@forwardimpact/pathway 0.2.0 → 0.4.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (62) hide show
  1. package/app/commands/agent.js +20 -20
  2. package/app/commands/index.js +4 -3
  3. package/app/commands/job.js +9 -4
  4. package/app/commands/skill.js +56 -2
  5. package/app/commands/tool.js +112 -0
  6. package/app/components/builder.js +6 -3
  7. package/app/components/checklist.js +6 -4
  8. package/app/components/markdown-textarea.js +132 -0
  9. package/app/css/components/forms.css +45 -0
  10. package/app/css/components/layout.css +12 -0
  11. package/app/css/components/surfaces.css +22 -0
  12. package/app/css/pages/detail.css +50 -0
  13. package/app/css/pages/job-builder.css +0 -42
  14. package/app/formatters/agent/profile.js +61 -120
  15. package/app/formatters/agent/skill.js +48 -60
  16. package/app/formatters/grade/dom.js +2 -4
  17. package/app/formatters/job/description.js +74 -82
  18. package/app/formatters/job/dom.js +45 -179
  19. package/app/formatters/job/markdown.js +17 -13
  20. package/app/formatters/shared.js +65 -2
  21. package/app/formatters/skill/dom.js +57 -2
  22. package/app/formatters/skill/markdown.js +18 -0
  23. package/app/formatters/skill/shared.js +12 -4
  24. package/app/formatters/stage/microdata.js +1 -1
  25. package/app/formatters/stage/shared.js +1 -1
  26. package/app/formatters/tool/shared.js +72 -0
  27. package/app/handout-main.js +7 -7
  28. package/app/handout.html +7 -0
  29. package/app/index.html +10 -3
  30. package/app/lib/card-mappers.js +64 -17
  31. package/app/lib/form-controls.js +64 -1
  32. package/app/lib/render.js +12 -1
  33. package/app/lib/template-loader.js +9 -0
  34. package/app/lib/yaml-loader.js +12 -1
  35. package/app/main.js +4 -0
  36. package/app/model/agent.js +26 -18
  37. package/app/model/derivation.js +3 -3
  38. package/app/model/levels.js +2 -0
  39. package/app/model/loader.js +12 -1
  40. package/app/model/validation.js +74 -8
  41. package/app/pages/agent-builder.js +8 -5
  42. package/app/pages/job.js +28 -4
  43. package/app/pages/landing.js +34 -14
  44. package/app/pages/progress.js +6 -5
  45. package/app/pages/self-assessment.js +10 -8
  46. package/app/pages/skill.js +5 -17
  47. package/app/pages/stage.js +10 -6
  48. package/app/pages/tool.js +50 -0
  49. package/app/slides/index.js +25 -25
  50. package/app/slides.html +7 -0
  51. package/bin/pathway.js +41 -27
  52. package/examples/capabilities/business.yaml +17 -17
  53. package/examples/capabilities/delivery.yaml +51 -36
  54. package/examples/capabilities/reliability.yaml +127 -114
  55. package/examples/capabilities/scale.yaml +38 -36
  56. package/examples/disciplines/engineering_management.yaml +1 -1
  57. package/examples/framework.yaml +12 -0
  58. package/examples/grades.yaml +18 -19
  59. package/examples/self-assessments.yaml +1 -1
  60. package/package.json +1 -1
  61. package/templates/job.template.md +47 -0
  62. package/templates/skill.template.md +31 -12
@@ -102,10 +102,10 @@ skills:
102
102
  initiatives.
103
103
  agent:
104
104
  name: technical-writing
105
- description: |
106
- Guide for creating clear technical documentation. Use when writing
107
- READMEs, API docs, specifications, or any technical content that needs
108
- to be clear and accurate.
105
+ description: Guide for creating clear technical documentation.
106
+ useWhen: |
107
+ Writing READMEs, API docs, specifications, or any technical content
108
+ that needs to be clear and accurate.
109
109
  stages:
110
110
  specify:
111
111
  focus: |
@@ -172,18 +172,18 @@ skills:
172
172
  - Audience can discover and find it
173
173
  - Search and navigation are updated
174
174
  - Maintenance schedule is established
175
- reference: |
176
- ## Document Types
175
+ implementationReference: |
176
+ ## Document Types
177
177
 
178
- | Type | Purpose | Key Sections |
179
- |------|---------|--------------|
180
- | README | Project overview | Description, Getting Started, Usage |
181
- | API Docs | API reference | Endpoints, Parameters, Examples |
182
- | Spec | Design proposal | Problem, Solution, Alternatives |
183
- | Tutorial | Learning guide | Objective, Steps, Outcomes |
178
+ | Type | Purpose | Key Sections |
179
+ |------|---------|--------------|
180
+ | README | Project overview | Description, Getting Started, Usage |
181
+ | API Docs | API reference | Endpoints, Parameters, Examples |
182
+ | Spec | Design proposal | Problem, Solution, Alternatives |
183
+ | Tutorial | Learning guide | Objective, Steps, Outcomes |
184
184
 
185
- ## Writing Principles
186
- - Use simple, direct language
187
- - One idea per sentence
188
- - Active voice over passive
189
- - Lead with most important info
185
+ ## Writing Principles
186
+ - Use simple, direct language
187
+ - One idea per sentence
188
+ - Active voice over passive
189
+ - Lead with most important info
@@ -73,10 +73,11 @@ skills:
73
73
  architecture authority.
74
74
  agent:
75
75
  name: architecture-design
76
- description: |
76
+ description:
77
77
  Guide for designing software systems and making architectural decisions.
78
- Use when asked to design a system, evaluate architecture options, or
79
- make structural decisions about code organization.
78
+ useWhen: |
79
+ Asked to design a system, evaluate architecture options, or make
80
+ structural decisions about code organization.
80
81
  stages:
81
82
  specify:
82
83
  focus: |
@@ -144,23 +145,23 @@ skills:
144
145
  - Performance meets requirements
145
146
  - Monitoring confirms design assumptions
146
147
  - Operational procedures are documented
147
- reference: |
148
- ## Common Patterns
148
+ implementationReference: |
149
+ ## Common Patterns
149
150
 
150
- ### Service Architecture
151
- - **Microservices**: Independent deployment, clear boundaries
152
- - **Monolith**: Simpler deployment, easier refactoring
153
- - **Modular monolith**: Boundaries within single deployment
151
+ ### Service Architecture
152
+ - **Microservices**: Independent deployment, clear boundaries
153
+ - **Monolith**: Simpler deployment, easier refactoring
154
+ - **Modular monolith**: Boundaries within single deployment
154
155
 
155
- ### Data Patterns
156
- - **Event sourcing**: Full audit trail, complex queries
157
- - **CQRS**: Separate read and write models
158
- - **Repository pattern**: Abstract data access
156
+ ### Data Patterns
157
+ - **Event sourcing**: Full audit trail, complex queries
158
+ - **CQRS**: Separate read and write models
159
+ - **Repository pattern**: Abstract data access
159
160
 
160
- ### Communication Patterns
161
- - **REST**: Synchronous, request-response
162
- - **Event-driven**: Asynchronous, loose coupling
163
- - **gRPC**: Efficient, strongly typed
161
+ ### Communication Patterns
162
+ - **REST**: Synchronous, request-response
163
+ - **Event-driven**: Asynchronous, loose coupling
164
+ - **gRPC**: Efficient, strongly typed
164
165
  - id: full_stack_development
165
166
  name: Full-Stack Development
166
167
  human:
@@ -195,10 +196,11 @@ skills:
195
196
  polymathic engineering.
196
197
  agent:
197
198
  name: full-stack-development
198
- description: |
199
+ description:
199
200
  Guide for building complete solutions across the full technology stack.
200
- Use when implementing features spanning frontend, backend, database,
201
- and infrastructure layers.
201
+ useWhen: |
202
+ Implementing features spanning frontend, backend, database, and
203
+ infrastructure layers.
202
204
  stages:
203
205
  specify:
204
206
  focus: |
@@ -266,23 +268,36 @@ skills:
266
268
  - Feature works end-to-end in production
267
269
  - No errors in monitoring
268
270
  - Performance meets requirements
269
- reference: |
270
- ## Technology Stack
271
+ toolReferences:
272
+ - name: Terraform
273
+ url: https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs
274
+ description: Infrastructure as code tool
275
+ useWhen: Provisioning and managing cloud infrastructure
276
+ - name: CloudFormation
277
+ url: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cloudformation/
278
+ description: AWS infrastructure as code service
279
+ useWhen: Managing AWS infrastructure as code
280
+ - name: Docker
281
+ url: https://docs.docker.com/
282
+ description: Container platform
283
+ useWhen: Containerizing applications or managing container environments
284
+ implementationReference: |
285
+ ## Technology Stack
271
286
 
272
- ### Primary Languages
273
- - **JavaScript/TypeScript**: Frontend and Node.js backend
274
- - **Python**: Backend APIs and data processing
287
+ ### Primary Languages
288
+ - **JavaScript/TypeScript**: Frontend and Node.js backend
289
+ - **Python**: Backend APIs and data processing
275
290
 
276
- ### Infrastructure
277
- - **Terraform**: Cloud infrastructure as code
278
- - **CloudFormation**: AWS-specific infrastructure
279
- - **Docker**: Containerization
291
+ ### Infrastructure
292
+ - **Terraform**: Cloud infrastructure as code
293
+ - **CloudFormation**: AWS-specific infrastructure
294
+ - **Docker**: Containerization
280
295
 
281
- ## Layer Responsibilities
296
+ ## Layer Responsibilities
282
297
 
283
- | Layer | Responsibilities |
284
- |-------|-----------------|
285
- | Frontend | UI/UX, client validation, API integration |
286
- | Backend | Business logic, auth, external services |
287
- | Database | Persistence, queries, migrations |
288
- | Infrastructure | Deployment, scaling, monitoring |
298
+ | Layer | Responsibilities |
299
+ |-------|-----------------|
300
+ | Frontend | UI/UX, client validation, API integration |
301
+ | Backend | Business logic, auth, external services |
302
+ | Database | Persistence, queries, migrations |
303
+ | Infrastructure | Deployment, scaling, monitoring |
@@ -72,9 +72,11 @@ skills:
72
72
  agent:
73
73
  name: devops-cicd
74
74
  description: |
75
- Guide for building CI/CD pipelines, managing infrastructure as code, and
76
- implementing deployment best practices. Use when setting up pipelines,
77
- containerizing applications, or configuring infrastructure.
75
+ Guide for building CI/CD pipelines, managing infrastructure as code,
76
+ and implementing deployment best practices.
77
+ useWhen: |
78
+ Setting up pipelines, containerizing applications, or configuring
79
+ infrastructure.
78
80
  stages:
79
81
  specify:
80
82
  focus: |
@@ -153,64 +155,73 @@ skills:
153
155
  - Workflows tested in production
154
156
  - Monitoring confirms healthy operation
155
157
  - First deployment through pipeline succeeded
156
- reference: |
157
- ## CI/CD Pipeline Stages
158
+ toolReferences:
159
+ - name: Terraform
160
+ url: https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs
161
+ description: Infrastructure as code tool
162
+ useWhen: Provisioning and managing cloud infrastructure
163
+ - name: Docker
164
+ url: https://docs.docker.com/
165
+ description: Container platform
166
+ useWhen: Containerizing applications or managing container environments
167
+ implementationReference: |
168
+ ## CI/CD Pipeline Stages
158
169
 
159
- ### Build
160
- - Install dependencies
161
- - Compile/transpile code
162
- - Generate artifacts
163
- - Cache dependencies for speed
170
+ ### Build
171
+ - Install dependencies
172
+ - Compile/transpile code
173
+ - Generate artifacts
174
+ - Cache dependencies for speed
164
175
 
165
- ### Test
166
- - Run unit tests
167
- - Run integration tests
168
- - Static analysis and linting
169
- - Security scanning
176
+ ### Test
177
+ - Run unit tests
178
+ - Run integration tests
179
+ - Static analysis and linting
180
+ - Security scanning
170
181
 
171
- ### Deploy
172
- - Deploy to staging environment
173
- - Run smoke tests
174
- - Deploy to production
175
- - Verify deployment health
182
+ ### Deploy
183
+ - Deploy to staging environment
184
+ - Run smoke tests
185
+ - Deploy to production
186
+ - Verify deployment health
176
187
 
177
- ## Infrastructure as Code
188
+ ## Infrastructure as Code
178
189
 
179
- ### Terraform
180
- ```hcl
181
- # Define resources declaratively
182
- resource "aws_instance" "example" {
183
- ami = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
184
- instance_type = "t2.micro"
185
- }
186
- ```
190
+ ### Terraform
191
+ ```hcl
192
+ # Define resources declaratively
193
+ resource "aws_instance" "example" {
194
+ ami = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
195
+ instance_type = "t2.micro"
196
+ }
197
+ ```
187
198
 
188
- ### Docker
189
- ```dockerfile
190
- FROM node:18-alpine
191
- WORKDIR /app
192
- COPY package*.json ./
193
- RUN npm ci --only=production
194
- COPY . .
195
- CMD ["node", "server.js"]
196
- ```
199
+ ### Docker
200
+ ```dockerfile
201
+ FROM node:18-alpine
202
+ WORKDIR /app
203
+ COPY package*.json ./
204
+ RUN npm ci --only=production
205
+ COPY . .
206
+ CMD ["node", "server.js"]
207
+ ```
197
208
 
198
- ## Deployment Strategies
209
+ ## Deployment Strategies
199
210
 
200
- ### Rolling Deployment
201
- - Gradual replacement of instances
202
- - Zero downtime
203
- - Easy rollback
211
+ ### Rolling Deployment
212
+ - Gradual replacement of instances
213
+ - Zero downtime
214
+ - Easy rollback
204
215
 
205
- ### Blue-Green Deployment
206
- - Two identical environments
207
- - Switch traffic atomically
208
- - Fast rollback
216
+ ### Blue-Green Deployment
217
+ - Two identical environments
218
+ - Switch traffic atomically
219
+ - Fast rollback
209
220
 
210
- ### Canary Deployment
211
- - Route small percentage to new version
212
- - Monitor for issues
213
- - Gradually increase traffic
221
+ ### Canary Deployment
222
+ - Route small percentage to new version
223
+ - Monitor for issues
224
+ - Gradually increase traffic
214
225
  - id: sre_practices
215
226
  name: Site Reliability Engineering
216
227
  human:
@@ -241,8 +252,10 @@ skills:
241
252
  name: sre-practices
242
253
  description: |
243
254
  Guide for ensuring system reliability through observability, incident
244
- response, and capacity planning. Use when designing monitoring, handling
245
- incidents, setting SLOs, or improving system resilience.
255
+ response, and capacity planning.
256
+ useWhen: |
257
+ Designing monitoring, handling incidents, setting SLOs, or improving
258
+ system resilience.
246
259
  stages:
247
260
  specify:
248
261
  focus: |
@@ -322,78 +335,78 @@ skills:
322
335
  - Alerts fire correctly for SLO breaches
323
336
  - On-call team is trained and ready
324
337
  - Production readiness review is complete
325
- reference: |
326
- ## Service Level Concepts
338
+ implementationReference: |
339
+ ## Service Level Concepts
327
340
 
328
- ### SLI (Service Level Indicator)
329
- Quantitative measure of service behavior:
330
- - Request latency (p50, p95, p99)
331
- - Error rate (% of failed requests)
332
- - Availability (% of successful requests)
333
- - Throughput (requests per second)
341
+ ### SLI (Service Level Indicator)
342
+ Quantitative measure of service behavior:
343
+ - Request latency (p50, p95, p99)
344
+ - Error rate (% of failed requests)
345
+ - Availability (% of successful requests)
346
+ - Throughput (requests per second)
334
347
 
335
- ### SLO (Service Level Objective)
336
- Target value for an SLI:
337
- - "99.9% of requests complete in < 200ms"
338
- - "Error rate < 0.1% over 30 days"
339
- - "99.95% availability monthly"
348
+ ### SLO (Service Level Objective)
349
+ Target value for an SLI:
350
+ - "99.9% of requests complete in < 200ms"
351
+ - "Error rate < 0.1% over 30 days"
352
+ - "99.95% availability monthly"
340
353
 
341
- ### Error Budget
342
- Allowed unreliability: 100% - SLO
343
- - 99.9% SLO = 0.1% error budget
344
- - ~43 minutes downtime per month
345
- - Spend on features or reliability
354
+ ### Error Budget
355
+ Allowed unreliability: 100% - SLO
356
+ - 99.9% SLO = 0.1% error budget
357
+ - ~43 minutes downtime per month
358
+ - Spend on features or reliability
346
359
 
347
- ## Observability
360
+ ## Observability
348
361
 
349
- ### Three Pillars
350
- - **Metrics**: Aggregated numeric data (counters, gauges, histograms)
351
- - **Logs**: Discrete event records with context
352
- - **Traces**: Request flow across services
362
+ ### Three Pillars
363
+ - **Metrics**: Aggregated numeric data (counters, gauges, histograms)
364
+ - **Logs**: Discrete event records with context
365
+ - **Traces**: Request flow across services
353
366
 
354
- ### Alerting Principles
355
- - Alert on symptoms, not causes
356
- - Every alert should be actionable
357
- - Reduce noise ruthlessly
358
- - Page only for user-impacting issues
359
- - Use severity levels appropriately
367
+ ### Alerting Principles
368
+ - Alert on symptoms, not causes
369
+ - Every alert should be actionable
370
+ - Reduce noise ruthlessly
371
+ - Page only for user-impacting issues
372
+ - Use severity levels appropriately
360
373
 
361
- ## Incident Response
374
+ ## Incident Response
362
375
 
363
- ### Incident Lifecycle
364
- 1. **Detection**: Automated alerts or user reports
365
- 2. **Triage**: Assess severity and impact
366
- 3. **Mitigation**: Stop the bleeding first
367
- 4. **Resolution**: Fix the underlying issue
368
- 5. **Post-mortem**: Learn and improve
376
+ ### Incident Lifecycle
377
+ 1. **Detection**: Automated alerts or user reports
378
+ 2. **Triage**: Assess severity and impact
379
+ 3. **Mitigation**: Stop the bleeding first
380
+ 4. **Resolution**: Fix the underlying issue
381
+ 5. **Post-mortem**: Learn and improve
369
382
 
370
- ### During an Incident
371
- - Communicate early and often
372
- - Focus on mitigation before root cause
373
- - Document actions in real-time
374
- - Escalate when needed
375
- - Update stakeholders regularly
383
+ ### During an Incident
384
+ - Communicate early and often
385
+ - Focus on mitigation before root cause
386
+ - Document actions in real-time
387
+ - Escalate when needed
388
+ - Update stakeholders regularly
376
389
 
377
- ## Post-Mortem Process
390
+ ## Post-Mortem Process
378
391
 
379
- ### Blameless Culture
380
- - Focus on systems, not individuals
381
- - Assume good intentions
382
- - Ask "how did the system allow this?"
383
- - Share findings openly
392
+ ### Blameless Culture
393
+ - Focus on systems, not individuals
394
+ - Assume good intentions
395
+ - Ask "how did the system allow this?"
396
+ - Share findings openly
384
397
 
385
- ### Post-Mortem Template
386
- 1. Incident summary
387
- 2. Timeline of events
388
- 3. Root cause analysis
389
- 4. What went well
390
- 5. What could be improved
391
- 6. Action items with owners
398
+ ### Post-Mortem Template
399
+ 1. Incident summary
400
+ 2. Timeline of events
401
+ 3. Root cause analysis
402
+ 4. What went well
403
+ 5. What could be improved
404
+ 6. Action items with owners
392
405
 
393
- ## Resilience Patterns
406
+ ## Resilience Patterns
394
407
 
395
- - **Timeouts**: Don't wait forever
396
- - **Retries**: With exponential backoff
397
- - **Circuit breakers**: Fail fast when downstream is unhealthy
398
- - **Bulkheads**: Isolate failures
399
- - **Graceful degradation**: Partial functionality over total failure
408
+ - **Timeouts**: Don't wait forever
409
+ - **Retries**: With exponential backoff
410
+ - **Circuit breakers**: Fail fast when downstream is unhealthy
411
+ - **Bulkheads**: Isolate failures
412
+ - **Graceful degradation**: Partial functionality over total failure
@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ skills:
71
71
  recognized as an authority on cloud architecture.
72
72
  agent:
73
73
  name: cloud-platforms
74
- description: |
75
- Guide for working with cloud infrastructure and services. Use when
76
- deploying to cloud, selecting cloud services, configuring infrastructure,
77
- or solving cloud-specific challenges.
74
+ description: Guide for working with cloud infrastructure and services.
75
+ useWhen: |
76
+ Deploying to cloud, selecting cloud services, configuring
77
+ infrastructure, or solving cloud-specific challenges.
78
78
  stages:
79
79
  specify:
80
80
  focus: |
@@ -141,21 +141,21 @@ skills:
141
141
  - Failover tested in production
142
142
  - Monitoring is operational
143
143
  - Cost tracking is active
144
- reference: |
145
- ## Service Categories
144
+ implementationReference: |
145
+ ## Service Categories
146
146
 
147
- | Category | Services | Use Case |
148
- |----------|----------|----------|
149
- | Compute | EC2, ECS, Lambda | VMs, Containers, Serverless |
150
- | Storage | S3, EBS, EFS | Objects, Blocks, Files |
151
- | Database | RDS, DynamoDB | SQL, NoSQL |
152
- | Messaging | SQS, SNS, Kinesis | Queues, Pub/Sub, Streaming |
147
+ | Category | Services | Use Case |
148
+ |----------|----------|----------|
149
+ | Compute | EC2, ECS, Lambda | VMs, Containers, Serverless |
150
+ | Storage | S3, EBS, EFS | Objects, Blocks, Files |
151
+ | Database | RDS, DynamoDB | SQL, NoSQL |
152
+ | Messaging | SQS, SNS, Kinesis | Queues, Pub/Sub, Streaming |
153
153
 
154
- ## Cloud-Native Principles
155
- - Design for failure
156
- - Use managed services
157
- - Automate everything
158
- - Monitor and alert
154
+ ## Cloud-Native Principles
155
+ - Design for failure
156
+ - Use managed services
157
+ - Automate everything
158
+ - Monitor and alert
159
159
  - id: code_quality
160
160
  name: Code Quality & Review
161
161
  human:
@@ -188,9 +188,9 @@ skills:
188
188
  engineering.
189
189
  agent:
190
190
  name: code-quality-review
191
- description: |
192
- Guide for writing quality code and conducting code reviews. Use when
193
- reviewing code, checking for best practices, or verifying AI-generated
191
+ description: Guide for writing quality code and conducting code reviews.
192
+ useWhen: |
193
+ Reviewing code, checking for best practices, or verifying AI-generated
194
194
  code before committing.
195
195
  stages:
196
196
  specify:
@@ -258,13 +258,13 @@ skills:
258
258
  - CI pipeline passes all checks
259
259
  - No regressions detected
260
260
  - Deployment verified
261
- reference: |
262
- ## Review Checklist
261
+ implementationReference: |
262
+ ## Review Checklist
263
263
 
264
- 1. **Correctness**: Does it work as intended?
265
- 2. **Tests**: Is it properly tested?
266
- 3. **Maintainability**: Will it be easy to change?
267
- 4. **Style**: Does it follow conventions?
264
+ 1. **Correctness**: Does it work as intended?
265
+ 2. **Tests**: Is it properly tested?
266
+ 3. **Maintainability**: Will it be easy to change?
267
+ 4. **Style**: Does it follow conventions?
268
268
  - id: data_modeling
269
269
  name: Data Modeling
270
270
  human:
@@ -297,8 +297,10 @@ skills:
297
297
  name: data-modeling
298
298
  description: |
299
299
  Guide for designing database schemas, data structures, and data
300
- architectures. Use when designing tables, optimizing queries, or
301
- making decisions about data storage technologies.
300
+ architectures.
301
+ useWhen: |
302
+ Designing tables, optimizing queries, or making decisions about data
303
+ storage technologies.
302
304
  stages:
303
305
  specify:
304
306
  focus: |
@@ -365,12 +367,12 @@ skills:
365
367
  - Data integrity verified
366
368
  - Performance meets requirements
367
369
  - Rollback procedure tested
368
- reference: |
369
- ## Storage Selection Guide
370
+ implementationReference: |
371
+ ## Storage Selection Guide
370
372
 
371
- | Type | Use When | Examples |
372
- |------|----------|----------|
373
- | Relational | ACID needed, complex queries | PostgreSQL, MySQL |
374
- | Document | Flexible schema, hierarchical | MongoDB, Firestore |
375
- | Key-Value | Simple lookups, caching | Redis, DynamoDB |
376
- | Time Series | Temporal data, metrics | InfluxDB, TimescaleDB |
373
+ | Type | Use When | Examples |
374
+ |------|----------|----------|
375
+ | Relational | ACID needed, complex queries | PostgreSQL, MySQL |
376
+ | Document | Flexible schema, hierarchical | MongoDB, Firestore |
377
+ | Key-Value | Simple lookups, caching | Redis, DynamoDB |
378
+ | Time Series | Temporal data, metrics | InfluxDB, TimescaleDB |
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
3
3
  specialization: Engineering Management
4
4
  roleTitle: Engineering Manager
5
5
  isManagement: true
6
- minGrade: SE
6
+ minGrade: L2
7
7
 
8
8
  description: |
9
9
  People and delivery leadership, focusing on team effectiveness,
@@ -55,3 +55,15 @@ entityDefinitions:
55
55
  emoji: "🤖"
56
56
  description: |
57
57
  AI coding agent configurations generated from the same disciplines, tracks, and skills that define human roles. Agent profiles and skills follow the GitHub Copilot specification, ensuring AI assistants understand context, constraints, and working styles aligned with human engineering expectations.
58
+
59
+ stage:
60
+ title: Stages
61
+ emoji: "🔄"
62
+ description: |
63
+ Defined phases of the engineering lifecycle that structure work from planning through delivery and review. Stages provide context for AI agents and define entry criteria, exit criteria, and appropriate handoffs between phases.
64
+
65
+ tool:
66
+ title: Tools
67
+ emoji: "🔧"
68
+ description: |
69
+ Recommended tools and utilities referenced by skills for effective engineering workflows. Tools are linked to specific skills with guidance on when and how to use them, surfacing best practices directly in skill definitions.