@intlayer/docs 7.5.0 → 7.5.1

package/blog/de/l10n_platform_alternative/phrase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n-Plattform-Alternative zu Phrase
+description: Finden Sie die beste L10n-Plattform-Alternative zu Phrase für Ihre Anforderungen
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Phrase
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - phrase
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Erste Version
+---
+
+# Eine L10n Open-Source-Alternative zu Phrase (TMS)
+
+## Inhaltsverzeichnis
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Übersetzungsmanagement-System
+
+Ein Translation Management System (TMS) ist eine Softwareplattform, die entwickelt wurde, um den Übersetzungs- und Lokalisierungsprozess (L10n) zu automatisieren und zu vereinfachen. Traditionell dient ein TMS als zentraler Hub, an dem Inhalte hochgeladen, organisiert und menschlichen Übersetzern zugewiesen werden. Es verwaltet Workflows, speichert Translation Memories (um zu vermeiden, denselben Satz mehrfach zu übersetzen) und übernimmt die Auslieferung der übersetzten Dateien an Entwickler oder Content-Manager.
+
+Im Wesentlichen war ein TMS historisch die Brücke zwischen dem technischen Code (wo die Strings liegen) und den menschlichen Linguisten (die die Kultur verstehen).
+
+Ein Translation Management System (TMS) ist eine Softwareplattform, die entwickelt wurde, um den Übersetzungs- und Lokalisierungsprozess (L10n) zu automatisieren und zu optimieren. Traditionell fungiert ein TMS als zentrales Hub, in das Inhalte hochgeladen, organisiert und an menschliche Übersetzer zugewiesen werden. Es verwaltet Workflows, speichert Translation Memories (um denselben Satz nicht mehrfach zu übersetzen) und übernimmt die Auslieferung der übersetzten Dateien an Entwickler oder Content-Manager.
+
+Im Kern war ein TMS historisch die Brücke zwischen dem technischen Code (wo die Strings liegen) und den menschlichen Linguisten (die die Kultur verstehen).
+
+# Phrase (ehemals PhraseApp)
+
+Phrase ist ein Schwergewicht im Bereich Enterprise-Localization. Ursprünglich als PhraseApp bekannt, ist es insbesondere nach der Fusion mit Memsource stark gewachsen. Es positioniert sich als umfassende Localization Suite, die für Software-Lokalisierung entwickelt wurde und leistungsstarke API-Funktionen sowie umfangreiche Formatunterstützung bietet.
+
+Phrase ist auf Skalierbarkeit ausgelegt. Es ist die erste Wahl für große Unternehmen, die komplexe Workflows, umfangreiche Translation Memories und strenge Qualitätssicherungsprozesse über viele verschiedene Teams hinweg verwalten müssen. Seine Stärke liegt in der Fähigkeit, "heavy duty" Lokalisierungsaufgaben zu bewältigen und ein All-in-One-Ökosystem sowohl für Software-Strings als auch für Dokumentenübersetzungen bereitzustellen.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer ist hauptsächlich als i18n-Lösung bekannt, integriert aber auch ein Headless-CMS. Im Gegensatz zu Phrase, das als umfangreiche, externe Enterprise-Suite fungiert, agiert Intlayer als eine schlanke, in den Code integrierte Schicht. Es kontrolliert den gesamten Stack — von der Bundling-Schicht bis zur Bereitstellung entfernter Inhalte — und führt so zu einem reibungsloseren und effizienteren Content-Flow für moderne Webanwendungen.
+
+## Warum haben sich die Paradigmen seit AI verändert?
+
+Phrase wurde entwickelt, um die Probleme des letzten Jahrzehnts zu lösen: die Verwaltung riesiger Teams menschlicher Übersetzer und die Standardisierung von Workflows über fragmentierte Unternehmensabteilungen hinweg. Es ist besonders stark in der Workflow-Governance.
+
+Mit dem Aufkommen großer Sprachmodelle (LLMs) haben sich die Paradigmen der Lokalisierung grundlegend verschoben. Die Herausforderung lautet nicht mehr „Wie verwalten wir 50 Übersetzer?“, sondern „Wie validieren wir AI-generierte Inhalte effizient?“
+
+Obwohl Phrase AI-Funktionen integriert hat, sind diese häufig auf eine Legacy-Architektur aufgesetzt, die für menschzentrierte Workflows und sitzbasierte Lizenzen konzipiert wurde. In der modernen Ära wird die Reibung des „pushing to TMS“ und „pulling from TMS“ zunehmend obsolet. Entwickler erwarten, dass Inhalte so flüssig wie Code sind.
+
+Heutzutage ist der effizienteste Workflow, zuerst mit AI zu übersetzen und deine Seiten global zu positionieren. In einer zweiten Phase setzt du dann menschliche Copywriter ein, um spezifische, stark frequentierte Inhalte zu optimieren und die Conversion zu steigern, sobald das Produkt bereits Umsätze generiert.
+
+## Warum ist Intlayer eine gute Alternative zu Phrase?
+
+Intlayer ist eine in der AI-Ära entstandene Lösung, die speziell für das moderne JavaScript/TypeScript-Ökosystem entwickelt wurde. Sie stellt das schwere Enterprise-Modell von Phrase mit Agilität und Transparenz in Frage.
+
+1.  **Preistransparenz:** Phrase ist bekannt für seine Enterprise-Preise, die undurchsichtig und für wachsende Unternehmen teuer sein können. Intlayer ermöglicht es dir, deine eigenen API-Schlüssel (OpenAI, Anthropic usw.) zu verwenden, sodass du Marktpreise für AI-Dienste bezahlst und nicht einen Aufschlag auf ein Plattform-Abonnement.
+2.  **Developer Experience (DX):** Phrase verlässt sich stark auf CLI-Tools und API-Aufrufe, um Dateien zu synchronisieren. Intlayer integriert sich direkt in den Bundler und die Laufzeit. Das bedeutet, dass Ihre Definitionen strikt typisiert sind (TypeScript) und fehlende Keys zur Compile‑Zeit erkannt werden, nicht erst in der Produktion.
+3.  **Speed to Market:** Intlayer entfernt die "Black Box" des TMS. Sie senden Dateien nicht weg und warten auf deren Rückkehr. Sie generieren Übersetzungen sofort per KI in Ihrer CI‑Pipeline oder in Ihrer lokalen Umgebung und halten so den Entwicklungszyklus eng.
+
+# Vergleich nebeneinander
+
+| Feature             | Phrase (Enterprise TMS)                            | Intlayer (AI-nativ)                                           |
+| :------------------ | :------------------------------------------------- | :------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| **Kernphilosophie** | Enterprise Governance & Workflow.                  | Verwaltet Content-Logik & AI-Generierung.                     |
+| **Preismodell**     | Maßgeschneidertes Enterprise / Sitzbasiert (hoch). | Bezahle für deine eigene Inferenz (BYO Key).                  |
+| **Integration**     | Intensive API-/CLI-Nutzung.                        | Tiefe Code-Integration (Declarative).                         |
+| **Updates**         | Sync erforderlich / Pipeline-abhängig.             | Sofortige Synchronisation mit der codebase oder der Live-App. |
+| **Dateiformate**    | Extrem breit (Legacy & Dokumente).                 | Modernes Web (JSON, JS, TS).                                  |
+| **Tests**           | QA-Checks / LQA-Schritte.                          | CI / CLI / A/B-Testing.                                       |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (ausschließlich Enterprise).                  | Open Source & selbst hostbar (Docker).                        |
+
+Intlayer bietet eine komplette, All-in-One-i18n-Lösung, die eine tiefe Integration Ihrer Inhalte ermöglicht. Ihre entfernten Inhalte können direkt mit Ihrer Codebase oder Ihrer Live-Anwendung synchronisiert werden. Im Vergleich dazu ist Phrase eine leistungsfähige, aber komplexe externe Abhängigkeit, die häufig dedizierte Lokalisierungsmanager benötigt, um effektiv betrieben zu werden.
+
+Darüber hinaus kann Intlayer als Feature-Flag- oder A/B-Testing-Tool eingesetzt werden, mit dem Sie verschiedene Inhaltsvarianten dynamisch testen können. Phrase ist darauf ausgelegt, sprachliche Konsistenz zu gewährleisten, während Intlayer Ihnen dabei hilft, Conversion und Benutzererlebnis mithilfe dynamischer Daten zu optimieren.
+
+Auch wenn Phrase bei komplexen, multi-formatigen Unternehmensanforderungen (z. B. der gleichzeitigen Übersetzung von PDFs, Untertiteln und Software) unbestritten stark ist, ist Intlayer die überlegene Wahl für Produktteams, die Webanwendungen entwickeln und full ownership, type safety sowie einen modernen, AI-driven Workflow ohne den Enterprise-Overhead anstreben.
+
+Schließlich: Für diejenigen, die Datenhoheit und Kontrolle priorisieren, ist Intlayer open-source und kann self-hosted betrieben werden. Docker files sind direkt im Repository verfügbar und geben Ihnen die volle Kontrolle über Ihre Lokalisierungsinfrastruktur — etwas, das mit Phrases geschlossenem SaaS-Ökosystem nicht möglich ist.

package/blog/en/l10n_platform_alternative/Lokalise.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n Platform Alternative for Lokalise
+description: Find the best L10n platform alternative to Lokalise for your needs
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Lokalise
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - lokalise
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Initial version
+---
+
+# An L10N Open-Source alternative to Lokalise (TMS)
+
+## Table of contents
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Translation Management System
+
+A Translation Management System (TMS) is a software platform designed to automate and streamline the translation and localization (L10n) process. Traditionally, a TMS serves as a centralized hub where content is uploaded, organized, and assigned to human translators. It manages workflows, stores translation memories (to avoid re-translating the same sentence twice), and handles the delivery of translated files back to the developers or content managers.
+
+In essence, a TMS has historically been the bridge between the technical code (where strings live) and the human linguists (who understand the culture).
+
+# Lokalise
+
+Lokalise is a significant player in the modern TMS landscape. Founded in 2017, it arrived to disrupt the market by focusing heavily on developer experience (DX) and design integration. Unlike older competitors, Lokalise prioritized a slick UI, powerful APIs, and integrations with tools like Figma and GitHub to reduce the friction of moving files back and forth.
+
+It built its success on being the "developer-friendly" TMS, automating the extraction and insertion of strings to free up engineering time. It effectively solved the problem of _continuous localization_ for fast-moving tech teams who wanted to get rid of manual spreadsheet emails.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer is known primarily as an i18n solution, but it also integrates a headless CMS. Unlike Lokalise, which acts largely as an external synchronization tool for your strings, Intlayer lives closer to your code. It controls the entire stack—from the bundling layer to remote content delivery—resulting in a smoother and more efficient content flow.
+
+## Why have the paradigms changed since AI?
+
+Lokalise perfected the "DevOps" side of localization—moving strings automatically. However, the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally shifted the paradigms of localization. The bottleneck is no longer _moving_ the strings; it is _generating_ them.
+
+With LLMs, the cost of translation has plummeted, and the speed has increased exponentially. The role of the localization team is shifting from "managing translators" to "managing context and review."
+
+While Lokalise has added AI features, it remains fundamentally a platform designed to manage human workflows and charge by the seat or key count. In an AI-first world, the value lies in how well you can orchestrate your AI models to generate context-aware content, not just in how easily you can assign a task to a human agency.
+
+Today, the most efficient workflow is to translate and position your pages globally using AI first. Then, in a second phase, you use human copywriters to optimize specific high-traffic content to boost conversion once the product is already generating revenue.
+
+## Why is Intlayer a good alternative to Lokalise?
+
+Intlayer is a solution born in the AI era. It was architected with the principle that raw translation is a commodity, but _context_ is king.
+
+Lokalise is often criticized for its steep pricing tiers, which can become prohibitively expensive as a startup scales. Intlayer adopts a different approach:
+
+1.  **Cost Efficiency:** You are not locked into a "per key" or "per seat" pricing model that penalizes growth. With Intlayer, you pay for your own inference (BYO Key), meaning your costs scale directly with your actual usage, not the platform's margins.
+2.  **Workflow Integration:** While Lokalise requires syncing files (even if automated), Intlayer allows for Declarative Content definition directly in your component files (React, Next.js, etc.). This keeps the context right next to the UI, reducing errors.
+3.  **Visual Management:** Intlayer provides a visual editor that interacts directly with your running application, ensuring that edits are made in full visual context—something often disconnected in traditional TMS file lists.
+
+# Comparison side by side
+
+| Feature             | Lokalise (Modern TMS)                   | Intlayer (AI-Native)                    |
+| :------------------ | :-------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Philosophy** | Automation & Design-stage L10n.         | Manages content logic & AI generation.  |
+| **Pricing Model**   | Per seat / MAU / Key count (High cost). | Pay for your own inference (BYO Key).   |
+| **Integration**     | API-based sync / Figma plugins.         | Deep code integration (Declarative).    |
+| **Updates**         | Sync delays / PR creation required.     | Instant sync with codebase or live app. |
+| **File Formats**    | Agnostic (Mobile, Web, Documents).      | Modern Web (JSON, JS, TS).              |
+| **Testing**         | Review workflow.                        | CI / CLI / A/B Testing.                 |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (Closed Source).                   | Open Source & Self-Hostable (Docker).   |
+
+Intlayer offers a complete, all-in-one i18n solution that allows for a deep integration of your content. Your remote content can be synchronized directly with your codebase or your live application. In comparison, Lokalise generally relies on creating Pull Requests to update content in your repo, which maintains a separation between "content state" and "application state."
+
+Furthermore, Intlayer can be utilized as a Feature Flag or A/B testing tool, enabling you to test different content variations dynamically. While Lokalise focuses on getting the words right, Intlayer focuses on getting the _user experience_ right through dynamic data serving.
+
+Lokalise is excellent for mobile apps (iOS/Android) and design-led workflows. However, for modern web applications using frameworks like Next.js or React, Intlayer's native handling of `.js`, `.ts`, and JSON dictionaries offers a superior developer experience (DX) with full TypeScript support for content—ensuring you never ship a missing translation key again.
+
+Finally, for those prioritizing data sovereignty and control, Intlayer is open-source and can be self-hosted. Docker files are available directly in the repository, giving you full ownership of your localization infrastructure—a stark contrast to Lokalise's closed SaaS model.

package/blog/en/l10n_platform_alternative/crowdin.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n Platform Alternative
+description: Find the best L10n platform alternative for your needs
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Crowdin
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - crowdin
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Initial version
+---
+
+# An L10N Open-Source alternative to Crowdin (TMS)
+
+## Table of contents
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Translation Management System
+
+A Translation Management System (TMS) is a software platform designed to automate and streamline the translation and localization (L10n) process. Traditionally, a TMS serves as a centralized hub where content is uploaded, organized, and assigned to human translators. It manages workflows, stores translation memories (to avoid re-translating the same sentence twice), and handles the delivery of translated files back to the developers or content managers.
+
+In essence, a TMS has historically been the bridge between the technical code (where strings live) and the human linguists (who understand the culture).
+
+# Crowdin
+
+Crowdin is a veteran in this space. Founded in 2009, it emerged during a time when the primary challenge of localization was connectivity. Its mission was clear: to place copywriters, translators, and project owners in relation to one another effectively.
+
+For over a decade, Crowdin has been the industry standard for managing localization. It solved the fragmentation problem by allowing teams to upload `.po`, `.xml`, or `.yaml` files and having translators work on them in a cloud interface. It built its reputation on solid workflow automation, allowing companies to scale from one language to ten without drowning in spreadsheets.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer is known primarily as an i18n solution, but it also integrates a CMS. Unlike Crowdin, which is limited to acting as a wrapper around your existing i18n setup, Intlayer controls the entire stack—from the bundling layer to remote content delivery—resulting in a smoother and more efficient content flow.
+
+## Why have the paradigms changed since AI?
+
+While Crowdin optimized the human workflow, the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally shifted the paradigms of localization. The role of the copywriter is no longer to create the translation from scratch, but to review AI-generated content.
+
+Why? Because AI is 1,000x cheaper and infinitely faster.
+
+However, there is a limitation. Copywriting is not just about translation; it is about adapting the message to different cultures and contexts. We do not sell an iPhone to your grandmother in the same way we sell it to a Chinese business executive. The tone, the idiom, and the cultural markers must differ.
+
+Today, the most efficient workflow is to translate and position your pages globally using AI first. Then, in a second phase, you use human copywriters to optimize specific high-traffic content to boost conversion once the product is already generating revenue.
+
+Although Crowdin's revenue—driven mainly by its well-proven legacy solutions—continues to perform well, I believe the traditional localization sector will be severely impacted within a 5 to 10-year horizon. The model of paying per word or per seat for a management tool is becoming obsolete.
+
+## Why is Intlayer a good alternative to Crowdin?
+
+Intlayer is a solution born in the AI era. It was architected with the principle that in 2026, raw translation no longer holds intrinsic value. It is a commodity.
+
+Therefore, Intlayer does not position itself merely as a TMS, but as a **Content Management** solution that deeply integrates a visual editor and internationalization logic.
+
+With Intlayer, you generate your translations at the cost of your inferences. You are not locked into a platform's pricing model; you choose the provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, etc.), you choose the model, and you translate via CI (Continuous Integration), CLI, or directly through the integrated CMS. It shifts the value from access to translators to management of context.
+
+# Comparison side by side
+
+| Feature             | Crowdin (Legacy TMS)                          | Intlayer (AI-Native)                    |
+| :------------------ | :-------------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Philosophy** | Connects humans to strings.                   | Manages content logic & AI generation.  |
+| **Pricing Model**   | Per seat / hosted tier.                       | Pay for your own inference (BYO Key).   |
+| **Integration**     | File-based exchange (Upload/Download).        | Deep code integration (Declarative).    |
+| **Updates**         | Often requires CI/CD rebuilds to deploy text. | Instant sync with codebase or live app. |
+| **File Formats**    | Diverse (.po, .xml, .yaml, etc.).             | Modern Web (JSON, JS, TS).              |
+| **Testing**         | Limited.                                      | CI / CLI.                               |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (mostly).                                | Open Source & Self-Hostable (Docker).   |
+
+Intlayer offers a complete, all-in-one i18n solution that allows for a deep integration of your content. Your remote content can be synchronized directly with your codebase or your live application. In comparison, Crowdin often necessitates a rebuild of your application in your CI/CD pipeline to update content, creating friction between the translation team and the deployment process.
+
+Furthermore, Intlayer can be utilized as a Feature Flag or A/B testing tool, enabling you to test different content variations dynamically—something standard TMS tools like Crowdin do not support natively.
+
+Crowdin supports a wide range of file formats—including legacy types like `.po`, `.xml`, and `.yaml`, which can be beneficial for projects with established workflows or older systems. Intlayer, by contrast, works primarily with modern web-oriented formats such as `.json`, `.js`, and `.ts`. This means Intlayer may not be compatible with all legacy file formats, which is a consideration for teams migrating from older platforms.
+
+Finally, for those prioritizing data sovereignty and control, Intlayer is open-source and can be self-hosted. Docker files are available directly in the repository, giving you full ownership of your localization infrastructure.

package/blog/en/l10n_platform_alternative/phrase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n Platform Alternative for Phrase
+description: Find the best L10n platform alternative to Phrase for your needs
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Phrase
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - phrase
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Initial version
+---
+
+# An L10N Open-Source alternative to Phrase (TMS)
+
+## Table of contents
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Translation Management System
+
+A Translation Management System (TMS) is a software platform designed to automate and streamline the translation and localization (L10n) process. Traditionally, a TMS serves as a centralized hub where content is uploaded, organized, and assigned to human translators. It manages workflows, stores translation memories (to avoid re-translating the same sentence twice), and handles the delivery of translated files back to the developers or content managers.
+
+In essence, a TMS has historically been the bridge between the technical code (where strings live) and the human linguists (who understand the culture).
+
+# Phrase (formerly PhraseApp)
+
+Phrase is a heavyweight in the enterprise localization space. Originally known as PhraseApp, it has grown significantly, especially following its merger with Memsource. It positions itself as a comprehensive Localization Suite designed for software localization, offering robust API capabilities and extensive format support.
+
+Phrase is built for scale. It is the go-to choice for large enterprises that need to manage complex workflows, vast translation memories, and strict quality assurance processes across many different teams. Its strength lies in its ability to handle "heavy duty" localization tasks, offering an all-in-one ecosystem for both software strings and document translation.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer is known primarily as an i18n solution, but it also integrates a headless CMS. Unlike Phrase, which functions as a massive, external enterprise suite, Intlayer acts as a nimble, code-integrated layer. It controls the entire stack—from the bundling layer to remote content delivery—resulting in a smoother and more efficient content flow for modern web applications.
+
+## Why have the paradigms changed since AI?
+
+Phrase was built to solve the problems of the previous decade: managing massive teams of human translators and standardizing workflows across fragmented enterprise departments. It excels at workflow governance.
+
+However, the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally shifted the paradigms of localization. The challenge is no longer "how do we manage 50 translators?" but "how do we validate AI-generated content efficiently?"
+
+While Phrase has integrated AI features, they are often layered on top of a legacy architecture designed for human-centric workflows and seat-based licensing. In the modern era, the friction of "pushing to TMS" and "pulling from TMS" is becoming obsolete. Developers expect content to be as fluid as code.
+
+Today, the most efficient workflow is to translate and position your pages globally using AI first. Then, in a second phase, you use human copywriters to optimize specific high-traffic content to boost conversion once the product is already generating revenue.
+
+## Why is Intlayer a good alternative to Phrase?
+
+Intlayer is a solution born in the AI era, designed specifically for the modern JavaScript/TypeScript ecosystem. It challenges the heavy enterprise model of Phrase with agility and transparency.
+
+1.  **Pricing Transparency:** Phrase is known for its Enterprise pricing, which can be opaque and expensive for growing companies. Intlayer allows you to bring your own API keys (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.), ensuring you pay market rates for intelligence rather than a markup on a platform subscription.
+2.  **Developer Experience (DX):** Phrase relies heavily on CLI tools and API calls to sync files. Intlayer integrates directly into the bundler and runtime. This means your definitions are strictly typed (TypeScript), and missing keys are caught at compile time, not in production.
+3.  **Speed to Market:** Intlayer removes the "black box" of the TMS. You don't send files away and wait for them to come back. You generate translations instantly via AI in your CI pipeline or local environment, keeping the development loop tight.
+
+# Comparison side by side
+
+| Feature             | Phrase (Enterprise TMS)                | Intlayer (AI-Native)                    |
+| :------------------ | :------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Philosophy** | Enterprise Governance & Workflow.      | Manages content logic & AI generation.  |
+| **Pricing Model**   | Custom Enterprise / Seat-based (High). | Pay for your own inference (BYO Key).   |
+| **Integration**     | Heavy API / CLI usage.                 | Deep code integration (Declarative).    |
+| **Updates**         | Sync required / Pipeline dependent.    | Instant sync with codebase or live app. |
+| **File Formats**    | Extremely broad (Legacy & Documents).  | Modern Web (JSON, JS, TS).              |
+| **Testing**         | QA Checks / LQA steps.                 | CI / CLI / A/B Testing.                 |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (Strictly Enterprise).            | Open Source & Self-Hostable (Docker).   |
+
+Intlayer offers a complete, all-in-one i18n solution that allows for a deep integration of your content. Your remote content can be synchronized directly with your codebase or your live application. In comparison, Phrase is a powerful but complex external dependency that often requires dedicated localization managers to operate effectively.
+
+Furthermore, Intlayer can be utilized as a Feature Flag or A/B testing tool, enabling you to test different content variations dynamically. Phrase is designed to ensure linguistic consistency, whereas Intlayer helps you optimize for conversion and user experience through dynamic data.
+
+While Phrase is undeniable for complex, multi-format enterprise needs (e.g., translating PDFs, subtitles, and software simultaneously), Intlayer is the superior choice for product teams building web applications who want full ownership, type safety, and a modern, AI-driven workflow without the enterprise overhead.
+
+Finally, for those prioritizing data sovereignty and control, Intlayer is open-source and can be self-hosted. Docker files are available directly in the repository, giving you full ownership of your localization infrastructure—something impossible with Phrase's closed SaaS ecosystem.

package/blog/en-GB/l10n_platform_alternative/Lokalise.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n platform alternative to Lokalise
+description: Find the best L10n platform alternative to Lokalise for your needs
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Lokalise
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - lokalise
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Initial version
+---
+
+# An open-source L10n alternative to Lokalise (TMS)
+
+## Table of contents
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Translation Management System
+
+A Translation Management System (TMS) is a software platform designed to automate and streamline the translation and localisation (L10n) process. Traditionally, a TMS serves as a centralised hub where content is uploaded, organised, and assigned to human translators. It manages workflows, stores translation memories (to avoid re-translating the same sentence twice), and handles the delivery of translated files back to the developers or content managers.
+
+In essence, a TMS has historically been the bridge between the technical code (where strings live) and the human linguists (who understand the culture).
+
+# Lokalise
+
+Lokalise is a major player in the modern TMS landscape. Founded in 2017, it set out to disrupt the market by focusing heavily on developer experience (DX) and design integration. Unlike older competitors, Lokalise prioritised a slick UI, powerful APIs, and integrations with tools like Figma and GitHub to reduce the friction of moving files back and forth.
+
+It built its success on being the 'developer-friendly' TMS, automating the extraction and insertion of strings to free up engineering time. It effectively solved the problem of _continuous localisation_ for fast-moving tech teams who wanted to get rid of manual spreadsheet emails.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer is known primarily as an i18n solution, but it also integrates a headless CMS. Unlike Lokalise, which acts largely as an external synchronisation tool for your strings, Intlayer lives closer to your code. It controls the entire stack—from the bundling layer to remote content delivery—resulting in a smoother and more efficient content flow.
+
+## Why have the paradigms changed since AI?
+
+Lokalise perfected the "DevOps" side of localisation—moving strings automatically. However, the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally shifted the paradigms of localisation. The bottleneck is no longer _moving_ the strings; it is _generating_ them.
+
+With LLMs, the cost of translation has plummeted, and the speed has increased exponentially. The role of the localisation team is shifting from "managing translators" to "managing context and review."
+
+While Lokalise has added AI features, it remains fundamentally a platform designed to manage human workflows and charge by the seat or key count. In an AI-first world, the value lies in how well you can orchestrate your AI models to generate context-aware content, not just in how easily you can assign a task to a human agency.
+
+Today, the most efficient workflow is to translate and position your pages globally using AI first. Then, in a second phase, you use human copywriters to optimise specific high-traffic content to boost conversion once the product is already generating revenue.
+
+## Why is Intlayer a good alternative to Lokalise?
+
+Intlayer is a solution born in the AI era. It was architected with the principle that raw translation is a commodity, but _context_ is king.
+
+Lokalise is often criticised for its steep pricing tiers, which can become prohibitively expensive as a startup scales. Intlayer adopts a different approach:
+
+1.  **Cost Efficiency:** You are not locked into a "per key" or "per seat" pricing model that penalises growth. With Intlayer, you pay for your own inference (BYO Key), meaning your costs scale directly with your actual usage, not the platform's margins.
+2.  **Workflow Integration:** While Lokalise requires synchronising files (even if automated), Intlayer allows for Declarative Content definition directly in your component files (React, Next.js, etc.). This keeps the context right next to the UI, reducing errors.
+3.  **Visual Management:** Intlayer provides a visual editor that interacts directly with your running application, ensuring that edits are made in full visual context—something often disconnected from traditional TMS file lists.
+
+# Comparison side by side
+
+| Feature             | Lokalise (Modern TMS)                          | Intlayer (AI-Native)                                   |
+| :------------------ | :--------------------------------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Philosophy** | Automation & design-stage L10n.                | Manages content logic & AI generation.                 |
+| **Pricing Model**   | Per seat / MAU / key count (high cost).        | Pay for your own inference (BYO Key).                  |
+| **Integration**     | API-based synchronisation / Figma plugins.     | Deep code integration (declarative).                   |
+| **Updates**         | Synchronisation delays / PR creation required. | Instant synchronisation with the codebase or live app. |
+| **File Formats**    | Platform-agnostic (mobile, web, documents).    | Modern web (JSON, JS, TS).                             |
+| **Testing**         | Review workflow.                               | CI / CLI / A/B testing.                                |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (closed source).                          | Open source & self-hostable (Docker).                  |
+
+Intlayer offers a complete, all-in-one i18n solution that enables deep integration of your content. Your remote content can be synchronised directly with your codebase or your live application. By contrast, Lokalise generally relies on creating Pull Requests to update content in your repo, which preserves a separation between "content state" and "application state."
+
+Furthermore, Intlayer can be utilised as a feature flag or A/B testing tool, enabling you to test different content variations dynamically. While Lokalise focuses on getting the words right, Intlayer focuses on getting the _user experience_ right through dynamic data serving.
+
+Lokalise is excellent for mobile apps (iOS/Android) and design-led workflows. However, for modern web applications using frameworks such as Next.js or React, Intlayer's native handling of `.js`, `.ts`, and JSON dictionaries offers a superior developer experience (DX) with full TypeScript support for content—ensuring you never ship a missing translation key again.
+
+Finally, for those prioritising data sovereignty and control, Intlayer is open-source and can be self-hosted. Docker files are available directly in the repository, giving you full ownership of your localisation infrastructure—a stark contrast to Lokalise's closed SaaS model.

package/blog/en-GB/l10n_platform_alternative/crowdin.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n Platform Alternative
+description: Find the best L10n platform alternative for your needs
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Crowdin
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - crowdin
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Initial version
+---
+
+# An open-source L10n alternative to Crowdin (TMS)
+
+## Table of contents
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Translation Management System
+
+A Translation Management System (TMS) is a software platform designed to automate and streamline the translation and localisation (L10n) process. Traditionally, a TMS serves as a centralised hub where content is uploaded, organised, and assigned to human translators. It manages workflows, stores translation memories (to avoid re-translating the same sentence twice), and handles the delivery of translated files back to the developers or content managers.
+
+In essence, a TMS has long served as the bridge between the technical code (where strings reside) and the human linguists (who understand the culture).
+
+# Crowdin
+
+Crowdin is a veteran in this space. Founded in 2009, it emerged during a time when the primary challenge of localisation was connectivity. Its mission was clear: to place copywriters, translators, and project owners in relation to one another effectively.
+
+For over a decade, Crowdin has been the industry standard for managing localisation. It solved the fragmentation problem by allowing teams to upload `.po`, `.xml`, or `.yaml` files and having translators work on them via a cloud interface. It built its reputation on solid workflow automation, allowing companies to scale from one language to ten without drowning in spreadsheets.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer is known primarily as an i18n solution, but it also integrates a CMS. Unlike Crowdin, which is limited to acting as a wrapper around your existing i18n setup, Intlayer controls the entire stack—from the bundling layer to remote content delivery—resulting in a smoother and more efficient content flow.
+
+## Why have the paradigms changed since AI?
+
+While Crowdin optimised the human workflow, the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally shifted the paradigms of localisation. The role of the copywriter is no longer to create translations from scratch, but to review AI-generated content.
+
+Why? Because AI is 1,000x cheaper and infinitely faster.
+
+However, there is a limitation. Copywriting is not just about translation; it is about adapting the message to different cultures and contexts. We do not sell an iPhone to your grandmother in the same way we sell one to a Chinese business executive. The tone, the idiom, and the cultural markers must differ.
+
+Today, the most efficient workflow is to translate and position your pages globally using AI first. Then, in a second phase, you use human copywriters to optimise specific high-traffic content to boost conversion once the product is already generating revenue.
+
+Although Crowdin's revenue—driven mainly by its well‑proven legacy solutions—continues to perform well, I believe the traditional localisation sector will be severely impacted within a 5‑ to 10‑year horizon. The model of paying per word or per seat for a management tool is becoming obsolete.
+
+## Why is Intlayer a good alternative to Crowdin?
+
+Intlayer is a solution born in the AI era. It was architected with the principle that in 2026, raw translation no longer holds intrinsic value. It is a commodity.
+
+Therefore, Intlayer does not position itself merely as a TMS, but as a **Content Management** solution that deeply integrates a visual editor and internationalisation logic.
+
+With Intlayer, you generate your translations at the cost of your inferences. You are not locked into a platform's pricing model; you choose the provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, etc.), you choose the model, and you translate via CI (Continuous Integration), CLI, or directly via the integrated CMS. It shifts the value from access to translators towards management of context.
+
+# Comparison side-by-side
+
+| Feature             | Crowdin (Legacy TMS)                          | Intlayer (AI-Native)                             |
+| :------------------ | :-------------------------------------------- | :----------------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Philosophy** | Connects humans to strings.                   | Manages content logic & AI generation.           |
+| **Pricing Model**   | Per-seat / hosted tier.                       | Pay for your own inference (bring your own key). |
+| **Integration**     | File-based exchange (upload/download).        | Deep code integration (declarative).             |
+| **Updates**         | Often requires CI/CD rebuilds to deploy text. | Instant sync with the codebase or the live app.  |
+| **File Formats**    | Various (.po, .xml, .yaml, etc.).             | Modern web (JSON, JS, TS).                       |
+| **Testing**         | Limited.                                      | CI / CLI.                                        |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (mostly).                                | Open-source & self-hostable (Docker).            |
+
+Intlayer offers a complete, all-in-one i18n solution that allows for a deep integration of your content. Your remote content can be synchronised directly with your codebase or your live application. By contrast, Crowdin often necessitates a rebuild of your application in your CI/CD pipeline to update content, creating friction between the translation team and the deployment process.
+
+Furthermore, Intlayer can be utilised as a Feature Flag or A/B testing tool, enabling you to test different content variations dynamically — something standard TMS tools like Crowdin do not natively support.
+
+Crowdin supports a wide range of file formats—including legacy types like `.po`, `.xml`, and `.yaml`, which can be beneficial for projects with established workflows or older systems. Intlayer, by contrast, works primarily with modern web-oriented formats such as `.json`, `.js`, and `.ts`. This means Intlayer may not be compatible with all legacy file formats, which is a consideration for teams migrating from older platforms.
+
+Finally, for those prioritising data sovereignty and control, Intlayer is open-source and can be self-hosted. Docker files are available directly in the repository, giving you full ownership of your localisation infrastructure.

package/blog/en-GB/l10n_platform_alternative/phrase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+---
+createdAt: 2025-12-18
+updatedAt: 2025-11-06
+title: L10n platform alternative to Phrase
+description: Find the best L10n platform alternative to Phrase to suit your needs
+keywords:
+  - L10n
+  - TMS
+  - Phrase
+slugs:
+  - blog
+  - l10n-platform-alternative
+  - phrase
+history:
+  - version: 7.5.0
+    date: 2025-12-18
+    changes: Initial version
+---
+
+# An L10n open-source alternative to Phrase (TMS)
+
+## Table of contents
+
+<TOC/>
+
+# Translation Management System
+
+A Translation Management System (TMS) is a software platform designed to automate and streamline the translation and localisation (L10n) process. Traditionally, a TMS serves as a centralised hub where content is uploaded, organised, and assigned to human translators. It manages workflows, stores translation memories (to avoid translating the same sentence twice), and handles the delivery of translated files back to the developers or content managers.
+
+In essence, a TMS has traditionally been the bridge between the technical code (where strings live) and the human linguists (who understand the culture).
+
+# Phrase (formerly PhraseApp)
+
+Phrase is a heavyweight in the enterprise localisation space. Originally known as PhraseApp, it has grown significantly, especially following its merger with Memsource. It positions itself as a comprehensive Localisation Suite designed for software localisation, offering robust API capabilities and extensive format support.
+
+Phrase is built for scale. It is the go-to choice for large enterprises that need to manage complex workflows, vast translation memories, and strict quality assurance processes across many different teams. Its strength lies in its ability to handle 'heavy-duty' localisation tasks, offering an all-in-one ecosystem for both software strings and document translation.
+
+# Intlayer
+
+Intlayer is known primarily as an i18n solution, but it also integrates a headless CMS. Unlike Phrase, which functions as a massive, external enterprise suite, Intlayer acts as a nimble, code-integrated layer. It controls the entire stack—from the bundling layer to remote content delivery—resulting in a smoother and more efficient content flow for modern web applications.
+
+## Why have the paradigms changed since AI?
+
+Phrase was built to solve the problems of the previous decade: managing massive teams of human translators and standardising workflows across fragmented enterprise departments. It excels at workflow governance.
+
+However, the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has fundamentally shifted the paradigms of localisation. The challenge is no longer "how do we manage 50 translators?" but "how do we validate AI-generated content efficiently?"
+
+While Phrase has integrated AI features, they are often layered on top of a legacy architecture designed for human-centric workflows and seat-based licensing. In the modern era, the friction of "pushing to TMS" and "pulling from TMS" is becoming obsolete. Developers expect content to be as fluid as code.
+
+Today, the most efficient workflow is to translate and position your pages globally using AI first. Then, in a second phase, you use human copywriters to optimise specific high-traffic content to boost conversion once the product is already generating revenue.
+
+## Why is Intlayer a good alternative to Phrase?
+
+Intlayer is a solution born in the AI era, designed specifically for the modern JavaScript/TypeScript ecosystem. It challenges the heavy enterprise model of Phrase with agility and transparency.
+
+1.  **Pricing Transparency:** Phrase is known for its Enterprise pricing, which can be opaque and costly for growing companies. Intlayer lets you bring your own API keys (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.), ensuring you pay market rates for intelligence rather than a markup on a platform subscription.
+2.  **Developer Experience (DX):** Phrase relies heavily on CLI tools and API calls to sync files. Intlayer integrates directly into the bundler and runtime. This means your definitions are strictly typed (TypeScript), and missing keys are caught at compile-time rather than in production.
+3.  **Speed to market:** Intlayer removes the "black box" of the TMS. You don't send files away and wait for them to come back. You generate translations instantly via AI in your CI pipeline or local environment, keeping the development loop tight.
+
+# Side-by-side comparison
+
+| Feature             | Phrase (Enterprise TMS)                | Intlayer (AI-Native)                    |
+| :------------------ | :------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------- |
+| **Core Philosophy** | Enterprise governance & workflow.      | Manages content logic & AI generation.  |
+| **Pricing Model**   | Custom enterprise / seat-based (high). | Pay for your own inference (BYO key).   |
+| **Integration**     | Heavy API / CLI usage.                 | Deep code integration (declarative).    |
+| **Updates**         | Sync required / pipeline dependent.    | Instant sync with codebase or live app. |
+| **File Formats**    | Extremely broad (legacy & documents).  | Modern web (JSON, JS, TS).              |
+| **Testing**         | QA checks / LQA steps.                 | CI / CLI / A/B testing.                 |
+| **Hosting**         | SaaS (strictly enterprise).            | Open-source & self-hostable (Docker).   |
+
+Intlayer offers a complete, all-in-one i18n solution that allows for a deep integration of your content. Your remote content can be synchronised directly with your codebase or your live application. In comparison, Phrase is a powerful but complex external dependency that often requires dedicated localisation managers to operate effectively.
+
+Furthermore, Intlayer can be utilised as a feature flag or A/B testing tool, enabling you to test different content variations dynamically. Phrase is designed to ensure linguistic consistency, whereas Intlayer helps you optimise for conversion and user experience through dynamic data.
+
+While Phrase is indispensable for complex, multi-format enterprise requirements (e.g., translating PDFs, subtitles, and software simultaneously), Intlayer is the superior choice for product teams building web applications who want full ownership, type safety, and a modern, AI-driven workflow without the enterprise overhead.
+
+Finally, for those prioritising data sovereignty and control, Intlayer is open-source and can be self-hosted. Docker files are available directly in the repository, giving you full ownership of your localisation infrastructure—something impossible with Phrase's closed SaaS ecosystem.