@rune-kit/rune 2.10.0 → 2.12.0

package/skills/debug/SKILL.md

@@ -1,465 +1,465 @@
----
-name: debug
-description: Root cause analysis for bugs and unexpected behavior. Traces errors through code, uses structured reasoning, and hands off to fix when cause is found. Core of the debug↔fix mesh.
-metadata:
-  author: runedev
-  version: "1.1.0"
-  layer: L2
-  model: sonnet
-  group: development
-  tools: "Read, Bash, Glob, Grep"
-  emit: bug.diagnosed
-  listen: tests.failed
----
-
-# debug
-
-## Purpose
-
-Root cause analysis ONLY. Debug investigates — it does NOT fix. It traces errors through code, analyzes stack traces, forms and tests hypotheses, and identifies the exact cause before handing off to rune:fix.
-
-<HARD-GATE>
-Do NOT fix the code. Debug investigates only. Any code change is out of scope.
-If root cause cannot be identified after 3 hypothesis cycles:
-- Escalate to `rune:problem-solver` for structured 5-Whys or Fishbone analysis
-- Or escalate to `rune:sequential-thinking` for multi-variable analysis
-- Report escalation in the Debug Report with all evidence gathered so far
-</HARD-GATE>
-
-## Triggers
-
-- Called by `cook` when implementation hits unexpected errors
-- Called by `test` when a test fails with unclear reason
-- Called by `fix` when root cause is unclear before fixing
-- `/rune debug <issue>` — manual debugging
-- Auto-trigger: when error output contains stack trace or error code
-
-## Calls (outbound)
-
-- `scout` (L2): find related code, trace imports, identify affected modules
-- `fix` (L2): when root cause found, hand off with diagnosis for fix application
-- `brainstorm` (L2): 3-Fix Escalation when root cause is "wrong approach" — invoke with mode="rescue" for category-diverse alternatives
-- `plan` (L2): 3-Fix Escalation when root cause is "wrong module design" — invoke for redesign
-- `docs-seeker` (L3): lookup API docs for unclear errors or deprecated APIs
-- `problem-solver` (L3): structured reasoning (5 Whys, Fishbone) for complex bugs
-- `browser-pilot` (L3): capture browser console errors, network failures, visual bugs
-- `sequential-thinking` (L3): multi-variable root cause analysis
-- `neural-memory` (L3): after root cause found — capture error pattern for future recognition
-
-## Called By (inbound)
-
-- `cook` (L1): implementation hits bug during Phase 4
-- `fix` (L2): root cause unclear, can't fix blindly — needs diagnosis first
-- `test` (L2): test fails unexpectedly, unclear why
-- `surgeon` (L2): diagnose issues in legacy modules
-
-## Cross-Hub Connections
-
-- `debug` ↔ `fix` — bidirectional: debug finds cause → fix applies, fix can't determine cause → debug investigates
-- `debug` ← `test` — test fails → debug investigates
-
-## Execution
-
-### Step 1: Reproduce
-
-Understand and confirm the error described in the request.
-
-- Read the error message, stack trace, and reproduction steps
-- Identify which environment it occurs in (dev/prod, browser/server)
-- Confirm the error is consistent and reproducible before proceeding
-- If no reproduction steps provided, ask for them or attempt the most likely path
-
-### Step 1.5: Scope Lock (Edit Boundary)
-
-After reproducing the error, **lock edits to the narrowest affected directory** to prevent debug-driven scope creep — the #1 source of "while I'm here, let me also fix..." violations.
-
-1. Identify the narrowest directory containing the affected files (from stack trace or error location)
-2. Announce to user: "Debug scope locked to `<dir>/`. Changes will be restricted to this area."
-3. Any fix recommendation in the Debug Report MUST reference only files within this boundary
-4. If root cause traces outside the boundary → expand scope with user confirmation first
-
-**Skip conditions** (do NOT lock):
-- Bug spans the entire repo (3+ unrelated directories in stack trace)
-- Cannot determine affected area from initial evidence
-- User explicitly says "investigate everything"
-
-**Why:** Debugging naturally expands scope as you trace root causes. Without a boundary, rune:fix receives recommendations touching 10+ files across unrelated modules. The scope lock forces discipline: fix at the source, not at every symptom site.
-
-
-### Step 2: Gather Evidence
-
-Use tools to collect facts — do NOT guess yet.
-
-- Use `Grep` to search codebase for the exact error string or related error codes
-- Use `Read` to examine stack trace files, log files, or the specific file:line mentioned
-- Use `Glob` to find related files (config, types, tests) that may be involved
-- Use `rune:browser-pilot` if the issue is UI-related (console errors, network failures, visual bugs)
-- Use `rune:scout` to trace imports and identify all modules touched by the affected code path
-
-#### Backward Tracing (for deep stack errors)
-
-When the error appears deep in execution (wrong directory, wrong path, wrong value):
-
-1. **Observe symptom** — what's the exact error and where does it appear?
-2. **Find immediate cause** — what code directly triggers this? Read that file:line
-3. **What called this?** — trace one level up. What value was passed? By whom?
-4. **Keep tracing up** — repeat until you find where the bad value ORIGINATES
-5. **Fix at source** — the root cause is where invalid data is CREATED, not where it CRASHES
-
-Rule: NEVER fix where the error appears. Trace back to where invalid data originated.
-
-#### Instrumentation Tip: Use console.error, Not Loggers
-When adding diagnostic instrumentation, use `console.error()` (stderr) — NOT application loggers. Loggers are configured to suppress output based on log level or environment (e.g., `LOG_LEVEL=warn` silences `logger.debug`). `console.error` bypasses all logger configuration and writes directly to stderr. This is counterintuitive but critical — the one time you NEED debug output is exactly when loggers are configured to hide it.
-
-#### Defense-in-Depth (After Root Cause Found)
-When the root cause is invalid data flowing through multiple layers, recommend fixing at ALL layers — not just the source:
-
-| Layer | Purpose | Example |
-|-------|---------|---------|
-| Layer 1: Entry Point | Reject invalid input at API/CLI boundary | Validate not empty, exists, correct type |
-| Layer 2: Business Logic | Ensure data makes sense for the operation | Validate required params before processing |
-| Layer 3: Environment Guards | Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts | Refuse destructive ops outside allowed dirs |
-| Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation | Capture context for forensics | Stack trace logging before dangerous operations |
-
-All four layers are necessary. During testing, each layer catches bugs the others miss — different code paths bypass single validation points. When recommending a fix via `rune:fix`, explicitly call out which layers need validation added.
-
-#### Multi-Component Instrumentation (for systems with 3+ layers)
-
-When the system has multiple components (CI → build → deploy, API → service → DB):
-
-Before hypothesizing, add diagnostic logging at EACH component boundary:
-- Log what data ENTERS each component
-- Log what data EXITS each component
-- Verify environment/config propagation across boundaries
-- Run once → analyze logs → identify WHICH boundary fails → THEN hypothesize
-
-This reveals: "secrets reach workflow ✓, workflow reaches build ✗" — pinpoints the failing layer.
-
-### Step 2b: Instrument with Preserved Markers
-
-When adding diagnostic logging or instrumentation during investigation, mark ALL additions with region markers:
-
-```
-// #region agent-debug — [hypothesis being tested]
-console.log('[DEBUG] value at boundary:', data);
-// #endregion agent-debug
-```
-
-Language-appropriate equivalents:
-- Python: `# region agent-debug` / `# endregion agent-debug`
-- Rust: `// region agent-debug` / `// endregion agent-debug`
-
-**Why preserved markers matter:**
-- `rune:fix` will preserve these markers until the bug is fully resolved and tests pass
-- If the bug recurs, markers show exactly what was previously instrumented
-- Cleaning up debug traces before the fix is verified prevents learning from failure history
-- After fix is verified + tests pass → fix will clean up markers in a final pass
-
-<HARD-GATE>
-ALL diagnostic code added during debug MUST be wrapped in `#region agent-debug` markers.
-Unmarked instrumentation will be treated as stray code and removed prematurely.
-</HARD-GATE>
-
-### Step 2c: Check Debug Knowledge Base
-
-Before forming hypotheses, check `.rune/debug/knowledge-base.md`:
-- If file exists → search for matching symptoms/error messages
-- If match found → try known fix FIRST, skip hypothesis cycle
-- If no match → proceed to Step 3
-
-After successful root cause identification (Step 5), append entry:
-```
-### [date] — [symptom summary]
-- **Symptom**: [error message or behavior]
-- **Root Cause**: [what was actually wrong]
-- **Fix**: [what resolved it]
-- **Files**: [affected files]
-```
-
-This prevents re-debugging the same issue across sessions.
-
-### Step 2d: Known Error Pattern Matching
-
-Before forming hypotheses, match the error against common **error archetypes**. If a match is found, skip directly to the known fix approach — no hypothesis cycling needed.
-
-**Error Pattern Catalog**:
-
-| Pattern ID | Detection (Error Type + Keywords) | Root Cause | Recovery Hint |
-|------------|----------------------------------|------------|---------------|
-| `STATELESS_LOSS` | `NameError` / `ReferenceError` + variable defined in previous step | Execution context doesn't persist between tool calls | "Combine all variable definitions and usage in a single code block" |
-| `MODULE_NOT_FOUND` | `ModuleNotFoundError` / `Cannot find module` | Dependency not installed or wrong import path | "Check package.json/requirements.txt. Install missing dep, then retry" |
-| `TYPE_MISMATCH` | `TypeError` + "undefined is not a function" / "has no attribute" | Wrong type passed through chain — object where primitive expected or vice versa | "Trace the value backward: where was it created? What type was intended?" |
-| `ASYNC_DEADLOCK` | `TimeoutError` / `Promise` + hang / `await` missing | Async/await misuse — missing await, blocking in async, unresolved promise | "Check: missing await? Blocking call in async context? Unresolved promise chain?" |
-| `PATH_MISMATCH` | `ENOENT` / `FileNotFoundError` + path string in error | Relative vs absolute path, or CWD differs from expected | "Print resolved path. Check CWD. Use path.resolve() or Path.resolve()" |
-| `ENCODING_ISSUE` | `UnicodeDecodeError` / `SyntaxError` + quotes/special chars | Non-ASCII characters in code or data (curly quotes, BOM, etc.) | "Check for smart quotes, BOM markers, or non-ASCII in the file. Use `file` command to check encoding" |
-| `ENV_MISSING` | `KeyError` / "undefined" + env var name | Environment variable not set or .env not loaded | "Check .env file exists and is loaded. Verify var name matches exactly (case-sensitive)" |
-| `CIRCULAR_IMPORT` | `ImportError` + "partially initialized" / "circular" | Module A imports B imports A | "Restructure: move shared types to a third module, or use lazy imports" |
-
-**Matching rules**:
-- Match on error type + 2+ keywords from the Detection column
-- If matched: report the pattern ID and recovery hint in the Debug Report, then proceed to test the known fix approach as H1 (highest priority hypothesis)
-- If NOT matched: proceed to Step 3 (form hypotheses from scratch)
-
-**Error fingerprinting**: When comparing errors across hypothesis cycles, normalize these elements before comparison:
-- Line numbers → `<LINE>`
-- File paths → `<PATH>`
-- Variable/function names → `<IDENT>`
-- Timestamps → `<TIME>`
-
-Two errors with the same fingerprint after normalization are the SAME error — don't re-investigate, the previous hypothesis result still applies.
-
-**Catalog growth**: After each successful debug (Step 5), check: does this error pattern match any existing catalog entry? If not, and the root cause is generalizable (not project-specific), suggest adding it to the catalog via a note in the Debug Report: "New pattern candidate: [pattern] — consider adding to error catalog."
-
-### Step 3: Form Hypotheses
-
-List exactly 2-3 possible root causes — no more, no fewer.
-
-- Each hypothesis must be specific (name the file, function, or line if possible)
-- Order by likelihood (most likely first)
-- Format:
-  - H1: [specific hypothesis — file/function/pattern]
-  - H2: [specific hypothesis]
-  - H3: [specific hypothesis]
-
-### Step 4: Test Hypotheses
-
-Test each hypothesis systematically using tools.
-
-- Use `Read` to inspect the suspected file/function for each hypothesis
-- Use `Bash` to run targeted tests: a single failing test, a type check, a linter on the file
-- Use `rune:browser-pilot` for UI hypotheses (inspect DOM, network, console)
-- For each hypothesis: mark CONFIRMED / RULED OUT with evidence
-- If all 3 hypotheses are ruled out → go back to Step 2 to gather more evidence
-- Maximum 3 hypothesis cycles. If still unresolved after 3 cycles → escalate (see Hard-Gate)
-
-### Step 5: Identify Root Cause
-
-Narrow to the single actual cause.
-
-- State the confirmed hypothesis and the exact evidence that proves it
-- Identify the specific file, line number, and code construct responsible
-- Note any contributing factors (environment, data, timing, config)
-
-### Step 5b: Capture Error Pattern
-
-Call `neural-memory` (Capture Mode) to save the error pattern: root cause, symptoms, and fix approach. Tag with [project-name, error, technology].
-
-### Step 6: 3-Fix Escalation Rule
-
-<HARD-GATE>
-If the SAME bug has been "fixed" 3 times and keeps returning:
-1. STOP fixing. The bug is not the problem — the ARCHITECTURE is.
-2. **Classify the failure**:
-   - **Same category of blocker each time** (e.g., API doesn't support X, platform limitation) → the APPROACH is wrong, not just the code
-   - **Different bugs each time** (e.g., race condition, then null pointer, then type error) → the MODULE needs redesign
-3. **Route based on classification**:
-   - Approach is wrong → Escalate to `rune:brainstorm(mode="rescue")` for category-diverse alternatives
-   - Module needs redesign → Escalate to `rune:plan` for redesign of the affected module
-4. Report all 3 fix attempts and why each failed in the escalation.
-"Try a 4th fix" is NOT acceptable. After 3 failures, question the design OR the approach.
-</HARD-GATE>
-
-Track fix attempts in the Debug Report. If this is attempt N>1 for the same symptom:
-- Reference previous fix attempts and their outcomes
-- Explain why the previous fix didn't hold
-- If N=3: trigger the escalation gate above — classify and route accordingly
-
-### 3+ Fixes as Architectural Signal
-
-> From superpowers (obra/superpowers, 84k★): "Each fix revealing new problems elsewhere = structural issue, not a bug hunt."
-
-When 3+ **distinct** fixes fail (not retries of the same fix), STOP treating it as a bug:
-
-| Signal | Interpretation | Next Step |
-|--------|---------------|-----------|
-| Same blocker each time (API limit, platform gap) | Wrong approach | `brainstorm(mode="rescue")` — need fundamentally different path |
-| Different bugs each fix (null → race → type) | Wrong architecture | `plan` redesign — module has structural problems |
-| Each fix creates a new bug elsewhere | Tight coupling | The module boundary is wrong — need to redraw boundaries before fixing |
-| Fix works locally but fails in integration | Missing contract | Cross-module interface is undefined — add explicit contracts first |
-
-**Key insight**: After 3 failures, question the DESIGN, not the CODE. "Try harder" is never the right answer at this point.
-
-### Step 7: Report
-
-Produce structured output and hand off to rune:fix.
-
-- Write the Debug Report (see Output Format below)
-- Call `rune:fix` with the full report if fix is needed
-- Do NOT apply any code changes — report only
-
-## Analysis Paralysis Guard
-
-<HARD-GATE>
-Debug is read-heavy by nature — but there are limits.
-
-After Step 4 (Test Hypotheses): if NO hypothesis is confirmed after 3 cycles of Steps 2-4, you MUST stop and escalate. Do NOT start cycle 4. Report all evidence gathered and escalate to problem-solver or sequential-thinking.
-
-Within any single step: 5+ consecutive Read/Grep calls without forming or testing a hypothesis = stuck. Stop reading, form a hypothesis from what you have, and test it. Incomplete hypotheses that get tested are better than perfect hypotheses that never form.
-</HARD-GATE>
-
-### Hash-Based Evidence Loop Detection
-
-Beyond counting reads, detect when debug is **re-gathering the same evidence without progress** — the most common debug-specific stuck pattern.
-
-**Detection signals** (track mentally across hypothesis cycles):
-
-| Signal | Count | Meaning | Action |
-|--------|-------|---------|--------|
-| Reading the same file:line range in different cycles | 2x | Re-examining without new lens | Form hypothesis from existing evidence NOW |
-| Running the same test command with same failure output | 3x | No code changed between runs | STOP — hand off to fix with current diagnosis, even if incomplete |
-| Grepping the same error string after already finding all occurrences | 2x | Hoping for different results | Evidence is complete — move to Step 3 (hypothesize) |
-| Same hypothesis tested with same evidence across cycles | 2x | Circular reasoning | Mark hypothesis INCONCLUSIVE, try a DIFFERENT hypothesis category |
-
-**Hypothesis category diversity rule**: If H1 (cycle 1) was "wrong input data" and it was RULED OUT, H1 (cycle 2) MUST be from a DIFFERENT category:
-
-| Category | Examples |
-|----------|---------|
-| Data | Wrong value, missing field, type mismatch, encoding |
-| Control Flow | Wrong branch, missing guard, race condition, async ordering |
-| Environment | Wrong config, missing env var, version mismatch, path issue |
-| State | Stale cache, mutation side-effect, leaked reference, dangling connection |
-
-
-## Red Flags — STOP and Return to Step 2
-
-If you catch yourself thinking any of these, you are GUESSING, not debugging:
-
-- "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
-- "Just try changing X and see if it works"
-- "It's probably X, let me fix that"
-- "I don't fully understand but this might work"
-- "Here are the main problems: [lists fixes without investigation]"
-- Proposing solutions before tracing data flow
-- "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)
-- "Let me read one more file before forming a hypothesis" (after 5+ reads)
-
-ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Step 2 (Gather Evidence).
-
-## Constraints
-
-1. MUST NOT apply any code changes — debug investigates only, fix applies
-2. MUST reproduce the error before forming hypotheses — no guessing from error messages alone
-3. MUST gather evidence (file reads, grep, stack traces) before hypothesizing
-4. MUST form exactly 2-3 hypotheses, ordered by likelihood — no more, no fewer
-5. MUST mark each hypothesis CONFIRMED or RULED OUT with specific evidence
-6. MUST NOT exceed 3 hypothesis cycles — escalate to problem-solver or sequential-thinking
-7. MUST NOT say "I know what's wrong" without citing file:line evidence
-8. For deep stack errors: MUST use backward tracing (Step 2) — never fix at the crash site
-9. For multi-component systems: MUST instrument boundaries before hypothesizing
-
-## Output Format
-
-```
-## Debug Report
-- **Error**: [error message]
-- **Status**: DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | NEEDS_CONTEXT | BLOCKED
-- **Severity**: critical | high | medium | low
-- **Confidence**: high | medium | low
-- **Fix Attempt**: [1/2/3 — track recurring bugs]
-
-### Root Cause
-[Detailed explanation of what's causing the error]
-
-### Location
-- `path/to/file.ts:42` — [description of the problematic code]
-
-### Evidence
-1. [observation supporting diagnosis]
-2. [observation supporting diagnosis]
-
-### Previous Fix Attempts (if any)
-- Attempt 1: [what was tried] → [why it didn't hold]
-- Attempt 2: [what was tried] → [why it didn't hold]
-
-### Concerns (if DONE_WITH_CONCERNS)
-- [concern]: [impact assessment] — [suggested remediation]
-
-### Context Needed (if NEEDS_CONTEXT)
-- [what is unknown]: [why it blocks diagnosis] — [two most likely answers]
-
-### Suggested Fix
-[Description of what needs to change — no code, just direction]
-[If attempt 3: "ESCALATION: 3-fix rule triggered. Recommending redesign via rune:plan."]
-
-### Related Code
-- `path/to/related.ts` — [why it's relevant]
-```
-
-### Status Protocol (Subagent Contract)
-
-Debug returns one of four statuses to its caller (cook, fix, test, surgeon). The caller uses this to route next actions.
-
-| Status | When | Example |
-|--------|------|---------|
-| `DONE` | Root cause identified with high confidence, ready for fix | Clear diagnosis with file:line evidence |
-| `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS` | Root cause found but diagnosis has caveats | "Likely race condition but cannot reproduce consistently — fix may need retry logic" |
-| `NEEDS_CONTEXT` | Cannot diagnose without more info — missing repro steps, env details, or access | "Error only occurs in production — need prod logs or env variables to continue" |
-| `BLOCKED` | Exhausted 3 hypothesis cycles, escalation triggered | "3 cycles completed, no confirmed root cause — escalating to problem-solver" |
-
-## Returns
-
-| Artifact | Format | Location |
-|----------|--------|----------|
-| Debug Report | Markdown (inline) | Emitted to calling skill (cook, fix, test, surgeon) |
-| Root cause + location | Inline (Debug Report) | Specific file:line with evidence |
-| Fix recommendation | Inline (Debug Report) | Direction only — no code changes |
-| Debug knowledge base entry | Markdown | `.rune/debug/knowledge-base.md` (appended on success) |
-
-## Chain Metadata
-
-Append to Debug Report when invoked standalone. Suppress when called as sub-skill inside an L1 orchestrator (cook, team, etc.) — the orchestrator emits a consolidated block. See `docs/references/chain-metadata.md`.
-
-```yaml
-chain_metadata:
-  skill: "rune:debug"
-  version: "1.1.0"
-  status: "[DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | NEEDS_CONTEXT | BLOCKED]"
-  domain: "[area debugged]"
-  files_changed: []  # debug never changes files
-  exports:
-    root_cause: { file: "[path]", line: [N], explanation: "[cause]" }
-    severity: "[critical | high | medium | low]"
-    confidence: "[high | medium | low]"
-    fix_recommendation: "[direction for fix skill]"
-  suggested_next:
-    - skill: "rune:fix"
-      reason: "[grounded in root cause — e.g., 'Critical race condition found in auth.ts:42']"
-      consumes: ["root_cause", "fix_recommendation"]
-```
-
-## Sharp Edges
-
-| Failure Mode | Severity | Mitigation |
-|---|---|---|
-| Forming hypothesis from error message alone without evidence | HIGH | Evidence-first rule: read files and grep logs BEFORE hypothesizing |
-| Modifying code while "investigating" | CRITICAL | HARD-GATE: any code change during debug = out of scope — hand off to fix |
-| Marking hypothesis CONFIRMED without file:line proof | HIGH | CONFIRMED requires specific evidence cited — "it makes sense" is not evidence |
-| Exceeding 3 hypothesis cycles without escalation | MEDIUM | After 3 cycles: escalate to rune:problem-solver or rune:sequential-thinking |
-| Same bug "fixed" 3+ times without questioning architecture | CRITICAL | 3-Fix Escalation Rule: classify failure → same blocker category = brainstorm(rescue), different bugs = plan redesign |
-| Escalating to plan when the APPROACH is wrong (not the module) | HIGH | If all 3 fixes hit the same category of blocker (API limit, platform gap), the approach needs pivoting via brainstorm(rescue), not re-planning |
-| Not tracking fix attempt number for recurring bugs | HIGH | Debug Report MUST include Fix Attempt counter — enables escalation gate |
-| Adding instrumentation without region markers | MEDIUM | All debug logging MUST use `#region agent-debug` — unmarked code gets cleaned up prematurely by fix |
-| Re-reading same file:line in different hypothesis cycles | HIGH | Hash-based evidence loop: if same evidence gathered 2x, form hypothesis from existing data — don't re-gather |
-| Same hypothesis category across cycles after RULED OUT | HIGH | Hypothesis category diversity: if "data" ruled out in cycle 1, cycle 2 must try "control flow", "environment", or "state" |
-| Running same test 3x with same failure without code change | MEDIUM | True stuck loop — no progress possible. Hand off to fix with current incomplete diagnosis |
-| Scope creep via debug — "while investigating, also fix X" | HIGH | Step 1.5 Scope Lock: lock edits to narrowest affected directory. Fix recommendations MUST stay within boundary. Expand only with user confirmation |
-| Debug report recommends touching 5+ unrelated files | HIGH | Symptom of fixing at crash sites instead of source. Backward trace (Step 2) to find origin. If truly 5+ files → likely architectural issue → escalate via 3-Fix Rule |
-| Re-investigating known error patterns from scratch | MEDIUM | Step 2d: match error against Known Error Pattern Catalog first — skip hypothesis cycling for recognized patterns |
-| Same error fingerprint across cycles treated as different errors | MEDIUM | Step 2d: normalize line numbers, paths, variable names before comparison — same fingerprint = same error |
-
-## Done When
-
-- Error reproduced (not assumed) with specific reproduction steps documented
-- 2-3 hypotheses formed, each marked CONFIRMED or RULED OUT with file:line evidence
-- Root cause identified at specific file:line
-- Structured Debug Report emitted with 4-state status
-- If `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS`: caveats documented with impact assessment
-- If `NEEDS_CONTEXT`: specific questions + two likely answers provided
-- If `BLOCKED`: all 3 hypothesis cycles documented + escalation target identified
-- No code changes made — rune:fix called with the report if fix is needed
-
-## Cost Profile
-
-~2000-5000 tokens input, ~500-1500 tokens output. Sonnet for code analysis quality. May escalate to opus for deeply complex bugs.
-
-**Scope guardrail**: Do not apply code changes or expand investigation beyond the locked scope directory unless explicitly delegated by the parent agent.
+---
+name: debug
+description: Root cause analysis for bugs and unexpected behavior. Traces errors through code, uses structured reasoning, and hands off to fix when cause is found. Core of the debug↔fix mesh.
+metadata:
+  author: runedev
+  version: "1.1.0"
+  layer: L2
+  model: sonnet
+  group: development
+  tools: "Read, Bash, Glob, Grep"
+  emit: bug.diagnosed
+  listen: tests.failed
+---
+
+# debug
+
+## Purpose
+
+Root cause analysis ONLY. Debug investigates — it does NOT fix. It traces errors through code, analyzes stack traces, forms and tests hypotheses, and identifies the exact cause before handing off to rune:fix.
+
+<HARD-GATE>
+Do NOT fix the code. Debug investigates only. Any code change is out of scope.
+If root cause cannot be identified after 3 hypothesis cycles:
+- Escalate to `rune:problem-solver` for structured 5-Whys or Fishbone analysis
+- Or escalate to `rune:sequential-thinking` for multi-variable analysis
+- Report escalation in the Debug Report with all evidence gathered so far
+</HARD-GATE>
+
+## Triggers
+
+- Called by `cook` when implementation hits unexpected errors
+- Called by `test` when a test fails with unclear reason
+- Called by `fix` when root cause is unclear before fixing
+- `/rune debug <issue>` — manual debugging
+- Auto-trigger: when error output contains stack trace or error code
+
+## Calls (outbound)
+
+- `scout` (L2): find related code, trace imports, identify affected modules
+- `fix` (L2): when root cause found, hand off with diagnosis for fix application
+- `brainstorm` (L2): 3-Fix Escalation when root cause is "wrong approach" — invoke with mode="rescue" for category-diverse alternatives
+- `plan` (L2): 3-Fix Escalation when root cause is "wrong module design" — invoke for redesign
+- `docs-seeker` (L3): lookup API docs for unclear errors or deprecated APIs
+- `problem-solver` (L3): structured reasoning (5 Whys, Fishbone) for complex bugs
+- `browser-pilot` (L3): capture browser console errors, network failures, visual bugs
+- `sequential-thinking` (L3): multi-variable root cause analysis
+- `neural-memory` (L3): after root cause found — capture error pattern for future recognition
+
+## Called By (inbound)
+
+- `cook` (L1): implementation hits bug during Phase 4
+- `fix` (L2): root cause unclear, can't fix blindly — needs diagnosis first
+- `test` (L2): test fails unexpectedly, unclear why
+- `surgeon` (L2): diagnose issues in legacy modules
+
+## Cross-Hub Connections
+
+- `debug` ↔ `fix` — bidirectional: debug finds cause → fix applies, fix can't determine cause → debug investigates
+- `debug` ← `test` — test fails → debug investigates
+
+## Execution
+
+### Step 1: Reproduce
+
+Understand and confirm the error described in the request.
+
+- Read the error message, stack trace, and reproduction steps
+- Identify which environment it occurs in (dev/prod, browser/server)
+- Confirm the error is consistent and reproducible before proceeding
+- If no reproduction steps provided, ask for them or attempt the most likely path
+
+### Step 1.5: Scope Lock (Edit Boundary)
+
+After reproducing the error, **lock edits to the narrowest affected directory** to prevent debug-driven scope creep — the #1 source of "while I'm here, let me also fix..." violations.
+
+1. Identify the narrowest directory containing the affected files (from stack trace or error location)
+2. Announce to user: "Debug scope locked to `<dir>/`. Changes will be restricted to this area."
+3. Any fix recommendation in the Debug Report MUST reference only files within this boundary
+4. If root cause traces outside the boundary → expand scope with user confirmation first
+
+**Skip conditions** (do NOT lock):
+- Bug spans the entire repo (3+ unrelated directories in stack trace)
+- Cannot determine affected area from initial evidence
+- User explicitly says "investigate everything"
+
+**Why:** Debugging naturally expands scope as you trace root causes. Without a boundary, rune:fix receives recommendations touching 10+ files across unrelated modules. The scope lock forces discipline: fix at the source, not at every symptom site.
+
+
+### Step 2: Gather Evidence
+
+Use tools to collect facts — do NOT guess yet.
+
+- Use `Grep` to search codebase for the exact error string or related error codes
+- Use `Read` to examine stack trace files, log files, or the specific file:line mentioned
+- Use `Glob` to find related files (config, types, tests) that may be involved
+- Use `rune:browser-pilot` if the issue is UI-related (console errors, network failures, visual bugs)
+- Use `rune:scout` to trace imports and identify all modules touched by the affected code path
+
+#### Backward Tracing (for deep stack errors)
+
+When the error appears deep in execution (wrong directory, wrong path, wrong value):
+
+1. **Observe symptom** — what's the exact error and where does it appear?
+2. **Find immediate cause** — what code directly triggers this? Read that file:line
+3. **What called this?** — trace one level up. What value was passed? By whom?
+4. **Keep tracing up** — repeat until you find where the bad value ORIGINATES
+5. **Fix at source** — the root cause is where invalid data is CREATED, not where it CRASHES
+
+Rule: NEVER fix where the error appears. Trace back to where invalid data originated.
+
+#### Instrumentation Tip: Use console.error, Not Loggers
+When adding diagnostic instrumentation, use `console.error()` (stderr) — NOT application loggers. Loggers are configured to suppress output based on log level or environment (e.g., `LOG_LEVEL=warn` silences `logger.debug`). `console.error` bypasses all logger configuration and writes directly to stderr. This is counterintuitive but critical — the one time you NEED debug output is exactly when loggers are configured to hide it.
+
+#### Defense-in-Depth (After Root Cause Found)
+When the root cause is invalid data flowing through multiple layers, recommend fixing at ALL layers — not just the source:
+
+| Layer | Purpose | Example |
+|-------|---------|---------|
+| Layer 1: Entry Point | Reject invalid input at API/CLI boundary | Validate not empty, exists, correct type |
+| Layer 2: Business Logic | Ensure data makes sense for the operation | Validate required params before processing |
+| Layer 3: Environment Guards | Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts | Refuse destructive ops outside allowed dirs |
+| Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation | Capture context for forensics | Stack trace logging before dangerous operations |
+
+All four layers are necessary. During testing, each layer catches bugs the others miss — different code paths bypass single validation points. When recommending a fix via `rune:fix`, explicitly call out which layers need validation added.
+
+#### Multi-Component Instrumentation (for systems with 3+ layers)
+
+When the system has multiple components (CI → build → deploy, API → service → DB):
+
+Before hypothesizing, add diagnostic logging at EACH component boundary:
+- Log what data ENTERS each component
+- Log what data EXITS each component
+- Verify environment/config propagation across boundaries
+- Run once → analyze logs → identify WHICH boundary fails → THEN hypothesize
+
+This reveals: "secrets reach workflow ✓, workflow reaches build ✗" — pinpoints the failing layer.
+
+### Step 2b: Instrument with Preserved Markers
+
+When adding diagnostic logging or instrumentation during investigation, mark ALL additions with region markers:
+
+```
+// #region agent-debug — [hypothesis being tested]
+console.log('[DEBUG] value at boundary:', data);
+// #endregion agent-debug
+```
+
+Language-appropriate equivalents:
+- Python: `# region agent-debug` / `# endregion agent-debug`
+- Rust: `// region agent-debug` / `// endregion agent-debug`
+
+**Why preserved markers matter:**
+- `rune:fix` will preserve these markers until the bug is fully resolved and tests pass
+- If the bug recurs, markers show exactly what was previously instrumented
+- Cleaning up debug traces before the fix is verified prevents learning from failure history
+- After fix is verified + tests pass → fix will clean up markers in a final pass
+
+<HARD-GATE>
+ALL diagnostic code added during debug MUST be wrapped in `#region agent-debug` markers.
+Unmarked instrumentation will be treated as stray code and removed prematurely.
+</HARD-GATE>
+
+### Step 2c: Check Debug Knowledge Base
+
+Before forming hypotheses, check `.rune/debug/knowledge-base.md`:
+- If file exists → search for matching symptoms/error messages
+- If match found → try known fix FIRST, skip hypothesis cycle
+- If no match → proceed to Step 3
+
+After successful root cause identification (Step 5), append entry:
+```
+### [date] — [symptom summary]
+- **Symptom**: [error message or behavior]
+- **Root Cause**: [what was actually wrong]
+- **Fix**: [what resolved it]
+- **Files**: [affected files]
+```
+
+This prevents re-debugging the same issue across sessions.
+
+### Step 2d: Known Error Pattern Matching
+
+Before forming hypotheses, match the error against common **error archetypes**. If a match is found, skip directly to the known fix approach — no hypothesis cycling needed.
+
+**Error Pattern Catalog**:
+
+| Pattern ID | Detection (Error Type + Keywords) | Root Cause | Recovery Hint |
+|------------|----------------------------------|------------|---------------|
+| `STATELESS_LOSS` | `NameError` / `ReferenceError` + variable defined in previous step | Execution context doesn't persist between tool calls | "Combine all variable definitions and usage in a single code block" |
+| `MODULE_NOT_FOUND` | `ModuleNotFoundError` / `Cannot find module` | Dependency not installed or wrong import path | "Check package.json/requirements.txt. Install missing dep, then retry" |
+| `TYPE_MISMATCH` | `TypeError` + "undefined is not a function" / "has no attribute" | Wrong type passed through chain — object where primitive expected or vice versa | "Trace the value backward: where was it created? What type was intended?" |
+| `ASYNC_DEADLOCK` | `TimeoutError` / `Promise` + hang / `await` missing | Async/await misuse — missing await, blocking in async, unresolved promise | "Check: missing await? Blocking call in async context? Unresolved promise chain?" |
+| `PATH_MISMATCH` | `ENOENT` / `FileNotFoundError` + path string in error | Relative vs absolute path, or CWD differs from expected | "Print resolved path. Check CWD. Use path.resolve() or Path.resolve()" |
+| `ENCODING_ISSUE` | `UnicodeDecodeError` / `SyntaxError` + quotes/special chars | Non-ASCII characters in code or data (curly quotes, BOM, etc.) | "Check for smart quotes, BOM markers, or non-ASCII in the file. Use `file` command to check encoding" |
+| `ENV_MISSING` | `KeyError` / "undefined" + env var name | Environment variable not set or .env not loaded | "Check .env file exists and is loaded. Verify var name matches exactly (case-sensitive)" |
+| `CIRCULAR_IMPORT` | `ImportError` + "partially initialized" / "circular" | Module A imports B imports A | "Restructure: move shared types to a third module, or use lazy imports" |
+
+**Matching rules**:
+- Match on error type + 2+ keywords from the Detection column
+- If matched: report the pattern ID and recovery hint in the Debug Report, then proceed to test the known fix approach as H1 (highest priority hypothesis)
+- If NOT matched: proceed to Step 3 (form hypotheses from scratch)
+
+**Error fingerprinting**: When comparing errors across hypothesis cycles, normalize these elements before comparison:
+- Line numbers → `<LINE>`
+- File paths → `<PATH>`
+- Variable/function names → `<IDENT>`
+- Timestamps → `<TIME>`
+
+Two errors with the same fingerprint after normalization are the SAME error — don't re-investigate, the previous hypothesis result still applies.
+
+**Catalog growth**: After each successful debug (Step 5), check: does this error pattern match any existing catalog entry? If not, and the root cause is generalizable (not project-specific), suggest adding it to the catalog via a note in the Debug Report: "New pattern candidate: [pattern] — consider adding to error catalog."
+
+### Step 3: Form Hypotheses
+
+List exactly 2-3 possible root causes — no more, no fewer.
+
+- Each hypothesis must be specific (name the file, function, or line if possible)
+- Order by likelihood (most likely first)
+- Format:
+  - H1: [specific hypothesis — file/function/pattern]
+  - H2: [specific hypothesis]
+  - H3: [specific hypothesis]
+
+### Step 4: Test Hypotheses
+
+Test each hypothesis systematically using tools.
+
+- Use `Read` to inspect the suspected file/function for each hypothesis
+- Use `Bash` to run targeted tests: a single failing test, a type check, a linter on the file
+- Use `rune:browser-pilot` for UI hypotheses (inspect DOM, network, console)
+- For each hypothesis: mark CONFIRMED / RULED OUT with evidence
+- If all 3 hypotheses are ruled out → go back to Step 2 to gather more evidence
+- Maximum 3 hypothesis cycles. If still unresolved after 3 cycles → escalate (see Hard-Gate)
+
+### Step 5: Identify Root Cause
+
+Narrow to the single actual cause.
+
+- State the confirmed hypothesis and the exact evidence that proves it
+- Identify the specific file, line number, and code construct responsible
+- Note any contributing factors (environment, data, timing, config)
+
+### Step 5b: Capture Error Pattern
+
+Call `neural-memory` (Capture Mode) to save the error pattern: root cause, symptoms, and fix approach. Tag with [project-name, error, technology].
+
+### Step 6: 3-Fix Escalation Rule
+
+<HARD-GATE>
+If the SAME bug has been "fixed" 3 times and keeps returning:
+1. STOP fixing. The bug is not the problem — the ARCHITECTURE is.
+2. **Classify the failure**:
+   - **Same category of blocker each time** (e.g., API doesn't support X, platform limitation) → the APPROACH is wrong, not just the code
+   - **Different bugs each time** (e.g., race condition, then null pointer, then type error) → the MODULE needs redesign
+3. **Route based on classification**:
+   - Approach is wrong → Escalate to `rune:brainstorm(mode="rescue")` for category-diverse alternatives
+   - Module needs redesign → Escalate to `rune:plan` for redesign of the affected module
+4. Report all 3 fix attempts and why each failed in the escalation.
+"Try a 4th fix" is NOT acceptable. After 3 failures, question the design OR the approach.
+</HARD-GATE>
+
+Track fix attempts in the Debug Report. If this is attempt N>1 for the same symptom:
+- Reference previous fix attempts and their outcomes
+- Explain why the previous fix didn't hold
+- If N=3: trigger the escalation gate above — classify and route accordingly
+
+### 3+ Fixes as Architectural Signal
+
+> From superpowers (obra/superpowers, 84k★): "Each fix revealing new problems elsewhere = structural issue, not a bug hunt."
+
+When 3+ **distinct** fixes fail (not retries of the same fix), STOP treating it as a bug:
+
+| Signal | Interpretation | Next Step |
+|--------|---------------|-----------|
+| Same blocker each time (API limit, platform gap) | Wrong approach | `brainstorm(mode="rescue")` — need fundamentally different path |
+| Different bugs each fix (null → race → type) | Wrong architecture | `plan` redesign — module has structural problems |
+| Each fix creates a new bug elsewhere | Tight coupling | The module boundary is wrong — need to redraw boundaries before fixing |
+| Fix works locally but fails in integration | Missing contract | Cross-module interface is undefined — add explicit contracts first |
+
+**Key insight**: After 3 failures, question the DESIGN, not the CODE. "Try harder" is never the right answer at this point.
+
+### Step 7: Report
+
+Produce structured output and hand off to rune:fix.
+
+- Write the Debug Report (see Output Format below)
+- Call `rune:fix` with the full report if fix is needed
+- Do NOT apply any code changes — report only
+
+## Analysis Paralysis Guard
+
+<HARD-GATE>
+Debug is read-heavy by nature — but there are limits.
+
+After Step 4 (Test Hypotheses): if NO hypothesis is confirmed after 3 cycles of Steps 2-4, you MUST stop and escalate. Do NOT start cycle 4. Report all evidence gathered and escalate to problem-solver or sequential-thinking.
+
+Within any single step: 5+ consecutive Read/Grep calls without forming or testing a hypothesis = stuck. Stop reading, form a hypothesis from what you have, and test it. Incomplete hypotheses that get tested are better than perfect hypotheses that never form.
+</HARD-GATE>
+
+### Hash-Based Evidence Loop Detection
+
+Beyond counting reads, detect when debug is **re-gathering the same evidence without progress** — the most common debug-specific stuck pattern.
+
+**Detection signals** (track mentally across hypothesis cycles):
+
+| Signal | Count | Meaning | Action |
+|--------|-------|---------|--------|
+| Reading the same file:line range in different cycles | 2x | Re-examining without new lens | Form hypothesis from existing evidence NOW |
+| Running the same test command with same failure output | 3x | No code changed between runs | STOP — hand off to fix with current diagnosis, even if incomplete |
+| Grepping the same error string after already finding all occurrences | 2x | Hoping for different results | Evidence is complete — move to Step 3 (hypothesize) |
+| Same hypothesis tested with same evidence across cycles | 2x | Circular reasoning | Mark hypothesis INCONCLUSIVE, try a DIFFERENT hypothesis category |
+
+**Hypothesis category diversity rule**: If H1 (cycle 1) was "wrong input data" and it was RULED OUT, H1 (cycle 2) MUST be from a DIFFERENT category:
+
+| Category | Examples |
+|----------|---------|
+| Data | Wrong value, missing field, type mismatch, encoding |
+| Control Flow | Wrong branch, missing guard, race condition, async ordering |
+| Environment | Wrong config, missing env var, version mismatch, path issue |
+| State | Stale cache, mutation side-effect, leaked reference, dangling connection |
+
+
+## Red Flags — STOP and Return to Step 2
+
+If you catch yourself thinking any of these, you are GUESSING, not debugging:
+
+- "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
+- "Just try changing X and see if it works"
+- "It's probably X, let me fix that"
+- "I don't fully understand but this might work"
+- "Here are the main problems: [lists fixes without investigation]"
+- Proposing solutions before tracing data flow
+- "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)
+- "Let me read one more file before forming a hypothesis" (after 5+ reads)
+
+ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Step 2 (Gather Evidence).
+
+## Constraints
+
+1. MUST NOT apply any code changes — debug investigates only, fix applies
+2. MUST reproduce the error before forming hypotheses — no guessing from error messages alone
+3. MUST gather evidence (file reads, grep, stack traces) before hypothesizing
+4. MUST form exactly 2-3 hypotheses, ordered by likelihood — no more, no fewer
+5. MUST mark each hypothesis CONFIRMED or RULED OUT with specific evidence
+6. MUST NOT exceed 3 hypothesis cycles — escalate to problem-solver or sequential-thinking
+7. MUST NOT say "I know what's wrong" without citing file:line evidence
+8. For deep stack errors: MUST use backward tracing (Step 2) — never fix at the crash site
+9. For multi-component systems: MUST instrument boundaries before hypothesizing
+
+## Output Format
+
+```
+## Debug Report
+- **Error**: [error message]
+- **Status**: DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | NEEDS_CONTEXT | BLOCKED
+- **Severity**: critical | high | medium | low
+- **Confidence**: high | medium | low
+- **Fix Attempt**: [1/2/3 — track recurring bugs]
+
+### Root Cause
+[Detailed explanation of what's causing the error]
+
+### Location
+- `path/to/file.ts:42` — [description of the problematic code]
+
+### Evidence
+1. [observation supporting diagnosis]
+2. [observation supporting diagnosis]
+
+### Previous Fix Attempts (if any)
+- Attempt 1: [what was tried] → [why it didn't hold]
+- Attempt 2: [what was tried] → [why it didn't hold]
+
+### Concerns (if DONE_WITH_CONCERNS)
+- [concern]: [impact assessment] — [suggested remediation]
+
+### Context Needed (if NEEDS_CONTEXT)
+- [what is unknown]: [why it blocks diagnosis] — [two most likely answers]
+
+### Suggested Fix
+[Description of what needs to change — no code, just direction]
+[If attempt 3: "ESCALATION: 3-fix rule triggered. Recommending redesign via rune:plan."]
+
+### Related Code
+- `path/to/related.ts` — [why it's relevant]
+```
+
+### Status Protocol (Subagent Contract)
+
+Debug returns one of four statuses to its caller (cook, fix, test, surgeon). The caller uses this to route next actions.
+
+| Status | When | Example |
+|--------|------|---------|
+| `DONE` | Root cause identified with high confidence, ready for fix | Clear diagnosis with file:line evidence |
+| `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS` | Root cause found but diagnosis has caveats | "Likely race condition but cannot reproduce consistently — fix may need retry logic" |
+| `NEEDS_CONTEXT` | Cannot diagnose without more info — missing repro steps, env details, or access | "Error only occurs in production — need prod logs or env variables to continue" |
+| `BLOCKED` | Exhausted 3 hypothesis cycles, escalation triggered | "3 cycles completed, no confirmed root cause — escalating to problem-solver" |
+
+## Returns
+
+| Artifact | Format | Location |
+|----------|--------|----------|
+| Debug Report | Markdown (inline) | Emitted to calling skill (cook, fix, test, surgeon) |
+| Root cause + location | Inline (Debug Report) | Specific file:line with evidence |
+| Fix recommendation | Inline (Debug Report) | Direction only — no code changes |
+| Debug knowledge base entry | Markdown | `.rune/debug/knowledge-base.md` (appended on success) |
+
+## Chain Metadata
+
+Append to Debug Report when invoked standalone. Suppress when called as sub-skill inside an L1 orchestrator (cook, team, etc.) — the orchestrator emits a consolidated block. See `docs/references/chain-metadata.md`.
+
+```yaml
+chain_metadata:
+  skill: "rune:debug"
+  version: "1.1.0"
+  status: "[DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | NEEDS_CONTEXT | BLOCKED]"
+  domain: "[area debugged]"
+  files_changed: []  # debug never changes files
+  exports:
+    root_cause: { file: "[path]", line: [N], explanation: "[cause]" }
+    severity: "[critical | high | medium | low]"
+    confidence: "[high | medium | low]"
+    fix_recommendation: "[direction for fix skill]"
+  suggested_next:
+    - skill: "rune:fix"
+      reason: "[grounded in root cause — e.g., 'Critical race condition found in auth.ts:42']"
+      consumes: ["root_cause", "fix_recommendation"]
+```
+
+## Sharp Edges
+
+| Failure Mode | Severity | Mitigation |
+|---|---|---|
+| Forming hypothesis from error message alone without evidence | HIGH | Evidence-first rule: read files and grep logs BEFORE hypothesizing |
+| Modifying code while "investigating" | CRITICAL | HARD-GATE: any code change during debug = out of scope — hand off to fix |
+| Marking hypothesis CONFIRMED without file:line proof | HIGH | CONFIRMED requires specific evidence cited — "it makes sense" is not evidence |
+| Exceeding 3 hypothesis cycles without escalation | MEDIUM | After 3 cycles: escalate to rune:problem-solver or rune:sequential-thinking |
+| Same bug "fixed" 3+ times without questioning architecture | CRITICAL | 3-Fix Escalation Rule: classify failure → same blocker category = brainstorm(rescue), different bugs = plan redesign |
+| Escalating to plan when the APPROACH is wrong (not the module) | HIGH | If all 3 fixes hit the same category of blocker (API limit, platform gap), the approach needs pivoting via brainstorm(rescue), not re-planning |
+| Not tracking fix attempt number for recurring bugs | HIGH | Debug Report MUST include Fix Attempt counter — enables escalation gate |
+| Adding instrumentation without region markers | MEDIUM | All debug logging MUST use `#region agent-debug` — unmarked code gets cleaned up prematurely by fix |
+| Re-reading same file:line in different hypothesis cycles | HIGH | Hash-based evidence loop: if same evidence gathered 2x, form hypothesis from existing data — don't re-gather |
+| Same hypothesis category across cycles after RULED OUT | HIGH | Hypothesis category diversity: if "data" ruled out in cycle 1, cycle 2 must try "control flow", "environment", or "state" |
+| Running same test 3x with same failure without code change | MEDIUM | True stuck loop — no progress possible. Hand off to fix with current incomplete diagnosis |
+| Scope creep via debug — "while investigating, also fix X" | HIGH | Step 1.5 Scope Lock: lock edits to narrowest affected directory. Fix recommendations MUST stay within boundary. Expand only with user confirmation |
+| Debug report recommends touching 5+ unrelated files | HIGH | Symptom of fixing at crash sites instead of source. Backward trace (Step 2) to find origin. If truly 5+ files → likely architectural issue → escalate via 3-Fix Rule |
+| Re-investigating known error patterns from scratch | MEDIUM | Step 2d: match error against Known Error Pattern Catalog first — skip hypothesis cycling for recognized patterns |
+| Same error fingerprint across cycles treated as different errors | MEDIUM | Step 2d: normalize line numbers, paths, variable names before comparison — same fingerprint = same error |
+
+## Done When
+
+- Error reproduced (not assumed) with specific reproduction steps documented
+- 2-3 hypotheses formed, each marked CONFIRMED or RULED OUT with file:line evidence
+- Root cause identified at specific file:line
+- Structured Debug Report emitted with 4-state status
+- If `DONE_WITH_CONCERNS`: caveats documented with impact assessment
+- If `NEEDS_CONTEXT`: specific questions + two likely answers provided
+- If `BLOCKED`: all 3 hypothesis cycles documented + escalation target identified
+- No code changes made — rune:fix called with the report if fix is needed
+
+## Cost Profile
+
+~2000-5000 tokens input, ~500-1500 tokens output. Sonnet for code analysis quality. May escalate to opus for deeply complex bugs.
+
+**Scope guardrail**: Do not apply code changes or expand investigation beyond the locked scope directory unless explicitly delegated by the parent agent.