@tscircuit/schematic-trace-solver 0.0.192 → 0.0.194

package/tests/repros/repro-core-vertical-passive-ground-label-overlap.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+import { expect, test } from "bun:test"
+import { SchematicTracePipelineSolver } from "lib/solvers/SchematicTracePipelineSolver/SchematicTracePipelineSolver"
+import type { InputProblem } from "lib/types/InputProblem"
+import { pathIntersectsRenderedLabel } from "lib/utils/pathIntersectsRenderedLabel"
+import "tests/fixtures/matcher"
+import inputProblem from "./assets/repro-core-vertical-passive-ground-label-overlap.input.json"
+
+// Captured via solver:started from @tscircuit/core repro187. Symbol names and
+// display text were added for a readable snapshot; routing geometry is intact.
+test("VREF trace overlaps a vertical passive GND label", async () => {
+  const solver = new SchematicTracePipelineSolver(
+    inputProblem as unknown as InputProblem,
+    { hideRatsNet: true },
+  )
+
+  solver.solve()
+
+  expect(solver.solved).toBe(true)
+  const { traces, netLabelPlacements } =
+    solver.netLabelToTraceSolver!.getOutput()
+  const groundLabel = netLabelPlacements.find(
+    (label) =>
+      label.netId === "GND" && label.pinIds.includes("schematic_port_7"),
+  )!
+  const vrefTrace = traces.find(
+    (trace) =>
+      trace.pinIds.includes("schematic_port_6") &&
+      trace.pinIds.includes("schematic_port_8"),
+  )!
+
+  expect(groundLabel).toBeDefined()
+  expect(vrefTrace).toBeDefined()
+  expect(vrefTrace.globalConnNetId).not.toBe(groundLabel.globalConnNetId)
+  // Current bug: a different-net trace crosses the rendered GND terminal.
+  expect(pathIntersectsRenderedLabel(vrefTrace.tracePath, groundLabel)).toBe(
+    true,
+  )
+  await expect(solver).toMatchSolverSnapshot(import.meta.path)
+})