@issuegraph/viewer 0.3.0 → 0.9.1

package/dist/projections/graph.js

@@ -14,14 +14,15 @@
  * so and offers the next move instead of drawing a hairball.
  */
 import { edgeIdentity } from '@issuegraph/core';
-import { clustersOf } from "../clusters.js";
+import { clusterReach, clusterReachLabel, clustersOf } from "../clusters.js";
 import { element, svg } from "../element.js";
-import { edgeGeometry, connectorPath, enclosureBounds, fitLabel, layoutGraph, } from "../layout.js";
-import { emptyState, legend, slotLabel, slotTitle, station, stationFill, stationsOf, atStations, caveatText, hostHeader, nowRows, } from "../parts.js";
+import { edgeGeometry, layoutGraph, } from "../layout.js";
+import { edgeMarkSpecs } from "../marks.js";
+import { adoptionNote, atStations, cardBlocks, caveatBadges, conditionKind, conditionNotice, footerLabels, nowRows, caveatText, edgeBadgeList, emptyState, evidenceBadge, hostHeader, statesItsOwnCause, identity, legend, notReadyBadge, priorityBadge, slotLabel, slotPosition, stationFill, stationsOf, unitBlock, } from "../parts.js";
 import { resolveFocusKey } from "../scene.js";
 import { resolveTheme } from "../theme.js";
 import { dashArrayFor, treatmentFor } from "../vocabulary.js";
-import { excludedRow, isFooterSlot } from "./linear.js";
+import { asideRow, excludedRow, footerHeading, footerRow, isFooterSlot, slotRow, } from "./linear.js";
 /**
  * The node budget, from the design's scale table. Above the first threshold the
  * canvas shows component capsules; above the second, clusters only.
@@ -127,241 +128,237 @@ function edgePaths(edge, geometry, theme) {
     return [svg('path', base)];
 }
 /**
- * One node on the canvas.
+ * One node, drawn as an HTML card positioned on the coordinates the layout gave
+ * it.
  *
- * A NODE THE SCENE PUBLISHES AS A NAVIGATION TARGET HAS TO BE FOCUSABLE. The
- * rail draws only the ranked spine slots, so a tracker-held slot, a duplicate
- * and every gutter node exist ONLY as this group — and an SVG group with no
- * `tabindex` cannot take focus, so navigating to one called `focus()` on
- * nothing and the visible tab stop vanished.
+ * A CARD, NOT A LABELLED RECTANGLE, and that is the change this pass exists to
+ * make. Drawing a node's text in SVG means the text neither wraps nor clips, so
+ * every title had to be run through a width fit and came out truncated — the
+ * "Retype the ca…" the issue names. §16b's node is three lines deep: a title
+ * that wraps, an identity, and a badge row, and none of that is expressible as
+ * one centred `<text>`.
  *
- * `railed` names the keys the rail already draws, so exactly one element per
- * key is tabbable; a second tab stop for the same issue would be worse than
- * none. A focusable element also needs a name, hence `role`/`aria-label`.
+ * IT ALSO SETTLES WHERE FOCUS LIVES. There used to be two kinds of node — a
+ * rail row for a ranked slot and an SVG group for everything else — and three
+ * rounds of review found the same class of defect at the seam between them: a
+ * key published as a navigation target with no focusable element behind it. One
+ * kind of node cannot have that seam.
  */
-function nodeShape(document, layout, key, options, theme, navigable) {
+function nodeCard(document, layout, key, options, focused) {
     const box = layout.nodes.get(key);
     if (box === undefined)
         return null;
     const issue = document.byKey.get(key);
-    const selected = options.selected === key;
-    const ownsTabStop = navigable.keys.includes(key) && !navigable.railed.has(key);
-    const full = issue?.title ?? key;
-    const drawn = fitLabel(theme, full, box.width);
-    // A HOLD THE RAIL DOES NOT CARRY HAS TO BE CARRIED HERE. The rail draws only
-    // the non-footer slots, so a tracker-held slot is filtered out of it — and the
-    // reason last round put on the rail row therefore never reached the graph at
-    // all for exactly those slots, while `ViewerHold` says the viewer renders the
-    // reason verbatim. Measured on the fixture: `claimed by another run` appeared
-    // nowhere in graph markup.
-    // I DEFERRED THIS ONCE ON A REASON THAT WAS WRONG, and it is worth recording:
-    // I said `nodeShape` "takes a key and an issue and knows nothing about slots",
-    // so carrying the reason would be a signature change touching every node. It
-    // takes the whole `document`, and the slots are on it. There was no signature
-    // change to make. See issue #41.
-    // ONLY FOR A NODE THE RAIL DOES NOT LABEL — a railed slot already carries its
-    // reason on its row, and repeating it here would announce the same sentence
-    // twice for one slot.
-    // AND THE HOST'S CAVEATS, on the same terms: a gutter or footer node is the
-    // only mark this projection draws for its issue, so a preview-only note or a
-    // disagreement that the linear and tree rows print would otherwise be absent
-    // from the graph entirely for exactly the issues that have no rail row.
-    const caveats = navigable.railed.has(key) ? '' : caveatText(issue);
-    const heldBecause = navigable.railed.has(key)
-        ? ''
-        : [
-            ...document.order.slots
-                .filter((slot) => slot.lead === key || slot.members.includes(key))
-                .flatMap((slot) => slot.holds.map((hold) => hold.reason)),
-            ...(caveats === '' ? [] : [caveats]),
-        ].join(' · ');
-    // THE POINTER MUST NOT NAME AN IDENTITY THE KEYBOARD CANNOT REACH. A together
-    // unit is ONE station with one focus key, so its non-lead members are absent
-    // from `navigable` deliberately — and this published each of them as its own
-    // `data-ig-key` anyway. Measured on the fixture: clicking `104` emitted `104`,
-    // selected `104`, and threw focus to `102` — not even the unit that was
-    // clicked, because `resolveFocusKey` found neither the selection nor the
-    // requested key in the order and fell back to its first entry. No keyboard can
-    // produce that state.
-    // ROUTED TO THE STATION, NOT MADE A STATION. Giving the partner its own focus
-    // key is the other repair codex offered and it is the one round ten already
-    // rejected: it splits the unit into two stations, which `navigation.test.ts`
-    // forbids in as many words. So the member keeps its node and loses only its
-    // FOCUS identity, which it never legitimately had.
-    // `GROUP_ATTRIBUTE` IS EXACTLY THIS CHANNEL — the enclosure and the connector
-    // already answer a pointer with their unit's lead through it, and a member's
-    // node is the same question about the same unit. `keyAt` reads it as the
-    // fallback the focus index never sees.
-    // A KEY NO SLOT REPRESENTS FALLS BACK TO ITSELF, which is no worse than what
-    // it published before; the orphan pass above is what makes such a key
-    // navigable, and the invariant test is what proves it did.
-    const published = navigable.keys.includes(key);
-    const station = document.order.slots.find((slot) => slot.members.includes(key))?.lead ?? key;
-    return svg('g', {
-        class: 'ig-node-group',
-        'data-ig-key': published ? key : null,
-        'data-ig-group': published ? null : station,
-        'data-column': box.column,
-        'aria-current': selected ? 'true' : 'false',
-        role: ownsTabStop ? 'img' : null,
-        // THE REASON RIDES THE NAME WHEN THERE IS ONE, on the same channels the
-        // rail row uses, so one hold reads the same whichever surface drew it.
-        'aria-label': ownsTabStop
-            ? heldBecause === ''
-                ? `${full} — ${key}`
-                : `${full} — ${key} — ${heldBecause}`
-            : null,
-        tabindex: ownsTabStop ? (navigable.focused === key ? 0 : -1) : null,
+    const slot = document.order.slots.find((candidate) => candidate.lead === key);
+    const members = layout.slotMembers.get(key) ?? [key];
+    const exclusion = document.order.excluded.find((candidate) => candidate.key === key);
+    const caveats = caveatText(issue);
+    const heldBecause = [
+        ...(slot?.holds ?? []).map((hold) => hold.reason),
+        ...(caveats === '' ? [] : [caveats]),
+        ...(exclusion === undefined
+            ? []
+            : [`${treatmentFor('duplicate-of').label} ${exclusion.canonical} — never worked`]),
+    ].join(' · ');
+    // RENDERED FROM THE CARD'S OWN DESCRIPTION, which is also what the layout
+    // counted this card's height from — see `CardBlock`. Built from a second
+    // reading of what the card should hold, four blocks in a row were added to
+    // the drawing and not to the count, and every one of them overran the box the
+    // arcs were anchored to.
+    const drawn = cardBlocks(document, key, members, box.column === 'spine', box.now === true).map((block) => cardMark(document, block, key, members, slot));
+    const label = [
+        slot === undefined ? (issue?.title ?? key) : slotLabel(document, slot),
+        heldBecause === '' ? null : heldBecause,
+    ]
+        .filter((part) => part !== null)
+        .join(' — ');
+    return element('li', {
+        class: 'ig-rail-row',
+        'data-ig-key': key,
+        'aria-current': options.selected === key ? 'true' : 'false',
+        'aria-label': label,
+        title: heldBecause === '' ? null : heldBecause,
+        tabindex: focused === key ? 0 : -1,
+        // Positioned from the layout, not from the flow, so a card sits where its
+        // edges terminate however the theme scales the geometry.
+        style: `--ig-row-x:${String(box.x)}px;--ig-row-y:${String(box.y)}px;--ig-row-w:${String(box.width)}px;--ig-row-h:${String(box.height)}px`,
     }, [
-        // AND ON THE POINTER CHANNEL, which is also the only one left for a node
-        // that owns no tab stop and therefore carries no `aria-label` at all.
-        // First child, because that is where SVG looks for `<title>`.
-        heldBecause === '' ? null : svg('title', {}, [`${full} — ${heldBecause}`]),
-        svg('rect', {
-            class: 'ig-node',
+        element('div', {
+            class: 'ig-card',
+            'data-column': box.column,
             'data-held': box.held ? 'true' : 'false',
-            x: box.x,
-            y: box.y,
-            width: box.width,
-            height: box.height,
-            rx: theme.metrics['--ig-radius'],
-        }),
-        // A node is labelled by its RAIL ROW when it has one, so labelling it
-        // here too would print the title twice — once selectable, once not. But
-        // the rail draws only the ranked slots, and keying this on the COLUMN
-        // rather than on the rail left a tracker-held slot as a blank rectangle:
-        // no title, no hold reason, nothing. The question is whether this key is
-        // railed, not which column it sits in.
-        navigable.railed.has(key)
-            ? null
-            : svg('text', {
-                class: 'ig-node-label',
-                x: box.x + theme.metrics['--ig-space'],
-                // `dominant-baseline` centres the glyphs on the line rather than
-                // a remembered offset, so the label stays centred at any scale.
-                y: box.y + box.height / 2,
-                'dominant-baseline': 'middle',
-            }, [
-                // THE FULL TITLE IS NOT LOST WHEN IT DOES NOT FIT — and it has to
-                // be a CHILD ELEMENT to do that job. This was written as a `title`
-                // ATTRIBUTE, which SVG ignores entirely: no tooltip, no accessible
-                // description, nothing. The markup contained the string, so a test
-                // asserting the full title was "somewhere in the markup" passed
-                // while a reader hovering the shortened label recovered nothing.
-                // FIRST CHILD, because that is where SVG looks for it, and only on
-                // truncation — an untruncated label already reads in full, and a
-                // `<title>` echoing it would announce it twice.
-                // A railed node never reaches here at all: the rail row is its
-                // label, and its own CSS ellipsis handles the same overflow.
-                drawn === full ? null : svg('title', {}, [full]),
-                drawn,
-            ]),
+            'data-now': box.now === true ? 'true' : 'false',
+            'data-unit': members.length > 1 ? 'true' : 'false',
+            'data-exclusion': exclusion === undefined ? null : 'true',
+        }, drawn),
     ]);
 }
+/** One described block, drawn. The other half of `cardBlocks`. */
+function cardMark(document, block, key, members, slot) {
+    switch (block.kind) {
+        case 'banner':
+            return element('div', { class: 'ig-unit-mark' }, [
+                element('span', { class: block.mark === 'now' ? 'ig-now-mark' : 'ig-unit-pill' }, [block.mark]),
+                block.note === '' ? null : element('span', { class: 'ig-unit-note' }, [block.note]),
+            ]);
+        case 'head': {
+            const issue = document.byKey.get(block.key);
+            return element('div', { class: 'ig-row-head' }, [
+                element('span', { class: 'ig-title' }, [issue?.title ?? block.key]),
+                issue === undefined ? null : identity(issue),
+            ]);
+        }
+        case 'unit':
+            // Through `unitBlock`, so the enclosure and its deep links are the ones
+            // the list draws rather than a second spelling of them.
+            return slot === undefined
+                ? element('div', { class: 'ig-row-head' }, [])
+                : (unitBlock(document, slot) ?? element('div', { class: 'ig-row-head' }, []));
+        case 'badges':
+            // THE BADGE ROW IS THE SAME ONE THE LIST DRAWS, which is what makes the
+            // two projections one grammar rather than two spellings. A gutter card
+            // carries it too: it is the only mark this projection draws for its
+            // issue, so a relation left off it is one the graph reader never sees.
+            return element('div', { class: 'ig-badges' }, 
+            // FROM THE SAME BUILDERS `badgeTexts` READS, so what the layout packed
+            // and what the card draws are one list of chips rather than two that
+            // can differ by one.
+            [
+                priorityBadge(document.byKey.get(key)?.provenance),
+                evidenceBadge(document.byKey.get(key)),
+                slot === undefined ? null : notReadyBadge(slot),
+                ...caveatBadges(document.byKey.get(key)),
+                ...edgeBadgeList(document, members),
+            ].filter((badge) => badge !== null));
+        case 'note':
+            // A SPINE CARD KEEPS ITS SENTENCES ON THE TOOLTIP, because the list
+            // projection prints them and §16b's spine card draws a chip. A gutter card
+            // is the only mark this projection makes for its issue, so its sentence
+            // has nowhere else to be — and §16b prints it there.
+            return element('p', { class: 'ig-hold', 'data-family': 'tracker' }, [
+                element('span', {}, [block.text]),
+            ]);
+    }
+}
 /**
- * The spine's ranks and readiness stations, drawn as HTML ON the canvas.
+ * The spine: one line, and one station per card on it.
  *
- * Text in SVG is not selectable, not reflowable and announces poorly, so the
- * spine's rows stay HTML — but they are the labels FOR the spine nodes, and
- * emitting them as a sibling block put them above the drawing instead of on it.
- * Ranks and stations then described a picture the reader had to hold in their
- * head, which is the opposite of the design's claim that the spine IS the
- * order.
- *
- * So each row is positioned at the coordinates the LAYOUT computed for its own
- * node — same source of truth as every edge endpoint. Hand-authoring these
- * against remembered positions is the failure mode the design's implementation
- * note names; the numbers ride custom properties so the theme still owns them.
+ * THE LINE IS THE POINT. §16c's whole argument for this layout is that sequence
+ * gets a channel of its own — vertical position on a single line — so that
+ * nothing has to encode sequence and dependency at once. Without the line drawn
+ * there is no single line to read down, and the picture degrades into the
+ * column of rectangles the alternatives were rejected for.
  */
+function spineStations(document, layout, theme) {
+    const size = theme.metrics['--ig-station-box'];
+    const stations = [];
+    for (const key of layout.spineOrder) {
+        const box = layout.nodes.get(key);
+        if (box === undefined)
+            continue;
+        const slot = document.order.slots.find((candidate) => candidate.lead === key);
+        const fill = slot === undefined ? 'filled' : stationFill(slot);
+        // A serialize hold waits on a PEER rather than on a rank above it, and the
+        // frame colours that station differently for exactly that reason.
+        const waiting = slot?.holds.some((hold) => hold.code === 'serialized') === true;
+        stations.push(element('span', {
+            class: 'ig-spine-station',
+            'data-fill': box.now === true ? 'filled' : fill,
+            'data-wait': waiting ? 'serialize' : null,
+            role: 'img',
+            // THE SAME TWO-FIELD PHRASE THE ROW SPEAKS — `slotPosition`, not a
+            // second reading of `rank`. Inferring held from a missing rank here
+            // dropped the word held from a held-but-ranked station exactly as it
+            // did from the row's own name; see `slotPosition`.
+            'aria-label': box.now === true
+                ? 'working now'
+                : slot === undefined
+                    ? 'held, no rank'
+                    : slotPosition(slot),
+            style: `--ig-station-x:${String(box.x - theme.metrics['--ig-space'] - size)}px;--ig-station-y:${String(box.y + theme.metrics['--ig-space'])}px`,
+        }, [box.now === true ? '▸' : slot?.rank === null || slot === undefined ? '—' : String(slot.rank)]));
+    }
+    return stations;
+}
+/** The three column headings, set at the x of the column each names. */
+function columnHeads(layout) {
+    const heads = [
+        ['left', 'Explains the order'],
+        ['spine', 'The work order ↓'],
+        ['right', 'Not worked'],
+    ];
+    const drawn = new Set();
+    for (const box of layout.nodes.values())
+        drawn.add(box.column);
+    return heads
+        .filter(([column]) => drawn.has(column))
+        .map(([column, text]) => element('span', {
+        class: 'ig-column-head',
+        'data-column': column,
+        style: `--ig-col-x:${String(layout.columnX[column])}px`,
+    }, [text]));
+}
 /**
- * What the rail draws — ONE rule, because two callers read it.
+ * What the ORDER UI draws when the canvas will not.
  *
- * `spineRail` renders these rows and the focus index has to publish exactly the
- * same set, or the projection draws a keyed row nothing can reach. That is not
- * hypothetical: widening the rail for the refusal without widening the index
- * left the footer slot and the exclusion drawn with `data-ig-key` and absent
- * from `navigable` — the identical defect the canvas had two rounds ago,
- * reintroduced by fixing its sibling. Deriving both from here is what makes the
- * two provably agree rather than agree by inspection.
+ * A refusal's list is the whole order UI — the refusal's own last sentence
+ * promises "the order list is complete at any size" — so it carries the footer
+ * slots and the exclusions the canvas would otherwise have drawn. With a
+ * canvas, every one of those is a card, so the list carries nothing and this
+ * answers empty.
  *
- * `positioned` is the refusal signal inverted: with a canvas, a footer slot is
- * drawn as a canvas node and an exclusion sits off the spine entirely, so the
- * rail carries neither. Without one, the rail IS the order.
+ * ONE RULE, TWO READERS. This decides what renders AND what the focus index
+ * publishes; declaring them separately is how a keyed row with nothing to focus
+ * kept coming back.
  */
-function railContents(document, positioned) {
-    return positioned
-        ? { slots: document.order.slots.filter((slot) => !isFooterSlot(slot)), excluded: [] }
-        : { slots: document.order.slots, excluded: document.order.excluded };
+function refusalContents(document, refused) {
+    return refused
+        ? { slots: document.order.slots, excluded: document.order.excluded }
+        : { slots: [], excluded: [] };
 }
-function spineRail(document, layout, options, focused, positioned) {
-    // A REFUSAL'S RAIL IS THE WHOLE ORDER UI, so it must carry what the canvas
-    // would otherwise have drawn. `positioned` is exactly the refusal signal — the
-    // only `false` call site is the refusal arm — and when the canvas is absent, a
-    // footer slot has nothing to draw it and an exclusion has no row at all.
-    // Measured on a refused document: the tracker-held slot's title, its hold
-    // reason, and the excluded key were all absent from the markup, while the
-    // refusal's own text said "The order list is complete at any size". That claim
-    // was written into this file and it was false.
-    // FILTERED ONLY WHEN THE CANVAS DRAWS THEM. In ordinary graph mode a footer
-    // slot IS drawn, as a canvas node, so keeping it out of the rail is what stops
-    // one slot appearing twice — the filter is right there and wrong here.
-    const { slots, excluded } = railContents(document, positioned);
-    return element('ol', 
-    // A plain list for the reason `linear.ts` gives: an interactive descendant
-    // may not live inside `role="option"`.
-    // WHEN THERE IS NO CANVAS THERE IS NOTHING TO SIT ON. A refusal draws no
-    // spine nodes, so the rail returns to ordinary flow rather than positioning
-    // itself against coordinates nothing rendered.
-    { class: positioned ? 'ig-list ig-rail' : 'ig-list', 'aria-label': 'work order' }, [
-        ...slots.map((slot) => {
-            const box = layout.nodes.get(slot.lead);
-            // THE REASON A SLOT IS HELD IS PART OF WHAT THIS ROW MEANS. `ViewerHold`
-            // says the viewer renders the reason verbatim, and the linear projection
-            // does — this one rendered rank, station and title, so a graph reader was
-            // told THAT a slot is held and never WHY. `data-held` styles the row, so
-            // the holding was visible and the host's sentence was not, on either the
-            // visible or the accessible channel.
-            // ON THE LABEL AND THE TOOLTIP, NOT AS A BLOCK IN THE ROW. This row is
-            // positioned onto its node's box — `--ig-row-h` IS the node height — so a
-            // paragraph per hold would overflow geometry the layout computed for a
-            // node, which is a worse defect than the one being fixed. `title` plus
-            // `aria-label` is how this package already carries text that cannot take
-            // space (see the edge badges): sighted readers hover, screen readers hear
-            // it, and the layout is untouched.
-            // ONLY HERE, not in `slotLabel`. That helper is shared with the linear
-            // projection, which renders the same holds as visible paragraphs — adding
-            // them there would announce every linear hold twice.
-            // THE HOST'S CAVEATS RIDE THE SAME CHANNEL as the holds, for the same
-            // reason: this row has the geometry of a node and no room for a block.
-            const caveats = caveatText(document.byKey.get(slot.lead));
-            const heldBecause = [...slot.holds.map((hold) => hold.reason), ...(caveats === '' ? [] : [caveats])].join(' · ');
-            return element('li', {
-                class: positioned ? 'ig-slot ig-rail-row' : 'ig-slot',
-                'data-ig-key': slot.lead,
-                'data-held': slot.ready ? 'false' : 'true',
-                'aria-current': options.selected === slot.lead ? 'true' : 'false',
-                'aria-label': heldBecause === ''
-                    ? slotLabel(document, slot)
-                    : `${slotLabel(document, slot)} — ${heldBecause}`,
-                title: heldBecause === '' ? null : heldBecause,
-                tabindex: focused === slot.lead ? 0 : -1,
-                // Positioned from the layout, not from the flow, so a row sits on the
-                // node it names however the theme scales the geometry.
-                style: positioned && box !== undefined
-                    ? `--ig-row-x:${String(box.x)}px;--ig-row-y:${String(box.y)}px;--ig-row-w:${String(box.width)}px;--ig-row-h:${String(box.height)}px`
-                    : null,
-            }, [
-                element('span', { class: 'ig-rank', 'data-held': slot.ready ? 'false' : 'true', 'aria-hidden': 'true' }, [slot.rank === null ? '—' : String(slot.rank)]),
-                station(stationFill(slot)),
-                element('span', { class: 'ig-title' }, [slotTitle(document, slot)]),
-            ]);
-        }),
-        // AND THE EXCLUSIONS, on the same terms: they have no canvas node in any
-        // mode, so ordinary graph mode simply never showed them — which is correct
-        // there, because the spine rail sits ON the canvas and an exclusion is not
-        // on it. In a refusal there is no canvas, the rail is the entire order, and
-        // an exclusion left out is a row of the order that is missing.
-        ...excluded.map((exclusion) => excludedRow(document, exclusion.key, exclusion.canonical, { ...options, focused })),
+/**
+ * The order as a list, for a document the canvas refuses.
+ *
+ * IT IS THE LINEAR PROJECTION'S OWN ROW, not a second spelling of it. The rail
+ * that shipped had its own three-child row — rank, station, title — which drew
+ * neither the badges nor the provenance the list draws, so a refused document
+ * silently lost the explanation the unrefused one carried.
+ */
+function refusalOrder(document, options, focused) {
+    const { slots, excluded } = refusalContents(document, true);
+    const withFocus = { ...options, focused };
+    return element('ol', { class: 'ig-list', 'aria-label': 'work order' }, [
+        ...slots.map((slot) => slotRow(document, slot, withFocus, true)),
+        ...excluded.map((exclusion) => excludedRow(document, exclusion.key, exclusion.canonical, withFocus)),
+    ]);
+}
+/**
+ * One component, as §16's refusal presents it.
+ *
+ * NOT A CONTROL, and that is settled rather than pending — `refusal`'s own
+ * note below records why: this package does not narrow, so a control here can
+ * never complete the action it advertises. Frame `17f`'s "click to enter one"
+ * is layer 2's to draw, on the layer that can.
+ *
+ * What it does carry is the same reach the editor's capsule carries, from the
+ * same function, so one component is never described two ways on one screen.
+ */
+function capsuleSpec(cluster) {
+    const reach = clusterReach(cluster);
+    return element('li', { class: 'ig-capsule' }, [
+        element('span', { class: 'ig-count' }, [`${String(cluster.members.length)} issues`]),
+        // THE BLOCKING COUNT STAYS, unlike on §17f's card. That rule is the frame's,
+        // and the frame's constraint is a two-column card with ONE slot beside the
+        // count; this capsule is a flex row with room for both, and dropping the
+        // number would leave a §16 reader unable to tell a two-edge cycle component
+        // from a two-hundred-edge one. "§16 ships unchanged" is the standing rule;
+        // the only thing that changes here is the depth, which was untrue.
+        element('span', { class: 'ig-count' }, [`${String(cluster.blockedByEdges)} blocking`]),
+        reach.kind === 'cyclic'
+            ? element('span', { class: 'ig-badge', 'data-edge': 'blocked-by' }, ['cycle'])
+            : null,
+        element('span', { class: 'ig-count' }, [clusterReachLabel(reach)]),
+        element('span', { class: 'ig-id' }, [cluster.members.slice(0, 3).join(', ')]),
     ]);
 }
 /**
@@ -413,15 +410,7 @@ function refusal(document, layout, nodeCount, mode) {
     const omitted = clusters.length - shown.length;
     return element('section', { class: 'ig-refusal', role: 'note' }, [
         element('p', {}, [heading]),
-        element('ol', { class: 'ig-list', 'aria-label': 'connected components' }, shown.map((cluster) => element('li', { class: 'ig-capsule' }, [
-            element('span', { class: 'ig-count' }, [`${String(cluster.members.length)} issues`]),
-            element('span', { class: 'ig-count' }, [`${String(cluster.blockedByEdges)} blocking`]),
-            element('span', { class: 'ig-count' }, [`depth ${String(cluster.chainDepth)}`]),
-            cluster.hasCycle
-                ? element('span', { class: 'ig-badge', 'data-edge': 'blocked-by' }, ['cycle'])
-                : null,
-            element('span', { class: 'ig-id' }, [cluster.members.slice(0, 3).join(', ')]),
-        ]))),
+        element('ol', { class: 'ig-list', 'aria-label': 'connected components' }, shown.map((cluster) => capsuleSpec(cluster))),
         omitted > 0
             ? element('p', { class: 'ig-refusal-omitted' }, [
                 `${String(omitted)} further ${omitted === 1 ? 'component is' : 'components are'} not listed; ${String(clusters.length)} were found in total.`,
@@ -432,12 +421,71 @@ function refusal(document, layout, nodeCount, mode) {
         ]),
     ]);
 }
+/**
+ * The runner-held slots the canvas draws nowhere, as §16a's footer group.
+ *
+ * THE GRAPH AND THE LIST MUST SHOW THE SAME ISSUES. A projection change is a
+ * change of representation, never of subject — so an issue the list carries in
+ * its footer cannot simply be absent from the graph, whatever the canvas has
+ * room for.
+ */
+function footerGroup(document, layout, options, focused) {
+    const entries = footerKeys(document, layout, { ...options, focused });
+    if (entries.length === 0)
+        return null;
+    const slots = document.order.slots.filter((slot) => layout.footer.includes(slot.lead));
+    const excluded = document.order.excluded.filter((exclusion) => layout.footer.includes(exclusion.key));
+    // WHAT THIS GROUP ACTUALLY HOLDS. In the column it also holds every gutter
+    // endpoint the compact picture does not draw — an ordinary open blocker, say,
+    // which no runner holds and which is worked like anything else — so a heading
+    // that named only the runner and the never-worked said something untrue about
+    // them.
+    const undrawn = entries.length > slots.length + excluded.length;
+    const labels = footerLabels(slots);
+    return element('section', { class: 'ig-footer' }, [
+        element('div', { class: 'ig-footer-head' }, [
+            element('p', { class: 'ig-footer-title' }, [
+                footerHeading(entries.length, {
+                    runner: slots.length > 0,
+                    neverWorked: excluded.length > 0,
+                    undrawn,
+                }),
+            ]),
+            labels === '' ? null : element('span', { class: 'ig-footer-labels' }, [labels]),
+        ]),
+        element('ol', { class: 'ig-list', 'aria-label': 'outside the order' }, entries),
+    ]);
+}
+/**
+ * A row for EVERY key the canvas drew nowhere, in the layout's own order.
+ *
+ * DERIVED FROM `layout.footer` AND NOTHING ELSE, which is the whole correction.
+ * A group built from `order.slots` covered the runner-held ones; adding
+ * `order.excluded` covered the duplicates; and an ordinary off-order
+ * relationship endpoint — an open blocker, a closed split origin — is neither,
+ * so in compact mode, where the gutters are not drawn, it was in
+ * `layout.footer` and rendered by nothing at all. Two partial rules chasing one
+ * set is how the key that belongs to neither goes missing, so there is one
+ * rule: the layout says what it did not draw, and every one of those gets a row.
+ */
+function footerKeys(document, layout, options) {
+    return layout.footer.map((key) => {
+        const slot = document.order.slots.find((candidate) => candidate.lead === key);
+        if (slot !== undefined)
+            return footerRow(document, slot, options);
+        const exclusion = document.order.excluded.find((candidate) => candidate.key === key);
+        if (exclusion !== undefined) {
+            return excludedRow(document, key, exclusion.canonical, options);
+        }
+        return asideRow(document, key, options);
+    });
+}
 export function graphScene(document, rawOptions = {}) {
     // See `linearScene` — the same rule, applied before the canvas is laid out.
     const stations = stationsOf(document);
     const options = atStations(rawOptions, stations);
     const theme = resolveTheme(options.theme);
-    const layout = layoutGraph(document, theme);
+    const layout = layoutGraph(document, theme, options.compact === true);
     const nodeCount = layout.nodes.size;
     const inline = document.order.slots.filter((slot) => !isFooterSlot(slot));
     const footerSlots = document.order.slots.filter(isFooterSlot);
@@ -455,24 +503,44 @@ export function graphScene(document, rawOptions = {}) {
     // and draws NOTHING keyed when it refuses or is empty. Everything downstream
     // is a subset of that, so "every published target is focusable" holds by
     // construction rather than by remembering.
-    const refused = nodeCount === 0 || nodeCount > GRAPH_NODE_BUDGET;
-    // FROM THE SAME RULE THE RAIL RENDERS FROM — see `railContents`. Hard-coding
-    // `inline` here was correct only while the rail rendered exactly `inline`, and
-    // it silently stopped being correct the moment the refusal's rail widened.
-    const shown = railContents(document, !refused);
+    // AN EMPTY NODE MAP IS NOT AN EMPTY PANEL. In the column the gutters are not
+    // drawn, so a document whose issues are all off the order — relationships and
+    // no ranked or running station — lays out NOTHING and puts every one of them
+    // in `layout.footer`. Read as a refusal, that said "no issue in this document
+    // declares a relationship" about a document full of them AND suppressed the
+    // footer group that was holding all of them, so the panel came back blank.
+    // The question is whether this scene draws anything, and the footer draws.
+    const drawsNothing = nodeCount === 0 && layout.footer.length === 0;
+    const refused = drawsNothing || nodeCount > GRAPH_NODE_BUDGET;
+    // FROM THE SAME RULE THE LIST RENDERS FROM — see `refusalContents`. With a
+    // canvas every node is a card and the card owns the tab stop; without one,
+    // the list is the whole order UI and its rows do.
+    const shown = refusalContents(document, refused);
     const railed = new Set([
         ...shown.slots.map((slot) => slot.lead),
         ...shown.excluded.map((exclusion) => exclusion.key),
     ]);
+    // THE FOOTER GROUP IS FOCUSABLE TOO, and it is off the canvas: its rows are
+    // drawn beneath the stage, so a set derived from the laid-out nodes alone
+    // published nothing for them and a keyboard could not reach half the issues
+    // the projection draws.
     const focusable = new Set([
         ...railed,
-        ...(refused ? [] : layout.nodes.keys()),
+        ...(refused ? [] : [...layout.nodes.keys(), ...layout.footer]),
     ]);
+    // THE SPINE AS THE LAYOUT ORDERED IT, FIRST. §16e fixes that the graph walks
+    // its stations in RANK order, and the layout puts the running job at the top
+    // — above rank 1, which is where §16b draws it. Rebuilding the order from the
+    // slots instead reached that card at its old rank, or near the end when it
+    // held no slot, so the keyboard walked the drawing non-monotonically: down
+    // the spine, back up to the top, on again.
+    const spineFirst = refused ? [] : [...layout.spineOrder];
     const focusOrder = [
+        ...spineFirst,
         ...inline.map((slot) => slot.lead),
         ...footerSlots.map((slot) => slot.lead),
         ...document.order.excluded.map((exclusion) => exclusion.key),
-    ].filter((key) => focusable.has(key));
+    ].filter((key, index, all) => focusable.has(key) && all.indexOf(key) === index);
     // ── the lateral axis: ONLY PAIRS WHOSE REVERSE HOLDS ──────────────────────
     //
     // A one-way mapping is not a traversal — focus went out to a gutter node and
@@ -496,6 +564,14 @@ export function graphScene(document, rawOptions = {}) {
     for (const slot of document.order.slots) {
         if (!focusable.has(slot.lead))
             continue;
+        // FROM THE SPINE OUTWARD, and only from there. §16f gives the lateral keys
+        // one job: leave the sequence for the gutter card that explains this rank,
+        // and come back. A gutter card linked to ANOTHER gutter card is a step that
+        // never touches the order at all — and it consumed the one neighbour-per-
+        // side each node has, so the reverse link back to the spine could not be
+        // written and the traversal stopped being reversible.
+        if (layout.nodes.get(slot.lead)?.column !== 'spine')
+            continue;
         // Every MEMBER's edges, not just the lead's: a together unit is one station
         // with one focus key, so a gutter neighbour reachable only through its
         // second member would otherwise be unreachable by keyboard entirely.
@@ -535,7 +611,11 @@ export function graphScene(document, rawOptions = {}) {
         for (const member of slot.members)
             represented.add(member);
     if (!refused) {
-        for (const key of layout.nodes.keys()) {
+        // THE FOOTER GROUP'S KEYS TOO. Its rows are drawn beneath the stage rather
+        // than on a column, so a set derived from the laid-out nodes alone reached
+        // none of them — and in compact mode, where the gutters are not drawn, that
+        // is every off-order endpoint the panel still lists.
+        for (const key of [...layout.nodes.keys(), ...layout.footer]) {
             if (!focusOrder.includes(key) && !lateral.has(key) && !represented.has(key))
                 focusOrder.push(key);
         }
@@ -562,9 +642,22 @@ export function graphScene(document, rawOptions = {}) {
     };
     const diagnostics = [];
     let canvas;
-    if (nodeCount === 0) {
+    if (statesItsOwnCause(document) && (drawsNothing || nodeCount === 0)) {
+        // THE HOST'S NOTICE IS THE PANEL'S ONE CAUSE STATEMENT — see `linear.ts`.
+        // This arm's sentence is the worse of the two to leave standing: it names
+        // RELATIONSHIPS, so an unreadable index or a running import would be
+        // explained to the reader as a document that declares no edges, which is a
+        // claim about something else entirely and may simply be untrue.
+        canvas = null;
+    }
+    else if (drawsNothing) {
         canvas = emptyState('No issue in this document declares a relationship, so the canvas is empty.');
     }
+    else if (nodeCount === 0) {
+        // Nothing to draw ON the canvas, and a footer group beneath it that is the
+        // whole panel. No stage, no refusal: the group renders in ordinary flow.
+        canvas = emptyState('Nothing in this document is in the order, so the spine is empty.');
+    }
     else if (nodeCount > CLUSTER_ONLY_BUDGET) {
         diagnostics.push(`graph refused: ${String(nodeCount)} nodes is past the cluster-only budget of ${String(CLUSTER_ONLY_BUDGET)}`);
         canvas = refusal(document, layout, nodeCount, 'clusters');
@@ -575,126 +668,174 @@ export function graphScene(document, rawOptions = {}) {
     }
     else {
         const edgeLayers = [];
+        // ONE STATION PER SLOT MEANS ONE BOX PER SLOT, so an edge inside a unit has
+        // both ends on the same card and no arc to draw. It is not lost: the card
+        // lists its members, and the badge row names the relationship, which is the
+        // same treatment the list projection gives it. `edgeGeometry` answers null
+        // for exactly that case, and it resolves a member to its unit's card for
+        // every other — so this loop asks the geometry rather than deciding twice.
         for (const edge of document.edges) {
-            // `together-with` is drawn as an enclosure plus its connector, not as an
-            // arc: it shares a rank rather than ordering anything.
-            if (edge.field === 'together-with')
-                continue;
-            const geometry = edgeGeometry(layout, edge);
+            // No arcs in the column: §16b says they cannot be drawn legibly there,
+            // and an arc drawn illegibly is worse than an arc a reader knows to
+            // expand for. The badge row on every card still names the relationship.
+            if (layout.compact)
+                break;
+            // THE ARROW POINTS AT WHAT IS HELD UP, not at what holds it. §16b draws
+            // every blocking arc arriving on the blocked card, and it is the reading
+            // that answers the question the panel exists for: a reader following an
+            // arrowhead is asking "what is waiting on this", and an arrow into the
+            // blocker answers the question nobody asked. The DECLARATION is untouched
+            // — the identity below is still the field's own orientation, so what a
+            // click reports is the edge as written.
+            const drawn = edge.field === 'blocked-by' ? { field: edge.field, from: edge.to, to: edge.from } : edge;
+            const geometry = edgeGeometry(layout, drawn);
             if (geometry === null)
                 continue;
+            const identity = edgeIdentity(edge.field, edge.from, edge.to);
             edgeLayers.push(...edgePaths(edge, geometry, theme));
-            const marker = terminalMarker(treatmentFor(edge.field).terminal, geometry, edge.field, edgeIdentity(edge.field, edge.from, edge.to), theme);
+            const marker = terminalMarker(treatmentFor(edge.field).terminal, geometry, edge.field, identity, theme);
             if (marker !== null)
                 edgeLayers.push(marker);
-        }
-        // The one declared seam crossing: the connector lives in this layer,
-        // because a click target cannot be added from outside without the viewer
-        // knowing where members are.
-        const enclosures = [];
-        for (const [lead, members] of layout.slotMembers) {
-            const bounds = enclosureBounds(layout, members, theme);
-            if (bounds === null)
-                continue;
-            enclosures.push(
-            // `data-ig-GROUP`, not `data-ig-key`. The enclosure is painted BEFORE
-            // the nodes so it sits behind them, and `mountViewer` indexes the first
-            // element it sees for a key — so sharing the key made keyboard movement
-            // to a canvas-owned lead call `focus()` on this non-tabbable rect
-            // instead of its `<g tabindex="0">`. Decoration does not compete with
-            // the thing it decorates for an identity.
-            svg('rect', {
-                class: 'ig-enclosure',
-                'data-ig-group': lead,
-                'stroke-dasharray': dashArrayFor('enclosure'),
-                x: bounds.x,
-                y: bounds.y,
-                width: bounds.width,
-                height: bounds.height,
-                rx: theme.metrics['--ig-radius'],
-                role: 'img',
-                'aria-label': `${members.join(' and ')} share one rank`,
-            }));
-            const inUnit = new Set(members);
-            for (const edge of document.edges) {
-                // ONE CONNECTOR PER DECLARED EDGE, NOT ONE PER ADJACENT PAIR. Walking
-                // the member list pairwise assumed a group is written as a chain — but
-                // a writer joins one by pointing at ANY existing member (§4.3.7), so
-                // `2 together-with 1` and `3 together-with 1` is an ordinary star. That
-                // walk drew a `2`–`3` connector for a relationship the document does
-                // not contain, so the identity it published resolved to no
-                // `StoredEdge`, while the real `1`–`3` edge got no connector at all.
-                // Reading the edges themselves cannot invent one and cannot miss one.
-                if (edge.field !== 'together-with')
-                    continue;
-                if (!inUnit.has(edge.from) || !inUnit.has(edge.to))
-                    continue;
-                const d = connectorPath(layout, members, edge.from, edge.to, theme);
-                if (d === null)
-                    continue;
-                enclosures.push(svg('path', {
-                    class: 'ig-connector',
-                    fill: 'none',
-                    // THE PAIR'S OWN IDENTITY, NOT THE SLOT'S. Every connector in a
-                    // unit used to carry the lead, so a three-member unit drew two
-                    // marks a pointer could not tell apart and a click on either named
-                    // the unit — the one thing an editor cannot delete, retype or
-                    // report a write against. `edgeIdentity` is the SAME function the
-                    // store derives `StoredEdge.id` with, so what `onSelect` hands the
-                    // host is a key `findEdge` resolves rather than a shape it has to
-                    // be taught.
-                    //
-                    // STILL `data-ig-group`, and that is not an oversight about the
-                    // "addressable via the key scheme" wording. Decoration announces
-                    // itself on this attribute precisely so it stays OUT of the focus
-                    // index — one element per key, or `focus()` lands on a
-                    // non-tabbable mark instead of the node it decorates. `keyAt`
-                    // reads both attributes for POINTER identity, which is the
-                    // question a click asks, so the connector is addressable without
-                    // re-opening that.
-                    'data-ig-group': edgeIdentity(edge.field, edge.from, edge.to),
-                    d,
+            // THE MARKS A CALLER ASKED FOR, LAST, so every one of them sits in front
+            // of the line it decorates rather than under it.
+            //
+            // Keyed on the DECLARED identity, like the terminal above, even though the
+            // geometry was solved from a possibly-swapped `drawn` edge — a caller
+            // holds the edge as written and has no way to know which way this
+            // projection chose to point the arrow.
+            const requested = options.edgeMarks?.get(identity);
+            if (requested !== undefined && requested.length > 0) {
+                const treatment = treatmentFor(edge.field);
+                edgeLayers.push(...edgeMarkSpecs(requested, geometry, theme, identity, {
+                    doubled: treatment.dash === 'double',
+                    // THE KIND'S OWN DASH AND HUE, HANDED OVER RATHER THAN LEFT TO CSS.
+                    // Every mark drops `class`, so `.ig-edge[data-edge=…]` reaches none
+                    // of them — a companion would draw solid beside a dotted line, and a
+                    // chip would take the viewer's body text instead of the
+                    // relationship's colour. Both are channels the type identity rests
+                    // on, lost exactly where a reader is comparing two versions.
+                    dashArray: dashArrayFor(treatment.dash),
+                    hueToken: treatment.hueToken,
                 }));
             }
         }
-        const nodeShapes = [...layout.nodes.keys()]
-            .map((key) => nodeShape(document, layout, key, options, theme, navigable))
-            .filter((node) => node !== null);
+        // THE SPINE ITSELF, painted first so every arc bows off a line that is
+        // already there. It spans the stations and no further: a line running the
+        // full height of the canvas would imply order where the gutters sit.
+        const spine = layout.spineOrder.length === 0
+            ? null
+            : svg('line', {
+                class: 'ig-spine',
+                x1: layout.spineLineX,
+                y1: layout.spineTop,
+                x2: layout.spineLineX,
+                y2: layout.spineBottom,
+            });
         canvas = svg('svg', {
             class: 'ig-canvas',
             viewBox: `0 0 ${String(Math.round(layout.width))} ${String(Math.round(layout.height))}`,
-            // `role="img"` FLATTENS every descendant into a single image, which
-            // would hide the very node roles and labels that make gutter and
-            // held nodes reachable. A container holding separately focusable
-            // semantic children is a group, not a picture.
-            role: 'group',
-            'aria-label': `${String(nodeCount)} issues and ${String(document.edges.length)} relationships`,
-        }, [...enclosures, ...edgeLayers, ...nodeShapes]);
+            // The picture is decoration over an HTML rail that carries every node,
+            // every name and every tab stop, so it announces nothing of its own.
+            // `role="img"` with a label would put a second, flattened description of
+            // the same nodes into the accessibility tree.
+            'aria-hidden': 'true',
+        }, [spine, ...edgeLayers]);
     }
-    const root = element('section', { class: 'ig-viewer ig-graph', 'data-projection': 'graph', 'aria-label': 'issue order and relationships' }, [
-        hostHeader(document),
-        legend(),
-        // ABOVE THE STAGE, NEVER IN THE RAIL. The rail's rows are positioned onto
-        // the layout's node boxes, so an unpositioned row among them would sit on
-        // nothing; the NOW list is ordinary flow, framing the canvas beneath it.
-        nowRows(document),
+    // ONE LIST PER COLUMN, LABELLED THE WAY ITS HEADING IS. Every card in one
+    // list called "work order" told a screen reader that the left gutter's
+    // explanations and the right gutter's never-worked issues are ordered work —
+    // which is the opposite of what those two columns exist to say, and what
+    // their own visible headings say instead.
+    const columns = [
+        ['spine', 'work order'],
+        ['left', 'explains the order'],
+        ['right', 'not worked'],
+    ];
+    const cardLists = refused
+        ? []
+        : columns
+            .map(([column, label]) => {
+            const cards = [...layout.nodes.keys()]
+                .filter((key) => layout.nodes.get(key)?.column === column)
+                .map((key) => nodeCard(document, layout, key, options, navigable.focused))
+                .filter((card) => card !== null);
+            return cards.length === 0
+                ? null
+                : element('ol', { class: 'ig-list', 'aria-label': label }, cards);
+        })
+            .filter((list) => list !== null);
+    const root = element('section', {
+        class: 'ig-viewer ig-graph',
+        'data-projection': 'graph',
+        // Stamped on all three roots rather than on the one that draws rows.
+        // A projection toggle must not silently drop a host's decision, and
+        // the graph carries a footer group of rows of its own. See
+        // `SceneOptions.density`.
+        'data-density': options.density,
+        'data-ig-condition': conditionKind(document, options.chrome),
+        'aria-label': 'issue order and relationships',
+    }, [
+        options.chrome === false
+            ? null
+            : hostHeader(document, {
+                projection: 'graph',
+                compact: layout.compact,
+                switchable: options.switchable === true,
+            }),
+        // ABOVE THE STAGE, which is where this projection's order is drawn — the
+        // same position relative to the order that the list gives it. It is NOT
+        // the list's arrangement: the graph draws its NOW row only when the canvas
+        // refuses (otherwise the running job is a station on the spine), so there
+        // is usually no NOW row here for the notice to sit under, and in the
+        // refused case the band stands in for the spine the notice qualifies.
+        // Gated as chrome, for the reason `conditionNotice` states.
+        conditionNotice(document, options.chrome),
         // ONE STAGE, sized in the layout's own units, so an absolutely-positioned
-        // rail row and an SVG coordinate mean the same thing. A percentage-width
-        // canvas would rescale under the rail and the two would drift apart.
-        // A refusal draws no nodes, so it needs no stage and the rail stays in
+        // card and an SVG coordinate mean the same thing. A percentage-width
+        // canvas would rescale under the cards and the two would drift apart.
+        // A refusal draws no nodes, so it needs no stage and the list stays in
         // ordinary flow — a fixed-height stage would clip it.
-        refused
+        // NO STAGE WITHOUT A NODE TO SIT ON. A stage is sized in the layout's own
+        // units, and a layout with no boxes has none — so a document whose issues
+        // are all in the footer renders its message and its group in ordinary
+        // flow, exactly as a refusal does, without BEING a refusal.
+        refused || nodeCount === 0
             ? canvas
             : element('div', {
                 class: 'ig-stage',
                 style: `--ig-stage-w:${String(Math.round(layout.width))}px;--ig-stage-h:${String(Math.round(layout.height))}px`,
-            }, [canvas, spineRail(document, layout, options, navigable.focused, true)]),
-        refused ? spineRail(document, layout, options, navigable.focused, false) : null,
+            }, [
+                canvas,
+                element('div', { class: 'ig-rail' }, [
+                    ...columnHeads(layout),
+                    ...cardLists,
+                    ...spineStations(document, layout, theme),
+                ]),
+            ]),
+        // THE RUNNING JOB SURVIVES A REFUSAL. A refused canvas draws no station,
+        // so the one issue the panel exists to say is in flight vanished
+        // completely when it held no slot, and was reduced to an ordinary order
+        // row — no phase, no elapsed time — when it did. The band is what §16a
+        // uses where there is no spine to put a station on, and a refusal is
+        // exactly that case.
+        refused ? nowRows(document) : null,
+        refused ? refusalOrder(document, options, navigable.focused) : null,
+        // §16a'S FOOTER GROUP, ON THE GRAPH. A runner-held slot that blocks
+        // nothing on the spine has no column to sit in — it is neither the order
+        // nor an explanation of it — and drawing it on the spine gave it a
+        // position in a sequence it is not part of. So it lands here, in the same
+        // one-line-each group the list draws, which is also what keeps the two
+        // projections showing the same set of issues.
+        refused ? null : footerGroup(document, layout, options, navigable.focused),
         document.isolated.length === 0
             ? null
             : element('p', { class: 'ig-count' }, [
                 `${String(document.isolated.length)} isolated ${document.isolated.length === 1 ? 'issue' : 'issues'} not drawn`,
             ]),
+        legend(),
+        // LAST, because §16h calls it the panel FOOTER and the legend is a footer
+        // bar. Above it, the line was not the last thing on the panel.
+        adoptionNote(document, options.chrome),
     ]);
     return {
         projection: 'graph',