@opengsd/gsd-pi 1.2.0-dev.84c56d87 → 1.2.0-dev.8e6112e9

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/consent-question.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+/**
+ * Consent Question module — the single home for the user-question lifecycle:
+ * classification → gating → answer validation → cancellation.
+ *
+ * Every question the assistant puts to a human is classified into a kind, and
+ * the kind alone decides the fail policy:
+ *
+ *   - "gate"          — mechanical write gates (depth verification, destructive
+ *                       confirm). Fail-closed; structural answer validation is
+ *                       delegated to the write-gate validators.
+ *   - "consent"       — approval/confirmation questions ("ready to write?",
+ *                       "is this correct?"). Fail-closed.
+ *   - "decision"      — explicit user decisions (research vs skip). Fail-closed.
+ *   - "informational" — anything that is not asking the user to consent or
+ *                       decide. Fail-open.
+ *
+ * Fail-closed means an empty/missing answer is NEVER treated as an answer —
+ * evaluateAnswer returns "waiting" so callers pause instead of proceeding.
+ * This fixes #528 (empty `selected` on a non-gate question used to pass
+ * through as a real answer) by construction.
+ *
+ * shouldPauseForQuestion replaces the old unit-type allowlist: a classified
+ * consent/decision question pauses regardless of unit type, including
+ * interactive mode where no unit is active. This fixes #682 (prose approval
+ * questions outside the 4 allowlisted discuss units rendered as un-gated
+ * prose menus) by construction.
+ */
+
+import { isGateQuestionId } from "./bootstrap/write-gate.js";
+import {
+  evaluateGateAnswer,
+  hasNotesValue,
+  hasSelectedValue,
+  type VerdictAnswerDetails,
+  type VerdictQuestionShape,
+} from "./consent-verdict.js";
+import { isDestructiveConfirmGateId } from "./safety/destructive-confirmation.js";
+
+// ── Taxonomy ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+export type QuestionKind = "gate" | "consent" | "decision" | "informational";
+
+export type GateSubKind = "depth-verification" | "approval" | "destructive-confirm";
+
+export type FailPolicy = "closed" | "open";
+
+export type AnswerOutcome = "waiting" | "answered" | "verified" | "declined" | "cancelled";
+
+export interface ClassifiedQuestion {
+  kind: QuestionKind;
+  gateSubKind?: GateSubKind;
+}
+
+/** Fail policy is derived from the kind — there is no per-question override. */
+export function failPolicyForKind(kind: QuestionKind): FailPolicy {
+  return kind === "informational" ? "open" : "closed";
+}
+
+// ── Prose detectors (moved from user-input-boundary) ────────────────────────
+
+const REMOTE_QUESTION_FAILURE_RE =
+  /(?:Remote (?:auth failed|questions failed|channel configured but returned no result|questions timed out|questions timed out or failed)|Failed to send questions via)/i;
+
+const APPROVAL_WAIT_RE =
+  /\bwait(?:ing)?\s+for\s+(?:your\s+)?(?:confirmation|approval|input|response|answer)\b/i;
+
+const APPROVAL_QUESTION_RE =
+  /\b(?:confirm|confirmation|approve|approval|approved|captured|correct|correctly|happy\s+with|ready\s+to\s+(?:write|save|proceed|ship)|(?:want|need)\s+to\s+adjust|should\s+I\s+(?:write|save|proceed)|do\s+you\s+want\s+me\s+to\s+(?:write|save|proceed)|ship\s+it)\b/i;
+
+const APPROVAL_RIGHT_QUESTION_RE =
+  /\b(?:does|do|is|are|was|were|did)\b[^\n?]{0,120}\bright\b/i;
+
+const APPROVAL_CHANGE_QUESTION_RE =
+  /\b(?:anything\s+else|anything|something)\s+to\s+(?:adjust|add|remove|reclassify)\b/i;
+
+const RESEARCH_DECISION_QUESTION_RE =
+  /\b(?:research|skip)\b/i;
+
+const ASK_USER_QUESTIONS_CANCELLED_RE =
+  /ask_user_questions was cancelled before receiving a response/i;
+
+/** Scan question-mark-terminated fragments of `text` against `patterns`. */
+function hasQuestionMatching(text: string, patterns: RegExp[]): boolean {
+  for (let i = 0; i < text.length; i++) {
+    if (text[i] !== "?") continue;
+    const previousBreak = Math.max(
+      text.lastIndexOf("\n", i),
+      text.lastIndexOf(".", i),
+      text.lastIndexOf("!", i),
+      text.lastIndexOf("?", i - 1),
+    );
+    const fragment = text.slice(previousBreak + 1, i + 1);
+    if (patterns.some((pattern) => pattern.test(fragment))) return true;
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+export function hasApprovalQuestion(text: string): boolean {
+  return hasQuestionMatching(text, [
+    APPROVAL_QUESTION_RE,
+    APPROVAL_RIGHT_QUESTION_RE,
+    APPROVAL_CHANGE_QUESTION_RE,
+  ]);
+}
+
+export function hasResearchDecisionQuestion(text: string): boolean {
+  return hasQuestionMatching(text, [RESEARCH_DECISION_QUESTION_RE]);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Detect a plain-text "Next steps:" menu — numbered options with an "Other"
+ * choice — emitted as prose instead of a structured ask_user_questions call.
+ * Without this, auto-mode treats the menu as informational and loops on its
+ * own turn until tokens are exhausted (#454).
+ */
+export function hasPlainTextNextStepsMenu(lines: string[]): boolean {
+  const nextStepsIndex = lines.findIndex((line) => /^next steps\s*:?$/i.test(line));
+  if (nextStepsIndex < 0) return false;
+  const menuLines = lines.slice(nextStepsIndex + 1);
+  const numberedOptions = menuLines.filter((line) => /^\d+[.)]\s+\S/.test(line));
+  return numberedOptions.length >= 2 && numberedOptions.some((line) => /\bother\b/i.test(line));
+}
+
+// ── Message text extraction (moved from user-input-boundary) ────────────────
+
+function extractMessageText(msg: unknown, includeThinking: boolean): string {
+  if (!msg || typeof msg !== "object") return "";
+  const content = (msg as { content?: unknown }).content;
+  if (typeof content === "string") return content;
+  if (!Array.isArray(content)) return "";
+  const parts: string[] = [];
+  for (const block of content) {
+    if (!block || typeof block !== "object") continue;
+    const typed = block as { type?: unknown; text?: unknown; thinking?: unknown };
+    if (typed.type === "text" && typeof typed.text === "string") {
+      parts.push(typed.text);
+    }
+    // Thinking blocks are internal reasoning, not user-visible — included only
+    // when the caller asks for the full transcript text.
+    if (includeThinking && typed.type === "thinking" && typeof typed.thinking === "string") {
+      parts.push(typed.thinking);
+    }
+  }
+  return parts.join("\n");
+}
+
+function lastAssistantMessageText(
+  messages: unknown[] | null | undefined,
+  includeThinking: boolean,
+): string {
+  if (!Array.isArray(messages)) return "";
+  for (let i = messages.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+    const msg = messages[i];
+    if (!msg || typeof msg !== "object") continue;
+    if ((msg as { role?: unknown }).role !== "assistant") continue;
+    const text = extractMessageText(msg, includeThinking).trim();
+    if (text) return text;
+  }
+  return "";
+}
+
+export function lastAssistantText(messages: unknown[] | null | undefined): string {
+  return lastAssistantMessageText(messages, true);
+}
+
+function lastAssistantVisibleText(messages: unknown[] | null | undefined): string {
+  return lastAssistantMessageText(messages, false);
+}
+
+function anyMessageMatches(messages: unknown[] | undefined, patterns: RegExp[]): boolean {
+  if (!Array.isArray(messages)) return false;
+  return messages.some((msg) => {
+    if (!msg || typeof msg !== "object") return false;
+    if ((msg as { role?: unknown }).role === "user") return false;
+    const text = extractMessageText(msg, false);
+    return patterns.some((pattern) => pattern.test(text));
+  });
+}
+
+// ── Classification ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const APPROVAL_GATE_ID_RE = /^depth_verification_.+_confirm$/;
+
+export interface ClassifyQuestionInput {
+  /** ask_user_questions question id, when classifying a structured question. */
+  id?: unknown;
+  /** Question options, when classifying a structured question. */
+  options?: Array<{ label?: string }> | undefined;
+  /** Prose text, when classifying a streamed text boundary. */
+  text?: string;
+  /** Active unit type, used to pick the prose detector for decisions. */
+  unitType?: string;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Classify a question — structured (by id) or prose (by text) — into a kind.
+ *
+ * Structured questions with a recognized gate id are gates; every other
+ * structured question is asking the user something, so it classifies as
+ * consent (fail-closed). Prose classifies by the approval/decision detectors;
+ * prose that matches neither is informational (fail-open).
+ */
+export function classifyQuestion(input: ClassifyQuestionInput): ClassifiedQuestion {
+  if (isDestructiveConfirmGateId(input.id)) {
+    return { kind: "gate", gateSubKind: "destructive-confirm" };
+  }
+  if (typeof input.id === "string" && isGateQuestionId(input.id)) {
+    return {
+      kind: "gate",
+      gateSubKind: APPROVAL_GATE_ID_RE.test(input.id) ? "approval" : "depth-verification",
+    };
+  }
+  // Any other structured question is a real elicitation of the user.
+  if (typeof input.id === "string" || Array.isArray(input.options)) {
+    return { kind: "consent" };
+  }
+  const text = input.text ?? "";
+  if (input.unitType === "research-decision" && hasResearchDecisionQuestion(text)) {
+    return { kind: "decision" };
+  }
+  if (hasApprovalQuestion(text)) {
+    return { kind: "consent" };
+  }
+  return { kind: "informational" };
+}
+
+// ── Answer validation ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+// The question/answer shapes are the consent-verdict leaf's shapes — one
+// definition shared with write-gate so the two consumers cannot drift.
+export type ConsentQuestionShape = VerdictQuestionShape;
+export type ConsentAnswerDetails = VerdictAnswerDetails;
+
+/**
+ * THE single policy point for whether a question's answer counts as answered.
+ *
+ * - cancelled rounds → "cancelled" for every kind.
+ * - gate: delegates to evaluateGateAnswer in the consent-verdict leaf — the
+ *   same verdict engine write-gate's applyAskUserQuestionsGateResult consumes;
+ *   confirm option → "verified", any other real selection → "declined",
+ *   empty/missing → "waiting" (fail-closed).
+ * - consent/decision: a non-empty selection or non-empty notes → "answered";
+ *   empty/missing → "waiting" (fail-closed; fixes #528).
+ * - informational: always "answered" (fail-open).
+ */
+export function evaluateAnswer(options: {
+  question: ConsentQuestionShape;
+  details: ConsentAnswerDetails;
+}): AnswerOutcome {
+  const { question, details } = options;
+  if (details.cancelled) return "cancelled";
+
+  const { kind } = classifyQuestion({ id: question.id, options: question.options });
+  if (failPolicyForKind(kind) === "open") return "answered";
+
+  if (kind === "gate") {
+    // Gates keep strict structural validation: only the confirmation option
+    // verifies; notes never satisfy a gate.
+    return evaluateGateAnswer(question, details);
+  }
+
+  const questionId = typeof question.id === "string" ? question.id : "";
+  const answer = details.response?.answers?.[questionId];
+
+  if (hasSelectedValue(answer?.selected)) return "answered";
+  // Notes-only is a real user utterance for consent/decision questions, but
+  // never for gates (handled above).
+  if (hasNotesValue(answer?.notes)) return "answered";
+  return "waiting";
+}
+
+const OUTCOME_PRECEDENCE: AnswerOutcome[] = [
+  "cancelled",
+  "waiting",
+  "declined",
+  "verified",
+  "answered",
+];
+
+/**
+ * Evaluate a whole ask_user_questions round. The round outcome is the most
+ * blocking per-question outcome (cancelled > waiting > declined > verified >
+ * answered). An empty round with a response is "answered"; an empty round
+ * without a response is "waiting" only when cancelled is not set and there is
+ * nothing to validate — callers treat a missing response with no questions as
+ * a no-op, so it reports "answered" here.
+ */
+export function evaluateAskUserQuestionsRound(
+  questions: ConsentQuestionShape[],
+  details: ConsentAnswerDetails,
+): AnswerOutcome {
+  if (details.cancelled) return "cancelled";
+  let worst: AnswerOutcome = "answered";
+  for (const question of questions) {
+    const outcome = evaluateAnswer({ question, details });
+    if (OUTCOME_PRECEDENCE.indexOf(outcome) < OUTCOME_PRECEDENCE.indexOf(worst)) {
+      worst = outcome;
+    }
+  }
+  return worst;
+}
+
+export function formatUnansweredConsentQuestionMessage(questions: ConsentQuestionShape[]): string {
+  const ids = questions
+    .map((question) => (typeof question.id === "string" ? question.id : null))
+    .filter((id): id is string => Boolean(id));
+  return [
+    `ask_user_questions returned without a selection${ids.length ? ` for ${ids.join(", ")}` : ""}.`,
+    "An empty answer is not consent — do not infer approval or proceed.",
+    "Re-call ask_user_questions with the same question(s) and wait for the user's response.",
+  ].join(" ");
+}
+
+// ── Pause gating (replaces the unit-type allowlist) ─────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * Shared preamble for the awaiting-input predicates: cancellation and remote
+ * delivery failures always pause (an undelivered question can never be
+ * answered, so proceeding would be fail-open), as does an explicit
+ * "waiting for your approval/input" phrase in the last assistant text.
+ *
+ * Returns `forced: true` when the boundary is unconditional, plus the last
+ * assistant visible text for the caller's own classification.
+ */
+function awaitingBoundary(messages: unknown[] | undefined): { forced: boolean; text: string } {
+  if (anyMessageMatches(messages, [ASK_USER_QUESTIONS_CANCELLED_RE, REMOTE_QUESTION_FAILURE_RE])) {
+    return { forced: true, text: "" };
+  }
+  const text = lastAssistantVisibleText(messages);
+  if (text && APPROVAL_WAIT_RE.test(text)) return { forced: true, text };
+  return { forced: false, text };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Decide whether the assistant should pause for a prose user question.
+ *
+ * Unlike the retired USER_APPROVAL_UNIT_TYPES allowlist, this pauses for any
+ * classified consent/decision question regardless of unit type — including
+ * interactive mode where no unit is active (#682).
+ */
+export function shouldPauseForQuestion(
+  unitType: string | undefined,
+  messages: unknown[] | undefined,
+): boolean {
+  const { forced, text } = awaitingBoundary(messages);
+  if (forced) return true;
+  // Streaming hot path: this runs on every message_update for every unit type.
+  // The classifiers only ever match question-mark-terminated fragments, so
+  // text without a "?" can never classify as consent/decision — bail before
+  // the multi-regex scan.
+  if (!text || !text.includes("?")) return false;
+  const { kind } = classifyQuestion({ text, unitType });
+  return kind === "consent" || kind === "decision";
+}
+
+// ── Awaiting-input boundaries (moved from user-input-boundary) ──────────────
+
+export function isAwaitingUserInput(messages: unknown[] | undefined): boolean {
+  const { forced, text } = awaitingBoundary(messages);
+  if (forced) return true;
+  if (!text) return false;
+  const lines = text.split(/\r?\n/).map((line) => line.trim()).filter(Boolean);
+  if (lines.some((line) => line.endsWith("?"))) return true;
+  if (hasPlainTextNextStepsMenu(lines)) return true;
+  return hasApprovalQuestion(text);
+}
+
+export function isAwaitingApprovalBoundary(messages: unknown[] | undefined): boolean {
+  // With no unit type, classification reduces to the approval detectors —
+  // exactly the approval boundary.
+  return shouldPauseForQuestion(undefined, messages);
+}
+
+// ── Approval gate ids + explicit responses (moved from user-input-boundary) ─
+
+export function approvalGateIdForUnit(
+  unitType: string | undefined,
+  unitId?: string | null,
+): string | null {
+  if (!unitType) return null;
+  if (unitType === "discuss-project") return "depth_verification_project_confirm";
+  if (unitType === "discuss-requirements") return "depth_verification_requirements_confirm";
+  if (unitType === "research-decision") return "depth_verification_research_decision_confirm";
+  if (unitType === "discuss-milestone") {
+    const safeUnitId = typeof unitId === "string" && /^[A-Za-z0-9_-]+$/.test(unitId)
+      ? unitId
+      : "milestone";
+    return `depth_verification_${safeUnitId}_confirm`;
+  }
+  return null;
+}
+
+const CHANGE_REQUEST_RESPONSE_RE =
+  /\b(?:no|nope|nah|not\s+yet|don't|do\s+not|change|add|remove|reclassify|adjust|clarify|missing|instead|but|however|wait|hold)\b/i;
+
+const APPROVAL_RESPONSE_RE =
+  /^(?:y|yes|yeah|yep|approve|approved|confirm|confirmed|correct|right|looks\s+(?:good|right)|sounds\s+good|all\s+good|ok|okay|go\s+ahead|proceed|write\s+it|save\s+it|do\s+it)\b/i;
+
+const RESEARCH_DECISION_RESPONSE_RE =
+  /^(?:research|run\s+research|do\s+research|skip|skip\s+research|no\s+research)\b/i;
+
+export function isExplicitApprovalResponse(
+  input: string | undefined,
+  pendingGateId?: string | null,
+): boolean {
+  const text = input?.trim() ?? "";
+  if (!text) return false;
+  if (pendingGateId?.includes("research_decision")) {
+    return RESEARCH_DECISION_RESPONSE_RE.test(text);
+  }
+  if (CHANGE_REQUEST_RESPONSE_RE.test(text)) return false;
+  return APPROVAL_RESPONSE_RE.test(text);
+}
+
+/** True when an assistant message already has an in-flight ask_user_questions tool call. */
+export function messageHasPendingAskUserQuestionsTool(message: unknown): boolean {
+  if (!message || typeof message !== "object") return false;
+  const content = (message as { content?: unknown }).content;
+  if (!Array.isArray(content)) return false;
+  return content.some((block) => {
+    if (!block || typeof block !== "object") return false;
+    // Claude Code marks completion by attaching externalResult, not by setting state.
+    // Streaming blocks often carry no state; serverToolUse is the claude-code-cli MCP path.
+    const tool = block as { type?: string; name?: string; state?: string; externalResult?: unknown };
+    if (tool.type !== "toolCall" && tool.type !== "serverToolUse") return false;
+    const name = String(tool.name ?? "").toLowerCase();
+    if (!name.includes("ask_user_questions")) return false;
+    if (tool.externalResult !== undefined) return false;
+    return tool.state !== "completed" && tool.state !== "done";
+  });
+}

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/consent-verdict.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/**
+ * Consent verdict leaf — the single per-question verdict engine shared by the
+ * write gate (bootstrap/write-gate.ts) and the Consent Question module
+ * (consent-question.ts).
+ *
+ * This module is a dependency leaf on purpose: write-gate consumes
+ * evaluateGateAnswer here while consent-question imports write-gate's id
+ * predicates, so putting the verdict anywhere else would create an import
+ * cycle. It must not import from either module (ADR-039).
+ */
+
+export type GateAnswerVerdict = "waiting" | "verified" | "declined" | "cancelled";
+
+export interface VerdictQuestionShape {
+  id?: unknown;
+  options?: Array<{ label?: string }>;
+}
+
+export interface VerdictAnswerDetails {
+  cancelled?: boolean;
+  interrupted?: boolean;
+  response?: {
+    answers?: Record<string, { selected?: unknown; notes?: unknown } | undefined>;
+  } | null;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Check whether a depth_verification answer confirms the discussion is complete.
+ * Uses structural validation: the selected answer must exactly match the first
+ * option label from the question definition (the confirmation option by convention).
+ * This rejects free-form "Other" text, decline options, and garbage input without
+ * coupling to any specific label substring.
+ *
+ * @param selected  The answer's selected value from details.response.answers[id].selected
+ * @param options   The question's options array from event.input.questions[n].options
+ */
+export function isDepthConfirmationAnswer(
+  selected: unknown,
+  options?: Array<{ label?: string }>,
+): boolean {
+  const value = Array.isArray(selected) ? selected[0] : selected;
+  if (typeof value !== "string" || !value) return false;
+
+  // If options are available, structurally validate: selected must exactly match
+  // the first option (confirmation) label. Rejects free-form "Other" and decline options.
+  if (Array.isArray(options) && options.length > 0) {
+    const confirmLabel = options[0]?.label;
+    return typeof confirmLabel === "string" && value === confirmLabel;
+  }
+
+  // Fail-closed: no options means we cannot structurally validate the answer.
+  // Returning false prevents any free-form string from unlocking the gate.
+  return false;
+}
+
+export function hasSelectedValue(selected: unknown): boolean {
+  if (Array.isArray(selected)) {
+    return selected.some((value) => typeof value === "string" && value.length > 0);
+  }
+  return typeof selected === "string" && selected.length > 0;
+}
+
+export function hasNotesValue(notes: unknown): boolean {
+  return typeof notes === "string" && notes.trim().length > 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * THE per-question verdict for gate questions (fail-closed):
+ *
+ * - cancelled rounds → "cancelled".
+ * - the confirmation option (structural match) → "verified".
+ * - any other real selection → "declined".
+ * - empty/missing selection → "waiting" — an empty answer is NEVER an answer,
+ *   so notes can never satisfy a gate either.
+ */
+export function evaluateGateAnswer(
+  question: VerdictQuestionShape,
+  details: VerdictAnswerDetails,
+): GateAnswerVerdict {
+  if (details.cancelled) return "cancelled";
+  const questionId = typeof question.id === "string" ? question.id : "";
+  const answer = details.response?.answers?.[questionId];
+  if (isDepthConfirmationAnswer(answer?.selected, question.options)) return "verified";
+  if (hasSelectedValue(answer?.selected)) return "declined";
+  return "waiting";
+}

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/constants.ts

@@ -9,9 +9,6 @@
 /** Default timeout for verification-gate commands (ms). */
 export const DEFAULT_COMMAND_TIMEOUT_MS = 120_000;
 
-/** Default timeout for the dynamic bash tool (seconds). */
-export const DEFAULT_BASH_TIMEOUT_SECS = 120;
-
 // ─── Cache Sizes ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
 /** Max directory-listing cache entries before eviction (#611). */

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/crash-recovery.ts

@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ export function writeLock(
  * stale session-file pointer.
  */
 export function clearLock(basePath: string): void {
+  const legacyLock = readLegacyLock(basePath);
   clearLegacyLockFile(basePath);
 
   if (!isDbAvailable()) return;
@@ -235,8 +236,15 @@ export function clearLock(basePath: string): void {
       deleteRuntimeKv("worker", staleWorker.worker_id, SESSION_FILE_KV_KEY);
       return;
     }
-    const lock = readLegacyLock(basePath);
-    if (lock?.pid) markWorkerStoppingByPid(projectRoot, lock.pid);
+    if (legacyLock?.pid) {
+      markWorkerStoppingByPid(projectRoot, legacyLock.pid);
+      const workerByLegacyPid = getAllAutoWorkers().find(
+        (w) =>
+          w.pid === legacyLock.pid
+          && normalizeRealPath(w.project_root_realpath) === projectRoot,
+      );
+      if (workerByLegacyPid) forceReleaseLeasesForWorker(workerByLegacyPid.worker_id);
+    }
     const worker = findActiveWorkerForCurrentProcess(projectRoot);
     if (worker) deleteRuntimeKv("worker", worker.worker_id, SESSION_FILE_KV_KEY);
 

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/db/engine.ts

@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
 // Project/App: gsd-pi
 // File Purpose: GSD engine — connection ownership, lifecycle, schema/migrations,
 // and transaction primitives for the single-writer layer. The shared handle
-// (currentDb) lives here; writers (db/writers/*) and the Query Module
-// (db/queries.ts) read it through getDb()/getDbOrNull().
+// (currentDb) lives here; domain writers, allowlisted coordination/runtime
+// writers, schema/migration helpers, and the Query Module (db/queries.ts) read
+// it through getDb()/getDbOrNull().
 //
 // This file legitimately holds DDL and BEGIN/COMMIT control, so it is
-// allowlisted in tests/single-writer-invariant.test.ts alongside db/writers/.
+// allowlisted in tests/single-writer-invariant.test.ts alongside the explicit
+// writer layer.
 import { createRequire } from "node:module";
 import { existsSync, copyFileSync, mkdirSync, realpathSync } from "node:fs";
 import { dirname, join } from "node:path";

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/db/queries.ts

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 // Read-only callers (forensics, dashboard, doctor) depend on this seam, not on
 // the single-writer surface.
 import { getDbOrNull } from "./engine.js";
+import { isClosedStatus } from "../status-guards.js";
 import { getGateIdsForTurn, type OwnerTurn } from "../gate-registry.js";
 import type { Decision, Requirement, GateRow, GateScope } from "../types.js";
 import {
@@ -269,6 +270,71 @@ export function getMilestoneSlices(milestoneId: string): SliceRow[] {
   return rows.map(rowToSlice);
 }
 
+/**
+ * Load slices for many milestones in a single query. Returns a Map keyed by
+ * milestone_id, preserving `ORDER BY sequence, id` within each bucket.
+ */
+export function getSlicesByMilestoneIds(milestoneIds: readonly string[]): Map<string, SliceRow[]> {
+  const db = getDbOrNull();
+  if (!db || milestoneIds.length === 0) return new Map();
+  const idList = [...milestoneIds];
+  const placeholders = idList.map((_, i) => `:mid${i}`).join(",");
+  const params: Record<string, unknown> = {};
+  idList.forEach((id, i) => {
+    params[`:mid${i}`] = id;
+  });
+  const rows = db
+    .prepare(`SELECT * FROM slices WHERE milestone_id IN (${placeholders}) ORDER BY milestone_id, sequence, id`)
+    .all(params) as Record<string, unknown>[];
+  const byMilestone = new Map<string, SliceRow[]>();
+  for (const row of rows) {
+    const slice = rowToSlice(row);
+    const bucket = byMilestone.get(slice.milestone_id);
+    if (bucket) {
+      bucket.push(slice);
+    } else {
+      byMilestone.set(slice.milestone_id, [slice]);
+    }
+  }
+  return byMilestone;
+}
+
+/** Dispatch-eligibility shape consumed by decision-path callers (ADR-017). */
+export interface MilestoneSliceSummary {
+  id: string;
+  title: string;
+  /** Closed per the canonical status vocabulary (complete/done/skipped/closed). */
+  done: boolean;
+  depends: string[];
+}
+
+/**
+ * Consolidated DB read for dispatch/gate/completion decisions (ADR-017).
+ * `done` uses the canonical closed-status predicate (`isClosedStatus`) — the
+ * same vocabulary the SQL terminal-status fragment derives from. Decision
+ * paths must consume this instead of parsing `.gsd/*.md` projections.
+ * Rows keep `getMilestoneSlices` ordering (sequence, then id).
+ */
+export function getMilestoneSliceSummaries(milestoneId: string): MilestoneSliceSummary[] {
+  return getMilestoneSlices(milestoneId).map((s) => ({
+    id: s.id,
+    title: s.title,
+    done: isClosedStatus(s.status),
+    depends: s.depends ?? [],
+  }));
+}
+
+/**
+ * Ids of slices closed per the canonical status vocabulary (ADR-017), in
+ * milestone order. Thin wrapper over `getMilestoneSliceSummaries` for the
+ * common "which slices are done?" decision-path read.
+ */
+export function getClosedSliceIds(milestoneId: string): string[] {
+  return getMilestoneSliceSummaries(milestoneId)
+    .filter((s) => s.done)
+    .map((s) => s.id);
+}
+
 export function getArtifact(path: string): ArtifactRow | null {
   if (!getDbOrNull()!) return null;
   const row = getDbOrNull()!.prepare("SELECT * FROM artifacts WHERE path = :path").get({ ":path": path });