@forwardimpact/schema 0.1.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (65) hide show
  1. package/bin/fit-schema.js +260 -0
  2. package/examples/behaviours/_index.yaml +8 -0
  3. package/examples/behaviours/outcome_ownership.yaml +43 -0
  4. package/examples/behaviours/polymathic_knowledge.yaml +41 -0
  5. package/examples/behaviours/precise_communication.yaml +39 -0
  6. package/examples/behaviours/relentless_curiosity.yaml +37 -0
  7. package/examples/behaviours/systems_thinking.yaml +40 -0
  8. package/examples/capabilities/_index.yaml +8 -0
  9. package/examples/capabilities/business.yaml +189 -0
  10. package/examples/capabilities/delivery.yaml +305 -0
  11. package/examples/capabilities/people.yaml +68 -0
  12. package/examples/capabilities/reliability.yaml +414 -0
  13. package/examples/capabilities/scale.yaml +378 -0
  14. package/examples/copilot-setup-steps.yaml +25 -0
  15. package/examples/devcontainer.yaml +21 -0
  16. package/examples/disciplines/_index.yaml +6 -0
  17. package/examples/disciplines/data_engineering.yaml +78 -0
  18. package/examples/disciplines/engineering_management.yaml +63 -0
  19. package/examples/disciplines/software_engineering.yaml +78 -0
  20. package/examples/drivers.yaml +202 -0
  21. package/examples/framework.yaml +69 -0
  22. package/examples/grades.yaml +115 -0
  23. package/examples/questions/behaviours/outcome_ownership.yaml +51 -0
  24. package/examples/questions/behaviours/polymathic_knowledge.yaml +47 -0
  25. package/examples/questions/behaviours/precise_communication.yaml +54 -0
  26. package/examples/questions/behaviours/relentless_curiosity.yaml +50 -0
  27. package/examples/questions/behaviours/systems_thinking.yaml +52 -0
  28. package/examples/questions/skills/architecture_design.yaml +53 -0
  29. package/examples/questions/skills/cloud_platforms.yaml +47 -0
  30. package/examples/questions/skills/code_quality.yaml +48 -0
  31. package/examples/questions/skills/data_modeling.yaml +45 -0
  32. package/examples/questions/skills/devops.yaml +46 -0
  33. package/examples/questions/skills/full_stack_development.yaml +47 -0
  34. package/examples/questions/skills/sre_practices.yaml +43 -0
  35. package/examples/questions/skills/stakeholder_management.yaml +48 -0
  36. package/examples/questions/skills/team_collaboration.yaml +42 -0
  37. package/examples/questions/skills/technical_writing.yaml +42 -0
  38. package/examples/self-assessments.yaml +64 -0
  39. package/examples/stages.yaml +139 -0
  40. package/examples/tracks/_index.yaml +5 -0
  41. package/examples/tracks/platform.yaml +49 -0
  42. package/examples/tracks/sre.yaml +48 -0
  43. package/examples/vscode-settings.yaml +21 -0
  44. package/lib/index-generator.js +65 -0
  45. package/lib/index.js +44 -0
  46. package/lib/levels.js +601 -0
  47. package/lib/loader.js +599 -0
  48. package/lib/modifiers.js +23 -0
  49. package/lib/schema-validation.js +438 -0
  50. package/lib/validation.js +2130 -0
  51. package/package.json +49 -0
  52. package/schema/json/behaviour-questions.schema.json +68 -0
  53. package/schema/json/behaviour.schema.json +73 -0
  54. package/schema/json/capability.schema.json +220 -0
  55. package/schema/json/defs.schema.json +132 -0
  56. package/schema/json/discipline.schema.json +132 -0
  57. package/schema/json/drivers.schema.json +48 -0
  58. package/schema/json/framework.schema.json +55 -0
  59. package/schema/json/grades.schema.json +121 -0
  60. package/schema/json/index.schema.json +18 -0
  61. package/schema/json/self-assessments.schema.json +52 -0
  62. package/schema/json/skill-questions.schema.json +68 -0
  63. package/schema/json/stages.schema.json +84 -0
  64. package/schema/json/track.schema.json +100 -0
  65. package/schema/rdf/pathway.ttl +2362 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: cp_aware_1
5
+ text: What cloud platforms are you familiar with?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic cloud awareness
8
+ - Understanding of cloud services
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+
11
+ foundational:
12
+ - id: cp_found_1
13
+ text: How would you deploy a simple application to the cloud?
14
+ lookingFor:
15
+ - Basic deployment knowledge
16
+ - Understanding of cloud resources
17
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
18
+
19
+ working:
20
+ - id: cp_work_1
21
+ text:
22
+ Describe a cloud architecture you've designed. What services did you use
23
+ and why?
24
+ followUps:
25
+ - How did you handle cost optimization?
26
+ lookingFor:
27
+ - Practical cloud architecture experience
28
+ - Service selection rationale
29
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
30
+
31
+ practitioner:
32
+ - id: cp_pract_1
33
+ text:
34
+ How do you approach cloud cost optimization and governance for your team?
35
+ lookingFor:
36
+ - Cloud cost management
37
+ - Governance practices
38
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
39
+
40
+ expert:
41
+ - id: cp_expert_1
42
+ text:
43
+ How have you shaped cloud strategy and practices across an organization?
44
+ lookingFor:
45
+ - Enterprise cloud strategy
46
+ - Multi-cloud or hybrid considerations
47
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: cq_aware_1
5
+ text: What does 'clean code' mean to you?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic understanding of readability
8
+ - Awareness of maintainability concerns
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+
11
+ foundational:
12
+ - id: cq_found_1
13
+ text: How do you ensure the code you write is readable by others?
14
+ followUps:
15
+ - What naming conventions do you follow?
16
+ - How do you decide when to add comments?
17
+ lookingFor:
18
+ - Consistent coding practices
19
+ - Understanding of code formatting and structure
20
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
21
+
22
+ working:
23
+ - id: cq_work_1
24
+ text: How do you approach code review? What do you look for?
25
+ lookingFor:
26
+ - Systematic approach to reviews
27
+ - Balance between quality and velocity
28
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
29
+
30
+ practitioner:
31
+ - id: cq_pract_1
32
+ text: How have you improved code quality practices in your team?
33
+ lookingFor:
34
+ - Measurable improvements
35
+ - Team influence
36
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
37
+
38
+ expert:
39
+ - id: cq_expert_1
40
+ text:
41
+ How have you established code quality standards across an organization?
42
+ followUps:
43
+ - How did you gain adoption?
44
+ - How do you measure success?
45
+ lookingFor:
46
+ - Organizational influence
47
+ - Scalable quality practices
48
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: dm_aware_1
5
+ text: What's the difference between relational and non-relational databases?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic database concepts
8
+ - Understanding of use cases for each
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+ foundational:
11
+ - id: dm_found_1
12
+ text:
13
+ How would you design a simple database schema for a user management
14
+ system?
15
+ lookingFor:
16
+ - Basic schema design
17
+ - Understanding of normalization
18
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
19
+ working:
20
+ - id: dm_work_1
21
+ text: Describe a data model you've designed. What trade-offs did you make?
22
+ followUps:
23
+ - How did you handle performance?
24
+ lookingFor:
25
+ - Practical data modeling experience
26
+ - Performance considerations
27
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
28
+ practitioner:
29
+ - id: dm_pract_1
30
+ text:
31
+ How do you approach data modeling for complex domains with evolving
32
+ requirements?
33
+ lookingFor:
34
+ - Advanced modeling techniques
35
+ - Handling schema evolution
36
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
37
+ expert:
38
+ - id: dm_expert_1
39
+ text:
40
+ How do you establish data modeling standards and practices across an
41
+ organization?
42
+ lookingFor:
43
+ - Enterprise data architecture
44
+ - Organizational standards leadership
45
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: devops_aware_1
5
+ text: What do you understand about CI/CD pipelines? How have you used them?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic understanding of automated builds and deployments
8
+ - Experience using pipelines defined by others
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+ foundational:
11
+ - id: devops_found_1
12
+ text: Describe how you would set up a basic CI pipeline for a new project.
13
+ lookingFor:
14
+ - Understanding of CI fundamentals
15
+ - Basic pipeline configuration knowledge
16
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
17
+ working:
18
+ - id: devops_work_1
19
+ text:
20
+ Tell me about a deployment pipeline you've built. What stages did it
21
+ include?
22
+ followUps:
23
+ - How did you handle failures?
24
+ - What monitoring did you add?
25
+ lookingFor:
26
+ - End-to-end pipeline experience
27
+ - Infrastructure as code awareness
28
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
29
+ practitioner:
30
+ - id: devops_pract_1
31
+ text: How have you improved deployment practices in your team?
32
+ followUps:
33
+ - How did you measure improvement?
34
+ lookingFor:
35
+ - DevOps leadership
36
+ - Metrics-driven improvement
37
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
38
+ expert:
39
+ - id: devops_expert_1
40
+ text: How have you shaped DevOps practices across an organization?
41
+ followUps:
42
+ - What cultural changes did you drive?
43
+ lookingFor:
44
+ - Organizational DevOps transformation
45
+ - Culture change leadership
46
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: fs_aware_1
5
+ text: What layers of a typical web application are you familiar with?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic understanding of frontend, backend, database
8
+ - Awareness of how layers interact
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+ foundational:
11
+ - id: fs_found_1
12
+ text:
13
+ Walk me through building a simple feature that touches the UI, API, and
14
+ database.
15
+ lookingFor:
16
+ - Understanding of full-stack flow
17
+ - Basic implementation across layers
18
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
19
+ working:
20
+ - id: fs_work_1
21
+ text:
22
+ Describe a complete feature you delivered end-to-end. How did you approach
23
+ each layer?
24
+ followUps:
25
+ - What challenges did you face?
26
+ lookingFor:
27
+ - Independent full-stack delivery
28
+ - Pragmatic technology choices
29
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
30
+ practitioner:
31
+ - id: fs_pract_1
32
+ text:
33
+ How do you rapidly deliver complete solutions without depending on
34
+ specialists?
35
+ followUps:
36
+ - How do you handle areas outside your expertise?
37
+ lookingFor:
38
+ - Speed of end-to-end delivery
39
+ - Self-sufficiency across the stack
40
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
41
+ expert:
42
+ - id: fs_expert_1
43
+ text: How do you enable rapid full-stack delivery across teams?
44
+ lookingFor:
45
+ - Organizational full-stack enablement
46
+ - Removing specialist dependencies at scale
47
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: sre_aware_1
5
+ text: What do you understand by SLIs, SLOs, and error budgets?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic SRE concepts understanding
8
+ - Awareness of reliability metrics
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+ foundational:
11
+ - id: sre_found_1
12
+ text: How would you set up basic monitoring and alerting for a service?
13
+ lookingFor:
14
+ - Understanding of observability basics
15
+ - Experience with monitoring tools
16
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
17
+ working:
18
+ - id: sre_work_1
19
+ text:
20
+ Describe how you've handled an incident in production. What was your
21
+ process?
22
+ followUps:
23
+ - What did you learn from it?
24
+ lookingFor:
25
+ - Incident response experience
26
+ - Post-incident improvement
27
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
28
+ practitioner:
29
+ - id: sre_pract_1
30
+ text: How do you balance reliability with feature velocity in your team?
31
+ lookingFor:
32
+ - Error budget management
33
+ - Pragmatic reliability decisions
34
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
35
+ expert:
36
+ - id: sre_expert_1
37
+ text:
38
+ How have you established reliability culture and practices across an
39
+ organization?
40
+ lookingFor:
41
+ - Organizational reliability leadership
42
+ - Systematic reliability improvement
43
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: stk_aware_1
5
+ text:
6
+ Who are the key stakeholders you work with and how do you keep them
7
+ informed?
8
+ lookingFor:
9
+ - Stakeholder identification
10
+ - Basic communication practices
11
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
12
+ foundational:
13
+ - id: stk_found_1
14
+ text:
15
+ How do you set expectations with stakeholders about timelines and
16
+ deliverables?
17
+ lookingFor:
18
+ - Expectation management
19
+ - Proactive communication
20
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
21
+ working:
22
+ - id: stk_work_1
23
+ text:
24
+ Describe a situation where you had to manage conflicting stakeholder
25
+ priorities.
26
+ followUps:
27
+ - How did you resolve it?
28
+ lookingFor:
29
+ - Conflict navigation
30
+ - Prioritization skills
31
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
32
+ practitioner:
33
+ - id: stk_pract_1
34
+ text:
35
+ How do you build trust with senior stakeholders and influence their
36
+ decisions?
37
+ lookingFor:
38
+ - Executive relationship building
39
+ - Influence without authority
40
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
41
+ expert:
42
+ - id: stk_expert_1
43
+ text:
44
+ How do you manage complex stakeholder landscapes across an organization?
45
+ lookingFor:
46
+ - Enterprise stakeholder management
47
+ - Political navigation
48
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: tc_aware_1
5
+ text: How do you work with your team to complete shared tasks?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic teamwork skills
8
+ - Communication practices
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+ foundational:
11
+ - id: tc_found_1
12
+ text:
13
+ Describe how you've helped a teammate when they were stuck on a problem.
14
+ lookingFor:
15
+ - Supportive collaboration
16
+ - Knowledge sharing
17
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
18
+ working:
19
+ - id: tc_work_1
20
+ text: How do you facilitate effective collaboration within your team?
21
+ followUps:
22
+ - How do you handle remote collaboration?
23
+ lookingFor:
24
+ - Active collaboration facilitation
25
+ - Team enablement
26
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
27
+ practitioner:
28
+ - id: tc_pract_1
29
+ text: Describe how you've built high-performing team dynamics.
30
+ lookingFor:
31
+ - Team building expertise
32
+ - Handling interpersonal challenges
33
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
34
+ expert:
35
+ - id: tc_expert_1
36
+ text:
37
+ How do you create collaborative culture across multiple teams or an
38
+ organization?
39
+ lookingFor:
40
+ - Cross-team collaboration leadership
41
+ - Organizational culture shaping
42
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/skill-questions.schema.json
2
+
3
+ awareness:
4
+ - id: tw_aware_1
5
+ text: How do you approach documenting your code and work?
6
+ lookingFor:
7
+ - Basic documentation habits
8
+ - Understanding of documentation importance
9
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
10
+ foundational:
11
+ - id: tw_found_1
12
+ text: What makes a good README file? Walk me through what you'd include.
13
+ lookingFor:
14
+ - README best practices
15
+ - Reader-centric documentation
16
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 5
17
+ working:
18
+ - id: tw_work_1
19
+ text:
20
+ How do you write technical specifications that enable others to implement
21
+ features?
22
+ followUps:
23
+ - How detailed do you go?
24
+ lookingFor:
25
+ - Spec writing skills
26
+ - Communication of technical requirements
27
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
28
+ practitioner:
29
+ - id: tw_pract_1
30
+ text:
31
+ How do you establish documentation standards and practices in your team?
32
+ lookingFor:
33
+ - Documentation leadership
34
+ - Spec-driven development advocacy
35
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 8
36
+ expert:
37
+ - id: tw_expert_1
38
+ text: How do you create organizational documentation culture and systems?
39
+ lookingFor:
40
+ - Enterprise documentation strategy
41
+ - Knowledge management systems
42
+ expectedDurationMinutes: 10
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/self-assessments.schema.json
2
+
3
+ - id: example_mid_swe
4
+ skillLevels:
5
+ architecture_design: working
6
+ code_quality: working
7
+ devops: foundational
8
+ ai_augmented_development: foundational
9
+ technical_debt_management: foundational
10
+ lean_thinking: awareness
11
+ data_modeling: awareness
12
+ stakeholder_management: awareness
13
+ technical_writing: foundational
14
+ ai_literacy: foundational
15
+ service_management: awareness
16
+ behaviourMaturities:
17
+ precise_communication: developing
18
+ relentless_curiosity: developing
19
+ outcome_ownership: developing
20
+ polymathic_knowledge: emerging
21
+ systems_thinking: developing
22
+
23
+ # Example: Senior Data Engineer
24
+ - id: example_senior_de
25
+ skillLevels:
26
+ data_modeling: practitioner
27
+ data_integration: practitioner
28
+ architecture_design: working
29
+ code_quality: working
30
+ devops: working
31
+ cloud_platforms: working
32
+ ai_literacy: working
33
+ stakeholder_management: foundational
34
+ technical_writing: foundational
35
+ ai_augmented_development: foundational
36
+ lean_thinking: foundational
37
+ behaviourMaturities:
38
+ precise_communication: practicing
39
+ relentless_curiosity: practicing
40
+ outcome_ownership: practicing
41
+ polymathic_knowledge: developing
42
+ systems_thinking: practicing
43
+
44
+ # Example: Data Scientist - R&D Focus
45
+ - id: example_ds_rd
46
+ skillLevels:
47
+ model_development: working
48
+ data_analysis: working
49
+ statistical_modeling: working
50
+ data_modeling: foundational
51
+ ai_evaluation: working
52
+ technical_writing: foundational
53
+ business_immersion: foundational
54
+ code_quality: foundational
55
+ stakeholder_management: awareness
56
+ ai_literacy: working
57
+ multi_audience_communication: foundational
58
+ service_management: awareness
59
+ behaviourMaturities:
60
+ precise_communication: developing
61
+ relentless_curiosity: practicing
62
+ outcome_ownership: developing
63
+ polymathic_knowledge: developing
64
+ systems_thinking: developing
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/stages.schema.json
2
+
3
+ - id: specify
4
+ name: Specify
5
+ emojiIcon: "🎯"
6
+ description:
7
+ Your primary task is to define WHAT users need and WHY, not how to build it.
8
+ Gather requirements, write user stories, and define acceptance criteria.
9
+ handoffs:
10
+ - targetStage: specify
11
+ label: Refine Spec
12
+ prompt: Refine spec.md with more detail or clarity.
13
+ - targetStage: specify
14
+ label: Alternative Spec
15
+ prompt: Create an alternative spec.md exploring a different approach.
16
+ - targetStage: plan
17
+ label: Create Plan
18
+ prompt: Create plan.md based on spec.md.
19
+ constraints:
20
+ - Do not make code edits or execute commands
21
+ - Focus on WHAT users need and WHY, not HOW to implement
22
+ - Write specifications as markdown files under specs/[feature-name]/spec.md
23
+ - Mark ambiguities with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]; ask the user; do not guess
24
+ - No technology choices, APIs, or code structure in specifications
25
+ entryCriteria: []
26
+ exitCriteria:
27
+ - spec.md exists with user stories and acceptance criteria
28
+ - No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers in spec.md
29
+
30
+ - id: plan
31
+ name: Plan
32
+ emojiIcon: "📐"
33
+ description:
34
+ Your primary task is to define HOW to build the solution. Make technology
35
+ choices, design architecture, define contracts and data models.
36
+ handoffs:
37
+ - targetStage: plan
38
+ label: Refine Plan
39
+ prompt: Refine plan.md with more detail or clarity.
40
+ - targetStage: plan
41
+ label: Alternative Plan
42
+ prompt: Create an alternative plan.md exploring a different approach.
43
+ - targetStage: code
44
+ label: Start Coding
45
+ prompt: Implement the tasks defined in plan.md.
46
+ constraints:
47
+ - Do not make code edits or execute commands
48
+ - Every technology choice must trace back to a specific requirement
49
+ - Write plans as markdown files under specs/[feature-name]/plan.md
50
+ - Define contracts and data models before implementation details
51
+ - Document rationale for architectural decisions
52
+ entryCriteria:
53
+ - spec.md exists with user stories and acceptance criteria
54
+ - No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers in spec.md
55
+ exitCriteria:
56
+ - plan.md exists with technology choices and architecture
57
+ - Contracts and data models defined where applicable
58
+ - No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers in plan.md
59
+
60
+ - id: code
61
+ name: Code
62
+ emojiIcon: "💻"
63
+ description:
64
+ Your primary task is to implement the solution. Write code, write tests, and
65
+ iterate until the implementation is complete.
66
+ handoffs:
67
+ - targetStage: review
68
+ label: Request Review
69
+ prompt: Review the implemented changes.
70
+ constraints:
71
+ - Implement one task at a time, verify before moving on
72
+ - Write tests alongside implementation
73
+ - Track progress with the todo tool
74
+ entryCriteria:
75
+ - spec.md exists with user stories and acceptance criteria
76
+ - plan.md exists with technology choices and architecture
77
+ - No unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers in plan.md
78
+ exitCriteria:
79
+ - Implementation complete according to plan.md
80
+ - Tests written and passing
81
+ - Self-review completed
82
+
83
+ - id: review
84
+ name: Review
85
+ emojiIcon: "🔍"
86
+ description:
87
+ Your primary task is to verify the implementation works correctly. Run the
88
+ application, test against acceptance criteria, document findings.
89
+ handoffs:
90
+ - targetStage: code
91
+ label: Request Changes
92
+ prompt: Address the findings in review.md.
93
+ - targetStage: plan
94
+ label: Needs Re-planning
95
+ prompt: Update plan.md to address issues found in review.md.
96
+ - targetStage: deploy
97
+ label: Deploy
98
+ prompt: Deploy the approved changes.
99
+ constraints:
100
+ - Do not make code edits
101
+ - Write review findings as markdown under specs/[feature-name]/review.md
102
+ - Prioritize actionable feedback over exhaustive lists
103
+ - Track findings and required changes with the todo tool
104
+ - Run the application locally and verify changes work as expected
105
+ - Test user-facing functionality against acceptance criteria
106
+ entryCriteria:
107
+ - Implementation complete according to plan.md
108
+ - Tests written and passing
109
+ - Self-review completed
110
+ exitCriteria:
111
+ - Application runs locally without errors
112
+ - Changes verified against acceptance criteria through manual testing
113
+ - No blocking issues identified in review
114
+ - Review approved
115
+
116
+ - id: deploy
117
+ name: Deploy
118
+ emojiIcon: "🚀"
119
+ description:
120
+ Your primary task is to ship the changes to production. Push code, monitor
121
+ CI/CD workflows, and verify successful deployment.
122
+ handoffs:
123
+ - targetStage: code
124
+ label: Fix Pipeline
125
+ prompt: Fix the failing workflow issues identified during deployment.
126
+ constraints:
127
+ - Use git push to deploy changes
128
+ - Use gh CLI to monitor triggered workflows (gh run list, gh run watch)
129
+ - Do not make code edits; hand off to code stage if fixes are needed
130
+ - Verify all workflows complete successfully before considering deployment
131
+ done
132
+ entryCriteria:
133
+ - Application runs locally without errors
134
+ - Changes verified against acceptance criteria through manual testing
135
+ - No blocking issues identified in review
136
+ - Review approved
137
+ exitCriteria:
138
+ - All triggered workflows are green
139
+ - Deployment verified in target environment
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
1
+ # Auto-generated index for browser loading
2
+ # Do not edit manually - regenerate with: npx pathway --generate-index
3
+ files:
4
+ - platform
5
+ - sre
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
1
+ # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://schema.forwardimpact.team/json/track.schema.json
2
+
3
+ name: Platform
4
+
5
+ # Shared content (used by both human job descriptions and agent profiles)
6
+ description:
7
+ Internal tooling and infrastructure focus, building shared capabilities that
8
+ enable other engineering teams. Treats the platform as a product with
9
+ developers as customers.
10
+ roleContext:
11
+ In this platform-focused role, you will build internal tooling and shared
12
+ infrastructure that enables other engineering teams to be more productive. You
13
+ will treat the platform as a product—conducting user research, building golden
14
+ paths, and optimizing for developer experience.
15
+
16
+ # Derivation inputs - used by both human and agent profiles
17
+ skillModifiers:
18
+ delivery: 1
19
+ business: 1
20
+ reliability: -1
21
+ behaviourModifiers:
22
+ systems_thinking: 1
23
+ precise_communication: 1
24
+ assessmentWeights:
25
+ skillWeight: 0.6
26
+ behaviourWeight: 0.4
27
+
28
+ # Agent-specific content
29
+ agent:
30
+ identity: |
31
+ You are a Platform {roleTitle} agent. Your primary focus is
32
+ building self-service capabilities that enable other engineers.
33
+ priority: |
34
+ Developer experience is paramount. You design golden paths, maintain
35
+ backward compatibility, and document everything. Code quality and
36
+ architecture matter because your consumers depend on your stability.
37
+
38
+ Every API change must consider developer experience. Treat breaking
39
+ changes with extreme caution—your consumers build on your stability.
40
+ beforeMakingChanges:
41
+ - Understand the existing architecture and patterns
42
+ - Identify test coverage requirements
43
+ - Consider backward compatibility implications
44
+ - Plan documentation updates
45
+ constraints:
46
+ - Maintain backward compatibility
47
+ - Document breaking changes with migration guides
48
+ - Test all changes against real consumer use cases
49
+ - Design for Day 50, not just Day 1