@friggframework/devtools 2.0.0-next.44 → 2.0.0-next.46

package/infrastructure/domains/health/docs/TDD-IMPLEMENTATION-SUMMARY.md

@@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
+# TDD Implementation Summary - Template Comparison Fix
+
+**Date**: 2025-10-27
+**Problem**: `frigg repair --import` generates wrong logical IDs (ImportedResource1, ImportedResource2)
+**Solution**: Template comparison with intelligent logical ID mapping
+**Architecture**: TDD, DDD, Hexagonal Architecture
+
+## 📊 Test Results
+
+### Domain Layer Tests
+
+**TemplateParser** (`template-parser.test.js`):
+- ✅ 21 tests passed
+- Coverage: Template parsing, VPC resource extraction, hardcoded ID extraction, Ref extraction
+- File operations, edge cases, error conditions
+
+**LogicalIdMapper** (`logical-id-mapper.test.js`):
+- ✅ 20 tests passed
+- Coverage: CloudFormation tag matching, VPC containment analysis, Lambda usage patterns
+- AWS SDK mocking, confidence level assignment, unmapped resource handling
+
+### Application Layer Tests
+
+**RepairViaImportUseCase** (`repair-via-import-use-case.test.js`):
+- ✅ 17 tests passed
+- Coverage: Template comparison orchestration, CloudFormation import format generation
+- Multi-resource warnings, mapped/unmapped separation, error conditions
+
+**Total: 58 tests passing ✅**
+
+## 🏗️ Architecture Layers
+
+### Domain Layer (Business Logic)
+
+**TemplateParser** (`domain/services/template-parser.js` - 265 lines):
+```javascript
+class TemplateParser {
+  parseTemplate(template)                  // Parse from file or object
+  getVpcResources(template)                // Extract VPC-related resources
+  extractHardcodedIds(template)            // Find physical IDs in deployed template
+  extractRefs(template)                    // Find Ref expressions in build template
+  findLogicalIdForPhysicalId()             // Match physical → logical
+  static getBuildTemplatePath()            // Get .serverless/cloudformation-template-update-stack.json
+  static buildTemplateExists()             // Check if build template exists
+}
+```
+
+**LogicalIdMapper** (`domain/services/logical-id-mapper.js` - 313 lines):
+```javascript
+class LogicalIdMapper {
+  async mapOrphanedResourcesToLogicalIds() // Orchestrate mapping strategies
+
+  // Strategy 1: CloudFormation tags (HIGH confidence)
+  _getLogicalIdFromTags(tags)
+
+  // Strategy 2: VPC containment analysis (HIGH confidence)
+  async _matchVpcByContainedResources()
+
+  // Strategy 3: Lambda VPC usage (MEDIUM confidence)
+  async _matchSubnetByVpcAndUsage()
+  async _matchSecurityGroupByUsage()
+}
+```
+
+### Application Layer (Use Cases)
+
+**RepairViaImportUseCase** (`application/use-cases/repair-via-import-use-case.js`):
+```javascript
+class RepairViaImportUseCase {
+  async importWithLogicalIdMapping({
+    stackIdentifier,
+    orphanedResources,
+    buildTemplatePath
+  })
+
+  // Returns:
+  {
+    success: true,
+    mappedCount: 2,
+    unmappedCount: 0,
+    mappings: [
+      { logicalId: 'FriggVPC', physicalId: 'vpc-...', matchMethod: 'tag', confidence: 'high' }
+    ],
+    resourcesToImport: [
+      { ResourceType: 'AWS::EC2::VPC', LogicalResourceId: 'FriggVPC', ResourceIdentifier: { VpcId: '...' } }
+    ],
+    warnings: []
+  }
+}
+```
+
+### Presentation Layer (CLI)
+
+**repair-command** (`../../../frigg-cli/repair-command/index.js`):
+```javascript
+async function handleImportRepair(stackIdentifier, report, options) {
+  // 1. Check for build template
+  const buildTemplatePath = TemplateParser.getBuildTemplatePath();
+  const buildTemplateExists = TemplateParser.buildTemplateExists();
+
+  if (!buildTemplateExists) {
+    // Fallback to sequential IDs with warning
+  }
+
+  // 2. Execute template comparison
+  const mappingResult = await repairUseCase.importWithLogicalIdMapping({
+    stackIdentifier,
+    orphanedResources,
+    buildTemplatePath
+  });
+
+  // 3. Display results with confidence levels
+  // 4. Show multi-resource warnings
+  // 5. Confirm with user
+  // 6. Execute import (TODO)
+}
+```
+
+## 🎯 Matching Strategies
+
+### Strategy 1: CloudFormation Tags (HIGH Confidence)
+
+Checks for `aws:cloudformation:logical-id` tag on resources.
+
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+{
+  Tags: [
+    { Key: 'aws:cloudformation:stack-name', Value: 'acme-integrations-dev' },
+    { Key: 'aws:cloudformation:logical-id', Value: 'FriggVPC' }
+  ]
+}
+→ logicalId: 'FriggVPC' (confidence: high)
+```
+
+### Strategy 2: VPC Containment Analysis (HIGH Confidence)
+
+Checks if VPC contains expected subnets from template.
+
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+// Deployed template has: subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
+// AWS EC2 shows VPC vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7 contains: subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
+// Build template has: { Ref: 'FriggVPC' }
+→ logicalId: 'FriggVPC' (confidence: high)
+```
+
+### Strategy 3: Lambda VPC Usage (MEDIUM Confidence)
+
+Matches by subnet/security group references in Lambda VPC configs.
+
+**Example**:
+```javascript
+// Deployed template:
+MyLambda.Properties.VpcConfig.SubnetIds = ['subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3']
+
+// Build template:
+MyLambda.Properties.VpcConfig.SubnetIds = [{ Ref: 'FriggPrivateSubnet1' }]
+
+→ logicalId: 'FriggPrivateSubnet1' (confidence: medium)
+```
+
+## 📝 CloudFormation Import Format
+
+Generated output for CloudFormation import:
+
+```json
+[
+  {
+    "ResourceType": "AWS::EC2::VPC",
+    "LogicalResourceId": "FriggVPC",
+    "ResourceIdentifier": { "VpcId": "vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7" }
+  },
+  {
+    "ResourceType": "AWS::EC2::Subnet",
+    "LogicalResourceId": "FriggPrivateSubnet1",
+    "ResourceIdentifier": { "SubnetId": "subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3" }
+  },
+  {
+    "ResourceType": "AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup",
+    "LogicalResourceId": "FriggLambdaSecurityGroup",
+    "ResourceIdentifier": { "GroupId": "sg-07c01370e830b6ad6" }
+  }
+]
+```
+
+## ⚠️ Multi-Resource Warnings
+
+When multiple resources of same type are detected:
+
+```
+⚠️  Warnings:
+  • Multiple VPCs detected (3). Review relationships before importing.
+      - FriggVPC ← vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7 (tag, high)
+      - FriggVPC2 ← vpc-020a0365610c05f0b (contained-resources, high)
+      - FriggVPC3 ← vpc-0e2351eac99adcb83 (tag, high)
+```
+
+This helps users identify when manual selection is needed.
+
+## 🚀 CLI Usage Flow
+
+### Before Fix (Wrong Logical IDs)
+```bash
+$ frigg repair --import acme-integrations-dev
+
+📦 Found 3 orphaned resources:
+  1. AWS::EC2::VPC - vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7
+  2. AWS::EC2::Subnet - subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
+  3. AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup - sg-07c01370e830b6ad6
+
+# ❌ Generates:
+# - ImportedResource1
+# - ImportedResource2
+# - ImportedResource3
+```
+
+### After Fix (Correct Logical IDs)
+```bash
+$ serverless package  # Generate build template first
+
+$ frigg repair --import acme-integrations-dev
+
+📦 Found 3 orphaned resources:
+  1. AWS::EC2::VPC - vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7
+  2. AWS::EC2::Subnet - subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3
+  3. AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup - sg-07c01370e830b6ad6
+
+🔍 Analyzing templates to map orphaned resources to correct logical IDs...
+   Build template: .serverless/cloudformation-template-update-stack.json
+   Deployed template: CloudFormation (via AWS API)
+
+✅ Successfully mapped 3 resource(s) to logical IDs:
+  • FriggVPC ← vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7 (tag, high confidence)
+  • FriggPrivateSubnet1 ← subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3 (vpc-usage, high confidence)
+  • FriggLambdaSecurityGroup ← sg-07c01370e830b6ad6 (usage, medium confidence)
+
+📋 The following will be imported into CloudFormation:
+  • FriggVPC (AWS::EC2::VPC)
+  • FriggPrivateSubnet1 (AWS::EC2::Subnet)
+  • FriggLambdaSecurityGroup (AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup)
+
+Proceed with import of 3 resource(s)? (y/N):
+```
+
+## 📦 Commits Made
+
+1. **8b13ab3e** - feat(health): implement template comparison for correct logical ID mapping
+2. **9b24e8e0** - docs(health): comprehensive implementation guide for template comparison fix
+3. **e864c890** - test(health): comprehensive TDD tests for template comparison services
+4. **57de216e** - test(health): TDD tests for importWithLogicalIdMapping use case
+5. **26fd97ad** - feat(cli): integrate template comparison for correct logical ID mapping
+
+## 🧪 Test Coverage
+
+- **Domain Services**: 41 tests (TemplateParser + LogicalIdMapper)
+- **Application Use Cases**: 17 tests (RepairViaImportUseCase)
+- **Total**: 58 tests passing ✅
+- **Test Types**: Unit tests, integration tests, edge cases, error conditions
+- **Mocking**: AWS SDK mocked for EC2 operations
+- **Patterns**: Arrange-Act-Assert, dependency injection
+
+## 📚 Documentation
+
+1. **TEMPLATE-COMPARISON-IMPLEMENTATION.md** (551 lines) - Complete implementation guide
+2. **TDD-IMPLEMENTATION-SUMMARY.md** (This file) - Test results and architecture
+3. **Inline JSDoc** - All methods documented with purpose and examples
+
+## 🎯 Next Steps
+
+1. ✅ Domain layer tests (template-parser, logical-id-mapper)
+2. ✅ Application layer tests (repair-via-import-use-case)
+3. ✅ CLI adapter integration
+4. ⏳ Test with real acme-integrations-dev stack
+5. ⏳ Execute CloudFormation import operation
+6. ⏳ Monitor import status
+7. ⏳ Verify health score improvement
+
+## 💡 Key Insights
+
+### Problem Discovery
+
+The root cause was discovered by analyzing build vs deployed templates:
+
+**Build Template** (`.serverless/cloudformation-template-update-stack.json`):
+```json
+{
+  "Resources": {
+    "FriggVPC": { "Type": "AWS::EC2::VPC" },
+    "MyLambda": {
+      "Properties": {
+        "VpcConfig": {
+          "SubnetIds": [{ "Ref": "FriggPrivateSubnet1" }]
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Deployed Template** (CloudFormation):
+```json
+{
+  "Resources": {
+    "FriggVPC": { "Type": "AWS::EC2::VPC" },
+    "MyLambda": {
+      "Properties": {
+        "VpcConfig": {
+          "SubnetIds": ["subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3"]  // Hardcoded!
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+By comparing these templates, we can map physical IDs back to logical IDs!
+
+### Architecture Benefits
+
+**Hexagonal Architecture**:
+- Domain layer has NO AWS dependencies
+- Application layer orchestrates domain services
+- Infrastructure layer (AWS adapters) separated
+- Presentation layer (CLI) only handles user interaction
+
+**TDD Benefits**:
+- Caught edge cases early
+- Provides regression protection
+- Documents expected behavior
+- Enables confident refactoring
+
+**DDD Benefits**:
+- Clear separation of concerns
+- Ubiquitous language (logical ID, physical ID, mapping, confidence)
+- Domain services contain pure business logic
+- Value objects (StackIdentifier, mappings)
+
+## 🔍 Testing Strategy
+
+### Unit Tests (Domain Layer)
+
+```javascript
+// TemplateParser tests
+test('should extract hardcoded VPC IDs from deployed template', () => {
+  const template = { /* deployed template with hardcoded IDs */ };
+  const result = parser.extractHardcodedIds(template);
+
+  expect(result.vpcIds).toEqual(['vpc-0eadd96976d29ede7']);
+  expect(result.subnetIds).toEqual(['subnet-00ab9e0502e66aac3']);
+});
+```
+
+### Integration Tests (Application Layer)
+
+```javascript
+// RepairViaImportUseCase tests
+test('should successfully map orphaned resources to logical IDs', async () => {
+  const mappingResult = await useCase.importWithLogicalIdMapping({
+    stackIdentifier,
+    orphanedResources,
+    buildTemplatePath
+  });
+
+  expect(mappingResult.success).toBe(true);
+  expect(mappingResult.mappings[0].logicalId).toBe('FriggVPC');
+});
+```
+
+### End-to-End Tests (Presentation Layer)
+
+```bash
+# Manual testing with real AWS stack
+$ frigg repair --import acme-integrations-dev
+
+# Expected: Correct logical IDs mapped via template comparison
+# Actual: (to be tested)
+```
+
+## 🎓 Lessons Learned
+
+1. **Always compare templates** - Build template ≠ Deployed template
+2. **Multiple matching strategies** - Use tags first, fallback to analysis
+3. **Confidence levels matter** - Help users make informed decisions
+4. **TDD catches edge cases** - Multiple VPCs, unmapped resources, etc.
+5. **Hexagonal architecture scales** - Easy to test, easy to extend
+6. **Good documentation saves time** - Clear explanations prevent confusion
+
+---
+
+**Status**: Implementation complete, ready for real-world testing ✅