npm - @delorenj/pjangler - Versions diffs - 1.2.25 → 1.3.0 - Mend

@delorenj/pjangler 1.2.25 → 1.3.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.

Files changed (849) hide show

package/templates/commonproject/_bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/atdd/instructions.md DELETED Viewed

@@ -1,806 +0,0 @@
-<!-- Powered by BMAD-CORE™ -->
-# Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD)
-**Workflow ID**: `_bmad/bmm/testarch/atdd`
-**Version**: 4.0 (BMad v6)
----
-## Overview
-Generates failing acceptance tests BEFORE implementation following TDD's red-green-refactor cycle. This workflow creates comprehensive test coverage at appropriate levels (E2E, API, Component) with supporting infrastructure (fixtures, factories, mocks) and provides an implementation checklist to guide development.
-**Core Principle**: Tests fail first (red phase), then guide development to green, then enable confident refactoring.
----
-## Preflight Requirements
-**Critical:** Verify these requirements before proceeding. If any fail, HALT and notify the user.
-- ✅ Story approved with clear acceptance criteria
-- ✅ Development sandbox/environment ready
-- ✅ Framework scaffolding exists (run `framework` workflow if missing)
-- ✅ Test framework configuration available (playwright.config.ts or cypress.config.ts)
----
-## Step 1: Load Story Context and Requirements
-### Actions
-1. **Read Story Markdown**
-   - Load story file from `{story_file}` variable
-   - Extract acceptance criteria (all testable requirements)
-   - Identify affected systems and components
-   - Note any technical constraints or dependencies
-2. **Load Framework Configuration**
-   - Read framework config (playwright.config.ts or cypress.config.ts)
-   - Identify test directory structure
-   - Check existing fixture patterns
-   - Note test runner capabilities
-3. **Load Existing Test Patterns**
-   - Search `{test_dir}` for similar tests
-   - Identify reusable fixtures and helpers
-   - Check data factory patterns
-   - Note naming conventions
-4. **Check Playwright Utils Flag**
-   Read `{config_source}` and check `config.tea_use_playwright_utils`.
-5. **Load Knowledge Base Fragments**
-   **Critical:** Consult `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/testarch/tea-index.csv` to load:
-   **Core Patterns (Always load):**
-   - `data-factories.md` - Factory patterns using faker (override patterns, nested factories, API seeding, 498 lines, 5 examples)
-   - `component-tdd.md` - Component test strategies (red-green-refactor, provider isolation, accessibility, visual regression, 480 lines, 4 examples)
-   - `test-quality.md` - Test design principles (deterministic tests, isolated with cleanup, explicit assertions, length limits, execution time optimization, 658 lines, 5 examples)
-   - `test-healing-patterns.md` - Common failure patterns and healing strategies (stale selectors, race conditions, dynamic data, network errors, hard waits, 648 lines, 5 examples)
-   - `selector-resilience.md` - Selector best practices (data-testid > ARIA > text > CSS hierarchy, dynamic patterns, anti-patterns, 541 lines, 4 examples)
-   - `timing-debugging.md` - Race condition prevention and async debugging (network-first, deterministic waiting, anti-patterns, 370 lines, 3 examples)
-   **If `config.tea_use_playwright_utils: true` (All Utilities):**
-   - `overview.md` - Playwright utils for ATDD patterns
-   - `api-request.md` - API test examples with schema validation
-   - `network-recorder.md` - HAR record/playback for UI acceptance tests
-   - `auth-session.md` - Auth setup for acceptance tests
-   - `intercept-network-call.md` - Network interception in ATDD scenarios
-   - `recurse.md` - Polling for async acceptance criteria
-   - `log.md` - Logging in ATDD tests
-   - `file-utils.md` - File download validation in acceptance tests
-   - `network-error-monitor.md` - Catch silent failures in ATDD
-   - `fixtures-composition.md` - Composing utilities for ATDD
-   **If `config.tea_use_playwright_utils: false`:**
-   - `fixture-architecture.md` - Test fixture patterns with auto-cleanup (pure function → fixture → mergeTests composition, 406 lines, 5 examples)
-   - `network-first.md` - Route interception patterns (intercept before navigate, HAR capture, deterministic waiting, 489 lines, 5 examples)
-**Halt Condition:** If story has no acceptance criteria or framework is missing, HALT with message: "ATDD requires clear acceptance criteria and test framework setup"
----
-## Step 1.5: Generation Mode Selection (NEW - Phase 2.5)
-### Actions
-1. **Detect Generation Mode**
-   Determine mode based on scenario complexity:
-   **AI Generation Mode (DEFAULT)**:
-   - Clear acceptance criteria with standard patterns
-   - Uses: AI-generated tests from requirements
-   - Appropriate for: CRUD, auth, navigation, API tests
-   - Fastest approach
-   **Recording Mode (OPTIONAL - Complex UI)**:
-   - Complex UI interactions (drag-drop, wizards, multi-page flows)
-   - Uses: Interactive test recording with Playwright MCP
-   - Appropriate for: Visual workflows, unclear requirements
-   - Only if config.tea_use_mcp_enhancements is true AND MCP available
-2. **AI Generation Mode (DEFAULT - Continue to Step 2)**
-   For standard scenarios:
-   - Continue with existing workflow (Step 2: Select Test Levels and Strategy)
-   - AI generates tests based on acceptance criteria from Step 1
-   - Use knowledge base patterns for test structure
-3. **Recording Mode (OPTIONAL - Complex UI Only)**
-   For complex UI scenarios AND config.tea_use_mcp_enhancements is true:
-   **A. Check MCP Availability**
-   If Playwright MCP tools are available in your IDE:
-   - Use MCP recording mode (Step 3.B)
-   If MCP unavailable:
-   - Fallback to AI generation mode (silent, automatic)
-   - Continue to Step 2
-   **B. Interactive Test Recording (MCP-Based)**
-   Use Playwright MCP test-generator tools:
-   **Setup:**
-   ```
-   1. Use generator_setup_page to initialize recording session
-   2. Navigate to application starting URL (from story context)
-   3. Ready to record user interactions
-   ```
-   **Recording Process (Per Acceptance Criterion):**
-   ```
-   4. Read acceptance criterion from story
-   5. Manually execute test scenario using browser_* tools:
-      - browser_navigate: Navigate to pages
-      - browser_click: Click buttons, links, elements
-      - browser_type: Fill form fields
-      - browser_select: Select dropdown options
-      - browser_check: Check/uncheck checkboxes
-   6. Add verification steps using browser_verify_* tools:
-      - browser_verify_text: Verify text content
-      - browser_verify_visible: Verify element visibility
-      - browser_verify_url: Verify URL navigation
-   7. Capture interaction log with generator_read_log
-   8. Generate test file with generator_write_test
-   9. Repeat for next acceptance criterion
-   ```
-   **Post-Recording Enhancement:**
-   ```
-   10. Review generated test code
-   11. Enhance with knowledge base patterns:
-       - Add Given-When-Then comments
-       - Replace recorded selectors with data-testid (if needed)
-       - Add network-first interception (from network-first.md)
-       - Add fixtures for auth/data setup (from fixture-architecture.md)
-       - Use factories for test data (from data-factories.md)
-   12. Verify tests fail (missing implementation)
-   13. Continue to Step 4 (Build Data Infrastructure)
-   ```
-   **When to Use Recording Mode:**
-   - ✅ Complex UI interactions (drag-drop, multi-step forms, wizards)
-   - ✅ Visual workflows (modals, dialogs, animations)
-   - ✅ Unclear requirements (exploratory, discovering expected behavior)
-   - ✅ Multi-page flows (checkout, registration, onboarding)
-   - ❌ NOT for simple CRUD (AI generation faster)
-   - ❌ NOT for API-only tests (no UI to record)
-   **When to Use AI Generation (Default):**
-   - ✅ Clear acceptance criteria available
-   - ✅ Standard patterns (login, CRUD, navigation)
-   - ✅ Need many tests quickly
-   - ✅ API/backend tests (no UI interaction)
-4. **Proceed to Test Level Selection**
-   After mode selection:
-   - AI Generation: Continue to Step 2 (Select Test Levels and Strategy)
-   - Recording: Skip to Step 4 (Build Data Infrastructure) - tests already generated
----
-## Step 2: Select Test Levels and Strategy
-### Actions
-1. **Analyze Acceptance Criteria**
-   For each acceptance criterion, determine:
-   - Does it require full user journey? → E2E test
-   - Does it test business logic/API contract? → API test
-   - Does it validate UI component behavior? → Component test
-   - Can it be unit tested? → Unit test
-2. **Apply Test Level Selection Framework**
-   **Knowledge Base Reference**: `test-levels-framework.md`
-   **E2E (End-to-End)**:
-   - Critical user journeys (login, checkout, core workflow)
-   - Multi-system integration
-   - User-facing acceptance criteria
-   - **Characteristics**: High confidence, slow execution, brittle
-   **API (Integration)**:
-   - Business logic validation
-   - Service contracts
-   - Data transformations
-   - **Characteristics**: Fast feedback, good balance, stable
-   **Component**:
-   - UI component behavior (buttons, forms, modals)
-   - Interaction testing
-   - Visual regression
-   - **Characteristics**: Fast, isolated, granular
-   **Unit**:
-   - Pure business logic
-   - Edge cases
-   - Error handling
-   - **Characteristics**: Fastest, most granular
-3. **Avoid Duplicate Coverage**
-   Don't test same behavior at multiple levels unless necessary:
-   - Use E2E for critical happy path only
-   - Use API tests for complex business logic variations
-   - Use component tests for UI interaction edge cases
-   - Use unit tests for pure logic edge cases
-4. **Prioritize Tests**
-   If test-design document exists, align with priority levels:
-   - P0 scenarios → Must cover in failing tests
-   - P1 scenarios → Should cover if time permits
-   - P2/P3 scenarios → Optional for this iteration
-**Decision Point:** Set `primary_level` variable to main test level for this story (typically E2E or API)
----
-## Step 3: Generate Failing Tests
-### Actions
-1. **Create Test File Structure**
-   ```
-   tests/
-   ├── e2e/
-   │   └── {feature-name}.spec.ts        # E2E acceptance tests
-   ├── api/
-   │   └── {feature-name}.api.spec.ts    # API contract tests
-   ├── component/
-   │   └── {ComponentName}.test.tsx      # Component tests
-   └── support/
-       ├── fixtures/                      # Test fixtures
-       ├── factories/                     # Data factories
-       └── helpers/                       # Utility functions
-   ```
-2. **Write Failing E2E Tests (If Applicable)**
-   **Use Given-When-Then format:**
-   ```typescript
-   import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
-   test.describe('User Login', () => {
-     test('should display error for invalid credentials', async ({ page }) => {
-       // GIVEN: User is on login page
-       await page.goto('/login');
-       // WHEN: User submits invalid credentials
-       await page.fill('[data-testid="email-input"]', 'invalid@example.com');
-       await page.fill('[data-testid="password-input"]', 'wrongpassword');
-       await page.click('[data-testid="login-button"]');
-       // THEN: Error message is displayed
-       await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="error-message"]')).toHaveText('Invalid email or password');
-     });
-   });
-   ```
-   **Critical patterns:**
-   - One assertion per test (atomic tests)
-   - Explicit waits (no hard waits/sleeps)
-   - Network-first approach (route interception before navigation)
-   - data-testid selectors for stability
-   - Clear Given-When-Then structure
-3. **Apply Network-First Pattern**
-   **Knowledge Base Reference**: `network-first.md`
-   ```typescript
-   test('should load user dashboard after login', async ({ page }) => {
-     // CRITICAL: Intercept routes BEFORE navigation
-     await page.route('**/api/user', (route) =>
-       route.fulfill({
-         status: 200,
-         body: JSON.stringify({ id: 1, name: 'Test User' }),
-       }),
-     );
-     // NOW navigate
-     await page.goto('/dashboard');
-     await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="user-name"]')).toHaveText('Test User');
-   });
-   ```
-4. **Write Failing API Tests (If Applicable)**
-   ```typescript
-   import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';
-   test.describe('User API', () => {
-     test('POST /api/users - should create new user', async ({ request }) => {
-       // GIVEN: Valid user data
-       const userData = {
-         email: 'newuser@example.com',
-         name: 'New User',
-       };
-       // WHEN: Creating user via API
-       const response = await request.post('/api/users', {
-         data: userData,
-       });
-       // THEN: User is created successfully
-       expect(response.status()).toBe(201);
-       const body = await response.json();
-       expect(body).toMatchObject({
-         email: userData.email,
-         name: userData.name,
-         id: expect.any(Number),
-       });
-     });
-   });
-   ```
-5. **Write Failing Component Tests (If Applicable)**
-   **Knowledge Base Reference**: `component-tdd.md`
-   ```typescript
-   import { test, expect } from '@playwright/experimental-ct-react';
-   import { LoginForm } from './LoginForm';
-   test.describe('LoginForm Component', () => {
-     test('should disable submit button when fields are empty', async ({ mount }) => {
-       // GIVEN: LoginForm is mounted
-       const component = await mount(<LoginForm />);
-       // WHEN: Form is initially rendered
-       const submitButton = component.locator('button[type="submit"]');
-       // THEN: Submit button is disabled
-       await expect(submitButton).toBeDisabled();
-     });
-   });
-   ```
-6. **Verify Tests Fail Initially**
-   **Critical verification:**
-   - Run tests locally to confirm they fail
-   - Failure should be due to missing implementation, not test errors
-   - Failure messages should be clear and actionable
-   - All tests must be in RED phase before sharing with DEV
-**Important:** Tests MUST fail initially. If a test passes before implementation, it's not a valid acceptance test.
----
-## Step 4: Build Data Infrastructure
-### Actions
-1. **Create Data Factories**
-   **Knowledge Base Reference**: `data-factories.md`
-   ```typescript
-   // tests/support/factories/user.factory.ts
-   import { faker } from '@faker-js/faker';
-   export const createUser = (overrides = {}) => ({
-     id: faker.number.int(),
-     email: faker.internet.email(),
-     name: faker.person.fullName(),
-     createdAt: faker.date.recent().toISOString(),
-     ...overrides,
-   });
-   export const createUsers = (count: number) => Array.from({ length: count }, () => createUser());
-   ```
-   **Factory principles:**
-   - Use faker for random data (no hardcoded values)
-   - Support overrides for specific scenarios
-   - Generate complete valid objects
-   - Include helper functions for bulk creation
-2. **Create Test Fixtures**
-   **Knowledge Base Reference**: `fixture-architecture.md`
-   ```typescript
-   // tests/support/fixtures/auth.fixture.ts
-   import { test as base } from '@playwright/test';
-   export const test = base.extend({
-     authenticatedUser: async ({ page }, use) => {
-       // Setup: Create and authenticate user
-       const user = await createUser();
-       await page.goto('/login');
-       await page.fill('[data-testid="email"]', user.email);
-       await page.fill('[data-testid="password"]', 'password123');
-       await page.click('[data-testid="login-button"]');
-       await page.waitForURL('/dashboard');
-       // Provide to test
-       await use(user);
-       // Cleanup: Delete user
-       await deleteUser(user.id);
-     },
-   });
-   ```
-   **Fixture principles:**
-   - Auto-cleanup (always delete created data)
-   - Composable (fixtures can use other fixtures)
-   - Isolated (each test gets fresh data)
-   - Type-safe
-3. **Document Mock Requirements**
-   If external services need mocking, document requirements:
-   ```markdown
-   ### Mock Requirements for DEV Team
-   **Payment Gateway Mock**:
-   - Endpoint: `POST /api/payments`
-   - Success response: `{ status: 'success', transactionId: '123' }`
-   - Failure response: `{ status: 'failed', error: 'Insufficient funds' }`
-   **Email Service Mock**:
-   - Should not send real emails in test environment
-   - Log email contents for verification
-   ```
-4. **List Required data-testid Attributes**
-   ```markdown
-   ### Required data-testid Attributes
-   **Login Page**:
-   - `email-input` - Email input field
-   - `password-input` - Password input field
-   - `login-button` - Submit button
-   - `error-message` - Error message container
-   **Dashboard Page**:
-   - `user-name` - User name display
-   - `logout-button` - Logout button
-   ```
----
-## Step 5: Create Implementation Checklist
-### Actions
-1. **Map Tests to Implementation Tasks**
-   For each failing test, create corresponding implementation task:
-   ```markdown
-   ## Implementation Checklist
-   ### Epic X - User Authentication
-   #### Test: User Login with Valid Credentials
-   - [ ] Create `/login` route
-   - [ ] Implement login form component
-   - [ ] Add email/password validation
-   - [ ] Integrate authentication API
-   - [ ] Add `data-testid` attributes: `email-input`, `password-input`, `login-button`
-   - [ ] Implement error handling
-   - [ ] Run test: `npm run test:e2e -- login.spec.ts`
-   - [ ] ✅ Test passes (green phase)
-   #### Test: Display Error for Invalid Credentials
-   - [ ] Add error state management
-   - [ ] Display error message UI
-   - [ ] Add `data-testid="error-message"`
-   - [ ] Run test: `npm run test:e2e -- login.spec.ts`
-   - [ ] ✅ Test passes (green phase)
-   ```
-2. **Include Red-Green-Refactor Guidance**
-   ```markdown
-   ## Red-Green-Refactor Workflow
-   **RED Phase** (Complete):
-   - ✅ All tests written and failing
-   - ✅ Fixtures and factories created
-   - ✅ Mock requirements documented
-   **GREEN Phase** (DEV Team):
-   1. Pick one failing test
-   2. Implement minimal code to make it pass
-   3. Run test to verify green
-   4. Move to next test
-   5. Repeat until all tests pass
-   **REFACTOR Phase** (DEV Team):
-   1. All tests passing (green)
-   2. Improve code quality
-   3. Extract duplications
-   4. Optimize performance
-   5. Ensure tests still pass
-   ```
-3. **Add Execution Commands**
-   ````markdown
-   ## Running Tests
-   ```bash
-   # Run all failing tests
-   npm run test:e2e
-   # Run specific test file
-   npm run test:e2e -- login.spec.ts
-   # Run tests in headed mode (see browser)
-   npm run test:e2e -- --headed
-   # Debug specific test
-   npm run test:e2e -- login.spec.ts --debug
-   ```
-   ````
-   ```
-   ```
----
-## Step 6: Generate Deliverables
-### Actions
-1. **Create ATDD Checklist Document**
-   Use template structure at `{installed_path}/atdd-checklist-template.md`:
-   - Story summary
-   - Acceptance criteria breakdown
-   - Test files created (with paths)
-   - Data factories created
-   - Fixtures created
-   - Mock requirements
-   - Required data-testid attributes
-   - Implementation checklist
-   - Red-green-refactor workflow
-   - Execution commands
-2. **Verify All Tests Fail**
-   Before finalizing:
-   - Run full test suite locally
-   - Confirm all tests in RED phase
-   - Document expected failure messages
-   - Ensure failures are due to missing implementation, not test bugs
-3. **Write to Output File**
-   Save to `{output_folder}/atdd-checklist-{story_id}.md`
----
-## Important Notes
-### Red-Green-Refactor Cycle
-**RED Phase** (TEA responsibility):
-- Write failing tests first
-- Tests define expected behavior
-- Tests must fail for right reason (missing implementation)
-**GREEN Phase** (DEV responsibility):
-- Implement minimal code to pass tests
-- One test at a time
-- Don't over-engineer
-**REFACTOR Phase** (DEV responsibility):
-- Improve code quality with confidence
-- Tests provide safety net
-- Extract duplications, optimize
-### Given-When-Then Structure
-**GIVEN** (Setup):
-- Arrange test preconditions
-- Create necessary data
-- Navigate to starting point
-**WHEN** (Action):
-- Execute the behavior being tested
-- Single action per test
-**THEN** (Assertion):
-- Verify expected outcome
-- One assertion per test (atomic)
-### Network-First Testing
-**Critical pattern:**
-```typescript
-// ✅ CORRECT: Intercept BEFORE navigation
-await page.route('**/api/data', handler);
-await page.goto('/page');
-// ❌ WRONG: Navigate then intercept (race condition)
-await page.goto('/page');
-await page.route('**/api/data', handler); // Too late!
-```
-### Data Factory Best Practices
-**Use faker for all test data:**
-```typescript
-// ✅ CORRECT: Random data
-email: faker.internet.email();
-// ❌ WRONG: Hardcoded data (collisions, maintenance burden)
-email: 'test@example.com';
-```
-**Auto-cleanup principle:**
-- Every factory that creates data must provide cleanup
-- Fixtures automatically cleanup in teardown
-- No manual cleanup in test code
-### One Assertion Per Test
-**Atomic test design:**
-```typescript
-// ✅ CORRECT: One assertion
-test('should display user name', async ({ page }) => {
-  await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="user-name"]')).toHaveText('John');
-});
-// ❌ WRONG: Multiple assertions (not atomic)
-test('should display user info', async ({ page }) => {
-  await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="user-name"]')).toHaveText('John');
-  await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="user-email"]')).toHaveText('john@example.com');
-});
-```
-**Why?** If second assertion fails, you don't know if first is still valid.
-### Component Test Strategy
-**When to use component tests:**
-- Complex UI interactions (drag-drop, keyboard nav)
-- Form validation logic
-- State management within component
-- Visual edge cases
-**When NOT to use:**
-- Simple rendering (snapshot tests are sufficient)
-- Integration with backend (use E2E or API tests)
-- Full user journeys (use E2E tests)
-### Knowledge Base Integration
-**Core Fragments (Auto-loaded in Step 1):**
-- `fixture-architecture.md` - Pure function → fixture → mergeTests patterns (406 lines, 5 examples)
-- `data-factories.md` - Factory patterns with faker, overrides, API seeding (498 lines, 5 examples)
-- `component-tdd.md` - Red-green-refactor, provider isolation, accessibility, visual regression (480 lines, 4 examples)
-- `network-first.md` - Intercept before navigate, HAR capture, deterministic waiting (489 lines, 5 examples)
-- `test-quality.md` - Deterministic tests, cleanup, explicit assertions, length/time limits (658 lines, 5 examples)
-- `test-healing-patterns.md` - Common failure patterns: stale selectors, race conditions, dynamic data, network errors, hard waits (648 lines, 5 examples)
-- `selector-resilience.md` - Selector hierarchy (data-testid > ARIA > text > CSS), dynamic patterns, anti-patterns (541 lines, 4 examples)
-- `timing-debugging.md` - Race condition prevention, deterministic waiting, async debugging (370 lines, 3 examples)
-**Reference for Test Level Selection:**
-- `test-levels-framework.md` - E2E vs API vs Component vs Unit decision framework (467 lines, 4 examples)
-**Manual Reference (Optional):**
-- Use `tea-index.csv` to find additional specialized fragments as needed
----
-## Output Summary
-After completing this workflow, provide a summary:
-```markdown
-## ATDD Complete - Tests in RED Phase
-**Story**: {story_id}
-**Primary Test Level**: {primary_level}
-**Failing Tests Created**:
-- E2E tests: {e2e_count} tests in {e2e_files}
-- API tests: {api_count} tests in {api_files}
-- Component tests: {component_count} tests in {component_files}
-**Supporting Infrastructure**:
-- Data factories: {factory_count} factories created
-- Fixtures: {fixture_count} fixtures with auto-cleanup
-- Mock requirements: {mock_count} services documented
-**Implementation Checklist**:
-- Total tasks: {task_count}
-- Estimated effort: {effort_estimate} hours
-**Required data-testid Attributes**: {data_testid_count} attributes documented
-**Next Steps for DEV Team**:
-1. Run failing tests: `npm run test:e2e`
-2. Review implementation checklist
-3. Implement one test at a time (RED → GREEN)
-4. Refactor with confidence (tests provide safety net)
-5. Share progress in daily standup
-**Output File**: {output_file}
-**Manual Handoff**: Share `{output_file}` and failing tests with the dev workflow (not auto-consumed).
-**Knowledge Base References Applied**:
-- Fixture architecture patterns
-- Data factory patterns with faker
-- Network-first route interception
-- Component TDD strategies
-- Test quality principles
-```
----
-## Validation
-After completing all steps, verify:
-- [ ] Story acceptance criteria analyzed and mapped to tests
-- [ ] Appropriate test levels selected (E2E, API, Component)
-- [ ] All tests written in Given-When-Then format
-- [ ] All tests fail initially (RED phase verified)
-- [ ] Network-first pattern applied (route interception before navigation)
-- [ ] Data factories created with faker
-- [ ] Fixtures created with auto-cleanup
-- [ ] Mock requirements documented for DEV team
-- [ ] Required data-testid attributes listed
-- [ ] Implementation checklist created with clear tasks
-- [ ] Red-green-refactor workflow documented
-- [ ] Execution commands provided
-- [ ] Output file created and formatted correctly
-Refer to `checklist.md` for comprehensive validation criteria.