@jairodri/huckleberry-cli 1.0.1 → 1.1.0

package/skills/sales-enablement/evals/evals.json

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+{
+  "skill_name": "sales-enablement",
+  "evals": [
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "prompt": "Help me create a sales deck for our B2B SaaS product. We sell an employee engagement platform to HR directors at companies with 500-5000 employees. Our main differentiator is real-time pulse surveys with AI-powered insights.",
+      "expected_output": "Should check for product-marketing-context.md first. Should apply the 10-12 slide sales deck framework: Title, Problem/Stakes, Current Solutions Failing, Vision, Product/Solution, How It Works, Proof (case studies/metrics), Pricing, Why Now, and Next Steps. Should tailor the deck to the HR director audience and employee engagement space. Should incorporate the differentiator (real-time pulse surveys + AI insights). Should provide slide-by-slide content recommendations with speaker notes. Should recommend visual direction.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Checks for product-marketing-context.md",
+        "Applies 10-12 slide framework",
+        "Includes Problem, Solution, Proof, Pricing, Next Steps slides",
+        "Tailors to HR director audience",
+        "Incorporates stated differentiator",
+        "Provides slide-by-slide content",
+        "Includes speaker notes or talking points"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "prompt": "Our sales team keeps getting the same objections. The top ones are: 'we already use SurveyMonkey,' 'we don't have budget right now,' and 'our team is too small to need this.' Help me create an objection handling doc.",
+      "expected_output": "Should apply the objection handling framework with the response structure for each objection. Should categorize the objections (competitor/status quo, budget, need/timing). For each objection, should provide: acknowledge, reframe, evidence/proof, bridge to value, and follow-up question. Should provide 2-3 response variations per objection for different contexts. Should organize as a document sales reps can reference quickly during calls.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Applies objection handling framework",
+        "Categorizes the three objections",
+        "Provides structured response for each (acknowledge, reframe, evidence, bridge)",
+        "Provides 2-3 response variations per objection",
+        "Organizes for quick reference during calls",
+        "Categorizes objections using the skill's framework (competitor, budget, need/timing)"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "prompt": "i need a one-pager we can leave behind after sales meetings. something that summarizes our product and key benefits.",
+      "expected_output": "Should trigger on casual phrasing. Should apply the one-pager/leave-behind framework. Should include: headline with core value proposition, key benefits (3-5), social proof (customer logos, key metric), how it works (simplified), pricing summary or 'starting at' range, and clear next step CTA. Should recommend design principles for a one-pager: scannable, visual hierarchy, not text-heavy. Should note this should fit on one page (front, or front and back).",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Triggers on casual phrasing",
+        "Applies one-pager/leave-behind framework",
+        "Includes headline, benefits, social proof, how it works, CTA",
+        "Keeps to one page format",
+        "Recommends scannable design",
+        "Provides specific content for each section"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "prompt": "Create a demo script for our analytics dashboard product. Typical demo is 30 minutes with a VP of Marketing.",
+      "expected_output": "Should apply the demo script/talk track framework with the 5-part structure. Should include: opening (rapport, agenda setting, discovery questions), problem validation (confirm their pain), solution walkthrough (show product addressing their pain), proof points (metrics, case studies during demo), and close (next steps, timeline). Should time-box each section for 30 minutes. Should include key questions to ask during discovery. Should note when to customize based on prospect's answers.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Applies 5-part demo script structure",
+        "Includes opening with discovery questions",
+        "Includes problem validation",
+        "Includes solution walkthrough",
+        "Includes proof points",
+        "Includes close with next steps",
+        "Time-boxes for 30 minutes",
+        "Notes customization based on prospect responses"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "prompt": "Help me build an ROI calculator we can use during sales calls. We need to show prospects how much money they'll save by switching to our product.",
+      "expected_output": "Should apply the ROI calculator framework. Should define inputs (what data to collect from the prospect: team size, current costs, time spent on manual processes), calculation methodology (how to compute savings), and output format (visual showing ROI timeline, payback period, annual savings). Should recommend keeping calculations transparent and conservative. Should suggest validating assumptions during the sales call. Should provide the calculator structure and formula logic.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Applies ROI calculator framework",
+        "Defines required inputs",
+        "Provides calculation methodology",
+        "Recommends conservative assumptions",
+        "Includes ROI timeline and payback period",
+        "Suggests validating assumptions during calls",
+        "Provides calculator structure"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "prompt": "We need a public comparison page showing how we stack up against Zendesk and Intercom.",
+      "expected_output": "Should recognize this is a public-facing competitor comparison page, not internal sales collateral. Should defer to or cross-reference the competitor-alternatives skill, which handles public comparison and alternatives pages. Sales-enablement covers internal materials (battle cards, objection handling) while competitor-alternatives handles SEO-focused public comparison content.",
+      "assertions": [
+        "Recognizes this as a public comparison page",
+        "References or defers to competitor-alternatives skill",
+        "Explains the distinction between internal and public collateral",
+        "Does not attempt public SEO comparison page using sales enablement patterns"
+      ],
+      "files": []
+    }
+  ]
+}

package/skills/sales-enablement/references/deck-frameworks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
+# Sales Deck Frameworks
+
+Detailed slide-by-slide guidance for building sales decks that tell a story and close deals.
+
+## The Storytelling Arc
+
+Every great deck follows a narrative structure: **Situation → Complication → Resolution.**
+
+- **Situation** (Slides 1-3): The world your buyer lives in. Establish shared understanding.
+- **Complication** (Slides 2-3): Why the status quo is no longer sustainable. Create urgency.
+- **Resolution** (Slides 4-11): Your approach, proof, and path forward.
+
+The goal is not to present features. The goal is to make the buyer feel understood, then show them a better way.
+
+---
+
+## Slide-by-Slide Template
+
+### Slide 1: Current World Problem
+
+**What to include:**
+- The challenge your buyer faces daily
+- A stat or data point that quantifies the problem
+- Visual: simple graphic or striking number
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Starting with your company or product
+- Generic industry trends that don't connect to pain
+- More than one core problem
+
+**Copy prompt:** "What is the one problem that, if you could describe it perfectly, would make your buyer say 'that's exactly my situation'?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 2: Cost of the Problem
+
+**What to include:**
+- Financial impact (revenue lost, costs incurred)
+- Time impact (hours wasted, delays)
+- Risk impact (what happens if they do nothing)
+- Specific numbers wherever possible
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Vague claims without data
+- Fear-mongering without substance
+- Too many metrics (pick 2-3 that hit hardest)
+
+**Copy prompt:** "If your buyer does nothing for the next 12 months, what does it cost them?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 3: The Shift Happening
+
+**What to include:**
+- Market trend or technology change creating a new opportunity
+- Why "the old way" no longer works
+- Why now is the right time to act
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Hype-driven trends without substance
+- Making it about your product yet
+- Overly technical explanations
+
+**Copy prompt:** "What has changed in the market that makes the old approach unsustainable?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 4: Your Approach
+
+**What to include:**
+- Your philosophy or unique point of view
+- How your approach differs from conventional solutions
+- The "aha" insight that led to your product
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Feature lists (too early)
+- Jargon or acronyms
+- Claiming to be "the only" or "the first" unless provably true
+
+**Copy prompt:** "What do you believe about solving this problem that most people get wrong?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 5: Product Walkthrough
+
+**What to include:**
+- 3-4 key workflows that map to the pain from Slide 1
+- Screenshots or product visuals
+- Brief description of what each workflow accomplishes
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Showing every feature
+- Dense UI screenshots without callouts
+- Talking about technology instead of outcomes
+
+**Copy prompt:** "Walk through 3 things the buyer would do in your product in their first week."
+
+---
+
+### Slide 6: Proof Points
+
+**What to include:**
+- Customer logos (aim for recognizable names in their industry)
+- Key metrics: "X% improvement," "Y hours saved," "Z% increase"
+- Analyst recognition, awards, or certifications if relevant
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Unsubstantiated claims
+- Too many logos without context
+- Vanity metrics that don't relate to the buyer's pain
+
+**Copy prompt:** "What are 3 numbers that prove your product works?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 7: Case Study
+
+**What to include:**
+- One customer story told well: challenge, solution, results
+- Specific metrics (before and after)
+- Customer quote if available
+- Choose a customer similar to the prospect
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Multiple case studies crammed into one slide
+- Generic outcomes without specifics
+- Customers from irrelevant industries
+
+**Copy prompt:** "Tell the story of one customer who went from struggling to succeeding with your product."
+
+---
+
+### Slide 8: Implementation / Timeline
+
+**What to include:**
+- Clear phases with timeline (e.g., Week 1: Setup, Week 2-3: Integration, Week 4: Live)
+- What's required from their side vs. yours
+- Support resources available
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Overcomplicating the process
+- Hiding time requirements
+- Skipping the "what do I need to do?" question
+
+**Copy prompt:** "How does a customer get from signing to live? What does each week look like?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 9: ROI / Value
+
+**What to include:**
+- Expected return based on their inputs or industry benchmarks
+- Payback period
+- Total value over 1-3 years
+- Comparison to cost of inaction
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Unrealistic projections
+- ROI without showing your math
+- Generic numbers not tied to their situation
+
+**Copy prompt:** "If they buy today, what does the next 12 months look like in dollars and hours?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 10: Pricing Overview
+
+**What to include:**
+- Pricing tiers or structure
+- What's included at each level
+- Recommended plan for their situation
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Burying the price or being cagey
+- Too many options (3 tiers max)
+- Surprising them with hidden costs
+
+**Copy prompt:** "What does it cost, what do they get, and which plan is right for them?"
+
+---
+
+### Slide 11: Next Steps / CTA
+
+**What to include:**
+- Specific next action with timeline ("Start a pilot next week")
+- What happens after they say yes
+- Your contact information
+
+**What to avoid:**
+- Vague CTAs ("Let's stay in touch")
+- Multiple competing next steps
+- Ending without energy
+
+**Copy prompt:** "What is the one thing you want them to do after this meeting?"
+
+---
+
+## Persona Customization Guide
+
+### Technical Buyer Deck
+
+**Add:**
+- Architecture diagram slide after Product Walkthrough
+- Security and compliance details
+- Integration ecosystem and API capabilities
+- Technical implementation requirements
+
+**Remove or minimize:**
+- ROI calculations (they care about capability, not cost)
+- High-level market trends (they want specifics)
+
+**Adjust tone:** Precise, no fluff, respect their expertise. Avoid marketing superlatives.
+
+### Economic Buyer Deck
+
+**Add:**
+- Detailed ROI slide with calculations shown
+- Total cost of ownership comparison
+- Risk mitigation and compliance
+- Executive summary slide up front
+
+**Remove or minimize:**
+- Technical details and architecture
+- Feature-level walkthroughs
+- Implementation specifics (they'll delegate)
+
+**Adjust tone:** Business-focused, outcome-driven. Speak in dollars and percentages.
+
+### Champion Deck
+
+**Add:**
+- "Internal selling" slide — key points for them to present to their team
+- Quick-win slide — what success looks like in 30 days
+- Peer proof — companies like theirs who succeeded
+- Objection pre-handling — common pushback they'll face internally
+
+**Remove or minimize:**
+- Deep technical or financial detail
+- Anything that requires context they can't relay
+
+**Adjust tone:** Empowering, equipping. Make them look smart to their boss.
+
+---
+
+## Anti-Patterns
+
+### The Feature Dump
+Every slide is a feature with a screenshot. No story, no "so what," no connection to the buyer's world. Reps click through it; prospects tune out.
+
+### The Wall of Text
+Slides with 200+ words. Nobody reads them during a presentation. If the slide requires reading, it belongs in a leave-behind.
+
+### The Missing Story Arc
+Slides exist in isolation — no narrative flow from problem to solution to proof. The deck feels like a brochure, not a conversation.
+
+### The Generic Screenshot
+Product screenshots without callouts, annotations, or context. The prospect can't tell what they're looking at or why it matters.
+
+### The Premature Demo
+Jumping to product features before establishing the problem. The buyer has no frame of reference for why your features matter.
+
+### The Kitchen Sink
+Trying to address every persona, every use case, every feature in one deck. The result is a 40-slide monster that nobody wants to sit through.