@oneuptime/common 13.0.4 → 13.0.6

package/Tests/Server/Utils/Dashboard/SloTemplatePublicDashboard.test.ts

@@ -1,100 +1,90 @@
 import PublicDashboardResourceListPolicy, {
   PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult,
 } from "../../../../Server/Utils/Dashboard/PublicDashboardResourceListPolicy";
-import PublicDashboardSloWidget, {
-  PublicDashboardSloWidgetConfig,
+import PublicDashboardSloHistoryPolicy, {
+  PublicDashboardSloHistoryPolicyResult,
+} from "../../../../Server/Utils/Dashboard/PublicDashboardSloHistoryPolicy";
+import {
+  PUBLIC_SLO_WIDGET_NO_SELECTION_MESSAGE,
+  PublicDashboardSloWidgetTargetKind,
 } from "../../../../Server/Utils/Dashboard/PublicDashboardSloWidget";
 import PublicDashboardViewConfig from "../../../../Server/Utils/Dashboard/PublicDashboardViewConfig";
-import Alert from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Alert";
 import DatabaseBaseModel from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/DatabaseBaseModel/DatabaseBaseModel";
-import Incident from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Incident";
-import Monitor from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/Monitor";
 import ServiceLevelObjective from "../../../../Models/DatabaseModels/ServiceLevelObjective";
+import Includes from "../../../../Types/BaseDatabase/Includes";
 import SortOrder from "../../../../Types/BaseDatabase/SortOrder";
 import { LIMIT_PER_PROJECT } from "../../../../Types/Database/LimitMax";
 import DashboardBaseComponent from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardComponents/DashboardBaseComponent";
-import {
-  SloWidgetDisplayType,
-  SloWidgetMetric,
-} from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardComponents/DashboardSloComponent";
+import { SloWidgetDisplayType } from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardComponents/DashboardSloComponent";
 import DashboardComponentType from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardComponentType";
 import {
   DashboardTemplateType,
   getTemplateConfig,
 } from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardTemplates";
-import DashboardVariable, {
-  DashboardVariableType,
-} from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardVariable";
+import DashboardVariable from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardVariable";
 import DashboardViewConfig from "../../../../Types/Dashboard/DashboardViewConfig";
 import BadDataException from "../../../../Types/Exception/BadDataException";
 import { JSONObject } from "../../../../Types/JSON";
 import ObjectID from "../../../../Types/ObjectID";
+import SloStatus from "../../../../Types/ServiceLevelObjective/SloStatus";
+import { SLO_LIST_DEFAULT_MAX_ROWS } from "../../../../Utils/Slo/SloListWidgetFormat";
 import { describe, expect, it } from "@jest/globals";
 
 /*
- * The SLO template's own stored config, driven through the server policy that
- * stands between an ANONYMOUS public-dashboard viewer and the project's data.
+ * The SLO template's own stored config, driven through the server policies
+ * that stand between an ANONYMOUS public-dashboard viewer and the project's
+ * data.
  *
- * The editorial suite (Tests/Types/Dashboard/SloDashboardTemplate.test.ts)
- * pins what the template SAYS. This one pins what it can be made to DO once a
- * dashboard created from it is published: which rows the unauthenticated
- * routes will read, which columns of those rows travel to the viewer, and
- * which widgets fail closed instead of resolving to something broader than
- * their author picked.
+ * The editorial suite pins what the template SAYS. This one pins what it can
+ * be made to DO once a dashboard created from it is published: which rows the
+ * unauthenticated routes read, which columns travel to the viewer, what the
+ * viewer's toolbar selection is allowed to change, and which widgets fail
+ * closed.
  *
- * Written against the template rather than against hand-built widgets on
- * purpose: a widget the template ships is a widget that exists on real public
- * dashboards, so the two files have to agree about the same JSON, and a
- * change to either one that breaks that agreement fails here.
+ * Written against the template rather than hand-built widgets: a widget the
+ * template ships is a widget that exists on real public dashboards.
  */
 
 // -- Fixtures --------------------------------------------------------------
 
 /*
- * The owning dashboard's project. DashboardAPI.servePublicResourceList stamps
- * this over the policy query as the LAST word before the root read, so it is
- * modelled here rather than assumed.
+ * DashboardAPI stamps the owning dashboard's project over every policy query
+ * as the LAST word before the root read, so it is modelled rather than assumed.
  */
 const DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
 
-// The objective an editor picks on a widget after creating the dashboard.
-const PICKED_SLO_ID: ObjectID = ObjectID.generate();
+const PICKED_SLO: string = "Checkout API";
 
 /*
- * Everything a caller of the public endpoint controls, all of it naming
- * something this dashboard never published: another SLO, another project,
- * another row set, an unbounded page. None of it may reach the query.
+ * Everything a caller of the public endpoint controls that names something the
+ * dashboard never published. None of it may reach the query.
  */
 const HOSTILE_QUERY: JSONObject = {
   _id: ObjectID.generate().toString(),
   projectId: ObjectID.generate().toString(),
   name: "probe",
-  isEnabled: true,
-  isPrivate: false,
+  isArchived: true,
+  description: "leak",
   limit: 100000,
   skip: 500,
 };
 
-/*
- * The two refusal messages the policy can answer a template widget with. Both
- * are pinned as literals: they are what an operator reads when a public page
- * shows an error, and they say two DIFFERENT things — "nobody picked an
- * objective yet" versus "this kind of widget has no public list at all".
- */
-const NO_OBJECTIVE_MESSAGE: string =
-  "This dashboard widget has no Service Level Objective selected.";
+const UNSUPPORTED_MESSAGE_PREFIX: string =
+  "Unsupported public dashboard resource widget: ";
 
 /*
- * The public list resource each template widget kind resolves to. Any widget
- * kind NOT in this map must be refused; that is the whole point of the
- * fall-through walk at the bottom of the file.
+ * The seven display fields (plus the row id) both SLO widgets render. Pinned
+ * as a literal: this IS what an anonymous viewer can read.
  */
-const PUBLIC_LIST_RESOURCE_BY_COMPONENT_TYPE: Partial<
-  Record<DashboardComponentType, string>
-> = {
-  [DashboardComponentType.IncidentList]: "incident",
-  [DashboardComponentType.AlertList]: "alert",
-  [DashboardComponentType.MonitorList]: "monitor",
+const PUBLISHED_SLO_SELECT: JSONObject = {
+  _id: true,
+  name: true,
+  targetPercentage: true,
+  currentSliPercentage: true,
+  errorBudgetRemainingPercentage: true,
+  errorBudgetRemainingSeconds: true,
+  currentBurnRate: true,
+  sloStatus: true,
 };
 
 type WidgetArguments = Record<string, unknown>;
@@ -104,8 +94,6 @@ type WidgetArguments = Record<string, unknown>;
 /*
  * The config exactly as the public route reads it back: sanitized for
  * anonymous viewers, then through JSON, because it lives in a JSONB column.
- * Anything the template puts in a widget argument that does not survive that
- * round trip is not what the policy parses.
  */
 function storedConfig(): DashboardViewConfig {
   const sanitized: DashboardViewConfig | null =
@@ -129,31 +117,10 @@ function componentsOfType(
   );
 }
 
-// Fails loudly (rather than returning undefined) when the widget is gone.
-function onlyComponentOfType(
-  config: DashboardViewConfig,
-  componentType: DashboardComponentType,
-): DashboardBaseComponent {
-  const matches: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
-    config,
-    componentType,
-  );
-
-  expect(matches).toHaveLength(1);
-
-  return matches[0] as DashboardBaseComponent;
-}
-
 function argumentsOf(component: DashboardBaseComponent): WidgetArguments {
   return (component.arguments as WidgetArguments | undefined) || {};
 }
 
-/*
- * Widget titles are the only stable handle on a template widget — component
- * ids are regenerated on every getTemplateConfig() call and row positions
- * move whenever a band is inserted. Each family stores its title under its
- * own key; the Slo widget uses `widgetTitle`, which no other family does.
- */
 function titleOf(component: DashboardBaseComponent): string {
   const args: WidgetArguments = argumentsOf(component);
 
@@ -168,24 +135,29 @@ function titleOf(component: DashboardBaseComponent): string {
   return "(untitled)";
 }
 
-// Every assertion below is labelled with this, so a failure names the widget.
 function labelOf(component: DashboardBaseComponent): string {
   return `${component.componentType} "${titleOf(component)}"`;
 }
 
-/*
- * A copy of a stored widget with its arguments overridden — used to model the
- * editor picking an objective on a template widget, which is the only thing
- * that turns one of them into a widget that resolves.
- */
-function withArguments(
-  component: DashboardBaseComponent,
-  overrides: WidgetArguments,
-): DashboardBaseComponent {
-  return {
-    ...component,
-    arguments: { ...argumentsOf(component), ...overrides },
-  } as DashboardBaseComponent;
+function sloVariableOf(config: DashboardViewConfig): DashboardVariable {
+  const variables: Array<DashboardVariable> = config.variables || [];
+
+  expect(variables).toHaveLength(1);
+  return variables[0] as DashboardVariable;
+}
+
+// What the browser sends for a single-select toolbar pick.
+function selectionOf(
+  config: DashboardViewConfig,
+  selectedValue: string,
+): Array<JSONObject> {
+  return [
+    {
+      id: sloVariableOf(config).id,
+      selectedValue: selectedValue,
+      selectedValues: [],
+    },
+  ];
 }
 
 function buildPolicy(data: {
@@ -202,31 +174,20 @@ function buildPolicy(data: {
   });
 }
 
-/*
- * The query the route actually executes: the policy query, with the owning
- * dashboard's project stamped over it. Asserting on THIS rather than on
- * policy.query alone is what proves a requested projectId cannot survive.
- */
-function routeQuery(policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult): {
-  [key: string]: unknown;
-} {
+// The query the route actually executes: the policy's, with the project stamped last.
+function routeQuery(
+  policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult,
+): Record<string, unknown> {
   return { ...policy.query, projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID };
 }
 
-/*
- * What the policy did with one stored widget, as a single comparable string:
- * either the resource it will list, or the refusal it answered with. A widget
- * that resolves where it should be refused reads as a plain diff rather than
- * as a missing throw.
- */
 function outcomeOf(data: {
   config: DashboardViewConfig;
   component: DashboardBaseComponent;
+  requestedVariables?: Array<JSONObject> | undefined;
 }): string {
   try {
-    const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy(data);
-
-    return `lists ${policy.resourceType}`;
+    return `lists ${buildPolicy(data).resourceType}`;
   } catch (error) {
     if (error instanceof BadDataException) {
       return `refused: ${error.message}`;
@@ -236,146 +197,93 @@ function outcomeOf(data: {
   }
 }
 
-function expectedOutcomeOf(component: DashboardBaseComponent): string {
-  const resourceType: string | undefined =
-    PUBLIC_LIST_RESOURCE_BY_COMPONENT_TYPE[component.componentType];
-
-  if (resourceType) {
-    return `lists ${resourceType}`;
-  }
-
-  /*
-   * Every Slo widget the template ships is unconfigured, so it refuses for
-   * the one reason that is not a bug.
-   */
-  if (component.componentType === DashboardComponentType.Slo) {
-    return `refused: ${NO_OBJECTIVE_MESSAGE}`;
-  }
-
-  /*
-   * Text, Value and Chart widgets read the metric store, not a Postgres list,
-   * so the public list endpoint has nothing to serve them — and says which
-   * widget kind it is turning away.
-   */
-  return `refused: Unsupported public dashboard resource widget: ${component.componentType}`;
-}
-
-/*
- * The columns the model declares that a widget's public select does NOT
- * publish. Derived from the model itself so it cannot go stale as the model
- * grows.
- */
-function withheldColumnsOf(data: {
-  model: DatabaseBaseModel;
-  select: JSONObject;
-}): Array<string> {
-  const published: Array<string> = Object.keys(data.select);
-
-  return data.model
-    .getTableColumns()
-    .columns.filter((column: string): boolean => {
-      return !published.includes(column);
+function buildHistoryPolicy(data: {
+  config: DashboardViewConfig;
+  component: DashboardBaseComponent;
+  requestedVariables?: Array<JSONObject> | undefined;
+}): PublicDashboardSloHistoryPolicyResult {
+  // The route resolves the viewer's selections exactly like this before building.
+  const variables: Array<DashboardVariable> =
+    PublicDashboardResourceListPolicy.resolveDashboardVariableSelections({
+      dashboardViewConfig: data.config,
+      requestedVariables: data.requestedVariables || [],
     });
+
+  return PublicDashboardSloHistoryPolicy.build({
+    widget: data.component,
+    requestedAggregateBy: {
+      startTimestamp: new Date("2026-08-09T00:00:00.000Z"),
+      endTimestamp: new Date("2026-08-09T06:00:00.000Z"),
+    },
+    variables,
+  });
 }
 
 /*
- * Two directions, both needed:
- *
- * - every field the select DOES publish is a real column of the model, so a
- *   pinned select cannot quietly drift onto a field that no longer exists;
- * - every column named as sensitive is a real column of the model AND is
- *   withheld. Checking that the name is real is what stops this list from
- *   rotting into a set of no-op assertions after a column rename.
+ * Columns the model declares that a select does NOT publish, derived from the
+ * model so each sensitive name is checked to be a real column before it is
+ * checked to be withheld — a rename cannot make an assertion vacuous.
  */
 function expectSelectPublishesNothingSensitive(data: {
-  modelName: string;
   model: DatabaseBaseModel;
   select: JSONObject;
   sensitiveColumns: Array<string>;
 }): void {
   const declared: Array<string> = data.model.getTableColumns().columns;
-  const withheld: Array<string> = withheldColumnsOf({
-    model: data.model,
-    select: data.select,
-  });
-
-  expect(declared.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  expect(withheld.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-  expect(data.sensitiveColumns.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+  const published: Array<string> = Object.keys(data.select);
 
-  for (const column of Object.keys(data.select)) {
+  for (const column of published) {
     expect(
-      `${data.modelName}.${column} is ${
-        declared.includes(column) ? "a column" : "NOT A COLUMN"
-      }`,
-    ).toBe(`${data.modelName}.${column} is a column`);
+      `${column} is ${declared.includes(column) ? "a column" : "NOT A COLUMN"}`,
+    ).toBe(`${column} is a column`);
   }
 
   for (const column of data.sensitiveColumns) {
     expect(
-      `${data.modelName}.${column} is ${
-        declared.includes(column) ? "a column" : "NOT A COLUMN"
-      }`,
-    ).toBe(`${data.modelName}.${column} is a column`);
-
+      `${column} is ${declared.includes(column) ? "a column" : "NOT A COLUMN"}`,
+    ).toBe(`${column} is a column`);
     expect(
-      `${data.modelName}.${column} is ${
-        withheld.includes(column) ? "withheld" : "PUBLISHED"
-      }`,
-    ).toBe(`${data.modelName}.${column} is withheld`);
+      `${column} is ${published.includes(column) ? "PUBLISHED" : "withheld"}`,
+    ).toBe(`${column} is withheld`);
   }
 }
 
-function monitorVariableOf(config: DashboardViewConfig): DashboardVariable {
-  const telemetryVariables: Array<DashboardVariable> = (
-    config.variables || []
-  ).filter((variable: DashboardVariable): boolean => {
-    return variable.type === DashboardVariableType.TelemetryAttribute;
-  });
-
-  expect(telemetryVariables).toHaveLength(1);
-
-  return telemetryVariables[0] as DashboardVariable;
-}
-
-/*
- * A selection for the template's own Monitor variable, plus one for a
- * variable this dashboard does not have. Neither may become a filter on the
- * Postgres-backed lists, which read no telemetry attribute at all.
- */
-function hostileVariableSelections(
-  config: DashboardViewConfig,
-): Array<JSONObject> {
-  return [
-    {
-      id: monitorVariableOf(config).id,
-      selectedValues: ["' OR 1=1 --", "%"],
-    },
-    {
-      id: ObjectID.generate().toString(),
-      selectedValues: ["a variable this dashboard never stored"],
-    },
-  ];
-}
+const SENSITIVE_SLO_COLUMNS: Array<string> = [
+  "description",
+  "slug",
+  "labels",
+  "monitors",
+  "monitorLabels",
+  "autoAddedMonitors",
+  "downtimeMonitorStatuses",
+  "multiMonitorMode",
+  "metricQueryConfig",
+  "sliType",
+  "windowType",
+  "windowDays",
+  "timezone",
+  "atRiskThresholdPercentage",
+  "errorBudgetTotalSeconds",
+  "isEnabled",
+  "isArchived",
+  "archivedAt",
+  "archivedByUserId",
+  "lastEvaluatedAt",
+  "nextEvaluationAt",
+  "lastAccumulatedBucketEndAt",
+  "statusChangeNotificationSentAt",
+  "createdByUserId",
+  "projectId",
+];
 
 // -- Tests -----------------------------------------------------------------
 
 describe("SLO dashboard template on a public dashboard", () => {
   describe("the config an anonymous viewer is served", () => {
-    /*
-     * The sanitizer drops Data Source widgets outright, because their stored
-     * config IS a query against an internal system. This template ships none,
-     * so publishing it must cost it no widgets — if a later revision reaches
-     * for a Data Source widget, the public page would silently lose it.
-     */
-    it("keeps every widget the template ships", () => {
+    it("keeps every widget and the SLO variable the template ships", () => {
       const template: DashboardViewConfig = getTemplateConfig(
         DashboardTemplateType.Slo,
       ) as DashboardViewConfig;
-
-      expect(template).not.toBeNull();
-      expect(template.components.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
       const published: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
 
       expect(
@@ -389,91 +297,72 @@ describe("SLO dashboard template on a public dashboard", () => {
           return component.componentType;
         }),
       );
+      expect(published.variables).toHaveLength(1);
     });
   });
 
-  describe("SLO widgets while no objective is picked", () => {
+  describe("every component on the template", () => {
     /*
-     * The security property this template rests on. Every Slo widget ships
-     * without a serviceLevelObjectiveId because a template cannot know a
-     * project's SLO ids — and on a public dashboard the stored id IS the
-     * authorization decision. An unconfigured widget therefore has to fail
-     * closed: the one thing it must never do is resolve to "whichever SLO the
-     * query finds", which on a project-scoped read means any of them.
+     * The fall-through guard. As published and before any pick, the SLO List
+     * serves its resource, the SLO widgets refuse for the one reason that is
+     * not a bug (nobody has picked an SLO), and the metric and text widgets are
+     * turned away from the list endpoint entirely. There is no fourth outcome.
      */
-    it("refuses every SLO widget the template ships", () => {
+    it("either lists a known resource or is refused, with nothing in between", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const sloWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
-        config,
-        DashboardComponentType.Slo,
-      );
 
-      expect(sloWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      const outcomes: Array<string> = sloWidgets.map(
-        (component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
+      expect(
+        config.components.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
           return `${labelOf(component)} -> ${outcomeOf({ config, component })}`;
-        },
-      );
+        }),
+      ).toEqual(
+        config.components.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
+          if (component.componentType === DashboardComponentType.SloList) {
+            return `${labelOf(component)} -> lists slo-list`;
+          }
 
-      expect(outcomes).toEqual(
-        sloWidgets.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> refused: ${NO_OBJECTIVE_MESSAGE}`;
+          if (component.componentType === DashboardComponentType.Slo) {
+            return `${labelOf(component)} -> refused: ${PUBLIC_SLO_WIDGET_NO_SELECTION_MESSAGE}`;
+          }
+
+          return `${labelOf(component)} -> refused: ${UNSUPPORTED_MESSAGE_PREFIX}${component.componentType}`;
         }),
       );
     });
 
-    /*
-     * The same stored widget also drives the SloHistory aggregation route,
-     * which is a second unauthenticated surface reading a different store.
-     * Both parse the id through PublicDashboardSloWidget, so both have to
-     * refuse the unconfigured widget — a template whose widgets failed closed
-     * on one route and open on the other would be worse than either.
-     */
-    it("refuses the same widgets on the SLO history route too", () => {
+    it("lists the SLO widgets' objective once a pick is sent, and nothing else changes", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const sloWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
+      const requestedVariables: Array<JSONObject> = selectionOf(
         config,
-        DashboardComponentType.Slo,
+        PICKED_SLO,
       );
 
-      expect(sloWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      const outcomes: Array<string> = sloWidgets.map(
-        (component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          try {
-            const parsed: PublicDashboardSloWidgetConfig =
-              PublicDashboardSloWidget.readConfig(component);
-
-            return `${labelOf(component)} -> read ${parsed.serviceLevelObjectiveId.toString()}`;
-          } catch (error) {
-            if (error instanceof BadDataException) {
-              return `${labelOf(component)} -> refused: ${error.message}`;
-            }
-
-            return `${labelOf(component)} -> threw a non-BadDataException: ${String(
-              error,
-            )}`;
-          }
-        },
-      );
+      for (const component of config.components) {
+        const expected: string =
+          component.componentType === DashboardComponentType.SloList
+            ? "lists slo-list"
+            : component.componentType === DashboardComponentType.Slo
+              ? "lists slo"
+              : `refused: ${UNSUPPORTED_MESSAGE_PREFIX}${component.componentType}`;
 
-      expect(outcomes).toEqual(
-        sloWidgets.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> refused: ${NO_OBJECTIVE_MESSAGE}`;
-        }),
-      );
+        expect(
+          `${labelOf(component)} -> ${outcomeOf({
+            config,
+            component,
+            requestedVariables,
+          })}`,
+        ).toBe(`${labelOf(component)} -> ${expected}`);
+      }
     });
   });
 
-  describe("an SLO widget once an objective is picked", () => {
+  describe("the SLO widgets", () => {
     /*
-     * The id comes from stored config and from nowhere else. A caller that
-     * names a different SLO, a different project, or no filter at all gets
-     * the one row the widget's author published — which is why this endpoint
-     * cannot be walked across the project's other objectives.
+     * Unpicked, every SLO widget fails closed on BOTH unauthenticated routes.
+     * What it must never do is resolve to "whichever SLO the query finds",
+     * which on a project-scoped read means any of them.
      */
-    it("resolves to exactly the SLO stored on the widget, whatever the request asks for", () => {
+    it("refuse on the resource and history routes until an SLO is picked", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
       const sloWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
         config,
@@ -482,561 +371,326 @@ describe("SLO dashboard template on a public dashboard", () => {
 
       expect(sloWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
 
-      const resolved: Array<string> = sloWidgets.map(
-        (component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
-            config,
-            component: withArguments(component, {
-              serviceLevelObjectiveId: PICKED_SLO_ID.toString(),
-            }),
-            requestedQuery: HOSTILE_QUERY,
-            requestedVariables: hostileVariableSelections(config),
-          });
-
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> ${policy.resourceType} ${JSON.stringify(
-            routeQuery(policy),
-          )}`;
-        },
-      );
-
-      expect(resolved).toEqual(
-        sloWidgets.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> slo ${JSON.stringify({
-            _id: PICKED_SLO_ID,
-            projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID,
-          })}`;
-        }),
-      );
+      for (const component of sloWidgets) {
+        expect(() => {
+          return buildPolicy({ config, component });
+        }).toThrow(PUBLIC_SLO_WIDGET_NO_SELECTION_MESSAGE);
+
+        if (
+          argumentsOf(component)["displayType"] === SloWidgetDisplayType.Chart
+        ) {
+          expect(() => {
+            return buildHistoryPolicy({ config, component });
+          }).toThrow(PUBLIC_SLO_WIDGET_NO_SELECTION_MESSAGE);
+        }
+      }
     });
 
     /*
-     * One row, no filter, and no caller-supplied page size. A widget that
-     * renders a single objective has no use for a second row, and a read that
-     * accepts no filter cannot be turned into an oracle that answers
-     * questions about the SLOs it was not pointed at.
+     * With a pick, the read is an exact-match NAME within the dashboard's
+     * project, among ACTIVE objectives only, two rows at most (one to show,
+     * one to detect a shared name) — and nothing in the request's own query
+     * survives.
      */
-    it("reads one row and accepts no filter of its own", () => {
+    it("read the picked SLO by exact name, active only, at most two rows, whatever the query says", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const sloWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
+
+      for (const component of componentsOfType(
         config,
         DashboardComponentType.Slo,
-      );
-
-      expect(sloWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      for (const component of sloWidgets) {
+      )) {
         const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
           config,
-          component: withArguments(component, {
-            serviceLevelObjectiveId: PICKED_SLO_ID.toString(),
-          }),
+          component,
           requestedQuery: HOSTILE_QUERY,
-          requestedVariables: hostileVariableSelections(config),
+          requestedVariables: selectionOf(config, PICKED_SLO),
         });
 
-        expect(`${labelOf(component)} reads ${policy.limit} row(s)`).toBe(
-          `${labelOf(component)} reads 1 row(s)`,
+        expect(`${labelOf(component)} -> ${policy.resourceType}`).toBe(
+          `${labelOf(component)} -> slo`,
         );
-        expect(
-          `${labelOf(component)} filters on ${Object.keys(policy.query)
-            .sort()
-            .join(", ")}`,
-        ).toBe(`${labelOf(component)} filters on _id`);
+        expect(routeQuery(policy)).toEqual({
+          name: PICKED_SLO,
+          isArchived: false,
+          projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID,
+        });
+        expect(policy.limit).toBe(2);
         expect(policy.sort).toEqual({ name: SortOrder.Ascending });
+        expect(policy.select).toEqual(PUBLISHED_SLO_SELECT);
       }
     });
 
     /*
-     * The id is not the only thing the server parses out of these widgets:
-     * the series and the shape are stored under `sloMetric` and
-     * `displayType`, and the policy reads those same keys. Renaming either
-     * key in the template would leave the server silently defaulting to the
-     * SLI tile on six widgets that draw three different numbers.
+     * A viewer's value is used as a literal equality, never compiled into a
+     * search or an IN-list: a string that looks like SQL is just a name no SLO
+     * has.
      */
-    it("parses back the series and display the template stored on each widget", () => {
+    it("treat a hostile pick as a literal name, never as a pattern", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const sloWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
+      const component: DashboardBaseComponent = componentsOfType(
         config,
         DashboardComponentType.Slo,
-      );
-
-      expect(sloWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      const parsed: Array<string> = sloWidgets.map(
-        (component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          const config2: PublicDashboardSloWidgetConfig =
-            PublicDashboardSloWidget.readConfig(
-              withArguments(component, {
-                serviceLevelObjectiveId: PICKED_SLO_ID.toString(),
-              }),
-            );
-
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> ${config2.sloMetric}/${config2.displayType}`;
-        },
-      );
-
-      expect(parsed).toEqual(
-        sloWidgets.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          const args: WidgetArguments = argumentsOf(component);
-
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> ${String(args["sloMetric"])}/${String(
-            args["displayType"],
-          )}`;
-        }),
-      );
-
-      // ...and what came back is a real member of each enum, not a free string.
-      for (const entry of parsed) {
-        const [metric, display] = (entry.split(" -> ")[1] as string).split("/");
-
-        expect(Object.values(SloWidgetMetric) as Array<string>).toContain(
-          metric as string,
-        );
-        expect(Object.values(SloWidgetDisplayType) as Array<string>).toContain(
-          display as string,
-        );
-      }
-    });
-  });
+      )[0] as DashboardBaseComponent;
+      const hostile: string = "' OR 1=1 --%";
 
-  describe("what an SLO row may show in public", () => {
-    function sloSelect(): JSONObject {
-      const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const sloWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
+      const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
         config,
-        DashboardComponentType.Slo,
-      );
-
-      expect(sloWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      return buildPolicy({
-        config,
-        component: withArguments(sloWidgets[0] as DashboardBaseComponent, {
-          serviceLevelObjectiveId: PICKED_SLO_ID.toString(),
-        }),
-        requestedQuery: HOSTILE_QUERY,
-      }).select;
-    }
-
-    it("publishes the row id and the seven display numbers, and nothing else", () => {
-      expect(sloSelect()).toEqual({
-        _id: true,
-        name: true,
-        targetPercentage: true,
-        currentSliPercentage: true,
-        errorBudgetRemainingPercentage: true,
-        errorBudgetRemainingSeconds: true,
-        currentBurnRate: true,
-        sloStatus: true,
+        component,
+        requestedVariables: selectionOf(config, hostile),
       });
+
+      expect(policy.query["name"]).toBe(hostile);
+      expect(policy.query["name"]).not.toBeInstanceOf(Includes);
     });
 
     /*
-     * An SLO's headline numbers are publishable; its DEFINITION is not. Which
-     * monitors it watches, how it is evaluated and on what schedule, the
-     * metric query behind it, and who created it are all things a reader of a
-     * public status page has no business reading out of it.
-     *
-     * Driven from ServiceLevelObjective's own column list so that each name
-     * below is checked to be a real column before it is checked to be
-     * withheld — a rename that made one of these assertions vacuous fails
-     * here instead of passing quietly.
+     * Only the STORED variable's selection counts. A selection for a variable
+     * id this dashboard never stored, or a multi-value array sent against the
+     * stored single-select, is dropped — leaving the widget unpicked.
      */
-    it("keeps every other ServiceLevelObjective column behind the session", () => {
-      expectSelectPublishesNothingSensitive({
-        modelName: "ServiceLevelObjective",
-        model: new ServiceLevelObjective(),
-        select: sloSelect(),
-        sensitiveColumns: [
-          "description",
-          "slug",
-          "labels",
-          "monitors",
-          "monitorLabels",
-          "autoAddedMonitors",
-          "downtimeMonitorStatuses",
-          "multiMonitorMode",
-          "metricQueryConfig",
-          "sliType",
-          "windowType",
-          "windowDays",
-          "timezone",
-          "lastEvaluatedAt",
-          "nextEvaluationAt",
-          "lastAccumulatedBucketEndAt",
-          "statusChangeNotificationSentAt",
-          "createdByUser",
-          "createdByUserId",
-          "projectId",
+    it("ignore selections the stored variable could not have produced", () => {
+      const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
+      const component: DashboardBaseComponent = componentsOfType(
+        config,
+        DashboardComponentType.Slo,
+      )[0] as DashboardBaseComponent;
+
+      for (const requestedVariables of [
+        [{ id: ObjectID.generate().toString(), selectedValue: PICKED_SLO }],
+        [
+          {
+            id: sloVariableOf(config).id,
+            selectedValues: [PICKED_SLO, "Search API"],
+          },
         ],
-      });
+      ] as Array<Array<JSONObject>>) {
+        expect(() => {
+          return buildPolicy({ config, component, requestedVariables });
+        }).toThrow(PUBLIC_SLO_WIDGET_NO_SELECTION_MESSAGE);
+      }
     });
-  });
 
-  describe("the incident, alert and monitor lists the template ships", () => {
-    /*
-     * These three read Postgres and carry no stored filter at all — the
-     * template deliberately pre-filters none of them to a lifecycle state, a
-     * severity, or a monitor type. So the ONLY thing narrowing the read is
-     * the project the dashboard belongs to, and that has to hold even when
-     * the caller supplies a query naming another project.
-     */
-    it("scopes each list to the dashboard's project and to nothing else", () => {
+    it("refuse an oversized pick before it can become a query parameter", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const listWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = [
-        onlyComponentOfType(config, DashboardComponentType.IncidentList),
-        onlyComponentOfType(config, DashboardComponentType.AlertList),
-        onlyComponentOfType(config, DashboardComponentType.MonitorList),
-      ];
-
-      expect(listWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+      const component: DashboardBaseComponent = componentsOfType(
+        config,
+        DashboardComponentType.Slo,
+      )[0] as DashboardBaseComponent;
 
-      for (const component of listWidgets) {
-        const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
+      expect(() => {
+        return buildPolicy({
           config,
           component,
-          requestedQuery: HOSTILE_QUERY,
-          requestedVariables: hostileVariableSelections(config),
+          requestedVariables: selectionOf(config, "x".repeat(2000)),
         });
+      }).toThrow(BadDataException);
+    });
 
-        /*
-         * The policy names no project of its own: the route's stamp is the
-         * only source of project scope, and it must be the last word.
-         */
-        expect(
-          `${labelOf(component)} filters on [${Object.keys(policy.query)
-            .sort()
-            .join(", ")}]`,
-        ).toBe(`${labelOf(component)} filters on []`);
+    it("chart history for the picked SLO by name, and only for Chart widgets", () => {
+      const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
+      const requestedVariables: Array<JSONObject> = selectionOf(
+        config,
+        PICKED_SLO,
+      );
 
-        expect(routeQuery(policy)).toEqual({
-          projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID,
+      for (const component of componentsOfType(
+        config,
+        DashboardComponentType.Slo,
+      )) {
+        const isChart: boolean =
+          argumentsOf(component)["displayType"] === SloWidgetDisplayType.Chart;
+
+        if (!isChart) {
+          // A tile publishes current numbers, never 400 days of history.
+          expect(() => {
+            return buildHistoryPolicy({
+              config,
+              component,
+              requestedVariables,
+            });
+          }).toThrow(BadDataException);
+          continue;
+        }
+
+        const policy: PublicDashboardSloHistoryPolicyResult =
+          buildHistoryPolicy({ config, component, requestedVariables });
+
+        expect(policy.target).toEqual({
+          kind: PublicDashboardSloWidgetTargetKind.Selected,
+          serviceLevelObjectiveName: PICKED_SLO,
         });
+        expect(policy.limit).toBe(LIMIT_PER_PROJECT);
       }
     });
 
-    /*
-     * The dashboard's Monitor variable is a TelemetryAttribute bound to the
-     * bare `monitorName` key, which these three widgets cannot read: they
-     * query Postgres, and MonitorList's only variable binding is a
-     * ProjectLabel one this template does not ship. A selection therefore has
-     * to leave the query untouched rather than become an IN-list on it.
-     */
-    it("lets no variable selection become a filter on those lists", () => {
+    it("keep every other ServiceLevelObjective column behind the session", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const variable: DashboardVariable = monitorVariableOf(config);
 
-      expect(variable.attributeKey).toBe("monitorName");
-
-      for (const componentType of [
-        DashboardComponentType.IncidentList,
-        DashboardComponentType.AlertList,
-        DashboardComponentType.MonitorList,
-      ]) {
-        const component: DashboardBaseComponent = onlyComponentOfType(
+      expectSelectPublishesNothingSensitive({
+        model: new ServiceLevelObjective(),
+        select: buildPolicy({
           config,
-          componentType,
-        );
-        const withSelection: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult =
-          buildPolicy({
+          component: componentsOfType(
             config,
-            component,
-            requestedVariables: [
-              {
-                id: variable.id,
-                selectedValues: ["api-monitor", "' OR 1=1 --"],
-              },
-            ],
-          });
-        const withoutSelection: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult =
-          buildPolicy({ config, component });
-
-        expect(
-          `${labelOf(component)} with a monitor picked: ${JSON.stringify(
-            withSelection.query,
-          )}`,
-        ).toBe(
-          `${labelOf(component)} with a monitor picked: ${JSON.stringify(
-            withoutSelection.query,
-          )}`,
-        );
-      }
+            DashboardComponentType.Slo,
+          )[0] as DashboardBaseComponent,
+          requestedVariables: selectionOf(config, PICKED_SLO),
+        }).select,
+        sensitiveColumns: SENSITIVE_SLO_COLUMNS,
+      });
     });
+  });
 
-    /*
-     * Resource type, order and page size, per widget. The resource type is
-     * checked against the URL the caller requested before any read happens,
-     * so a widget resolving to the wrong one would let a dashboard serve a
-     * resource it does not render; the limit comes from the widget's OWN
-     * stored maxRows, never from the request.
-     */
-    it("maps each list to its own resource, order and stored row cap", () => {
-      const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-
-      const expectations: Array<{
-        componentType: DashboardComponentType;
-        resourceType: string;
-        sort: JSONObject;
-      }> = [
-        {
-          componentType: DashboardComponentType.IncidentList,
-          resourceType: "incident",
-          sort: { createdAt: SortOrder.Descending },
-        },
-        {
-          componentType: DashboardComponentType.AlertList,
-          resourceType: "alert",
-          sort: { createdAt: SortOrder.Descending },
-        },
-        {
-          componentType: DashboardComponentType.MonitorList,
-          resourceType: "monitor",
-          sort: { name: SortOrder.Ascending },
-        },
-      ];
-
-      for (const expectation of expectations) {
-        const component: DashboardBaseComponent = onlyComponentOfType(
-          config,
-          expectation.componentType,
-        );
-        const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
-          config,
-          component,
-          requestedQuery: HOSTILE_QUERY,
-        });
-
-        expect(`${labelOf(component)} lists ${policy.resourceType}`).toBe(
-          `${labelOf(component)} lists ${expectation.resourceType}`,
-        );
-        expect(policy.sort).toEqual(expectation.sort);
+  describe("the SLO List", () => {
+    function sloList(config: DashboardViewConfig): DashboardBaseComponent {
+      const lists: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = componentsOfType(
+        config,
+        DashboardComponentType.SloList,
+      );
 
-        // The cap is the widget's own stored one, not the request's 100000.
-        expect(`${labelOf(component)} reads ${policy.limit} rows`).toBe(
-          `${labelOf(component)} reads ${String(
-            argumentsOf(component)["maxRows"],
-          )} rows`,
-        );
-        expect(policy.limit).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-        expect(policy.limit).toBeLessThanOrEqual(LIMIT_PER_PROJECT);
-      }
-    });
+      expect(lists).toHaveLength(1);
+      return lists[0] as DashboardBaseComponent;
+    }
 
-    it("publishes only the columns the incident list renders", () => {
+    /*
+     * The fleet as published: every ACTIVE objective in the dashboard's
+     * project, least budget first, capped by the widget's own stored maxRows.
+     * Archived objectives are not evaluated and never reach a public page.
+     */
+    it("lists every active SLO in the dashboard's project and nothing the request names", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const select: JSONObject = buildPolicy({
+      const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
         config,
-        component: onlyComponentOfType(
-          config,
-          DashboardComponentType.IncidentList,
-        ),
-      }).select;
-
-      expect(select).toEqual({
-        _id: true,
-        title: true,
-        createdAt: true,
-        currentIncidentState: { name: true, color: true },
-        incidentSeverity: { name: true, color: true },
+        component: sloList(config),
+        requestedQuery: HOSTILE_QUERY,
       });
 
-      /*
-       * An incident's title and state are what the widget draws. Its write-up
-       * is not: the description, the root cause, the remediation notes and
-       * the postmortem are internal narrative, and the telemetry query and
-       * monitor bindings describe the project's topology.
-       */
-      expectSelectPublishesNothingSensitive({
-        modelName: "Incident",
-        model: new Incident(),
-        select,
-        sensitiveColumns: [
-          "description",
-          "rootCause",
-          "remediationNotes",
-          "postmortemNote",
-          "postmortemAttachments",
-          "telemetryQuery",
-          "customFields",
-          "monitors",
-          "monitorSummary",
-          "labels",
-          "onCallDutyPolicies",
-          "isPrivate",
-          "createdByUserId",
-          "seriesLabels",
-        ],
+      expect(policy.resourceType).toBe("slo-list");
+      expect(routeQuery(policy)).toEqual({
+        isArchived: false,
+        projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID,
       });
+      // Enabled first: a disabled SLO's frozen budget never tops the list.
+      expect(policy.sort).toEqual({
+        isEnabled: SortOrder.Descending,
+        errorBudgetRemainingPercentage: SortOrder.Ascending,
+        name: SortOrder.Ascending,
+      });
+      expect(Object.keys(policy.sort)).toEqual([
+        "isEnabled",
+        "errorBudgetRemainingPercentage",
+        "name",
+      ]);
+      expect(policy.limit).toBe(SLO_LIST_DEFAULT_MAX_ROWS);
+      expect(policy.limit).toBeLessThanOrEqual(LIMIT_PER_PROJECT);
     });
 
-    it("publishes only the columns the alert list renders", () => {
+    it("narrows to the picked SLO's row, still active only", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const select: JSONObject = buildPolicy({
-        config,
-        component: onlyComponentOfType(
-          config,
-          DashboardComponentType.AlertList,
-        ),
-      }).select;
-
-      expect(select).toEqual({
-        _id: true,
-        title: true,
-        createdAt: true,
-        currentAlertState: { name: true, color: true },
-        alertSeverity: { name: true, color: true },
-      });
 
-      expectSelectPublishesNothingSensitive({
-        modelName: "Alert",
-        model: new Alert(),
-        select,
-        sensitiveColumns: [
-          "description",
-          "rootCause",
-          "remediationNotes",
-          "telemetryQuery",
-          "customFields",
-          "monitor",
-          "monitorId",
-          "monitorSummary",
-          "labels",
-          "onCallDutyPolicies",
-          "isPrivate",
-          "createdByUserId",
-          "seriesLabels",
-        ],
+      expect(
+        routeQuery(
+          buildPolicy({
+            config,
+            component: sloList(config),
+            requestedVariables: selectionOf(config, PICKED_SLO),
+          }),
+        ),
+      ).toEqual({
+        isArchived: false,
+        name: PICKED_SLO,
+        projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID,
       });
     });
 
-    it("publishes only the columns the monitor list renders", () => {
+    /*
+     * The SLO widget's seven display fields plus `isEnabled`. A disabled SLO
+     * keeps the status it was frozen at, so without the flag the public list
+     * published that status as live (regression). The flag is withheld from
+     * the single-SLO widget, which has no use for it.
+     */
+    it("publishes the SLO widget's seven display fields plus isEnabled, and nothing else", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
       const select: JSONObject = buildPolicy({
         config,
-        component: onlyComponentOfType(
-          config,
-          DashboardComponentType.MonitorList,
-        ),
+        component: sloList(config),
       }).select;
 
-      expect(select).toEqual({
-        _id: true,
-        name: true,
-        monitorType: true,
-        currentMonitorStatus: { name: true, color: true },
-      });
-
-      /*
-       * The monitor list is the one on this dashboard with credentials behind
-       * it. A monitor's steps carry the request it makes — URLs, headers,
-       * bodies — and three columns are literally secret keys that let a
-       * caller post as that monitor.
-       */
+      expect(select).toEqual({ ...PUBLISHED_SLO_SELECT, isEnabled: true });
       expectSelectPublishesNothingSensitive({
-        modelName: "Monitor",
-        model: new Monitor(),
+        model: new ServiceLevelObjective(),
         select,
-        sensitiveColumns: [
-          "monitorSteps",
-          "serverMonitorSecretKey",
-          "incomingRequestSecretKey",
-          "incomingEmailSecretKey",
-          "incomingMonitorRequest",
-          "incomingEmailMonitorRequest",
-          "serverMonitorResponse",
-          "customFields",
-          "description",
-          "labels",
-          "slug",
-          "dependsOnMonitors",
-          "monitoringInterval",
-          "createdByUserId",
-        ],
+        sensitiveColumns: SENSITIVE_SLO_COLUMNS.filter(
+          (column: string): boolean => {
+            return column !== "isEnabled";
+          },
+        ),
       });
     });
-  });
 
-  describe("every component on the template", () => {
-    /*
-     * The fall-through guard. Walking the whole config — not just the widgets
-     * this file has an opinion about — is what proves that no widget kind the
-     * template ships reaches the public list endpoint by accident. A widget
-     * added to the template later either appears in the expected map above,
-     * or it must be refused; there is no third outcome, and "silently built a
-     * policy nobody reviewed" is exactly the one worth failing on.
-     */
-    it("either lists a known resource or is refused, with nothing in between", () => {
+    it("applies a stored status filter, and refuses one that is not a real status", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const components: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> = config.components;
-
-      expect(components.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      const outcomes: Array<string> = components.map(
-        (component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> ${outcomeOf({ config, component })}`;
-        },
-      );
+      const list: DashboardBaseComponent = sloList(config);
 
-      expect(outcomes).toEqual(
-        components.map((component: DashboardBaseComponent): string => {
-          return `${labelOf(component)} -> ${expectedOutcomeOf(component)}`;
-        }),
-      );
+      const filtered: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
+        config,
+        component: {
+          ...list,
+          arguments: {
+            ...argumentsOf(list),
+            sloStatuses: [SloStatus.AtRisk, SloStatus.BudgetExhausted],
+          },
+        } as DashboardBaseComponent,
+      });
 
+      expect(filtered.query["sloStatus"]).toBeInstanceOf(Includes);
+      expect((filtered.query["sloStatus"] as Includes).values).toEqual([
+        SloStatus.AtRisk,
+        SloStatus.BudgetExhausted,
+      ]);
       /*
-       * Guards: a template that listed everything, or nothing, would pass the
-       * comparison above only because the expectations were derived from it.
+       * A disabled SLO's status is frozen, so a status filter matches enabled
+       * SLOs only — the same predicate the browser list sends.
        */
-      const listed: Array<string> = outcomes.filter(
-        (outcome: string): boolean => {
-          return outcome.includes(" -> lists ");
-        },
-      );
-      const refused: Array<string> = outcomes.filter(
-        (outcome: string): boolean => {
-          return outcome.includes(" -> refused: ");
-        },
-      );
+      expect(filtered.query["isEnabled"]).toBe(true);
+      expect(routeQuery(buildPolicy({ config, component: list }))).toEqual({
+        isArchived: false,
+        projectId: DASHBOARD_PROJECT_ID,
+      });
 
-      expect(listed.length).toBe(
-        Object.keys(PUBLIC_LIST_RESOURCE_BY_COMPONENT_TYPE).length,
-      );
-      expect(refused.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-      expect(listed.length + refused.length).toBe(components.length);
+      for (const brokenStatuses of [["Everything"], "At Risk", [3]]) {
+        expect(() => {
+          return buildPolicy({
+            config,
+            component: {
+              ...list,
+              arguments: { ...argumentsOf(list), sloStatuses: brokenStatuses },
+            } as DashboardBaseComponent,
+          });
+        }).toThrow(BadDataException);
+      }
     });
 
-    /*
-     * Nothing that does resolve may resolve to an empty policy: a blank
-     * resource type would fail the route's resource check for the wrong
-     * reason, and a blank select would hand the serializer a whole row.
-     */
-    it("gives every widget that does resolve a complete policy", () => {
+    it("takes its row cap from the stored widget, clamped to the project ceiling", () => {
       const config: DashboardViewConfig = storedConfig();
-      const listWidgets: Array<DashboardBaseComponent> =
-        config.components.filter(
-          (component: DashboardBaseComponent): boolean => {
-            return Boolean(
-              PUBLIC_LIST_RESOURCE_BY_COMPONENT_TYPE[component.componentType],
-            );
-          },
-        );
-
-      expect(listWidgets.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-
-      for (const component of listWidgets) {
-        const policy: PublicDashboardResourceListPolicyResult = buildPolicy({
-          config,
-          component,
-        });
-
-        expect(
-          `${labelOf(component)} resource "${policy.resourceType}"`,
-        ).not.toBe(`${labelOf(component)} resource ""`);
+      const list: DashboardBaseComponent = sloList(config);
+
+      for (const [maxRows, expected] of [
+        [10, 10],
+        [LIMIT_PER_PROJECT * 10, LIMIT_PER_PROJECT],
+        [0, SLO_LIST_DEFAULT_MAX_ROWS],
+        [undefined, SLO_LIST_DEFAULT_MAX_ROWS],
+      ] as Array<[number | undefined, number]>) {
         expect(
-          `${labelOf(component)} selects ${Object.keys(policy.select).length} field(s)`,
-        ).not.toBe(`${labelOf(component)} selects 0 field(s)`);
-        expect(Object.keys(policy.sort).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-        expect(policy.limit).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+          buildPolicy({
+            config,
+            component: {
+              ...list,
+              arguments: { ...argumentsOf(list), maxRows },
+            } as DashboardBaseComponent,
+            requestedQuery: { limit: 100000 },
+          }).limit,
+        ).toBe(expected);
       }
     });
   });