@openpresentation/opf 0.1.0 → 0.2.1

package/dist/spec/catalogs/tones/index.json

@@ -1,49 +1,49 @@
-{
-  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone-index/v1",
-  "version": "1",
-  "description": "Catalog of presentation tones available in the openpresentation.org catalog. Each entry is a lightweight summary; full tone records (voice cues, anti-patterns, sample phrases) live in the per-id JSON files alongside this index. Tones are referenced from OPF documents via tone.",
-  "records": [
-    {
-      "id": "formal",
-      "name": "Formal",
-      "summary": "Polished, restrained voice for board, investor, and regulator audiences.",
-      "file": "formal.json"
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "casual",
-      "name": "Casual",
-      "summary": "Warm, plain-spoken voice for internal updates and customer storytelling.",
-      "file": "casual.json"
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "inspirational",
-      "name": "Inspirational",
-      "summary": "Aspirational, narrative-driven voice for keynotes, founders, and rallying cries.",
-      "file": "inspirational.json"
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "technical",
-      "name": "Technical",
-      "summary": "Precise, evidence-led voice for engineering, research, and product-detail audiences.",
-      "file": "technical.json"
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "persuasive",
-      "name": "Persuasive",
-      "summary": "Argument-led voice for sales, fundraising, and recommendation-driven decks.",
-      "file": "persuasive.json"
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "authoritative",
-      "name": "Authoritative",
-      "summary": "Expert, declarative voice for category-defining and analyst-style decks.",
-      "file": "authoritative.json"
-    },
-    {
-      "id": "conversational",
-      "name": "Conversational",
-      "summary": "Direct, dialog-style voice for podcasts, fireside chats, and small-group reviews.",
-      "file": "conversational.json"
-    }
-  ]
-}
+{
+  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone-index/v1",
+  "version": "1",
+  "description": "Catalog of presentation tones available in the openpresentation.org catalog. Each entry is a lightweight summary; full tone records (voice cues, anti-patterns, sample phrases) live in the per-id JSON files alongside this index. Tones are referenced from OPF documents via tone.",
+  "records": [
+    {
+      "id": "formal",
+      "name": "Formal",
+      "summary": "Polished, restrained voice for board, investor, and regulator audiences.",
+      "file": "formal.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "casual",
+      "name": "Casual",
+      "summary": "Warm, plain-spoken voice for internal updates and customer storytelling.",
+      "file": "casual.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "inspirational",
+      "name": "Inspirational",
+      "summary": "Aspirational, narrative-driven voice for keynotes, founders, and rallying cries.",
+      "file": "inspirational.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "technical",
+      "name": "Technical",
+      "summary": "Precise, evidence-led voice for engineering, research, and product-detail audiences.",
+      "file": "technical.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "persuasive",
+      "name": "Persuasive",
+      "summary": "Argument-led voice for sales, fundraising, and recommendation-driven decks.",
+      "file": "persuasive.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "authoritative",
+      "name": "Authoritative",
+      "summary": "Expert, declarative voice for category-defining and analyst-style decks.",
+      "file": "authoritative.json"
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "conversational",
+      "name": "Conversational",
+      "summary": "Direct, dialog-style voice for podcasts, fireside chats, and small-group reviews.",
+      "file": "conversational.json"
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/dist/spec/catalogs/tones/inspirational.json

@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
-{
-  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1",
-  "id": "inspirational",
-  "name": "Inspirational",
-  "summary": "Aspirational, narrative-driven voice for keynotes, founders, and rallying cries.",
-  "description": "Reach for shared belief and possibility, then ground it in something concrete. Use vivid imagery and rhythm; avoid collapsing into hype by always pairing aspiration with a real anchor.",
-  "voiceCues": [
-    "Open with belief; close with action.",
-    "Use rhythm — paired phrases, repetition, deliberate beats.",
-    "Pair every aspirational claim with a concrete proof point.",
-    "Speak in present tense to make the future feel inevitable."
-  ],
-  "avoid": [
-    "Empty hype without evidence.",
-    "Stacked superlatives ('the very best, world-changing, revolutionary').",
-    "Cynical or hedging language.",
-    "Dense data tables — push numbers into supporting slides."
-  ],
-  "samplePhrases": [
-    "We're building the runtime that makes agents feel instant.",
-    "When latency disappears, what becomes possible?",
-    "The next decade of software belongs to teams who treat speed as a feature."
-  ],
-  "recommendedNarratives": [
-    "golden-circle",
-    "conference-talk",
-    "venture-pitch",
-    "company-intro"
-  ],
-  "tags": ["motivational", "keynote", "founder"]
-}
+{
+  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1",
+  "id": "inspirational",
+  "name": "Inspirational",
+  "summary": "Aspirational, narrative-driven voice for keynotes, founders, and rallying cries.",
+  "description": "Reach for shared belief and possibility, then ground it in something concrete. Use vivid imagery and rhythm; avoid collapsing into hype by always pairing aspiration with a real anchor.",
+  "voiceCues": [
+    "Open with belief; close with action.",
+    "Use rhythm — paired phrases, repetition, deliberate beats.",
+    "Pair every aspirational claim with a concrete proof point.",
+    "Speak in present tense to make the future feel inevitable."
+  ],
+  "avoid": [
+    "Empty hype without evidence.",
+    "Stacked superlatives ('the very best, world-changing, revolutionary').",
+    "Cynical or hedging language.",
+    "Dense data tables — push numbers into supporting slides."
+  ],
+  "samplePhrases": [
+    "We're building the runtime that makes agents feel instant.",
+    "When latency disappears, what becomes possible?",
+    "The next decade of software belongs to teams who treat speed as a feature."
+  ],
+  "recommendedNarratives": [
+    "golden-circle",
+    "conference-talk",
+    "venture-pitch",
+    "company-intro"
+  ],
+  "tags": ["motivational", "keynote", "founder"]
+}

package/dist/spec/catalogs/tones/persuasive.json

@@ -1,32 +1,32 @@
-{
-  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1",
-  "id": "persuasive",
-  "name": "Persuasive",
-  "summary": "Argument-led voice for sales, fundraising, and recommendation-driven decks.",
-  "description": "Frame every section as an argument that builds toward an ask. Surface objections, answer them, and pair claims with the strongest available proof. Read more like a memo than a report.",
-  "voiceCues": [
-    "Lead each section with the claim it's making.",
-    "Surface the strongest counter-argument and address it.",
-    "Pair every claim with proof — customer, benchmark, or analyst.",
-    "End on a clear ask with named owner and date."
-  ],
-  "avoid": [
-    "Buried leads.",
-    "Symmetrical 'on one hand / on the other' framing without a verdict.",
-    "Information for its own sake — every chart should advance the argument.",
-    "Passive endings without a clear ask."
-  ],
-  "samplePhrases": [
-    "Adopting our runtime cuts inference latency 8× while preserving accuracy.",
-    "The most common objection — 'we'll be locked in' — is addressed by our open OPF spec.",
-    "We're asking for a $30M Series B to ship into the enterprise tier."
-  ],
-  "recommendedNarratives": [
-    "pitch-deck",
-    "venture-pitch",
-    "early-startup-pitch",
-    "persuasive-sales",
-    "project-proposal"
-  ],
-  "tags": ["sales", "pitch", "argumentative"]
-}
+{
+  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1",
+  "id": "persuasive",
+  "name": "Persuasive",
+  "summary": "Argument-led voice for sales, fundraising, and recommendation-driven decks.",
+  "description": "Frame every section as an argument that builds toward an ask. Surface objections, answer them, and pair claims with the strongest available proof. Read more like a memo than a report.",
+  "voiceCues": [
+    "Lead each section with the claim it's making.",
+    "Surface the strongest counter-argument and address it.",
+    "Pair every claim with proof — customer, benchmark, or analyst.",
+    "End on a clear ask with named owner and date."
+  ],
+  "avoid": [
+    "Buried leads.",
+    "Symmetrical 'on one hand / on the other' framing without a verdict.",
+    "Information for its own sake — every chart should advance the argument.",
+    "Passive endings without a clear ask."
+  ],
+  "samplePhrases": [
+    "Adopting our runtime cuts inference latency 8× while preserving accuracy.",
+    "The most common objection — 'we'll be locked in' — is addressed by our open OPF spec.",
+    "We're asking for a $30M Series B to ship into the enterprise tier."
+  ],
+  "recommendedNarratives": [
+    "pitch-deck",
+    "venture-pitch",
+    "early-startup-pitch",
+    "persuasive-sales",
+    "project-proposal"
+  ],
+  "tags": ["sales", "pitch", "argumentative"]
+}

package/dist/spec/catalogs/tones/technical.json

@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
-{
-  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1",
-  "id": "technical",
-  "name": "Technical",
-  "summary": "Precise, evidence-led voice for engineering, research, and product-detail audiences.",
-  "description": "Lead with the question or claim, then walk through the mechanism and the numbers. Use exact terminology; assume the audience can handle and prefers it. Diagrams, tables, and benchmarks are first-class.",
-  "voiceCues": [
-    "State the claim, then the mechanism, then the evidence.",
-    "Use exact terminology — don't soften technical terms for general readability.",
-    "Quote benchmarks with conditions (cold/warm, p50/p95/p99, dataset, hardware).",
-    "Prefer diagrams and tables over prose paragraphs for structural information."
-  ],
-  "avoid": [
-    "Vague claims ('much faster', 'better', 'easier').",
-    "Marketing framing without supporting data.",
-    "Glossing over caveats and tradeoffs.",
-    "Casual register that obscures precision."
-  ],
-  "samplePhrases": [
-    "p95 inference latency is 38ms on a single A100, down from 312ms on the prior runtime.",
-    "We replaced the streaming serializer with a batched protobuf path; throughput rose 4.2× under load.",
-    "The result holds for context windows up to 32k tokens; beyond that, see appendix B."
-  ],
-  "recommendedNarratives": [
-    "challenge-resolution",
-    "innovation",
-    "conference-talk",
-    "engineering-update"
-  ],
-  "tags": ["technical", "engineering", "research"]
-}
+{
+  "$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1",
+  "id": "technical",
+  "name": "Technical",
+  "summary": "Precise, evidence-led voice for engineering, research, and product-detail audiences.",
+  "description": "Lead with the question or claim, then walk through the mechanism and the numbers. Use exact terminology; assume the audience can handle and prefers it. Diagrams, tables, and benchmarks are first-class.",
+  "voiceCues": [
+    "State the claim, then the mechanism, then the evidence.",
+    "Use exact terminology — don't soften technical terms for general readability.",
+    "Quote benchmarks with conditions (cold/warm, p50/p95/p99, dataset, hardware).",
+    "Prefer diagrams and tables over prose paragraphs for structural information."
+  ],
+  "avoid": [
+    "Vague claims ('much faster', 'better', 'easier').",
+    "Marketing framing without supporting data.",
+    "Glossing over caveats and tradeoffs.",
+    "Casual register that obscures precision."
+  ],
+  "samplePhrases": [
+    "p95 inference latency is 38ms on a single A100, down from 312ms on the prior runtime.",
+    "We replaced the streaming serializer with a batched protobuf path; throughput rose 4.2× under load.",
+    "The result holds for context windows up to 32k tokens; beyond that, see appendix B."
+  ],
+  "recommendedNarratives": [
+    "challenge-resolution",
+    "innovation",
+    "conference-talk",
+    "engineering-update"
+  ],
+  "tags": ["technical", "engineering", "research"]
+}