@garygentry/feature-forge 0.3.1 → 0.3.4

package/adapters/claude/skills/forge-2-tech/SKILL.md

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ Read and follow `references/shared-conventions.md` for feature name validation,
 
 **Prerequisite check:** Read `{resolvedFeatureDir}/.pipeline-state.json`. If not in force mode and `forge-1-prd` is not `complete`, STOP and tell the user: "The PRD for '{feature}' isn't complete yet. Run `/feature-forge:forge-1-prd {feature}` first."
 
+**Carried-over note check.** If that state's top-level `notes` is a non-empty string, surface it verbatim before proceeding and treat it as input to this stage — it was persisted for exactly this cross-session handoff (often at the previous stage's exit). It never overrides the PRD or config; raise any conflict instead of silently following either side.
+
 After the prerequisite check, invoke the **Stage-Entry Guard** block in `references/shared-conventions.md` with `{stage}` = `forge-2-tech` — it detects an interrupted or already-complete tech-spec, runs the resume/restart or new-version gate, and stamps `status: "in-progress"` + `startedAt` + `currentStage` before the research and interview.
 
 Read `{resolvedFeatureDir}/PRD.md` into context. This is your foundation — every technology decision must trace back to a PRD requirement.
@@ -92,7 +94,15 @@ Interview the user about technology decisions. Unlike the PRD interview, here yo
 - Ask about every integration point and how the feature interacts with existing modules.
 - For competing module structures or code-shape choices, use the `AskUserQuestion` `preview` field to show the candidates side-by-side.
 
-**Parking lot:** If the user raises a concern that belongs to a different pipeline stage (e.g., backlog granularity, documentation format), acknowledge it and note it in the pipeline state's `notes` field: "Good point — I've noted that for the [specs/backlog/docs stage]. Let's continue with the tech spec."
+**Parking lot:** If the user raises a concern that belongs to a different pipeline stage (e.g., backlog granularity, documentation format), acknowledge it and persist it **immediately, at the moment it is raised** — never deferred to stage closure — by running `state-note` (fenced immediately below) with a concise one-line statement of the concern, then say "Good point — I've noted that for the [specs/backlog/docs stage]. Let's continue with the tech spec." Add `--epic "{epic}"` to that call when this feature is an epic member — required, per the Pipeline State Protocol in `references/shared-conventions.md`; omitting it for a member is an error and must never fall back to a same-named flat feature. `state-note` **overwrites** the single top-level `notes` string rather than appending, so when a note already exists, read the current `notes` value out of the feature's `.pipeline-state.json` first and pass one combined concise string in a single `--note` — never edit or round-trip the JSON by hand. This interview-time call is separate from the optional completion note in Step 6 and must not be folded into it. If the call exits 2, surface the `Error:` line verbatim with the named feature (and epic) and the recovery instruction, and **stop claiming the concern was recorded** — it was not. The full recipe is single-sourced as **Immediate Downstream Note (Parking Lot)** in `references/shared-conventions.md`.
+
+```bash
+R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
+[ -n "$R" ] || { echo "feature-forge: cannot locate plugin root" >&2; exit 1; }
+python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" state-note \
+  --feature "{feature}" --note "<concise downstream concern>" \
+  --specs-dir "{specsDir}"
+```
 
 **Epic-level concern (backflow):** The parking lot above is for concerns about a *later stage of THIS feature*. If instead the design reveals the **epic decomposition itself** is wrong — a **sibling feature must be added**, a **frozen boundary between features must move**, a feature must **split**, or a **dependency edge is wrong** — that is an *epic-level* concern and does **not** go in `notes`. It only applies when this feature is an epic member (its `.pipeline-state.json` has an `epic` back-pointer); for a standalone feature there is no epic to reconcile. To record one, run `state-ecr` (fenced below) with `--kind` (`add-feature`|`redep`|`move-boundary`|`split`), `--target`, `--rationale`, `--raised-by forge-2-tech` and `--blocks-current` — it appends the entry to the member state's `epicChangeRequests[]` array, filling in `raisedAt` (ISO-8601 UTC) and `status: "open"` for you. Set `blocksCurrent: true` when the change alters a contract (`exposes`/`consumes`) or dependency edge this feature relies on for its *next* stage — proceeding to specs would build on a soon-to-change decomposition (this is the point of no cheap return, so bias toward `true`); `false` for a peer/downstream change this feature does not consume. When a contract/dep edge is touched and the classification is ambiguous, confirm `blocksCurrent` with a single `AskUserQuestion`, defaulting to `true`. **Do not** edit `epic-manifest.json` here — recording is not applying; only `/feature-forge:forge-0-epic` edit mode mutates the epic. Then acknowledge without blocking and continue the tech spec.
 
@@ -184,6 +194,8 @@ Unresolved technical decisions.
 
 ## Step 6: Review with User
 
+This is a **blocking review** — per the **Stage Review Gate** in `references/shared-conventions.md`, do not proceed until the user confirms.
+
 Present the complete tech spec. Ask:
 - "Does this capture all the technical decisions correctly?"
 - "Any patterns from the existing codebase I missed?"
@@ -198,7 +210,7 @@ Before writing state or running the stage exit, invoke the **Stage-Completion Re
 Pipeline state is written by the `state-*` verbs — see the Pipeline State Protocol in `references/shared-conventions.md`.
 
 1. Record completion by running `state-complete` (below) with `--version`, one `--artifact` per file this stage produced, and `--based-on forge-1-prd=<current forge-1-prd version>`. It sets `status: "complete"`, `completedAt`, the version and `basedOnVersions`, and applies the downstream staleness cascade deterministically, so no downstream status is set by hand.
-2. **Offer a note — don't force one.** As a statement (not a blocking question), let the user know they can jot anything worth preserving across sessions and you'll store it in the `notes` field. If they volunteer something, store it; otherwise proceed.
+2. **Offer a note — don't force one.** As a statement (not a blocking question), let the user know they can jot anything worth preserving across sessions and you'll store it in the `notes` field. If they volunteer something, store it via `state-note` — it **overwrites** the single `notes` string (latest note wins), so fold any still-relevant existing note into the one combined string; otherwise proceed. The next stage's Step 1 reads and surfaces this note.
 3. If `gitCommitAfterStage` is true, follow the Git Commit Protocol in `references/shared-conventions.md`: stage files, attempt commit with message `"{commitPrefix}({feature}): complete tech-spec v{n}"` (marking `stages.forge-2-tech.status` `complete` with `commitHash: null` in that commit), then record the artifact-commit hash via the protocol's two-commit follow-up (never `--amend`) only on success. If commit fails, leave status as `in-progress`.
 4. **Close with the Stage Exit Protocol** (single-sourced in `references/stage-exit-protocol.md`; do not improvise a "Next steps" list):
 
@@ -215,15 +227,17 @@ python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" state-note \
   --feature "{feature}" --note "<what the user volunteered>" --specs-dir "{specsDir}"
 ```
 
+**Determine `--verify-capability` before running the exit** (full rule: `references/stage-exit-protocol.md`; summary: **Verify Capability** in `references/shared-conventions.md`). Pass `interactive` only when a question mechanism equivalent to `AskUserQuestion` is available **and** a clean-room `forge-verifier` may be dispatched; otherwise pass `manual`. Dispatch capability means **permitted** dispatch, not a listed tool — the test is "may I dispatch `forge-verifier` right now", not "is a dispatch tool in my tool surface". A session that bars *unsolicited* dispatch while offering a question mechanism is therefore **`interactive`, not `manual`**: the gate's affirmative choice is the user request that authorizes the dispatch. Such a bar is never grounds to skip verification, and never grounds to fence the production successor while verification is unresolved — on the `runInStageVerify: true` path the emitted `verifyGate` stays `none`, so reuse the Standard Verify Gate block for consent with **choice 2 omitted**, leaving exactly two choices: *Verify now* (recommended) and *Skip for now*. The clean-room `forge-verifier` is **dispatched on the affirmative choice**, never merely printed for the user to run later; *Skip for now* is persisted as an explicit `skipped` before any advancing block. Add `--epic "{epic}"` to the call below when this feature is an epic member.
+
 **Close this stage with the Scripted Stage Exit** (contract: `references/stage-exit-protocol.md`; do not improvise a "Next steps" list). Run:
 
 ```bash
 R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
 [ -n "$R" ] || { echo "feature-forge: cannot locate plugin root" >&2; exit 1; }
-python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" stage-exit --feature "{feature}" --stage forge-2-tech --specs-dir "{specsDir}" --host claude
+python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" stage-exit --feature "{feature}" --stage forge-2-tech --specs-dir "{specsDir}" --host claude --verify-capability "{verify-capability}"
 ```
 
-Obey the DIRECTIVES it prints, in order, per the directive contract: `runInStageVerify: true` → dispatch the in-stage clean-room verify now (honoring `autoFixEligible`); `verifyGate: "standard"` → present the Standard Verify Gate; `verifyGate: "manual-print"` → print the `verifyCommand` for the user; non-empty `invalidAutoVerifyKeys` → print a one-line warning. Then **print the NEXT-STEPS block verbatim as your absolute last output — nothing after its sentinel line.**
+Obey the DIRECTIVES it prints, in the consumption order this protocol fixes: surface `invalidAutoVerifyKeys` and every `warnings` entry first; `runInStageVerify: true` → run the in-stage clean-room verify chain now (honoring `autoFixEligible`, and asking through the Standard Verify Gate first when you may not dispatch unsolicited); `verifyGate: "standard"` → present the Standard Verify Gate; `verifyGate: "manual-print"` → print the `verifyCommand` for the user and do **not** dispatch inline. Then, and only when `terminalOwnedBy` is `"self"`, **print the NEXT-STEPS block verbatim as your absolute last output — nothing after its sentinel line.** A `terminalOwnedBy: "outer"` payload carries `nextSteps: null`: return your structured result to the caller and print no terminal block at all.
 
 ## Gotchas
 

package/adapters/claude/skills/forge-2-tech/references/shared-conventions.md

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ I found that the codebase uses React and TanStack Router.
 
 ### Decision Support: Help the User Choose
 
-When an `AskUserQuestion` carries substantive options (a real choice — not a trivial yes/no confirmation), do not just list them. The interview stages have already done codebase research and integration analysis; surfacing that synthesis at the decision moment is the whole point. For every such question:
+When a question posed through `AskUserQuestion` carries substantive options (a real choice — not a trivial yes/no confirmation), do not just list them. The interview stages have already done codebase research and integration analysis; surfacing that synthesis at the decision moment is the whole point. For every such question:
 
 - **Lead with a recommended option.** Place it first and label it `(recommended)` (matching the `AskUserQuestion` "(Recommended)" convention).
 - **Put the trade-off in each option's `description`.** Say why you'd pick it and what you give up versus the alternatives — the cost, not just the benefit.
@@ -53,6 +53,17 @@ For genuinely comparable artifacts (competing module structures, two code snippe
 
 The **Branch Setup** block below is the reference pattern: a strong recommendation as the first option, rationale inline, the alternative still available, never a hard-stop.
 
+## Stage Review Gate
+
+Every authoring stage ends its "Review with User" step in exactly one of two shapes. Which shape a stage uses is declared **here, once** — each stage's review step points at this block by title, and the shape is never re-derived from the surrounding prose or inferred from how sibling stages behave (three stages block and one does not; majority-shape inference is precisely the failure this block exists to prevent):
+
+- **Blocking review (gate).** The stage presents the artifact and collects feedback through `AskUserQuestion`; it does **not** proceed until the user answers, iterating until they confirm. Stages: **forge-1-prd** (Step 5), **forge-2-tech** (Step 6), **forge-3-specs** (Step 6).
+- **Non-blocking review (invitation).** The stage states the artifact is ready and invites adjustments **as a statement, not a question** — and then **proceeds to the next step in the same turn unless the user asks for changes**. The invitation obliges the agent to *continue*: emitting the invitation sentence and stopping treats the non-gate as a gate and strands the stage `in-progress` with its completion step unrun — a defect, not caution. Stage: **forge-4-backlog** (Step 6).
+
+**Why the shapes differ.** A blocking review guards an artifact whose content was just authored from open-ended interview or synthesis — the user is the only authority on "complete", so the stage must wait. forge-4's backlog is *derived* from specs the user already approved, was planned interactively in its Step 3, and is machine-validated in its Step 5; a second hard gate would re-ask a settled question, and the loop never launches without forge-5-loop's own Step 2d confirmation anyway. The invitation is a courtesy checkpoint, not an approval gate (removed deliberately in #78's consistency sweep).
+
+A stage that changes shape changes it **in this block first**; the per-stage pointer stays a pointer.
+
 ## Configuration Reading
 
 Read `forge.config.json` from the project root. If it doesn't exist, use defaults.
@@ -130,7 +141,7 @@ mkdir -p "<specsDir>"
 [ -f "<specsDir>/AGENTS.md" ] || cp "$R/references/templates/specs-hygiene/AGENTS.md" "<specsDir>/AGENTS.md"
 ```
 
-If the host is Claude (the `AskUserQuestion` tool is available), also ensure the Claude-framed variant:
+If the host is Claude (the Claude-native question tool is available), also ensure the Claude-framed variant:
 
 ```bash
 R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
@@ -191,6 +202,44 @@ Pipeline state is written by the `state-*` verbs of `scripts/forge-session.py`
 
 If a `state-*` verb exits 2, surface the plain `Error:` line from stderr verbatim, do **not** proceed to the next step of the surrounding protocol, and do **not** hand-author the JSON as a workaround. The stage remains resumable because the entry stamp is already on disk — re-run the verb once the cause is fixed.
 
+**The nine `state-*` verbs.** `state-enter` (Stage-Entry Guard), `state-artifact` (incremental artifact tracking), `state-complete` (Git Commit Protocol), `state-skip` (the deliberate forge-6-docs documentation skip — scoped to that one stage; writes `status: "skipped"` + `skippedAt`, refuses to erase a record of docs that exist, and is the only sanctioned writer of a skipped docs stage), `state-branch` (Branch Setup and Branch Reconciliation), `state-note` (the Immediate Downstream Note below, and the optional completion note at stage closure), `state-decision` (deferred decisions), `state-ecr` (epic change requests), and `state-verify` (one `forge-verify-*` verification transition — below). The `--epic` member requirement and the exit-2 failure protocol above apply to **every** one of them, `state-verify` included; no verify entry is ever hand-authored.
+
+### `state-verify` — verification results and provenance
+
+`state-verify` writes exactly one `stages.forge-verify-{token}` entry — the verification result for the production stage named by `--stage` — plus the top-level `updatedAt`, and nothing else. `--stage` takes the **served production stage** (`forge-0-epic` through `forge-5-loop`; `forge-6-docs` has no verification token and is rejected). Add `--epic "{epic}"` when the feature is an epic member — required, per the member rule above. Result mode passes `--status` (`auto-verify-pending`, `passed`, `findings-reported`, `findings-applied`, or `skipped`) with whatever `--findings-file`, `--findings-count`, and `--verified-stage-version` that status requires; contradictory metadata is refused before any write. `passed` may additionally carry `--findings-file` + `--findings-count` together for an **advisory-only** report (`inconsistency`/`improvement` findings only, per forge-verify's severity floor) — the stage resolves without a fix round and the report stays attached:
+
+**`auto-verify-pending` is not a skill-facing status.** It is written by `stage-exit`'s scheduling boundary, which records the debt automatically when auto-verify is effective for a stage. The value is accepted on this CLI so the entry stays inspectable and repairable, not so a skill can hand-schedule verification: no skill body and no reference passes it, and none should. Every other status in the list is the recorded *result* of a verification that ran (or was explicitly skipped); this one records that one was *owed*.
+
+```bash
+R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
+[ -n "$R" ] || { echo "feature-forge: cannot locate plugin root" >&2; exit 1; }
+python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" state-verify \
+  --feature "{feature}" --stage "{served-production-stage}" --status "<status>" \
+  --specs-dir "{specsDir}"
+```
+
+Provenance follows the same two-commit sequence as `state-complete`: the result transition above writes `commitHash: null`, Commit 1 records the findings document and the state, and a second `state-verify` call records the full 40-hex hash of Commit 1 and touches nothing else (never `--amend`; an abbreviated hash is refused rather than expanded). Add `--epic "{epic}"` for an epic member — required, per the member rule above:
+
+```bash
+R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
+[ -n "$R" ] || { echo "feature-forge: cannot locate plugin root" >&2; exit 1; }
+python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" state-verify \
+  --feature "{feature}" --stage "{served-production-stage}" \
+  --commit-hash "$(git rev-parse HEAD)" --specs-dir "{specsDir}"
+```
+
+Epic-scoped verification is the single exception to the member rule: with `--stage forge-0-epic`, `--feature` names the **epic** and `--epic` must be absent or exactly equal to it. That call writes `{specsDir}/{epic}/.epic-state.json` and never a member's `.pipeline-state.json`, and its freshness version is the epic manifest's `revision`, never a member's stage version:
+
+```bash
+R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
+[ -n "$R" ] || { echo "feature-forge: cannot locate plugin root" >&2; exit 1; }
+python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" state-verify \
+  --feature "{epic}" --stage forge-0-epic --status "<status>" \
+  --specs-dir "{specsDir}"
+```
+
+On exit 2 the verification result is **not** recorded: surface the `Error:` line verbatim, name the feature (and epic), and do not claim the verification was persisted or advance past it.
+
 ### Staleness Detection (Read-Time)
 
 When loading upstream artifacts as prerequisites, check `basedOnVersions` in the pipeline state for this stage. If any upstream stage's current version is newer than the version recorded in `basedOnVersions`, warn the user before proceeding:
@@ -199,6 +248,31 @@ When loading upstream artifacts as prerequisites, check `basedOnVersions` in the
 
 Frame the choice with its cost: re-running re-derives this stage from the current upstream (safest, but discards any hand-edits to this stage's artifacts); proceeding stale is faster but risks baking outdated assumptions into everything downstream. Recommend re-running unless the user knows the upstream change doesn't affect this stage.
 
+## Immediate Downstream Note (Parking Lot)
+
+When an interview raises a concern that belongs to a *later stage of this same feature*, acknowledge it and persist it **immediately, at the moment it is raised** — not at stage closure — by running `state-note` with a concise one-line statement of the concern. Add `--epic "{epic}"` when this feature is an epic member — required, per the Pipeline State Protocol above; omitting it for a member is an error and must never be allowed to fall back to a same-named flat feature.
+
+```bash
+R="$(bash -c 'for d in "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}" "$HOME"/.claude/skills/feature-forge "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/cache/*/feature-forge/* "$HOME"/.claude/plugins/*/feature-forge "$HOME"/.agents/skills/feature-forge ./.agents/skills/feature-forge; do [ -x "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh" ] && exec "$d/scripts/forge-root.sh"; done')"
+[ -n "$R" ] || { echo "feature-forge: cannot locate plugin root" >&2; exit 1; }
+python3 "$R/scripts/forge-session.py" state-note \
+  --feature "{feature}" --note "<concise downstream concern>" \
+  --specs-dir "{specsDir}"
+```
+
+`state-note` **overwrites** the single top-level `notes` string — it does not append. To preserve an earlier note, read the current `notes` value out of the feature's `.pipeline-state.json` first and pass one combined concise string in a single `--note`; never edit or round-trip the JSON by hand. This interview-time call is separate from the optional completion note offered at stage closure and must not be deferred until then — a session that ends before closure would otherwise lose the concern entirely.
+
+On `UsageError`/exit 2, surface the `Error:` line verbatim together with the named feature (and epic) and the recovery instruction, and **stop claiming the concern was recorded** — it was not. Epic *decomposition* changes are not notes: they go through `state-ecr` into `epicChangeRequests`, never into `notes`.
+
+## Verify Capability
+
+Skills that close a stage pass `--verify-capability interactive|manual` to `stage-exit`. The full determination rule, the Standard Verify Gate, and the recovery path live in `references/stage-exit-protocol.md`; the two facts that are most often gotten wrong:
+
+- **Dispatch capability is *permitted* dispatch, not a listed tool.** The question is "**may I dispatch `forge-verifier` right now**", not "is a subagent-dispatch tool in my tool surface". A session can carry a standing host instruction against dispatching subagents unless the user asked; such instructions are injected by the harness, sit outside this project's control, and outrank skill prose. Classify on permission, up front.
+- **A consent requirement is `interactive`, not `manual`.** When dispatch is barred only *unless the user asked* and a question mechanism is available, pass `interactive`: the gate's own affirmative choice supplies the missing user request. Pass `manual` only when there is **no** question mechanism **and** **no** permitted dispatch.
+
+A bar on unsolicited dispatch is never grounds to skip verification, and never grounds to fence the production successor while verification is unresolved. On the `runInStageVerify: true` path the emitted `verifyGate` stays `none`: reuse the Standard Verify Gate block for consent with **choice 2 omitted** (auto-verify is already effective, so "enable auto-verify going forward" is a no-op), leaving exactly two choices: *Verify now* (recommended) and *Skip for now*. The clean-room `forge-verifier` is **dispatched on the affirmative choice**, never merely printed for the user to run later; *Skip for now* is persisted as an explicit `skipped` before any advancing block.
+
 ## Branch Setup
 
 Invoke this block at the **very start** of a pipeline entry point — `forge-1-prd` (standalone feature) and `forge-0-epic` (epic) — **before** any directory resolution or interview, so the rest of the run lands on the intended branch. `{label}` is the feature name (forge-1-prd) or epic name (forge-0-epic); `{scope}` is `feature` or `epic` correspondingly.
@@ -332,7 +406,7 @@ Invoke this block **at the head of any post-entry step that writes a stage artif
 
 1. **Proceed** when `stages.{stage}.status` is `"in-progress"` (this session's Entry Stamp — you are finishing the run you started) or absent/`pending`. Run the write / exit normally.
 
-2. **Detect-and-refuse** when ALL of these hold: `stages.{stage}.status ∈ {"complete", "stale"}` **AND** the stage's artifacts (incl. `TRACEABILITY.md` for forge-3-specs) exist on disk **AND** a `commitHash` is recorded for the stage **AND** you did **not** author this stage earlier in the current session. This is a stale/replayed continuation of an already-finished, committed stage. Do **not** overwrite the artifact or re-run the exit. Route instead to the **Stage-Entry Guard**'s *Re-authoring* path: surface the same `AskUserQuestion` warning ("A completed {stage} artifact already exists for '{feature}' (v{n}{, marked stale}). Continuing will create a new version. Proceed?"). Only on explicit confirmation re-enter from the Entry Stamp (the version bumps at exit); otherwise **stop** and report that the stage is already complete — cite the recorded `commitHash` and offer `/feature-forge:forge {feature}` to see true state.
+2. **Detect-and-refuse** when ALL of these hold: `stages.{stage}.status ∈ {"complete", "stale"}` **AND** the stage's artifacts (incl. `TRACEABILITY.md` for forge-3-specs) exist on disk **AND** a `commitHash` is recorded for the stage **AND** you did **not** author this stage earlier in the current session. This is a stale/replayed continuation of an already-finished, committed stage. Do **not** overwrite the artifact or re-run the exit. Route instead to the **Stage-Entry Guard**'s *Re-authoring* path: surface the same warning via `AskUserQuestion` ("A completed {stage} artifact already exists for '{feature}' (v{n}{, marked stale}). Continuing will create a new version. Proceed?"). Only on explicit confirmation re-enter from the Entry Stamp (the version bumps at exit); otherwise **stop** and report that the stage is already complete — cite the recorded `commitHash` and offer `/feature-forge:forge {feature}` to see true state.
 
 When you cannot confirm you authored the current run, treat it as a replay and refuse: a false refuse costs one confirmation click; a false proceed overwrites a committed artifact and re-churns a stage version. `--force` follows Force Mode (skip the gate, treat as a deliberate re-author).