@vellumai/assistant 0.6.4 → 0.6.5

package/src/permissions/approval-policy.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,948 @@
+import { describe, expect, test } from "bun:test";
+
+import type { ApprovalContext, ApprovalDecision } from "./approval-policy.js";
+import { DefaultApprovalPolicy, resolveThreshold } from "./approval-policy.js";
+import type { TrustRule } from "./types.js";
+import { RiskLevel } from "./types.js";
+
+// ── Helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const policy = new DefaultApprovalPolicy();
+
+function makeRule(
+  overrides: Partial<TrustRule> & { decision: TrustRule["decision"] },
+): TrustRule {
+  return {
+    id: "test-rule",
+    tool: "bash",
+    pattern: "test-pattern",
+    priority: 100,
+    createdAt: Date.now(),
+    ...overrides,
+  };
+}
+
+function makeContext(overrides: Partial<ApprovalContext>): ApprovalContext {
+  return {
+    riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+    toolName: "bash",
+    permissionsMode: "workspace",
+    isContainerized: false,
+    isWorkspaceScoped: false,
+    ...overrides,
+  };
+}
+
+function evaluate(overrides: Partial<ApprovalContext>): ApprovalDecision {
+  return policy.evaluate(makeContext(overrides));
+}
+
+// ── Deny rule at each risk level ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("deny rule", () => {
+  const denyRule = makeRule({ decision: "deny" });
+
+  test("deny at Low risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      matchedRule: denyRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("deny");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("deny rule");
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(denyRule);
+  });
+
+  test("deny at Medium risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      matchedRule: denyRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("deny");
+  });
+
+  test("deny at High risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      matchedRule: denyRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("deny");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── Ask rule at each risk level ──────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("ask rule", () => {
+  const askRule = makeRule({ decision: "ask" });
+
+  test("ask at Low risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({ riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low, matchedRule: askRule });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("ask rule");
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(askRule);
+  });
+
+  test("ask at Medium risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      matchedRule: askRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+  });
+
+  test("ask at High risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      matchedRule: askRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── Allow rule at each risk level ────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("allow rule", () => {
+  const allowRule = makeRule({ decision: "allow" });
+
+  test("allow at Low risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Matched trust rule");
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(allowRule);
+  });
+
+  test("allow at Medium risk", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Matched trust rule");
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(allowRule);
+  });
+
+  test("allow at High risk — non-containerized bash → prompt, no matchedRule in decision", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+      isContainerized: false,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("high risk");
+    // Decision is driven by risk-based fallback, not the rule
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
+  test("allow at High risk — containerized bash → allow (auto-allow), matchedRule present", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+      isContainerized: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("auto-allow-high-risk");
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(allowRule);
+  });
+
+  test("allow at High risk — non-bash tool, containerized → prompt, no matchedRule in decision", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "file_write",
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+      isContainerized: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("high risk");
+    // Decision is driven by risk-based fallback, not the rule
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
+  test("allow at High risk — non-bash tool, non-containerized → prompt, no matchedRule in decision", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "file_write",
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+      isContainerized: false,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("high risk");
+    // Decision is driven by risk-based fallback, not the rule
+    expect(result.matchedRule).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+});
+
+// ── No rule: third-party skill tool ──────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("no rule — third-party skill tool", () => {
+  test("skill origin, not bundled → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "custom_tool",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: false,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Skill tool");
+  });
+
+  test("skill origin, not bundled, Medium risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      toolName: "custom_tool",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: false,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Skill tool");
+  });
+
+  test("no tool origin but hasManifestOverride → prompt (unregistered skill tool)", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "unknown_tool",
+      hasManifestOverride: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Skill tool");
+  });
+
+  test("skill origin, bundled → falls through (not third-party)", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bundled_tool",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: true,
+    });
+    // Bundled skill + Low risk + no rule → handled by step 9 or 11
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── No rule: strict mode ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("no rule — strict mode", () => {
+  test("strict mode, Low risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "file_read",
+      permissionsMode: "strict",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Strict mode");
+  });
+
+  test("strict mode, Medium risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      toolName: "file_read",
+      permissionsMode: "strict",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Strict mode");
+  });
+
+  test("strict mode, High risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "file_read",
+      permissionsMode: "strict",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Strict mode");
+  });
+
+  test("strict mode blocks bundled skill tools without explicit rule", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bundled_tool",
+      permissionsMode: "strict",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Strict mode");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── No rule: workspace mode ──────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("no rule — workspace mode", () => {
+  test("workspace mode, Low risk, workspace-scoped → allow", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "file_read",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Workspace mode");
+  });
+
+  test("workspace mode, Low risk, NOT workspace-scoped → falls through", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "file_read",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isWorkspaceScoped: false,
+    });
+    // Falls through to risk-based: Low → allow (within default "low" threshold)
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("low risk");
+  });
+
+  test("workspace mode, Medium risk → falls through to risk-based prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      toolName: "file_write",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("medium risk");
+  });
+
+  test("workspace mode, bash, NOT containerized, Low risk, workspace-scoped → falls through (no auto-allow for host bash)", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isContainerized: false,
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+    });
+    // Non-containerized bash falls through the workspace check.
+    // Then hits risk-based: Low → allow (within default "low" threshold)
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("low risk");
+  });
+
+  test("workspace mode, bash, containerized, Low risk, workspace-scoped → allow via workspace mode", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isContainerized: true,
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Workspace mode");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── No rule: bundled skill tool ──────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("no rule — bundled skill tool", () => {
+  test("bundled skill, Low risk → allow", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bundled_tool",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Bundled skill");
+  });
+
+  test("bundled skill, Medium risk → prompt (only Low auto-allows)", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      toolName: "bundled_tool",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("medium risk");
+  });
+
+  test("bundled skill, High risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "bundled_tool",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("high risk");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── Risk-based fallback ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("risk-based fallback (no rule, no special case)", () => {
+  test("High risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "some_tool",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("high risk");
+  });
+
+  test("Low risk → allow", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "some_tool",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("low risk");
+  });
+
+  test("Medium risk → prompt", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+      toolName: "some_tool",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("medium risk");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── Edge cases and combined scenarios ────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("edge cases", () => {
+  test("deny rule takes precedence over allow-everything else", () => {
+    const denyRule = makeRule({ decision: "deny" });
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      matchedRule: denyRule,
+      isContainerized: true,
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("deny");
+  });
+
+  test("ask rule takes precedence over allow-for-low", () => {
+    const askRule = makeRule({ decision: "ask" });
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      matchedRule: askRule,
+      isContainerized: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+  });
+
+  test("allow rule High risk falls through to prompt even with workspace mode", () => {
+    const allowRule = makeRule({ decision: "allow" });
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+      toolName: "file_write",
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isContainerized: false,
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+    });
+    // Allow rule + High risk + non-bash → falls through to risk-based: High → prompt
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("high risk");
+  });
+
+  test("reason includes the matched rule pattern", () => {
+    const rule = makeRule({ decision: "allow", pattern: "git status" });
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      matchedRule: rule,
+    });
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("git status");
+  });
+
+  test("deny reason includes the matched rule pattern", () => {
+    const rule = makeRule({ decision: "deny", pattern: "rm -rf /" });
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      matchedRule: rule,
+    });
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("rm -rf /");
+  });
+
+  test("strict mode with matched allow rule at Low risk → allow (rule takes precedence)", () => {
+    const allowRule = makeRule({ decision: "allow" });
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "file_read",
+      matchedRule: allowRule,
+      permissionsMode: "strict",
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+  });
+
+  test("workspace mode non-containerized bash, Low risk, workspace-scoped → low risk allow (not workspace allow)", () => {
+    // This is the subtle bash host exception. The workspace mode check
+    // specifically skips bash when not containerized, so it falls through
+    // to the risk-based path where Low risk still auto-allows.
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "bash",
+      permissionsMode: "workspace",
+      isContainerized: false,
+      isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    // The reason should be "low risk" not "Workspace mode" — the workspace
+    // auto-allow was bypassed because bash is on the host.
+    expect(result.reason).not.toContain("Workspace mode");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("low risk");
+  });
+
+  test("hasManifestOverride with toolOrigin set to skill — third-party check triggers on origin", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "manifest_tool",
+      toolOrigin: "skill",
+      isSkillBundled: false,
+      hasManifestOverride: true,
+    });
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("Skill tool");
+  });
+
+  test("hasManifestOverride with toolOrigin set to builtin — falls through (not a skill)", () => {
+    const result = evaluate({
+      riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+      toolName: "manifest_tool",
+      toolOrigin: "builtin",
+      hasManifestOverride: true,
+    });
+    // toolOrigin is "builtin", so the third-party skill check doesn't trigger.
+    // The hasManifestOverride check requires !toolOrigin, but toolOrigin is set.
+    // Falls through to risk-based: Low → allow (within default "low" threshold).
+    expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+    expect(result.reason).toContain("low risk");
+  });
+});
+
+// ── autoApproveUpTo threshold ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("autoApproveUpTo threshold", () => {
+  describe('autoApproveUpTo: "none" — everything prompts', () => {
+    test("Low risk → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("Medium risk → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("High risk → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('autoApproveUpTo: "low" — default, matches existing behavior', () => {
+    test("Low risk → allow", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "low",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("within auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("Medium risk → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "low",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("High risk → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "low",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('autoApproveUpTo: "medium" — Low and Medium auto-allow', () => {
+    test("Low risk → allow", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("within auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("Medium risk → allow", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("within auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("High risk → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("threshold interacts correctly with rule-based decisions", () => {
+    test("deny rule still denies regardless of threshold", () => {
+      const denyRule = makeRule({ decision: "deny" });
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "bash",
+        matchedRule: denyRule,
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("deny");
+      expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(denyRule);
+    });
+
+    test("ask rule still prompts regardless of threshold", () => {
+      const askRule = makeRule({ decision: "ask" });
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "bash",
+        matchedRule: askRule,
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(askRule);
+    });
+
+    test("allow rule still allows non-High regardless of threshold", () => {
+      const allowRule = makeRule({ decision: "allow" });
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+        toolName: "file_write",
+        matchedRule: allowRule,
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.matchedRule).toBe(allowRule);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("threshold interacts correctly with strict mode", () => {
+    test("strict mode still prompts even with medium threshold", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "file_read",
+        permissionsMode: "strict",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("Strict mode");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("threshold interacts correctly with workspace mode", () => {
+    test("workspace mode workspace-scoped Low still allows via workspace path (before threshold)", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "file_read",
+        permissionsMode: "workspace",
+        isWorkspaceScoped: true,
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      // Workspace mode auto-allow fires before the threshold fallback
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("Workspace mode");
+    });
+
+    test("workspace mode non-workspace-scoped Low with none threshold → prompt", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "file_read",
+        permissionsMode: "workspace",
+        isWorkspaceScoped: false,
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      // Falls through workspace check (not workspace-scoped), then threshold
+      // "none" means Low risk is above threshold → prompt
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("threshold defaults to low when omitted", () => {
+    test("omitted autoApproveUpTo behaves as low", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        // autoApproveUpTo not set
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("within auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+// ── resolveThreshold ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+describe("resolveThreshold", () => {
+  describe("scalar form", () => {
+    test("returns scalar for conversation context", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("low", "conversation")).toBe("low");
+    });
+
+    test("returns scalar for background context", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("medium", "background")).toBe("medium");
+    });
+
+    test("returns scalar for headless context", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("none", "headless")).toBe("none");
+    });
+
+    test("returns scalar when executionContext is omitted", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("low")).toBe("low");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("object form", () => {
+    const perContext = {
+      conversation: "low" as const,
+      background: "medium" as const,
+      headless: "none" as const,
+    };
+
+    test("returns conversation threshold for conversation context", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold(perContext, "conversation")).toBe("low");
+    });
+
+    test("returns background threshold for background context", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold(perContext, "background")).toBe("medium");
+    });
+
+    test("returns headless threshold for headless context", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold(perContext, "headless")).toBe("none");
+    });
+
+    test("defaults to conversation when executionContext is omitted", () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold(perContext)).toBe("low");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("per-context thresholds in policy evaluation", () => {
+    test("conversation context with low threshold prompts medium risk", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "low",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+    });
+
+    test("background context with medium threshold allows medium risk", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Medium,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("allow");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("within auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("headless context with none threshold prompts low risk", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.Low,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "none",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+
+    test("background context with medium threshold prompts high risk", () => {
+      const result = evaluate({
+        riskLevel: RiskLevel.High,
+        toolName: "some_tool",
+        autoApproveUpTo: "medium",
+      });
+      expect(result.decision).toBe("prompt");
+      expect(result.reason).toContain("above auto-approve threshold");
+    });
+  });
+});
+
+// ── Guardian threshold-based auto-approve ────────────────────────────────────
+// These tests verify the ordinal comparison used in permission-checker.ts
+// to decide whether a guardian non-interactive session should auto-approve.
+// The comparison logic: riskOrdinal <= thresholdOrdinal.
+
+describe("guardian threshold-based auto-approve (ordinal comparison)", () => {
+  // Helper that mirrors the ordinal comparison from permission-checker.ts.
+  // This is the logic that replaces the old `riskLevel !== RiskLevel.High` check.
+  function isWithinThreshold(
+    riskLevel: RiskLevel,
+    bgThreshold: "none" | "low" | "medium",
+  ): boolean {
+    const thresholdOrdinal: Record<string, number> = {
+      none: -1,
+      low: 0,
+      medium: 1,
+    };
+    const riskOrdinal: Record<string, number> = {
+      [RiskLevel.Low]: 0,
+      [RiskLevel.Medium]: 1,
+      [RiskLevel.High]: 2,
+    };
+    return (
+      (riskOrdinal[riskLevel] ?? 2) <= (thresholdOrdinal[bgThreshold] ?? 0)
+    );
+  }
+
+  describe('default config (background: "medium") — behavioral parity with old riskLevel !== High', () => {
+    test("Low risk → within threshold (auto-approve)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "medium", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(bgThreshold).toBe("medium");
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Low, bgThreshold)).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("Medium risk → within threshold (auto-approve)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "medium", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Medium, bgThreshold)).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("High risk → above threshold (prompt)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "medium", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.High, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('tighter config (background: "low") — only Low auto-approves', () => {
+    test("Low risk → within threshold", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "low", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(bgThreshold).toBe("low");
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Low, bgThreshold)).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("Medium risk → above threshold (prompt)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "low", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Medium, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("High risk → above threshold (prompt)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "low", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.High, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('strictest config (background: "none") — nothing auto-approves', () => {
+    test("Low risk → above threshold (prompt)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "none", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(bgThreshold).toBe("none");
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Low, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("Medium risk → above threshold (prompt)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "none", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Medium, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("High risk → above threshold (prompt)", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(
+        { conversation: "low", background: "none", headless: "none" },
+        "background",
+      );
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.High, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("scalar config form resolves correctly for background context", () => {
+    test('scalar "medium" → background resolves to medium', () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("medium", "background")).toBe("medium");
+    });
+
+    test('scalar "low" → background resolves to low', () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("low", "background")).toBe("low");
+    });
+
+    test('scalar "none" → background resolves to none', () => {
+      expect(resolveThreshold("none", "background")).toBe("none");
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe("default (undefined) resolves per-context defaults", () => {
+    test("undefined config → medium threshold for background", () => {
+      const bgThreshold = resolveThreshold(undefined, "background");
+      expect(bgThreshold).toBe("medium");
+      // Low and Medium risk are within threshold, High is not
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Low, bgThreshold)).toBe(true);
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.Medium, bgThreshold)).toBe(true);
+      expect(isWithinThreshold(RiskLevel.High, bgThreshold)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("undefined config → low threshold for conversation", () => {
+      const convThreshold = resolveThreshold(undefined, "conversation");
+      expect(convThreshold).toBe("low");
+    });
+
+    test("undefined config → none threshold for headless", () => {
+      const hlThreshold = resolveThreshold(undefined, "headless");
+      expect(hlThreshold).toBe("none");
+    });
+
+    test("undefined config + no context → low (conversation default)", () => {
+      const threshold = resolveThreshold(undefined);
+      expect(threshold).toBe("low");
+    });
+  });
+});