@graffiticode/l0175 0.2.0 → 0.3.1

package/dist/static/stems.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-4.0 -->
 # L0175 Appropriate-Stem Catalog (SBAC · Grade 5 · Claim 1)
 
-_Revised: 2026-06-24_
+_Revised: 2026-08-28_
 
 The **code generator authors each question's stem from this catalog** and emits it on the
 outcome (`stem`, and `stem-b` on EBSR). The compiler uses the authored text verbatim — it does
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ dual-text-stimuli stems are out of scope).
 **First match your program's `target`, then use that target's catalog below:**
 - **`c1-t4`** (Reasoning & Evidence, literary) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T4 Reasoning & Evidence.pdf`
 - **`c1-t11`** (Reasoning & Evidence, informational) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T11 Reasoning & Evidence.pdf`
+- **`c1-t2`** (Central Ideas, **literary**) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T2 Central Ideas.pdf`
 - **`c1-t9`** (Central Ideas, informational) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T9 Central Ideas.pdf`
+- **`c1-t1`** (Key Details, **literary**) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T1 Key Details.pdf`
 - **`c1-t8`** (Key Details, informational) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T8 Key Details.pdf`
 - **`c1-t10`** (Word Meanings, informational) → `packages/core/data/E.G5.C1.T10 Word Meanings.pdf`
 
@@ -21,13 +23,29 @@ dual-text-stimuli stems are out of scope).
 1. Use the section for your `target`.
 2. Pick the stem that matches your **item `type`** and the task. Task-model numbering is
    per-target and differs between targets — match by item type, not by number. (R&E targets:
-   EBSR=TM1, Hot-Text=TM2, Short-Text=TM3. T9 Central Ideas: Multiple-Choice=TM1,
-   Multi-Select=TM2, EBSR=TM3, Hot-Text=TM4, Short-Text=TM5. T8 Key Details: Multiple-Choice=TM1,
-   Multi-Select=TM2, Hot-Text=TM3. T10 Word Meanings: Multiple-Choice=TM1, Multi-Select=TM2,
-   Hot-Text=TM3.)
+   EBSR=TM1, Hot-Text=TM2, Short-Text=TM3. T2 and T9 Central Ideas: Multiple-Choice=TM1,
+   Multi-Select=TM2, EBSR=TM3, Hot-Text=TM4, Short-Text=TM5. T1 and T8 Key Details:
+   Multiple-Choice=TM1, Multi-Select=TM2, Hot-Text=TM3. T10 Word Meanings: Multiple-Choice=TM1,
+   Multi-Select=TM2, Hot-Text=TM3.)
 3. Pick the **one stem template** that matches the task and the dimension, and fill its
    bracketed `[...]` slot.
 
+Task-model number → item type, per target (the numbers collide across targets, so a number is
+meaningless without its target):
+
+<!-- GENERATED:task-models START (from targets.json — regenerated by tools/build-static.js; do not edit by hand) -->
+| Target | tm1 | tm2 | tm3 | tm4 | tm5 |
+|--------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
+| `c1-t4` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 4 (Reasoning & Evidence) | ebsr | hot-text | short-text | — | — |
+| `c1-t11` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 11 (Reasoning & Evidence) | ebsr | hot-text | short-text | — | — |
+| `c1-t2` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 2 (Central Ideas) | multiple-choice | multi-select | ebsr | hot-text | short-text |
+| `c1-t9` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 9 (Central Ideas) | multiple-choice | multi-select | ebsr | hot-text | short-text |
+| `c1-t1` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 1 (Key Details) | multiple-choice | multi-select | hot-text | — | — |
+| `c1-t8` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 8 (Key Details) | multiple-choice | multi-select | hot-text | — | — |
+| `c1-t10` — Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 10 (Word Meanings) | multiple-choice | multi-select | hot-text | — | — |
+<!-- GENERATED:task-models END -->
+
+
 **Specificity rule (required, both targets).** The `[...]` slot must name the concrete thing the
 question is about — a character's name (`Mother`), a specific event (`the turkey-feeding`), a
 specific idea (`the relationship between the bridge designs`), the author's point of view, etc.
@@ -111,6 +129,15 @@ Author as `stem` (the prompt); every Short Text stem ends with the explain claus
   `stem "What did the author most likely mean by including the scarecrow in the passage?"`
 - theme / inference / Short Text →
   `stem "What inference can be made about the theme? Explain using key details from the passage to support your answer."`
+- topic / Short Text →
+  `stem "What is the story mostly about? Explain using key details from the passage to support your answer."`
+
+**`theme` vs `topic` (both → `rl-2`, but they are different dimensions).** `topic` is what the
+text is *about* (its subject) — cued by "**mostly about**" / "**what is the passage/story about**".
+`theme` is the *lesson or message* the text conveys — cued by "**the theme**" / "**the message**"
+/ "**the lesson**". Route a "mostly about" prompt to `topic`, and write the correct answer as a
+subject statement ("The story is mostly about …"), **not** a life-lesson statement. Reserve the
+lesson-style answer for `theme`.
 
 ---
 
@@ -124,6 +151,14 @@ concepts / author's use of information / point of view / purpose]` (or, for an o
 "key **evidence**" (T4 said "key details"), and Part B units are
 `sentence(s) / paragraph(s) / section(s)`.
 
+**`purpose` vs `point-of-view` (both start "author's …" but are different dimensions with
+different companions).** `purpose` = *why the author wrote the text* / what they are trying to do
+(inform, persuade, explain) — cued by "**author's purpose**" / "why the author wrote" → companion
+`ri-8`. `point-of-view` = *the author's stance or attitude* toward the subject — cued by
+"**author's point of view**" / "how the author feels about" → companion `ri-6`. Route a
+"purpose" prompt to `purpose`/`ri-8` and a "point of view" prompt to `point-of-view`/`ri-6`;
+easiest is to **omit `standard`** and let the dimension infer its companion.
+
 ## Task Model 1 — EBSR (two-part selected response)
 
 **Lead-in:** This question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.
@@ -186,6 +221,90 @@ Author as `stem`; every Short Text stem ends with the explain clause ("key **evi
 
 ---
 
+# Target 2 (`c1-t2`) — Central Ideas (**literary**)
+
+The **literary twin of Target 9**, and the only other target that offers **all five item types**.
+DOK **2** (**3** for the written response). Standards **RL-1 + RL-2**. Dimensions: `theme`,
+`central-idea`, `key-detail`, `summary` — every one answers to `rl-2`, so a composed item's
+`standards` is `["rl-1", "rl-2"]`. Distractors use the same **significance** taxonomy as T9
+(`too-narrow`, `too-broad`, `misreads-detail`, `insignificant`) — usually *true* statements that
+simply aren't central.
+
+**Three things T2 does that T9 does not:**
+
+1. **Theme leads.** RL-2 is "determine a theme of a story, drama, or poem from details in the
+   text." Prefer the `theme` dimension for a story or poem and phrase the correct answer as a
+   *lesson or message* ("Keeping at something can matter more than winning"), not a plot summary.
+   Use `central-idea` when the prompt says "main idea" rather than "theme" or "message".
+2. **Summary is SCOPED.** The guideline is explicit: *items will not ask students to summarize the
+   entire text; students will summarize a key event(s) or idea(s).* Point every `summary` stem at a
+   section or a key event ("Summarize what happens after…", "…the first paragraph"). A
+   "summarize the passage" stem is out of scope on T2 — that phrasing belongs to T9.
+3. **`key-detail` covers key EVENTS.** In a story the details that build a theme are usually
+   events, so tag them `key-detail`.
+
+**A caution from the guideline, for `insignificant`:** distractors "will not contain details of such
+insignificance that the options are implausible." A foil so trivial that no student would pick it
+is a wasted option — keep it true, relevant, and merely *not central*. Likewise, TM1 warns that
+distractors must not turn on sequencing or other DOK-1 errors.
+
+## Task Model 1 — Multiple Choice (`type multiple-choice`, single-answer, DOK 2)
+
+- Which sentence best [shows/tells/describes] the [theme/main idea] of the passage?
+- Which sentence best [shows/tells/describes] the [theme/main idea] of the [story/poem] told by the [narrator/speaker]?
+- Which sentence best [shows/tells/describes] [the author's/character's] message about [provide theme/main idea]?
+- Which [sentences/lines/paragraph(s)] from the passage best [shows/tells/describes] the [theme/main idea]?
+- Which sentence best summarizes the [first paragraph/introductory paragraph]?
+- Which sentence best summarizes what happens after [provide plot]?
+- Read this summary. [summary of a section; one key detail/event is missing] Which [key detail/event] is missing from the summary? *(the correct answer must be a pivotal key event or idea)*
+
+## Task Model 2 — Multi-Select (`type multi-select`, choose two, DOK 2)
+
+`focus` is a **list** of the two correct claims.
+- Choose two sentences that best [show/tell/describe] the [theme(s)/main idea(s)] presented in the passage.
+- Choose two sentences that should be included in a summary of [the text/section of the text].
+
+## Task Model 3 — EBSR (`type ebsr`, two-part, DOK 2)
+
+Lead-in: *The following question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.*
+Part A:
+- Which sentence best [shows/tells/describes] the [theme/main idea] of the text?
+- Which sentence best [shows/tells/describes] the [author's/character's] [message/main idea]?
+
+Part B (`stem-b`):
+- Which [sentence(s)/line(s)/paragraph(s)] from the passage best [support(s)/is (are) an example of] your answer in part A?
+
+**No-giveaway (the guideline states it outright):** avoid Part A/Part B choices that obviously
+correspond, so that picking a Part A option determines the Part B option. Some or all Part B options
+should plausibly support **more than one** Part A choice — author at least one
+`supports-wrong-claim` source listing BOTH the correct claim and a distractor.
+
+## Task Model 4 — Hot Text (`type hot-text`, single-part select-text, DOK 2)
+
+Single-part: the authored `stem` is the whole instruction; the student clicks the sentence(s) whose
+`source`s `directly-supports` the focus claim. The stem states how many to click.
+- Click on [one/two] [sentence(s)/line(s)/set of lines/paragraph(s)] that best [shows/tells/describes] the [theme/main idea] of [the text/section of the text]. Choose [one/two] answer(s).
+- Read this summary of [the text/section of the text]. [summary; one key event missing] A [key event/detail] is missing from the summary. Click on the [sentence(s)/paragraph(s)] that include(s) the missing [event/detail].
+- Click on the [one/two] [key detail(s)/event(s)] that should be included in a summary of the text.
+
+## Task Model 5 — Short Text (`type short-text`, constructed response, DOK 3)
+
+Written response; **never the whole text** (see #2 above).
+- Determine the [theme/main idea] of the passage. Explain the [theme/main idea] using key details from the passage to support your answer.
+- What is the [theme/main idea] of the passage? Explain using key details from the passage to support your answer.
+- Summarize the [first paragraph/introductory paragraph]. Use key [details/events] from the passage in your summary.
+- Summarize what happens [after/during] [provide text event]. Use key [details/events] from the passage in your summary.
+
+## Worked examples (T2, specific slot fills)
+
+- theme / Multiple Choice → `stem "Which sentence best tells the theme of the passage?"` with the correct claim phrased as a lesson ("Keeping at something can matter more than winning.").
+- summary / Multi-Select → `stem "Choose two sentences that should be included in a summary of the story. Select two answers."` with `focus ["s1" "s2"]`.
+- theme / EBSR → Part A as above, `stem-b "Which sentence from the passage best supports your answer in Part A?"`.
+- theme / Hot Text → `stem "Click on the two sentences that best show the theme of the story. Choose two answers."` (author exactly two `directly-supports` sources).
+- summary / Short Text → `stem "Summarize what happens after the blue ribbon goes to somebody else. Use key details from the passage in your summary."` — scoped to a key event, not the whole story.
+
+---
+
 # Target 9 (`c1-t9`) — Central Ideas (informational)
 
 A **different skill** from Reasoning & Evidence: synthesize and condense — the **main/central
@@ -264,6 +383,63 @@ it); the student clicks the sentence(s) that show the main idea. The correct sen
 
 ---
 
+# Target 1 (`c1-t1`) — Key Details (**literary**)
+
+The **literary mirror of Target 8**: the inference/conclusion is **GIVEN in the stem**, and the
+student selects the **text evidence** that supports it. DOK **1–2**. Standard **RL-1 — and only
+RL-1** (unlike T8 the guideline names no companion, so a composed item's `standards` is just
+`rl-1`; omit `standard` and let the dimension resolve it). Dimension: `supporting-evidence`. Item
+types: `multiple-choice`, `multi-select`, `hot-text` (no EBSR, no constructed response).
+
+**Authoring:** identical to T8 — author ONE supported `claim` = the given inference (named by the
+outcome's `focus`) and **state that inference in the `stem`**; author `source`s for the options —
+`directly-supports` (the correct evidence; give a `quote` for the exact sentence) and
+`supports-wrong-claim` / `irrelevant` (the distractor evidence, each with a `rationale`). The
+options are the **sources**, not claims; there are no distractor claims.
+
+**Two literary differences from T8's wording:** these stems offer **`line`** as a selectable unit
+(matching L0175's numbered `lines`) and say **`[author/narrator]`** where T8 says only "author" —
+use "narrator" for a first-person story. Multi-Select is exactly **two** correct (T8 allows two or
+three).
+
+## Task Model 1 — Multiple Choice (`type multiple-choice`, single-answer, DOK 1–2)
+
+The stem states the inference and asks which evidence supports it:
+- Which [detail/sentence/line] from the passage best [supports/shows] [provide inference or conclusion based on the passage]?
+- [Provide inference or conclusion based on the passage]. Which [detail/sentence/line] from the passage best supports this [inference/conclusion] OR best shows [provide the inference or conclusion]?
+- The reader can [infer/conclude] [inference or conclusion based on the passage]. Which [detail/sentence/line] from the passage best supports this [inference/conclusion]?
+- The [author/narrator] [infers/concludes] that [inference/conclusion based on the passage]. Which [detail/sentence/line] from the passage best supports this [inference/conclusion]?
+- Read this [inference/conclusion]. [Provide inference or conclusion based on the passage]. Which [detail/sentence/line] from the passage best supports this [inference/conclusion]?
+
+## Task Model 2 — Multi-Select (`type multi-select`, choose two, DOK 1–2)
+
+- Choose two [details/sentences/lines] from the passage that best support the [inference/conclusion] that [provide inference or conclusion based on the passage].
+- Which [details/sentences/lines] from the passage best support [provide inference or conclusion based on the passage]? Select two answers.
+- [Provide inference or conclusion based on the passage]. Which [details/sentences/lines] from the passage best support this [inference/conclusion]? Select two answers.
+- The reader can [infer/conclude] [provide inference/conclusion based on the passage]. Which [details/sentences/lines] from the passage best support this [inference/conclusion]? Select two answers.
+- The [author/narrator] [infers/concludes] that [provide inference/conclusion based on the passage]. Which [details/sentences/lines] from the passage best support this [inference/conclusion]? Select two answers.
+
+## Task Model 3 — Hot Text (`type hot-text`, single-part select-text, DOK 1–2)
+
+Single-part: the authored `stem` states the inference and the click instruction (the compiler does
+not synthesize it); the student clicks the supporting sentence(s):
+- Click the [detail/sentence/set of sentences/line/paragraph] that best supports [provide inference or conclusion based on the passage].
+- Click [one/two] [details/sentences/sets of sentences/lines/paragraphs] that best support [provide inference or conclusion based on the passage].
+- [Provide inference or conclusion based on the passage]. Click the [detail/sentence/set of sentences/line/paragraph] that best supports this [inference/conclusion].
+- The reader can [infer/conclude] [provide inference/conclusion based on the passage]. Click [one/two] [details/sentences/lines] that best support this [inference/conclusion].
+- Read this [inference/conclusion]. [Provide inference or conclusion based on the text]. Click [one/two] [details/sentences/sets of sentences/lines/paragraphs] that best support this [inference/conclusion].
+
+## Worked examples (T1, specific slot fills)
+
+- supporting-evidence / Multiple Choice →
+  `stem "The reader can conclude that Nina takes care of a problem on her own, without being told to. Which line from the passage best supports this conclusion?"` with one supported `claim` (the inference) at `focus`, its directly-supporting `source` the correct option.
+- supporting-evidence / Multi-Select →
+  `stem "Nina takes care of a problem on her own, without being told to. Which two lines from the passage best support this conclusion? Select two answers."` (two `directly-supports` sources)
+- supporting-evidence / Hot Text (single-part) →
+  `stem "Read this conclusion. Nina takes care of a problem on her own, without being told to. Click the two sentences from the passage that best support this conclusion."`
+
+---
+
 # Target 8 (`c1-t8`) — Key Details (informational)
 
 A **different model**: the inference/conclusion is **GIVEN in the stem**, and the student selects

package/dist/static/targets.json

@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
+{
+  "revised": "2026-08-28",
+  "standardFamilies": {
+    "RL_G5": [
+      "rl-1",
+      "rl-2",
+      "rl-3",
+      "rl-4",
+      "rl-5",
+      "rl-6",
+      "rl-7",
+      "rl-9"
+    ],
+    "RI_G5": [
+      "ri-1",
+      "ri-2",
+      "ri-3",
+      "ri-4",
+      "ri-5",
+      "ri-6",
+      "ri-7",
+      "ri-8",
+      "ri-9"
+    ],
+    "L_G5": [
+      "l-4",
+      "l-4a",
+      "l-4b",
+      "l-4c",
+      "l-5",
+      "l-5a",
+      "l-5b",
+      "l-5c"
+    ]
+  },
+  "targets": {
+    "c1-t4": {
+      "id": "c1-t4",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 4 (Reasoning & Evidence)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "reasoning-evidence",
+      "textType": "literary",
+      "baseStandard": "rl-1",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok3",
+      "answerKind": "statement",
+      "singlePartHotText": false,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "ebsr",
+        "tm2": "hot-text",
+        "tm3": "short-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RL_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "character",
+        "setting",
+        "event",
+        "point-of-view",
+        "theme",
+        "topic",
+        "narrators-feelings",
+        "character-relationship"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [
+        "misreads-detail",
+        "erroneous-inference",
+        "faulty-reasoning"
+      ],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "character": "rl-3",
+        "character-relationship": "rl-3",
+        "setting": "rl-3",
+        "event": "rl-3",
+        "point-of-view": "rl-6",
+        "narrators-feelings": "rl-6",
+        "theme": "rl-2",
+        "topic": "rl-2"
+      }
+    },
+    "c1-t11": {
+      "id": "c1-t11",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 11 (Reasoning & Evidence)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "reasoning-evidence",
+      "textType": "informational",
+      "baseStandard": "ri-1",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok3",
+      "answerKind": "statement",
+      "singlePartHotText": false,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "ebsr",
+        "tm2": "hot-text",
+        "tm3": "short-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RI_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "relationships-interactions",
+        "author-use-of-information",
+        "point-of-view",
+        "purpose",
+        "authors-opinion"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [
+        "misreads-detail",
+        "erroneous-inference",
+        "faulty-reasoning"
+      ],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "relationships-interactions": "ri-3",
+        "author-use-of-information": "ri-8",
+        "point-of-view": "ri-6",
+        "purpose": "ri-8",
+        "authors-opinion": "ri-8"
+      }
+    },
+    "c1-t2": {
+      "id": "c1-t2",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 2 (Central Ideas)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "central-ideas",
+      "textType": "literary",
+      "baseStandard": "rl-1",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok2",
+      "answerKind": "statement",
+      "singlePartHotText": true,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "multiple-choice",
+        "tm2": "multi-select",
+        "tm3": "ebsr",
+        "tm4": "hot-text",
+        "tm5": "short-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RL_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "theme",
+        "central-idea",
+        "key-detail",
+        "summary"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [
+        "too-narrow",
+        "too-broad",
+        "misreads-detail",
+        "insignificant"
+      ],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "theme": "rl-2",
+        "central-idea": "rl-2",
+        "key-detail": "rl-2",
+        "summary": "rl-2"
+      }
+    },
+    "c1-t9": {
+      "id": "c1-t9",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 9 (Central Ideas)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "central-ideas",
+      "textType": "informational",
+      "baseStandard": "ri-1",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok2",
+      "answerKind": "statement",
+      "singlePartHotText": true,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "multiple-choice",
+        "tm2": "multi-select",
+        "tm3": "ebsr",
+        "tm4": "hot-text",
+        "tm5": "short-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RI_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "central-idea",
+        "key-detail",
+        "summary"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [
+        "too-narrow",
+        "too-broad",
+        "misreads-detail",
+        "insignificant"
+      ],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "central-idea": "ri-2",
+        "key-detail": "ri-2",
+        "summary": "ri-2"
+      }
+    },
+    "c1-t1": {
+      "id": "c1-t1",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 1 (Key Details)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "key-details",
+      "textType": "literary",
+      "baseStandard": "rl-1",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok2",
+      "answerKind": "evidence",
+      "singlePartHotText": true,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "multiple-choice",
+        "tm2": "multi-select",
+        "tm3": "hot-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RL_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "supporting-evidence"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "supporting-evidence": "rl-1"
+      }
+    },
+    "c1-t8": {
+      "id": "c1-t8",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 8 (Key Details)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "key-details",
+      "textType": "informational",
+      "baseStandard": "ri-1",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok2",
+      "answerKind": "evidence",
+      "singlePartHotText": true,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "multiple-choice",
+        "tm2": "multi-select",
+        "tm3": "hot-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RI_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "supporting-evidence"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "supporting-evidence": "ri-7"
+      }
+    },
+    "c1-t10": {
+      "id": "c1-t10",
+      "label": "Grade 5 · Claim 1 · Target 10 (Word Meanings)",
+      "grade": 5,
+      "skill": "word-meanings",
+      "textType": "informational",
+      "baseStandard": "ri-4",
+      "defaultDok": "r-dok2",
+      "answerKind": "meaning",
+      "singlePartHotText": false,
+      "taskModels": {
+        "tm1": "multiple-choice",
+        "tm2": "multi-select",
+        "tm3": "hot-text"
+      },
+      "standards": [
+        "RI_G5",
+        "L_G5"
+      ],
+      "dimensions": [
+        "word-meaning"
+      ],
+      "errorTypes": [
+        "other-meaning",
+        "misinterprets",
+        "wrong-context"
+      ],
+      "dimStandard": {
+        "word-meaning": "l-4"
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}

package/dist/static/template.gc

@@ -1,67 +1,7 @@
-/* Revised: 2026-06-20 */
-target c1-t4
-passage "The Tide Pool"
-type literary
-/* lines are PARAGRAPHS (auto-numbered 1..N). EBSR Part B sources add a `quote` with the exact
-   supporting sentence so options stay sentence-tight while `line` points at the paragraph. */
-lines [
-  "Mara crouched at the edge of the tide pool, ignoring the picnic her family had spread out behind her. Her brother called twice, but she did not turn around. A tiny crab scuttled under a rock, and Mara smiled for the first time all day."
-  "She had spent the whole car ride staring out the window, saying nothing. Now her fingers traced the cold water as if the pool were the only thing that mattered. \"Five more minutes,\" she whispered, though no one was listening."
-  "Behind her, paper plates rustled and her mother laughed at someone's joke. Mara did not hear them."
-]
-claims [
-  claim id "c1" status supported dimension character subject "Mara" standard rl-1 dok r-dok3
-    text "Mara is more interested in the tide pool than in her family's picnic."
-    rationale "Paragraphs 1 and 2 show Mara absorbed by the tide pool while she ignores her family."
-    cites ["e1" "e2" "e3" "e4"] {}
-  claim id "c5" status supported dimension character subject "the brother"
-    text "Mara's brother wants her attention."
-    cites ["e2"] {}
-  /* Distractors target the question(s) they foil (here, all foil the Mara items q1/q2/q3). */
-  claim id "c2" status distractor error-type misreads-detail plausibility 0.85 targets ["q1" "q2" "q3"]
-    text "Mara is angry at her brother for calling her."
-    rationale "Misreads 'she did not turn around': absorption, not anger."
-    cites ["e2"] {}
-  claim id "c6" status distractor error-type misreads-detail plausibility 0.6 targets ["q1" "q2" "q3"]
-    text "Mara is bored and impatient to leave."
-    rationale "Misreads her stillness as boredom; the crab makes her smile — delight, not boredom."
-    cites ["e6"] {}
-  claim id "c3" status distractor error-type erroneous-inference plausibility 0.55 targets ["q1" "q2" "q3"]
-    text "Mara dislikes spending time outdoors."
-    rationale "Over-generalizes from her quiet to a dislike her smile at the crab contradicts."
-    cites ["e6"] {}
-  claim id "c7" status distractor error-type erroneous-inference plausibility 0.5 targets ["q1" "q2" "q3"]
-    text "Mara wishes she were somewhere else with her friends."
-    rationale "Invents an off-text desire; nothing in the passage mentions friends."
-    cites ["e7"] {}
-  claim id "c4" status distractor error-type faulty-reasoning plausibility 0.45 targets ["q1" "q2" "q3"]
-    text "Because Mara whispers, she must be afraid of her family."
-    rationale "Whispering is treated as fear without textual support."
-    cites ["e5"] {}
-  claim id "c8" status distractor error-type faulty-reasoning plausibility 0.4 targets ["q1" "q2" "q3"]
-    text "Because Mara ignores the picnic, she must not love her family."
-    rationale "Leaps from one moment of focus to a sweeping claim about her feelings."
-    cites ["e6"] {}
-]
-evidence [
-  source id "e1" line 1 quote "Mara crouched at the edge of the tide pool, ignoring the picnic her family had spread out behind her." status directly-supports supports ["c1"] {}
-  source id "e2" line 1 quote "Her brother called twice, but she did not turn around." status supports-wrong-claim supports ["c1" "c2"]
-    rationale "Real evidence, but props up the 'anger' misreading, not the inference." {}
-  source id "e3" line 1 quote "A tiny crab scuttled under a rock, and Mara smiled for the first time all day." status directly-supports supports ["c1"] {}
-  source id "e4" line 2 quote "Now her fingers traced the cold water as if the pool were the only thing that mattered." status directly-supports supports ["c1"] {}
-  source id "e5" line 2 quote "\"Five more minutes,\" she whispered, though no one was listening." status supports-wrong-claim supports ["c4"]
-    rationale "Her whisper is real, but it shows focus, not fear." {}
-  source id "e6" line 3 quote "Behind her, paper plates rustled and her mother laughed at someone's joke." status irrelevant supports [] {}
-  source id "e7" line 3 quote "Mara did not hear them." status irrelevant supports [] {}
-  source id "e8" line 2 quote "She had spent the whole car ride staring out the window, saying nothing." status irrelevant supports [] {}
-]
-outcomes [
-  outcome id "q1" type ebsr dimension character subject "Mara" standard rl-1 focus "c1"
-    stem "Which of these inferences about Mara is supported by the passage?"
-    stem-b "Which sentence(s) from the passage best support your answer in Part A?" {}
-  outcome id "q2" type short-text dimension character subject "Mara" standard rl-1 focus "c1"
-    stem "What inference can be made about Mara? Explain using key details from the passage to support your answer." {}
-  outcome id "q3" type hot-text dimension character subject "Mara" standard rl-1 focus "c1"
-    stem "Click on the statement that best provides an inference about Mara that is supported by the passage." {}
-]
-{}..
+passage "Title"
+  type literary
+  lines [
+    "Line one."
+  ] claims []
+  evidence []
+  outcomes [] {}..

package/dist/static/unparse-hints.json

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+{
+  "LINES": "treat lines as paragraphs in the original passage"
+}