@stacksjs/defaults 0.75.108 → 0.75.110

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-beats/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+name: stacks-writing-beats
+description: Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it. Covers Stacks engineering workflows.
+disable-model-invocation: true
+license: MIT
+compatibility: Bun >= 1.3.0, TypeScript
+allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Bash Grep Glob
+---
+
+# Writing Beats
+
+Read [the Stacks adaptation rules](../stacks-flow/ENGINEERING.md), then
+[PLAYBOOK.md](PLAYBOOK.md). The playbook preserves this workflow's decision
+criteria; the Stacks rules govern APIs, tooling, tracking, and authorization.
+
+Credit: adapted from Matt Pocock's `writing-beats` skill, MIT licensed.
+See [NOTICE.md](NOTICE.md) and [LICENSE](LICENSE).
+
+This source is in upstream's in-progress collection. Use it explicitly as an
+optional workflow; do not install tooling or start background work merely
+because the skill is present.
+
+## Completion
+
+Produce the requested behavior or reviewable artifact and satisfy the
+playbook's completion criteria. Preserve existing decisions and user edits.
+Use the native Stacks skills for implementation and verification, and carry
+existing authorization through the workflow.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-for-agents/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Matt Pocock
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-for-agents/NOTICE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Source and license
+
+The upstream MIT notice is preserved in [LICENSE](LICENSE).
+
+## writing-for-agents
+
+Source: [skills/productivity/writing-for-agents/SKILL.md](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills/blob/49dd158d1076134a641b33efb035946536778336/skills/productivity/writing-for-agents/SKILL.md),
+revision `49dd158d1076134a641b33efb035946536778336`.
+
+Reviewed against the existing Stacks workflow. Stacks API guidance is retained; current workflow changes and supporting references are integrated where applicable.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-for-agents/SKILL.md

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ project `AGENTS.md`, a doc reached by a pointer. The packaging differs, the
 writing does not. The same levers make each one predictable, because the agent
 takes the same *process* every run rather than producing the same output.
 
-Stacks ships 115 skills and expects projects to add their own under
+Stacks ships 203 skills and expects projects to add their own under
 `app/Skills/`, so this is the skill that keeps that set from turning to sludge.
 The Stacks-specific mechanics (frontmatter, invocation, the override model,
 what `buddy setup:ai` does with the result) are in
@@ -216,3 +216,9 @@ positive target so attention lands on what to do.
 > Reach for `stacks-retro` after a session to find which documents actually
 > failed, and `stacks-flow` when the problem is that nobody remembers a skill
 > exists.
+
+## Upstream provenance
+
+The reviewed source revision and MIT notice are in [NOTICE.md](NOTICE.md) and
+[LICENSE](LICENSE). Read [the Stacks adaptation rules](../stacks-flow/ENGINEERING.md)
+with this workflow. Existing Stacks APIs and supporting helpers remain authoritative.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-fragments/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Matt Pocock
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-fragments/NOTICE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Source and license
+
+The upstream MIT notice is preserved in [LICENSE](LICENSE).
+
+## writing-fragments
+
+Source: [skills/in-progress/writing-fragments/SKILL.md](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills/blob/49dd158d1076134a641b33efb035946536778336/skills/in-progress/writing-fragments/SKILL.md),
+revision `49dd158d1076134a641b33efb035946536778336`. This workflow is in progress upstream.
+
+Ported with Stacks skill names, canonical guidance, local-tracker fallback, TypeScript/Bun tooling, and conditional external actions.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-fragments/PLAYBOOK.md

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+> Adapted playbook. Read [the Stacks rules](../stacks-flow/ENGINEERING.md) first. Commit, push, publish, and tracker mutations are conditional on the user's authorization.
+
+
+<what-to-do>
+
+This is pure **explore**: widen the space of what could be written without committing to structure. Committing is _exploit_, a separate skill's job. Run a grilling session that produces fragments, interviewing the user relentlessly about whatever they want to write about. Imposing phases, outlines, or article structure is out of scope here.
+
+As fragments emerge from either side of the conversation, append them to a single markdown file.
+
+If the user did not pass a path, ask once where to save the document, then remember it for the rest of the session.
+
+Capture fragments from the very first thing the user says, including the initial prompt.
+
+On first write, put a single H1 at the top with a working title (it can change later) and nothing else: no metadata, no TOC, no date.
+
+</what-to-do>
+
+<supporting-info>
+
+## What is a fragment
+
+A fragment is any piece of text that might survive into the final article. It must be _readable by the author_ (the author can tell what it means), but it does not need to define its terms or be comprehensible to a cold reader. The bar is "is this a piece of good writing?", not "is this a self-contained argument?"
+
+Fragments are deliberately heterogeneous. Examples of what could be a fragment:
+
+- A sharp sentence you'd want to deploy somewhere but don't yet know where.
+- A claim with a one-line justification.
+- A vignette: a thing that happened, a code snippet, a scenario, an analogy.
+- A half-thought: "something about how X feels like Y, work this out later."
+- A quote, a piece of dialogue, an overheard line.
+- A list of related observations that hang together by feel.
+- A complaint, a confession, a punchline.
+- A **leading word**: a compact metaphor or coinage the whole piece can hang on (one term that names the idea, the way _tracer bullets_ or _fog of war_ names a whole pattern).
+
+Of these, the leading word is the most valuable fragment to land. It is load-bearing: name the right one in explore and it shapes the structure, the transitions, and the title later, paying dividends through the entire exploit phase. When the conversation circles a recurring idea, push to coin a word for it.
+
+The novelist's diary is the model: years of unstructured noticings that later get mined for raw material. Fragments are noticings.
+
+## File format
+
+```markdown
+# Working title
+
+A first fragment lives here.
+
+It can be multiple paragraphs. It can include lists, code, quotes: whatever
+shape the fragment naturally takes.
+
+---
+
+A second fragment.
+
+---
+
+> A quoted line that the user wants to keep around.
+
+A reaction to it.
+
+---
+
+- A cluster of related observations
+- That hang together by feel
+- And want to be near each other
+```
+
+Fragments are separated by a horizontal rule (`\n---\n`). No headings inside the body. No tags. No order beyond the order they were added.
+
+## Writing rhythm
+
+Append silently. Don't ask permission for each fragment. Mention what you added in passing ("adding that"), but don't interrupt the conversation with save dialogs.
+
+Before every write: re-read the file from disk. The user may have edited, reordered, or deleted fragments between turns, so preserve their changes. Never overwrite the file; only append (or, if the user asks, edit a specific fragment in place).
+
+The user can say "cut the last one", "rewrite that one sharper", "merge those two" at any time. Treat those as first-class instructions.
+
+</supporting-info>

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-fragments/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+name: stacks-writing-fragments
+description: Writing, explore - mine raw fragments, no structure yet. Covers Stacks engineering workflows.
+disable-model-invocation: true
+license: MIT
+compatibility: Bun >= 1.3.0, TypeScript
+allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Bash Grep Glob
+---
+
+# Writing Fragments
+
+Read [the Stacks adaptation rules](../stacks-flow/ENGINEERING.md), then
+[PLAYBOOK.md](PLAYBOOK.md). The playbook preserves this workflow's decision
+criteria; the Stacks rules govern APIs, tooling, tracking, and authorization.
+
+Credit: adapted from Matt Pocock's `writing-fragments` skill, MIT licensed.
+See [NOTICE.md](NOTICE.md) and [LICENSE](LICENSE).
+
+This source is in upstream's in-progress collection. Use it explicitly as an
+optional workflow; do not install tooling or start background work merely
+because the skill is present.
+
+## Completion
+
+Produce the requested behavior or reviewable artifact and satisfy the
+playbook's completion criteria. Preserve existing decisions and user edits.
+Use the native Stacks skills for implementation and verification, and carry
+existing authorization through the workflow.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-shape/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2026 Matt Pocock
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-shape/NOTICE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Source and license
+
+The upstream MIT notice is preserved in [LICENSE](LICENSE).
+
+## writing-shape
+
+Source: [skills/in-progress/writing-shape/SKILL.md](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills/blob/49dd158d1076134a641b33efb035946536778336/skills/in-progress/writing-shape/SKILL.md),
+revision `49dd158d1076134a641b33efb035946536778336`. This workflow is in progress upstream.
+
+Ported with Stacks skill names, canonical guidance, local-tracker fallback, TypeScript/Bun tooling, and conditional external actions.

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-shape/PLAYBOOK.md

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+> Adapted playbook. Read [the Stacks rules](../stacks-flow/ENGINEERING.md) first. Commit, push, publish, and tracker mutations are conditional on the user's authorization.
+
+
+<what-to-do>
+
+The user has passed (or will pass) a markdown file of raw material. Treat it as the input pile: anything from a tidy list of fragments to a wall of unstructured prose to a transcript. The format does not matter. Read it end-to-end before doing anything else.
+
+Then run a shaping session that produces a separate article document. This is **exploit**: the exploring is done, the pile is fixed: commit to a structure and mine the pile to fill it. Do not edit the raw material file: it is read-only to this skill.
+
+If the user did not say where to save the article, ask once and remember the path.
+
+</what-to-do>
+
+<supporting-info>
+
+## The loop
+
+1. **Read the pile.** Read the input file in full. Form a sense of what's in it.
+2. **Establish the prerequisites.** Settle with the user what the reader knows walking in: the concepts that are **grounded** from the start. Everything else must be grounded by a block before a later block can lean on it. See [Grounding](#grounding).
+3. **Draft 2-3 candidate openings.** Each opening should imply a different thesis or angle for the article. Show all of them. Force the user to pick or compose a hybrid. The chosen opening defines what the rest of the article must do.
+4. **Grow paragraph by paragraph.** After the opening lands, ask "given this opening, what does the reader need to hear next?" Pull material from the pile to answer. The next block may only lean on grounded concepts, and grounds new ones as it lands. Argue about the form the next block takes: a paragraph, a list, a table, a callout, a quote, a code block. Each format choice should be deliberate and defensible.
+5. **Append to the article file as you go.** Don't batch. Write each agreed paragraph or block immediately so the user can see the article taking shape.
+6. **Loop step 4 until the article is done.** The user decides when it's done.
+
+## Grounding
+
+Every **concept** has to be **grounded** before a block can lean on it: the reader either walked in knowing it or met it in an earlier block. A block that reaches for an ungrounded concept loses the reader. The unit is the concept, not the word for it: a block can lean on an idea the reader lacks even with no jargon in sight. Where a concept has a name (a **term**), grounding it means landing the idea and the term together.
+
+A concept gets grounded one of two ways:
+
+- **Prerequisite**: grounded before the opening. The reader brings it. Fixed at the start.
+- **Introduced**: a block establishes it, and from then on it's grounded for the rest of the article.
+
+Keep a running list of what's grounded. When you ask "what does the reader need to hear next?", an ungrounded concept the next move needs is itself the answer: ground it first (here or in an earlier block) or you can't make the move. This is the gap-naming of [Pulling from the pile](#pulling-from-the-pile) one level up: there the pile is missing material; here the article is missing a foundation.
+
+The lever is what you make a prerequisite versus what you ground inside the article. Demand too much up front and you shut readers out; ground too much inside and the opening drowns in definitions. Settle it with the user when you establish prerequisites.
+
+## Conversational feel
+
+This is a grilling session inverted. In ideation, the question was "what are you actually noticing?" Here it's "what is this article actually arguing, and in what order does the reader need to hear it?" Push back. Refuse to let weak transitions slide. If a paragraph doesn't earn its place, cut it.
+
+Specific moves to keep using:
+
+- "What does this paragraph do for the reader that the previous one didn't?"
+- "If I cut this, what breaks?"
+- "Is this prose, or should it be a list? Why prose?"
+- "This sentence is doing two jobs: split it or pick one."
+- "The opening promised X. We've drifted to Y. Either re-thread it or change the opening."
+
+## Pulling from the pile
+
+Treat the raw material as a quarry, not a script. Pull a fragment, rework it to fit the surrounding paragraph, and place it. A fragment may be split across multiple paragraphs, merged with another, or paraphrased. The pile's job is to be mined; the article's job is to read as one voice.
+
+If the pile lacks something the article needs, name the gap explicitly: "We need an example here and the pile doesn't have one. Give me one now or we cut this section."
+
+## Format arguments to actually have
+
+When choosing how to render a block, weigh these tradeoffs out loud with the user, not silently:
+
+- **Prose vs. list.** Prose carries argument; lists carry parallel items. If items aren't truly parallel, prose is better. If they are, a list is faster to scan.
+- **Inline vs. callout.** Tips, warnings, and asides go in callouts (`> [!TIP]`, `> [!NOTE]`), but only if they'd genuinely derail the main argument inline. Otherwise leave them inline.
+- **Table vs. repeated structure.** If the same shape repeats 3+ times with the same fields, a table. Otherwise prose with bold leads.
+- **Quote vs. paraphrase.** Quote when the original wording is the point. Paraphrase when only the idea matters.
+- **Code block vs. inline code.** Multi-line, runnable, or illustrative → block. Single token or identifier → inline.
+
+## Writing rhythm
+
+Append to the article file as each block is agreed. Re-read the file from disk before every write: the user may have edited between turns. Never overwrite blindly. If the user wants a paragraph rewritten, edit that specific paragraph in place; leave the rest alone.
+
+## Out of scope
+
+- Mining for new fragments that aren't in the pile (handle gaps as in "Pulling from the pile").
+- Editing the raw material file.
+- Publishing, formatting for a specific platform, or adding frontmatter the user didn't ask for.
+
+</supporting-info>

package/ai/skills/stacks-writing-shape/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+name: stacks-writing-shape
+description: Writing, exploit - shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph. Covers Stacks engineering workflows.
+disable-model-invocation: true
+license: MIT
+compatibility: Bun >= 1.3.0, TypeScript
+allowed-tools: Read Edit Write Bash Grep Glob
+---
+
+# Writing Shape
+
+Read [the Stacks adaptation rules](../stacks-flow/ENGINEERING.md), then
+[PLAYBOOK.md](PLAYBOOK.md). The playbook preserves this workflow's decision
+criteria; the Stacks rules govern APIs, tooling, tracking, and authorization.
+
+Credit: adapted from Matt Pocock's `writing-shape` skill, MIT licensed.
+See [NOTICE.md](NOTICE.md) and [LICENSE](LICENSE).
+
+This source is in upstream's in-progress collection. Use it explicitly as an
+optional workflow; do not install tooling or start background work merely
+because the skill is present.
+
+## Completion
+
+Produce the requested behavior or reviewable artifact and satisfy the
+playbook's completion criteria. Preserve existing decisions and user edits.
+Use the native Stacks skills for implementation and verification, and carry
+existing authorization through the workflow.

package/ide/vscode/package.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "publisher": "Stacks",
   "name": "vscode-stacks",
   "displayName": "Stacks",
-  "version": "0.75.108",
+  "version": "0.75.110",
   "description": "Stacks, built into VS Code: stx templates, pickier linting and formatting, encrypted env files, the dev server preview and every buddy command. No other extensions required.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "funding": "https://github.com/sponsors/chrisbbreuer",

package/package.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "name": "@stacksjs/defaults",
   "type": "module",
   "sideEffects": false,
-  "version": "0.75.108",
+  "version": "0.75.110",
   "repository": {
     "type": "git",
     "url": "git+https://github.com/stacksjs/stacks.git",
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
   "dependencies": {
     "@iconify-json/f7": "^1.2.2",
     "@iconify-json/hugeicons": "^1.2.35",
-    "@stacksjs/mobile": "^0.75.108",
+    "@stacksjs/mobile": "^0.75.110",
     "@stacksjs/sanitizer": "^0.2.422",
     "@xterm/addon-fit": "^0.11.0",
     "@xterm/xterm": "^6.0.0",