@event4u/agent-config 6.1.0 → 7.0.0

package/src/scripts/ai_council/one_off_archive/2026-05/_one_off_phase_2a_budget_rebalance.py

@@ -1,257 +0,0 @@
-"""Council adjudication of Phase 2A always-budget overshoot.
-
-Phase 2A of road-to-structural-optimization slimmed the top-3
-budget-consuming `type: always` rules (language-and-tone,
-ask-when-uncertain, direct-answers) by extracting MECHANICS into
-contexts under contexts/communication/rules-always/. Under the
-locked Model (b) literal, the extended budget grew from 47,448 to
-52,534 chars (49,000 cap → 107.2 %), 5.2 pp above the 2 % G3
-tolerance band defined in
-docs/contracts/load-context-budget-model.md.
-
-Per that contract: an overshoot above the band rejects the model
-and escalates to council. Phase 2A § Abort/rollback fires its
-budget kill-switch in this exact case.
-
-This one-off bundles the linter output, the three slimmed rules,
-the three new mechanics contexts, and the locked budget contract,
-and asks the council to pick the smallest viable resolution.
-
-Invocation:
-    .venv/bin/python -m scripts.ai_council._one_off_phase_2a_budget_rebalance
-"""
-from __future__ import annotations
-
-import sys
-from pathlib import Path
-
-from scripts.ai_council.bundler import bundle_files
-from scripts.ai_council.clients import (
-    AnthropicClient,
-    OpenAIClient,
-    load_anthropic_key,
-    load_openai_key,
-)
-from scripts.ai_council.orchestrator import (
-    CostBudget,
-    CouncilQuestion,
-    consult,
-    estimate,
-)
-from scripts.ai_council.pricing import estimate_cost, load_prices
-from scripts.ai_council.project_context import detect_project_context
-from scripts.ai_council.session import SessionManifest, save as save_session
-
-REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3]
-ARTEFACTS = [
-    REPO_ROOT / "docs/contracts/load-context-budget-model.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / ".agent-src.uncondensed/rules/language-and-tone.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / ".agent-src.uncondensed/rules/ask-when-uncertain.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / ".agent-src.uncondensed/rules/direct-answers.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / ".agent-src.uncondensed/contexts/communication/rules-always/language-and-tone-mechanics.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / ".agent-src.uncondensed/contexts/communication/rules-always/ask-when-uncertain-mechanics.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / ".agent-src.uncondensed/contexts/communication/rules-always/direct-answers-mechanics.md",
-]
-
-ORIGINAL_ASK = (
-    "Phase 2A of road-to-structural-optimization slimmed the top-3 "
-    "always-rules and breached the 2 % G3 tolerance band on the "
-    "always-budget under Model (b) literal. The contract requires "
-    "council escalation. Council task: pick the smallest viable "
-    "resolution from a fixed option set."
-)
-
-REVIEW_PROMPT = """\
-# Council Adjudication — Phase 2A Always-Budget Overshoot
-
-## Measured state (linter output, model (b) literal)
-
-```
-FAIL  always-rule extended budget: 52,534 / 49,000 chars (107.2%)
-      thresholds: warn 80% · fail 90% · per-rule ≤ 6,000 (ext) ·
-                  top-3 ≤ 24,500 (ext) · depth ≤ 2 · G3 band ≤ +2%
-
-  ext= 8529  raw= 4636  scope-control.md (top-3)  allowlisted ≤ 8,529
-  ext= 7887  raw= 4607  non-destructive-by-default.md (top-3)  allowlisted ≤ 7,887
-  ext= 6827  raw= 2424  ask-when-uncertain.md (top-3)  PER-RULE BREACH
-  ext= 6283  raw= 2758  direct-answers.md  PER-RULE BREACH
-  ext= 5863  raw= 3658  language-and-tone.md
-  ext= 5781  raw= 3309  commit-policy.md
-  ext= 5481  raw= 2196  verify-before-complete.md
-  ext= 4415  raw= 4415  no-cheap-questions.md
-  ext= 1468  raw= 1468  agent-authority.md
-```
-
-Pre-Phase-2A baseline (Phase 0.2.3 retroactive test, locked):
-**47,448 / 49,000 = 96.8 %** (within tolerance, model (b) accepted).
-
-Phase-2A delta per slimmed rule (raw rule shrank, mechanics
-context loaded as new dependency):
-
-| Rule | ext before | ext after | delta |
-|---|---:|---:|---:|
-| language-and-tone | 5,832 | 5,863 | +31 |
-| ask-when-uncertain | 5,196 | 6,827 | +1,631 |
-| direct-answers | 4,722 | 6,283 | +1,561 |
-
-Phase 0.4 worked example council-locked the +1,561 delta on
-direct-answers. ask-when-uncertain (+1,631) is structurally
-identical. The total overshoot is **+3,534 chars over cap**.
-
-## Why the literal model can no longer hit budget
-
-Under model (b) literal each rule pays full cost for every context
-it loads. Each mechanics extraction adds ~1.5–2 KB of frontmatter +
-headers + context-introduction overhead per rule. Phase 2A is
-structurally unable to satisfy the roadmap success criterion
-("budget delta ≥ −5 %") under model (b); extraction *always* adds
-overhead unless mechanics are consolidated and shared across rules.
-
-## Fixed option set (pick exactly one)
-
-- **R1 — Switch to Model (c) shared-divisor.** Reserved by the
-  contract as "first refinement step if the 2 % tolerance band is
-  exceeded". Under (c), `Σ RawSize(c) / N_loaders`. Currently each
-  mechanics file has N=1, so (c) reduces to (b). Buy-in for (c)
-  enables R5 below.
-- **R2 — Raise TOTAL_CAP.** Set cap to 56,000 chars (current
-  utilization 93.8 % under new cap). Acknowledges extraction
-  overhead is real; freezes Phase 2A wins; abandons the −5 %
-  delta success criterion.
-- **R3 — Raise PER_RULE_CAP to 7,000 + add allowlist entries +
-  raise TOTAL_CAP to 54,000.** Minimal-change variant: keeps the
-  shape, accepts the two new per-rule breaches, raises cap
-  modestly.
-- **R4 — Revert Phase 2A.** Abandon mechanics extraction on the
-  three rules; restore them to original size; mark Phase 2A as
-  "structurally infeasible under locked contract"; close roadmap
-  phase.
-- **R5 — Consolidate the three mechanics into one shared context
-  + adopt R1.** Single `rules-always-mechanics.md` loaded by all
-  three slimmed rules; under (c) each rule pays 1/3 of the
-  consolidated context size. Highest engineering cost, only path
-  that delivers a net negative delta.
-
-## Output Contract (STRICT)
-
-```
-### Verdict
-**Choice:** <R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5>
-**One-sentence rationale:** <≤ 30 words>
-```
-
-```
-### Required follow-up actions (numbered, ≤ 4)
-  1. <smallest concrete step, files named>
-  2. <...>
-```
-
-```
-### Risk note
-**Single biggest risk of the chosen option:** <one sentence>
-**Mitigation:** <one sentence>
-```
-
-```
-### Contract amendment needed?
-**Amend load-context-budget-model.md?** <YES — section · NO>
-**Amend road-to-structural-optimization Phase 2A success criterion?**
-  <YES — new criterion in 1 line · NO>
-```
-
-Be decisive — total response ≤ 1,000 words. Artefacts follow
-verbatim.
-"""
-
-
-def main() -> int:
-    anthropic = AnthropicClient(api_key=load_anthropic_key(), model="claude-sonnet-4-5")
-    openai = OpenAIClient(api_key=load_openai_key(), model="gpt-4o")
-    members = [anthropic, openai]
-
-    context = bundle_files(ARTEFACTS)
-    project = detect_project_context(REPO_ROOT)
-    table = load_prices()
-
-    user_prompt = REVIEW_PROMPT + "\n\n---\n\n" + context.text
-
-    question = CouncilQuestion(
-        mode="files",
-        user_prompt=user_prompt,
-        max_tokens=2560,
-    )
-
-    estimates = estimate(
-        question, members, table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
-    )
-    print("=== ESTIMATE (single round) ===")
-    total_est = 0.0
-    for c, e in zip(members, estimates):
-        print(f"  {c.name}/{c.model}: ~{e.input_tokens} in + {e.output_tokens} out = ${e.total_usd:.4f}")
-        total_est += e.total_usd
-    print(f"  TOTAL per round (max): ${total_est:.4f}")
-    print()
-
-    budget = CostBudget(
-        max_input_tokens=200_000,
-        max_output_tokens=80_000,
-        max_calls=20,
-        max_total_usd=2.50,
-    )
-
-    rounds_collected: list[list] = []
-
-    def _on_round_complete(round_idx: int, round_responses) -> None:
-        rounds_collected.append(list(round_responses))
-        print(f"=== ROUND {round_idx + 1} COMPLETE ===")
-        for r in round_responses:
-            if r.error:
-                print(f"  [error] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.error}")
-                continue
-            actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
-            print(f"  [done] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.input_tokens} in / "
-                  f"{r.output_tokens} out · {r.latency_ms} ms · ${actual.total_usd:.4f}")
-        print()
-
-    print("=== CONSULT (1 round, Phase 2A budget rebalance) ===")
-    consult(
-        members, question, budget,
-        rounds=1,
-        on_round_complete=_on_round_complete,
-        table=table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
-    )
-
-    if not rounds_collected:
-        print("[error] no rounds completed", file=sys.stderr)
-        return 1
-
-    actual_total = 0.0
-    for round_responses in rounds_collected:
-        for r in round_responses:
-            if r.error:
-                continue
-            actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
-            actual_total += actual.total_usd
-    print(f"=== TOTAL ACTUAL: ${actual_total:.4f} ===")
-
-    final_round = rounds_collected[-1]
-    if not [r for r in final_round if not r.error]:
-        return 1
-
-    manifest = SessionManifest(
-        mode="files",
-        artefact="agents/roadmaps/road-to-structural-optimization.md",
-        original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
-        members=[f"{r.provider}/{r.model}" for r in final_round],
-        rounds=len(rounds_collected),
-        cost_usd_estimated=total_est,
-        cost_usd_actual=actual_total,
-        extra={"purpose": "Phase 2A always-budget overshoot adjudication"},
-    )
-    session_dir = save_session(manifest=manifest, responses=rounds_collected)
-    print(f"[saved] {session_dir.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}/")
-    return 1 if any(r.error for round_r in rounds_collected for r in round_r) else 0
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    raise SystemExit(main())

package/src/scripts/ai_council/one_off_archive/2026-05/_one_off_phase_2a_post_revert.py

@@ -1,197 +0,0 @@
-"""Council adjudication of post-revert always-budget contract.
-
-Phase 2A executed R4 (revert) per the prior council verdict. The
-three slimmed always-rules and their mechanics contexts have been
-restored; mechanics-context directory removed. Measured state on
-this branch is now 47,448 / 49,000 chars = 96.8 % — strictly better
-than `main` at 100.6 % which currently passes via the G3 tolerance
-band.
-
-The strict 90 % FAIL gate in scripts/check_always_budget.py was
-written assuming Phase 2A would succeed in dropping utilization
-below 90 %. Phase 2A is now structurally infeasible under model (b)
-(per the previous council finding) and the cap-tightening was
-deferred to Phase 5. Branch must unblock CI without regressing the
-contract spirit.
-
-Council task: pick the smallest viable reconciliation.
-"""
-from __future__ import annotations
-
-import sys
-from pathlib import Path
-
-from scripts.ai_council.bundler import bundle_files
-from scripts.ai_council.clients import (
-    AnthropicClient,
-    OpenAIClient,
-    load_anthropic_key,
-    load_openai_key,
-)
-from scripts.ai_council.orchestrator import (
-    CostBudget,
-    CouncilQuestion,
-    consult,
-    estimate,
-)
-from scripts.ai_council.pricing import estimate_cost, load_prices
-from scripts.ai_council.project_context import detect_project_context
-from scripts.ai_council.session import SessionManifest, save as save_session
-
-REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3]
-ARTEFACTS = [
-    REPO_ROOT / "docs/contracts/load-context-budget-model.md",
-    REPO_ROOT / "src/scripts/check_always_budget.py",
-]
-
-ORIGINAL_ASK = (
-    "Phase 2A reverted (R4) per prior council verdict. Branch budget is "
-    "96.8 % (gap-zone FAIL); main is 100.6 % (PASS via G3 band). Branch "
-    "is strictly better than main yet rejected by the strict 90 % gate. "
-    "Pick the smallest contract reconciliation to unblock CI."
-)
-
-REVIEW_PROMPT = """\
-# Council Adjudication — Post-Revert Always-Budget Reconciliation
-
-## Current state (after R4 revert is committed locally)
-
-```
-FAIL  always-rule extended budget: 47,448 / 49,000 chars (96.8%)
-      thresholds: warn 80% · fail 90% · per-rule ≤ 6,000 (ext) ·
-                  top-3 ≤ 24,500 (ext) · depth ≤ 2 · G3 band ≤ +2%
-```
-
-`main` (last green): **49,311 / 49,000 = 100.6 %** — passes because
-the linter only rejects 90–100 % (gap zone) and > 102 %; 100–102 %
-is the documented G3 tolerance band.
-
-This branch is objectively closer to the cap than `main` but
-rejected. The 90 % gate was written under the assumption Phase 2A
-would land below 90 %. Phase 2A is structurally infeasible under
-model (b) (prior council finding); roadmap re-routes the trim to
-Phase 5 via either model (c) shared-divisor or shared-mechanics
-consolidation.
-
-## Fixed option set (pick exactly one)
-
-- **A1 — Recovery-band carve-out.** Extend the linter so "current
-  pct ≤ last-green-`main` pct AND pct ≤ 100 %" becomes a documented
-  `WARN (recovery band)`, not FAIL. Persists until Phase 5
-  re-tightens. No baseline regression possible; needs `main`-pct
-  lookup (committed scalar in repo or CI artifact).
-- **A2 — Lower FAIL_THRESHOLD to 100 %.** Drop the 90 % gate to
-  match the contract's spirit ("< cap is acceptable; > cap +2 %
-  fails"). Phase 5 re-tightens to 85 %/95 % per its own task list.
-  Smallest diff. Risk: removes the early-warning gate.
-- **A3 — Trim ~3.4k chars from current rules.** Find another
-  candidate (none of the three Phase-2A targets, since 2A proved
-  extraction adds overhead). Risk: the next-largest rules touch
-  the safety floor (Q3=A locked).
-- **A4 — Bump TOTAL_CAP to 53,000 + keep 90 % FAIL.** Rewrites the
-  contract's total cap upward; freezes current state at ~89.5 %.
-  Defers Phase 5 trim to a separate roadmap. Cleanest CI but
-  contract drift.
-- **A5 — Mark phase as `irreducible-at-current-method` and freeze
-  the linter at current state.** Pin a `CURRENT_BASELINE = 47_448`
-  ceiling alongside the 90 % gate; PASS while pct ≤ baseline,
-  FAIL on regression. Deflects Phase 5 work upstream into model (c).
-
-## Constraints
-
-- Safety-floor rules (`non-destructive-by-default`, `commit-policy`,
-  `scope-control`, `verify-before-complete`) are Q3=A locked and
-  may not be slimmed.
-- `road-to-structural-optimization` Phase 5 owns the long-term
-  trim — do not duplicate work into Phase 2A.
-- The four other phases (1, 2B, 3, 4, 6) on this branch are
-  blocked by this CI gate; the choice gates roadmap throughput.
-
-## Output Contract (STRICT)
-
-```
-### Verdict
-**Choice:** <A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5>
-**One-sentence rationale:** <≤ 30 words>
-```
-
-```
-### Required follow-up actions (numbered, ≤ 4)
-  1. <smallest concrete step, files named>
-  2. <...>
-```
-
-```
-### Risk note
-**Single biggest risk of the chosen option:** <one sentence>
-**Mitigation:** <one sentence>
-```
-
-```
-### Contract amendment needed?
-**Amend load-context-budget-model.md?** <YES — section · NO>
-**Amend road-to-structural-optimization Phase 5 success criterion?**
-  <YES — new criterion in 1 line · NO>
-```
-
-Be decisive — total response ≤ 800 words. Artefacts follow verbatim.
-"""
-
-
-def main() -> int:
-    anthropic = AnthropicClient(api_key=load_anthropic_key(), model="claude-sonnet-4-5")
-    openai = OpenAIClient(api_key=load_openai_key(), model="gpt-4o")
-    members = [anthropic, openai]
-
-    context = bundle_files(ARTEFACTS)
-    project = detect_project_context(REPO_ROOT)
-    table = load_prices()
-
-    user_prompt = REVIEW_PROMPT + "\n\n---\n\n" + context.text
-
-    question = CouncilQuestion(mode="files", user_prompt=user_prompt, max_tokens=2048)
-    estimates = estimate(question, members, table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK)
-    print("=== ESTIMATE (single round) ===")
-    total_est = 0.0
-    for c, e in zip(members, estimates):
-        print(f"  {c.name}/{c.model}: ~{e.input_tokens} in + {e.output_tokens} out = ${e.total_usd:.4f}")
-        total_est += e.total_usd
-    print(f"  TOTAL per round (max): ${total_est:.4f}")
-
-    budget = CostBudget(max_input_tokens=200_000, max_output_tokens=80_000, max_calls=20, max_total_usd=2.50)
-    rounds_collected: list[list] = []
-
-    def _on_round_complete(round_idx, round_responses) -> None:
-        rounds_collected.append(list(round_responses))
-        print(f"=== ROUND {round_idx + 1} COMPLETE ===")
-        for r in round_responses:
-            if r.error:
-                print(f"  [error] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.error}")
-                continue
-            a = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
-            print(f"  [done] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.input_tokens} in / {r.output_tokens} out · ${a.total_usd:.4f}")
-
-    print("=== CONSULT (1 round, post-revert reconciliation) ===")
-    consult(members, question, budget, rounds=1, on_round_complete=_on_round_complete,
-            table=table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK)
-    if not rounds_collected:
-        return 1
-    actual = sum(estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table).total_usd
-                 for rr in rounds_collected for r in rr if not r.error)
-    print(f"=== TOTAL ACTUAL: ${actual:.4f} ===")
-    final = rounds_collected[-1]
-    if not [r for r in final if not r.error]:
-        return 1
-    manifest = SessionManifest(
-        mode="files", artefact="agents/roadmaps/road-to-structural-optimization.md",
-        original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK, members=[f"{r.provider}/{r.model}" for r in final],
-        rounds=len(rounds_collected), cost_usd_estimated=total_est, cost_usd_actual=actual,
-        extra={"purpose": "Post-revert always-budget contract reconciliation"},
-    )
-    sd = save_session(manifest=manifest, responses=rounds_collected)
-    print(f"[saved] {sd.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}/")
-    return 0
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    raise SystemExit(main())

package/src/scripts/ai_council/one_off_archive/2026-05/_one_off_rebalancing_audit.py

@@ -1,149 +0,0 @@
-"""One-off council consultation — Phase 0 audit findings on rebalancing roadmap.
-
-Validates whether the rebalancing roadmap premise still holds against the
-actual PR #34 diff. Transient script; can be deleted after the consult runs.
-
-Invocation:
-    .venv/bin/python -m scripts.ai_council._one_off_rebalancing_audit
-"""
-from __future__ import annotations
-
-import sys
-from pathlib import Path
-
-from scripts.ai_council.clients import AnthropicClient, load_anthropic_key
-from scripts.ai_council.orchestrator import CostBudget, CouncilQuestion, consult, estimate
-from scripts.ai_council.pricing import estimate_cost, load_prices
-from scripts.ai_council.project_context import detect_project_context
-
-REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[3]
-
-ORIGINAL_ASK = (
-    "Phase 0 audit of the rebalancing roadmap. The roadmap was written based on "
-    "five rounds of external review claiming PR #34 over-deleted implicit "
-    "expertise. Validate whether the premise still holds against the actual diff. "
-    "Three concrete questions: (1) is the deletion narrative supported by the "
-    "numbers? (2) which of the 6 phases are already done or moot? "
-    "(3) what is the actual minimum-viable scope still worth executing?"
-)
-
-ARTEFACT = """# Phase 0 audit findings - road-to-rebalancing.md
-
-## Premise from the roadmap
-
-The risk surface is whether implicit expertise (edge cases, decision forks,
-failure modes, anti-patterns) was trimmed alongside the redundancy.
-Rebalancing means restoring intelligence without re-inflating Always-rules.
-
-## Actual numbers from the PR #34 diff
-
-Scope: git diff origin/main...HEAD, path .agent-src.uncondensed/rules/
-
-- 35 files changed: 202 insertions, 204 deletions => net -2 lines total.
-- Largest delta: language-and-tone.md 37 ins / 96 del. The 96 lines were
-  EXTRACTED to docs/guidelines/language-and-tone-examples.md (79 lines),
-  not deleted. Net knowledge loss: ~17 lines of duplicated phrasing.
-- Second-largest: roadmap-progress-sync.md 26 ins / 33 del - minor.
-- All other rules: <=8 line changes each, mostly renames.
-- ZERO rule files deleted outright.
-
-## Phase-by-phase realities
-
-### Phase 0 - Removed-Knowledge Audit
-This document IS Phase 0. Findings: 80% redundancy, examples extracted to
-safe layer, zero decision-logic deletions. Phase 0 is now COMPLETE.
-
-### Phase 1 - Pilot Context Split (3 rules)
-Candidates: autonomous-execution, minimal-safe-diff, scope-control.
-- autonomous-execution: 8 line delta in PR, no extraction yet.
-- minimal-safe-diff: already auto-trigger; 6 line delta.
-- scope-control: 40 line ADDITION (not deletion) in this PR. Pilot value low.
-
-### Phase 2 - load_context: convention + linter
-0 rules use load_context: today. Convention does not exist.
-Genuinely net-new work.
-
-### Phase 3 - Guidelines domain folders
-Already done. 47 guidelines, 46 already in domain folders
-(agent-infra/, docs/, e2e/, php/). Only language-and-tone-examples.md
-is flat at root. Phase 3 reduces to deciding where the one flat file goes.
-
-### Phase 4 - Golden-Transcript-backed demos under examples/flows/
-Partially shipped. docs/end-to-end-walkthroughs.md (built last cycle)
-already does this with 4 traces anchored to GT-1, GT-P1, GT-U2, GT-2.
-Required cases per roadmap: implement-ticket-demo, work-freeform-demo,
-ui-track-demo, blocked-path-demo (all covered) plus mixed-flow-demo
-(NOT covered yet).
-Net-new: 1 mixed-flow demo + folder move from docs/ to examples/flows/.
-
-### Phase 5 - Rule priority hierarchy + interaction matrix
-Partially shipped. docs/contracts/rule-interactions.yml and
-rule-interactions.md exist (13 pairs across 9 rules).
-rule-priority-hierarchy.md does NOT exist.
-
-### Phase 6 - Senior-agent behavior tests
-Not started. Net-new work, but only valuable if Phase 1 actually runs
-and produces something to validate.
-
-## Question to council
-
-Given:
-- The deletion narrative is empirically thin (-2 net lines after extraction).
-- 3 of 6 phases are already done or near-done.
-- Phase 1 pilot value is questionable on the 3 named candidates.
-
-Should this roadmap:
-
-(A) Close out as substantially-already-done. Execute only the small delta
-    (1 mixed-flow demo, move walkthroughs to examples/flows/, add the
-    priority-hierarchy doc, add load_context: convention if cheap),
-    then archive.
-
-(B) Drop Phase 1 pilot - the three named candidates don't show evidence of
-    over-deletion. Execute Phase 2 + Phase 4 (1 missing demo + restructure)
-    + Phase 5 (priority-hierarchy doc) only.
-
-(C) Original full scope - assume the audit missed something subtle and run
-    all 6 phases as written.
-
-(D) Other framing - propose a tighter scope based on what the audit shows.
-
-Identify blind spots: did the diff miss content moves between branches?
-Are there rules whose implicit expertise lives in non-line-count signal?
-Recommend (A/B/C/D) with rationale.
-"""
-
-
-def main() -> int:
-    api_key = load_anthropic_key()
-    client = AnthropicClient(api_key=api_key)
-    project = detect_project_context(REPO_ROOT)
-    table = load_prices()
-
-    question = CouncilQuestion(mode="roadmap", user_prompt=ARTEFACT, max_tokens=2048)
-    estimates = estimate(question, [client], table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK)
-    print(f"[estimate] ~{estimates[0].input_tokens} in + {estimates[0].output_tokens} out = ${estimates[0].total_usd:.4f}")
-
-    budget = CostBudget(
-        max_input_tokens=50_000, max_output_tokens=20_000,
-        max_calls=5, max_total_usd=0.50,
-    )
-
-    print(f"[consult] calling {client.name}/{client.model} ...")
-    responses = consult([client], question, budget, table=table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK)
-    if not responses or responses[0].error:
-        err = responses[0].error if responses else "no response"
-        print(f"[error] {err}", file=sys.stderr)
-        return 1
-
-    r = responses[0]
-    actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
-    print(f"[done] {r.input_tokens} in / {r.output_tokens} out, {r.latency_ms} ms, actual ${actual.total_usd:.4f}")
-    print("=" * 72)
-    print(r.text)
-    print("=" * 72)
-    return 0
-
-
-if __name__ == "__main__":
-    raise SystemExit(main())