@memberjunction/server 6.1.4 → 6.1.6

package/src/__tests__/ResolverBase.isaPromotionCreate.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
+/**
+ * IS-A PROMOTION over the wire — the server half.
+ *
+ * Promotion = an EXISTING parent row gains a subtype ("this Animal is now also a Dog"). Over
+ * GraphQL it arrives as the child's CREATE mutation carrying the EXISTING parent's primary key,
+ * because in IS-A the shared key IS the relationship — the child has no key of its own to mint.
+ *
+ * The defect: `ResolverBase.CreateRecord` did `GetEntityObject` + `NewRecord()` + `SetMany(input)`.
+ * `NewRecord()` recurses into the parent chain and flags the PARENT as new too; `SetMany` then only
+ * overwrites the key. The parent therefore saved as a CREATE — a second copy of a row that already
+ * exists — instead of the child being attached to the existing row.
+ *
+ * These tests drive the REAL `CreateRecord` with REAL `BaseEntity` / `EntityInfo` objects over a
+ * fake provider that (a) constructs entities exactly as `ProviderBase.GetEntityObject` does
+ * (construct → Config → InitializeParentEntity → NewRecord), (b) holds one existing Animal row for
+ * `Load`, and (c) records every `Save` it receives — entity, create-vs-update, key — which is the
+ * observable the bug corrupts.
+ */
+// ResolverBase transitively pulls in type-graphql decorators, which need the
+// Reflect.metadata polyfill at import time.
+import 'reflect-metadata';
+import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vitest';
+import {
+    BaseEntity,
+    CompositeKey,
+    DatabaseProviderBase,
+    EntityInfo,
+    EntitySaveOptions,
+    FieldPermissionAccess,
+    IMetadataProvider,
+    Metadata,
+    UserInfo,
+} from '@memberjunction/core';
+import type { PubSubEngine } from 'type-graphql';
+import { ResolverBase } from '../generic/ResolverBase.js';
+import type { UserPayload } from '../types.js';
+
+// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+// Fixtures — a real two-level IS-A pair: Animals (root) ← Dogs (child), plus a standalone entity
+// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const ROLE_ID = 'D1D2D3D4-0000-4000-8000-00000000R0LE';
+const USER_ID = 'D1D2D3D4-0000-4000-8000-00000000USER';
+const ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID = 'D1D2D3D4-0000-4000-8000-000000000001';
+const DOG_ENTITY_ID = 'D1D2D3D4-0000-4000-8000-000000000002';
+const TOY_ENTITY_ID = 'D1D2D3D4-0000-4000-8000-000000000003';
+/** The Animal row that already exists in the database. */
+const EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID = 'E1E2E3E4-0000-4000-8000-00000000AAAA';
+/** A well-formed key that matches NO row. */
+const MISSING_ANIMAL_ID = 'E1E2E3E4-0000-4000-8000-00000000FFFF';
+
+interface FieldSpec {
+    EntityID: string;
+    Name: string;
+    Type: string;
+    Sequence: number;
+    IsPrimaryKey?: boolean;
+    AllowsNull?: boolean;
+    AllowUpdateAPI?: boolean;
+    IsVirtual?: boolean;
+    /** Field-level security rows (only read on an entity with EnableFieldLevelSecurity). */
+    EntityFieldPermissions?: Record<string, unknown>[];
+}
+
+function field(spec: FieldSpec): Record<string, unknown> {
+    return {
+        ID: `EF-${spec.EntityID}-${spec.Sequence}`,
+        EntityID: spec.EntityID,
+        Name: spec.Name,
+        Type: spec.Type,
+        Length: null,
+        IsPrimaryKey: spec.IsPrimaryKey ?? false,
+        IsSoftPrimaryKey: false,
+        IsSoftForeignKey: false,
+        AllowsNull: spec.AllowsNull ?? true,
+        AllowUpdateAPI: spec.AllowUpdateAPI ?? false,
+        DefaultValue: null,
+        AutoIncrement: false,
+        IsVirtual: spec.IsVirtual ?? false,
+        IsNameField: false,
+        ValueListType: 'None',
+        Sequence: spec.Sequence,
+        Status: 'Active',
+        EntityFieldValues: [],
+        EntityFieldPermissions: spec.EntityFieldPermissions ?? [],
+    };
+}
+
+/**
+ * One field-level permission row for the test role. On an FLS-enabled entity a field with NO rows
+ * is denied, so every non-key field of such an entity gets an explicit row.
+ */
+function fieldPermission(fieldName: string, access: { read?: string; update?: string; create?: string }): Record<string, unknown> {
+    const sequence: Record<string, number> = { Name: 2, MicrochipNumber: 3 }; // matches field()'s `EF-<entity>-<sequence>` ids
+    return {
+        ID: `fperm-${fieldName}`,
+        EntityFieldID: `EF-${ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID}-${sequence[fieldName]}`,
+        RoleID: ROLE_ID,
+        ReadAccess: access.read ?? FieldPermissionAccess.Allow,
+        UpdateAccess: access.update ?? FieldPermissionAccess.Allow,
+        CreateAccess: access.create ?? FieldPermissionAccess.Allow,
+    };
+}
+
+function permission(entityID: string): Record<string, unknown> {
+    return { ID: `perm-${entityID}`, EntityID: entityID, RoleID: ROLE_ID, CanCreate: true, CanRead: true, CanUpdate: true, CanDelete: true };
+}
+
+function entityData(overrides: {
+    ID: string; Name: string; BaseTable: string; ParentID: string | null; EntityFields: Record<string, unknown>[];
+    EnableFieldLevelSecurity?: boolean; AllowMultipleSubtypes?: boolean;
+}): Record<string, unknown> {
+    return {
+        ID: overrides.ID,
+        Name: overrides.Name,
+        BaseTable: overrides.BaseTable,
+        BaseView: `vw${overrides.BaseTable}s`,
+        SchemaName: 'Shelter',
+        VirtualEntity: false,
+        AllowCreateAPI: true,
+        AllowUpdateAPI: true,
+        AllowDeleteAPI: true,
+        IncludeInAPI: true,
+        AllowMultipleSubtypes: overrides.AllowMultipleSubtypes ?? false,
+        EnableFieldLevelSecurity: overrides.EnableFieldLevelSecurity ?? false,
+        ParentID: overrides.ParentID,
+        Status: 'Active',
+        EntityFields: overrides.EntityFields,
+        EntityPermissions: [permission(overrides.ID)],
+        EntityRelationships: [],
+        EntitySettings: [],
+    };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Fixture options. `nameLockedByFls`: Animals runs with field-level security ON and the test role
+ * may READ but neither UPDATE nor CREATE `Name` (every other field stays open). `overlapping`:
+ * Animals allows multiple subtypes.
+ */
+function buildEntities(options: { nameLockedByFls?: boolean; overlapping?: boolean } = {}): EntityInfo[] {
+    const fls = options.nameLockedByFls === true;
+    const animals = entityData({
+        ID: ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'Animals', BaseTable: 'Animal', ParentID: null,
+        EnableFieldLevelSecurity: fls,
+        AllowMultipleSubtypes: options.overlapping === true,
+        EntityFields: [
+            field({ EntityID: ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'ID', Type: 'uniqueidentifier', IsPrimaryKey: true, AllowsNull: false, Sequence: 1 }),
+            field({ EntityID: ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'Name', Type: 'nvarchar', AllowsNull: false, AllowUpdateAPI: true, Sequence: 2,
+                EntityFieldPermissions: fls ? [fieldPermission('Name', { update: FieldPermissionAccess.Deny, create: FieldPermissionAccess.Deny })] : [] }),
+            field({ EntityID: ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'MicrochipNumber', Type: 'nvarchar', AllowsNull: true, AllowUpdateAPI: true, Sequence: 3,
+                EntityFieldPermissions: fls ? [fieldPermission('MicrochipNumber', {})] : [] }),
+        ],
+    });
+    // Mirrors what CodeGen emits for an IS-A child: its OWN `ID` PK (shared with the parent), its
+    // own columns, and the parent's data fields as virtual, updatable mirrors.
+    const dogs = entityData({
+        ID: DOG_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'Dogs', BaseTable: 'Dog', ParentID: ANIMAL_ENTITY_ID,
+        EntityFields: [
+            field({ EntityID: DOG_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'ID', Type: 'uniqueidentifier', IsPrimaryKey: true, AllowsNull: false, Sequence: 1 }),
+            field({ EntityID: DOG_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'IsHouseTrained', Type: 'bit', AllowsNull: true, AllowUpdateAPI: true, Sequence: 2 }),
+            field({ EntityID: DOG_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'Name', Type: 'nvarchar', AllowsNull: false, AllowUpdateAPI: true, IsVirtual: true, Sequence: 3 }),
+            field({ EntityID: DOG_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'MicrochipNumber', Type: 'nvarchar', AllowsNull: true, AllowUpdateAPI: true, IsVirtual: true, Sequence: 4 }),
+        ],
+    });
+    const toys = entityData({
+        ID: TOY_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'Toys', BaseTable: 'Toy', ParentID: null,
+        EntityFields: [
+            field({ EntityID: TOY_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'ID', Type: 'uniqueidentifier', IsPrimaryKey: true, AllowsNull: false, Sequence: 1 }),
+            field({ EntityID: TOY_ENTITY_ID, Name: 'Name', Type: 'nvarchar', AllowsNull: false, AllowUpdateAPI: true, Sequence: 2 }),
+        ],
+    });
+    return [animals, dogs, toys].map(d => new EntityInfo(d));
+}
+
+function buildUser(): UserInfo {
+    return new UserInfo(null, {
+        ID: USER_ID, Name: 'Test User', Email: 'test.user@example.com',
+        FirstName: 'Test', LastName: 'User', IsActive: true,
+        UserRoles: [{ UserID: USER_ID, RoleID: ROLE_ID, RoleName: 'Admin' }],
+    });
+}
+
+// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+// Fake provider — real entity construction, an in-memory row store, a Save log
+// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/** Concrete BaseEntity (mirrors a generated entity class). */
+class TestEntity extends BaseEntity {}
+
+interface SaveRecord {
+    Entity: string;
+    Type: 'create' | 'update';
+    ID: unknown;
+    Values: Record<string, unknown>;
+    /** Fields field-level security told the provider to OMIT from an INSERT (CreateSuppressed). */
+    SuppressedOnCreate: string[];
+}
+
+class FakeIsaProvider {
+    public readonly Entities: EntityInfo[];
+    public readonly CurrentUser: UserInfo;
+    /** Rows the "database" holds, keyed by entity name then primary key. */
+    public rows: Record<string, Record<string, Record<string, unknown>>> = {};
+    /** Every Save the ORM handed us, in order — the observable the defect corrupts. */
+    public saves: SaveRecord[] = [];
+    /** Every Load the ORM asked for, in order. */
+    public loads: { Entity: string; ID: unknown }[] = [];
+
+    constructor(entities: EntityInfo[], user: UserInfo) {
+        this.Entities = entities;
+        this.CurrentUser = user;
+    }
+
+    public EntityByName(name: string): EntityInfo | undefined {
+        return this.Entities.find(e => e.Name.trim().toLowerCase() === name.trim().toLowerCase());
+    }
+
+    public EntityByID(id: string): EntityInfo | undefined {
+        return this.Entities.find(e => e.ID === id);
+    }
+
+    /** The same construction sequence as ProviderBase.GetEntityObject (minus the class factory). */
+    public async GetEntityObject(entityName: string, contextUser?: UserInfo): Promise<BaseEntity> {
+        const info = this.EntityByName(entityName);
+        if (!info) throw new Error(`Entity ${entityName} not found`);
+        const entity = new TestEntity(info, this as unknown as ConstructorParameters<typeof TestEntity>[1]);
+        await entity.Config(contextUser ?? this.CurrentUser);
+        await entity.InitializeParentEntity();
+        entity.NewRecord();
+        return entity;
+    }
+
+    public async Load(entity: BaseEntity, key: CompositeKey): Promise<Record<string, unknown> | null> {
+        const id = key.GetValueByFieldName('ID') as string;
+        this.loads.push({ Entity: entity.EntityInfo.Name, ID: id });
+        const row = this.rows[entity.EntityInfo.Name]?.[id];
+        return row ? { ...row } : null;
+    }
+
+    public async Save(entity: BaseEntity, _user: UserInfo, _options: EntitySaveOptions): Promise<Record<string, unknown>> {
+        this.saves.push({
+            Entity: entity.EntityInfo.Name,
+            Type: entity.IsSaved ? 'update' : 'create',
+            ID: entity.Get('ID'),
+            Values: entity.GetAll(),
+            SuppressedOnCreate: entity.Fields.filter(f => f.CreateSuppressed).map(f => f.Name),
+        });
+        return entity.GetAll();
+    }
+
+    public SetCachedRecordName(): void { /* cache is irrelevant here */ }
+    public GetCachedRecordName(): string | null { return null; }
+}
+
+/** Exposes the REAL protected CreateRecord; pub/sub wiring is out of scope for a unit test. */
+class CreateProbe extends ResolverBase {
+    public Create(entityName: string, input: Record<string, unknown>, provider: FakeIsaProvider, payload: UserPayload): Promise<Record<string, unknown> | null> {
+        return this.CreateRecord(
+            entityName,
+            input,
+            provider as unknown as DatabaseProviderBase,
+            payload,
+            undefined as unknown as PubSubEngine
+        ) as Promise<Record<string, unknown> | null>;
+    }
+    protected override ListenForEntityMessages(): void { /* no pub/sub in a unit test */ }
+}
+
+describe('ResolverBase.CreateRecord — IS-A promotion attaches the new child to the EXISTING parent', () => {
+    let provider: FakeIsaProvider;
+    let payload: UserPayload;
+    let previousGlobalProvider: IMetadataProvider;
+
+    /** (Re)build the fake provider over a fixture variant and publish it as the global provider. */
+    function useFixture(options: { nameLockedByFls?: boolean; overlapping?: boolean } = {}): void {
+        const user = buildUser();
+        provider = new FakeIsaProvider(buildEntities(options), user);
+        provider.rows = {
+            Animals: {
+                [EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID]: { ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID, Name: 'Biscuit', MicrochipNumber: '985112000000001' },
+            },
+            Dogs: {},
+        };
+        Metadata.Provider = provider as unknown as IMetadataProvider;
+        payload = { email: user.Email, userRecord: user, sessionId: 'test-session' };
+    }
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        // EntityInfo resolves ParentEntityInfo / ChildEntities through the GLOBAL provider (a
+        // stateless info-class proxy), and MapFieldNamesToCodeNames falls back to it too.
+        previousGlobalProvider = Metadata.Provider;
+        useFixture();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+        Metadata.Provider = previousGlobalProvider;
+    });
+
+    it('promotion: an existing parent key on a child create UPDATES nothing on the parent and INSERTs only the child', async () => {
+        const result = await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID, IsHouseTrained: true }, provider, payload);
+
+        // The parent row was looked up by the incoming key...
+        expect(provider.loads).toEqual([{ Entity: 'Animals', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }]);
+        // ...and NOT re-created. Before the fix this list began with
+        // { Entity: 'Animals', Type: 'create' } — a duplicate copy of Biscuit.
+        expect(provider.saves.filter(s => s.Entity === 'Animals')).toEqual([]);
+        // The child is created on the SHARED key.
+        expect(provider.saves).toEqual([
+            expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Dogs', Type: 'create', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+        ]);
+        expect(provider.saves[0].Values['IsHouseTrained']).toBe(true);
+        expect(result?.['ID']).toBe(EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID);
+    });
+
+    it('promotion: parent fields sent alongside the key are applied as an UPDATE of the existing parent', async () => {
+        await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID, Name: 'Biscuit II', IsHouseTrained: true }, provider, payload);
+
+        expect(provider.saves).toEqual([
+            expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Animals', Type: 'update', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+            expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Dogs', Type: 'create', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+        ]);
+        expect(provider.saves[0].Values['Name']).toBe('Biscuit II');
+        // The loaded value the input did NOT touch survives — the parent was loaded, not blanked.
+        expect(provider.saves[0].Values['MicrochipNumber']).toBe('985112000000001');
+    });
+
+    it('whole-chain create: no key in the input creates parent AND child on one fresh key, without a lookup', async () => {
+        await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { Name: 'Pretzel', IsHouseTrained: false }, provider, payload);
+
+        expect(provider.loads).toEqual([]);
+        expect(provider.saves.map(s => [s.Entity, s.Type])).toEqual([['Animals', 'create'], ['Dogs', 'create']]);
+        const sharedKey = provider.saves[0].ID;
+        expect(typeof sharedKey).toBe('string');
+        expect(sharedKey).not.toBe(EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID);
+        expect(provider.saves[1].ID).toBe(sharedKey);
+    });
+
+    it('whole-chain create with a caller-supplied key that matches no row still creates the full chain on that key', async () => {
+        await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { ID: MISSING_ANIMAL_ID, Name: 'Ghost', IsHouseTrained: false }, provider, payload);
+
+        expect(provider.loads).toEqual([{ Entity: 'Animals', ID: MISSING_ANIMAL_ID }]);
+        expect(provider.saves).toEqual([
+            expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Animals', Type: 'create', ID: MISSING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+            expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Dogs', Type: 'create', ID: MISSING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+        ]);
+        expect(provider.saves[0].Values['Name']).toBe('Ghost');
+    });
+
+    it('non-IS-A create is untouched: no lookup, one create', async () => {
+        await new CreateProbe().Create('Toys', { Name: 'Squeaky Bone' }, provider, payload);
+
+        expect(provider.loads).toEqual([]);
+        expect(provider.saves.map(s => [s.Entity, s.Type])).toEqual([['Toys', 'create']]);
+    });
+
+    it('overlapping subtypes (AllowMultipleSubtypes): promotion still attaches to the existing parent and creates only the child', async () => {
+        // Overlapping hierarchies exist precisely to be added to incrementally, so promotion is the
+        // natural operation there. The disjoint guard does not run; the attach path is the same.
+        useFixture({ overlapping: true });
+
+        const result = await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID, IsHouseTrained: true }, provider, payload);
+
+        expect(provider.loads).toEqual([{ Entity: 'Animals', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }]);
+        expect(provider.saves.filter(s => s.Entity === 'Animals')).toEqual([]);
+        expect(provider.saves).toEqual([
+            expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Dogs', Type: 'create', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+        ]);
+        expect(result?.['ID']).toBe(EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID);
+    });
+
+    describe('field-level security: the same parent field on a child create meets two different verbs', () => {
+        // With FLS on, parent fields sent on a child-create input are enforced by whichever verb the
+        // PARENT's save runs — and that is decided by whether the parent row already exists:
+        //   promotion  → the parent is LOADED, saves as an UPDATE → CheckFieldLevelUpdatePermissions REJECTS;
+        //   whole-chain create → the parent is NEW, saves as a CREATE → ApplyFieldLevelCreateSuppression OMITS.
+        // That fork is deliberate (a promotion really is an update of the parent) and these pin it.
+
+        it('promotion: a parent field the user cannot UPDATE rejects the whole save, before any SQL', async () => {
+            useFixture({ nameLockedByFls: true });
+
+            await expect(
+                new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID, Name: 'Biscuit II', IsHouseTrained: true }, provider, payload)
+            ).rejects.toThrow(/permission to update field 'Name'/);
+
+            expect(provider.loads).toEqual([{ Entity: 'Animals', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }]);
+            expect(provider.saves).toEqual([]);
+        });
+
+        it('promotion: parent fields the user CAN update still go through as an UPDATE', async () => {
+            useFixture({ nameLockedByFls: true });
+
+            await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID, MicrochipNumber: '985112000000002', IsHouseTrained: true }, provider, payload);
+
+            expect(provider.saves).toEqual([
+                expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Animals', Type: 'update', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+                expect.objectContaining({ Entity: 'Dogs', Type: 'create', ID: EXISTING_ANIMAL_ID }),
+            ]);
+            expect(provider.saves[0].Values['MicrochipNumber']).toBe('985112000000002');
+        });
+
+        it('whole-chain create: the same parent field the user cannot CREATE is silently OMITTED, and the create proceeds', async () => {
+            useFixture({ nameLockedByFls: true });
+
+            await new CreateProbe().Create('Dogs', { Name: 'Pretzel', MicrochipNumber: '985112000000003', IsHouseTrained: false }, provider, payload);
+
+            expect(provider.loads).toEqual([]);
+            expect(provider.saves.map(s => [s.Entity, s.Type])).toEqual([['Animals', 'create'], ['Dogs', 'create']]);
+            expect(provider.saves[0].SuppressedOnCreate).toEqual(['Name']);
+            expect(provider.saves[0].Values['MicrochipNumber']).toBe('985112000000003');
+        });
+    });
+});

package/src/__tests__/RunTemplateResolver.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+// type-graphql decorators call `Reflect.getMetadata`, which only exists once this polyfill is
+// loaded. MUST precede any import that pulls in the resolver file.
+import 'reflect-metadata';
+
+/**
+ * `RunTemplate` renders a stored template on demand. Its API-key scope check is a no-op for JWT,
+ * magic-link and widget sessions, so the resolver applies its own rule. These tests pin that it
+ * refuses scope-limited sessions and callers who cannot read templates before it loads anything.
+ */
+import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest';
+
+// As in RunDecisionResolver.test.ts: vitest's esbuild transform does not apply
+// `emitDecoratorMetadata`, so the decorators are no-ops and the resolver runs as a plain class.
+vi.mock('type-graphql', () => {
+  const noopDecorator = () => () => undefined;
+  return {
+    Resolver: noopDecorator, Mutation: noopDecorator, Query: noopDecorator, Subscription: noopDecorator,
+    ObjectType: noopDecorator, InputType: noopDecorator, Field: noopDecorator, Arg: noopDecorator,
+    Args: noopDecorator, Ctx: noopDecorator, PubSub: noopDecorator, Root: noopDecorator,
+    Directive: noopDecorator, Authorized: noopDecorator, UseMiddleware: noopDecorator,
+    createUnionType: () => class {},
+    AuthorizationError: class AuthorizationError extends Error {
+      constructor(message?: string) {
+        super(message);
+        this.name = 'AuthorizationError';
+      }
+    },
+    Float: class {}, Int: class {}, ID: class {},
+  };
+});
+
+import { EntityInfo, UserInfo, UserRoleInfo } from '@memberjunction/core';
+import { RunTemplateResolver } from '../resolvers/RunTemplateResolver.js';
+import type { AppContext, UserPayload } from '../types.js';
+
+const UI_ROLE_ID = '0b9b7b55-0000-4000-8000-0000000000a1';
+const TEMPLATE_ID = '0b9b7b55-0000-4000-8000-0000000000c1';
+
+/** An entity whose read permission is granted to the given roles. */
+function entityReadableBy(name: string, roleIds: string[]): EntityInfo {
+  const entityId = `entity-${name}`;
+  return new EntityInfo({
+    ID: entityId, Name: name, SchemaName: '__mj', BaseTable: name, BaseView: `vw${name}`, IncludeInAPI: true,
+    EntityPermissions: roleIds.map((roleId, index) => ({
+      ID: `${entityId}-permission-${index}`, EntityID: entityId, RoleID: roleId,
+      CanCreate: false, CanRead: true, CanUpdate: false, CanDelete: false, Type: 'Allow',
+    })),
+  });
+}
+
+/**
+ * Metadata plus the one data call the resolver makes first. The data call fails on purpose, so a
+ * test can tell whether the resolver got past authorization without needing a database.
+ */
+class FakeProvider {
+  public readonly EntityObjectRequests: string[] = [];
+
+  constructor(private readonly entities: EntityInfo[]) {}
+
+  public EntityByName(name: string): EntityInfo | undefined {
+    return this.entities.find((e) => e.Name.trim().toLowerCase() === name.trim().toLowerCase());
+  }
+
+  public async GetEntityObject(entityName: string): Promise<never> {
+    this.EntityObjectRequests.push(entityName);
+    throw new Error(`reached data access for ${entityName}`);
+  }
+}
+
+function makeUser(roleIds: string[]): UserInfo {
+  const userId = '0b9b7b55-0000-4000-8000-0000000000b1';
+  return new UserInfo(null, {
+    ID: userId, Name: 'Template Runner', Email: 'runner@example.com',
+    UserRoles: roleIds.map((roleId) => new UserRoleInfo({ UserID: userId, RoleID: roleId })),
+  });
+}
+
+const readableEverywhere = () => [
+  entityReadableBy('MJ: Templates', [UI_ROLE_ID]),
+  entityReadableBy('MJ: Template Contents', [UI_ROLE_ID]),
+];
+
+/** A JWT-style session (no API key), so the API-key scope check is a no-op. */
+function contextFor(user: UserInfo, provider: FakeProvider): AppContext {
+  const userPayload: UserPayload = { email: user.Email, userRecord: user, sessionId: 'session-1' };
+  return { userPayload, providers: [{ type: 'Read-Write', provider }] } as unknown as AppContext;
+}
+
+const runTemplate = (user: UserInfo, provider: FakeProvider) =>
+  new RunTemplateResolver().RunTemplate(TEMPLATE_ID, contextFor(user, provider));
+
+describe('RunTemplate authorization', () => {
+  it('refuses an anonymous magic-link guest before loading the template', async () => {
+    const provider = new FakeProvider(readableEverywhere());
+    const guest = makeUser([UI_ROLE_ID]);
+    guest.IsMagicLinkAnonymous = true;
+
+    const result = await runTemplate(guest, provider);
+
+    expect(result).toMatchObject({ success: false, error: 'Running templates is not permitted for scope-limited sessions' });
+    expect(provider.EntityObjectRequests).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('refuses a resource-scoped magic-link session before loading the template', async () => {
+    const provider = new FakeProvider(readableEverywhere());
+    const scoped = makeUser([UI_ROLE_ID]);
+    scoped.MagicLinkScope = { ResourceID: '0b9b7b55-0000-4000-8000-0000000000d1', ResourceType: 'Dashboards' };
+
+    const result = await runTemplate(scoped, provider);
+
+    expect(result).toMatchObject({ success: false, error: 'Running templates is not permitted for scope-limited sessions' });
+    expect(provider.EntityObjectRequests).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('refuses a user without read permission on MJ: Templates before loading the template', async () => {
+    const provider = new FakeProvider(readableEverywhere());
+
+    const result = await runTemplate(makeUser([]), provider);
+
+    expect(result).toMatchObject({ success: false, error: 'You do not have permission to read MJ: Templates' });
+    expect(provider.EntityObjectRequests).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('lets a user who can read templates and their content through to the template load', async () => {
+    const provider = new FakeProvider(readableEverywhere());
+
+    const result = await runTemplate(makeUser([UI_ROLE_ID]), provider);
+
+    expect(result).toMatchObject({ success: false, error: 'reached data access for MJ: Templates' });
+    expect(provider.EntityObjectRequests).toEqual(['MJ: Templates']);
+  });
+});