@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily 1.0.24 → 1.0.26

package/email.txt

@@ -1,594 +0,0 @@
-SOFT COMMODITY TRADING
-Episode 07 · Tuesday 18 August 2026 · 10 min 15
-
-WASDE and Building a Balance Sheet
-The line nobody measures moves about ten times faster than the crop.
-
-Listen:      https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/@sdelsad/commodity-desk-daily@1.0.20/ep07.mp3
-Read online: https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep07.html
-
-MARKET PULSE
-============
-
-Monday belonged to soybeans, and they took it on demand rather than supply.
-
-Commodity  Contract    Price      Change
-----------------------------------------
-Corn       Sep (CBOT)  465 c/bu      +6¢
-Corn       Dec (CBOT)  489½ c/bu    +6¼¢
-Soybeans   Sep (CBOT)  1201 c/bu   +23¼¢
-Soybeans   Nov (CBOT)  1216 c/bu   +23½¢
-Wheat HRW  Sep (KC)    758¾ c/bu    +4½¢
-
-Monday's session belonged to the soybean complex, which added better than
-1¾%. Chicago soft red wheat was the exception, giving back part of a week in
-which it had gained 35 cents. Kansas City held its bid.
-
-Two things did the buying. China took another 136,000 t of US soybeans. And
-the crop split in two: the northwestern belt is dry, the eastern belt has
-had too much rain. Monday afternoon's condition ratings had corn at 60% good
-to excellent and soybeans at 61%, each a point lower on the week, with
-soybeans seven points below where they stood a year ago. Corn is 76% at
-dough and 4% mature, running ahead of the five-year average. The bean crop
-is 85% setting pods.
-
-The geopolitical read: the buyer's clock. Chinese purchases of new-crop US
-soybeans have been running far ahead of anything that has actually sailed.
-Vessel data through late July put US-to-China departures at roughly 11,000
-t/day on a seven-day average — close to nothing against commitments running
-into the millions of tonnes. That gap is an instrument, not an accident. A
-commitment is a promise on a balance sheet. A loading is a fact on a vessel.
-The buyer decides when one becomes the other, and that timing is worth more
-than the price paid. It also lands on exactly one line of today's subject.
-
-[chart] Corn led the week, beans closed on Monday — Both jumped on the 12
-        August WASDE and neither gave it back. Corn has led since the
-        report, but Monday belonged to beans, which added 2.0% against
-        corn's 1.3% on Chinese buying and a dry northwestern belt. — CBOT
-        settlements, 11–17 August 2026, from daily market wraps. —
-        https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-
-        desk-daily/ep07_chart1.png
-
-  * A balance sheet is not a forecast. It is an accounting identity that has
-    to close, and ending stocks is the line that closes it.
-
-  * Production is roughly ten times the size of US corn ending stocks, so a
-    1% error in the crop is a 10% error in the carryout. Work that ratio out
-    for every commodity you trade — it is different for each one.
-
-  * Stocks-to-use maps to price on a curve, not a line. The same two-bushel
-    yield move is worth almost nothing at 15% and an enormous amount at 9%.
-
-  * Feed and residual is a residual inside a residual. When it moves, it is
-    telling you about livestock or telling you the crop was never the size
-    they said it was.
-
-  * Analysts converge on supply and diverge on demand, because supply is
-    surveyed and demand is inferred. That is why pre-report positions live
-    in spreads.
-
-  * The market does not price the yield. It prices the carryout, and area,
-    demand and carry-in can each pay for a bad yield.
-
-Term                   Meaning
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Balance sheet (S&D)    The one-page supply and demand statement for a crop
-                       and a marketing year, which must close
-Marketing year         The crop's own accounting year — September to August
-                       for US corn and soybeans, June to May for US wheat
-Carryout               Ending stocks, spoken as a single word on the desk
-Total supply           Carry-in plus production plus imports, the top block
-                       of the sheet
-Total use              Domestic use plus exports, the bottom block
-Feed and residual      The inferred demand line that absorbs both livestock
-                       feeding and every measurement error in the sheet
-New crop / old crop    The marketing year about to begin versus the one
-                       ending, priced by different contract months
-Trade average          The mean of analysts' pre-report estimates, published
-                       in advance, and therefore what is already in the
-                       price
-Whisper number         The expectation the market actually trades, which can
-                       sit away from the published trade average
-Crop Production        The NASS report published alongside WASDE, carrying
-                       the survey-based yield and area
-Grain Stocks           The quarterly survey of physical inventories, from
-                       which feed and residual is backed out
-NASS                   USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service, the
-                       body that runs the surveys behind the numbers
-Implied disappearance  Use derived by subtraction rather than measurement,
-                       the technique behind the residual lines
-
-
-CONVERSION DRILL 7 OF 12 — MILLIMETRES ↔ INCHES OF RAIN
-=======================================================
-
-Rule: 1 inch = 25.4 mm
-
-Fast method: inches → mm: ×25 (×100 then ÷4). mm → inches: ÷25 (÷100 then
-×4).
-
-  * "1 to 3 inches across the Midwest" → 25 to 75 mm
-
-  * 0.5 inch → 13 mm
-
-  * 40 mm → 1.6 inches
-
-Why it matters: rainfall forecasts drive grain prices, and the two systems
-appear in the same conversation constantly.
-
-
-QUIZ
-====
-
-Q1. Build one. A desk runs its own 2026/27 US corn sheet with carry-in of
-1.945 bn bu, imports of 25 m bu and harvested area of 88.6 m acres, but uses
-its own yield of 179.0 bu/ac. It carries domestic use at 13.100 bn and
-exports at 3.350 bn. Compute production, total supply, ending stocks and
-stocks-to-use. Then compare the percentage gap between the desk's carryout
-and USDA's 1.653 bn with the percentage gap between the two yields, and
-explain the difference.
-
-Q2. The quarterly Grain Stocks survey lands 90 m bu below what the trade had
-modelled, with no change to production or exports. Which line absorbs it,
-what are the two competing stories for why, and how would you use the
-futures curve rather than the flat price to work out which story the market
-believes?
-
-Q3. Going into 12 August the trade carried new-crop corn carryout at roughly
-1.725 bn bu. USDA printed 1.653 bn. December corn rose 20¼¢ on the day and
-closed Monday 17 August at 489½, above its report-day close. Explain why
-"the report was bullish and the market went up" is a lazy reading of those
-three sessions, and state precisely what a trader had to be right about to
-still be paid on Monday.
-
-Q4. Ep 6 said corn's demand curve has steps in it. USDA carries corn exports
-at 3.275 bn bu and domestic use at 13.055 bn. Suppose a rally takes December
-corn from 489½ to 560 c/bu and nothing else changes. Name the two demand
-lines that respond first and the direction each moves. Then explain why a
-balance sheet that leaves demand untouched after a 70-cent rally is
-internally inconsistent.
-
-Q5. Ep 6 taught that a weather premium decays on the calendar rather than on
-the forecast. It is 17 August. Corn is 76% at dough and 4% mature. Soybeans
-are 85% setting pods and rated seven points below last year. A trader wants
-to be long the weather. What is actually left to be long of in each crop,
-which would you rather own, and how does Monday's tape support the answer?
-
-Q6. Ep 4 established that risk passes at loading under FOB, CFR and CIF
-alike. You have sold 60,000 t of beans CFR Qingdao. The vessel is three days
-late arriving after a typhoon diversion, and your buyer's letter of credit
-expires in four days. Separate the voyage risk from the documentary risk,
-say who carries each, and identify which of the two actually threatens your
-P&L.
-
-Q7. Ep 4 priced three days of demurrage at $24,000/day as 11% of a $660k
-margin. Do it in the other unit. A 60,000 t soybean cargo is valued off
-Monday's November board of 1216 c/bu, and demurrage runs three days at
-$26,500/day. Convert the cargo to bushels and dollars, then express the
-demurrage in cents per bushel and as a percentage of cargo value. Why do
-desks insist on the cents-per-bushel version?
-
-Q8 — Conversion drill. Over the weekend an eastern Corn Belt station
-recorded 82 mm of rain, while a western Kansas station is forecast 0.35 inch
-for the week ahead. Convert each figure into the other scale. Then say which
-of the two matters more for the balance sheet that moved this week, and name
-the line it lands on.
-
-
-============================================================================
-                       SOLUTIONS BELOW — ANSWER FIRST                       
-============================================================================
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-SOLUTIONS
-=========
-
-A1. The arithmetic first.
-
-Line             Desk  USDA (Aug)
----------------------------------
-Carry-in        1,945       1,945
-Production     15,859      16,013
-Imports            25          25
-Total supply   17,829      17,983
-Domestic use   13,100      13,055
-Exports         3,350       3,275
-Total use      16,450      16,330
-Ending stocks   1,379       1,653
-Stocks-to-use    8.4%       10.1%
-
-All figures in million bushels. Production is 88.6 × 179.0 = 15,859. (USDA's
-published 16,013 is about 3 m bu above 88.6 × 180.7 — rounding in the
-acreage and yield they print. Worth noticing the first time you try to
-rebuild a published sheet and cannot make it tie.)
-
-Now the comparison the question is really asking for. The yields differ by
-1.7 bu, or 0.94%. The carryouts differ by 274 m bu, or 16.6%. That is a
-factor of roughly eighteen, not ten, and the extra leverage comes from the
-demand side: the desk is carrying 120 m bu more use than USDA. Decomposed,
-the 274 is 154 m of yield-and-rounding and 120 m of demand. The trap the
-question sets is the assumption that a carryout gap is a crop-view gap. Most
-of the time it is half a crop view and half a demand view, and only one of
-those two halves gets discussed on television.
-
-A2. Feed and residual absorbs it, and ending stocks falls 90 m bu — from
-1.653 to 1.563 bn, taking stocks-to-use from 10.1% to 9.6%. Nothing else in
-the sheet is allowed to move, because feed and residual is the line derived
-by subtraction.
-
-The two stories:
-
-  1. Real demand. Livestock ate more than modelled — bigger herds, cheaper
-     corn, better rations. This is a genuine tightening and it should
-     persist into the next quarter.
-
-  2. Phantom supply. The crop was never as big as printed. The stocks survey
-     is measuring physical inventory, so if it comes in light, either use
-     was higher or production was overstated. A production overstatement
-     gets revealed slowly, through the residual, quarter by quarter.
-
-The curve tells you which one the market believes. If the trade takes it as
-real, present demand is tighter now: the nearby month bids relative to the
-deferred, spreads firm, and a carry market flattens or inverts. That is bull
-spreading, and it is a statement about physical availability. If the trade
-takes it as a statistical artefact likely to be revised away, flat price
-wobbles on the headline and the spreads do not move — the curve is saying
-nobody is short of corn today. Flat price reacts to news. Spreads react to
-grain. A move in one without the other is the market telling you how much it
-believes.
-
-A3. The surprise was 72 m bu, not the 159 m bu that the 1.8 bu/ac yield miss
-implies on 88.6 m acres. Half of it was absorbed on the way down the page by
-higher area and higher exports. In stocks-to-use terms the trade went in at
-1,725 ÷ 16,330 ≈ 10.6% and got 10.1% — about half a point of tightening.
-That is what the 20¼¢ paid for, and it is a reasonable price for it.
-
-What happened afterwards was a different trade. Corn did not hold its gain
-and then add another six cents on Monday because of the report. It did so
-because Black Sea export capacity stayed impaired, because the eastern belt
-turned too wet, and because the whole complex was being pulled up by
-soybeans on Chinese demand. None of that was in the WASDE.
-
-So a trader long into the print was paid twice, for two separate reasons,
-and needed to be right about both to still be there on Monday. Being right
-about the report bought about a day. Staying long required an independent
-view on export capacity and August weather. The lazy reading — "bullish
-report, market up" — conflates an event that resolved in ninety seconds with
-a trend that has been running for two weeks. The discipline is to book the
-event P&L, then re-underwrite the position on the trend as a fresh decision.
-
-A4. Exports fall, and the ethanol grind inside domestic use falls. Both are
-price-elastic on a timescale of weeks.
-
-  * Exports are the fastest. US corn competes with Brazilian, Argentine and
-    Ukrainian corn at destination. A 70¢ rally is about $27.50/t; the buyer
-    simply calls another origin. This is ep 5's flow substitution, running
-    on the demand line instead of the supply line.
-
-  * Ethanol grind is a margin, not a preference. The plant buys corn and
-    sells ethanol and distillers grains. Corn up 70¢ with ethanol unchanged
-    compresses the crush, and marginal plants slow down. Demand stops
-    appearing at the bid.
-
-Feed is the third lever but the slowest and, right now, the furthest away:
-ep 6 put Chicago wheat about $54/t above its feed-switch level, so the
-substitution bid is nowhere near being triggered.
-
-The inconsistency is this. A balance sheet is a set of quantities at an
-assumed price. If you tighten stocks and let price rise, you must also let
-the demand lines respond, or you are counting the tightening twice. That
-feedback is why carryout estimates converge rather than diverge: tighter
-stocks lift price, higher price rations demand, rationed demand rebuilds
-stocks. Rationing is not a metaphor — it is the arithmetic by which the
-sheet closes at a higher price. The analyst's edge sits almost entirely in
-how fast and how far they think that response runs.
-
-A5. For corn, very little is left. Pollination determines ear count and it
-is long finished; 76% dough and 4% mature means kernel number is set and the
-crop is filling. What remains is test weight, late-season disease, and an
-early frost risk that is still weeks away and low-probability. The weather
-premium has largely decayed, exactly as ep 6 described, and it decayed
-whether or not the forecast improved.
-
-For soybeans, the crop is genuinely still open. Beans set pods and fill seed
-through August, so August rainfall and August heat still move the yield.
-With 85% setting pods, a rating of 61% good to excellent and seven points of
-deterioration against last year, there is a real distribution left to price.
-
-You would rather own the beans — and Monday's tape is the evidence: beans
-+23½¢ against corn +6¼¢ on the same weather map. The sharper version of the
-answer is that you would rather own optionality on beans than futures,
-because the same decay clock that has already emptied the corn premium is
-running on the bean premium too, and it accelerates from early September. A
-long call spread pays for the distribution without paying carry to the
-calendar.
-
-A6. Two different risks, and the question is whether you can tell them apart
-under pressure.
-
-  * Voyage risk passed to the buyer at the ship's rail in Santos. A typhoon
-    diversion mid-ocean is the buyer's risk of loss, not yours. Under CFR
-    you contracted the freight, so a late vessel is your dispute with the
-    carrier under the charter party — but it does not move cargo risk back
-    onto your book.
-
-  * Documentary risk is entirely yours, and it is the live one. A letter of
-    credit is a bank's undertaking to pay against conforming documents
-    presented before expiry. Miss the expiry and the undertaking lapses. You
-    are then an unsecured creditor of the buyer, holding a cargo already at
-    their risk, in a market where they may prefer to renegotiate.
-
-The documentary risk is what threatens the P&L. Nothing has happened to the
-beans. The practical moves are to request an L/C amendment extending expiry
-and the latest shipment date before it lapses rather than after, to present
-documents early if the bill of lading and quality certificate are already in
-hand, or to ship documents against a letter of indemnity if originals are
-chasing the vessel. Ep 4's point restated: the cargo is fine, and the paper
-is what pays.
-
-A7. Convert first. 60,000 t × 36.744 bu/t = 2,204,640 bu. At 1216 c/bu the
-cargo is worth $26.81 m.
-
-Line                                  Value
--------------------------------------------
-Cargo                          2,204,640 bu
-Cargo value at 1216 c/bu        $26,808,422
-Demurrage, 3 days × $26,500         $79,500
-Demurrage in c/bu                  3.6 c/bu
-Demurrage as % of cargo value         0.30%
-
-Desks quote it in cents per bushel because that is the same unit as the
-margin. A cargo bought at "November minus 20" and hit with 3.6 cents of
-demurrage was really bought at minus 23.6. In dollars, $79,500 against $26.8
-m looks like a rounding error and gets waved through. In cents per bushel it
-sits next to the differential that the entire trade was argued over, and 3.6
-cents is a fifth of the twenty. Execution costs only become visible when
-they are expressed in the unit the trader negotiates in — which is why the
-execution desk reports in cents, not in invoices.
-
-A8 — Conversion drill answer. 82 mm ÷ 25.4 = 3.23 inches. 0.35 inch × 25.4 =
-8.9 mm. The fast method gets you close enough to trade on: 82 ÷ 100 × 4 =
-3.28, and 0.35 × 100 ÷ 4 = 8.75.
-
-The 82 mm is the number that matters this week. Excessive rain across the
-eastern Corn Belt in mid-August, with corn 76% at dough and beans 85%
-setting pods, brings lodging and disease pressure into crops that are
-filling, and it is behind the one-point slip in both condition ratings on
-Monday. It lands on the yield term of production, on the supply side of the
-2026/27 sheet.
-
-The 8.9 mm in western Kansas is a soil-moisture story for hard red winter
-seeding in September. It reaches a balance sheet too — but the 2027/28 one,
-through planted area and abandonment. Same week, two rainfall figures, two
-different marketing years. Keeping them apart is most of the skill.
-
-
-THE EPISODE, IN WRITING
-=======================
-
-
-
-The object every grain desk argues about
-----------------------------------------
-
-A balance sheet is one page. Supply on top, demand underneath, and what is
-left over at the bottom. It is not a forecast and it is not a model. It is
-an accounting identity, and it has to close.
-
-Supply is three lines.
-
-Line        What it is
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Carry-in    What was still in store when the previous marketing year ended
-Production  Harvested acres × yield per harvested acre
-Imports     For US corn, a rounding error
-
-Two things in that table are quietly load-bearing. A marketing year is the
-crop's own calendar, not the accountant's: US corn and soybeans run
-September to August, US wheat June to May. And production uses harvested
-acres, not planted. Around 8 million planted US corn acres never get cut for
-grain in a normal year.
-
-Demand is four lines: feed and residual, ethanol, food/seed/industrial, and
-exports. Then ending stocks, which is total supply minus total use.
-
-Ending stocks is not measured. It is what is left.
-
-Building the real one
----------------------
-
-The August numbers, in million bushels.
-
-                                      2026/27 US corn
------------------------------------------------------
-Carry-in                                        1,945
-Production (88.6 m ac × 180.7 bu/ac)           16,013
-Imports                                            25
-Total supply                                   17,983
-Domestic use                                   13,055
-Exports                                         3,275
-Total use                                      16,330
-Ending stocks                                   1,653
-Stocks-to-use                                   10.1%
-
-[chart] US corn 2026/27, supply down to carryout — Ending stocks is the
-        difference between two numbers that are both around sixteen billion.
-        That is what makes it move so much. — USDA WASDE, 12 August 2026.
-        Carry-in is the figure implied by the published stocks and use. —
-        https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-
-        desk-daily/ep07_chart2.png
-
-Stocks-to-use is the number a desk quotes out loud, because a bushel figure
-means nothing without the size of the market next to it. 1,653 over 16,330
-is 10.1%.
-
-Why the bottom line is a lever
-------------------------------
-
-Look at the size of the terms. Production is 16.0 billion bushels. Ending
-stocks is 1.65 billion. Production is roughly ten times the line it feeds.
-
-So a 1% error in the crop is a 10% error in the carryout.
-
-Take the yield down two bushels, from 180.7 to 178.7. That is 1.1% on the
-yield line. On 88.6 million harvested acres it is 177 million bushels of
-production.
-
-Yield (bu/ac)  Production  Ending stocks  Stocks-to-use
--------------------------------------------------------
-178.7              15,836          1,476           9.0%
-180.7 (USDA)       16,013          1,653          10.1%
-182.7              16,190          1,830          11.2%
-
-[chart] Two bushels of yield, eleven percent of carryout — A 1.1% change in
-        the yield input moves ending stocks by about 11% in either
-        direction. The balance sheet is a lever, and the fulcrum sits very
-        close to the crop. — Calculated on the August 2026 WASDE sheet,
-        holding demand and area constant at 88.6 m harvested acres. —
-        https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-
-        desk-daily/ep07_chart3.png
-
-Eleven percent either way, out of a one percent input. That is the whole
-reason a yield estimate is worth arguing about for six weeks.
-
-A warning about that table, though. It holds demand fixed, and a real
-balance sheet does not. A sheet is a set of quantities at an assumed price.
-Cut the crop, lift the price, and exports and ethanol grind both start to
-fall — which rebuilds part of the stocks you just removed. Rationing is not
-a metaphor. It is the arithmetic by which the sheet closes at a higher
-price.
-
-Stocks-to-use bends
--------------------
-
-The relationship between stocks-to-use and price is not a line. It is a
-curve, and it bends.
-
-From 15% down to 12%, price barely notices. There is plenty of corn either
-way and the marginal bushel is not scarce. From 10% down to 8%, price goes
-vertical, because at that level somebody has to be rationed out of the
-market and price is the only tool that does it.
-
-Which means the same two-bushel yield move is worth almost nothing at a
-comfortable stocks-to-use and an enormous amount at a tight one. At 10.1%,
-corn is close enough to the bend that the market is paying attention — and
-that, rather than the headline figure, is why an August yield print gets
-traded as hard as it does.
-
-The line that hides the sins
-----------------------------
-
-Feed and residual. Two words, and the second is doing real work.
-
-Nobody counts the corn a hog eats. Feed use is inferred: take the quarterly
-Grain Stocks survey, subtract everything that can actually be measured, and
-whatever remains gets called feed and residual. So every measurement error
-in the sheet — in production, in exports, in the survey itself — lands in
-that one line.
-
-Which means that when feed and residual moves, sometimes it is telling you
-about livestock, and sometimes it is telling you the crop was never the size
-they said it was.
-
-Ending stocks is a residual. Feed and residual is a residual sitting inside
-it.
-
-Where analysts actually disagree
---------------------------------
-
-Here is what the argument sounds like the morning before a report.
-
-  | Analyst: I have got carryout at one six eight.
-
-  | Trader: On what yield?
-
-  | Analyst: One eighty-one. Same as theirs.
-
-  | Trader: Then where are we actually different?
-
-  | Analyst: Exports. You are carrying three three, I am at three two.
-
-  | Trader: A hundred million bushels of Mexico. That is not a crop view,
-  | that is a freight view.
-
-Notice where the disagreement sat. Not the yield — they agreed on the yield.
-
-That is the pattern, and it has a structural cause. Supply is surveyed.
-Fields are walked, ears are counted, acres are measured from satellite
-imagery and from farm programme filings. Two analysts working from the same
-surveys land close together.
-
-Demand is inferred. Nobody surveys a feedlot's intentions. Export
-commitments are known, but shipment timing is a decision somebody else has
-not made yet — which is precisely what the Chinese soybean programme is
-demonstrating this month.
-
-So two competent analysts converge on supply and diverge on demand. Which is
-why the interesting positions ahead of a report are rarely outright: a
-demand view is a view about when and where, and that lives in spreads.
-
-Trading the surprise, not the number
-------------------------------------
-
-On 12 August USDA cut the corn yield to 180.7 bu/ac. The trade average going
-in was 182.5. So the yield surprise was 1.8 bushels — 159 million bushels of
-production, gone.
-
-And the carryout printed only about 72 million below what the trade was
-carrying.
-
-Line                                    Effect
--------------------------------------------------
-Yield surprise, −1.8 bu/ac × 88.6 m ac  −159 m bu
-Area and demand revisions               +87 m bu
-Carryout surprise                       −72 m bu
-
-Half the surprise disappeared on the way down the page. This is the trap
-that catches anyone who trades one line: the market does not price the
-yield, it prices the carryout, and the carryout has an area term, a demand
-term and a carry-in term, any of which can pay for a bad yield.
-
-December corn added roughly 20¼¢ on the print. It then did not hand it back
-— it closed Monday 17 August at 489½, above its report-day close. But that
-was a different trade. The follow-through came from impaired Black Sea
-export capacity, a soaked eastern belt and a soybean complex pulling the
-whole board higher on Chinese buying. None of it was in the report.
-
-Which is the last honest thing to say about report days. The number is the
-shock. The market is what happens over the next three weeks, and it needs
-its own reason.
-
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Soft Commodity Trading — a daily briefing on physical commodity trading.
-
-GLOSSARY
-Every unit and expression the show has introduced lives on the episode page:
-https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/ep07.html#glossary
-
-All episodes: https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/index.html
-RSS: https://storage.googleapis.com/podcast-audio-2647223968/commodity-desk-daily/feed.xml