@maronn-openid-connect/cli 0.7.1 → 0.8.0

package/dist/frameworks/nextjs/device.js

@@ -0,0 +1,662 @@
+import { DEFAULT_FEATURES } from '../../features.js';
+import { EXPERIMENTAL_PACKAGE } from '../hono/templates.js';
+const DEVICE_PACKAGE = `${EXPERIMENTAL_PACKAGE}/device-authorization-grant`;
+export function nextJsDeviceAuthorizationConfigTemplate() {
+    return `/**
+ * EXPERIMENTAL — Device Authorization Grant settings (RFC 8628).
+ *
+ * Read by the device authorization endpoint and the verification UI (/device).
+ *
+ * - deviceCodeExpiresIn: §3.2 expires_in, in seconds. Keep it short: it is the
+ *   window in which a user_code can be guessed (§5.1) or phished (§5.4).
+ * - pollInterval: §3.2 interval, in seconds. The token endpoint raises a
+ *   record's own interval by 5 every time it answers slow_down.
+ * - maxLoginAttempts: failed device logins allowed per record before it is
+ *   denied. Per-record only — see device/login/route.ts.
+ *
+ * Not configurable: the user_code charset (RFC 8628 §6.1 base-20) and length
+ * (8). They carry the entropy claim, so they are constants in the experimental
+ * package rather than something a config typo can weaken.
+ */
+export const deviceAuthorizationConfig = {
+  deviceCodeExpiresIn: 600,
+  pollInterval: 5,
+  maxLoginAttempts: 5,
+};
+`;
+}
+export function nextJsDeviceAuthorizationRouteTemplate(corePkg, features = DEFAULT_FEATURES, scopes = []) {
+    const customScopesDeclared = scopes.length > 0;
+    const customScopeImport = customScopesDeclared
+        ? `
+import { findUnsupportedScopes } from '../_oidc-provider/scopes';`
+        : '';
+    const customScopeStep = customScopesDeclared
+        ? `
+    // RFC 6749 §3.3: reject a scope this OP never declared, the same way
+    // /authorize does. Checked after applyOfflineAccessPolicy so an
+    // offline_access the policy already dropped stays ignored rather than
+    // becoming invalid_scope (OIDC Core 1.0 §11).
+    const unsupportedScopes = findUnsupportedScopes(scope);
+    if (unsupportedScopes.length > 0) {
+      throw new DeviceAuthorizationError(
+        'invalid_scope',
+        'Unsupported scope: ' + unsupportedScopes.join(' '),
+      );
+    }
+`
+        : '';
+    return `/**
+ * EXPERIMENTAL — Device Authorization Endpoint (RFC 8628 §3.1 / §3.2).
+ *
+ * Generated because the OP was created with \`--enable device-authorization-grant\`.
+ * Backed by ${EXPERIMENTAL_PACKAGE}, whose API is NOT stable: it may change in a
+ * breaking way between releases. Do not build production code on it without
+ * pinning the version.
+ *
+ * The device (a TV app, a CLI, an IoT box) POSTs here — back channel,
+ * client-authenticated — and receives a device_code it polls the token endpoint
+ * with, plus a short user_code the End-User types into /device on another
+ * device's browser.
+ *
+ * NOTE (RFC 8628 §5.1): rate limiting the user_code guess surface is left to
+ * the deployment layer (reverse proxy / platform). An in-process counter cannot
+ * work across instances, so putting one here would give a false sense of
+ * protection. The in-band defenses are the 20^8 user_code entropy, the short
+ * TTL, and answering every failed match identically.
+ */
+import {
+  DeviceAuthorizationError,
+  applyOfflineAccessPolicy,
+  buildDeviceAuthorizationResponse,
+  createDeviceAuthorizationRecord,
+  validateDeviceAuthorizationScope,
+  validateDeviceGrantAllowed,
+} from '${DEVICE_PACKAGE}';
+import {
+  TokenError,
+  extractClientCredentials,
+  resolveAuthenticatedTokenClient,
+  sanitizeErrorDescription,
+  validateClientAuthMethod,
+  verifyClientSecret,
+} from '${corePkg}';
+import { clientResolver, config, deviceAuthorizationStore } from '../_oidc-provider/provider';
+import {
+  clientCors,
+  corsPreflight,
+  isFormUrlEncoded,
+  noStoreJson,
+  oauthError,
+  uniqueParams,
+  withCors,
+} from '../_oidc-provider/http';${customScopeImport}
+import { deviceAuthorizationConfig } from './config';
+
+export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic';
+export const runtime = 'nodejs';
+
+export async function POST(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
+  return withCors(request, clientCors, await deviceAuthorization(request));
+}
+
+export function OPTIONS(request: Request): Response {
+  return corsPreflight(request, clientCors);
+}
+
+/**
+ * device_code is a credential, so every answer follows the token response rules
+ * of RFC 6749 §5.1 / §5.2 (no-store), although RFC 8628 §3.2 has no explicit rule.
+ */
+async function deviceAuthorization(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
+  // RFC 8628 §3.1: the body MUST be application/x-www-form-urlencoded.
+  if (!isFormUrlEncoded(request)) {
+    return oauthError('invalid_request', 'Device authorization requests must use application/x-www-form-urlencoded');
+  }
+
+  // RFC 6749 §3.1: request parameters MUST NOT be repeated.
+  const { params, duplicateKey } = uniqueParams(new URLSearchParams(await request.text()));
+  if (duplicateKey !== undefined) {
+    return oauthError('invalid_request', \`Parameter "\${sanitizeErrorDescription(duplicateKey)}" must not be repeated\`);
+  }
+
+  try {
+    // --- Client authentication pipeline -------------------------------------
+    // RFC 8628 §3.1: "The client authentication requirements of Section 3.2.1 of
+    // [RFC6749] apply" — the same pipeline the token endpoint runs. Public
+    // clients present only client_id.
+    const presentedCredentials = extractClientCredentials({
+      params,
+      authorizationHeader: request.headers.get('Authorization') ?? '',
+    });
+    const client = await resolveAuthenticatedTokenClient(
+      presentedCredentials.clientId,
+      clientResolver,
+    );
+    validateClientAuthMethod(client, presentedCredentials);
+    await verifyClientSecret(client, presentedCredentials.clientSecret);
+
+    // --- Device authorization pipeline --------------------------------------
+    // Each step below is an independent function from
+    // ${DEVICE_PACKAGE}, called in RFC 8628 §3.1 order. Delete a call to drop
+    // that validation, or insert your own logic between steps.
+
+    // RFC 6749 §5.2: the client must be registered for the device_code grant.
+    validateDeviceGrantAllowed(client);
+
+    // RFC 8628 §3.1 leaves scope OPTIONAL, but this OP requires scope and openid
+    // everywhere (the same rule as /authorize), so a request without scope is
+    // rejected: a known, deliberate profile restriction.
+    const requestedScope = validateDeviceAuthorizationScope(params['scope']);
+
+    // OIDC Core 1.0 §11: drop offline_access when it could never be granted.
+    const scope = applyOfflineAccessPolicy(requestedScope, {
+      client,
+      refreshTokenFeatureEnabled: ${features.refreshToken ? 'true' : 'false'},
+    });
+${customScopeStep}
+    // RFC 8628 §3.2 / §5.2: mint a 256-bit device_code and a collision-checked
+    // base-20 user_code, then store the pending record under both.
+    const record = await createDeviceAuthorizationRecord({
+      clientId: client.clientId,
+      scope,
+      store: deviceAuthorizationStore,
+      expiresIn: deviceAuthorizationConfig.deviceCodeExpiresIn,
+      interval: deviceAuthorizationConfig.pollInterval,
+    });
+
+    // Never log device_code or user_code: both are live credentials for the
+    // lifetime of the record (RFC 8628 §5.1 / §5.2).
+
+    return noStoreJson(buildDeviceAuthorizationResponse(record, config.issuer));
+  } catch (error) {
+    if (error instanceof DeviceAuthorizationError) {
+      // RFC 6749 §5.2 shape. Authentication failures are core TokenErrors (401).
+      return oauthError(error.code, error.errorDescription, error.statusCode);
+    }
+    if (error instanceof TokenError) {
+      return oauthError(
+        error.error,
+        error.errorDescription,
+        error.statusCode,
+        error.wwwAuthenticate ? { 'WWW-Authenticate': error.wwwAuthenticate } : undefined,
+      );
+    }
+    return oauthError('server_error', undefined, 500);
+  }
+}
+`;
+}
+export function nextJsDeviceScreensTemplate() {
+    return `/**
+ * EXPERIMENTAL — the screens of the device verification UI (RFC 8628 §3.3).
+ *
+ * Restyle the UI here. Keep the form actions, field names and decision values:
+ * the Route Handlers next to this file read exactly those.
+ */
+import {
+  DeviceAuthorizationError,
+  DeviceVerificationError,
+  INVALID_USER_CODE_MESSAGE,
+} from '${DEVICE_PACKAGE}';
+import { errorPage, escapeHtml, htmlResponse } from '../_oidc-provider/html';
+
+/** The user_code entry form. userCode is untrusted input (query or a previous submission). */
+export function verificationScreen(userCode: string, error?: string): Response {
+  const errorHtml = error ? \`<p style="color: red;">\${escapeHtml(error)}</p>\` : '';
+  return htmlResponse(
+    \`<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head><title>Device Activation</title></head>
+<body>
+  <h1>Device Activation</h1>
+  <p>Enter the code shown on your device.</p>
+  \${errorHtml}
+  <form method="POST" action="/device">
+    <div>
+      <label for="user_code">Code:</label>
+      <input type="text" id="user_code" name="user_code" value="\${escapeHtml(userCode)}" required />
+    </div>
+    <button type="submit">Continue</button>
+  </form>
+</body>
+</html>\`,
+    { status: error ? 400 : 200 },
+  );
+}
+
+/**
+ * The code entry form again, with the one reason-free failure message. RFC 8628
+ * §5.1: unknown, expired and already-used codes must be indistinguishable, or
+ * the response itself confirms which codes exist.
+ */
+export function invalidUserCodeScreen(userCode: string): Response {
+  return verificationScreen(userCode, INVALID_USER_CODE_MESSAGE);
+}
+
+/** The sign-in form of the device flow; cookies carry the browser binding. */
+export function loginScreen(
+  params: { userCode: string; csrfToken: string; error?: string; remainingAttempts?: number },
+  cookies: readonly string[] = [],
+): Response {
+  const errorHtml = params.error
+    ? \`<p style="color: red;">\${escapeHtml(params.error)}\${
+        params.remainingAttempts !== undefined
+          ? \`. Attempts remaining: \${params.remainingAttempts}\`
+          : ''
+      }</p>\`
+    : '';
+  return htmlResponse(
+    \`<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head><title>Login</title></head>
+<body>
+  <h1>Login</h1>
+  <p>Activating device code <strong>\${escapeHtml(params.userCode)}</strong></p>
+  \${errorHtml}
+  <form method="POST" action="/device/login">
+    <input type="hidden" name="user_code" value="\${escapeHtml(params.userCode)}" />
+    <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="\${escapeHtml(params.csrfToken)}" />
+    <div>
+      <label for="username">Username:</label>
+      <input type="text" id="username" name="username" required />
+    </div>
+    <div>
+      <label for="password">Password:</label>
+      <input type="password" id="password" name="password" required />
+    </div>
+    <button type="submit">Login</button>
+  </form>
+</body>
+</html>\`,
+    { cookies },
+  );
+}
+
+/**
+ * The approve / deny screen. RFC 8628 §5.4: the user_code is repeated so the
+ * End-User can check it against the device in front of them — the only defense
+ * against being lured into approving someone else's device.
+ */
+export function approvalScreen(
+  params: { userCode: string; csrfToken: string; clientId: string; scopes: readonly string[] },
+  cookies: readonly string[] = [],
+): Response {
+  const scopeListHtml = params.scopes.map((scope) => \`    <li>\${escapeHtml(scope)}</li>\`).join('\\n');
+  return htmlResponse(
+    \`<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head><title>Authorize Device</title></head>
+<body>
+  <h1>Authorize Device</h1>
+  <p>Confirm that your device is showing this code: <strong>\${escapeHtml(params.userCode)}</strong></p>
+  <p>Do not continue if the code does not match.</p>
+  <p>Client <strong>\${escapeHtml(params.clientId)}</strong> is requesting access to the following scopes:</p>
+  <ul>
+\${scopeListHtml}
+  </ul>
+  <form method="POST" action="/device/approve">
+    <input type="hidden" name="user_code" value="\${escapeHtml(params.userCode)}" />
+    <input type="hidden" name="csrf_token" value="\${escapeHtml(params.csrfToken)}" />
+    <button type="submit" name="decision" value="approve">Approve</button>
+    <button type="submit" name="decision" value="deny">Deny</button>
+  </form>
+</body>
+</html>\`,
+    { cookies },
+  );
+}
+
+/** The "go back to your device" screen. */
+export function completedScreen(
+  params: { approved: boolean; clientId: string },
+  cookies: readonly string[] = [],
+): Response {
+  const outcome = params.approved
+    ? \`<p>You approved <strong>\${escapeHtml(params.clientId)}</strong>.</p>\`
+    : \`<p>You denied <strong>\${escapeHtml(params.clientId)}</strong>.</p>\`;
+  return htmlResponse(
+    \`<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+<head><title>Device Activation</title></head>
+<body>
+  <h1>Device Activation</h1>
+\${outcome}
+  <p>You can close this page and go back to your device.</p>
+</body>
+</html>\`,
+    { cookies },
+  );
+}
+
+/**
+ * A failed binding or CSRF check, shown on the OP's error page with its status
+ * (403 for a missing binding). Anything that is not a verification failure is
+ * rethrown.
+ */
+export function verificationFailureScreen(error: unknown): Response {
+  if (error instanceof DeviceVerificationError) {
+    return errorPage(error.message, error.statusCode);
+  }
+  if (error instanceof DeviceAuthorizationError) {
+    return errorPage(error.errorDescription, 400);
+  }
+  throw error;
+}
+`;
+}
+export function nextJsDeviceRouteTemplate(scopes = []) {
+    const customScopesDeclared = scopes.length > 0;
+    const customScopeImport = customScopesDeclared
+        ? `
+import { resolveGrantableScopes } from '../_oidc-provider/scopes';`
+        : '';
+    const approvalScopes = customScopesDeclared
+        ? 'await resolveGrantableScopes(record.scope, session.subject)'
+        : 'record.scope';
+    return `/**
+ * EXPERIMENTAL — device verification UI, step 1 (RFC 8628 §3.3).
+ *
+ * The End-User opens /device on a second device and types the user_code the
+ * first device shows. On a match this step binds the verification to this
+ * browser: the user_code is known to whoever started the flow — possibly an
+ * attacker — so a CSRF token on the record alone would be no defense. The
+ * binding cookie minted here is what every later step requires (see
+ * buildDeviceBindingCookie() in store.ts for the full model).
+ *
+ * Backed by ${EXPERIMENTAL_PACKAGE}, whose API is NOT stable.
+ */
+import type { NextRequest } from 'next/server';
+import {
+  findPendingRecordByUserCode,
+  issueVerificationBinding,
+  type DeviceAuthorizationRecord,
+} from '${DEVICE_PACKAGE}';
+import { deviceAuthorizationStore, stores } from '../_oidc-provider/provider';
+import { buildDeviceBindingCookie, parseSessionId } from '../_oidc-provider/store';
+import { readFormFields } from '../_oidc-provider/http';${customScopeImport}
+import {
+  approvalScreen,
+  invalidUserCodeScreen,
+  loginScreen,
+  verificationScreen,
+} from './screens';
+
+export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic';
+export const runtime = 'nodejs';
+
+/**
+ * The user_code entry form (RFC 8628 §3.3 / §3.3.1). Unauthenticated and free
+ * of side effects: a user_code in the query (verification_uri_complete) only
+ * pre-fills the field, so following the complete URI consumes or reveals
+ * nothing.
+ */
+export function GET(request: NextRequest): Response {
+  return verificationScreen(request.nextUrl.searchParams.get('user_code') ?? '');
+}
+
+/** User code submission: on a match, the sign-in form or — signed in already — the approval screen. */
+export async function POST(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
+  const form = await readFormFields(request);
+  const submittedUserCode = String(form.get('user_code') ?? '');
+
+  const record = await findPendingRecordByUserCode(submittedUserCode, deviceAuthorizationStore);
+  if (!record) {
+    return invalidUserCodeScreen(submittedUserCode);
+  }
+
+  // Rotate the binding secret and the csrf token together. A second browser
+  // submitting the same user_code takes the binding over (last writer wins);
+  // that is inherent to a flow whose identifier is shareable by design.
+  const { bindingSecret, csrfToken } = await issueVerificationBinding(
+    record,
+    deviceAuthorizationStore,
+  );
+  const bindingCookie = buildDeviceBindingCookie(
+    record.userCode,
+    bindingSecret,
+    remainingTtlSeconds(record),
+  );
+
+  const sessionId = parseSessionId(request.headers.get('Cookie'));
+  const session = sessionId ? await stores.browserSessionStore.get(sessionId) : undefined;
+  if (session) {
+    return approvalScreen(
+      {
+        userCode: record.userCodeDisplay,
+        csrfToken,
+        clientId: record.clientId,
+        scopes: ${approvalScopes},
+      },
+      [bindingCookie],
+    );
+  }
+  return loginScreen({ userCode: record.userCodeDisplay, csrfToken }, [bindingCookie]);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Remaining lifetime of a record in whole seconds, rounded up so the binding
+ * cookie always outlives the record it binds (a cookie that expired first
+ * would turn a still-valid verification into an unexplained 403).
+ */
+function remainingTtlSeconds(record: DeviceAuthorizationRecord): number {
+  return Math.max(0, Math.ceil((record.expiresAt.getTime() - Date.now()) / 1000));
+}
+`;
+}
+export function nextJsDeviceLoginRouteTemplate(corePkg, scopes = []) {
+    const customScopesDeclared = scopes.length > 0;
+    const customScopeImport = customScopesDeclared
+        ? `
+import { resolveGrantableScopes } from '../../_oidc-provider/scopes';`
+        : '';
+    const approvalScopes = customScopesDeclared
+        ? 'await resolveGrantableScopes(record.scope, user.sub)'
+        : 'record.scope';
+    return `/**
+ * EXPERIMENTAL — device verification UI, step 2: sign in (RFC 8628 §3.3).
+ *
+ * Binding first, then CSRF, then credentials: the binding proves this is the
+ * browser that submitted the user_code, and it must gate the step that would
+ * otherwise let a forged POST plant an OP session in the victim's browser
+ * (login CSRF).
+ *
+ * Backed by ${EXPERIMENTAL_PACKAGE}, whose API is NOT stable.
+ */
+import {
+  findPendingRecordByUserCode,
+  recordDeviceLoginFailure,
+  validateVerificationBinding,
+  validateVerificationCsrfToken,
+} from '${DEVICE_PACKAGE}';
+import { generateRandomString } from '${corePkg}';
+import { errorPage } from '../../_oidc-provider/html';
+import { readFormFields } from '../../_oidc-provider/http';
+import { deviceAuthorizationStore, stores } from '../../_oidc-provider/provider';
+import { buildSessionCookie, parseDeviceBindingSecret } from '../../_oidc-provider/store';${customScopeImport}
+import { deviceAuthorizationConfig } from '../../device_authorization/config';
+import {
+  approvalScreen,
+  invalidUserCodeScreen,
+  loginScreen,
+  verificationFailureScreen,
+} from '../screens';
+
+export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic';
+export const runtime = 'nodejs';
+
+export async function POST(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
+  const form = await readFormFields(request);
+  const submittedUserCode = String(form.get('user_code') ?? '');
+  const csrfToken = String(form.get('csrf_token') ?? '');
+
+  const record = await findPendingRecordByUserCode(submittedUserCode, deviceAuthorizationStore);
+  if (!record) {
+    return invalidUserCodeScreen(submittedUserCode);
+  }
+
+  try {
+    await validateVerificationBinding(
+      record,
+      parseDeviceBindingSecret(request.headers.get('Cookie'), record.userCode),
+    );
+    validateVerificationCsrfToken(record, csrfToken);
+  } catch (error) {
+    return verificationFailureScreen(error);
+  }
+
+  // Swap point: replace this with your own credential check (LDAP, WebAuthn, an
+  // upstream IdP) without touching anything above or below it.
+  const user = await stores.userStore.authenticate(
+    String(form.get('username') ?? ''),
+    String(form.get('password') ?? ''),
+  );
+  if (!user) {
+    // Per-record throttling only. An attacker holding a device-grant client can
+    // mint unlimited records, so the aggregate password-guess budget is the same
+    // as the one on /login. Subject-scoped throttling is a separate concern.
+    const failure = await recordDeviceLoginFailure(
+      record,
+      deviceAuthorizationStore,
+      deviceAuthorizationConfig.maxLoginAttempts,
+    );
+    if (!failure.canRetry) {
+      // The record is now denied: the device gets access_denied on its next poll.
+      return errorPage('Too many login attempts', 429);
+    }
+    return loginScreen({
+      userCode: record.userCodeDisplay,
+      csrfToken,
+      error: 'Invalid credentials',
+      remainingAttempts: failure.remainingAttempts,
+    });
+  }
+
+  const sessionId = generateRandomString(32);
+  await stores.browserSessionStore.set(sessionId, {
+    subject: user.sub,
+    authTime: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000),
+  });
+
+  // The new OP session travels with the approval screen; the approval step has
+  // to present the binding cookie again as well.
+  return approvalScreen(
+    {
+      userCode: record.userCodeDisplay,
+      csrfToken,
+      clientId: record.clientId,
+      scopes: ${approvalScopes},
+    },
+    [buildSessionCookie(sessionId)],
+  );
+}
+`;
+}
+export function nextJsDeviceApproveRouteTemplate(scopes = []) {
+    const customScopesDeclared = scopes.length > 0;
+    const customScopeImport = customScopesDeclared
+        ? `
+import { resolveGrantableScopes } from '../../_oidc-provider/scopes';`
+        : '';
+    const approveNarrowStep = customScopesDeclared
+        ? `
+      // Apply the scope policy to what was approved. approveDeviceAuthorization()
+      // copies the requested scope into approvedScope, so the policy is applied
+      // afterwards and persisted; the token endpoint reads approvedScope, and
+      // RFC 6749 §3.3 allows a granted scope narrower than the request. Write the
+      // policy in resolveGrantableScopes() (scopes.ts).
+      approved.approvedScope = await resolveGrantableScopes(
+        approved.approvedScope ?? approved.scope,
+        session.subject,
+      );
+      await deviceAuthorizationStore.update(approved);
+`
+        : '';
+    return `/**
+ * EXPERIMENTAL — device verification UI, step 3: approve or deny
+ * (RFC 8628 §3.3).
+ *
+ * The only state-changing step of the UI, so it demands all three: an OP
+ * session, the binding cookie, and the csrf_token. The device learns the
+ * outcome by polling the token endpoint.
+ *
+ * Backed by ${EXPERIMENTAL_PACKAGE}, whose API is NOT stable.
+ */
+import {
+  approveDeviceAuthorization,
+  denyDeviceAuthorization,
+  findPendingRecordByUserCode,
+  validateVerificationBinding,
+} from '${DEVICE_PACKAGE}';
+import { errorPage } from '../../_oidc-provider/html';
+import { readFormFields } from '../../_oidc-provider/http';
+import { deviceAuthorizationStore, resolvers, stores } from '../../_oidc-provider/provider';
+import {
+  buildClearedDeviceBindingCookie,
+  parseDeviceBindingSecret,
+  parseSessionId,
+} from '../../_oidc-provider/store';${customScopeImport}
+import { completedScreen, invalidUserCodeScreen, verificationFailureScreen } from '../screens';
+
+export const dynamic = 'force-dynamic';
+export const runtime = 'nodejs';
+
+export async function POST(request: Request): Promise<Response> {
+  const form = await readFormFields(request);
+  const submittedUserCode = String(form.get('user_code') ?? '');
+  const csrfToken = String(form.get('csrf_token') ?? '');
+
+  const record = await findPendingRecordByUserCode(submittedUserCode, deviceAuthorizationStore);
+  if (!record) {
+    return invalidUserCodeScreen(submittedUserCode);
+  }
+
+  const sessionId = parseSessionId(request.headers.get('Cookie'));
+  const session = sessionId ? await stores.browserSessionStore.get(sessionId) : undefined;
+  if (!session) {
+    return errorPage('Sign in again to approve this device', 401);
+  }
+
+  // The decision ends the verification; drop its binding cookie.
+  const clearBindingCookie = buildClearedDeviceBindingCookie(record.userCode);
+  try {
+    await validateVerificationBinding(
+      record,
+      parseDeviceBindingSecret(request.headers.get('Cookie'), record.userCode),
+    );
+
+    if (String(form.get('decision') ?? '') === 'approve') {
+      // csrf_token is validated inside; the record moves to approved with the
+      // subject, auth_time, scope and a fresh grantId the token endpoint reads.
+      const approved = await approveDeviceAuthorization({
+        record,
+        store: deviceAuthorizationStore,
+        csrfToken,
+        subject: session.subject,
+        authTime: session.authTime,
+      });
+${approveNarrowStep}
+      // Record the consent the way /consent does, so a later Authorization Code
+      // Flow for this client skips the consent screen (OIDC Core 1.0 §3.1.2.4),
+      // and the grant, so withdrawing that consent revokes these tokens too.
+      await resolvers.consentResolver.recordConsent?.(
+        session.subject,
+        approved.clientId,
+        approved.approvedScope ?? approved.scope,
+      );
+      if (approved.grantId) {
+        await resolvers.consentResolver.recordGrant(session.subject, approved.clientId, approved.grantId);
+      }
+      return completedScreen({ approved: true, clientId: approved.clientId }, [clearBindingCookie]);
+    }
+
+    // Anything but 'approve' denies.
+    await denyDeviceAuthorization({ record, store: deviceAuthorizationStore, csrfToken });
+    return completedScreen({ approved: false, clientId: record.clientId }, [clearBindingCookie]);
+  } catch (error) {
+    return verificationFailureScreen(error);
+  }
+}
+`;
+}
+//# sourceMappingURL=device.js.map

package/dist/frameworks/nextjs/device.js.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"device.js","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/frameworks/nextjs/device.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAKA,OAAO,EAAE,gBAAgB,EAAE,MAAM,mBAAmB,CAAC;AAErD,OAAO,EAAE,oBAAoB,EAAE,MAAM,sBAAsB,CAAC;AAE5D,MAAM,cAAc,GAAG,GAAG,oBAAoB,6BAA6B,CAAC;AAG5E,MAAM,UAAU,uCAAuC;IACrD,OAAO;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CAqBR,CAAC;AACF,CAAC;AAGD,MAAM,UAAU,sCAAsC,CACpD,OAAe,EACf,QAAQ,GAAsB,gBAAgB,EAC9C,MAAM,GAAa,EAAE;IAErB,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/C,MAAM,iBAAiB,GAAG,oBAAoB;QAC5C,CAAC,CAAC;kEAC4D;QAC9D,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACP,MAAM,eAAe,GAAG,oBAAoB;QAC1C,CAAC,CAAC;;;;;;;;;;;;CAYL;QACG,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACP,OAAO;;;;eAIM,oBAAoB;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;UAsBzB,cAAc;;;;;;;;UAQd,OAAO;;;;;;;;;;kCAUiB,iBAAiB;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;SAgD1C,cAAc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;oCAca,QAAQ,CAAC,YAAY,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,MAAM,CAAC,CAAC,CAAC,OAAO;;EAE1E,eAAe;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CA+BhB,CAAC;AACF,CAAC;AAGD,MAAM,UAAU,2BAA2B;IACzC,OAAO;;;;;;;;;;UAUC,cAAc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CAiJvB,CAAC;AACF,CAAC;AAGD,MAAM,UAAU,yBAAyB,CAAC,MAAM,GAAa,EAAE;IAC7D,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/C,MAAM,iBAAiB,GAAG,oBAAoB;QAC5C,CAAC,CAAC;mEAC6D;QAC/D,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACP,MAAM,cAAc,GAAG,oBAAoB;QACzC,CAAC,CAAC,6DAA6D;QAC/D,CAAC,CAAC,cAAc,CAAC;IACnB,OAAO;;;;;;;;;;eAUM,oBAAoB;;;;;;;UAOzB,cAAc;;;0DAGkC,iBAAiB;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;kBAoDzD,cAAc;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CAgB/B,CAAC;AACF,CAAC;AAGD,MAAM,UAAU,8BAA8B,CAAC,OAAe,EAAE,MAAM,GAAa,EAAE;IACnF,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/C,MAAM,iBAAiB,GAAG,oBAAoB;QAC5C,CAAC,CAAC;sEACgE;QAClE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACP,MAAM,cAAc,GAAG,oBAAoB;QACzC,CAAC,CAAC,sDAAsD;QACxD,CAAC,CAAC,cAAc,CAAC;IACnB,OAAO;;;;;;;;eAQM,oBAAoB;;;;;;;UAOzB,cAAc;wCACgB,OAAO;;;;4FAI6C,iBAAiB;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;gBAwE7F,cAAc;;;;;CAK7B,CAAC;AACF,CAAC;AAGD,MAAM,UAAU,gCAAgC,CAAC,MAAM,GAAa,EAAE;IACpE,MAAM,oBAAoB,GAAG,MAAM,CAAC,MAAM,GAAG,CAAC,CAAC;IAC/C,MAAM,iBAAiB,GAAG,oBAAoB;QAC5C,CAAC,CAAC;sEACgE;QAClE,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACP,MAAM,iBAAiB,GAAG,oBAAoB;QAC5C,CAAC,CAAC;;;;;;;;;;;CAWL;QACG,CAAC,CAAC,EAAE,CAAC;IACP,OAAO;;;;;;;;eAQM,oBAAoB;;;;;;;UAOzB,cAAc;;;;;;;;sCAQc,iBAAiB;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;EAwCrD,iBAAiB;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;CAsBlB,CAAC;AACF,CAAC"}

package/dist/frameworks/nextjs/endpoints.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+import type { OidcFeatureConfig } from '../../features.js';
+export declare function nextJsUserinfoRouteTemplate(corePkg: string): string;
+export declare function nextJsIntrospectionRouteTemplate(corePkg: string, features?: OidcFeatureConfig): string;
+export declare function nextJsRevocationRouteTemplate(corePkg: string): string;
+export declare function nextJsParConfigTemplate(): string;
+export declare function nextJsParRouteTemplate(corePkg: string): string;
+//# sourceMappingURL=endpoints.d.ts.map

package/dist/frameworks/nextjs/endpoints.d.ts.map

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"version":3,"file":"endpoints.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../../src/frameworks/nextjs/endpoints.ts"],"names":[],"mappings":"AAMA,OAAO,KAAK,EAAE,iBAAiB,EAAE,MAAM,mBAAmB,CAAC;AAI3D,wBAAgB,2BAA2B,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,CA0MnE;AAGD,wBAAgB,gCAAgC,CAC9C,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,EACf,QAAQ,GAAE,iBAAoC,GAC7C,MAAM,CA+LR;AAGD,wBAAgB,6BAA6B,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,CAwHrE;AAGD,wBAAgB,uBAAuB,IAAI,MAAM,CAsBhD;AAGD,wBAAgB,sBAAsB,CAAC,OAAO,EAAE,MAAM,GAAG,MAAM,CAkI9D"}