@torrent-tv/proxy 2.89.6 → 2.89.7

package/test/encode-plan.test.js

@@ -1,545 +1,545 @@
-/**
- * @file How many encoders there should be, and where.
- *
- * Every case here is one the code used to get wrong for a reason recorded in
- * `research/encoder-layer-2026-09-04.md`: a run placed at a viewer's position
- * rather than at the first thing missing, a run with no end, and nothing that
- * stops a run which has caught up with material already made.
- */
-
-import test from "node:test";
-import assert from "node:assert/strict";
-import { CoverageMap } from "../services/encode/CoverageMap.js";
-import { endOfRun } from "../services/encode/EncodeRun.js";
-import { firstUnmetWant, planEncoders } from "../services/encode/EncodePlan.js";
-import { contentionPenalty, penaltiesFrom } from "../services/encode/contention.js";
-
-// WHAT A SECOND ENCODER COSTS THE FIRST — measured, never a formula.
-//
-// Addon host, 2026-09-03: 854x480 through libx264 `ultrafast` ran at 7.12x with
-// the machine to itself, and at 4.20x and 4.16x when two ran at once. The
-// penalty is read off that reading by the SAME two functions production uses,
-// so nothing here invents a shape: beyond what was measured the reading is held
-// rather than extrapolated.
-const MEASURED_PENALTIES = penaltiesFrom(7.12, [{ others: 1, speed: 4.18 }]);
-const penaltyFor = (others) => contentionPenalty(others, MEASURED_PENALTIES).penalty;
-
-// What a start and a stop cost, measured on the same host: a spawn with its
-// input open is 0.12 s there.
-const RUN_COSTS = { killCostSec: 0, firstByteWaitSec: 0.12 };
-
-
-/** A host that can afford two encoders, four-second segments, a cheap restart. */
-// A host that has measured itself: the start and the death from its own runs,
-// and what the swarm charges to fetch a second of film again. All four terms
-// have to be present for the drive-or-move comparison to mean anything, and a
-// host missing any of them keeps its encoders instead — which is its own check
-// below rather than the shape every other check is written against.
-const HOST = {
-  // Measured on the addon host: a second encoder beside the first costs about
-  // half its speed. Without it an extra process is free and the score always
-  // wants more of them.
-  contentionPenaltyFor: penaltyFor,
-  // What the startup benchmark says this host encodes at, in realtimes. It is
-  // measured before any viewer exists, so the plan always has a speed.
-  speedX: 2,
-  maxRuns: 2,
-  segmentSeconds: 4,
-  killCostSec: 0.5,
-  firstByteWaitSec: 1,
-  refetchSecPerFilmSecond: 0.25
-};
-
-/**
- * @param {Partial<import("../services/encode/EncodePlan.js").LiveRun>} run
- * @returns {import("../services/encode/EncodePlan.js").LiveRun}
- */
-function run(run_) {
-  // A run has no name: the plan hands back the run itself, so a test compares
-  // the thing rather than a token standing for it.
-  return { from: 0, to: 100, head: 0, speedX: 2, ...run_ };
-}
-
-test("a viewer waiting on nothing made starts one encoder, at what they are waiting for", () => {
-  // It starts where the viewer is stopped and runs to the end of the film,
-  // because nothing else is in the way. The window says where to start and
-  // whether to start; it does not say where to stop — a window travels forward
-  // as the viewer plays, and a run bounded by one has to be replaced every few
-  // seconds.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 40, to: 70 }],
-    runs: [],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.deepEqual(
-    actions.map((action) => ({ type: action.type, from: action.from, to: action.to })),
-    [{ type: "start", from: 40, to: 99 }]
-  );
-});
-
-test("two viewers a couple of numbers apart are never given the same stretch twice", () => {
-  // Found by the orchestrator's own checks. Under the old design the second
-  // viewer was given an encoder of their own while the run already there had
-  // nowhere left to go — two processes side by side for one stretch of film.
-  //
-  // The model answers it by arithmetic instead of by a rule: the number the
-  // second viewer stands on is due now and the encoder behind them needs six
-  // seconds, so it IS late; a new one delivers it in two, so placing one is
-  // worth it; and the one behind is then bounded to the two numbers it can still
-  // make and retires. One encoder, and the second viewer waits four seconds
-  // less. What must never happen — two of them running the same stretch — does
-  // not.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const runA = run({ from: 100, to: 999, head: 100 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 100, 999);
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 100, to: 130 }, { from: 102, to: 132 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  const spans = actions
-    .filter((action) => action.type !== "stop")
-    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to])
-    .sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
-  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
-    assert.ok(spans[index][1] < spans[index + 1][0],
-      `#${spans[index][0]}..#${spans[index][1]} overlaps #${spans[index + 1][0]}`);
-  }
-  assert.ok(spans.some(([from, to]) => from <= 102 && (to < from || to >= 102)),
-    "somebody is making what the second viewer needs");
-  // How MANY is the score's answer and not a rule: with these two standing two
-  // numbers apart, a second process makes the one in front wait 1.4 s longer and
-  // the one behind 2.5 s less, so the pair is better off. What is fixed is that
-  // they never share a stretch, which the loop above asserts.
-});
-
-test("a viewer whose whole window is already made starts nothing", () => {
-  // The case that used to restart an encoder to make a second copy of material
-  // sitting on the disk.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  for (let index = 40; index <= 70; index += 1) {
-    coverage.markReady(index);
-  }
-  const actions = planEncoders({ coverage, windows: [{ from: 40, to: 70 }], runs: [], ...HOST });
-  assert.deepEqual(actions, []);
-});
-
-test("a run is given an end at the edge of what is free", () => {
-  // Handed the rest of the film it would drive straight into another run's
-  // ground; handed the free stretch it stops where the covered material starts.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const runB = run({ from: 50, to: 80 });
-  coverage.claim(runB, 50, 80);
-  const actions = planEncoders({ coverage, windows: [{ from: 40, to: 90 }], runs: [], ...HOST });
-  assert.equal(actions.length, 1);
-  assert.deepEqual({ from: actions[0].from, to: actions[0].to }, { from: 40, to: 49 });
-});
-
-test("a run that has caught up with made material is not killed for it", () => {
-  // It has arrived at film somebody else made. Killing it was the old answer and
-  // it is never the right one: the work is either taken past the made stretch or
-  // left to drive through, and which of those depends on the score, but the
-  // encoder goes on existing either way.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const runA = run({ head: 10, from: 0, to: 100 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
-  for (let index = 10; index <= 30; index += 1) {
-    coverage.markReady(index);
-  }
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 90 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "stop"), false, "not killed");
-  assert.ok(
-    actions.some((action) => (action.type === "keep" || action.type === "move") && action.run === runA),
-    "it is still one of the encoders on this output"
-  );
-  // And nothing is arranged so that two of them make the same piece.
-  const spans = actions
-    .filter((action) => action.type !== "stop")
-    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to < action.from ? Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY : action.to])
-    .sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
-  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
-    assert.ok(spans[index][1] < spans[index + 1][0], "the stretches do not overlap");
-  }
-});
-
-test("a covered stretch shorter than a restart is driven through instead", () => {
-  // The comparison is of two measured quantities: the covered stretch divided
-  // by this run's own speed, against what a restart costs. One segment at 50x
-  // is 0.08 s of encoding against 0.12 s to move.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 50 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
-  coverage.markReady(10);
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    // From where the run stands, so the only question asked is the covered piece
-    // under it. Beginning at #0 would also be asking who makes #0..#9.
-    windows: [{ from: 10, to: 90 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
-  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
-});
-
-test("a run standing on film nobody has made is never taken away", () => {
-  // The field failure this guards: 684 starts in 482 seconds on 2026-09-05,
-  // because a run was moved whenever anything ahead of it had been made.
-  //
-  // Moving is priced rather than forbidden — a run standing ON made film may
-  // well be worth restarting one number along, and the two checks above measure
-  // both sides of that. What can never be worth it is moving a run that has
-  // nothing made under it or ahead of it: there is no work to skip, so the move
-  // buys nothing and costs a start.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 2 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 10, to: 90 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
-  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
-});
-
-test("a long stretch of made film is skipped, and the swarm's price is in the reckoning", () => {
-  // Driving through costs this encoder's time AND the swarm the same bytes a
-  // second time. Twenty made pieces of 4 s at 1x is 80 s of encoding plus 20 s
-  // of fetching, against a move priced at 0.12 + 0.5 + 3 seconds — so it skips.
-  //
-  // There is no separate comparison to read here: both are seconds, both are in
-  // the one score, and the arrangement with the smaller total is the one taken.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 200 });
-  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 1 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 200);
-  for (let at = 10; at < 30; at += 1) {
-    coverage.markReady(at);
-  }
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    // The viewer is PAST the made stretch, so the only question is this encoder:
-    // drive through twenty pieces that exist, or skip them. With a viewer at #0
-    // as well, something has to cross that stretch whatever happens, and then
-    // moving buys nothing — which the score says too, and is why the window
-    // starts where the viewer actually is.
-    windows: [{ from: 30, to: 190 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST,
-    // One encoder, so the question is only about THIS one: drive through the
-    // twenty pieces that exist, or skip them. With room for a second, the
-    // machine simply buys one and the question never arises.
-    maxRuns: 1,
-    killCostSec: 0.5,
-    firstByteWaitSec: 3,
-    refetchSecPerFilmSecond: 0.25
-  });
-  const move = actions.find((action) => action.type === "move");
-  assert.ok(move, "it is taken past the made film rather than left to make it again");
-  assert.equal(move.from, 30, "to the first thing nobody has");
-});
-
-test("a short covered stretch is driven through rather than paid a restart for", () => {
-  // One covered segment at 1x is 4 s of encoding plus 1 s of refetch, against a
-  // move priced at 0.12 + 0.5 + 30 seconds on a host where the first bytes are
-  // slow to come. The comparison, not a rule, decides it.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 200 });
-  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 1 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 200);
-  coverage.markReady(10);
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    // From where the run stands, so the only question is the covered piece under
-    // it. A window starting at #0 would also be asking who makes #0..#9.
-    windows: [{ from: 10, to: 190 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST,
-    killCostSec: 0.5,
-    firstByteWaitSec: 30,
-    refetchSecPerFilmSecond: 0.25
-  });
-  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
-  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
-});
-
-test("a run with nothing left ahead of it does not go on making nothing", () => {
-  // Everything from #10 to the end exists. The encoder standing at #10 has
-  // nothing to do there; whether it is stopped or taken back to the film before
-  // #0 that nobody has made is the score's answer, and both are right answers.
-  // What must not happen is that it stays where it is, producing nothing.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const runA = run({ head: 10 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
-  for (let index = 10; index < 100; index += 1) {
-    coverage.markReady(index);
-  }
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 90 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  const kept = actions.find((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA);
-  assert.equal(kept, undefined, "it is not left standing on film that already exists");
-  const madeAgain = actions.filter((action) => action.type !== "stop");
-  for (const action of madeAgain) {
-    assert.ok(action.from < 10, "and whatever is made is film nobody has");
-  }
-});
-
-test("every encoder stops when nobody is watching the output", () => {
-  // A look-ahead cannot answer this: it asks how far AHEAD of a viewer a run
-  // is, and there is no viewer.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  const runA = run();
-  const runB = run();
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [],
-    runs: [runA, runB],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.deepEqual(
-    actions.map((action) => [action.type, action.run]),
-    [["stop", runA], ["stop", runB]]
-  );
-});
-
-test("a run standing outside every window keeps working: the file is encoded whole", () => {
-  // The rule, stated by the user 2026-09-05: while a file is being encoded it
-  // is encoded whole, and a viewer decides the ORDER, not whether a run may
-  // live. Stopping a run for standing outside a window is what produced the
-  // field oscillation of that day — placed by one rule, killed by another,
-  // 350-700ms per cycle, nothing ever produced.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const runA = run({ from: 500, to: 600, head: 520 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 500, 600);
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 40 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.ok(
-    !actions.some((action) => action.type === "stop" && action.run === runA),
-    "it is making film that will be wanted, and nothing else is making it"
-  );
-});
-
-test("the same plan run twice on an unchanged state gives the same answer", () => {
-  // What the oscillation actually was: two passes over one state disagreeing
-  // with each other. Nothing about the state changes between them here.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const runA = run({ from: 500, to: 600, head: 520 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 500, 600);
-  const input = { coverage, windows: [{ from: 0, to: 40 }], runs: [runA], ...HOST };
-
-  const first = planEncoders(input).map((action) => action.type);
-  const second = planEncoders(input).map((action) => action.type);
-
-  assert.deepEqual(first, second);
-  assert.ok(!first.includes("stop"), "and neither pass kills what the other would start");
-});
-
-test("the one machine goes to whoever is due soonest, not to the smallest number", () => {
-  // Urgency is a TIME in this model, so the test states one. The far zone is
-  // lower in number and needed sooner; the order must come from the time.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [
-      { from: 0, to: 100, priority: 1, withinSeconds: 600 },
-      { from: 500, to: 530, priority: 3, withinSeconds: 0 }
-    ],
-    // A run whose speed has been measured: how long an encoder takes to reach a
-    // number is the whole comparison, and with nothing measured the model has no
-    // ground to prefer one place over another and places once.
-    runs: [run({ from: 900, to: 999, head: 900 })],
-    ...HOST,
-    maxRuns: 2
-  });
-  // WHERE the machine ends up, not how it got there. A run standing at #900
-  // reaches nothing anybody wants, so it is taken to #500 rather than killed and
-  // replaced — one process instead of a death and a cold start, which is
-  // strictly better and is what the plan now answers.
-  const placed = actions
-    .filter((action) => action.type === "start" || action.type === "move")
-    .map((action) => action.from);
-
-  assert.deepEqual(placed, [500], "the one machine goes where somebody is stopped");
-});
-
-test("two viewers far apart are both served, by however many encoders serve them soonest", () => {
-  // Two encoders, or one that goes to whichever of them is worse off: the answer
-  // is what a second process costs this machine, which is measured, and the
-  // score works it out. What must hold is that neither of them is simply left.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [
-      { from: 0, to: 30, withinSeconds: 0 },
-      { from: 800, to: 830, withinSeconds: 0 }
-    ],
-    runs: [run({ from: 900, to: 999, head: 900 })],
-    ...HOST,
-    maxRuns: 3
-  });
-  const spans = actions
-    .filter((action) => action.type !== "stop")
-    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to < action.from ? Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY : action.to]);
-  assert.ok(spans.some(([from, to]) => from <= 0 && to >= 0), "the one at the beginning is served");
-  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
-    const sorted = [...spans].sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
-    assert.ok(sorted[index][1] < sorted[index + 1][0], "and no two encoders share a number");
-  }
-});
-
-test("a machine that can hold one gives it to the viewer who is stopped soonest", () => {
-  // The bound is the host's own budget, the same arithmetic that decides the
-  // quality offer. Measured on the addon host 2026-09-03: at 1080p one encode
-  // saturates the machine and two land on realtime.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 800, to: 830 }, { from: 0, to: 30 }],
-    runs: [],
-    ...HOST,
-    maxRuns: 1
-  });
-  const started = actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start").map((action) => action.from);
-  assert.deepEqual(started, [0]);
-});
-
-test("a viewer joining behind a running encoder gets their own, not a dragged one", () => {
-  // This is what the whole layer is for. The run in front is untouched; the
-  // viewer behind is not made to wait for it to be pulled back.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
-  const runA = run({ from: 500, to: 600, head: 510 });
-  coverage.claim(runA, 500, 600);
-  // A head at #510 means #500..#509 are already made — that is what a head is.
-  // Left unsaid, the map believes a viewer is waiting on ten pieces nobody has,
-  // and moving the encoder back to make them is then the right answer.
-  for (let index = 500; index < 510; index += 1) {
-    coverage.markReady(index);
-  }
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 500, to: 530 }, { from: 100, to: 130 }],
-    runs: [runA],
-    ...HOST
-  });
-  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
-  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
-  const started = actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start");
-  assert.equal(started.length, 1);
-  assert.equal(started[0].from, 100);
-});
-
-test("the lowest thing a viewer is waiting for is reported, so a stalled plan is visible", () => {
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
-  coverage.setReady([40, 41]);
-  assert.equal(firstUnmetWant(coverage, [{ from: 40, to: 70 }]), 42);
-  coverage.setReady([40, 41, 42, 43, 44]);
-  assert.equal(firstUnmetWant(coverage, [{ from: 40, to: 44 }]), null);
-});
-
-test("a run with no end is making what the viewers ahead of it are waiting for", () => {
-  // Field, 2026-09-05: an encoder was started and killed every five seconds,
-  // each producing 0-2 segments, for as long as anybody watched. A run given no
-  // end carries `to = -1`, and two places read that as a number instead of as
-  // "no end": the overlap test called its work unwanted, and the claim it made
-  // in the coverage map was one segment long, so the plan saw the rest of the
-  // film as free and started another encoder there.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 570 });
-  const run = { from: 0, to: -1, head: 3, speedX: 8, isAlive: true };
-  coverage.claim(run, run.from, endOfRun(run));
-
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    live: [run],
-    wanted: [{ from: 0, to: 30 }],
-    maxRuns: 2,
-    segmentSeconds: 4,
-    ...RUN_COSTS
-  });
-
-  assert.deepEqual(
-    actions.filter((action) => action.type === "stop"),
-    [],
-    "nothing is stopped: it is making exactly what is wanted"
-  );
-  assert.deepEqual(
-    actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start"),
-    [],
-    "and nothing new is started over ground it already holds"
-  );
-});
-
-test("spare budget IS spent on the rest of the film, once nobody is waiting", () => {
-  // The user's own correction: film nobody is waiting for still has value,
-  // because a viewer seeking back into a part that exists starts playing at
-  // once. So what the machine has spare goes to finishing the file.
-  //
-  // "Once nobody is waiting" is not a condition written anywhere — it falls out
-  // of the score. A second process costs the first the measured share of the
-  // machine, so while somebody is stopped on a piece, adding one delays that
-  // piece and the first term refuses it. Here the near film is already made,
-  // nothing is late in either arrangement, and the two that finish the rest
-  // sooner win.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 400 });
-  for (let index = 0; index <= 9; index += 1) {
-    coverage.markReady(index);
-  }
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [
-      { from: 0, to: 9, priority: 32, withinSeconds: 0 },
-      { from: 10, to: 399, priority: 20, withinSeconds: 40 }
-    ],
-    runs: [],
-    ...HOST,
-    maxRuns: 4
-  });
-  const started = actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start");
-
-  assert.ok(started.length > 1, "the machine does not stand idle while film is unmade");
-  const spans = started
-    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to])
-    .sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
-  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
-    assert.ok(spans[index][1] < spans[index + 1][0], "and no two of them share a number");
-  }
-});
-
-
-test("two encoders never share a segment number", () => {
-  // The whole of what went wrong in the field: two encoders writing one name.
-  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 400 });
-  const actions = planEncoders({
-    coverage,
-    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 399, priority: 32 }],
-    runs: [],
-    ...HOST,
-    maxRuns: 4
-  });
-  const spans = actions
-    .filter((action) => action.type === "start")
-    .map((action) => ({ from: action.from, to: action.to }))
-    .sort((left, right) => left.from - right.from);
-
-  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
-    assert.ok(
-      spans[index].to < spans[index + 1].from,
-      `#${spans[index].from}..#${spans[index].to} overlaps #${spans[index + 1].from}`
-    );
-  }
-});
+/**
+ * @file How many encoders there should be, and where.
+ *
+ * Every case here is one the code used to get wrong for a reason recorded in
+ * `research/encoder-layer-2026-09-04.md`: a run placed at a viewer's position
+ * rather than at the first thing missing, a run with no end, and nothing that
+ * stops a run which has caught up with material already made.
+ */
+
+import test from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+import { CoverageMap } from "../services/encode/CoverageMap.js";
+import { endOfRun } from "../services/encode/EncodeRun.js";
+import { firstUnmetWant, planEncoders } from "../services/encode/EncodePlan.js";
+import { contentionPenalty, penaltiesFrom } from "../services/encode/contention.js";
+
+// WHAT A SECOND ENCODER COSTS THE FIRST — measured, never a formula.
+//
+// Addon host, 2026-09-03: 854x480 through libx264 `ultrafast` ran at 7.12x with
+// the machine to itself, and at 4.20x and 4.16x when two ran at once. The
+// penalty is read off that reading by the SAME two functions production uses,
+// so nothing here invents a shape: beyond what was measured the reading is held
+// rather than extrapolated.
+const MEASURED_PENALTIES = penaltiesFrom(7.12, [{ others: 1, speed: 4.18 }]);
+const penaltyFor = (others) => contentionPenalty(others, MEASURED_PENALTIES).penalty;
+
+// What a start and a stop cost, measured on the same host: a spawn with its
+// input open is 0.12 s there.
+const RUN_COSTS = { killCostSec: 0, firstByteWaitSec: 0.12 };
+
+
+/** A host that can afford two encoders, four-second segments, a cheap restart. */
+// A host that has measured itself: the start and the death from its own runs,
+// and what the swarm charges to fetch a second of film again. All four terms
+// have to be present for the drive-or-move comparison to mean anything, and a
+// host missing any of them keeps its encoders instead — which is its own check
+// below rather than the shape every other check is written against.
+const HOST = {
+  // Measured on the addon host: a second encoder beside the first costs about
+  // half its speed. Without it an extra process is free and the score always
+  // wants more of them.
+  contentionPenaltyFor: penaltyFor,
+  // What the startup benchmark says this host encodes at, in realtimes. It is
+  // measured before any viewer exists, so the plan always has a speed.
+  speedX: 2,
+  maxRuns: 2,
+  segmentSeconds: 4,
+  killCostSec: 0.5,
+  firstByteWaitSec: 1,
+  refetchSecPerFilmSecond: 0.25
+};
+
+/**
+ * @param {Partial<import("../services/encode/EncodePlan.js").LiveRun>} run
+ * @returns {import("../services/encode/EncodePlan.js").LiveRun}
+ */
+function run(run_) {
+  // A run has no name: the plan hands back the run itself, so a test compares
+  // the thing rather than a token standing for it.
+  return { from: 0, to: 100, head: 0, speedX: 2, ...run_ };
+}
+
+test("a viewer waiting on nothing made starts one encoder, at what they are waiting for", () => {
+  // It starts where the viewer is stopped and runs to the end of the film,
+  // because nothing else is in the way. The window says where to start and
+  // whether to start; it does not say where to stop — a window travels forward
+  // as the viewer plays, and a run bounded by one has to be replaced every few
+  // seconds.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 40, to: 70 }],
+    runs: [],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    actions.map((action) => ({ type: action.type, from: action.from, to: action.to })),
+    [{ type: "start", from: 40, to: 99 }]
+  );
+});
+
+test("two viewers a couple of numbers apart are never given the same stretch twice", () => {
+  // Found by the orchestrator's own checks. Under the old design the second
+  // viewer was given an encoder of their own while the run already there had
+  // nowhere left to go — two processes side by side for one stretch of film.
+  //
+  // The model answers it by arithmetic instead of by a rule: the number the
+  // second viewer stands on is due now and the encoder behind them needs six
+  // seconds, so it IS late; a new one delivers it in two, so placing one is
+  // worth it; and the one behind is then bounded to the two numbers it can still
+  // make and retires. One encoder, and the second viewer waits four seconds
+  // less. What must never happen — two of them running the same stretch — does
+  // not.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const runA = run({ from: 100, to: 999, head: 100 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 100, 999);
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 100, to: 130 }, { from: 102, to: 132 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  const spans = actions
+    .filter((action) => action.type !== "stop")
+    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to])
+    .sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
+  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
+    assert.ok(spans[index][1] < spans[index + 1][0],
+      `#${spans[index][0]}..#${spans[index][1]} overlaps #${spans[index + 1][0]}`);
+  }
+  assert.ok(spans.some(([from, to]) => from <= 102 && (to < from || to >= 102)),
+    "somebody is making what the second viewer needs");
+  // How MANY is the score's answer and not a rule: with these two standing two
+  // numbers apart, a second process makes the one in front wait 1.4 s longer and
+  // the one behind 2.5 s less, so the pair is better off. What is fixed is that
+  // they never share a stretch, which the loop above asserts.
+});
+
+test("a viewer whose whole window is already made starts nothing", () => {
+  // The case that used to restart an encoder to make a second copy of material
+  // sitting on the disk.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  for (let index = 40; index <= 70; index += 1) {
+    coverage.markReady(index);
+  }
+  const actions = planEncoders({ coverage, windows: [{ from: 40, to: 70 }], runs: [], ...HOST });
+  assert.deepEqual(actions, []);
+});
+
+test("a run is given an end at the edge of what is free", () => {
+  // Handed the rest of the film it would drive straight into another run's
+  // ground; handed the free stretch it stops where the covered material starts.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const runB = run({ from: 50, to: 80 });
+  coverage.claim(runB, 50, 80);
+  const actions = planEncoders({ coverage, windows: [{ from: 40, to: 90 }], runs: [], ...HOST });
+  assert.equal(actions.length, 1);
+  assert.deepEqual({ from: actions[0].from, to: actions[0].to }, { from: 40, to: 49 });
+});
+
+test("a run that has caught up with made material is not killed for it", () => {
+  // It has arrived at film somebody else made. Killing it was the old answer and
+  // it is never the right one: the work is either taken past the made stretch or
+  // left to drive through, and which of those depends on the score, but the
+  // encoder goes on existing either way.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const runA = run({ head: 10, from: 0, to: 100 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
+  for (let index = 10; index <= 30; index += 1) {
+    coverage.markReady(index);
+  }
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 90 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "stop"), false, "not killed");
+  assert.ok(
+    actions.some((action) => (action.type === "keep" || action.type === "move") && action.run === runA),
+    "it is still one of the encoders on this output"
+  );
+  // And nothing is arranged so that two of them make the same piece.
+  const spans = actions
+    .filter((action) => action.type !== "stop")
+    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to < action.from ? Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY : action.to])
+    .sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
+  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
+    assert.ok(spans[index][1] < spans[index + 1][0], "the stretches do not overlap");
+  }
+});
+
+test("a covered stretch shorter than a restart is driven through instead", () => {
+  // The comparison is of two measured quantities: the covered stretch divided
+  // by this run's own speed, against what a restart costs. One segment at 50x
+  // is 0.08 s of encoding against 0.12 s to move.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 50 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
+  coverage.markReady(10);
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    // From where the run stands, so the only question asked is the covered piece
+    // under it. Beginning at #0 would also be asking who makes #0..#9.
+    windows: [{ from: 10, to: 90 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
+  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
+});
+
+test("a run standing on film nobody has made is never taken away", () => {
+  // The field failure this guards: 684 starts in 482 seconds on 2026-09-05,
+  // because a run was moved whenever anything ahead of it had been made.
+  //
+  // Moving is priced rather than forbidden — a run standing ON made film may
+  // well be worth restarting one number along, and the two checks above measure
+  // both sides of that. What can never be worth it is moving a run that has
+  // nothing made under it or ahead of it: there is no work to skip, so the move
+  // buys nothing and costs a start.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 2 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 10, to: 90 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
+  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
+});
+
+test("a long stretch of made film is skipped, and the swarm's price is in the reckoning", () => {
+  // Driving through costs this encoder's time AND the swarm the same bytes a
+  // second time. Twenty made pieces of 4 s at 1x is 80 s of encoding plus 20 s
+  // of fetching, against a move priced at 0.12 + 0.5 + 3 seconds — so it skips.
+  //
+  // There is no separate comparison to read here: both are seconds, both are in
+  // the one score, and the arrangement with the smaller total is the one taken.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 200 });
+  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 1 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 200);
+  for (let at = 10; at < 30; at += 1) {
+    coverage.markReady(at);
+  }
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    // The viewer is PAST the made stretch, so the only question is this encoder:
+    // drive through twenty pieces that exist, or skip them. With a viewer at #0
+    // as well, something has to cross that stretch whatever happens, and then
+    // moving buys nothing — which the score says too, and is why the window
+    // starts where the viewer actually is.
+    windows: [{ from: 30, to: 190 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST,
+    // One encoder, so the question is only about THIS one: drive through the
+    // twenty pieces that exist, or skip them. With room for a second, the
+    // machine simply buys one and the question never arises.
+    maxRuns: 1,
+    killCostSec: 0.5,
+    firstByteWaitSec: 3,
+    refetchSecPerFilmSecond: 0.25
+  });
+  const move = actions.find((action) => action.type === "move");
+  assert.ok(move, "it is taken past the made film rather than left to make it again");
+  assert.equal(move.from, 30, "to the first thing nobody has");
+});
+
+test("a short covered stretch is driven through rather than paid a restart for", () => {
+  // One covered segment at 1x is 4 s of encoding plus 1 s of refetch, against a
+  // move priced at 0.12 + 0.5 + 30 seconds on a host where the first bytes are
+  // slow to come. The comparison, not a rule, decides it.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 200 });
+  const runA = run({ head: 10, speedX: 1 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 200);
+  coverage.markReady(10);
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    // From where the run stands, so the only question is the covered piece under
+    // it. A window starting at #0 would also be asking who makes #0..#9.
+    windows: [{ from: 10, to: 190 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST,
+    killCostSec: 0.5,
+    firstByteWaitSec: 30,
+    refetchSecPerFilmSecond: 0.25
+  });
+  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
+  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
+});
+
+test("a run with nothing left ahead of it does not go on making nothing", () => {
+  // Everything from #10 to the end exists. The encoder standing at #10 has
+  // nothing to do there; whether it is stopped or taken back to the film before
+  // #0 that nobody has made is the score's answer, and both are right answers.
+  // What must not happen is that it stays where it is, producing nothing.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const runA = run({ head: 10 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 0, 100);
+  for (let index = 10; index < 100; index += 1) {
+    coverage.markReady(index);
+  }
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 90 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  const kept = actions.find((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA);
+  assert.equal(kept, undefined, "it is not left standing on film that already exists");
+  const madeAgain = actions.filter((action) => action.type !== "stop");
+  for (const action of madeAgain) {
+    assert.ok(action.from < 10, "and whatever is made is film nobody has");
+  }
+});
+
+test("every encoder stops when nobody is watching the output", () => {
+  // A look-ahead cannot answer this: it asks how far AHEAD of a viewer a run
+  // is, and there is no viewer.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  const runA = run();
+  const runB = run();
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [],
+    runs: [runA, runB],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    actions.map((action) => [action.type, action.run]),
+    [["stop", runA], ["stop", runB]]
+  );
+});
+
+test("a run standing outside every window keeps working: the file is encoded whole", () => {
+  // The rule, stated by the user 2026-09-05: while a file is being encoded it
+  // is encoded whole, and a viewer decides the ORDER, not whether a run may
+  // live. Stopping a run for standing outside a window is what produced the
+  // field oscillation of that day — placed by one rule, killed by another,
+  // 350-700ms per cycle, nothing ever produced.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const runA = run({ from: 500, to: 600, head: 520 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 500, 600);
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 40 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.ok(
+    !actions.some((action) => action.type === "stop" && action.run === runA),
+    "it is making film that will be wanted, and nothing else is making it"
+  );
+});
+
+test("the same plan run twice on an unchanged state gives the same answer", () => {
+  // What the oscillation actually was: two passes over one state disagreeing
+  // with each other. Nothing about the state changes between them here.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const runA = run({ from: 500, to: 600, head: 520 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 500, 600);
+  const input = { coverage, windows: [{ from: 0, to: 40 }], runs: [runA], ...HOST };
+
+  const first = planEncoders(input).map((action) => action.type);
+  const second = planEncoders(input).map((action) => action.type);
+
+  assert.deepEqual(first, second);
+  assert.ok(!first.includes("stop"), "and neither pass kills what the other would start");
+});
+
+test("the one machine goes to whoever is due soonest, not to the smallest number", () => {
+  // Urgency is a TIME in this model, so the test states one. The far zone is
+  // lower in number and needed sooner; the order must come from the time.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [
+      { from: 0, to: 100, priority: 1, withinSeconds: 600 },
+      { from: 500, to: 530, priority: 3, withinSeconds: 0 }
+    ],
+    // A run whose speed has been measured: how long an encoder takes to reach a
+    // number is the whole comparison, and with nothing measured the model has no
+    // ground to prefer one place over another and places once.
+    runs: [run({ from: 900, to: 999, head: 900 })],
+    ...HOST,
+    maxRuns: 2
+  });
+  // WHERE the machine ends up, not how it got there. A run standing at #900
+  // reaches nothing anybody wants, so it is taken to #500 rather than killed and
+  // replaced — one process instead of a death and a cold start, which is
+  // strictly better and is what the plan now answers.
+  const placed = actions
+    .filter((action) => action.type === "start" || action.type === "move")
+    .map((action) => action.from);
+
+  assert.deepEqual(placed, [500], "the one machine goes where somebody is stopped");
+});
+
+test("two viewers far apart are both served, by however many encoders serve them soonest", () => {
+  // Two encoders, or one that goes to whichever of them is worse off: the answer
+  // is what a second process costs this machine, which is measured, and the
+  // score works it out. What must hold is that neither of them is simply left.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [
+      { from: 0, to: 30, withinSeconds: 0 },
+      { from: 800, to: 830, withinSeconds: 0 }
+    ],
+    runs: [run({ from: 900, to: 999, head: 900 })],
+    ...HOST,
+    maxRuns: 3
+  });
+  const spans = actions
+    .filter((action) => action.type !== "stop")
+    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to < action.from ? Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY : action.to]);
+  assert.ok(spans.some(([from, to]) => from <= 0 && to >= 0), "the one at the beginning is served");
+  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
+    const sorted = [...spans].sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
+    assert.ok(sorted[index][1] < sorted[index + 1][0], "and no two encoders share a number");
+  }
+});
+
+test("a machine that can hold one gives it to the viewer who is stopped soonest", () => {
+  // The bound is the host's own budget, the same arithmetic that decides the
+  // quality offer. Measured on the addon host 2026-09-03: at 1080p one encode
+  // saturates the machine and two land on realtime.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 800, to: 830 }, { from: 0, to: 30 }],
+    runs: [],
+    ...HOST,
+    maxRuns: 1
+  });
+  const started = actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start").map((action) => action.from);
+  assert.deepEqual(started, [0]);
+});
+
+test("a viewer joining behind a running encoder gets their own, not a dragged one", () => {
+  // This is what the whole layer is for. The run in front is untouched; the
+  // viewer behind is not made to wait for it to be pulled back.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 1000 });
+  const runA = run({ from: 500, to: 600, head: 510 });
+  coverage.claim(runA, 500, 600);
+  // A head at #510 means #500..#509 are already made — that is what a head is.
+  // Left unsaid, the map believes a viewer is waiting on ten pieces nobody has,
+  // and moving the encoder back to make them is then the right answer.
+  for (let index = 500; index < 510; index += 1) {
+    coverage.markReady(index);
+  }
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 500, to: 530 }, { from: 100, to: 130 }],
+    runs: [runA],
+    ...HOST
+  });
+  assert.ok(actions.some((action) => action.type === "keep" && action.run === runA));
+  assert.equal(actions.some((action) => action.type === "move"), false);
+  const started = actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start");
+  assert.equal(started.length, 1);
+  assert.equal(started[0].from, 100);
+});
+
+test("the lowest thing a viewer is waiting for is reported, so a stalled plan is visible", () => {
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 100 });
+  coverage.setReady([40, 41]);
+  assert.equal(firstUnmetWant(coverage, [{ from: 40, to: 70 }]), 42);
+  coverage.setReady([40, 41, 42, 43, 44]);
+  assert.equal(firstUnmetWant(coverage, [{ from: 40, to: 44 }]), null);
+});
+
+test("a run with no end is making what the viewers ahead of it are waiting for", () => {
+  // Field, 2026-09-05: an encoder was started and killed every five seconds,
+  // each producing 0-2 segments, for as long as anybody watched. A run given no
+  // end carries `to = -1`, and two places read that as a number instead of as
+  // "no end": the overlap test called its work unwanted, and the claim it made
+  // in the coverage map was one segment long, so the plan saw the rest of the
+  // film as free and started another encoder there.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 570 });
+  const run = { from: 0, to: -1, head: 3, speedX: 8, isAlive: true };
+  coverage.claim(run, run.from, endOfRun(run));
+
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    live: [run],
+    wanted: [{ from: 0, to: 30 }],
+    maxRuns: 2,
+    segmentSeconds: 4,
+    ...RUN_COSTS
+  });
+
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    actions.filter((action) => action.type === "stop"),
+    [],
+    "nothing is stopped: it is making exactly what is wanted"
+  );
+  assert.deepEqual(
+    actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start"),
+    [],
+    "and nothing new is started over ground it already holds"
+  );
+});
+
+test("spare budget IS spent on the rest of the film, once nobody is waiting", () => {
+  // The user's own correction: film nobody is waiting for still has value,
+  // because a viewer seeking back into a part that exists starts playing at
+  // once. So what the machine has spare goes to finishing the file.
+  //
+  // "Once nobody is waiting" is not a condition written anywhere — it falls out
+  // of the score. A second process costs the first the measured share of the
+  // machine, so while somebody is stopped on a piece, adding one delays that
+  // piece and the first term refuses it. Here the near film is already made,
+  // nothing is late in either arrangement, and the two that finish the rest
+  // sooner win.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 400 });
+  for (let index = 0; index <= 9; index += 1) {
+    coverage.markReady(index);
+  }
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [
+      { from: 0, to: 9, priority: 32, withinSeconds: 0 },
+      { from: 10, to: 399, priority: 20, withinSeconds: 40 }
+    ],
+    runs: [],
+    ...HOST,
+    maxRuns: 4
+  });
+  const started = actions.filter((action) => action.type === "start");
+
+  assert.ok(started.length > 1, "the machine does not stand idle while film is unmade");
+  const spans = started
+    .map((action) => [action.from, action.to])
+    .sort((left, right) => left[0] - right[0]);
+  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
+    assert.ok(spans[index][1] < spans[index + 1][0], "and no two of them share a number");
+  }
+});
+
+
+test("two encoders never share a segment number", () => {
+  // The whole of what went wrong in the field: two encoders writing one name.
+  const coverage = new CoverageMap({ segmentCount: 400 });
+  const actions = planEncoders({
+    coverage,
+    windows: [{ from: 0, to: 399, priority: 32 }],
+    runs: [],
+    ...HOST,
+    maxRuns: 4
+  });
+  const spans = actions
+    .filter((action) => action.type === "start")
+    .map((action) => ({ from: action.from, to: action.to }))
+    .sort((left, right) => left.from - right.from);
+
+  for (let index = 0; index < spans.length - 1; index += 1) {
+    assert.ok(
+      spans[index].to < spans[index + 1].from,
+      `#${spans[index].from}..#${spans[index].to} overlaps #${spans[index + 1].from}`
+    );
+  }
+});