@danmoisan/drm-copilot-mcp 0.0.1

package/resources/templates/policy_audit/feature-audit.yyyy-MM-ddTHH-mm.md

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+# Feature Audit: [Feature or Scope Name] ([#Issue or Scope Reference])
+
+> **Template Usage Instructions:**
+>
+> This template is for validating delivered behavior against the authoritative acceptance-criteria source files for a feature, bug, or minor-audit workflow.
+>
+> **How to use:**
+> 1. Copy this template to the target feature folder with an ISO-8601 timestamped filename: `feature-audit.yyyy-MM-ddTHH-mm.md`.
+> 2. Replace all placeholders with verified branch, evidence, requirements-source, and command details.
+> 3. Resolve the authoritative acceptance-criteria source files from `issue.md` work mode before evaluating criteria.
+> 4. Mark each criterion `PASS`, `PARTIAL`, `FAIL`, or `UNVERIFIED` based only on evidence you actually inspected.
+> 5. Preserve the acceptance-criteria wording from the source files; do not invent or rewrite criteria.
+> 6. End with an explicit overall readiness verdict and an AC status summary.
+>
+> **When to use:**
+> - Feature branch acceptance review relative to a base branch
+> - Post-remediation acceptance re-review
+> - Minor-audit acceptance validation
+> - Any repository workflow that requires `feature-audit.<timestamp>.md`
+>
+> **Delete this instruction block before finalizing the audit.**
+
+---
+
+**Audit Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
+**Feature Folder:** `[docs/features/active/or/archive/path]`
+**Base Branch:** `[branch-name]`
+**Head Branch:** `[branch-name or working-tree scope]`
+**Work Mode:** `[minor-audit / full-feature / full-bug / legacy full]`
+**Audit Type:** [Initial acceptance review / Post-remediation acceptance verification / Staged acceptance check]
+
+---
+
+## Scope and Baseline
+
+- **Base branch:** `[branch-name]` (commit `[sha]` if known)
+- **Head branch/commit:** `[branch-name or scope]` (commit `[sha]` if known)
+- **Merge base:** `[sha or N/A]`
+- **Evidence sources:**
+  - Primary: `[artifact or command output path]`
+  - Secondary baseline diff: `[artifact path]`
+  - Feature evidence: `[feature-folder/evidence/** or equivalent]`
+  - Additional evidence: `[optional additional source]`
+- **Feature folder used:** `[feature folder path]`
+- **Requirements source:** `[issue.md / spec.md / user-story.md / multiple files]`
+- **Work mode resolution note:** [Explain how work mode was determined from `issue.md`, or state that it was explicit.]
+- **Scope note:** [Document any special baseline assumptions such as working-tree-only validation, regenerated PR context, or versioned feature scope.]
+
+---
+
+## Acceptance Criteria Inventory
+
+**Instructions:** List the authoritative acceptance criteria exactly as they appear in the source files when they are checkbox-based. If the source uses prose or numbered requirements, transcribe them faithfully and note that no checkbox source exists for direct check-off.
+
+**Authoritative AC source files for this run:**
+- `[path]` — [primary / secondary / only source]
+- `[path]` — [primary / secondary / optional source]
+
+### Acceptance criteria
+
+1. [Criterion text copied or faithfully transcribed from the source file]
+2. [Criterion text copied or faithfully transcribed from the source file]
+3. [Criterion text copied or faithfully transcribed from the source file]
+
+[Add grouped subsections such as `### From user-story.md` and `### From spec.md` when multiple authoritative files are in scope.]
+
+---
+
+## Acceptance Criteria Evaluation
+
+| # | Criterion | Status | Evidence | Verification command(s) | Notes |
+|---|-----------|--------|----------|--------------------------|-------|
+| 1 | [Criterion text or abbreviated label] | [PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL / UNVERIFIED] | [Concrete file, artifact, test, or diff evidence] | `[exact command]` | [Clarifying note] |
+| 2 | [Criterion text or abbreviated label] | [PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL / UNVERIFIED] | [Concrete file, artifact, test, or diff evidence] | `[exact command]` | [Clarifying note] |
+| 3 | [Criterion text or abbreviated label] | [PASS / PARTIAL / FAIL / UNVERIFIED] | [Concrete file, artifact, test, or diff evidence] | `[exact command]` | [Clarifying note] |
+
+[Add rows as needed.]
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+**Overall Feature Readiness:** [PASS / NEEDS REVISION / BLOCKED]
+
+**Criteria summary:**
+- **PASS:** [N] criteria
+- **PARTIAL:** [N] criteria
+- **UNVERIFIED:** [N] criteria
+- **FAIL:** [N] criteria
+
+**Top gaps preventing PASS:**
+
+1. [Primary blocking or revision gap, or `None.`]
+2. [Secondary gap, or delete if not needed]
+3. [Tertiary gap, or delete if not needed]
+
+**Recommended follow-up verification steps:**
+
+1. [Concrete next verification step]
+2. [Concrete next verification step]
+
+---
+
+## Acceptance Criteria Check-Off
+
+Per the acceptance-criteria tracking rules:
+- Criteria evaluated as **PASS** may be checked off in the authoritative source file(s) if they are represented as markdown checkboxes and are not already checked.
+- Criteria evaluated as **PARTIAL**, **FAIL**, or **UNVERIFIED** must remain unchecked.
+- If the source uses prose or numbered requirements instead of checkbox items, do not rewrite the source file; record status only in this audit.
+
+### AC Status Summary
+
+- Source: `[file path(s)]`
+- Total AC items: [N]
+- Checked off (delivered): [N]
+- Remaining (unchecked): [N]
+- Items remaining: [List unchecked criterion text, or `None.`]
+
+| Source File | Total AC | Checked (PASS) | Unchecked | Notes |
+|-------------|----------|----------------|-----------|-------|
+| `[path]` | [N] | [N] | [N] | [Checkbox-backed / prose-only / not authoritative] |
+| `[path]` | [N] | [N] | [N] | [Checkbox-backed / prose-only / not authoritative] |
+
+[If no source-file checkbox change was made, state that explicitly and explain why.]