@oneuptime/common 12.0.33 → 12.0.34

package/Tests/Types/Monitor/IotAlertTemplates.test.ts

@@ -2,22 +2,27 @@ import {
   IoTAlertTemplate,
   IoTAlertTemplateArgs,
   IoTAlertTemplateCategory,
+  buildIoTMonitorConfig,
   getAllIoTAlertTemplates,
   getIoTAlertTemplateById,
   getIoTAlertTemplatesByCategory,
 } from "../../../Types/Monitor/IotAlertTemplates";
 import MonitorStep from "../../../Types/Monitor/MonitorStep";
+import { hasRecoveryDeadBand } from "./Utils/RecommendationCriteriaAssertions";
 import MonitorStepIoTMonitor from "../../../Types/Monitor/MonitorStepIoTMonitor";
 import MetricsAggregationType from "../../../Types/Metrics/MetricsAggregationType";
 import {
+  EvaluateOverTimeType,
   FilterType,
   NoDataPolicy,
 } from "../../../Types/Monitor/CriteriaFilter";
+import { getIoTMetricByMetricName } from "../../../Types/Monitor/IotMetricCatalog";
+import RollingTime from "../../../Types/RollingTime/RollingTime";
 import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
 
 /*
- * The IoT templates carry two decisions the container templates don't, and
- * both are the point of this suite:
+ * The IoT templates carry decisions the container templates don't, and each
+ * one is the point of this suite:
  *
  *   1. INVERTED thresholds. "Bad" for a device is a value that is too LOW —
  *      no heartbeat (iot_device_up < 1), a draining battery (< 20%), a fading
@@ -38,6 +43,16 @@ import ObjectID from "../../../Types/ObjectID";
  *      to 0 and trips `Min(iot_device_up) < 1`. Enabling that on a battery or
  *      temperature threshold would false-alarm for any silent device, so the
  *      other templates must NOT carry it.
+ *
+ *   4. Device Offline is also the only template that is BINARY, the only one
+ *      with a window wider than five minutes, and the only one that fires on
+ *      AnyValue. Those three are one decision seen from three sides, and each
+ *      of them is a bug the moment it appears on a second template — so every
+ *      one is pinned per template AND counted at the catalog level below.
+ *
+ *   5. Every template labels its series with the unit IotMetricCatalog already
+ *      declares, because the criteria root cause prints that unit next to both
+ *      the sample and the threshold.
  */
 
 interface IoTTemplateCase {
@@ -51,6 +66,34 @@ interface IoTTemplateCase {
   onlineFilterType: FilterType;
   threshold: number;
   treatNoDataAsZero: boolean;
+  /*
+   * The metric only ever takes two values, so the fire/recover pair has no
+   * "slightly better" state to sit in and must partition the range exactly.
+   * A dead band here would be UNREACHABLE — `iot_device_up >= 1.1` can never
+   * match — which is the regression this flag pins.
+   */
+  isBinaryMetric: boolean;
+  /*
+   * The rolling window. For Device Offline this is the silence grace period a
+   * duty-cycled device is allowed, not a detection latency — see the sweep
+   * below.
+   */
+  rollingTime: RollingTime;
+  /*
+   * The quantifier on the FIRING side. AllValues (sustained) everywhere except
+   * Device Offline, whose signal is an explicit event rather than a level.
+   */
+  fireAggregation: EvaluateOverTimeType;
+  // The unit IotMetricCatalog declares for `metricName`, if any.
+  legendUnit: string | undefined;
+  // The threshold as the incident title states it, in the unit it compares.
+  incidentTitleFragment: string;
+  /*
+   * The complete set of values the metric can take, for the templates whose
+   * metric has a finite domain. Set only for Device Offline today; a future
+   * binary template must set it too, so the reachability sweep covers it.
+   */
+  metricValueDomain?: Array<number> | undefined;
 }
 
 const IOT_TEMPLATES: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = [
@@ -66,6 +109,13 @@ const IOT_TEMPLATES: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = [
     onlineFilterType: FilterType.GreaterThanOrEqualTo,
     threshold: 1,
     treatNoDataAsZero: true,
+    isBinaryMetric: true,
+    rollingTime: RollingTime.Past30Minutes,
+    fireAggregation: EvaluateOverTimeType.AnyValue,
+    // iot_device_up carries no unit in the catalog — it is a bare 0/1 gauge.
+    legendUnit: undefined,
+    incidentTitleFragment: "Device Offline",
+    metricValueDomain: [0, 1],
   },
   {
     id: "iot-low-battery",
@@ -78,6 +128,11 @@ const IOT_TEMPLATES: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = [
     onlineFilterType: FilterType.GreaterThanOrEqualTo,
     threshold: 20,
     treatNoDataAsZero: false,
+    isBinaryMetric: false,
+    rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+    fireAggregation: EvaluateOverTimeType.AllValues,
+    legendUnit: "%",
+    incidentTitleFragment: "Low Battery (<20%)",
   },
   {
     id: "iot-weak-signal",
@@ -91,6 +146,11 @@ const IOT_TEMPLATES: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = [
     // dBm is negative; -100 is a real threshold, not a placeholder.
     threshold: -100,
     treatNoDataAsZero: false,
+    isBinaryMetric: false,
+    rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+    fireAggregation: EvaluateOverTimeType.AllValues,
+    legendUnit: "dBm",
+    incidentTitleFragment: "Weak Signal (<-100 dBm)",
   },
   {
     id: "iot-high-temperature",
@@ -104,6 +164,11 @@ const IOT_TEMPLATES: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = [
     onlineFilterType: FilterType.LessThanOrEqualTo,
     threshold: 70,
     treatNoDataAsZero: false,
+    isBinaryMetric: false,
+    rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+    fireAggregation: EvaluateOverTimeType.AllValues,
+    legendUnit: "°C",
+    incidentTitleFragment: "High Temperature (>70°C)",
   },
   {
     id: "iot-high-cpu",
@@ -117,6 +182,15 @@ const IOT_TEMPLATES: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = [
     // iot_cpu_usage_ratio is a 0-1 ratio, so 0.9 == 90%.
     threshold: 0.9,
     treatNoDataAsZero: false,
+    isBinaryMetric: false,
+    rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+    fireAggregation: EvaluateOverTimeType.AllValues,
+    legendUnit: "ratio",
+    /*
+     * The title states the ratio, not the percentage, because the criteria
+     * compares 0.9 and the root cause prints "ratio".
+     */
+    incidentTitleFragment: "High CPU Usage (ratio >0.9)",
   },
 ];
 
@@ -139,6 +213,21 @@ function getIoTMonitor(step: MonitorStep): MonitorStepIoTMonitor {
   return iotMonitor;
 }
 
+function getCriteriaInstances(id: string): Array<any> {
+  const step: MonitorStep =
+    getIoTAlertTemplateById(id)!.getMonitorStep(buildArgs());
+  return step.data?.monitorCriteria.data
+    ?.monitorCriteriaInstanceArray as Array<any>;
+}
+
+function getUnhealthyFilter(id: string): any {
+  return getCriteriaInstances(id)[0].data.filters[0];
+}
+
+function getHealthyFilter(id: string): any {
+  return getCriteriaInstances(id)[1].data.filters[0];
+}
+
 describe("IotAlertTemplates", () => {
   test("every documented template id is registered and the suite is exhaustive", () => {
     const ids: Array<string> = getAllIoTAlertTemplates().map(
@@ -223,6 +312,13 @@ describe("IotAlertTemplates", () => {
       expect(queryData.filterData.metricName).toBe(tc.metricName);
       expect(queryData.filterData.aggegationType).toBe(tc.aggregation);
 
+      /*
+       * The window each template evaluates over. Left unpinned, Device
+       * Offline's silence grace period could be narrowed back to five minutes
+       * without a single test noticing.
+       */
+      expect(monitor.rollingTime).toBe(tc.rollingTime);
+
       /*
        * Decision (2): one incident per device — group by the raw datapoint
        * label, which is NOT resource-prefixed.
@@ -235,13 +331,9 @@ describe("IotAlertTemplates", () => {
   );
 
   test.each(IOT_TEMPLATES)(
-    "$id unhealthy/healthy criteria partition the range at $threshold",
+    "$id unhealthy/healthy criteria partition $threshold, with a dead band wherever one is meaningful",
     (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
-      const template: IoTAlertTemplate = getIoTAlertTemplateById(tc.id)!;
-      const step: MonitorStep = template.getMonitorStep(buildArgs());
-
-      const instances: Array<any> = step.data?.monitorCriteria.data
-        ?.monitorCriteriaInstanceArray as Array<any>;
+      const instances: Array<any> = getCriteriaInstances(tc.id);
       expect(instances).toHaveLength(2);
       const [offline, online] = instances;
 
@@ -255,7 +347,36 @@ describe("IotAlertTemplates", () => {
         tc.metricAlias,
       );
       expect(offlineFilter.value).toBe(tc.threshold);
-      expect(onlineFilter.value).toBe(tc.threshold);
+
+      if (tc.isBinaryMetric) {
+        /*
+         * iot_device_up is 0 or 1. There is no "slightly better" value to sit
+         * in, so the pair partitions the range exactly — and a dead band ABOVE
+         * 1 would be unreachable, which is the bug this pins.
+         */
+        expect(onlineFilter.value).toBe(tc.threshold);
+      } else {
+        /*
+         * The healthy criteria recovers at a threshold strictly INSIDE the
+         * firing one, so a metric hovering at the boundary cannot satisfy
+         * both on consecutive evaluations. This assertion used to be
+         * `expect(onlineFilter.value).toBe(tc.threshold)` — the two criteria
+         * exactly partitioned the range, which is the flapping configuration
+         * this suite existed to lock in.
+         */
+        expect(
+          hasRecoveryDeadBand(
+            {
+              filterType: offlineFilter.filterType,
+              value: offlineFilter.value as number,
+            },
+            {
+              filterType: onlineFilter.filterType,
+              value: onlineFilter.value as number,
+            },
+          ),
+        ).toBe(true);
+      }
 
       /*
        * Decision (1): pin the exact comparison direction per template — the
@@ -271,20 +392,229 @@ describe("IotAlertTemplates", () => {
     },
   );
 
+  test("iot-device-offline's healthy threshold is reachable by a 0/1 metric", () => {
+    const filter: any = getHealthyFilter("iot-device-offline");
+
+    expect(filter.filterType).toBe(FilterType.GreaterThanOrEqualTo);
+    /*
+     * A 10% dead band would put this at 1.1. iot_device_up only ever takes 0
+     * or 1 (MqttTelemetryMapper emits exactly 1/0; IoTSnapshotScan reads it
+     * as `isUp = rawValue >= 1`; the per-minute bucket reducer is Min, so it
+     * cannot lift a sample above 1 either). Anything above 1 makes the
+     * healthy criteria unmatchable: MonitorResource then takes its "no
+     * criteria met" branch every evaluation, the configured Online status is
+     * dead code, and a device that comes back up never produces an Online
+     * transition.
+     */
+    expect(filter.value).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1);
+    expect(filter.value).toBe(1);
+  });
+
+  test.each(
+    IOT_TEMPLATES.filter((tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+      return Boolean(tc.metricValueDomain);
+    }),
+  )(
+    "$id healthy criteria is satisfiable somewhere in its metric's value domain",
+    (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+      /*
+       * Generalises the guard above so the next template over a finite-domain
+       * metric cannot ship the same defect: at least one value the metric can
+       * actually emit has to satisfy the recovery comparison.
+       */
+      const filter: any = getHealthyFilter(tc.id);
+
+      const satisfied: Array<number> = tc.metricValueDomain!.filter(
+        (v: number) => {
+          return filter.filterType === FilterType.GreaterThanOrEqualTo
+            ? v >= filter.value
+            : v <= filter.value;
+        },
+      );
+
+      expect(satisfied.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+    },
+  );
+
   test.each(IOT_TEMPLATES)(
-    "$id applies TreatAsZero only when it is the Device Offline template",
+    "$id fires with $fireAggregation and recovers with AllValues",
     (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
-      const template: IoTAlertTemplate = getIoTAlertTemplateById(tc.id)!;
-      const step: MonitorStep = template.getMonitorStep(buildArgs());
+      expect(
+        getUnhealthyFilter(tc.id).metricMonitorOptions.metricAggregationType,
+      ).toBe(tc.fireAggregation);
+
+      // Recovery is always strictly the stronger quantifier.
+      expect(
+        getHealthyFilter(tc.id).metricMonitorOptions.metricAggregationType,
+      ).toBe(EvaluateOverTimeType.AllValues);
+    },
+  );
+
+  test("iot-device-offline tolerates a duty cycle longer than five minutes", () => {
+    /*
+     * A registered device that is silent for the whole window reaches the
+     * comparator as the SCALAR 0 (MetricMonitorCriteria's TreatAsZero path
+     * passes `0`, not `[0]`), and CompareCriteria short-circuits a scalar
+     * before any quantifier runs — so sustained evaluation gives absence no
+     * protection at all and the rolling window is the only silence grace
+     * period there is. At five minutes every battery-powered device on a
+     * 10/15/30-minute push interval was declared Offline in every window it
+     * skipped and resolved in the window it pushed: one incident and one
+     * alert per window, forever.
+     */
+    const step: MonitorStep =
+      getIoTAlertTemplateById("iot-device-offline")!.getMonitorStep(
+        buildArgs(),
+      );
+    expect(getIoTMonitor(step).rollingTime).toBe(RollingTime.Past30Minutes);
+
+    /*
+     * ...and the MQTT Last Will path must still page on the next evaluation.
+     * Under AllValues an explicit `iot_device_up = 0` could not fire until
+     * every healthy bucket had aged out, turning a documented next-scrape
+     * detection into a 30-minute one.
+     */
+    expect(
+      getUnhealthyFilter("iot-device-offline").metricMonitorOptions
+        .metricAggregationType,
+    ).toBe(EvaluateOverTimeType.AnyValue);
+  });
+
+  test("exactly one template departs from sustained evaluation", () => {
+    /*
+     * AnyValue is the escape hatch RecommendationCriteriaBuilder sanctions
+     * only for a signal that genuinely is an event rather than a level. If a
+     * second template ever claims it, this fails and forces a review rather
+     * than letting the flapping default creep back in.
+     */
+    const anyValue: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = IOT_TEMPLATES.filter(
+      (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+        return tc.fireAggregation === EvaluateOverTimeType.AnyValue;
+      },
+    );
+    expect(anyValue).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(anyValue[0]!.id).toBe("iot-device-offline");
+  });
+
+  test("exactly one template widens its window past five minutes", () => {
+    /*
+     * The counterpart of the TreatAsZero canary: a wide window is only
+     * justified for the template that treats absence as a value. Anything
+     * else adopting it would just delay real alerts.
+     */
+    const widened: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = IOT_TEMPLATES.filter(
+      (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+        return tc.rollingTime !== RollingTime.Past5Minutes;
+      },
+    );
+    expect(widened).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(widened[0]!.id).toBe("iot-device-offline");
+    expect(widened[0]!.treatNoDataAsZero).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  test.each(IOT_TEMPLATES)(
+    "$id labels its series with the unit the IoT metric catalog declares",
+    (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+      const monitor: MonitorStepIoTMonitor = getIoTMonitor(
+        getIoTAlertTemplateById(tc.id)!.getMonitorStep(buildArgs()),
+      );
+      const alias: any = (
+        monitor.metricViewConfig.queryConfigs as Array<any>
+      )[0].metricAliasData;
+
+      expect(alias.legendUnit).toBe(tc.legendUnit);
+      /*
+       * Pinned against the catalog too, so the two cannot drift: the criteria
+       * root cause prints this unit next to both the sample and the threshold
+       * (MetricMonitorCriteria defaults thresholdUnit to it), so dropping it
+       * silently produces "is -103.2 which is less than -100".
+       */
+      expect(alias.legendUnit).toBe(
+        getIoTMetricByMetricName(tc.metricName)?.unit,
+      );
+    },
+  );
+
+  test("buildIoTMonitorConfig defaults legendUnit from the catalog and lets a caller override it", () => {
+    const fromCatalog: MonitorStepIoTMonitor = buildIoTMonitorConfig({
+      fleetIdentifier: "f",
+      metricName: "iot_temperature_celsius",
+      metricAlias: "t",
+      rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+      aggregationType: MetricsAggregationType.Max,
+    });
+    expect(
+      (fromCatalog.metricViewConfig.queryConfigs as Array<any>)[0]
+        .metricAliasData.legendUnit,
+    ).toBe("°C");
+
+    const overridden: MonitorStepIoTMonitor = buildIoTMonitorConfig({
+      fleetIdentifier: "f",
+      metricName: "iot_temperature_celsius",
+      metricAlias: "t",
+      rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+      aggregationType: MetricsAggregationType.Max,
+      legendUnit: "°F",
+    });
+    expect(
+      (overridden.metricViewConfig.queryConfigs as Array<any>)[0]
+        .metricAliasData.legendUnit,
+    ).toBe("°F");
+  });
+
+  test("a metric the catalog does not know stays unitless", () => {
+    /*
+     * The custom-metric picker path shares this builder, so an unknown metric
+     * name must not invent a unit — a wrong unit would be converted against
+     * the native one and change the number the threshold compares.
+     */
+    const cfg: MonitorStepIoTMonitor = buildIoTMonitorConfig({
+      fleetIdentifier: "f",
+      metricName: "custom_thing",
+      metricAlias: "c",
+      rollingTime: RollingTime.Past5Minutes,
+      aggregationType: MetricsAggregationType.Avg,
+    });
+    expect(
+      (cfg.metricViewConfig.queryConfigs as Array<any>)[0].metricAliasData
+        .legendUnit,
+    ).toBeUndefined();
+  });
+
+  test.each(IOT_TEMPLATES)(
+    "$id states its own threshold in the incident title, in the unit it actually compares",
+    (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+      const offline: any = getCriteriaInstances(tc.id)[0];
+
+      expect(offline.data.incidents[0].title).toContain(
+        tc.incidentTitleFragment,
+      );
+      expect(offline.data.alerts[0].title).toBe(
+        offline.data.incidents[0].title,
+      );
+    },
+  );
 
-      const offline: any = (
-        step.data?.monitorCriteria.data
-          ?.monitorCriteriaInstanceArray as Array<any>
-      )[0];
-      const online: any = (
-        step.data?.monitorCriteria.data
-          ?.monitorCriteriaInstanceArray as Array<any>
-      )[1];
+  test("iot-high-cpu does not promise a percentage it never prints", () => {
+    /*
+     * iot_cpu_usage_ratio is stored as a raw 0-1 ratio (IoTSnapshotScan scales
+     * it to percent only for the device inventory column), so the criteria
+     * compares 0.9 and the root cause prints "0.94 ratio". A title that says
+     * ">90%" leaves the reader converting in their head — and the threshold
+     * itself must stay 0.9, because rewriting it as 90 would break every MQTT
+     * device whose samples have no native unit to convert from.
+     */
+    const offline: any = getCriteriaInstances("iot-high-cpu")[0];
+
+    expect(offline.data.filters[0].value).toBe(0.9);
+    expect(offline.data.incidents[0].title).not.toContain("90%");
+    expect(offline.data.alerts[0].title).not.toContain("90%");
+  });
+
+  test.each(IOT_TEMPLATES)(
+    "$id applies TreatAsZero only when it is the Device Offline template",
+    (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+      const [offline, online]: Array<any> = getCriteriaInstances(tc.id);
 
       const offlineNoDataPolicy: NoDataPolicy | undefined =
         offline.data.filters[0].metricMonitorOptions.onNoDataPolicy;
@@ -317,4 +647,29 @@ describe("IotAlertTemplates", () => {
     expect(withTreatAsZero).toHaveLength(1);
     expect(withTreatAsZero[0]!.id).toBe("iot-device-offline");
   });
+
+  test("exactly one template is a binary metric, and it is the one that opts out of the dead band", () => {
+    /*
+     * The dead band and the binary carve-out are one decision. If a template
+     * is added over another 0/1 gauge and forgets `isBinaryMetric`, its
+     * recovery threshold lands at 1.1 and the monitor can never report
+     * healthy — the exact regression the flag exists to prevent.
+     */
+    const binary: Array<IoTTemplateCase> = IOT_TEMPLATES.filter(
+      (tc: IoTTemplateCase) => {
+        return tc.isBinaryMetric;
+      },
+    );
+    expect(binary).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(binary[0]!.id).toBe("iot-device-offline");
+
+    for (const tc of IOT_TEMPLATES) {
+      const healthyValue: number = getHealthyFilter(tc.id).value as number;
+      if (tc.isBinaryMetric) {
+        expect(healthyValue).toBe(tc.threshold);
+      } else {
+        expect(healthyValue).not.toBe(tc.threshold);
+      }
+    }
+  });
 });