    34→ * default — never under-model a task).\n    35→ *\n    36→ * @param {string} taskType - one of the keys in MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE\n    37→ * @param {object} config - project config (may override routing)\n    38→ * @returns {{model: string, reason: string, overridden: boolean}}\n    39→ */\n    40→export function getModelForTask(taskType, config = {}) {\n    41→  if (!isMultiModelEnabled(config)) {\n    42→    return { model: 'inherit', reason: 'Multi-model mode not enabled', overridden: false };\n    43→  }\n    44→\n    45→  // Check config-level overrides first\n    46→  const overrides = config.model_overrides ?? {};\n    47→  if (overrides[taskType]) {\n    48→    return {\n    49→      model: overrides[taskType].model ?? 'opus',\n    50→      reason: overrides[taskType].reason ?? 'Config override',\n    51→      overridden: true,\n    52→    };\n    53→  }\n    54→\n    55→  // Look up the default routing table\n    56→  const entry = MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE[taskType];\n    57→  if (entry) {\n    58→    return { model: entry.model, reason: entry.reason, overridden: false };\n    59→  }\n    60→\n    61→  // Unknown task type — safe default is opus (never under-model)\n    62→  return { model: 'opus', reason: 'Unknown task type — safe default', overridden: false };\n    63→}\n    64→\n    65→/**\n    66→ * Check if multi-model mode is enabled.\n    67→ * @param {object} config\n    68→ * @returns {boolean}\n    69→ */\n    70→export function isMultiModelEnabled(config = {}) {\n    71→  return config.model_mode === 'multi-model';\n    72→}\n    73→\n    74→/**\n    75→ * Get all routing decisions for logging/stats.\n    76→ * @returns {Object<string, {model: string, reason: string}>}\n    77→ */\n    78→export function getRoutingTable() {\n    79→  const copy = {};\n    80→  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(MODEL_ROUTING_TABLE)) {\n    81→    copy[key] = { ...value };\n    82→  }\n    83→  return copy;\n    84→}\n    85→"}]},"uuid":"fce27593-379f-4f19-bb29-babfe16387fa","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.075Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"055c5cdb-9714-4874-8f6b-3bd65d107429","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"fce27593-379f-4f19-bb29-babfe16387fa","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01T672mU4bSC2CfrDXT7oGaz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_015JVNTsVf7M3nxTm38KHsKh","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1572,"cache_read_input_tokens":24264,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1572,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":2,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJbS4T13Q1sbS9sd5h","type":"assistant","uuid":"af87677b-0876-4960-b974-86ce4989f139","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.459Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"af87677b-0876-4960-b974-86ce4989f139","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_015JVNTsVf7M3nxTm38KHsKh","parentToolUseID":"toolu_015JVNTsVf7M3nxTm38KHsKh","uuid":"6dbf42c7-d008-4bad-83ed-635229d5ee31","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.460Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"6dbf42c7-d008-4bad-83ed-635229d5ee31","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_015JVNTsVf7M3nxTm38KHsKh","toolUseID":"toolu_015JVNTsVf7M3nxTm38KHsKh","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.516Z","uuid":"c5a0717d-c898-49df-bd42-2fc92a8b8b13","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"af87677b-0876-4960-b974-86ce4989f139","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_015JVNTsVf7M3nxTm38KHsKh","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:subagent-driven-development\n     3→description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Subagent-Driven Development\n     7→\n     8→## Command Routing\n     9→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    10→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    11→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    12→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    13→\n    14→## Codebase Exploration\n    15→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    16→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    17→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    18→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    19→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    20→\n    21→Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review.\n    22→\n    23→**Why subagents:** You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.\n    24→\n    25→**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration\n    26→\n    27→## When to Use\n    28→\n    29→```dot\n    30→digraph when_to_use {\n    31→    \"Have implementation plan?\" [shape=diamond];\n    32→    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [shape=diamond];\n    33→    \"Stay in this session?\" [shape=diamond];\n    34→    \"subagent-driven-development\" [shape=box];\n    35→    \"executing-plans\" [shape=box];\n    36→    \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [shape=box];\n    37→\n    38→    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Tasks mostly independent?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    39→    \"Have implementation plan?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no\"];\n    40→    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Stay in this session?\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    41→    \"Tasks mostly independent?\" -> \"Manual execution or brainstorm first\" [label=\"no - tightly coupled\"];\n    42→    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"subagent-driven-development\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    43→    \"Stay in this session?\" -> \"executing-plans\" [label=\"no - parallel session\"];\n    44→}\n    45→```\n    46→\n    47→**vs. Executing Plans (parallel session):**\n    48→- Same session (no context switch)\n    49→- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution)\n    50→- Two-stage review after each task: spec compliance first, then code quality\n    51→- Faster iteration (no human-in-loop between tasks)\n    52→\n    53→## The Process\n    54→\n    55→```dot\n    56→digraph process {\n    57→    rankdir=TB;\n    58→\n    59→    subgraph cluster_per_task {\n    60→        label=\"Per Task\";\n    61→        \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\" [shape=box];\n    62→        \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n    63→        \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" [shape=diamond];\n    64→        \"Answer questions, provide context\" [shape=box];\n    65→        \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [shape=box];\n    66→        \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n    67→        \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" [shape=diamond];\n    68→        \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [shape=box];\n    69→        \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [shape=box];\n    70→        \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" [shape=diamond];\n    71→        \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [shape=box];\n    72→        \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    73→    }\n    74→\n    75→    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" [shape=box];\n    76→    \"More tasks remain?\" [shape=diamond];\n    77→    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [shape=box];\n    78→    \"Use wz:finishing-a-development-branch\" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];\n    79→\n    80→    \"Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite\" -> \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\";\n    81→    \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\" -> \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\";\n    82→    \"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\";\n    83→    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Answer questions, provide context\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    84→    \"Answer questions, provide context\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\";\n    85→    \"Implementer subagent asks questions?\" -> \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" [label=\"no\"];\n    86→    \"Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    87→    \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\";\n    88→    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    89→    \"Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" [label=\"no\"];\n    90→    \"Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps\" -> \"Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    91→    \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\" -> \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\";\n    92→    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    93→    \"Code quality reviewer subagent approves?\" -> \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" [label=\"no\"];\n    94→    \"Implementer subagent fixes quality issues\" -> \"Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)\";\n    95→    \"Mark task complete in TodoWrite\" -> \"More tasks remain?\";\n    96→    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Capture PRE_TASK_SHA\" [label=\"yes\"];\n    97→    \"More tasks remain?\" -> \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" [label=\"no\"];\n    98→    \"Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation\" -> \"Use wz:finishing-a-development-branch\";\n    99→}\n   100→```\n   101→\n   102→### Code Review Scoping\n   103→\n   104→The implementer subagent commits before review. The spec reviewer and code quality reviewer must use `codex review --base <pre-task-sha>` to scope their review to the task's changes. Capture `PRE_TASK_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)` before dispatching the implementer.\n   105→\n   106→### Review Loop Alignment\n   107→\n   108→Both review stages follow the review loop pattern in `docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md` with explicit `--mode task-review`:\n   109→- **Spec compliance review:** Uses spec dimensions with `--mode task-review`\n   110→- **Code quality review:** Uses 5 task-execution dimensions with `--mode task-review`\n   111→\n   112→Review logs use task-scoped filenames: `execute-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md`\n   113→\n   114→Each review stage respects the loop cap via `wazir capture loop-check --task-id <NNN>`. If the cap is reached (exit 43), escalate to the controller (you) for a decision.\n   115→\n   116→### Codex Error Handling\n   117→\n   118→If codex exits non-zero during review, log the error, mark the pass as codex-unavailable, and use self-review findings only. Do not treat a Codex failure as a clean pass.\n   119→\n   120→**Standalone mode:** When no `.wazir/runs/latest/` exists, review logs go to `docs/plans/`.\n   121→\n   122→## Prompt Templates\n   123→\n   124→- `./implementer-prompt.md` - Dispatch implementer subagent\n   125→- `./spec-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch spec compliance reviewer subagent\n   126→- `./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md` - Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent\n   127→\n   128→## Advantages\n   129→\n   130→**vs. Manual execution:**\n   131→- Subagents follow TDD naturally\n   132→- Fresh context per task (no confusion)\n   133→- Parallel-safe (subagents don't interfere)\n   134→- Subagent can ask questions (before AND during work)\n   135→\n   136→**vs. Executing Plans:**\n   137→- Same session (no handoff)\n   138→- Continuous progress (no waiting)\n   139→- Review checkpoints automatic\n   140→\n   141→**Efficiency gains:**\n   142→- No file reading overhead (controller provides full text)\n   143→- Controller curates exactly what context is needed\n   144→- Subagent gets complete information upfront\n   145→- Questions surfaced before work begins (not after)\n   146→\n   147→**Quality gates:**\n   148→- Self-review catches issues before handoff\n   149→- Two-stage review: spec compliance, then code quality\n   150→- Review loops ensure fixes actually work\n   151→- Spec compliance prevents over/under-building\n   152→- Code quality ensures implementation is well-built\n   153→\n   154→**Cost:**\n   155→- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)\n   156→- Controller does more prep work (extracting all tasks upfront)\n   157→- Review loops add iterations\n   158→- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging later)\n   159→\n   160→## Red Flags\n   161→\n   162→**Never:**\n   163→- Start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent\n   164→- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)\n   165→- Proceed with unfixed issues\n   166→- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)\n   167→- Make subagent read plan file (provide full text instead)\n   168→- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where task fits)\n   169→- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)\n   170→- Accept \"close enough\" on spec compliance (spec reviewer found issues = not done)\n   171→- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues = implementer fixes = review again)\n   172→- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)\n   173→- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is PASS** (wrong order)\n   174→- Move to next task while either review has open issues\n   175→- **Review the wrong diff -- always scope to the current task's changes using --base**\n   176→\n   177→**If subagent asks questions:**\n   178→- Answer clearly and completely\n   179→- Provide additional context if needed\n   180→- Don't rush them into implementation\n   181→\n   182→**If reviewer finds issues:**\n   183→- Implementer (same subagent) fixes them\n   184→- Reviewer reviews again\n   185→- Repeat until approved\n   186→- Don't skip the re-review\n   187→\n   188→**If subagent fails task:**\n   189→- Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions\n   190→- Don't try to fix manually (context pollution)\n   191→"}]},"uuid":"4ce09579-8d07-45f3-a2d7-05948e217db4","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.516Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"af87677b-0876-4960-b974-86ce4989f139","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4ce09579-8d07-45f3-a2d7-05948e217db4","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_01T672mU4bSC2CfrDXT7oGaz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01U58Vd6BTcbByRrEY4mHbfK","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/reference/review-loop-pattern.md"},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":1572,"cache_read_input_tokens":24264,"output_tokens":234,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":1572},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERJbS4T13Q1sbS9sd5h","type":"assistant","uuid":"cb267bcf-421b-4d2f-83c9-aa7c0e9503d2","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.978Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cb267bcf-421b-4d2f-83c9-aa7c0e9503d2","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01U58Vd6BTcbByRrEY4mHbfK","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01U58Vd6BTcbByRrEY4mHbfK","uuid":"658a1ebb-4d58-4306-b546-9af91679a0d3","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:09.978Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"658a1ebb-4d58-4306-b546-9af91679a0d3","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01U58Vd6BTcbByRrEY4mHbfK","toolUseID":"toolu_01U58Vd6BTcbByRrEY4mHbfK","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:29.756Z","uuid":"cadc14c2-3251-4125-b4f8-91543b89d9ef","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"cb267bcf-421b-4d2f-83c9-aa7c0e9503d2","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01U58Vd6BTcbByRrEY4mHbfK","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Review Loop Pattern Reference\n     2→\n     3→Canonical reference for the review loop pattern used across all Wazir pipeline phases. Skills and workflows link to this document rather than embedding loop logic inline.\n     4→\n     5→---\n     6→\n     7→## Core Principle: Producer-Reviewer Separation\n     8→\n     9→The producer skill (clarifier, planner, designer, etc.) **emits** an artifact and calls for review. The **reviewer role** owns the review loop. The producer receives findings and resolves them. No role reviews its own output.\n    10→\n    11→```\n    12→Producer emits artifact\n    13→  -> Reviewer runs review loop (N passes, Codex if available)\n    14→  -> Findings returned to producer\n    15→  -> Producer fixes and resubmits\n    16→  -> Loop until all passes exhausted or cap reached\n    17→  -> Escalate to user if cap exceeded\n    18→```\n    19→\n    20→When Codex is available, the reviewer role delegates to `codex review` as a secondary input while maintaining its own independent primary verdict.\n    21→\n    22→---\n    23→\n    24→## Per-Task Review vs Final Review\n    25→\n    26→These are two structurally different constructs:\n    27→\n    28→| | Per-Task Review | Final Review |\n    29→|---|---|---|\n    30→| **When** | During execution, after each task | After all execution + verification complete |\n    31→| **Dimensions** | 5 task-execution dims (correctness, tests, wiring, drift, quality) | 9 scored dims (correctness, completeness, wiring, verification, drift, quality, documentation, intent alignment, scope coverage) |\n    32→| **Scope** | Single task's uncommitted changes | Entire implementation vs spec/plan |\n    33→| **Output** | Pass/fix loop, no score | Scored verdict (0-90), PASS/FAIL |\n    34→| **Workflow** | Inline in execution flow | `workflows/review.md` |\n    35→| **Skill** | `wz:reviewer` in `task-review` mode | `wz:reviewer` in `final` mode |\n    36→| **Log filename** | `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` | `final-review.md` |\n    37→\n    38→---\n    39→\n    40→## Standalone Mode\n    41→\n    42→When no `.wazir/runs/latest/` directory exists (standalone skill invocation outside a pipeline run):\n    43→\n    44→1. **Review loops still run** -- the review logic is embedded in the skill, not dependent on run state.\n    45→2. **Artifact location** -- artifacts live in `docs/plans/`. This is the canonical standalone artifact path.\n    46→3. **Review log location** -- review logs go alongside the artifact: `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md`. No temp dir.\n    47→4. **Loop cap is SKIPPED entirely** -- no `wazir capture loop-check` call. The loop runs for exactly `pass_counts[depth]` passes (3/5/7) and stops. No cap guard, no fallback constant.\n    48→5. **`wazir capture loop-check`** -- not invoked in standalone mode. The standalone detection happens before the cap guard call.\n    49→\n    50→Detection logic:\n    51→\n    52→```\n    53→if .wazir/runs/latest/ exists:\n    54→  run_mode = \"pipeline\"\n    55→  log_dir = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/\n    56→  cap_guard = wazir capture loop-check (full guard)\n    57→else:\n    58→  run_mode = \"standalone\"\n    59→  artifact_dir = docs/plans/\n    60→  log_dir = docs/plans/  (alongside artifact)\n    61→  cap_guard = none (depth pass count is the only limit)\n    62→```\n    63→\n    64→---\n    65→\n    66→## Review Loop Pseudocode\n    67→\n    68→```\n    69→review_loop(artifact_path, phase, dimensions[], depth, config, options={}):\n    70→\n    71→  # options.mode      -- explicit review mode (required)\n    72→  # options.task_id   -- task identifier for task-scoped reviews (optional)\n    73→\n    74→  # Standalone detection\n    75→  run_mode = detect_run_mode()  # \"pipeline\" or \"standalone\"\n    76→\n    77→  # Fixed pass counts -- no extension\n    78→  pass_counts = { quick: 3, standard: 5, deep: 7 }\n    79→  total_passes = pass_counts[depth]\n    80→\n    81→  # Depth-aware dimension subsets (coverage contract)\n    82→  depth_dimensions = {\n    83→    quick:    dimensions[0:3],     # first 3 dimensions only\n    84→    standard: dimensions[0:5],     # first 5\n    85→    deep:     dimensions,          # all available\n    86→  }\n    87→  active_dims = depth_dimensions[depth]\n    88→\n    89→  codex_available = check_codex()  # which codex && codex --version\n    90→\n    91→  for pass_number in 0..total_passes-1:\n    92→\n    93→    # --- Cap guard check (pipeline mode only, before each pass) ---\n    94→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n    95→      loop_check_args = \"--run <run-id> --phase <phase> --loop-count <pass_number+1>\"\n    96→      if options.task_id:\n    97→        loop_check_args += \" --task-id <task_id>\"\n    98→      wazir capture loop-check $loop_check_args\n    99→      # loop-check wraps: event capture + evaluateLoopCapGuard\n   100→      # If loop_cap_guard fires (exit 43), stop immediately:\n   101→      if last_exit_code == 43:\n   102→        log(\"Loop cap reached for phase: <phase>. Escalating to user.\")\n   103→        escalate_to_user(evidence_gathered_so_far)\n   104→        return { pass_count: pass_number, escalated: true }\n   105→    # Standalone mode: no cap guard. Loop runs for total_passes and stops.\n   106→\n   107→    dimension = active_dims[pass_number % len(active_dims)]\n   108→\n   109→    # --- Primary review (reviewer role, not producer) ---\n   110→    # Mode is always explicit -- passed by caller via options.mode\n   111→    findings = self_review(artifact_path, focus=dimension, mode=options.mode)\n   112→\n   113→    # --- Secondary review (Codex, if available) ---\n   114→    if codex_available:\n   115→      codex_exit_code, codex_output = run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension)\n   116→      if codex_exit_code != 0:\n   117→        # Codex failed -- log error, fall back to self-review for this pass\n   118→        log_error(\"Codex exited \" + codex_exit_code + \": \" + codex_output.stderr)\n   119→        mark_pass_codex_unavailable(pass_number)\n   120→        # Do NOT treat Codex failure as clean. Self-review findings stand alone.\n   121→      else:\n   122→        codex_findings = parse(codex_output.stdout)\n   123→        merge(findings, codex_findings, preserve_attribution=true)\n   124→\n   125→    # --- Log the review pass ---\n   126→    if run_mode == \"pipeline\":\n   127→      if options.task_id:\n   128→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-task-<task_id>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   129→      else:\n   130→        log_path = .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   131→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   132→    else:\n   133→      log_path = docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   134→      log(pass_number+1, dimension, findings) -> log_path\n   135→\n   136→    if findings.has_issues:\n   137→      # --- Fix and re-submit (MANDATORY) ---\n   138→      # The producer MUST fix findings and the reviewer MUST re-review.\n   139→      # \"Fix and continue without re-review\" is EXPLICITLY PROHIBITED.\n   140→      producer_fix(artifact_path, findings)\n   141→      # Continue to next pass -- the fix will be re-reviewed\n   142→\n   143→  # --- Post-loop: escalation if issues remain ---\n   144→  if remaining.has_issues:\n   145→    # Cap reached with unresolved findings. Present to user:\n   146→    # 1. Approve with known issues (Recommended if non-blocking)\n   147→    # 2. Fix manually and re-run\n   148→    # 3. Abort\n   149→    escalate_to_user(remaining, options=[\n   150→      \"approve-with-issues\",\n   151→      \"fix-manually-and-rerun\",\n   152→      \"abort\"\n   153→    ])\n   154→    # User decides. If approved, log \"user-approved-with-issues\" in final pass file.\n   155→\n   156→  return { pass_count: total_passes, issues_found, issues_fixed, remaining, attributions }\n   157→```\n   158→\n   159→Key properties of this pseudocode:\n   160→\n   161→1. **Fixed pass counts** -- Quick is exactly 3, standard exactly 5, deep exactly 7. No `max_passes = min_passes + 3`. No clean-streak early-exit. No extension.\n   162→2. **Task-scoped log filenames** -- `<phase>-task-<NNN>-review-pass-<N>.md` for per-task reviews, preventing log clobbering in parallel mode.\n   163→3. **Task-scoped loop cap keys** -- `--task-id` flag on `loop-check` so each task gets its own counter in `phase_loop_counts`.\n   164→4. **Explicit review mode** -- `options.mode` is always passed by the caller. No auto-detection.\n   165→5. **Codex error handling** -- non-zero exit is logged, pass marked `codex-unavailable`, self-review findings used alone. Never treated as clean.\n   166→6. **Standalone mode** -- uses `docs/plans/` for artifacts and logs. No temp dir. No cap guard at all.\n   167→\n   168→---\n   169→\n   170→## Codex Error Handling Contract\n   171→\n   172→```\n   173→run_codex_review(artifact_path, dimension):\n   174→  CODEX_MODEL = read_config('.wazir/state/config.json', '.multi_tool.codex.model') or \"gpt-5.4\"\n   175→\n   176→  if is_code_artifact:\n   177→    cmd = codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"...\" \"Review for [dimension]...\"\n   178→    # or: codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base <sha> for committed changes\n   179→  else:\n   180→    cmd = cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this [type] for [dimension]...\"\n   181→\n   182→  result = execute(cmd, timeout=120s, capture_stderr=true)\n   183→\n   184→  if result.exit_code != 0:\n   185→    return (result.exit_code, { stderr: result.stderr, stdout: \"\" })\n   186→    # Caller handles: log error, mark codex-unavailable, use self-review only\n   187→\n   188→  return (0, { stdout: result.stdout, stderr: result.stderr })\n   189→```\n   190→\n   191→Rules:\n   192→\n   193→- If Codex exits non-zero, log the full stderr.\n   194→- Mark the pass as `codex-unavailable` in the review log metadata.\n   195→- Fall back to self-review for that pass only. Do not skip the pass.\n   196→- Do not retry Codex on the same pass. If Codex fails on pass 2, pass 3 still tries Codex (transient failures recover).\n   197→- Never treat a Codex failure as a clean review pass.\n   198→\n   199→---\n   200→\n   201→## Codex Availability Probe\n   202→\n   203→Before any Codex call, verify availability once at loop start:\n   204→\n   205→```bash\n   206→which codex >/dev/null 2>&1 && codex --version >/dev/null 2>&1\n   207→```\n   208→\n   209→If the probe fails, set `codex_available = false` for the entire loop. Fall back to self-review only. Never error out.\n   210→\n   211→Per-invocation failures (Codex available but a single call fails) are handled separately by the error contract above.\n   212→\n   213→---\n   214→\n   215→## Codex Artifact-Scoped Review\n   216→\n   217→Never use `codex review` for non-code artifacts (specs, plans, designs). Instead, pipe the artifact content via stdin:\n   218→\n   219→```bash\n   220→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   221→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   222→cat .wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md | \\\n   223→  codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \"Review this specification for: [dimension]. Be specific, cite sections. Say CLEAN if no issues.\" \\\n   224→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/spec-challenge-review-pass-N.md\n   225→```\n   226→\n   227→For code artifacts, use `codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted` (or `--base` for committed changes). See the next section for details.\n   228→\n   229→---\n   230→\n   231→## Code Review Scoping\n   232→\n   233→**Rule: review BEFORE commit.**\n   234→\n   235→For each task during execution:\n   236→\n   237→1. Implement the task (changes are uncommitted).\n   238→2. Review the uncommitted changes using the **5 task-execution dimensions** (NOT the 9 final-review dimensions):\n   239→   ```bash\n   240→   CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   241→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   242→   codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   243→     \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   244→     2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   245→   ```\n   246→3. Fix any findings (still uncommitted).\n   247→4. Re-review until all passes exhausted or cap reached.\n   248→5. **Only after review passes:** commit with conventional commit format.\n   249→\n   250→**If changes are already committed** (e.g., subagent workflow where the implementer subagent commits before review):\n   251→\n   252→```bash\n   253→# Capture the SHA before the task starts\n   254→PRE_TASK_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)\n   255→\n   256→# ... subagent implements and commits ...\n   257→\n   258→# Review the committed changes against the pre-task baseline\n   259→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   260→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   261→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --base $PRE_TASK_SHA --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   262→  \"Review against acceptance criteria: <criteria>\" \\\n   263→  2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/execute-task-NNN-review-pass-N.md\n   264→```\n   265→\n   266→---\n   267→\n   268→## Dimension Sets\n   269→\n   270→### Research Dimensions (5)\n   271→\n   272→1. **Coverage** -- all briefing topics researched\n   273→2. **Source quality** -- authoritative, current sources\n   274→3. **Relevance** -- research answers the actual questions\n   275→4. **Gaps** -- missing info that blocks later phases\n   276→5. **Contradictions** -- conflicting sources identified\n   277→\n   278→### Spec/Clarification Dimensions (5)\n   279→\n   280→1. **Completeness** -- all requirements covered\n   281→2. **Testability** -- each criterion verifiable\n   282→3. **Ambiguity** -- no dual-interpretation statements\n   283→4. **Assumptions** -- hidden assumptions explicit\n   284→5. **Scope creep** -- nothing beyond briefing\n   285→\n   286→### Design-Review Dimensions (5)\n   287→\n   288→Matches canonical `workflows/design-review.md`:\n   289→\n   290→1. **Spec coverage** -- does the design address every acceptance criterion with a visual component?\n   291→2. **Design-spec consistency** -- does the design introduce anything not in the spec? (scope creep check)\n   292→3. **Accessibility** -- color contrast ratios (WCAG 2.1 AA), focus states, touch target sizes (44x44px minimum)\n   293→4. **Visual consistency** -- design tokens form a coherent system, dark/light mode alignment\n   294→5. **Exported-code fidelity** -- do exported scaffolds match the designs? Mismatches are failures here, not implementation concerns.\n   295→\n   296→### Plan Dimensions (8)\n   297→\n   298→1. **Completeness** -- all design decisions mapped to tasks\n   299→2. **Ordering** -- dependencies correct, parallelizable identified\n   300→3. **Atomicity** -- each task fits one session\n   301→4. **Testability** -- concrete verification per task\n   302→5. **Edge cases** -- error paths covered\n   303→6. **Security** -- auth, injection, data exposure\n   304→7. **Integration** -- tasks connect end-to-end\n   305→8. **Input Coverage** -- every distinct item in the original input maps to at least one task. If `tasks < input items`, HIGH finding listing missing items\n   306→\n   307→### Task Execution Dimensions (5)\n   308→\n   309→Used for per-task review during execution:\n   310→\n   311→1. **Correctness** -- code matches spec\n   312→2. **Tests** -- real tests, not mocked/faked\n   313→3. **Wiring** -- all paths connected\n   314→4. **Drift** -- matches task spec\n   315→5. **Quality** -- naming, error handling\n   316→\n   317→### Final Review Dimensions (9)\n   318→\n   319→Used for `workflows/review.md` scored gate:\n   320→\n   321→1. **Correctness** -- does the code do what the spec says?\n   322→2. **Completeness** -- are all acceptance criteria met?\n   323→3. **Wiring** -- are all paths connected end-to-end?\n   324→4. **Verification** -- is there evidence (tests, type checks) for each claim?\n   325→5. **Drift** -- does the implementation match the approved plan?\n   326→6. **Quality** -- code style, naming, error handling, security\n   327→7. **Documentation** -- changelog entries, commit messages, comments\n   328→8. **Intent Alignment** -- does the implementation match what the user originally asked for, including mid-run corrections from `user-input-log.ndjson`? Compare against the RAW INPUT, not the spec. Score 0 if implementation contradicts a user correction.\n   329→9. **Scope Coverage** -- count distinct items in the original input vs items implemented. Flag missing items as HIGH. Score = (implemented / input items) * 10.\n   330→\n   331→The final review dimensions are the existing 9 from `skills/reviewer/SKILL.md`. `workflows/review.md` is not modified by this pattern.\n   332→\n   333→---\n   334→\n   335→## Per-Depth Coverage Contract\n   336→\n   337→| Depth | Research | Spec | Design-Review | Plan | Task Execution | Final Review |\n   338→|-------|----------|------|---------------|------|----------------|--------------|\n   339→| Quick | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | dims 1-3, 3 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   340→| Standard | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | dims 1-5, 5 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   341→| Deep | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | dims 1-7, 7 passes | dims 1-5, 7 passes | always 9 dims, 1 pass |\n   342→\n   343→Pass counts are FIXED per depth. Quick = 3 passes, standard = 5 passes, deep = 7 passes. No extension. No early-exit. Final review is always a single scored pass across all 9 dimensions -- it is a gate, not a loop.\n   344→\n   345→---\n   346→\n   347→## Loop Cap Configuration\n   348→\n   349→The `workflow_policy` section of `run-config.yaml` (legacy: `phase_policy`) controls which workflows are enabled and sets an absolute safety ceiling per workflow. Only two fields exist: `enabled` and `loop_cap`. There is no `passes` field -- depth determines pass counts (3/5/7), not workflow policy.\n   350→\n   351→```yaml\n   352→workflow_policy:\n   353→  # Clarifier phase workflows\n   354→  discover:       { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   355→  clarify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   356→  specify:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   357→  spec-challenge: { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   358→  author:         { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   359→  design:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   360→  design-review:  { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   361→  plan:           { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   362→  plan-review:    { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   363→  # Executor phase workflows\n   364→  execute:        { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   365→  verify:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   366→  review:         { enabled: true, loop_cap: 10 }\n   367→  learn:          { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   368→  prepare_next:   { enabled: true, loop_cap: 5 }\n   369→  run_audit:      { enabled: false, loop_cap: 10 }\n   370→```\n   371→\n   372→**`loop_cap`** is an absolute safety ceiling that prevents runaway loops regardless of depth. It is checked by `wazir capture loop-check` in pipeline mode. It is NOT the same as pass count (which is determined by depth: 3/5/7). Example: depth=deep gives 7 passes, but if `loop_cap: 5`, the cap guard fires at pass 5 and escalates. This is intentional -- the operator can constrain expensive phases.\n   373→\n   374→**Adaptive workflows** (`author`, `run_audit`) default to `enabled: false`. They are activated by explicit operator config or intent detection.\n   375→\n   376→**Post-run workflows** (`learn`, `prepare_next`) default to `enabled: true`. They run as part of the Final Review phase:\n   377→\n   378→- `learn` extracts durable learnings from review findings -- recurring findings become accepted learnings.\n   379→- `prepare_next` prepares context and handoff for the next run.\n   380→- `author` has a human approval gate, not an iterative review loop.\n   381→- `run_audit` is an on-demand standalone audit, not part of the main pipeline flow.\n   382→\n   383→---\n   384→\n   385→## Reviewer Mode Table\n   386→\n   387→The reviewer skill operates in different modes depending on the phase. **Mode is always explicit** -- the caller passes `--mode <mode>`. There is no auto-detection based on artifact availability.\n   388→\n   389→| Mode | Invoked during | Prerequisites | Dimensions | Output |\n   390→|------|---------------|---------------|------------|--------|\n   391→| `final` | After execution + verification | Completed task artifacts in `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/` | 9 final-review dims, scored 0-90 | Verdict: PASS/NEEDS FIXES/NEEDS REWORK/FAIL |\n   392→| `spec-challenge` | After specify | Draft spec artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   393→| `design-review` | After design approval | Design artifact, approved spec, accessibility guidelines | 5 design-review dims (canonical) | Findings with severity (blocking/advisory) |\n   394→| `plan-review` | After planning | Draft plan, approved spec, design artifact | 7 plan dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   395→| `task-review` | During execution, per task | Uncommitted changes (or committed with known base SHA) | 5 task-execution dims | Pass/fail per task, no score |\n   396→| `research-review` | During discover | Research artifact | 5 research dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   397→| `clarification-review` | During clarify | Clarification artifact | 5 spec/clarification dims | Findings with severity, no score |\n   398→\n   399→If `--mode` is not provided, the reviewer asks the user which review to run. Auto-detection based on artifact availability is NOT used -- it causes ambiguity in resumed/multi-phase runs where stale artifacts from prior phases exist.\n   400→\n   401→Each caller is responsible for passing the correct mode:\n   402→\n   403→- Clarifier passes `--mode clarification-review` after Phase 1A\n   404→- Discover workflow passes `--mode research-review` after research\n   405→- Specifier flow passes `--mode spec-challenge` after specify\n   406→- Brainstorming passes `--mode design-review` after user approval\n   407→- Writing-plans passes `--mode plan-review` after planning\n   408→- Executor passes `--mode task-review` for each task\n   409→- `/wazir` runner passes `--mode final` for the final review gate\n   410→\n   411→---\n   412→\n   413→## Codex Prompt Templates\n   414→\n   415→All Codex invocations read the model from config with a fallback:\n   416→\n   417→```bash\n   418→CODEX_MODEL=$(jq -r '.multi_tool.codex.model // empty' .wazir/state/config.json 2>/dev/null)\n   419→CODEX_MODEL=${CODEX_MODEL:-gpt-5.4}\n   420→```\n   421→\n   422→### Artifact Review (specs, plans, designs via stdin)\n   423→\n   424→Use this template with `codex exec` for non-code artifacts piped via stdin:\n   425→\n   426→```bash\n   427→cat <artifact_path> | codex exec -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" \\\n   428→  \"You are reviewing a [ARTIFACT_TYPE] for the Wazir engineering OS.\n   429→Focus on [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   430→Rules: cite specific sections, be actionable, say CLEAN if no issues.\n   431→Do NOT load or invoke any skills. Do NOT read the codebase.\n   432→Review ONLY the content provided via stdin.\"\n   433→```\n   434→\n   435→Replace `[ARTIFACT_TYPE]` with: `specification`, `implementation plan`, `design document`, `research brief`, or `clarification`.\n   436→Replace `[DIMENSION]` and `[dimension description]` with the current review pass dimension from the relevant dimension set above.\n   437→\n   438→### Code Review (diffs via --uncommitted or --base)\n   439→\n   440→Use this template with `codex review` for code changes:\n   441→\n   442→```bash\n   443→codex review -c model=\"$CODEX_MODEL\" --uncommitted --title \"Task NNN: <summary>\" \\\n   444→  \"Review the code changes for [DIMENSION]: [dimension description].\n   445→Check against acceptance criteria: [criteria].\n   446→Flag: correctness issues, missing tests, unwired paths, drift from spec.\n   447→Do NOT load or invoke any skills.\"\n   448→```\n   449→\n   450→For committed changes, replace `--uncommitted` with `--base <sha>`.\n   451→Replace `[DIMENSION]`, `[dimension description]`, and `[criteria]` with the task-specific values from the execution plan and spec.\n   452→\n   453→---\n   454→\n   455→## Codex Output Context Protection\n   456→\n   457→Codex CLI output includes internal traces (file reads, tool calls, reasoning) that are NOT useful for the review — only the final findings matter. To prevent context flooding:\n   458→\n   459→### Tee + Extract Pattern\n   460→\n   461→1. **Always tee** Codex output to a file:\n   462→   ```bash\n   463→   codex exec ... 2>&1 | tee .wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\n   464→   ```\n   465→\n   466→2. **Extract findings** after the last `codex` marker using `execute_file`:\n   467→   ```bash\n   468→   # If context-mode available (has_execute_file: true):\n   469→   mcp__plugin_context-mode_context-mode__execute_file(\n   470→     path: \".wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-review-pass-<N>.md\",\n   471→     language: \"shell\",\n   472→     code: \"tac $FILE | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\"\n   473→   )\n   474→   ```\n   475→\n   476→3. **Present extracted findings only** — the raw trace stays in the file for debugging but never enters the main context window.\n   477→\n   478→### Fallback (no context-mode)\n   479→\n   480→If `context_mode.has_execute_file` is false, extract using shell directly:\n   481→\n   482→```bash\n   483→tac <file> | sed '/^codex$/q' | tac | tail -n +2\n   484→```\n   485→\n   486→This reverses the file, finds the first (= last original) `codex` marker, reverses back, and skips the marker line.\n   487→\n   488→**If no marker found:** fail closed\n   489→\n   490→---\n   491→\n   492→## Phase Scoring: First vs Final Artifact Comparison\n   493→\n   494→At the start of each review loop (pass 1), score the artifact on its phase's canonical dimension set (1-10 per dimension). At the end of the loop (final pass), score again using the **same canonical dimensions**. Present the delta in the end-of-phase report.\n   495→\n   496→### Canonical Dimension Sets Per Phase\n   497→\n   498→These are the fixed rubrics — no ad-hoc dimension selection:\n   499→\n   500→| Phase | Canonical Dimensions |\n   501→|-------|---------------------|\n   502→| research-review | Coverage, Source quality, Relevance, Gaps identified, Actionability |\n   503→| clarification-review / spec-challenge | Completeness, Testability, Ambiguity, Assumptions, Scope creep |\n   504→| design-review | Spec coverage, Design-spec consistency, Accessibility, Visual consistency, Exported-code fidelity |\n   505→| plan-review | Completeness, Testability, Task granularity, Dependency correctness, Phase structure, File coverage, Estimation accuracy, Input coverage |\n   506→| task-review | Correctness, Tests, Wiring, Drift, Quality |\n   507→| final | Correctness, Completeness, Wiring, Verification, Drift, Quality, Documentation, Intent Alignment, Scope Coverage |\n   508→\n   509→### Scoring Rules\n   510→\n   511→1. Initial and final scores MUST use the **same dimension set** — the delta is only meaningful on the same rubric.\n   512→2. The reviewer records which dimension set was used in each pass file.\n   513→3. Delta format: `Dimension: X/10 → Y/10 (+Z)`.\n   514→\n   515→### Quality Delta Report Section\n   516→\n   517→The end-of-phase report (see \"End-of-Phase Report\" below) includes a **Quality Delta** section:\n   518→\n   519→```markdown\n   520→## Quality Delta\n   521→\n   522→| Dimension | Initial | Final | Delta |\n   523→|-----------|---------|-------|-------|\n   524→| Completeness | 4/10 | 9/10 | +5 |\n   525→| Testability | 3/10 | 8/10 | +5 |\n   526→| Ambiguity | 5/10 | 9/10 | +4 |\n   527→```\n   528→\n   529→---\n   530→\n   531→## End-of-Phase Report\n   532→\n   533→Every phase exit produces a report saved to `.wazir/runs/latest/reviews/<phase>-report.md` containing:\n   534→\n   535→1. **Summary** — what the phase produced\n   536→2. **Key Changes** — first-version vs final-version highlights (not full diff — what improved)\n   537→3. **Quality Delta** — per-dimension before/after scores (see Phase Scoring above)\n   538→4. **Findings Log** — per-pass finding counts by severity (e.g., \"Pass 1: 6 findings (3 blocking, 2 warning, 1 note). Pass 7: 0 findings. All resolved.\")\n   539→5. **Usage** — token usage from `wazir capture usage` (runs before report generation)\n   540→6. **Context Savings** — context-mode stats if available, omit section if not\n   541→7. **Time Spent** — wall-clock elapsed time from phase start to end — log \"codex marker not found in output, cannot extract findings\" and present a warning to the user with 0 findings extracted. The raw file is preserved for manual review. Do NOT fall back to `tail` or any best-effort extraction that could leak traces into context.\n   542→"}]},"uuid":"0b78076d-bc3b-4aa7-828e-59094bfda9ac","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:35:29.755Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"cb267bcf-421b-4d2f-83c9-aa7c0e9503d2","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"0b78076d-bc3b-4aa7-828e-59094bfda9ac","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0178AgZGR4gx82Sc687Xjvhz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow let me check the existing escalation and phase failure patterns in Wazir."}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":14085,"cache_read_input_tokens":25836,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":14085,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERNSKEvFYPzaKeX4NhR","type":"assistant","uuid":"32f72224-f8bf-4824-9a8b-cfda2c2b0fc9","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:02.170Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"32f72224-f8bf-4824-9a8b-cfda2c2b0fc9","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0178AgZGR4gx82Sc687Xjvhz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01QjuhCFYvnSHi91RUBinFuv","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/skills/executor/SKILL.md","limit":60},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":null,"stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":14085,"cache_read_input_tokens":25836,"cache_creation":{"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":14085,"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0},"output_tokens":1,"service_tier":"standard","inference_geo":"not_available"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERNSKEvFYPzaKeX4NhR","type":"assistant","uuid":"2f5e1f4d-9296-4c51-94e8-fc575d6879c5","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:03.506Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2f5e1f4d-9296-4c51-94e8-fc575d6879c5","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01QjuhCFYvnSHi91RUBinFuv","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01QjuhCFYvnSHi91RUBinFuv","uuid":"4dec3558-dbfc-4d95-87a8-18b72aa29a67","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:03.507Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"4dec3558-dbfc-4d95-87a8-18b72aa29a67","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01QjuhCFYvnSHi91RUBinFuv","toolUseID":"toolu_01QjuhCFYvnSHi91RUBinFuv","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:03.571Z","uuid":"9e577c8d-dbc5-4f05-90c9-2cd57f280b78","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"2f5e1f4d-9296-4c51-94e8-fc575d6879c5","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01QjuhCFYvnSHi91RUBinFuv","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→---\n     2→name: wz:executor\n     3→description: Run the execution phase — implement the approved plan with TDD, quality gates, and verification.\n     4→---\n     5→\n     6→# Executor\n     7→\n     8→## Model Annotation\n     9→When multi-model mode is enabled, the executor phase uses:\n    10→- **Sonnet** for per-task implementation (write-implementation)\n    11→- **Sonnet** for per-task review (task-review)\n    12→- **Sonnet** for test execution (run-tests)\n    13→- **Opus** for orchestration decisions\n    14→\n    15→## Command Routing\n    16→Follow the Canonical Command Matrix in `hooks/routing-matrix.json`.\n    17→- Large commands (test runners, builds, diffs, dependency trees, linting) → context-mode tools\n    18→- Small commands (git status, ls, pwd, wazir CLI) → native Bash\n    19→- If context-mode unavailable, fall back to native Bash with warning\n    20→\n    21→## Codebase Exploration\n    22→1. Query `wazir index search-symbols <query>` first\n    23→2. Use `wazir recall file <path> --tier L1` for targeted reads\n    24→3. Fall back to direct file reads ONLY for files identified by index queries\n    25→4. Maximum 10 direct file reads without a justifying index query\n    26→5. If no index exists: `wazir index build && wazir index summarize --tier all`\n    27→\n    28→Run the Executor phase — implement the approved plan, then verify all claims.\n    29→\n    30→## Phase Prerequisites (Hard Gate)\n    31→\n    32→Before proceeding, verify these artifacts exist. Check each file. If ANY file is missing, **STOP immediately** and report:\n    33→\n    34→> **Cannot start Executor phase: missing prerequisite artifacts.**\n    35→>\n    36→> Missing:\n    37→> - [list missing files]\n    38→>\n    39→> Run `/wazir:clarifier` to produce the missing artifacts.\n    40→\n    41→Required artifacts:\n    42→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/clarification.md`\n    43→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/spec-hardened.md`\n    44→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/design.md`\n    45→- [ ] `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/execution-plan.md`\n    46→\n    47→**This is a hard gate. Do NOT proceed without all artifacts. Do NOT rationalize that the input is \"clear enough\" to skip phases. The existence of detailed input does NOT replace the pipeline's clarification, specification, design, and planning phases.**\n    48→\n    49→**Standalone mode exception:** If `.wazir/runs/latest/` does not exist at all, operate in standalone mode (skip this check).\n    50→\n    51→## Prerequisites\n    52→\n    53→1. Read the execution plan from `.wazir/runs/latest/clarified/execution-plan.md`.\n    54→2. Read `.wazir/state/config.json` for depth settings.\n    55→\n    56→## Pre-Execution Validation\n    57→\n    58→Run these checks before implementing:\n    59→- `wazir validate manifest` — confirm manifest schema is valid\n    60→- `wazir validate hooks` — confirm hook contracts are intact"}]},"uuid":"da3d6bf7-9325-4fa3-b442-aecb9c576f79","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:03.571Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"2f5e1f4d-9296-4c51-94e8-fc575d6879c5","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"da3d6bf7-9325-4fa3-b442-aecb9c576f79","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_0178AgZGR4gx82Sc687Xjvhz","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"tool_use","id":"toolu_01XPPdBt5rUiLJZynZ13VMDy","name":"Read","input":{"file_path":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir/docs/decisions/2026-03-19-deferred-items.md","limit":80},"caller":{"type":"direct"}}],"stop_reason":"tool_use","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":14085,"cache_read_input_tokens":25836,"output_tokens":203,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":14085},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERNSKEvFYPzaKeX4NhR","type":"assistant","uuid":"01043981-6c59-4452-bb4d-a8813b7cb247","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:04.245Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"01043981-6c59-4452-bb4d-a8813b7cb247","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PreToolUse","hookName":"PreToolUse:Read","command":"node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/pretooluse.mjs"},"toolUseID":"toolu_01XPPdBt5rUiLJZynZ13VMDy","parentToolUseID":"toolu_01XPPdBt5rUiLJZynZ13VMDy","uuid":"55ae30bc-1812-4570-853f-bfaae4222c3a","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:04.246Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"55ae30bc-1812-4570-853f-bfaae4222c3a","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"progress","data":{"type":"hook_progress","hookEvent":"PostToolUse","hookName":"PostToolUse:Read","command":"callback"},"parentToolUseID":"toolu_01XPPdBt5rUiLJZynZ13VMDy","toolUseID":"toolu_01XPPdBt5rUiLJZynZ13VMDy","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:04.320Z","uuid":"57bbfd0e-eb3d-4bf8-8453-e3834689922d","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"01043981-6c59-4452-bb4d-a8813b7cb247","isSidechain":true,"promptId":"67fcde4a-7483-4526-a2da-9ae9514890c8","agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","type":"user","message":{"role":"user","content":[{"tool_use_id":"toolu_01XPPdBt5rUiLJZynZ13VMDy","type":"tool_result","content":"     1→# Deferred Work Items — 2026-03-19\n     2→\n     3→Items agreed upon during brainstorming + pipeline session. Each needs discussion before implementation.\n     4→\n     5→---\n     6→\n     7→## PRIORITY: Restructure Pipeline to 4 Main Phases\n     8→\n     9→The current pipeline has too many micro-phases. Restructure into 4 clear phases:\n    10→\n    11→### Phase 1: Init\n    12→- Straightforward setup\n    13→- Read config, check prerequisites, create run directory\n    14→- No questions (depth/intent/teams inferred or defaulted — see items #4, #5)\n    15→- Scan `input/` directory automatically (see item #3)\n    16→\n    17→### Phase 2: Clarifier\n    18→- Everything from reading input to having an implementation plan\n    19→- Includes: research, clarification, spec hardening, brainstorming/design, planning\n    20→- All review loops happen within this phase (research-review, clarification-review, spec-challenge, design-review, plan-review)\n    21→- Output: approved spec + design + execution plan with task specs\n    22→\n    23→### Phase 3: Executor\n    24→- The simplest phase — pure implementation\n    25→- Should work with a lower-quality model (e.g., Sonnet for executor, medium-quality for per-task reviewer)\n    26→- Per-task TDD cycle: write test → implement → review against task spec\n    27→- The per-task reviewer checks implementation against the TASK spec (not input)\n    28→- Should still produce the same quality results with cheaper models\n    29→\n    30→### Phase 4: Final Review\n    31→- Compare implementation against the ORIGINAL INPUT (not the task specs)\n    32→- The executor's per-task reviewer already validated against task specs — that's covered\n    33→- Final reviewer validates: does what we built actually match what the user asked for?\n    34→- Input-to-implementation comparison catches drift that task-level review misses\n    35→- After review: apply learnings (from the run)\n    36→- After review: prepare for next task (compress/archive unneeded files, write handoff)\n    37→- This is where learn + prepare-next phases get folded in\n    38→\n    39→### Key Principle\n    40→- Phase 3 executor reviewer reviews: implementation vs. task spec\n    41→- Phase 4 final reviewer reviews: implementation vs. original user input\n    42→- These are different concerns — task-level correctness vs. intent alignment\n    43→\n    44→### Online Research\n    45→- How MetaGPT structures its pipeline phases (ProductManager → Architect → Engineer → QA) — their phase boundaries and handoff contracts\n    46→- How OpenAI Symphony structures Poll → Dispatch → Resolve → Land — what happens between phases\n    47→- How CrewAI Flows handle phase transitions with routers and conditional branching\n    48→- How GitHub Spec-Kit structures spec → implement → verify — their phase model\n    49→- LangGraph's multi-step agent pipelines — how they define phase boundaries vs. node boundaries\n    50→- How Devin structures its planning → implementation → verification phases\n    51→- How Cursor Agent / Windsurf Cascade structure their internal pipeline phases\n    52→\n    53→---\n    54→\n    55→## 16. One-Command Install + Zero-Config Start\n    56→\n    57→**Goal:** Wazir should be one of the easiest agent frameworks to install and use.\n    58→\n    59→**Current experience (too many steps, one breaks):**\n    60→```bash\n    61→git clone wazir\n    62→npm install\n    63→npx wazir export build   # 4 host exports\n    64→npx wazir init            # interactive arrows — FAILS in Claude Code\n    65→# then learn phases, roles, skills, composition...\n    66→```\n    67→\n    68→**Target experience:**\n    69→```bash\n    70→npx wazir\n    71→```\n    72→\n    73→One command. Everything else is automatic or deferred until needed.\n    74→\n    75→**What `npx wazir` should do:**\n    76→1. Detect host (Claude Code? Codex? Cursor? Gemini?) from environment\n    77→2. Export the right files for that host automatically\n    78→3. Scan the project (language, framework, stack)\n    79→4. Ask \"What do you want to build?\" — one question, no config\n    80→5. Run the full pipeline"}]},"uuid":"d772f7ac-8cfc-4151-bf0e-45e1a11b0871","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:36:04.320Z","sourceToolAssistantUUID":"01043981-6c59-4452-bb4d-a8813b7cb247","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}
+{"parentUuid":"d772f7ac-8cfc-4151-bf0e-45e1a11b0871","isSidechain":true,"agentId":"a8dbadc66cd0d7d5a","message":{"model":"claude-opus-4-6","id":"msg_012vXrNkmZW99CbTrvjNriAB","type":"message","role":"assistant","content":[{"type":"text","text":"\n\nNow I have enough information to synthesize a complete research report. Let me compile everything.\n\n---\n\n## Research Report: Phase Failure and Retry Strategies\n\n### 1. CrewAI — Guardrail Max Retries\n\n**Mechanism:** Tasks have a `guardrail` function that returns `(True, result)` on pass or `(False, \"error message\")` on fail. The `guardrail_max_retries` parameter (default: varies, typically 2-3) controls how many times the agent gets to retry.\n\n**What happens on each retry:** The error string from the `(False, msg)` tuple is injected back into the agent's prompt as feedback. The *same agent* re-executes the *same task* with the error context appended. No model change, no escalation -- just \"try again with this feedback.\"\n\n**What happens after max retries exhausted:** The task enters a terminal failure state. CrewAI raises an error/exception that propagates up to the crew-level error handler. The crew stops. There is no built-in fallback to a different model, no automatic escalation to a human, and no graceful degradation. The caller is responsible for catching the exception and deciding what to do.\n\n**Key takeaway:** CrewAI's retry is purely \"same agent, same model, feedback-enriched re-attempt.\" It is a validation loop, not an escalation chain. After exhaustion, it is a hard stop.\n\nSources:\n- [CrewAI Tasks Documentation](https://docs.crewai.com/en/concepts/tasks)\n- [CrewAI Guardrails Guide (Analytics Vidhya)](https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2025/11/introduction-to-task-guardrails-in-crewai/)\n- [CrewAI Task Guardrails PR #1742](https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI/pull/1742)\n\n---\n\n### 2. LangGraph — Node Retry Policies\n\n**Mechanism:** Nodes can be assigned a `RetryPolicy` with these parameters:\n- `max_attempts` (default: 3, includes the initial attempt)\n- `initial_interval` (seconds between first retry)\n- `backoff_factor` (multiplier per retry, default: 2.0)\n- `max_interval` (ceiling on delay)\n- `jitter` (randomization to avoid thundering herds)\n- `retry_on` (exception type filter -- only retry on specific error types)\n\n**What happens on failure:** By default, when a node throws an exception, the graph **stops immediately**. LangGraph does not silently retry, skip, or recover. If a `RetryPolicy` is attached, the node is retried according to the policy parameters, but only for matching exception types.\n\n**What happens after max attempts exhausted:** The failure is treated as **final**. If the graph has no alternate path, execution halts and the error surfaces. However, LangGraph supports a **conditional-edge fallback pattern**: a routing function checks `state.retry_count` and routes to either the retry node or a fallback node. This is explicitly user-built, not automatic.\n\n**Fallback/escalation pattern (community best practice):**\n1. Add `retry_count` and `error_history` to graph state.\n2. Node increments `retry_count` on failure.\n3. Conditional edge routes: if `retry_count < max`, loop back; else, route to fallback node.\n4. Fallback node can: use a lighter/different model, return cached response, or escalate to human.\n\n**Key takeaway:** LangGraph provides retry primitives but no built-in escalation. Escalation is a graph-structure concern -- you wire it as conditional edges. The pattern of \"retry same node N times, then route to fallback\" is the canonical approach, but the developer builds it.\n\nSources:\n- [LangGraph RetryPolicy Reference](https://reference.langchain.com/python/langgraph/types/RetryPolicy)\n- [LangGraph Error Handling: Retries & Fallback Strategies](https://machinelearningplus.com/gen-ai/langgraph-error-handling-retries-fallback-strategies/)\n- [Best Way to Control Flow After Retries Exhausted (LangChain Forum)](https://forum.langchain.com/t/the-best-way-in-langgraph-to-control-flow-after-retries-exhausted/1574)\n- [Beginner's Guide to Handling Errors in LangGraph](https://dev.to/aiengineering/a-beginners-guide-to-handling-errors-in-langgraph-with-retry-policies-h22)\n\n---\n\n### 3. Temporal — Retry Policies\n\n**Mechanism:** Temporal has the most mature retry system. Activity-level retry policy:\n- `initial_interval`: 1 second (default)\n- `backoff_coefficient`: 2.0 (default) -- exponential backoff\n- `maximum_interval`: 100 * initial_interval (default) -- caps backoff growth\n- `maximum_attempts`: unlimited (default, 0 = infinite)\n- `non_retryable_error_types`: list of error type strings that bypass retry entirely\n\n**Retry interval formula:** `min(initial_interval * backoff_coefficient^retry_number, maximum_interval)`\n\n**Non-retryable errors (critical concept):** When an Activity raises an `ApplicationError` whose type matches `non_retryable_error_types`, it fails immediately with no retries. This is the key design insight: **not all errors are worth retrying**. A syntax error in a prompt will fail the same way every time. A rate-limit 429 is transient and worth retrying.\n\n**Activity vs. Workflow retries:** By default, Temporal retries **Activities** (the units of work) but **not Workflows** (the orchestration). Workflows are expected to be deterministic; if a workflow fails, it is restarted from scratch, not retried mid-execution.\n\n**What happens after max attempts:** The Activity fails permanently. The Workflow receives an `ActivityError` and can handle it: catch and run a different Activity, compensate, or fail the entire Workflow.\n\n**Key takeaway:** Temporal separates the retry concern (Activity-level, automatic, configurable) from the escalation concern (Workflow-level, programmatic). The `non_retryable_error_types` concept is essential -- it prevents wasting retries on deterministic failures.\n\nSources:\n- [Temporal Retry Policies Documentation](https://docs.temporal.io/encyclopedia/retry-policies)\n- [Temporal Blog: Failure Handling in Practice](https://temporal.io/blog/failure-handling-in-practice)\n- [Error Retries in Temporal Workflow (Mincong Huang)](https://mincong.io/en/error-retries-in-temporal/)\n- [Temporal Python SDK: Failure Detection](https://docs.temporal.io/develop/python/failure-detection)\n\n---\n\n### 4. Symphony (OpenAI) — RetryQueued State\n\n**Mechanism:** Symphony's orchestrator manages issue lifecycle with these states:\n`Unclaimed -> Claimed -> Running -> {Succeeded | RetryQueued | Failed | TimedOut | Stalled | Released}`\n\n**RetryQueued:** When a worker (agent) fails on an issue, the issue moves to `RetryQueued`. The orchestrator schedules a retry with exponential backoff: `delay = min(10000ms * 2^(attempt-1), max_backoff_ms)`. Default `max_backoff_ms` = 300,000ms (5 minutes). Produces the sequence: 10s, 20s, 40s, 80s, 160s, 300s, 300s...\n\n**max_dispatch_attempts:** After exceeding this threshold, the issue transitions to `Released` -- a terminal state. The claim is removed and the issue is released back to the tracker for **human attention**. Symphony does not auto-escalate to a different model or a different agent -- it returns the work to the human queue.\n\n**Key takeaway:** Symphony treats the agent as a worker that can fail and be retried with backoff, but its terminal escalation path is always \"release back to human.\" There is no model escalation. The distinct terminal states (Failed vs TimedOut vs Stalled) allow the human to understand *why* the work was released.\n\nSources:\n- [Symphony SPEC.md](https://github.com/openai/symphony/blob/main/SPEC.md)\n- [OpenAI Symphony GitHub Repository](https://github.com/openai/symphony)\n- [Symphony Deep Dive (sjramblings)](https://sjramblings.io/openai-symphony-autonomous-agent-orchestration/)\n\n---\n\n### 5. Cross-Framework Synthesis\n\n| Dimension | CrewAI | LangGraph | Temporal | Symphony |\n|-----------|--------|-----------|----------|----------|\n| **Retry unit** | Task (agent re-run) | Node (function re-call) | Activity (work unit) | Issue (dispatch) |\n| **Feedback injection** | Error string -> agent prompt | Error in state object | N/A (same input) | N/A (fresh dispatch) |\n| **Backoff** | None (immediate) | Configurable exponential | Configurable exponential | Fixed exponential (10s base) |\n| **Max retries** | `guardrail_max_retries` | `max_attempts` | `maximum_attempts` | `max_dispatch_attempts` |\n| **Non-retryable errors** | No concept | `retry_on` filter | `non_retryable_error_types` | No concept |\n| **Model escalation** | None | User-built via graph | N/A (not LLM-specific) | None |\n| **Terminal action** | Exception raised | Graph halts or fallback node | Activity error to Workflow | Released to human |\n| **State preservation** | Agent memory (limited) | Graph state (full) | Workflow history (durable) | Issue metadata |\n\n---\n\n### 6. Recommended Strategy for Wazir's Phase Controller\n\nBased on the research, here is a concrete retry and escalation strategy for Wazir, synthesized from the strongest ideas in each framework.\n\n#### 6.1 Error Classification (from Temporal)\n\nNot all failures deserve retries. Classify errors before deciding:\n\n| Error Class | Examples | Retry? |\n|-------------|----------|--------|\n| **Transient** | API rate limit, network timeout, Codex CLI exit non-zero | Yes, with backoff |\n| **Quality** | Guardrail rejects output (bad structure, missing sections, fails validation) | Yes, with feedback injection |\n| **Deterministic** | Missing prerequisite artifact, invalid config, model refuses task | No -- escalate immediately |\n| **Resource** | Context window exceeded, token budget exhausted | No -- escalate with model change |\n\n#### 6.2 Three-Tier Retry Ladder\n\n```\nTier 1: Same model, feedback-enriched retry (CrewAI pattern)\n   |  Inject guardrail error + prior output into the subagent prompt\n   |  Max: 2 retries (3 total attempts)\n   |  No backoff needed (LLM calls are not rate-limited internally)\n   |\n   v  [All 3 attempts failed]\n   \nTier 2: Model escalation (novel, from Wazir's existing model-router)\n   |  Escalate one tier: haiku->sonnet->opus\n   |  Re-spawn subagent with upgraded model + accumulated error history\n   |  Max: 1 escalation step (e.g., sonnet->opus, not haiku->sonnet->opus)\n   |  Include in prompt: \"Previous model failed N times. Errors: [...]\"\n   |\n   v  [Escalated model also failed]\n   \nTier 3: Human escalation (Symphony pattern)\n   |  Present to user with structured options:\n   |    a) Provide guidance and retry (user injects context)\n   |    b) Approve partial output with known issues\n   |    c) Skip this phase/task\n   |    d) Abort the run\n   |  Save full error history to .wazir/runs/latest/errors/<phase>-failures.md\n```\n\n#### 6.3 State Preservation Across Retries (from LangGraph)\n\nPersist in the run state DB (SQLite) between retry attempts:\n\n```yaml\nretry_state:\n  phase: \"clarifier.specify\"\n  attempt: 2\n  tier: 1                          # which tier we're on\n  model_used: \"sonnet\"\n  error_history:\n    - attempt: 1\n      model: \"sonnet\"\n      error_class: \"quality\"\n      guardrail_errors: [\"Missing acceptance criteria in sections 3, 5\"]\n      output_hash: \"abc123\"        # hash of rejected output for dedup\n      timestamp: \"2026-03-20T14:32:00Z\"\n  partial_output: \"path/to/rejected-artifact.md\"   # preserved, not discarded\n  escalation_log: []\n```\n\n**Why preserve rejected output:** The escalated model or human may be able to salvage partial work rather than starting from scratch. Store it at `.wazir/runs/latest/artifacts/<phase>-attempt-<N>-rejected.md`.\n\n#### 6.4 Configuration Surface\n\nAdd to `run-config.yaml` under a new `retry_policy` section:\n\n```yaml\nretry_policy:\n  max_same_model_retries: 2        # Tier 1 attempts (beyond initial)\n  enable_model_escalation: true    # Tier 2\n  escalation_map:                  # which model to escalate to\n    haiku: sonnet\n    sonnet: opus\n    opus: opus                     # opus is ceiling -- go to Tier 3\n  non_retryable_errors:            # Temporal-inspired\n    - \"missing_prerequisite\"\n    - \"invalid_config\"\n    - \"context_window_exceeded\"\n  human_escalation_options:        # what to present at Tier 3\n    - \"provide-guidance-retry\"\n    - \"approve-with-issues\"\n    - \"skip-phase\"\n    - \"abort-run\"\n```\n\n#### 6.5 Decision Flow (Pseudocode)\n\n```\nexecute_phase(phase, config):\n  tier = 1\n  model = get_model_for_task(phase.task_type, config)\n  error_history = []\n\n  for attempt in 1..max_same_model_retries + 1:\n    output = spawn_subagent(phase, model, error_history)\n    validation = run_guardrails(output, phase.guardrails)\n    \n    if validation.passed:\n      return output\n    \n    error = classify_error(validation)\n    \n    if error.class in non_retryable_errors:\n      return escalate_to_human(phase, error, error_history)\n    \n    if error.class == \"resource\" and model != \"opus\":\n      # Skip remaining Tier 1 retries, go to Tier 2\n      break\n    \n    error_history.append({ attempt, model, error, output_hash })\n    save_rejected_artifact(phase, attempt, output)\n  \n  # --- Tier 2: Model escalation ---\n  if config.enable_model_escalation:\n    escalated_model = config.escalation_map[model]\n    if escalated_model != model:\n      tier = 2\n      output = spawn_subagent(phase, escalated_model, error_history)\n      validation = run_guardrails(output, phase.guardrails)\n      \n      if validation.passed:\n        log_escalation_success(phase, model, escalated_model)\n        return output\n      \n      error_history.append({ attempt: \"escalated\", model: escalated_model, error })\n  \n  # --- Tier 3: Human escalation ---\n  return escalate_to_human(phase, error_history, options=config.human_escalation_options)\n```\n\n#### 6.6 Integration Points with Existing Wazir\n\n| Existing mechanism | How retry/escalation integrates |\n|---|---|\n| **model-router.js** | `escalation_map` extends the routing table with a fallback chain. `getModelForTask` gets a companion `getEscalatedModel(currentModel, config)` |\n| **review-loop-pattern** | Loop cap (exit 43) triggers Tier 3 directly -- review loops already have their own internal retry via pass counts. The retry ladder applies to *phase-level* failures, not individual review passes |\n| **subagent-driven-development** | \"If subagent fails task\" section currently says \"dispatch fix subagent.\" The retry ladder formalizes this: first re-dispatch same model with errors, then escalate model, then escalate to human |\n| **capture/store.js (SQLite)** | `retry_state` table stores attempt history, enabling resume after crash |\n| **workflow_policy.loop_cap** | Loop cap is the ceiling on review passes; `max_same_model_retries` is the ceiling on phase-level re-attempts. They are orthogonal |\n\n#### 6.7 Key Design Decisions\n\n1. **Max 2 same-model retries (3 total attempts)** -- research consensus across all frameworks. CrewAI defaults to small numbers. LangGraph defaults to 3. More than 3 attempts at the same tier wastes tokens on deterministic failures.\n\n2. **Single escalation step, not a chain** -- escalating haiku->sonnet->opus (3 hops) is wasteful. If sonnet fails a quality guardrail 3 times, go straight to opus. If opus fails, go to human. One hop max.\n\n3. **No backoff for LLM retries** -- unlike Temporal/Symphony where backoff handles rate limits, LLM guardrail failures are not transient. Backoff only applies to transient errors (API 429s), which should be handled at the HTTP client level, not the phase controller.\n\n4. **Preserve rejected output** -- every framework discards failed output. This is wasteful for LLM tasks where partial output has value. The escalated model or human can reference it.\n\n5. **Error classification is mandatory** -- Temporal's `non_retryable_error_types` is the single most important pattern. Without it, you burn 3+ retries on a missing config file that will never self-heal."}],"stop_reason":"end_turn","stop_sequence":null,"usage":{"input_tokens":3,"cache_creation_input_tokens":2393,"cache_read_input_tokens":39921,"output_tokens":4436,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":2393},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"}},"requestId":"req_011CZERWrT2hKp4aZcUv9isE","type":"assistant","uuid":"f401dae2-f762-4bad-858a-d647ff248b1d","timestamp":"2026-03-20T13:39:30.578Z","userType":"external","entrypoint":"cli","cwd":"/Users/mohamedabdallah/Work/Wazir","sessionId":"0c5a9bfa-6816-42b1-a97d-37ae7dad26c5","version":"2.1.80","gitBranch":"feat/remaining-6-fixes","slug":"mighty-wondering-giraffe"}