@stephen-lord/docs 1.0.0 → 1.0.1

package/dist-docs/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineering/examples/x-to-book-system/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+# Example: X-to-Book Multi-Agent System
+
+This example demonstrates how the Agent Skills for Context Engineering can be applied to design a production multi-agent system. The system monitors X (Twitter) accounts and generates daily synthesized books from their content.
+
+## The Problem
+
+A user requested a multi-agent system that:
+- Monitors target X accounts daily
+- Extracts insights and patterns from tweets
+- Produces structured book output
+
+This is a non-trivial agent system because:
+- High-volume data (hundreds of tweets per day)
+- Long-form output requiring coherence
+- Temporal awareness (tracking how narratives evolve)
+- Quality requirements (accurate attribution, no hallucination)
+
+## Skills Applied
+
+### 1. multi-agent-patterns
+
+**Decision**: Selected Supervisor/Orchestrator pattern over peer-to-peer swarm.
+
+**Reasoning from skill**:
+> "The supervisor pattern places a central agent in control, delegating to specialists and synthesizing results. The supervisor maintains global state and trajectory, decomposes user objectives into subtasks, and routes to appropriate workers."
+
+**Application**: Book production has clear sequential phases (scrape → analyze → synthesize → write → edit) that benefit from central coordination. Quality gates between phases require explicit checkpoints.
+
+**Failure mode addressed**:
+> "Supervisor Bottleneck: The supervisor accumulates context from all workers, becoming susceptible to saturation and degradation."
+
+**Mitigation applied**: Raw tweet data never passes through Orchestrator context. Scraper writes to file system, other agents read from file system. Orchestrator receives only phase summaries.
+
+### 2. context-fundamentals
+
+**Decision**: Strict context budgets per agent with progressive disclosure.
+
+**Reasoning from skill**:
+> "Context must be treated as a finite resource with diminishing marginal returns. Like humans with limited working memory, language models have an attention budget drawn on when parsing large volumes of context."
+
+**Application**: Each agent has an explicit token budget:
+- Orchestrator: 50k (routing only)
+- Scraper: 20k (one account at a time)
+- Writer: 80k (one chapter at a time)
+
+**Principle applied**:
+> "Progressive disclosure manages context efficiently by loading information only as needed."
+
+**Application**: Book outline loads first (lightweight). Full chapter content loads only when Writer is working on that specific chapter.
+
+### 3. memory-systems
+
+**Decision**: Temporal Knowledge Graph over simple vector store.
+
+**Reasoning from skill**:
+> "Vector stores lose relationship information... Vector stores also struggle with temporal validity. Facts change over time, but vector stores provide no mechanism to distinguish 'current fact' from 'outdated fact'."
+
+**Application**: The system needs to answer queries like:
+- "What was @account's position on AI regulation in January?"
+- "Which accounts agree/disagree on crypto?"
+
+These require relationship traversal and temporal validity that vector stores cannot provide.
+
+**Architecture from skill**:
+> "Temporal knowledge graphs add validity periods to facts. Each fact has a 'valid from' and optionally 'valid until' timestamp."
+
+**Application**: All relationships (DISCUSSES, AGREES_WITH, DISAGREES_WITH) have temporal validity periods.
+
+### 4. context-optimization
+
+**Decision**: Observation masking for tweet data.
+
+**Reasoning from skill**:
+> "Tool outputs can comprise 80%+ of token usage in agent trajectories. Much of this is verbose output that has already served its purpose."
+
+**Application**: Daily tweet volume could reach 100k+ tokens. This data is:
+1. Processed by Scraper
+2. Written to file system (not passed through context)
+3. Read by Analyzer in chunks
+4. Summarized before reaching Synthesizer
+
+**Compaction trigger from skill**:
+> "Compaction is the practice of summarizing context contents when approaching limits."
+
+**Application**: Phase outputs are compacted at 70% context utilization before passing to next phase.
+
+### 5. tool-design
+
+**Decision**: Three consolidated tools instead of 15+ narrow tools.
+
+**Reasoning from skill**:
+> "The consolidation principle states that if a human engineer cannot definitively say which tool should be used in a given situation, an agent cannot be expected to do better."
+
+**Application**: Instead of separate tools for `fetch_timeline`, `fetch_thread`, `fetch_engagement`, `search_tweets`, we implement one `x_data_tool` with an action parameter.
+
+**Tool description pattern from skill**:
+> "Effective tool descriptions answer four questions: What does the tool do? When should it be used? What inputs does it accept? What does it return?"
+
+**Application**: Each tool has explicit usage triggers, parameter documentation, and error recovery guidance.
+
+### 6. evaluation
+
+**Decision**: Multi-dimensional rubric with automated pipeline.
+
+**Reasoning from skill**:
+> "Agent quality is not a single dimension. It includes factual accuracy, completeness, coherence, tool efficiency, and process quality."
+
+**Application**: Five evaluation dimensions weighted by importance:
+- Source Accuracy (30%) - quotes verified against original tweets
+- Thematic Coherence (25%) - narrative flow
+- Completeness (20%) - theme coverage
+- Insight Quality (15%) - synthesis beyond restating
+- Readability (10%) - prose quality
+
+**Human review trigger from skill**:
+> "Human evaluation catches what automation misses."
+
+**Application**: Books scoring below 0.7 or with source accuracy below 0.8 are flagged for human review.
+
+## Architecture Diagram
+
+```
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│                     ORCHESTRATOR AGENT                          │
+│  Context: 50k tokens (routing, checkpoints, no raw data)        │
+│  Pattern: Supervisor with file-system coordination              │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+         │              │              │              │
+         ▼              ▼              ▼              ▼
+┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
+│   SCRAPER   │ │  ANALYZER   │ │   WRITER    │ │   EDITOR    │
+│   20k ctx   │ │   80k ctx   │ │   80k ctx   │ │   60k ctx   │
+│ Per-account │ │ Per-account │ │ Per-chapter │ │ Per-chapter │
+└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
+         │              │              │              │
+         ▼              ▼              ▼              ▼
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│                     FILE SYSTEM STORAGE                          │
+│  raw_data/{account}/{date}.json                                  │
+│  analysis/{account}/{date}.json                                  │
+│  drafts/{book_id}/chapter_{n}.md                                 │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+         │
+         ▼
+┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
+│                 TEMPORAL KNOWLEDGE GRAPH                         │
+│  Entities: Account, Tweet, Theme, Book, Chapter                  │
+│  Relationships: POSTED, DISCUSSES, AGREES_WITH, SOURCES          │
+│  All relationships have temporal validity periods                │
+└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
+```
+
+## Key Patterns Demonstrated
+
+| Pattern | Skill Source | Application |
+|---------|--------------|-------------|
+| Context isolation via sub-agents | multi-agent-patterns | Each agent has clean context for its phase |
+| File system as coordination mechanism | multi-agent-patterns | Avoids context bloat from shared state passing |
+| Progressive disclosure | context-fundamentals | Chapter content loads only when needed |
+| Temporal knowledge graph | memory-systems | Tracks evolving positions over time |
+| Observation masking | context-optimization | Raw tweets never enter orchestrator context |
+| Tool consolidation | tool-design | 3 tools instead of 15+ |
+| Multi-dimensional evaluation | evaluation | 5 weighted quality dimensions |
+
+## Files
+
+- [PRD.md](./PRD.md) - Complete Product Requirements Document
+- [SKILLS-MAPPING.md](./SKILLS-MAPPING.md) - Detailed mapping of skills to design decisions
+
+## Using This Example
+
+This example serves as a template for applying context engineering skills to new projects:
+
+1. **Identify context challenges**: What are the volume constraints? What causes context saturation?
+2. **Select architecture pattern**: Based on coordination needs, choose supervisor, swarm, or hierarchical
+3. **Design memory system**: Based on query patterns, choose vector store, knowledge graph, or temporal graph
+4. **Apply optimization techniques**: Observation masking, compaction, progressive disclosure as needed
+5. **Build evaluation framework**: Define dimensions relevant to your use case
+
+The skills provide the vocabulary and patterns; the application requires understanding your specific constraints.
+

package/dist-docs/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineering/examples/x-to-book-system/SKILLS-MAPPING.md

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
+# Skills Mapping: X-to-Book System
+
+This document provides a detailed mapping between the Agent Skills for Context Engineering and the design decisions in the X-to-Book system PRD.
+
+## Skill: multi-agent-patterns
+
+### Concepts Applied
+
+| Concept | Skill Reference | PRD Application |
+|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| Supervisor pattern | "The supervisor pattern places a central agent in control, delegating to specialists and synthesizing results." | Orchestrator agent coordinates Scraper, Analyzer, Synthesizer, Writer, Editor agents |
+| Context isolation | "Sub-agents exist primarily to isolate context, not to anthropomorphize role division." | Each agent operates in clean context focused on its phase |
+| Telephone game problem | "LangGraph benchmarks found supervisor architectures initially performed 50% worse due to the 'telephone game' problem where supervisors paraphrase sub-agent responses incorrectly." | Phase outputs stored in file system, not passed through Orchestrator for synthesis |
+| File system coordination | "For complex tasks requiring shared state, agents read and write to persistent storage." | All inter-agent data flows through file system |
+| Supervisor bottleneck mitigation | "Implement output schema constraints so workers return only distilled summaries." | Orchestrator receives phase summaries, never raw data |
+
+### Pattern Selection Rationale
+
+The skill describes three patterns:
+
+1. **Supervisor/Orchestrator**: "When to use: Complex tasks with clear decomposition, tasks requiring coordination across domains."
+2. **Peer-to-Peer/Swarm**: "When to use: Tasks requiring flexible exploration, tasks where rigid planning is counterproductive."
+3. **Hierarchical**: "When to use: Large-scale projects with clear hierarchical structure."
+
+**Selected**: Supervisor/Orchestrator
+
+**Rationale**: Book production has clear sequential phases (scrape → analyze → synthesize → write → edit). Quality gates between phases require central coordination. Human oversight is important for content quality.
+
+---
+
+## Skill: context-fundamentals
+
+### Concepts Applied
+
+| Concept | Skill Reference | PRD Application |
+|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| Context as finite resource | "Context must be treated as a finite resource with diminishing marginal returns." | Explicit token budgets per agent (Orchestrator 50k, Writer 80k, etc.) |
+| Progressive disclosure | "Progressive disclosure manages context efficiently by loading information only as needed." | Book outline loads first; chapter content loads only when Writer works on that chapter |
+| Attention budget | "Models develop attention patterns from training data distributions where shorter sequences predominate." | Context limits set conservatively below model maximums |
+| Tool output volume | "Tool outputs comprise the majority of tokens in typical agent trajectories, with research showing observations can reach 83.9% of total context usage." | Tweet data processed separately, never enters main agent contexts |
+
+### Context Budget Allocation
+
+From skill: "Design with explicit context budgets in mind. Know the effective context limit for your model and task."
+
+PRD implementation:
+
+```yaml
+context_limits:
+  orchestrator: 50000   # Routing only, no raw data
+  scraper: 20000        # One account at a time
+  analyzer: 80000       # Pattern extraction
+  synthesizer: 100000   # Cross-account synthesis
+  writer: 80000         # Per-chapter drafting
+  editor: 60000         # Per-chapter review
+```
+
+---
+
+## Skill: memory-systems
+
+### Concepts Applied
+
+| Concept | Skill Reference | PRD Application |
+|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| Vector store limitations | "Vector stores lose relationship information... cannot answer 'What products did customers who purchased Product Y also buy?'" | Selected knowledge graph for relationship queries between accounts |
+| Temporal validity | "Temporal knowledge graphs add validity periods to facts. Each fact has a 'valid from' and optionally 'valid until' timestamp." | All relationships have temporal validity for tracking position evolution |
+| Entity memory | "Entity memory specifically tracks information about entities to maintain consistency." | Account, Tweet, Theme, Book, Chapter entity types defined |
+
+### Memory Architecture Decision
+
+From skill: "Choose memory architecture based on requirements: Simple persistence needs → File-system memory; Semantic search needs → Vector RAG; Relationship reasoning needs → Knowledge graph; Temporal validity needs → Temporal knowledge graph."
+
+**Query requirements identified**:
+- "What has @account said about AI in the last 30 days?" → Temporal + entity filtering
+- "Which accounts disagree on crypto?" → Relationship traversal
+- "How has @account's position evolved?" → Temporal queries
+
+**Selected**: Temporal Knowledge Graph
+
+---
+
+## Skill: context-optimization
+
+### Concepts Applied
+
+| Concept | Skill Reference | PRD Application |
+|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| Observation masking | "Observation masking replaces verbose tool outputs with compact references." | Raw tweet data stored in file system, not passed through context |
+| Compaction triggers | "Trigger compaction after significant memory accumulation, when retrieval returns too many outdated results." | 70% context utilization triggers compaction |
+| KV-cache optimization | "Place stable elements first (system prompt, tool definitions), then frequently reused elements, then unique elements last." | Context ordering: system prompt → tools → account config → daily outline → current task |
+
+### Optimization Strategy
+
+From skill: "When to optimize: Context utilization exceeds 70%, Response quality degrades as conversations extend."
+
+PRD implementation:
+```python
+COMPACTION_THRESHOLD = 0.7  # 70% context utilization
+
+if context_utilization > COMPACTION_THRESHOLD:
+    phase_outputs = compact_phase_outputs(phase_outputs)
+```
+
+From skill: "What to apply: Tool outputs dominate → observation masking"
+
+PRD implementation: All raw tweet data (potentially 100k+ tokens/day) is masked by:
+1. Scraper writes to file system
+2. Analyzer reads from file system, produces summaries
+3. Summaries (not raw data) flow to subsequent phases
+
+---
+
+## Skill: tool-design
+
+### Concepts Applied
+
+| Concept | Skill Reference | PRD Application |
+|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| Consolidation principle | "If a human engineer cannot definitively say which tool should be used in a given situation, an agent cannot be expected to do better." | 3 consolidated tools instead of 15+ narrow tools |
+| Description structure | "Effective tool descriptions answer four questions: What does the tool do? When should it be used? What inputs does it accept? What does it return?" | All tools have explicit usage triggers and error recovery |
+| Response format options | "Implementing response format options gives agents control over verbosity." | Tools support "concise" and "detailed" format parameters |
+| Error message design | "Error messages must be actionable. They must tell the agent what went wrong and how to correct it." | Errors include recovery guidance (RATE_LIMITED includes retry_after) |
+
+### Tool Consolidation
+
+From skill: "Instead of implementing list_users, list_events, and create_event, implement schedule_event that handles the full workflow internally."
+
+PRD implementation:
+
+**Before consolidation** (what we avoided):
+- `fetch_timeline`
+- `fetch_thread`
+- `fetch_engagement`
+- `search_tweets`
+- `store_entity`
+- `query_entities`
+- `update_validity`
+- etc.
+
+**After consolidation**:
+- `x_data_tool` - all X data operations
+- `memory_tool` - all knowledge graph operations
+- `writing_tool` - all content operations
+
+---
+
+## Skill: evaluation
+
+### Concepts Applied
+
+| Concept | Skill Reference | PRD Application |
+|---------|-----------------|-----------------|
+| Multi-dimensional rubrics | "Agent quality is not a single dimension. It includes factual accuracy, completeness, coherence, tool efficiency, and process quality." | 5 weighted dimensions: Source Accuracy, Thematic Coherence, Completeness, Insight Quality, Readability |
+| LLM-as-judge | "LLM-based evaluation scales to large test sets and provides consistent judgments." | Automated evaluation for coherence and insight quality |
+| Human evaluation | "Human evaluation catches what automation misses." | Trigger human review when score < 0.7 or source accuracy < 0.8 |
+| Outcome-focused evaluation | "The solution is outcome-focused evaluation that judges whether agents achieve right outcomes while following reasonable processes." | Evaluate final book quality, not intermediate steps |
+
+### Evaluation Rubric
+
+From skill: "Effective rubrics cover key dimensions with descriptive levels."
+
+PRD implementation:
+
+| Dimension | Weight | Measurement |
+|-----------|--------|-------------|
+| Source Accuracy | 30% | Automated quote verification against original tweets |
+| Thematic Coherence | 25% | LLM-as-judge for narrative flow |
+| Completeness | 20% | Theme coverage calculation |
+| Insight Quality | 15% | LLM-as-judge for synthesis beyond restating |
+| Readability | 10% | Automated metrics + LLM judge |
+
+---
+
+## Cross-Skill Integration
+
+The skills are designed to work together. This example demonstrates integration patterns:
+
+| Integration | Skills Combined | Application |
+|-------------|-----------------|-------------|
+| Agent context budgets | multi-agent-patterns + context-fundamentals | Each agent has explicit limits based on role |
+| File system coordination | multi-agent-patterns + context-optimization | Avoids context passing, enables masking |
+| Memory-aware synthesis | memory-systems + context-optimization | Query relevant facts without loading full history |
+| Quality-driven routing | evaluation + multi-agent-patterns | Orchestrator uses quality scores for phase gates |
+
+This integration is the core value proposition of the skills collection: they provide complementary patterns that address different aspects of context engineering while working together cohesively.
+

package/dist-docs/Agent-Skills-for-Context-Engineering/researcher/example_output.md

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+# The Infinite Software Crisis – Jake Nations, Netflix
+
+**Evaluation ID:** `a7f3c8e1-4b2d-4f9a-8c1e-3d5f7a9b2c4e`
+**Timestamp:** 2025-01-10T14:32:00Z
+**Source:**
+* **URL:** [AI Summit 2025 - Context Compression Talk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIoohUmYpGI&t=5s)
+* **Title:** Understanding Systems Before Automating: Context Compression and the Three-Phase Workflow
+* **Author:** Netflix Engineering (speaker unnamed in transcript)
+* **Type:** engineering_blog
+
+---
+
+## Gatekeeper Analysis
+
+* **G1 Mechanism Specificity:** **PASS**
+    * *Evidence:* Defines explicit three-phase mechanism: Research (analyze codebase, map dependencies, produce research document) → Planning (function signatures, type definitions, data flow, 'paint by numbers' spec) → Implementation (execute against specification with background agents). Also introduces 'context compression' as specific pattern: 5M tokens → 2,000 words of specification.
+* **G2 Implementable Artifacts:** **PASS**
+    * *Evidence:* Describes concrete workflow structure: research phase outputs 'a single research document'; planning phase produces 'function signatures, type definitions, data flow'; human checkpoints at phase boundaries. Provides example workflow for authorization refactor showing manual migration PR used as research seed. While no code snippets, the methodology structure is specific enough to implement.
+* **G3 Beyond Basics:** **PASS**
+    * *Evidence:* Addresses advanced patterns: multi-phase agent orchestration with human validation, context compression for 5M+ token codebases, distinction between essential/accidental complexity for AI, using manual work artifacts as research seeds, pattern recognition atrophy in AI-assisted development.
+* **G4 Source Verifiability:** **PASS**
+    * *Evidence:* Speaker explicitly states: 'I spent the last few years at Netflix helping drive adoption of AI tools.' References production codebase of 'around a million lines of Java' and '5 million tokens' in main service. Discusses real authorization refactoring work in production. Presented at AI Summit (technical conference).
+
+**Gatekeeper Verdict:** `PASS`
+
+---
+
+## Scoring Analysis
+
+| Metric | Score | Reasoning |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| **D1 Technical Depth** | **1** | The video provides a clear three-phase methodology with specific guidance: (1) Research phase: feed architecture diagrams, documentation, Slack threads; probe iteratively with questions like 'what about caching?'; output is single research document. (2) Planning phase: create 'paint by numbers' implementation plan with function signatures, type definitions, data flow. (3) Implementation: execute against clean spec using background agents. Also provides real example showing how manual migration PR was fed into research as seed. However, lacks actual code snippets, prompt templates, or document schemas. The methodology is conceptual rather than executable - practitioner would need to design their own document structures. The speaker acknowledges context compression approach 'you call it context engineering or spec-driven development, whatever you want' suggesting the pattern is well-known, but provides good operationalization. |
+| **D2 Context Engineering Relevance** | **2** | Directly addresses core Context Engineering topics. Context Processing: entire talk is about compressing 5M tokens to 2,000 words specification. Context Management: discusses selective context inclusion ('I had to select what to include. Design docs, architecture, diagrams, key interfaces'). Speaker explicitly coins/uses 'context compression' terminology. Key CE insights include: (1) token economics awareness ('no context window I have access to can hold it'), (2) selective context curation, (3) AI's inability to distinguish essential from accidental complexity, (4) human checkpoints as 'highest leverage moment in entire process.' Maps directly to Context Engineering Survey's context processing and context management components. |
+| **D3 Evidence Rigor** | **1** | Evidence is experience-based rather than quantitative. Provides: (1) Production context at Netflix (million-line codebase), (2) Real authorization refactor example with failure modes described ('agent would start refactoring, get a few files in and hit a dependency couldn't untangle and just spiral out of control'), (3) Honest acknowledgment of ongoing work ('we're actually working on it now starting to make some good progress'). Missing: quantitative metrics (time saved, iteration counts, success rates), comparison to baselines, reproducible experiments. The speaker discusses failure modes honestly and doesn't overclaim success. Cloudflare incident reference adds credibility to production concerns. Overall: reasonable practitioner experience but not rigorous validation. |
+| **D4 Novelty / Insight** | **2** | Several novel or well-synthesized insights: (1) 'Easy vs Simple' framework (Rich Hickey) applied specifically to AI code generation - 'AI has destroyed that balance because it's the ultimate easy button' is novel synthesis. (2) 'Earned understanding' principle - must do manual migration first to understand constraints before encoding into AI process. (3) 'AI treats every pattern as a requirement' - mental model for why AI cannot distinguish essential from accidental complexity. (4) Pattern recognition atrophy - 'That instinct that says this is getting complex atrophies when you don't understand your own system' addresses long-term capability concerns rarely discussed. (5) Manual PR as research seed - practical technique for bootstrapping AI-assisted refactoring. The three-phase workflow itself is not fundamentally new but the framing and operationalization adds value. |
+
+**Weighted Total:** `1.45`
+*Calculation:* `(1×0.35) + (2×0.30) + (1×0.20) + (2×0.15) = 0.35 + 0.60 + 0.20 + 0.30 = 1.45`
+
+---
+
+## Decision
+
+* **Verdict:** `HUMAN_REVIEW`
+* **Override Triggered:** `O3`
+* **Confidence:** Medium
+* **Justification:** Strong conceptual content with novel frameworks (easy vs simple applied to AI, earned understanding principle) and direct CE relevance. Score exceeds 1.4 threshold for APPROVE, but O3 override triggers because Evidence (D3) = 1. Production claims from Netflix should be verified for reproducibility before integration. The three-phase workflow is well-articulated but lacks implementation artifacts—human should assess whether methodology alone provides sufficient value or if we need to request/develop concrete templates.
+
+---
+
+## Skill Extraction
+
+* **Extractable:** Yes
+* **Skill Name:** `StructureAIWorkflowForUnderstanding`
+* **Taxonomy Category:** context_processing
+* **Description:** Three-phase workflow (Research → Plan → Implement) with human checkpoints for maintaining system understanding when using AI code generation at scale.
+* **Implementation Type:** architecture
+* **Estimated Complexity:** medium
+
+---
+
+## Human Review Notes
+
+This content has significant overlap with the existing context-compression skill but approaches from a different angle. The existing skill covers *how to compress* (strategies, evaluation metrics, probe types). This video covers *why and when to compress* and the workflow around it. Recommend integration as follows:
+
+1.  **ADD** to context-compression skill's 'Practical Guidance' section: The three-phase workflow (Research → Plan → Implement) as a macro-level pattern for using compression in practice.
+2.  **ADD** 'earned understanding' principle: The insight that manual migration should precede AI-assisted work—do one task by hand, then use that artifact as research seed.
+3.  **ADD** to 'When to Activate': Recognition that context compression is needed when codebases exceed context windows (5M tokens example).
+4.  **CONSIDER** new skill: 'Easy vs Simple for AI' could be a standalone skill about recognizing when AI tooling encourages complexity accumulation vs. structural simplicity.
+5.  **VERIFY**: The Netflix claims are reasonable but unquantified. Before citing, confirm the three-phase approach produces measurable improvements in the authorization refactor case.
+
+**Key quotes to preserve:**
+* "5 million tokens became 2,000 words of specification"
+* "The human checkpoint here is critical. This is where you validate the analysis against reality. The highest leverage moment in the entire process."
+* "We had to earn the understanding before we could code it into our process"