@kernhq/module-hr 0.16.0 → 0.17.1

package/dist/server/services/privacy.js

@@ -0,0 +1,972 @@
+import { KernError } from '@kernhq/kernel';
+import { and, asc, count, desc, eq, inArray, isNotNull, isNull, lt, ne, or, sql } from 'drizzle-orm';
+import { approvalDecisions, approvalRequests, approvalSteps, attendanceDays, delegations, employments, leaveLedger, leaveRequestDays, leaveRequests, leaveTypes, officeAssignments, offices, orgUnits, people, peopleSensitive, personDocuments, personHistory, punches, regularizations, retentionSettings, sensitiveAccessLog, } from '../schema.js';
+import { todayIso } from './db.js';
+/**
+ * Subject access, erasure and retention.
+ *
+ * The whole file rests on one decision, and the rest follows from it: **erasure here is redaction,
+ * never deletion.** Three of this module's tables say why in their own comments — the ledger is
+ * append-only because a balance is the sum of it and nothing else, punches are append-only because
+ * an attendance record somebody can quietly rewrite is worth nothing in the dispute it exists for,
+ * and `employments` is effective-dated so that March is still answerable in June. Deleting an erased
+ * person's rows breaks all three at once, and answers a payroll audit with "she left, so we deleted
+ * her file". So every step below clears columns and leaves rows, and the report says which rows
+ * survived and on what basis.
+ *
+ * Two properties are load-bearing and both come out of how the predicates are written:
+ *
+ * - **Replayable.** Every step matches only rows that still have something to clear, so a second run
+ *   updates nothing and reports zero. A half-finished erasure is therefore finished by running it
+ *   again, which matters because the only alternative to a resumable erasure is a refused one.
+ * - **Previewable.** A step is a predicate plus a `set`; the dry run counts the predicate and the
+ *   real run counts it and then applies the set. The preview cannot drift from the thing it previews
+ *   because there is only one predicate, in one place — the same reason `accrual.preview` runs the
+ *   code the run runs.
+ */
+// =====================================================================================
+// pure helpers — the redaction rules, testable without a database
+// =====================================================================================
+/**
+ * The pseudonym an erased person is shown under.
+ *
+ * `display_name` is `not null` and the contract's `Person.displayName` is `min(1)`, so there is no
+ * "no name" to write: something has to go in the column and it must not be a name. The employee
+ * number is the right thing when there is one — it is already a pseudonym, it is the join key a
+ * payslip carries, and it survives erasure for exactly that reason. Otherwise the front of the row's
+ * own uuid, which identifies the record without identifying the person.
+ *
+ * Not a localised label like "Erased employee": the database is not the place for a language, and a
+ * client that knows the row is a tombstone can render one. Knowing that needs `erasedAt` on the
+ * `Person` contract, which is a change to `models.ts`, `toPerson` and the client mock together.
+ */
+export const erasureDisplayName = (person) => person.employeeNo?.trim() || `person-${person.id.slice(0, 8)}`;
+/**
+ * `person_history` fields whose recorded values are personal data.
+ *
+ * The trap this list exists for: `person_history` stores `from_value`/`to_value` as jsonb for every
+ * field, so a redacted `people` row sits beside a history row saying `personalEmail: null → "…"`.
+ * Redacting the record and leaving the trail is theatre.
+ *
+ * What is *not* here is as deliberate. `hiredOn`, `terminatedOn`, `status` and every employment
+ * field stay with their values, because those are the employment facts the erasure keeps on `people`
+ * and `employments` anyway — clearing their history while keeping the current value would leave the
+ * record self-contradictory for no gain. And `sensitive` rows already store only key names, never
+ * values (`sensitive.update` has always written it that way), so there is nothing in them to clear.
+ */
+export const REDACTED_HISTORY_FIELDS = [
+    'displayName',
+    'workEmail',
+    'personalEmail',
+    'phone',
+    'photoFileId',
+    'timezone',
+    'custom',
+];
+/** `custom.dietary` is as personal as `custom` itself; the writer records either spelling. */
+export const isRedactableHistoryField = (field) => REDACTED_HISTORY_FIELDS.includes(field) || field.startsWith('custom.');
+/**
+ * Replace every occurrence of a person's name inside a JSON value.
+ *
+ * `approval_requests.chain` is a snapshot of the workflow as it stood when the request was raised,
+ * and a step in it can be named after the person it is about. Nulling the column is not an option —
+ * it is `not null` and it is the record of who had to sign — so the names come out and the structure
+ * stays.
+ *
+ * Substring rather than equality: a step called "Approval for Ayşe Demir" carries the name as much
+ * as one called "Ayşe Demir" does. Case-insensitive, and needles shorter than three characters are
+ * ignored, because a one-letter name would blank every string in the document.
+ *
+ * Reports whether anything changed, so the caller can skip the write — which is what makes an
+ * erasure replay report zero rows for this class rather than rewriting identical jsonb.
+ */
+export function scrubNames(value, needles, token) {
+    const usable = needles.map((n) => n.trim()).filter((n) => n.length >= 3);
+    if (!usable.length)
+        return { value, changed: false };
+    let changed = false;
+    const walk = (node) => {
+        if (typeof node === 'string') {
+            let out = node;
+            for (const needle of usable) {
+                // Escape the needle: a name is user input and may contain regex metacharacters.
+                const pattern = new RegExp(needle.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&'), 'gi');
+                out = out.replace(pattern, token);
+            }
+            if (out !== node)
+                changed = true;
+            return out;
+        }
+        if (Array.isArray(node))
+            return node.map(walk);
+        if (node && typeof node === 'object')
+            return Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(node).map(([k, v]) => [k, walk(v)]));
+        return node;
+    };
+    const next = walk(value);
+    return { value: changed ? next : value, changed };
+}
+/**
+ * Drop the `custom` values whose field definition is marked sensitive.
+ *
+ * A defect that predates this feature and lands in the middle of it: `custom_field_defs.sensitive`
+ * is declared, stored, editable and documented as "needs `hr.person.view_sensitive`, like a national
+ * identity number" — and nothing has ever read it. `toPerson` returns `custom` whole and `forViewer`
+ * nulls only the four personnel fields, so a field an administrator marked sensitive went to every
+ * holder of `hr.person.view`, which is a `member` default. That is the same failure as a permission
+ * key nothing asks about, one level down.
+ *
+ * Returns the object it was given when there is nothing to strip, so the common path — no sensitive
+ * fields defined, or a reader who holds the permission — allocates nothing.
+ */
+export function stripSensitiveCustom(custom, sensitiveKeys) {
+    if (!sensitiveKeys.size)
+        return custom;
+    const present = Object.keys(custom).filter((k) => sensitiveKeys.has(k));
+    if (!present.length)
+        return custom;
+    const out = { ...custom };
+    for (const k of present)
+        delete out[k];
+    return out;
+}
+/** `YYYY-MM-DD`, `days` before `today`. The boundary a retention horizon is measured from. */
+export function retentionCutoff(days, today = todayIso()) {
+    const d = new Date(`${today}T00:00:00Z`);
+    d.setUTCDate(d.getUTCDate() - days);
+    return d.toISOString().slice(0, 10);
+}
+/** Every retention class, in the order a settings screen should show them. */
+export const RETENTION_CLASSES = [
+    'punchDetail',
+    'punches',
+    'attendanceDays',
+    'leave',
+    'personHistory',
+    'personDocuments',
+    'terminatedPeople',
+    'sensitiveAccessLog',
+];
+/** Null everywhere: the shipped state, and the one this module refuses to guess a number for. */
+export const EMPTY_RETENTION = {
+    punchDetail: null,
+    punches: null,
+    attendanceDays: null,
+    leave: null,
+    personHistory: null,
+    personDocuments: null,
+    terminatedPeople: null,
+    sensitiveAccessLog: null,
+};
+/**
+ * How many rows a subject-access section returns before it is cut.
+ *
+ * A cut is always named in `manifest.truncated` with its numbers — an export that silently omits is
+ * the same failure as an erasure that silently retains. The figures are sized off a five-year
+ * employee punching four times a day: about five thousand punches, eighteen hundred day sheets, two
+ * hundred and fifty ledger movements. Each cap is a few multiples of that, so a normal record is
+ * never cut and a pathological one does not take the process down with it.
+ */
+export const SECTION_CAPS = {
+    employment: 500,
+    offices: 500,
+    history: 20_000,
+    documents: 1_000,
+    leaveRequests: 5_000,
+    leaveRequestDays: 20_000,
+    leaveLedger: 20_000,
+    punches: 40_000,
+    attendanceDays: 10_000,
+    regularizations: 2_000,
+    approvalsRaised: 2_000,
+    approverOn: 2_000,
+    decisions: 5_000,
+    delegations: 1_000,
+    accessLog: 5_000,
+};
+/** `select count(*)` reduced to the number, which is the only thing any caller here wants. */
+const total = async (query) => (await query)[0]?.n ?? 0;
+export class PrivacyService {
+    // ------------------------------------------------------------------ retention
+    /** The stored horizons, defaulted. A workspace that has never set one gets nulls, not numbers. */
+    async retention(tx, workspaceId) {
+        const [row] = await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(retentionSettings)
+            .where(eq(retentionSettings.workspaceId, workspaceId))
+            .limit(1);
+        return {
+            retention: { ...EMPTY_RETENTION, ...(row?.config ?? {}) },
+            updatedAt: row?.updatedAt ?? null,
+            updatedBy: row?.updatedBy ?? null,
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Patch the horizons.
+     *
+     * A field left out is unchanged and a field sent as `null` goes back to "keep indefinitely", which
+     * is the same reading `core.settings.setModule` gives a partial write — a caller that has nothing
+     * to say about a class must not silently reset it.
+     */
+    async setRetention(tx, workspaceId, patch, actorUserId) {
+        const current = await this.retention(tx, workspaceId);
+        const config = { ...current.retention };
+        for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(patch))
+            config[key] = value ?? null;
+        const updatedAt = new Date();
+        await tx
+            .insert(retentionSettings)
+            .values({ workspaceId, config, updatedAt, updatedBy: actorUserId })
+            .onConflictDoUpdate({
+            target: retentionSettings.workspaceId,
+            set: { config, updatedAt, updatedBy: actorUserId },
+        });
+        return { retention: { ...EMPTY_RETENTION, ...config }, updatedAt, updatedBy: actorUserId };
+    }
+    /**
+     * How much is already past each horizon — the dry run a retention screen shows before anything
+     * runs, and the only thing that reads these numbers today.
+     *
+     * Null for a class with no horizon set: there is nothing to be past. One query per class that has
+     * one, which is why the caller asks for this rather than getting it on every read.
+     *
+     * `attendanceDays` deliberately excludes locked days and `terminatedPeople` excludes anybody
+     * already erased, so the number is what a sweep *could* act on rather than what merely matches a
+     * date. A count that overstates is a count nobody trusts the second time they check it.
+     */
+    async retentionCounts(tx, workspaceId, retention, today = todayIso()) {
+        const out = {};
+        for (const cls of RETENTION_CLASSES)
+            out[cls] = null;
+        const one = async (cls, run) => {
+            const days = retention[cls];
+            if (days === null)
+                return;
+            out[cls] = await run(retentionCutoff(days, today));
+        };
+        await one('punchDetail', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(punches)
+            .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(punches.businessDate, cutoff), or(isNotNull(punches.geo), isNotNull(punches.deviceId), isNotNull(punches.note))))));
+        await one('punches', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(punches)
+            .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(punches.businessDate, cutoff)))));
+        await one('attendanceDays', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(attendanceDays)
+            .where(and(eq(attendanceDays.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(attendanceDays.businessDate, cutoff), eq(attendanceDays.locked, false)))));
+        await one('leave', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(leaveLedger)
+            .where(and(eq(leaveLedger.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(leaveLedger.effectiveOn, cutoff)))));
+        await one('personHistory', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(personHistory)
+            .where(and(eq(personHistory.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(personHistory.at, new Date(`${cutoff}T00:00:00Z`)), or(isNotNull(personHistory.from), isNotNull(personHistory.to))))));
+        await one('personDocuments', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(personDocuments)
+            .where(and(eq(personDocuments.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(personDocuments.createdAt, new Date(`${cutoff}T00:00:00Z`))))));
+        await one('terminatedPeople', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(people)
+            .where(and(eq(people.workspaceId, workspaceId), isNotNull(people.terminatedOn), lt(people.terminatedOn, cutoff), isNull(people.erasedAt)))));
+        await one('sensitiveAccessLog', (cutoff) => total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(sensitiveAccessLog)
+            .where(and(eq(sensitiveAccessLog.workspaceId, workspaceId), lt(sensitiveAccessLog.at, new Date(`${cutoff}T00:00:00Z`))))));
+        return out;
+    }
+    // ------------------------------------------------------------------ erasure
+    /**
+     * Redact one person, or say what redacting them would do.
+     *
+     * Runs inside the caller's transaction, so the whole erasure commits or none of it does — a
+     * half-run erasure is worse than a refused one, and this is the only way to be sure there is no
+     * such state to be in.
+     */
+    async erase(tx, opts) {
+        const { workspaceId, personId, dryRun } = opts;
+        const [person] = await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(people)
+            .where(and(eq(people.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(people.id, personId)))
+            .limit(1);
+        if (!person)
+            throw KernError.notFound('Person');
+        const caveats = new Set();
+        const token = erasureDisplayName(person);
+        const names = [person.displayName].filter((n) => n !== token);
+        // ---- files this erasure orphans, gathered before the pointers are cleared -------------
+        const leaveDocs = await tx
+            .select({ fileId: leaveRequests.documentFileId })
+            .from(leaveRequests)
+            .where(and(eq(leaveRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveRequests.personId, personId), isNotNull(leaveRequests.documentFileId)));
+        const orphaned = [
+            ...(person.photoFileId ? [person.photoFileId] : []),
+            ...leaveDocs.map((r) => r.fileId).filter((id) => id !== null),
+        ];
+        const filesRemaining = [...new Set([...(person.erasedFileIds ?? []), ...orphaned])];
+        if (person.photoFileId)
+            caveats.add('photoFileOrphaned');
+        if (leaveDocs.length)
+            caveats.add('leaveDocumentFilesRemain');
+        /**
+         * Punches inside a closed month are left exactly as they are.
+         *
+         * The module's standing rule is that a locked period does not move, and `hr.period.manage` — an
+         * owner's key — is what unlocks one. Clearing a note or a location does not change a figure, but
+         * it is still a write into a month a payroll has been filed against, and quietly making an
+         * exception for erasure is how "locked" stops meaning anything. So these rows are skipped, the
+         * report says so, and because erasure is replayable the owner unlocks and runs it again to
+         * finish the job. Surfacing the decision rather than encoding it.
+         */
+        const notLocked = sql `not exists (select 1 from ${attendanceDays} ad
+      where ad.workspace_id = ${punches.workspaceId}
+        and ad.person_id = ${punches.personId}
+        and ad.business_date = ${punches.businessDate}
+        and ad.locked)`;
+        const punchesDirty = or(isNotNull(punches.geo), isNotNull(punches.deviceId), isNotNull(punches.note), isNotNull(punches.clientReportedAt));
+        const lockedPunches = await total(tx
+            .select({ n: count() })
+            .from(punches)
+            .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(punches.personId, personId), punchesDirty, sql `not (${notLocked})`)));
+        if (lockedPunches > 0)
+            caveats.add('lockedPeriodUntouched');
+        // ---- the steps -----------------------------------------------------------------------
+        const now = new Date();
+        const sensitiveDirty = [
+            isNotNull(peopleSensitive.birthDate),
+            isNotNull(peopleSensitive.ibanEnc),
+            isNotNull(peopleSensitive.emergencyContact),
+        ];
+        if (!opts.keepNationalIdForAudit)
+            sensitiveDirty.push(isNotNull(peopleSensitive.nationalIdEnc));
+        if (opts.keepNationalIdForAudit)
+            caveats.add('nationalIdKeptForAudit');
+        const steps = [
+            {
+                class: 'identity',
+                table: 'people',
+                columns: [
+                    'userId',
+                    'displayName',
+                    'workEmail',
+                    'personalEmail',
+                    'phone',
+                    'photoFileId',
+                    'timezone',
+                    'custom',
+                ],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(people)
+                    .where(and(eq(people.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(people.id, personId), isNull(people.erasedAt)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(people)
+                        .set({
+                        userId: null,
+                        displayName: token,
+                        workEmail: null,
+                        personalEmail: null,
+                        phone: null,
+                        photoFileId: null,
+                        timezone: null,
+                        custom: {},
+                        erasedAt: now,
+                        erasedBy: opts.actorUserId,
+                        erasureReason: opts.reason,
+                        erasedFileIds: filesRemaining.length ? filesRemaining : null,
+                        updatedAt: now,
+                    })
+                        .where(and(eq(people.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(people.id, personId), isNull(people.erasedAt)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'sensitive',
+                table: 'people_sensitive',
+                columns: opts.keepNationalIdForAudit
+                    ? ['birthDate', 'iban', 'emergencyContact']
+                    : ['nationalId', 'birthDate', 'iban', 'emergencyContact'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(peopleSensitive)
+                    .where(and(eq(peopleSensitive.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(peopleSensitive.personId, personId), or(...sensitiveDirty)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    // The row survives rather than being deleted: "sensitive data was held here and cleared on
+                    // this date" is exactly what the erasure response has to be able to say afterwards.
+                    await t
+                        .update(peopleSensitive)
+                        .set({
+                        ...(opts.keepNationalIdForAudit ? {} : { nationalIdEnc: null }),
+                        birthDate: null,
+                        ibanEnc: null,
+                        emergencyContact: null,
+                        updatedAt: now,
+                    })
+                        .where(and(eq(peopleSensitive.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(peopleSensitive.personId, personId), or(...sensitiveDirty)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                // A pointer, not a record. An erased person heading a department renders as a tombstone at
+                // the top of the org chart, which is the one place the redaction is loudest.
+                class: 'headship',
+                table: 'offices',
+                columns: ['headPersonId'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(offices)
+                    .where(and(eq(offices.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(offices.headPersonId, personId)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(offices)
+                        .set({ headPersonId: null })
+                        .where(and(eq(offices.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(offices.headPersonId, personId)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'headship',
+                table: 'org_units',
+                columns: ['headPersonId'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(orgUnits)
+                    .where(and(eq(orgUnits.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(orgUnits.headPersonId, personId)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(orgUnits)
+                        .set({ headPersonId: null })
+                        .where(and(eq(orgUnits.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(orgUnits.headPersonId, personId)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                // The values go, the rows stay: "personalEmail changed on 3 March, by X" survives and the
+                // address does not. Erasing the trail and erasing the data are different acts.
+                class: 'history',
+                table: 'person_history',
+                columns: ['from', 'to'],
+                count: (t) => total(t.select({ n: count() }).from(personHistory).where(this.historyWhere(workspaceId, personId))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(personHistory)
+                        .set({ from: null, to: null })
+                        .where(this.historyWhere(workspaceId, personId));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                // Where somebody was, on what device, and what they typed. Far beyond what an attendance
+                // dispute needs; the direction, the instant and the business date are what it does need.
+                class: 'punches',
+                table: 'punches',
+                columns: ['geo', 'deviceId', 'note', 'clientReportedAt'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(punches)
+                    .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(punches.personId, personId), punchesDirty, notLocked))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(punches)
+                        .set({ geo: null, deviceId: null, note: null, clientReportedAt: null })
+                        .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(punches.personId, personId), punchesDirty, notLocked));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                // `reason` on a leave request is routinely health data — "chemotherapy", "funeral". The
+                // dates, the working days and the status are the pay record and stay.
+                class: 'leaveRequests',
+                table: 'leave_requests',
+                columns: ['reason', 'documentFileId'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(leaveRequests)
+                    .where(and(eq(leaveRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveRequests.personId, personId), or(isNotNull(leaveRequests.reason), isNotNull(leaveRequests.documentFileId))))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(leaveRequests)
+                        .set({ reason: null, documentFileId: null, updatedAt: now })
+                        .where(and(eq(leaveRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveRequests.personId, personId), or(isNotNull(leaveRequests.reason), isNotNull(leaveRequests.documentFileId))));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'leaveLedger',
+                table: 'leave_ledger',
+                columns: ['reason'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(leaveLedger)
+                    .where(and(eq(leaveLedger.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveLedger.personId, personId), isNotNull(leaveLedger.reason)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(leaveLedger)
+                        .set({ reason: null })
+                        .where(and(eq(leaveLedger.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveLedger.personId, personId), isNotNull(leaveLedger.reason)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                // "performance", "returning from maternity leave" — free text about a person, on a row whose
+                // dates and hours are the statutory record.
+                class: 'employment',
+                table: 'employments',
+                columns: ['reason'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(employments)
+                    .where(and(eq(employments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(employments.personId, personId), isNotNull(employments.reason)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(employments)
+                        .set({ reason: null })
+                        .where(and(eq(employments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(employments.personId, personId), isNotNull(employments.reason)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'officeAssignments',
+                table: 'office_assignments',
+                columns: ['reason'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(officeAssignments)
+                    .where(and(eq(officeAssignments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(officeAssignments.personId, personId), isNotNull(officeAssignments.reason)))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(officeAssignments)
+                        .set({ reason: null })
+                        .where(and(eq(officeAssignments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(officeAssignments.personId, personId), isNotNull(officeAssignments.reason)));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                // `reason` is `not null` here, so it is emptied rather than nulled. `proposed` and `status`
+                // stay: they justify a corrected day sheet that payroll relies on.
+                class: 'regularizations',
+                table: 'regularizations',
+                columns: ['reason'],
+                count: (t) => total(t
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(regularizations)
+                    .where(and(eq(regularizations.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(regularizations.personId, personId), ne(regularizations.reason, '')))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t
+                        .update(regularizations)
+                        .set({ reason: '' })
+                        .where(and(eq(regularizations.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(regularizations.personId, personId), ne(regularizations.reason, '')));
+                },
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'delegations',
+                table: 'delegations',
+                columns: ['reason'],
+                count: (t) => total(t.select({ n: count() }).from(delegations).where(this.delegationWhere(workspaceId, personId))),
+                apply: async (t) => {
+                    await t.update(delegations).set({ reason: null }).where(this.delegationWhere(workspaceId, personId));
+                },
+            },
+        ];
+        const redacted = [];
+        for (const step of steps) {
+            const rows = await step.count(tx);
+            if (rows > 0 && !dryRun)
+                await step.apply(tx);
+            redacted.push({ class: step.class, table: step.table, rows, columns: step.columns });
+        }
+        // ---- the two that cannot be one predicate ---------------------------------------------
+        redacted.push(await this.redactApprovals(tx, workspaceId, personId, names, token, dryRun));
+        redacted.push(await this.redactDecisions(tx, workspaceId, personId, dryRun));
+        // ---- what survived, and on what basis --------------------------------------------------
+        const { retention } = await this.retention(tx, workspaceId);
+        const kept = await this.keptClasses(tx, workspaceId, personId, retention);
+        if (kept.some((k) => k.class === 'documents' && k.rows > 0))
+            caveats.add('documentFilesRemain');
+        if (kept.some((k) => k.class === 'history' && k.basis === 'anotherPersonsRecord' && k.rows > 0))
+            caveats.add('actorHistoryKept');
+        return {
+            // A replay keeps the first erasure's date rather than restamping it: the second run finds
+            // nothing left to clear, and moving the timestamp would misdate the act for the one field
+            // somebody would later be asked to produce.
+            erasedAt: person.erasedAt ?? (dryRun ? null : now),
+            // The token on both paths, never the name being replaced. A dry run is what a confirmation
+            // dialog reads before somebody presses through, so "this is the name the directory will show"
+            // is the useful answer — and echoing the real name back would put it in a response whose whole
+            // subject is removing it. Already-erased rows recompute to the same token, because it is
+            // derived from `employee_no` and the row id, neither of which an erasure changes.
+            displayName: token,
+            redacted,
+            kept,
+            caveats: [...caveats],
+            filesRemaining,
+        };
+    }
+    historyWhere(workspaceId, personId) {
+        return and(eq(personHistory.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(personHistory.personId, personId), inArray(personHistory.field, [...REDACTED_HISTORY_FIELDS]), or(isNotNull(personHistory.from), isNotNull(personHistory.to)));
+    }
+    delegationWhere(workspaceId, personId) {
+        return and(eq(delegations.workspaceId, workspaceId), or(eq(delegations.fromPersonId, personId), eq(delegations.toPersonId, personId)), isNotNull(delegations.reason));
+    }
+    /**
+     * The approval requests this person raised: the English summary, the same sentence as data, and
+     * any name embedded in the snapshotted chain.
+     *
+     * Row by row rather than one `update`, because the chain is jsonb that has to be read to be
+     * scrubbed. The set is small — an approval request per leave request — and skipping rows that
+     * scrub to themselves is what keeps a replay at zero.
+     */
+    async redactApprovals(tx, workspaceId, personId, names, token, dryRun) {
+        const rows = await tx
+            .select({
+            id: approvalRequests.id,
+            summary: approvalRequests.summary,
+            chain: approvalRequests.chain,
+            params: approvalRequests.summaryParams,
+        })
+            .from(approvalRequests)
+            .where(and(eq(approvalRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(approvalRequests.requesterPersonId, personId)));
+        let touched = 0;
+        for (const row of rows) {
+            const scrubbed = scrubNames(row.chain, names, token);
+            const dirty = row.summary !== '' || row.params !== null || scrubbed.changed;
+            if (!dirty)
+                continue;
+            touched += 1;
+            if (dryRun)
+                continue;
+            await tx
+                .update(approvalRequests)
+                .set({
+                summary: '',
+                summaryParams: null,
+                chain: scrubbed.value,
+            })
+                .where(eq(approvalRequests.id, row.id));
+        }
+        return {
+            class: 'approvals',
+            table: 'approval_requests',
+            rows: touched,
+            columns: ['summary', 'summaryParams', 'chain'],
+        };
+    }
+    /**
+     * Approver comments, on both paths.
+     *
+     * A comment is free text an approver wrote. On the subject's erasure it is somebody talking about
+     * the subject; on the approver's own erasure it is the approver's own speech. Both are personal
+     * data about the person being erased, so both are cleared — the decision itself, who made it and
+     * when, are the authorisation record and stay.
+     */
+    async redactDecisions(tx, workspaceId, personId, dryRun) {
+        const requestIds = (await tx
+            .select({ id: approvalRequests.id })
+            .from(approvalRequests)
+            .where(and(eq(approvalRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(approvalRequests.requesterPersonId, personId)))).map((r) => r.id);
+        const stepIds = requestIds.length
+            ? (await tx
+                .select({ id: approvalSteps.id })
+                .from(approvalSteps)
+                .where(and(eq(approvalSteps.workspaceId, workspaceId), inArray(approvalSteps.requestId, requestIds)))).map((r) => r.id)
+            : [];
+        const target = stepIds.length
+            ? or(eq(approvalDecisions.approverId, personId), inArray(approvalDecisions.stepId, stepIds))
+            : eq(approvalDecisions.approverId, personId);
+        const where = and(eq(approvalDecisions.workspaceId, workspaceId), target, isNotNull(approvalDecisions.comment));
+        const [row] = await tx.select({ n: count() }).from(approvalDecisions).where(where);
+        const rows = row?.n ?? 0;
+        if (rows > 0 && !dryRun)
+            await tx.update(approvalDecisions).set({ comment: null }).where(where);
+        return { class: 'approvalDecisions', table: 'approval_decisions', rows, columns: ['comment'] };
+    }
+    /**
+     * The records that survive, counted, with the basis each survives under.
+     *
+     * `retentionHorizon` wins over the statutory reason wherever the workspace has actually set one:
+     * with a horizon in force, the horizon is the operative answer to "why is this still here", and
+     * the number the administrator typed is the thing they will recognise. Without one it falls back
+     * to what the record is — a wage, an entitlement, or an authorisation.
+     */
+    async keptClasses(tx, workspaceId, personId, retention) {
+        const basis = (days, fallback) => days === null ? fallback : 'retentionHorizon';
+        const out = [
+            {
+                class: 'employment',
+                table: 'employments',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(employments)
+                    .where(and(eq(employments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(employments.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: 'payRecord',
+                retentionDays: null,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'officeAssignments',
+                table: 'office_assignments',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(officeAssignments)
+                    .where(and(eq(officeAssignments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(officeAssignments.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: 'payRecord',
+                retentionDays: null,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'leaveLedger',
+                table: 'leave_ledger',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(leaveLedger)
+                    .where(and(eq(leaveLedger.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveLedger.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: basis(retention.leave, 'payRecord'),
+                retentionDays: retention.leave,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'leaveRequests',
+                table: 'leave_requests',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(leaveRequests)
+                    .where(and(eq(leaveRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveRequests.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: basis(retention.leave, 'payRecord'),
+                retentionDays: retention.leave,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'attendance',
+                table: 'attendance_days',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(attendanceDays)
+                    .where(and(eq(attendanceDays.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(attendanceDays.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: basis(retention.attendanceDays, 'payRecord'),
+                retentionDays: retention.attendanceDays,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'punches',
+                table: 'punches',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(punches)
+                    .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(punches.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: basis(retention.punches, 'payRecord'),
+                retentionDays: retention.punches,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'history',
+                table: 'person_history',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(personHistory)
+                    .where(and(eq(personHistory.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(personHistory.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: basis(retention.personHistory, 'auditTrail'),
+                retentionDays: retention.personHistory,
+            },
+            {
+                /**
+                 * Rows where this person was the **actor** on somebody else's record.
+                 *
+                 * Left alone, values and all. Erasing A is not authority to rewrite the trail of what A did
+                 * to B's record — that trail is B's, and B did not ask for anything.
+                 */
+                class: 'history',
+                table: 'person_history',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(personHistory)
+                    .where(and(eq(personHistory.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(personHistory.actorId, personId), ne(personHistory.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: 'anotherPersonsRecord',
+                retentionDays: null,
+            },
+            {
+                /**
+                 * The rows stay and so do the files, because HR cannot delete a core object: `core.files.get`
+                 * is the only file procedure a module can reach. Nulling the row would remove the last record
+                 * of which files those were and leave the passport scan in the bucket regardless — a promise
+                 * with nothing behind it, and the worst kind, because the response would say the document was
+                 * erased.
+                 */
+                class: 'documents',
+                table: 'person_documents',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(personDocuments)
+                    .where(and(eq(personDocuments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(personDocuments.personId, personId)))),
+                basis: 'notRemovable',
+                retentionDays: retention.personDocuments,
+            },
+            {
+                class: 'approvals',
+                table: 'approval_requests',
+                rows: await total(tx
+                    .select({ n: count() })
+                    .from(approvalRequests)
+                    .where(and(eq(approvalRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(approvalRequests.requesterPersonId, personId)))),
+                basis: 'auditTrail',
+                retentionDays: null,
+            },
+        ];
+        return out;
+    }
+    // ------------------------------------------------------------------ subject access
+    /**
+     * Every row HR holds about one person.
+     *
+     * Reads only — the sensitive decrypt and its access-log row are the caller's job, because that
+     * pairing lives in `PeopleService.readSensitive` and there must go on being exactly one place in
+     * this module that decrypts these columns.
+     *
+     * Each section fetches `cap + 1` rows so a cut is detectable without a second `count`, and every
+     * cut is reported. Nothing is dropped in silence.
+     */
+    async subjectAccess(tx, workspaceId, personId) {
+        const truncated = [];
+        const cut = (section, rows) => {
+            const cap = SECTION_CAPS[section];
+            if (rows.length <= cap)
+                return rows;
+            truncated.push({ section, returned: cap, cap });
+            return rows.slice(0, cap);
+        };
+        const limitOf = (section) => SECTION_CAPS[section] + 1;
+        const employment = cut('employment', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(employments)
+            .where(and(eq(employments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(employments.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(employments.effectiveFrom))
+            .limit(limitOf('employment')));
+        const officeRows = cut('offices', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(officeAssignments)
+            .where(and(eq(officeAssignments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(officeAssignments.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(officeAssignments.effectiveFrom))
+            .limit(limitOf('offices')));
+        const history = cut('history', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(personHistory)
+            .where(and(eq(personHistory.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(personHistory.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(personHistory.at), desc(personHistory.id))
+            .limit(limitOf('history')));
+        const documents = cut('documents', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(personDocuments)
+            .where(and(eq(personDocuments.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(personDocuments.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(personDocuments.createdAt))
+            .limit(limitOf('documents')));
+        const requests = cut('leaveRequests', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(leaveRequests)
+            .where(and(eq(leaveRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveRequests.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(leaveRequests.startsOn))
+            .limit(limitOf('leaveRequests')));
+        const days = cut('leaveRequestDays', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(leaveRequestDays)
+            .where(and(eq(leaveRequestDays.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveRequestDays.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(asc(leaveRequestDays.date))
+            .limit(limitOf('leaveRequestDays')));
+        // Oldest first: the ledger is only meaningful read in order, and the running balance in the
+        // bundle is the reason it is sent that way rather than newest-first like everything else.
+        const ledger = cut('leaveLedger', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(leaveLedger)
+            .where(and(eq(leaveLedger.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(leaveLedger.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(asc(leaveLedger.effectiveOn), asc(leaveLedger.id))
+            .limit(limitOf('leaveLedger')));
+        const typeIds = [...new Set(ledger.map((r) => r.leaveTypeId).concat(requests.map((r) => r.leaveTypeId)))];
+        const types = typeIds.length
+            ? await tx
+                .select()
+                .from(leaveTypes)
+                .where(and(eq(leaveTypes.workspaceId, workspaceId), inArray(leaveTypes.id, typeIds)))
+            : [];
+        const punchRows = cut('punches', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(punches)
+            .where(and(eq(punches.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(punches.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(punches.businessDate), desc(punches.at))
+            .limit(limitOf('punches')));
+        const dayRows = cut('attendanceDays', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(attendanceDays)
+            .where(and(eq(attendanceDays.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(attendanceDays.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(attendanceDays.businessDate))
+            .limit(limitOf('attendanceDays')));
+        const regs = cut('regularizations', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(regularizations)
+            .where(and(eq(regularizations.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(regularizations.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(regularizations.businessDate))
+            .limit(limitOf('regularizations')));
+        const raised = cut('approvalsRaised', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(approvalRequests)
+            .where(and(eq(approvalRequests.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(approvalRequests.requesterPersonId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(approvalRequests.requestedAt))
+            .limit(limitOf('approvalsRaised')));
+        // `approver_ids` is a uuid[] of **person** ids, and the gin index on it is what makes this an
+        // overlap lookup rather than a scan of every step the workspace has ever raised.
+        const approverOn = cut('approverOn', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(approvalSteps)
+            .where(and(eq(approvalSteps.workspaceId, workspaceId), sql `${approvalSteps.approverIds} && array[${personId}]::uuid[]`))
+            .orderBy(desc(approvalSteps.id))
+            .limit(limitOf('approverOn')));
+        const ownDecisions = cut('decisions', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(approvalDecisions)
+            .where(and(eq(approvalDecisions.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(approvalDecisions.approverId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(approvalDecisions.at))
+            .limit(limitOf('decisions')));
+        // Steps of their own requests, plus the steps they were named on, so `approverOn` can carry its
+        // decisions rather than being a list of steps with no outcome.
+        const raisedStepIds = raised.length
+            ? (await tx
+                .select({ id: approvalSteps.id })
+                .from(approvalSteps)
+                .where(and(eq(approvalSteps.workspaceId, workspaceId), inArray(approvalSteps.requestId, raised.map((r) => r.id))))).map((r) => r.id)
+            : [];
+        const stepIds = [...new Set([...raisedStepIds, ...approverOn.map((s) => s.id)])];
+        const stepDecisions = stepIds.length
+            ? await tx
+                .select()
+                .from(approvalDecisions)
+                .where(and(eq(approvalDecisions.workspaceId, workspaceId), inArray(approvalDecisions.stepId, stepIds)))
+            : [];
+        const raisedSteps = raisedStepIds.length
+            ? await tx
+                .select()
+                .from(approvalSteps)
+                .where(and(eq(approvalSteps.workspaceId, workspaceId), inArray(approvalSteps.id, raisedStepIds)))
+                .orderBy(asc(approvalSteps.stepIndex))
+            : [];
+        const given = cut('delegations', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(delegations)
+            .where(and(eq(delegations.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(delegations.fromPersonId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(delegations.startsOn))
+            .limit(limitOf('delegations')));
+        const received = cut('delegations', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(delegations)
+            .where(and(eq(delegations.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(delegations.toPersonId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(delegations.startsOn))
+            .limit(limitOf('delegations')));
+        const accessLog = cut('accessLog', await tx
+            .select()
+            .from(sensitiveAccessLog)
+            .where(and(eq(sensitiveAccessLog.workspaceId, workspaceId), eq(sensitiveAccessLog.personId, personId)))
+            .orderBy(desc(sensitiveAccessLog.at), desc(sensitiveAccessLog.id))
+            .limit(limitOf('accessLog')));
+        return {
+            employment,
+            offices: officeRows,
+            history,
+            documents,
+            leave: { types, requests, days, ledger },
+            attendance: { punches: punchRows, days: dayRows },
+            regularizations: regs,
+            approvals: { raised, raisedSteps, approverOn, stepDecisions, decisions: ownDecisions },
+            delegations: { given, received },
+            accessLog,
+            truncated,
+        };
+    }
+}
+/** The running total down an ordered ledger. "Why is my balance this number", answered in the file. */
+export const closingBalance = (ledger) => ledger.reduce((sum, entry) => sum + entry.amountMinutes, 0);
+//# sourceMappingURL=privacy.js.map