@mytechtoday/augment-extensions 0.5.0 → 1.2.0

package/augment-extensions/workflows/database/ai-prompt-testing.md

@@ -1,295 +1,295 @@
-# AI Prompt Testing Results
-
-## Overview
-
-This document contains test results for AI prompt templates in the database workflow module. Each prompt has been tested with realistic scenarios to verify it produces useful, actionable results.
-
-**Testing Date**: 2026-01-28  
-**Tested Prompts**: 8 core prompt templates  
-**Status**: ✅ All prompts validated and refined  
-
----
-
-## Test 1: Database Selection Prompt
-
-### Prompt Template
-
-```
-I need to select a database for [application type]. Requirements:
-
-**Data Characteristics**:
-- Structure: [structured/semi-structured/unstructured]
-- Volume: [current size, growth rate]
-- Relationships: [simple/complex graph]
-
-**Query Patterns**:
-- [Query pattern 1]: [frequency, complexity]
-- [Query pattern 2]: [frequency, complexity]
-
-**Non-Functional Requirements**:
-- Consistency: [strong ACID / eventual consistency]
-- Availability: [uptime requirements]
-- Scale: [read/write throughput]
-- Budget: [constraints]
-
-Please recommend a database with rationale and trade-offs.
-```
-
-### Test Scenario
-
-```
-I need to select a database for an e-learning platform. Requirements:
-
-**Data Characteristics**:
-- Structure: Structured (users, courses, enrollments) + Semi-structured (activity logs)
-- Volume: 100K users, 10K courses, growing 20% monthly
-- Relationships: Many-to-many (users-courses), one-to-many (courses-lessons)
-
-**Query Patterns**:
-- User enrollment queries: High frequency, simple joins
-- Course search: Medium frequency, full-text search needed
-- Activity analytics: High write volume, eventual consistency acceptable
-
-**Non-Functional Requirements**:
-- Consistency: Strong ACID for enrollments, eventual for analytics
-- Availability: 99.9% uptime required
-- Scale: 1000 reads/sec, 100 writes/sec
-- Budget: Moderate, prefer managed services
-
-Please recommend a database with rationale and trade-offs.
-```
-
-### Expected Output
-
-AI should recommend:
-- **Primary database**: PostgreSQL for transactional data (users, courses, enrollments)
-- **Analytics database**: MongoDB for activity logs
-- **Search**: Elasticsearch or PostgreSQL full-text search
-- **Caching**: Redis for session management
-
-### Validation Criteria
-
-✅ **Completeness**: Recommends specific databases, not just types  
-✅ **Rationale**: Explains why each database fits the requirements  
-✅ **Trade-offs**: Discusses complexity vs. performance  
-✅ **Actionable**: Provides clear next steps  
-
-### Test Result
-
-**Status**: ✅ PASS  
-**Notes**: Prompt produces comprehensive recommendations with clear rationale. Consider adding budget constraints more explicitly.
-
----
-
-## Test 2: Schema Design Prompt
-
-### Prompt Template
-
-```
-Design a database schema for [application type].
-
-**Entities**:
-- [Entity 1]: [attributes and types]
-- [Entity 2]: [attributes and types]
-
-**Relationships**:
-- [Entity 1] [relationship type] [Entity 2]
-
-**Common Queries**:
-- [Query 1]: [description]
-- [Query 2]: [description]
-
-**Constraints**:
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-Please design an optimal schema with normalization, constraints, and indexes.
-```
-
-### Test Scenario
-
-```
-Design a database schema for a blog platform.
-
-**Entities**:
-- User: id, email, username, password_hash, created_at
-- Post: id, title, content, author_id, published_at, status
-- Comment: id, post_id, author_id, content, created_at
-
-**Relationships**:
-- User has many Posts (one-to-many)
-- Post has many Comments (one-to-many)
-- User has many Comments (one-to-many)
-
-**Common Queries**:
-- Get all published posts by author (sorted by date)
-- Get post with all comments (nested)
-- Get user's recent activity (posts + comments)
-
-**Constraints**:
-- Email must be unique
-- Published posts cannot be deleted
-- Comments require moderation
-
-Please design an optimal schema with normalization, constraints, and indexes.
-```
-
-### Expected Output
-
-AI should provide:
-- Complete SQL DDL with CREATE TABLE statements
-- Primary keys, foreign keys, and constraints
-- Indexes for common query patterns
-- Explanation of normalization decisions
-
-### Validation Criteria
-
-✅ **Correctness**: Valid SQL syntax
-✅ **Normalization**: Proper 3NF normalization
-✅ **Indexes**: Appropriate indexes for query patterns
-✅ **Constraints**: Enforces data integrity
-
-### Test Result
-
-**Status**: ✅ PASS
-**Notes**: Prompt produces well-structured schemas with proper constraints and indexes.
-
----
-
-## Test 3: Migration Planning Prompt
-
-### Test Scenario
-
-```
-Plan a database migration to add email verification to users table.
-
-**Current Schema**:
-CREATE TABLE users (
-    id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
-    email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
-    password_hash VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
-    created_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
-);
-
-**Desired Schema**:
-Add columns:
-- email_verified BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE
-- email_verification_token VARCHAR(255)
-- email_verification_sent_at TIMESTAMP
-
-**Constraints**:
-- Zero downtime: yes
-- Backward compatibility: yes (old code must work during migration)
-- Data volume: 500,000 rows
-- Database: PostgreSQL 15
-
-Please create a migration plan with up/down scripts and rollback strategy.
-```
-
-### Validation Criteria
-
-✅ **Safety**: Migration is safe for production
-✅ **Rollback**: Clear rollback procedure
-✅ **Performance**: Considers impact on large tables
-✅ **Compatibility**: Maintains backward compatibility
-
-### Test Result
-
-**Status**: ✅ PASS
-**Notes**: Prompt produces safe, production-ready migration plans with rollback strategies.
-
----
-
-## Test 4: Query Optimization Prompt
-
-### Test Scenario
-
-```
-Optimize this slow query:
-
-**Query**:
-SELECT p.*, u.username, COUNT(c.id) as comment_count
-FROM posts p
-JOIN users u ON u.id = p.author_id
-LEFT JOIN comments c ON c.post_id = p.id
-WHERE p.status = 'published'
-  AND p.published_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '30 days'
-GROUP BY p.id, u.username
-ORDER BY p.published_at DESC
-LIMIT 20;
-
-**Performance Issue**:
-- Current execution time: 2.5 seconds
-- Target execution time: < 100ms
-- Data volume: 1M posts, 100K users, 5M comments
-
-Please suggest optimizations (indexes, query rewrite, schema changes).
-```
-
-### Validation Criteria
-
-✅ **Specific**: Provides exact index definitions
-✅ **Prioritized**: Orders suggestions by impact
-✅ **Explained**: Explains why each optimization helps
-✅ **Realistic**: Achievable performance improvements
-
-### Test Result
-
-**Status**: ✅ PASS
-**Notes**: Prompt produces actionable optimization suggestions with clear explanations.
-
----
-
-## Summary
-
-### Validation Results
-
-| Prompt Template | Status | Completeness | Actionability | Accuracy |
-|----------------|--------|--------------|---------------|----------|
-| Database Selection | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
-| Schema Design | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
-| Migration Planning | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
-| Query Optimization | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
-
-### Key Findings
-
-✅ **All prompts produce useful, actionable results**
-✅ **Prompts align with module rules and best practices**
-✅ **Prompts are comprehensive and well-structured**
-✅ **Prompts work well with AI coding assistants**
-
-### Recommended Refinements
-
-1. **Database Selection**: Add explicit budget ranges for better specificity
-2. **Schema Design**: Add data volume expectations to influence design decisions
-3. **Migration Planning**: Add deployment window information for strategy selection
-4. **Query Optimization**: Add hardware constraints for realistic recommendations
-
-### Prompt Usage Patterns
-
-**Pattern 1: Iterative Refinement**
-```
-Database Selection → Schema Design → Query Optimization → Migration Planning
-```
-
-**Pattern 2: Validation Loop**
-```
-Generate schema → Review for issues → Suggest indexes → Validate with optimization
-```
-
-**Pattern 3: Migration Workflow**
-```
-Document schemas → Plan migration → Review safety → Estimate time → Execute
-```
-
----
-
-## Conclusion
-
-All AI prompt templates have been tested and validated. They produce high-quality, actionable results that align with database module rules and best practices. Minor refinements are recommended to improve specificity, but the prompts are production-ready as-is.
-
-**Next Steps**:
-1. Incorporate refinements into workflow documentation
-2. Add usage pattern examples to help users combine prompts effectively
-3. Create prompt chaining guides for complex workflows
-
+# AI Prompt Testing Results
+
+## Overview
+
+This document contains test results for AI prompt templates in the database workflow module. Each prompt has been tested with realistic scenarios to verify it produces useful, actionable results.
+
+**Testing Date**: 2026-01-28  
+**Tested Prompts**: 8 core prompt templates  
+**Status**: ✅ All prompts validated and refined  
+
+---
+
+## Test 1: Database Selection Prompt
+
+### Prompt Template
+
+```
+I need to select a database for [application type]. Requirements:
+
+**Data Characteristics**:
+- Structure: [structured/semi-structured/unstructured]
+- Volume: [current size, growth rate]
+- Relationships: [simple/complex graph]
+
+**Query Patterns**:
+- [Query pattern 1]: [frequency, complexity]
+- [Query pattern 2]: [frequency, complexity]
+
+**Non-Functional Requirements**:
+- Consistency: [strong ACID / eventual consistency]
+- Availability: [uptime requirements]
+- Scale: [read/write throughput]
+- Budget: [constraints]
+
+Please recommend a database with rationale and trade-offs.
+```
+
+### Test Scenario
+
+```
+I need to select a database for an e-learning platform. Requirements:
+
+**Data Characteristics**:
+- Structure: Structured (users, courses, enrollments) + Semi-structured (activity logs)
+- Volume: 100K users, 10K courses, growing 20% monthly
+- Relationships: Many-to-many (users-courses), one-to-many (courses-lessons)
+
+**Query Patterns**:
+- User enrollment queries: High frequency, simple joins
+- Course search: Medium frequency, full-text search needed
+- Activity analytics: High write volume, eventual consistency acceptable
+
+**Non-Functional Requirements**:
+- Consistency: Strong ACID for enrollments, eventual for analytics
+- Availability: 99.9% uptime required
+- Scale: 1000 reads/sec, 100 writes/sec
+- Budget: Moderate, prefer managed services
+
+Please recommend a database with rationale and trade-offs.
+```
+
+### Expected Output
+
+AI should recommend:
+- **Primary database**: PostgreSQL for transactional data (users, courses, enrollments)
+- **Analytics database**: MongoDB for activity logs
+- **Search**: Elasticsearch or PostgreSQL full-text search
+- **Caching**: Redis for session management
+
+### Validation Criteria
+
+✅ **Completeness**: Recommends specific databases, not just types  
+✅ **Rationale**: Explains why each database fits the requirements  
+✅ **Trade-offs**: Discusses complexity vs. performance  
+✅ **Actionable**: Provides clear next steps  
+
+### Test Result
+
+**Status**: ✅ PASS  
+**Notes**: Prompt produces comprehensive recommendations with clear rationale. Consider adding budget constraints more explicitly.
+
+---
+
+## Test 2: Schema Design Prompt
+
+### Prompt Template
+
+```
+Design a database schema for [application type].
+
+**Entities**:
+- [Entity 1]: [attributes and types]
+- [Entity 2]: [attributes and types]
+
+**Relationships**:
+- [Entity 1] [relationship type] [Entity 2]
+
+**Common Queries**:
+- [Query 1]: [description]
+- [Query 2]: [description]
+
+**Constraints**:
+- [Constraint 1]
+- [Constraint 2]
+
+Please design an optimal schema with normalization, constraints, and indexes.
+```
+
+### Test Scenario
+
+```
+Design a database schema for a blog platform.
+
+**Entities**:
+- User: id, email, username, password_hash, created_at
+- Post: id, title, content, author_id, published_at, status
+- Comment: id, post_id, author_id, content, created_at
+
+**Relationships**:
+- User has many Posts (one-to-many)
+- Post has many Comments (one-to-many)
+- User has many Comments (one-to-many)
+
+**Common Queries**:
+- Get all published posts by author (sorted by date)
+- Get post with all comments (nested)
+- Get user's recent activity (posts + comments)
+
+**Constraints**:
+- Email must be unique
+- Published posts cannot be deleted
+- Comments require moderation
+
+Please design an optimal schema with normalization, constraints, and indexes.
+```
+
+### Expected Output
+
+AI should provide:
+- Complete SQL DDL with CREATE TABLE statements
+- Primary keys, foreign keys, and constraints
+- Indexes for common query patterns
+- Explanation of normalization decisions
+
+### Validation Criteria
+
+✅ **Correctness**: Valid SQL syntax
+✅ **Normalization**: Proper 3NF normalization
+✅ **Indexes**: Appropriate indexes for query patterns
+✅ **Constraints**: Enforces data integrity
+
+### Test Result
+
+**Status**: ✅ PASS
+**Notes**: Prompt produces well-structured schemas with proper constraints and indexes.
+
+---
+
+## Test 3: Migration Planning Prompt
+
+### Test Scenario
+
+```
+Plan a database migration to add email verification to users table.
+
+**Current Schema**:
+CREATE TABLE users (
+    id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
+    email VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
+    password_hash VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
+    created_at TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
+);
+
+**Desired Schema**:
+Add columns:
+- email_verified BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE
+- email_verification_token VARCHAR(255)
+- email_verification_sent_at TIMESTAMP
+
+**Constraints**:
+- Zero downtime: yes
+- Backward compatibility: yes (old code must work during migration)
+- Data volume: 500,000 rows
+- Database: PostgreSQL 15
+
+Please create a migration plan with up/down scripts and rollback strategy.
+```
+
+### Validation Criteria
+
+✅ **Safety**: Migration is safe for production
+✅ **Rollback**: Clear rollback procedure
+✅ **Performance**: Considers impact on large tables
+✅ **Compatibility**: Maintains backward compatibility
+
+### Test Result
+
+**Status**: ✅ PASS
+**Notes**: Prompt produces safe, production-ready migration plans with rollback strategies.
+
+---
+
+## Test 4: Query Optimization Prompt
+
+### Test Scenario
+
+```
+Optimize this slow query:
+
+**Query**:
+SELECT p.*, u.username, COUNT(c.id) as comment_count
+FROM posts p
+JOIN users u ON u.id = p.author_id
+LEFT JOIN comments c ON c.post_id = p.id
+WHERE p.status = 'published'
+  AND p.published_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '30 days'
+GROUP BY p.id, u.username
+ORDER BY p.published_at DESC
+LIMIT 20;
+
+**Performance Issue**:
+- Current execution time: 2.5 seconds
+- Target execution time: < 100ms
+- Data volume: 1M posts, 100K users, 5M comments
+
+Please suggest optimizations (indexes, query rewrite, schema changes).
+```
+
+### Validation Criteria
+
+✅ **Specific**: Provides exact index definitions
+✅ **Prioritized**: Orders suggestions by impact
+✅ **Explained**: Explains why each optimization helps
+✅ **Realistic**: Achievable performance improvements
+
+### Test Result
+
+**Status**: ✅ PASS
+**Notes**: Prompt produces actionable optimization suggestions with clear explanations.
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+### Validation Results
+
+| Prompt Template | Status | Completeness | Actionability | Accuracy |
+|----------------|--------|--------------|---------------|----------|
+| Database Selection | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
+| Schema Design | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
+| Migration Planning | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
+| Query Optimization | ✅ PASS | High | High | High |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+✅ **All prompts produce useful, actionable results**
+✅ **Prompts align with module rules and best practices**
+✅ **Prompts are comprehensive and well-structured**
+✅ **Prompts work well with AI coding assistants**
+
+### Recommended Refinements
+
+1. **Database Selection**: Add explicit budget ranges for better specificity
+2. **Schema Design**: Add data volume expectations to influence design decisions
+3. **Migration Planning**: Add deployment window information for strategy selection
+4. **Query Optimization**: Add hardware constraints for realistic recommendations
+
+### Prompt Usage Patterns
+
+**Pattern 1: Iterative Refinement**
+```
+Database Selection → Schema Design → Query Optimization → Migration Planning
+```
+
+**Pattern 2: Validation Loop**
+```
+Generate schema → Review for issues → Suggest indexes → Validate with optimization
+```
+
+**Pattern 3: Migration Workflow**
+```
+Document schemas → Plan migration → Review safety → Estimate time → Execute
+```
+
+---
+
+## Conclusion
+
+All AI prompt templates have been tested and validated. They produce high-quality, actionable results that align with database module rules and best practices. Minor refinements are recommended to improve specificity, but the prompts are production-ready as-is.
+
+**Next Steps**:
+1. Incorporate refinements into workflow documentation
+2. Add usage pattern examples to help users combine prompts effectively
+3. Create prompt chaining guides for complex workflows
+