@pmelab/gtd 24.4.0 → 26.0.0

package/dist/workflows.mjs

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-import { dirname } from "node:path";
 //#region \0rolldown/runtime.js
 var __defProp = Object.defineProperty;
 var __exportAll = (all, no_symbols) => {
@@ -330,13 +329,6 @@ const escalation$1 = async (count, steps) => {
 	await steps.describe();
 	await steps.stop();
 };
-/** Run `check` again while `pending()` holds — a run then does not count — and resolve the first run that does. */
-const untilSettled = async (check, pending) => {
-	for (;;) {
-		const green = await check();
-		if (!pending()) return green;
-	}
-};
 const STAMP = /\n<!-- gtd check [0-9a-f]+ -->\n?$/;
 const stripStamp = (text) => text.replace(STAMP, "\n");
 /**
@@ -389,102 +381,59 @@ const fixFindings = async (f) => {
 };
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflow-kit/scenarios.ts
-const DOC_STRING = /^(\s*)("""|```)/;
-/**
-* Gherkin wording only: lines trimmed; blank, `#` comment and `@` tag lines
-* dropped — except inside a doc string, whose content is test input: kept
-* whole, indented relative to its opening delimiter (as Gherkin reads it).
-*/
-const scenarioText = (source) => {
+const DOC_STRING = /^("""|```)/;
+const THEN = /^Then\s/;
+const CONTINUATION = /^(And|But|\*)\s/;
+const HEADING = /^(Feature|Rule|Background|Scenario|Scenario Outline|Scenario Template|Example):/;
+/** Trimmed lines outside doc strings, whose content is test input, not steps. */
+const stepLines = (source) => {
 	const out = [];
-	let doc;
-	for (const line of source.split("\n")) {
-		const delimiter = DOC_STRING.exec(line);
-		if (doc === void 0 && delimiter !== null) {
-			doc = {
-				indent: delimiter[1].length,
-				fence: delimiter[2]
-			};
-			out.push(line.trim());
-		} else if (doc !== void 0 && line.trim().startsWith(doc.fence)) {
-			doc = void 0;
-			out.push(line.trim());
-		} else if (doc !== void 0) {
-			const lead = line.length - line.trimStart().length;
-			out.push(line.slice(Math.min(lead, doc.indent)).trimEnd());
-		} else {
-			const trimmed = line.trim();
-			if (trimmed !== "" && !trimmed.startsWith("#") && !trimmed.startsWith("@")) out.push(trimmed);
-		}
+	let fence;
+	for (const trimmed of source.split("\n").map((l) => l.trim())) {
+		const opening = fence === void 0 ? DOC_STRING.exec(trimmed)?.[1] : void 0;
+		if (opening !== void 0) fence = opening;
+		else if (fence === void 0) out.push(trimmed);
+		else if (trimmed.startsWith(fence)) fence = void 0;
 	}
-	return out.join("\n");
-};
-const textOf = (path) => {
-	const source = read(path);
-	return source === void 0 ? void 0 : scenarioText(source);
-};
-/** Snapshot `.feature` paths at `head()`, merged over `previous`; `undefined` when nothing is frozen. */
-const freezeScenarios = (paths, previous) => {
-	if (paths.length === 0) return previous;
-	const texts = { ...previous?.texts };
-	for (const path of paths) {
-		const text = textOf(path);
-		if (text !== void 0) texts[path] = text;
-	}
-	return Object.keys(texts).length === 0 ? previous : {
-		at: head$1(),
-		texts
-	};
+	return out;
 };
-/** Paths whose wording differs from the snapshot (a deleted file counts). */
-const driftedScenarios = (frozen) => Object.entries(frozen.texts).filter(([path, text]) => textOf(path) !== text).map(([path]) => path);
-const lines = (text) => text === void 0 || text === "" ? [] : text.split("\n");
-/** `table[i][j]`: the longest common subsequence of `a[i..]` and `b[j..]`. */
-const lcsTable = (a, b) => {
-	const table = Array.from({ length: a.length + 1 }, () => Array(b.length + 1).fill(0));
-	for (let i = a.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) for (let j = b.length - 1; j >= 0; j--) table[i][j] = a[i] === b[j] ? table[i + 1][j + 1] + 1 : Math.max(table[i + 1][j], table[i][j + 1]);
-	return table;
-};
-/** Changed lines in file order, `- ` / `+ `-prefixed, so a moved or repeated step still shows. */
-const lineDiff = (a, b) => {
-	const table = lcsTable(a, b);
+const neutral = (line) => line === "" || line.startsWith("#") || line.startsWith("|");
+/** Trimmed `Then` step lines, an `And`/`But`/`*` continuing one included; doc strings skipped. */
+const assertionLines = (source) => {
 	const out = [];
-	let i = 0;
-	let j = 0;
-	while (i < a.length && j < b.length) if (a[i] === b[j]) {
-		i++;
-		j++;
-	} else if (table[i + 1][j] >= table[i][j + 1]) out.push(`- ${a[i++]}`);
-	else out.push(`+ ${b[j++]}`);
-	return [
-		...out,
-		...a.slice(i).map((l) => `- ${l}`),
-		...b.slice(j).map((l) => `+ ${l}`)
-	];
+	let inThen = false;
+	let scenario = "";
+	for (const line of stepLines(source)) {
+		if (HEADING.test(line)) scenario = line;
+		if (THEN.test(line)) inThen = true;
+		else if (!CONTINUATION.test(line) && !neutral(line)) inThen = false;
+		if (inThen && !neutral(line)) out.push({
+			scenario,
+			line
+		});
+	}
+	return out;
 };
-const wordingDrift = (frozen, path) => ({
-	path,
-	lines: lineDiff(lines(frozen.texts[path]), lines(textOf(path)))
-});
+const key = (a) => `${a.scenario}\n${a.line}`;
 /**
-* After a turn: rest at `stop` while wording drifted from `frozen`. Whatever
-* still differs after it is accepted and moves the snapshot; what was
-* restored stays frozen as it was.
+* Assertions a `.feature` file that existed before `changes` lost — the one
+* way rewording a scenario can weaken it. Matched within each scenario and
+* counted, so a line moving to another scenario, or one of two identical
+* `Then`s dropped, still shows. A renamed scenario reports all of its own.
 */
-const holdWording$1 = async (frozen, stop) => {
-	if (frozen === void 0) return;
-	const drifted = driftedScenarios(frozen);
-	if (drifted.length === 0) return;
-	await stop(frozen.at, drifted.map((path) => wordingDrift(frozen, path)));
-	const accepted = driftedScenarios(frozen);
-	if (accepted.length === 0) return;
-	for (const path of accepted) {
-		const text = textOf(path);
-		if (text === void 0) delete frozen.texts[path];
-		else frozen.texts[path] = text;
-	}
-	frozen.at = head$1();
-};
+const removedAssertions = (changes) => changes.filter((c) => c.path.endsWith(".feature") && c.before !== void 0).map((c) => {
+	const left = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
+	for (const a of assertionLines(c.after ?? "")) left.set(key(a), (left.get(key(a)) ?? 0) + 1);
+	const lines = assertionLines(c.before ?? "").filter((a) => {
+		const n = left.get(key(a)) ?? 0;
+		left.set(key(a), n - 1);
+		return n <= 0;
+	});
+	return {
+		path: c.path,
+		lines
+	};
+}).filter((r) => r.lines.length > 0);
 //#endregion
 //#region node_modules/mdast-util-to-string/lib/index.js
 /**
@@ -17146,7 +17095,8 @@ ${footnoteFoldIn}${codeThreadReplies()}
 - Every open point here is TECHNICAL — triage already resolved
   the product ones, one phase earlier. PERMISSIVE: answer it
   yourself unless you genuinely cannot defend a default; a wrong
-  technical call is still caught by the full run and the quality lap
+  technical call is still caught by each package's suite run and the
+  quality lap
 - The narrow exception: a simplification that drops something
   \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\` mentions is an open question, not a
   silent default
@@ -17158,11 +17108,13 @@ ${footnoteFoldIn}${codeThreadReplies()}
      only, as fenced TypeScript (or the repository's language)
   3. \`## Call Stacks\` — seam level, entry point → module
      boundary; one line per hop, never per line of code
-  4. \`## E2E Scenarios\` — Gherkin in fenced \`gherkin\` blocks
-     (whatever e2e framework the repository uses), each preceded
-     by a line \`- e2e: <path>\`. With no user-visible
-     behaviour change, the literal line \`No e2e change.\` plus a
-     one-line reason — never empty or missing
+  4. \`## E2E Scenarios\` — one line per user-visible behaviour,
+     \`- e2e: <path> — <behaviour> (covers <concern>)\`, in plain
+     words: the builder writes the scenario in the repository's
+     own e2e framework, so never spell out Gherkin here. With no
+     user-visible behaviour change, the literal line
+     \`No e2e change.\` plus a one-line reason — never empty or
+     missing
   5. \`## Unit Tests\` — one \`### <interface>\` per entry of
      \`## Interfaces\`, each test a line
      \`- unit: <path> — <behaviour> (covers <concern>)\`;
@@ -17188,35 +17140,31 @@ const architectureDecomposePrompt = () => `${styleBlock}
 ${stateFileRules}
 - The only state files this turn touches are the package files
   under \`.gtd/packages/\` — no other files for notes or output.
-  Never delete \`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\`: the build tail's full run
-  still needs it, and package files may reference it
+  Never delete \`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\`: package files may
+  reference it, and it is removed with the last package
 - Work from \`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\` if you wrote it earlier this
   conversation, otherwise read it (the converged technical
   plan). It already lists the concerns, interfaces, e2e scenarios
   and unit tests — this turn groups them into packages. A
   \`## Merged Concerns\` heading there records merges, never a
   concern of its own: write no package file for it
-- A package is a consecutive run of \`## Unit Tests\` entries that go
-  green together on the fast suite, at most ~8 unit-test entries
-  each. Keep the merge rule: concerns whose footprints centre on the
-  same files stay in one package unless the later one only consumes
-  an interface the earlier one creates. Prefer fewer, larger
-  packages. Order them so each stays green on the fast suite —
-  interface-introducing packages first
+- A package is one concern's slice, and each must leave the full
+  suite green — every package boundary costs a full run, so write
+  as few as the concerns allow. Keep the merge rule: concerns whose
+  footprints centre on the same files stay in one package unless
+  the later one only consumes an interface the earlier one creates.
+  Order them interface-introducing packages first
 - Write the packages under \`.gtd/packages/\`, each carrying its
   requirement(s) — both, independently, if merged — its tasks, and
   each task's acceptance criteria as \`- [ ]\` checkboxes and
   relevant paths:
-  - \`.gtd/packages/00-e2e-scenarios.md\` — package 0: it writes
-    \`## E2E Scenarios\` as tests in the repository's own e2e
-    framework and leaves them red. Write no such file when
-    \`## E2E Scenarios\` says "No e2e change."
-  - \`01-…\` onward — the unit-test packages. A requirement no test
-    covers (docs, README, deletions, config) becomes a chore
-    package, or a task of one; chore packages declare no tests
-  - the last numbered package is the wiring package: CLI entry,
-    workflow composition, config. A red e2e after it is a bug, not
-    missing work
+  - \`01-…\` onward — one vertical slice each: the unit tests,
+    the code, the wiring (CLI entry, workflow composition, config)
+    and every \`## E2E Scenarios\` entry its concern covers, so the
+    slice ends with its scenarios passing. A requirement no test
+    covers (docs, README, deletions, config) is a task of the slice
+    it belongs to; only one no slice owns becomes a chore package,
+    which declares no tests
 - Every package with tests has a \`## Tests\` section, one line per
   declared test, copied from the architecture entries:
   \`- unit: \\\`<path>\\\`\` or \`- e2e: \\\`<path>\\\`\`. Chore packages have
@@ -17262,10 +17210,10 @@ const packagesItemBuildingPrompt = (pkg) => `${stateFileRules}
 - Write the tests the package declares under \`## Tests\` first,
   then the code that makes them pass; the turn is refused unless
   every declared test is in your diff
-- Package 0 (\`.gtd/packages/00-e2e-scenarios.md\`) writes the scenarios verbatim
-  from \`## E2E Scenarios\` of \`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\`, with only
-  step code that typechecks, and leaves them red — no
-  implementation
+- A declared e2e test is a scenario in the repository's own e2e
+  framework for the behaviour its \`## E2E Scenarios\` entry names.
+  Word it to fit the existing steps — reuse and generalise them
+  rather than adding one-off ones
 - Implement every task the package describes, no more, no less,
   fanning independent ones out to parallel subagents where your
   harness supports it; leave other package files untouched
@@ -17319,22 +17267,9 @@ Edit \`.gtd/ESCALATION.md\` with fresh instructions for the next fix
 turn, or land untouched to give it one more attempt at the same
 analysis.
 `;
-const buildContextPrompt = (built) => {
-	const list = (paths) => paths.length === 0 ? "  (none)" : paths.map((path) => `  - ${path}`).join("\n");
-	return `- Read \`.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md\` — the plan every package was built from
-- A red scenario that is NEW in this plan likely means missing wiring
-  between packages; new scenarios:
-${list(built.scenarios.added)}
-- A red CHANGED or existing scenario or test is a regression a package
-  introduced; scenarios this plan changed:
-${list(built.scenarios.changed)}
-- Each package's commits, to bisect a break:
-${built.ranges.map((r) => `  git log --oneline ${r.from}..${r.to}  # ${r.pkg}`).join("\n")}
-`;
-};
-const buildFixPrompt = (built) => `${stateFileRules}
+const buildFixPrompt = () => `${stateFileRules}
 ${fixFeedbackPrompt}
-${built === void 0 ? "" : buildContextPrompt(built)}- Leave everything uncommitted — do not commit
+- Leave everything uncommitted — do not commit
 `;
 const finisherSystem = () => `${finisherPersona}
 
@@ -17655,7 +17590,18 @@ actionability, and never dismiss a real note or edit as approval.
 - If not: finish without writing anything — changing nothing is
   the sign-off
 `;
-const buildReviewReviewingPrompt = (base, carry) => `${styleBlock}
+const scenariosPrompt = (removed) => `- When a scenario in a \`.feature\` file was added or changed since the
+  base, the first chunk is \`## Scenarios\`: one pointer per such
+  scenario, its note saying in plain words what behaviour it now pins
+  down — the human signs off the scenarios here, nowhere else
+${removed.length === 0 ? "" : `- These assertions of scenarios that existed at the base are gone:
+${removed.map(({ path, lines }) => lines.map((a) => `    ${path} — ${a.scenario} — ${a.line}\n`).join("")).join("")}  Open the note of each scenario that lost one with \`Weakened:\`,
+  naming the lost line and whether \`.gtd/REQUIREMENTS.md\` asked
+  for it. A scenario that no longer exists has no pointer of its own:
+  put its \`Weakened:\` note on a pointer of the chunk covering its
+  removal
+`}`;
+const buildReviewReviewingPrompt = (base, carry, removed = []) => `${styleBlock}
 
 ${styleFormatContract}
 
@@ -17697,7 +17643,7 @@ review the changes:
   A note sitting entirely on the line(s) beneath the pointer is
   also valid. Either way, the note must never start with a bare \`./path\` token
   — that parses as a second pointer, not a note
-No diff is given — read the changes yourself. The range runs
+${scenariosPrompt(removed)}No diff is given — read the changes yourself. The range runs
 from \`${base}\` to the working tree (committed turns
 plus anything pending); on a feedback round that's the previous
 review's boundary, so it covers only what's new.
@@ -17744,20 +17690,6 @@ ${it.processCostByModel.map((m) => `- ${m.model}: ${m.cost}\n`).join("")}
 Print the closing message and stop — this writes nothing itself.
 `;
 };
-const scenarioWordingMessage = (at, drifted) => `The e2e scenario wording was frozen when package 0 landed, and the last
-turn changed it. Removed lines are marked \`-\`, added ones \`+\`:
-
-${drifted.map(({ path, lines }) => `${path}\n${lines.join("\n")}`).join("\n\n")}
-
-To accept the change, land untouched.
-
-To reject it, run
-
-    git checkout ${at} -- ${drifted.map(({ path }) => quote(path)).join(" ")}
-
-and land. Restoring only some of the files is a partial accept: every file
-still differing from the frozen wording is accepted.
-`;
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/shared/steps.ts
 const FEEDBACK = ".gtd/FEEDBACK.md";
@@ -17768,7 +17700,7 @@ const REVIEW = ".gtd/REVIEW.md";
 const QUALITY = ".gtd/QUALITY.md";
 const planner = () => env.plannerModel ?? "";
 const coder = () => env.coderModel ?? "";
-const fixCheck = (built) => agentWithSkills("fix", buildFixPrompt(built), {
+const fixCheck = () => agentWithSkills("fix", buildFixPrompt(), {
 	label: "Fixing the check",
 	file: FEEDBACK,
 	model: coder(),
@@ -17824,7 +17756,7 @@ const fixQuality = () => agentWithSkills("fix.quality.fixing", buildFixQualityPr
 	allowEmpty: true
 });
 /** Write `.gtd/REVIEW.md` over everything since `base`, carrying the answers of commit `carry` when given. */
-const reviewing = (base, carry) => agentWithSkills("review.reviewing", buildReviewReviewingPrompt(base, carry), {
+const reviewing = (base, carry) => agentWithSkills("review.reviewing", buildReviewReviewingPrompt(base, carry, removedAssertions(changesSince(base))), {
 	label: "Reviewing",
 	file: REVIEW,
 	mode: "review",
@@ -17855,25 +17787,13 @@ const reviewMissing = (round) => human("review.review-missing", {
 });
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/shared/health.ts
-/** Written while `fastTestCommand` is unset; its presence rests the process at the check. */
-const SETUP = ".gtd/SETUP.md";
-const SETUP_TEXT = "The bundled workflow needs the `fastTestCommand` setting: the fast suite (everything but e2e).\nSet it as a workflow option in `gtd.config.ts` or as GTD_FASTTESTCOMMAND.";
-/** Shell lines for a check's preamble: unset (blank after trim) setting writes `SETUP` and skips the suite. */
-const fastSuiteGuard = () => (env.fastTestCommand ?? "").trim() === "" ? [
-	`mkdir -p ${quote(dirname(SETUP))}`,
-	`printf '%s\\n' ${quote(SETUP_TEXT)} > ${quote(SETUP)}`,
-	`printf '%s\\n' ${quote(SETUP_TEXT)} >&2`,
-	"exit 0"
-] : [`rm -f ${quote(SETUP)}`];
 /** Fix turns a run of red checks gets before it escalates. */
 const FIX_CAP = 3;
-const unconfigured = () => read(SETUP) !== void 0;
 /** Run the suite as step `name`; resolves `true` when it passed. A failure is in `.gtd/FEEDBACK.md`. */
-const baseline = (name, label = "Checking the baseline") => untilSettled(() => check(name, env.testCommand ?? "", {
+const baseline = (name, label = "Checking the baseline") => check(name, env.testCommand ?? "", {
 	report: FEEDBACK,
-	label,
-	preamble: fastSuiteGuard()
-}), unconfigured);
+	label
+});
 const escalationSteps = {
 	limit: 2,
 	describe: describeEscalation,
@@ -17911,22 +17831,18 @@ const sameFailure = async (previous, current) => {
 	});
 	return comparable && truncated.length === 0 && answered(answers.verdict, "identical", numeric(vars.judgeIdenticalMinP, Infinity));
 };
-const runSuite = (options) => {
-	const fast = options.suite === "fast";
-	return check("health.check", (fast ? env.fastTestCommand : env.testCommand) ?? "", {
-		report: FEEDBACK,
-		label: "Running checks",
-		sweepOnGreen: [ESCALATION, ...options.sweepOnGreen ?? []],
-		...fast ? { preamble: fastSuiteGuard() } : {}
-	});
-};
+const runSuite = (options) => check("health.check", env.testCommand ?? "", {
+	report: FEEDBACK,
+	label: "Running checks",
+	sweepOnGreen: [ESCALATION, ...options.sweepOnGreen ?? []]
+});
 /**
 * Loop until the suite is green: check, and on red run `fix` — escalating
 * first once `FIX_CAP` fixes are spent, or a judge calls the failure
 * identical to the previous round's.
 */
 const healthy = (fix, options = {}) => healthy$1(fix, {
-	check: options.suite === "fast" ? () => untilSettled(() => runSuite(options), unconfigured) : () => runSuite(options),
+	check: () => runSuite(options),
 	report: FEEDBACK,
 	fixCap: 3,
 	fixesSoFar: options.fixesSoFar ?? 0,
@@ -37268,7 +37184,6 @@ const defaults = {
 /** Environment settings. */
 const envDefaults = {
 	testCommand: "npm test",
-	fastTestCommand: "",
 	plannerModel: "smart",
 	coderModel: "base"
 };
@@ -37283,7 +37198,6 @@ const ShippedOptions = Struct({
 	reviewSeverityMinP: setting,
 	qualityReviews: setting,
 	testCommand: setting,
-	fastTestCommand: setting,
 	plannerModel: setting,
 	coderModel: setting
 });
@@ -37303,21 +37217,6 @@ const shipped = (flow, doors, base) => defineWorkflow(standardSchemaV1(ShippedOp
 	base
 }));
 //#endregion
-//#region src/workflows/shared/scenarios.ts
-/** After a turn: stop at `scenario-wording` while wording drifted; accept moves the snapshot. */
-const holdWording = (frozen) => holdWording$1(frozen, (at, drifted) => human("scenario-wording", {
-	message: scenarioWordingMessage(at, drifted),
-	label: "Scenario wording changed",
-	acceptClean: true,
-	base: at
-}));
-/** `turn`, then `holdWording`; `within` names the scope the gate rests in. */
-const guarded = (frozen, turn, within) => async () => {
-	await turn();
-	if (within === void 0) await holdWording(frozen);
-	else await scope(within, () => holdWording(frozen));
-};
-//#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/shared/tail.ts
 /** The reviewer's own `.gtd/REVIEW.md`, kept beside the human's notes so `fix` can tell them apart. */
 const REVIEW_ORIG = ".gtd/REVIEW.orig.md";
@@ -37328,8 +37227,8 @@ const REVIEW_ORIG = ".gtd/REVIEW.orig.md";
 */
 const qualityLap = () => qualityLap$1(lensesOf(vars.qualityReviews ?? ""), reviewQuality, QUALITY);
 /** Resolves `true` once `.gtd/QUALITY.md` is resolved, `false` when the fix cap escalated instead. */
-const fixQualityFindings = (escalations, frozen) => fixFindings({
-	fix: guarded(frozen, fixQuality),
+const fixQualityFindings = (escalations) => fixFindings({
+	fix: fixQuality,
 	findings: QUALITY,
 	cap: 3,
 	escalate: () => escalation(escalations)
@@ -37345,27 +37244,24 @@ const refusePendingHandOff = () => {
 };
 /**
 * The build tail: fix (when entered red), keep green, the quality lap, then
-* `finish` — the human review, as the calling workflow runs it.
+* `finish` — the human review, as the calling workflow runs it. `green`: the
+* caller just left the full suite green (the package loop), so no run opens it.
 */
-const tail = (fixFirst, finish, built) => scope("build", async () => {
-	const frozen = built?.frozen;
+const tail = (fixFirst, finish, green = false) => scope("build", async () => {
 	const escalations = { rounds: 0 };
-	const guardedFix = guarded(frozen, () => fixCheck());
+	const fix = fixCheck;
 	const repair = async () => {
-		await guardedFix();
-		await healthy(guardedFix, {
+		await fix();
+		await healthy(fix, {
 			fixesSoFar: 1,
 			escalations
 		});
 	};
 	if (fixFirst) await repair();
-	else await healthy(guarded(frozen, () => fixCheck(built)), {
-		escalations,
-		sweepOnGreen: [ARCHITECTURE]
-	});
-	if (await qualityLap() === "findings") if (await fixQualityFindings(escalations, frozen)) await healthy(guardedFix, { escalations });
+	else if (!green) await healthy(fix, { escalations });
+	if (await qualityLap() === "findings") if (await fixQualityFindings(escalations)) await healthy(fix, { escalations });
 	else await repair();
-	return finish(escalations, frozen);
+	return finish(escalations);
 });
 /**
 * The review and fix workflows' human review since `base`: a sign-off closes
@@ -37376,7 +37272,7 @@ const handOffReview = (base, escalations) => reviewToHandOff(base, {
 	file: REVIEW,
 	reviewing,
 	fixRisks,
-	keepGreen: () => healthy(() => fixCheck(), { escalations }),
+	keepGreen: () => healthy(fixCheck, { escalations }),
 	awaitReview: (b) => awaitReview(b, handOffAwaitReviewMessage(b)),
 	reviewMissing,
 	close: closeReview,
@@ -37465,8 +37361,6 @@ const deferNotes = (notes, round) => run("review.defer", deferNotesScript(notes,
 });
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/packages.ts
-/** Package 0: the e2e scenarios, written red. */
-const SCENARIO_PACKAGE = ".gtd/packages/00-e2e-scenarios.md";
 const TEST_LINE = /^\s*-\s+(unit|e2e):\s+`([^`]+)`/;
 /** The `## Tests` entries of a package file; malformed lines are ignored. */
 const declaredTests = (packageText) => {
@@ -37496,47 +37390,29 @@ const requireDeclaredTests = (pkg, since) => {
 	if (missing.length === 0) return;
 	refuse(`gtd land: declared-tests: ${pkg} declares tests that are ${satisfied ? "missing from the tree" : "not in the package's diff"} — write them first:\n${missing.map((path) => `  - ${path}`).join("\n")}`);
 };
-/** Build `pkg`, check its declared tests, keep the fast suite green, and close it out, which removes it. */
-const packageItem = async (pkg, frozen) => {
+/**
+* Build `pkg`, check its declared tests, keep the full suite green, and close
+* it out, which removes it — and `.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md` with the last one.
+*/
+const packageItem = async (pkg) => {
 	const from = head$1();
 	const declared = (turn) => async () => {
 		await turn();
 		requireDeclaredTests(pkg, from);
 	};
-	await guarded(frozen, declared(() => build(pkg)))();
-	await healthy(guarded(frozen, declared(fixSuite)), { suite: "fast" });
-	await run("closing", removeScript([pkg, ".gtd/SATISFIED.md"]), { label: "Closing out the package" });
-	return {
+	await declared(() => build(pkg))();
+	await healthy(declared(fixSuite));
+	await run("closing", removeScript([
 		pkg,
-		from,
-		to: head$1()
-	};
+		".gtd/SATISFIED.md",
+		...glob(".gtd/packages/*.md").length === 1 ? [ARCHITECTURE] : []
+	]), { label: "Closing out the package" });
 };
 /** The first queued package — the one a package step works on. */
 const nextPackage = () => [...glob(".gtd/packages/*.md")].sort()[0];
-const outsideGtd = (path) => path !== ".gtd" && !path.startsWith(".gtd/");
 /** Build every package file under `.gtd/packages/`, in name order. */
-const packages = (carried) => scope("packages", async () => {
-	let frozen = carried;
-	const ranges = [];
-	let touched = [];
-	for (let pkg = nextPackage(); pkg !== void 0; pkg = nextPackage()) {
-		const range = await scope("item", () => packageItem(pkg, pkg === ".gtd/packages/00-e2e-scenarios.md" ? void 0 : frozen));
-		ranges.push(range);
-		if (pkg === ".gtd/packages/00-e2e-scenarios.md") {
-			touched = changesSince(range.from).filter((c) => outsideGtd(c.path) && c.status !== "deleted");
-			frozen = freezeScenarios(touched.filter((c) => c.path.endsWith(".feature")).map((c) => c.path), frozen);
-		}
-	}
-	const paths = (status) => touched.filter((c) => c.status === status).map((c) => c.path);
-	return {
-		ranges,
-		scenarios: {
-			added: paths("added"),
-			changed: paths("modified")
-		},
-		frozen
-	};
+const packages = () => scope("packages", async () => {
+	for (let pkg = nextPackage(); pkg !== void 0; pkg = nextPackage()) await scope("item", () => packageItem(pkg));
 });
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/planning.ts
@@ -37569,7 +37445,7 @@ const architecture = () => scope("architecture", async () => {
 	} while (await noteGate(ARCHITECTURE, answerTechnicalQuestions));
 	await decompose();
 	if (changes(".gtd/packages/**").length === 0) refuse("gtd land: decompose: write at least one package under .gtd/packages/");
-	if (changes(".gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md").some((c) => c.status === "deleted")) refuse("gtd land: decompose: keep .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md — the build tail's full run needs it; it is removed only once that run is green");
+	if (changes(".gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md").some((c) => c.status === "deleted")) refuse("gtd land: decompose: keep .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md — the packages are built from it; it is removed with the last package");
 });
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/review.ts
@@ -37695,7 +37571,7 @@ const isCode = (path) => path !== ".gtd" && !path.startsWith(".gtd/");
 * another planning lap, questions are answered in place, nits fixed in one
 * batch, praise dropped.
 */
-const review$1 = (base, escalations = { rounds: 0 }, frozen) => {
+const review$1 = (base, escalations = { rounds: 0 }) => {
 	const severities = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
 	let deferred = [];
 	return review$2(base, {
@@ -37706,8 +37582,8 @@ const review$1 = (base, escalations = { rounds: 0 }, frozen) => {
 			deferred = [];
 			return reviewing(b, carry);
 		},
-		fixRisks: (risks) => guarded(frozen, () => fixRisks(risks), "review")(),
-		keepGreen: () => healthy(guarded(frozen, fixCheck, "review"), { escalations }),
+		fixRisks,
+		keepGreen: () => healthy(fixCheck, { escalations }),
 		awaitReview: (b) => {
 			const notes = deferred;
 			deferred = [];
@@ -37726,7 +37602,7 @@ const review$1 = (base, escalations = { rounds: 0 }, frozen) => {
 			return deferNotes(deferred, head$1());
 		},
 		answerQuestions: answerReviewQuestions,
-		fixNits: (notes) => guarded(frozen, () => fixNits(notes), "review")(),
+		fixNits,
 		close: closeReview,
 		captures: {
 			edits: reviewEditsCapture,
@@ -37748,8 +37624,8 @@ const review$1 = (base, escalations = { rounds: 0 }, frozen) => {
 		}
 	});
 };
-/** The build tail: fix (when entered red), keep green, the quality lap, then human review since `base`. */
-const buildTail = (fixFirst, base, built) => tail(fixFirst, (escalations, frozen) => review$1(base, escalations, frozen), built);
+/** The build tail: fix (when entered red), keep green unless `green`, the quality lap, then human review since `base`. */
+const buildTail = (fixFirst, base, green = false) => tail(fixFirst, (escalations) => review$1(base, escalations), green);
 //#endregion
 //#region src/workflows/feature/feature.ts
 /** Revert the sketch that started the process out of the working tree; its intent survives in history. */
@@ -37776,13 +37652,11 @@ const reUnwind = async (feedback) => {
 /** Plan, build and review until a review round signs off; feedback re-plans from scratch. */
 const planAndBuild = async (firstBase) => {
 	let base = firstBase;
-	let carried;
 	for (;;) {
 		await design(base);
 		await architecture();
-		const built = await packages(carried);
-		carried = built.frozen;
-		const outcome = await buildTail(false, base, built);
+		await packages();
+		const outcome = await buildTail(false, base, true);
 		if (outcome.verdict === "signoff") return;
 		await reUnwind(outcome);
 		base = outcome.base;
@@ -37918,4 +37792,4 @@ var workflows_default = feature;
 */
 const doors = {};
 //#endregion
-export { ARCHITECTURE, ESCALATION, FEEDBACK, FIX_CAP, QUALITY, REQUIREMENTS, REVIEW, REVIEW_ORIG, SCENARIO_PACKAGE, SETUP, ShippedOptions, access, afterTail, agentWithSkills, answerProductQuestions, answerReviewQuestions, answerTechnicalQuestions, architecture, author, awaitReview, base, baseline, build, buildTail, builtInLenses, closeReview, coder, collecting, declaredTests, decompose, workflows_default as default, defaults, deferNotes, describeEscalation, design, doors, driftedScenarios, envDefaults, escalate, escalation, escalationExhausted, fastSuiteGuard, feature, fix, fixCheck, fixFlow, fixNits, fixQuality, fixQualityFindings, fixReviewNotes, fixRisks, fixSuite, freezeScenarios, gate, guarded, handOffReview, handOffTail, healthy, holdWording, lensesOf, nextPackage, ordinaryStart, packageItem, packages, planAndBuild, planner, qualityLap, reUnwind, requireDeclaredTests, retryQuestion, review, reviewFlow, reviewMissing, reviewQuality, reviewing, scenarioText, skills, steering, summary, tail, threads, triage, unwind, wordingDrift };
+export { ARCHITECTURE, ESCALATION, FEEDBACK, FIX_CAP, QUALITY, REQUIREMENTS, REVIEW, REVIEW_ORIG, ShippedOptions, access, afterTail, agentWithSkills, answerProductQuestions, answerReviewQuestions, answerTechnicalQuestions, architecture, author, awaitReview, base, baseline, build, buildTail, builtInLenses, closeReview, coder, collecting, declaredTests, decompose, workflows_default as default, defaults, deferNotes, describeEscalation, design, doors, envDefaults, escalate, escalation, escalationExhausted, feature, fix, fixCheck, fixFlow, fixNits, fixQuality, fixQualityFindings, fixReviewNotes, fixRisks, fixSuite, gate, handOffReview, handOffTail, healthy, lensesOf, nextPackage, ordinaryStart, packageItem, packages, planAndBuild, planner, qualityLap, reUnwind, requireDeclaredTests, retryQuestion, review, reviewFlow, reviewMissing, reviewQuality, reviewing, skills, steering, summary, tail, threads, triage, unwind };