@cubis/foundry 0.3.30 → 0.3.32

package/Ai Agent Workflow/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/cursor/skills/vulnerability-scanner/SKILL.md

@@ -1,276 +0,0 @@
----
-name: vulnerability-scanner
-description: Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP 2025, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization.
-allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash
----
-
-# Vulnerability Scanner
-
-> Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.
-
-## 🔧 Runtime Scripts
-
-**Execute for automated validation:**
-
-| Script | Purpose | Usage |
-|--------|---------|-------|
-| `scripts/security_scan.py` | Validate security principles applied | `python scripts/security_scan.py <project_path>` |
-
-## 📋 Reference Files
-
-| File | Purpose |
-|------|---------|
-| [checklists.md](checklists.md) | OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists |
-
----
-
-## 1. Security Expert Mindset
-
-### Core Principles
-
-| Principle | Application |
-|-----------|-------------|
-| **Assume Breach** | Design as if attacker already inside |
-| **Zero Trust** | Never trust, always verify |
-| **Defense in Depth** | Multiple layers, no single point |
-| **Least Privilege** | Minimum required access only |
-| **Fail Secure** | On error, deny access |
-
-### Threat Modeling Questions
-
-Before scanning, ask:
-1. What are we protecting? (Assets)
-2. Who would attack? (Threat actors)
-3. How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
-4. What's the impact? (Business risk)
-
----
-
-## 2. OWASP Top 10:2025
-
-### Risk Categories
-
-| Rank | Category | Think About |
-|------|----------|-------------|
-| **A01** | Broken Access Control | Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF |
-| **A02** | Security Misconfiguration | Defaults, headers, exposed services |
-| **A03** | Software Supply Chain 🆕 | Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity |
-| **A04** | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets |
-| **A05** | Injection | User input → system commands |
-| **A06** | Insecure Design | Flawed architecture |
-| **A07** | Authentication Failures | Session, credential management |
-| **A08** | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data |
-| **A09** | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, no monitoring |
-| **A10** | Exceptional Conditions 🆕 | Error handling, fail-open states |
-
-### 2025 Key Changes
-
-```
-2021 → 2025 Shifts:
-├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
-├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
-├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
-├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
-└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms
-```
-
----
-
-## 3. Supply Chain Security (A03)
-
-### Attack Surface
-
-| Vector | Risk | Question to Ask |
-|--------|------|-----------------|
-| **Dependencies** | Malicious packages | Do we audit new deps? |
-| **Lock files** | Integrity attacks | Are they committed? |
-| **Build pipeline** | CI/CD compromise | Who can modify? |
-| **Registry** | Typosquatting | Verified sources? |
-
-### Defense Principles
-
-- Verify package integrity (checksums)
-- Pin versions, audit updates
-- Use private registries for critical deps
-- Sign and verify artifacts
-
----
-
-## 4. Attack Surface Mapping
-
-### What to Map
-
-| Category | Elements |
-|----------|----------|
-| **Entry Points** | APIs, forms, file uploads |
-| **Data Flows** | Input → Process → Output |
-| **Trust Boundaries** | Where auth/authz checked |
-| **Assets** | Secrets, PII, business data |
-
-### Prioritization Matrix
-
-```
-Risk = Likelihood × Impact
-
-High Impact + High Likelihood → CRITICAL
-High Impact + Low Likelihood  → HIGH
-Low Impact + High Likelihood  → MEDIUM
-Low Impact + Low Likelihood   → LOW
-```
-
----
-
-## 5. Risk Prioritization
-
-### CVSS + Context
-
-| Factor | Weight | Question |
-|--------|--------|----------|
-| **CVSS Score** | Base severity | How severe is the vuln? |
-| **EPSS Score** | Exploit likelihood | Is it being exploited? |
-| **Asset Value** | Business context | What's at risk? |
-| **Exposure** | Attack surface | Internet-facing? |
-
-### Prioritization Decision Tree
-
-```
-Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
-├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
-└── NO → Check CVSS
-         ├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
-         ├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
-         └── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later
-```
-
----
-
-## 6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)
-
-### Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed
-
-| Scenario | Fail-Open (BAD) | Fail-Closed (GOOD) |
-|----------|-----------------|---------------------|
-| Auth error | Allow access | Deny access |
-| Parsing fails | Accept input | Reject input |
-| Timeout | Retry forever | Limit + abort |
-
-### What to Check
-
-- Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
-- Missing error handling on security operations
-- Race conditions in auth/authz
-- Resource exhaustion scenarios
-
----
-
-## 7. Scanning Methodology
-
-### Phase-Based Approach
-
-```
-1. RECONNAISSANCE
-   └── Understand the target
-       ├── Technology stack
-       ├── Entry points
-       └── Data flows
-
-2. DISCOVERY
-   └── Identify potential issues
-       ├── Configuration review
-       ├── Dependency analysis
-       └── Code pattern search
-
-3. ANALYSIS
-   └── Validate and prioritize
-       ├── False positive elimination
-       ├── Risk scoring
-       └── Attack chain mapping
-
-4. REPORTING
-   └── Actionable findings
-       ├── Clear reproduction steps
-       ├── Business impact
-       └── Remediation guidance
-```
-
----
-
-## 8. Code Pattern Analysis
-
-### High-Risk Patterns
-
-| Pattern | Risk | Look For |
-|---------|------|----------|
-| **String concat in queries** | Injection | `"SELECT * FROM " + user_input` |
-| **Dynamic code execution** | RCE | `eval()`, `exec()`, `Function()` |
-| **Unsafe deserialization** | RCE | `pickle.loads()`, `unserialize()` |
-| **Path manipulation** | Traversal | User input in file paths |
-| **Disabled security** | Various | `verify=False`, `--insecure` |
-
-### Secret Patterns
-
-| Type | Indicators |
-|------|-----------|
-| API Keys | `api_key`, `apikey`, high entropy |
-| Tokens | `token`, `bearer`, `jwt` |
-| Credentials | `password`, `secret`, `key` |
-| Cloud | `AWS_`, `AZURE_`, `GCP_` prefixes |
-
----
-
-## 9. Cloud Security Considerations
-
-### Shared Responsibility
-
-| Layer | You Own | Provider Owns |
-|-------|---------|---------------|
-| Data | ✅ | ❌ |
-| Application | ✅ | ❌ |
-| OS/Runtime | Depends | Depends |
-| Infrastructure | ❌ | ✅ |
-
-### Cloud-Specific Checks
-
-- IAM: Least privilege applied?
-- Storage: Public buckets?
-- Network: Security groups tightened?
-- Secrets: Using secrets manager?
-
----
-
-## 10. Anti-Patterns
-
-| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
-|----------|-------|
-| Scan without understanding | Map attack surface first |
-| Alert on every CVE | Prioritize by exploitability + asset |
-| Ignore false positives | Maintain verified baseline |
-| Fix symptoms only | Address root causes |
-| Scan once before deploy | Continuous scanning |
-| Trust third-party deps blindly | Verify integrity, audit code |
-
----
-
-## 11. Reporting Principles
-
-### Finding Structure
-
-Each finding should answer:
-1. **What?** - Clear vulnerability description
-2. **Where?** - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
-3. **Why?** - Root cause explanation
-4. **Impact?** - Business consequence
-5. **How to fix?** - Specific remediation
-
-### Severity Classification
-
-| Severity | Criteria |
-|----------|----------|
-| **Critical** | RCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure |
-| **High** | Data exposure, privilege escalation |
-| **Medium** | Limited scope, requires conditions |
-| **Low** | Informational, best practice |
-
----
-
-> **Remember:** Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"

package/Ai Agent Workflow/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/windsurf/skills/architecture/SKILL.md

@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
----
-name: architecture
-description: Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
-allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
----
-
-# Architecture Decision Framework
-
-> "Requirements drive architecture. Trade-offs inform decisions. ADRs capture rationale."
-
-## 🎯 Selective Reading Rule
-
-**Read ONLY files relevant to the request!** Check the content map, find what you need.
-
-| File | Description | When to Read |
-|------|-------------|--------------|
-| `context-discovery.md` | Questions to ask, project classification | Starting architecture design |
-| `trade-off-analysis.md` | ADR templates, trade-off framework | Documenting decisions |
-| `pattern-selection.md` | Decision trees, anti-patterns | Choosing patterns |
-| `examples.md` | MVP, SaaS, Enterprise examples | Reference implementations |
-| `patterns-reference.md` | Quick lookup for patterns | Pattern comparison |
-
----
-
-## 🔗 Related Skills
-
-| Skill | Use For |
-|-------|---------|
-| `@[skills/database-design]` | Database schema design |
-| `@[skills/api-patterns]` | API design patterns |
-| `@[skills/deployment-procedures]` | Deployment architecture |
-
----
-
-## Core Principle
-
-**"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."**
-
-- Start simple
-- Add complexity ONLY when proven necessary
-- You can always add patterns later
-- Removing complexity is MUCH harder than adding it
-
----
-
-## Validation Checklist
-
-Before finalizing architecture:
-
-- [ ] Requirements clearly understood
-- [ ] Constraints identified
-- [ ] Each decision has trade-off analysis
-- [ ] Simpler alternatives considered
-- [ ] ADRs written for significant decisions
-- [ ] Team expertise matches chosen patterns

package/Ai Agent Workflow/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/windsurf/skills/code-review-checklist/SKILL.md

@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
----
-name: code-review-checklist
-description: Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.
-allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep
----
-
-# Code Review Checklist
-
-## Quick Review Checklist
-
-### Correctness
-- [ ] Code does what it's supposed to do
-- [ ] Edge cases handled
-- [ ] Error handling in place
-- [ ] No obvious bugs
-
-### Security
-- [ ] Input validated and sanitized
-- [ ] No SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
-- [ ] No XSS or CSRF vulnerabilities
-- [ ] No hardcoded secrets or sensitive credentials
-- [ ] **AI-Specific:** Protection against Prompt Injection (if applicable)
-- [ ] **AI-Specific:** Outputs are sanitized before being used in critical sinks
-
-### Performance
-- [ ] No N+1 queries
-- [ ] No unnecessary loops
-- [ ] Appropriate caching
-- [ ] Bundle size impact considered
-
-### Code Quality
-- [ ] Clear naming
-- [ ] DRY - no duplicate code
-- [ ] SOLID principles followed
-- [ ] Appropriate abstraction level
-
-### Testing
-- [ ] Unit tests for new code
-- [ ] Edge cases tested
-- [ ] Tests readable and maintainable
-
-### Documentation
-- [ ] Complex logic commented
-- [ ] Public APIs documented
-- [ ] README updated if needed
-
-## AI & LLM Review Patterns (2025)
-
-### Logic & Hallucinations
-- [ ] **Chain of Thought:** Does the logic follow a verifiable path?
-- [ ] **Edge Cases:** Did the AI account for empty states, timeouts, and partial failures?
-- [ ] **External State:** Is the code making safe assumptions about file systems or networks?
-
-### Prompt Engineering Review
-```markdown
-// ❌ Vague prompt in code
-const response = await ai.generate(userInput);
-
-// ✅ Structured & Safe prompt
-const response = await ai.generate({
-  system: "You are a specialized parser...",
-  input: sanitize(userInput),
-  schema: ResponseSchema
-});
-```
-
-## Anti-Patterns to Flag
-
-```typescript
-// ❌ Magic numbers
-if (status === 3) { ... }
-
-// ✅ Named constants
-if (status === Status.ACTIVE) { ... }
-
-// ❌ Deep nesting
-if (a) { if (b) { if (c) { ... } } }
-
-// ✅ Early returns
-if (!a) return;
-if (!b) return;
-if (!c) return;
-// do work
-
-// ❌ Long functions (100+ lines)
-// ✅ Small, focused functions
-
-// ❌ any type
-const data: any = ...
-
-// ✅ Proper types
-const data: UserData = ...
-```
-
-## Review Comments Guide
-
-```
-// Blocking issues use 🔴
-🔴 BLOCKING: SQL injection vulnerability here
-
-// Important suggestions use 🟡
-🟡 SUGGESTION: Consider using useMemo for performance
-
-// Minor nits use 🟢
-🟢 NIT: Prefer const over let for immutable variable
-
-// Questions use ❓
-❓ QUESTION: What happens if user is null here?
-```

package/Ai Agent Workflow/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/windsurf/skills/debugging-wizard/SKILL.md

@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
----
-name: "debugging-wizard"
-description: "Use when investigating errors, analyzing stack traces, or finding root causes of unexpected behavior. Invoke for error investigation, troubleshooting, log analysis, root cause analysis."
----
-
-
-# Debugging Wizard
-
-## Overview
-
-Expert debugger applying systematic methodology to isolate and resolve issues in any codebase.
-
-## Role Definition
-
-You are a senior engineer with 15+ years debugging experience across multiple languages and frameworks. You apply scientific methodology to isolate root causes efficiently. You never guess - you test hypotheses systematically.
-
-## When to Use This Skill
-
-- Investigating errors, exceptions, or unexpected behavior
-- Analyzing stack traces and error messages
-- Finding root causes of intermittent issues
-- Performance debugging and profiling
-- Memory leak investigation
-- Race condition diagnosis
-
-## Core Workflow
-
-1. **Reproduce** - Establish consistent reproduction steps
-2. **Isolate** - Narrow down to smallest failing case
-3. **Hypothesize** - Form testable theories about cause
-4. **Test** - Verify/disprove each hypothesis
-5. **Fix** - Implement and verify solution
-6. **Prevent** - Add tests/safeguards against regression
-
-## Available Steering Files
-
-Load detailed guidance on-demand:
-
-| Topic           | Reference                     | Load When                              |
-| --------------- | ----------------------------- | -------------------------------------- |
-| Debugging Tools | `references/debugging-tools.md` | Setting up debuggers by language       |
-| Common Patterns | `references/common-patterns.md` | Recognizing bug patterns               |
-| Strategies      | `references/strategies.md`      | Binary search, git bisect, time travel |
-| Quick Fixes     | `references/quick-fixes.md`     | Common error solutions                 |
-
-<!-- Row below adapted from obra/superpowers by Jesse Vincent (@obra), MIT License -->
-
-| Systematic Debugging | `references/systematic-debugging.md` | Complex bugs, multiple failed fixes, root cause analysis |
-
-## Constraints
-
-### MUST DO
-
-- Reproduce the issue first
-- Gather complete error messages and stack traces
-- Test one hypothesis at a time
-- Document findings for future reference
-- Add regression tests after fixing
-- Remove all debug code before committing
-
-### MUST NOT DO
-
-- Guess without testing
-- Make multiple changes at once
-- Skip reproduction steps
-- Assume you know the cause
-- Debug in production without safeguards
-- Leave console.log/debugger statements in code
-
-## Output Templates
-
-When debugging, provide:
-
-1. **Root Cause**: What specifically caused the issue
-2. **Evidence**: Stack trace, logs, or test that proves it
-3. **Fix**: Code change that resolves it
-4. **Prevention**: Test or safeguard to prevent recurrence
-
-## Knowledge Reference
-
-Debuggers (Chrome DevTools, VS Code, pdb, delve), profilers, log aggregation, distributed tracing, memory analysis, git bisect, error tracking (Sentry)
-
-## Related Powers
-
-- **Test Master** - Writing regression tests
-- **Fullstack Guardian** - Implementing fixes
-- **Monitoring Expert** - Setting up alerting