@cregis-dev/cckit 0.2.0

package/templates/ecc/skills/swift-protocol-di-testing/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+---
+name: swift-protocol-di-testing
+description: Protocol-based dependency injection for testable Swift code — mock file system, network, and external APIs using focused protocols and Swift Testing.
+---
+
+# Swift Protocol-Based Dependency Injection for Testing
+
+Patterns for making Swift code testable by abstracting external dependencies (file system, network, iCloud) behind small, focused protocols. Enables deterministic tests without I/O.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- Writing Swift code that accesses file system, network, or external APIs
+- Need to test error handling paths without triggering real failures
+- Building modules that work across environments (app, test, SwiftUI preview)
+- Designing testable architecture with Swift concurrency (actors, Sendable)
+
+## Core Pattern
+
+### 1. Define Small, Focused Protocols
+
+Each protocol handles exactly one external concern.
+
+```swift
+// File system access
+public protocol FileSystemProviding: Sendable {
+    func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL?
+}
+
+// File read/write operations
+public protocol FileAccessorProviding: Sendable {
+    func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data
+    func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws
+    func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool
+}
+
+// Bookmark storage (e.g., for sandboxed apps)
+public protocol BookmarkStorageProviding: Sendable {
+    func saveBookmark(_ data: Data, for key: String) throws
+    func loadBookmark(for key: String) throws -> Data?
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Create Default (Production) Implementations
+
+```swift
+public struct DefaultFileSystemProvider: FileSystemProviding {
+    public init() {}
+
+    public func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL? {
+        FileManager.default.url(forUbiquityContainerIdentifier: nil)
+    }
+}
+
+public struct DefaultFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding {
+    public init() {}
+
+    public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
+        try Data(contentsOf: url)
+    }
+
+    public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
+        try data.write(to: url, options: .atomic)
+    }
+
+    public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
+        FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: url.path)
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### 3. Create Mock Implementations for Testing
+
+```swift
+public final class MockFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding, @unchecked Sendable {
+    public var files: [URL: Data] = [:]
+    public var readError: Error?
+    public var writeError: Error?
+
+    public init() {}
+
+    public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
+        if let error = readError { throw error }
+        guard let data = files[url] else {
+            throw CocoaError(.fileReadNoSuchFile)
+        }
+        return data
+    }
+
+    public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
+        if let error = writeError { throw error }
+        files[url] = data
+    }
+
+    public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
+        files[url] != nil
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### 4. Inject Dependencies with Default Parameters
+
+Production code uses defaults; tests inject mocks.
+
+```swift
+public actor SyncManager {
+    private let fileSystem: FileSystemProviding
+    private let fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding
+
+    public init(
+        fileSystem: FileSystemProviding = DefaultFileSystemProvider(),
+        fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding = DefaultFileAccessor()
+    ) {
+        self.fileSystem = fileSystem
+        self.fileAccessor = fileAccessor
+    }
+
+    public func sync() async throws {
+        guard let containerURL = fileSystem.containerURL(for: .sync) else {
+            throw SyncError.containerNotAvailable
+        }
+        let data = try fileAccessor.read(
+            from: containerURL.appendingPathComponent("data.json")
+        )
+        // Process data...
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### 5. Write Tests with Swift Testing
+
+```swift
+import Testing
+
+@Test("Sync manager handles missing container")
+func testMissingContainer() async {
+    let mockFileSystem = MockFileSystemProvider(containerURL: nil)
+    let manager = SyncManager(fileSystem: mockFileSystem)
+
+    await #expect(throws: SyncError.containerNotAvailable) {
+        try await manager.sync()
+    }
+}
+
+@Test("Sync manager reads data correctly")
+func testReadData() async throws {
+    let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
+    mockFileAccessor.files[testURL] = testData
+
+    let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
+    let result = try await manager.loadData()
+
+    #expect(result == expectedData)
+}
+
+@Test("Sync manager handles read errors gracefully")
+func testReadError() async {
+    let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
+    mockFileAccessor.readError = CocoaError(.fileReadCorruptFile)
+
+    let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
+
+    await #expect(throws: SyncError.self) {
+        try await manager.sync()
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+- **Single Responsibility**: Each protocol should handle one concern — don't create "god protocols" with many methods
+- **Sendable conformance**: Required when protocols are used across actor boundaries
+- **Default parameters**: Let production code use real implementations by default; only tests need to specify mocks
+- **Error simulation**: Design mocks with configurable error properties for testing failure paths
+- **Only mock boundaries**: Mock external dependencies (file system, network, APIs), not internal types
+
+## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+- Creating a single large protocol that covers all external access
+- Mocking internal types that have no external dependencies
+- Using `#if DEBUG` conditionals instead of proper dependency injection
+- Forgetting `Sendable` conformance when used with actors
+- Over-engineering: if a type has no external dependencies, it doesn't need a protocol
+
+## When to Use
+
+- Any Swift code that touches file system, network, or external APIs
+- Testing error handling paths that are hard to trigger in real environments
+- Building modules that need to work in app, test, and SwiftUI preview contexts
+- Apps using Swift concurrency (actors, structured concurrency) that need testable architecture

package/templates/ecc/skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
+---
+name: tdd-workflow
+description: Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
+---
+
+# Test-Driven Development Workflow
+
+This skill ensures all code development follows TDD principles with comprehensive test coverage.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- Writing new features or functionality
+- Fixing bugs or issues
+- Refactoring existing code
+- Adding API endpoints
+- Creating new components
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### 1. Tests BEFORE Code
+ALWAYS write tests first, then implement code to make tests pass.
+
+### 2. Coverage Requirements
+- Minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
+- All edge cases covered
+- Error scenarios tested
+- Boundary conditions verified
+
+### 3. Test Types
+
+#### Unit Tests
+- Individual functions and utilities
+- Component logic
+- Pure functions
+- Helpers and utilities
+
+#### Integration Tests
+- API endpoints
+- Database operations
+- Service interactions
+- External API calls
+
+#### E2E Tests (Playwright)
+- Critical user flows
+- Complete workflows
+- Browser automation
+- UI interactions
+
+## TDD Workflow Steps
+
+### Step 1: Write User Journeys
+```
+As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
+
+Example:
+As a user, I want to search for markets semantically,
+so that I can find relevant markets even without exact keywords.
+```
+
+### Step 2: Generate Test Cases
+For each user journey, create comprehensive test cases:
+
+```typescript
+describe('Semantic Search', () => {
+  it('returns relevant markets for query', async () => {
+    // Test implementation
+  })
+
+  it('handles empty query gracefully', async () => {
+    // Test edge case
+  })
+
+  it('falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable', async () => {
+    // Test fallback behavior
+  })
+
+  it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
+    // Test sorting logic
+  })
+})
+```
+
+### Step 3: Run Tests (They Should Fail)
+```bash
+npm test
+# Tests should fail - we haven't implemented yet
+```
+
+### Step 4: Implement Code
+Write minimal code to make tests pass:
+
+```typescript
+// Implementation guided by tests
+export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
+  // Implementation here
+}
+```
+
+### Step 5: Run Tests Again
+```bash
+npm test
+# Tests should now pass
+```
+
+### Step 6: Refactor
+Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
+- Remove duplication
+- Improve naming
+- Optimize performance
+- Enhance readability
+
+### Step 7: Verify Coverage
+```bash
+npm run test:coverage
+# Verify 80%+ coverage achieved
+```
+
+## Testing Patterns
+
+### Unit Test Pattern (Jest/Vitest)
+```typescript
+import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
+import { Button } from './Button'
+
+describe('Button Component', () => {
+  it('renders with correct text', () => {
+    render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
+    expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
+  })
+
+  it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
+    const handleClick = jest.fn()
+    render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
+
+    fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
+
+    expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
+  })
+
+  it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
+    render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
+    expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
+  })
+})
+```
+
+### API Integration Test Pattern
+```typescript
+import { NextRequest } from 'next/server'
+import { GET } from './route'
+
+describe('GET /api/markets', () => {
+  it('returns markets successfully', async () => {
+    const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
+    const response = await GET(request)
+    const data = await response.json()
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(200)
+    expect(data.success).toBe(true)
+    expect(Array.isArray(data.data)).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('validates query parameters', async () => {
+    const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets?limit=invalid')
+    const response = await GET(request)
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(400)
+  })
+
+  it('handles database errors gracefully', async () => {
+    // Mock database failure
+    const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
+    // Test error handling
+  })
+})
+```
+
+### E2E Test Pattern (Playwright)
+```typescript
+import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
+
+test('user can search and filter markets', async ({ page }) => {
+  // Navigate to markets page
+  await page.goto('/')
+  await page.click('a[href="/markets"]')
+
+  // Verify page loaded
+  await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Markets')
+
+  // Search for markets
+  await page.fill('input[placeholder="Search markets"]', 'election')
+
+  // Wait for debounce and results
+  await page.waitForTimeout(600)
+
+  // Verify search results displayed
+  const results = page.locator('[data-testid="market-card"]')
+  await expect(results).toHaveCount(5, { timeout: 5000 })
+
+  // Verify results contain search term
+  const firstResult = results.first()
+  await expect(firstResult).toContainText('election', { ignoreCase: true })
+
+  // Filter by status
+  await page.click('button:has-text("Active")')
+
+  // Verify filtered results
+  await expect(results).toHaveCount(3)
+})
+
+test('user can create a new market', async ({ page }) => {
+  // Login first
+  await page.goto('/creator-dashboard')
+
+  // Fill market creation form
+  await page.fill('input[name="name"]', 'Test Market')
+  await page.fill('textarea[name="description"]', 'Test description')
+  await page.fill('input[name="endDate"]', '2025-12-31')
+
+  // Submit form
+  await page.click('button[type="submit"]')
+
+  // Verify success message
+  await expect(page.locator('text=Market created successfully')).toBeVisible()
+
+  // Verify redirect to market page
+  await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/markets\/test-market/)
+})
+```
+
+## Test File Organization
+
+```
+src/
+├── components/
+│   ├── Button/
+│   │   ├── Button.tsx
+│   │   ├── Button.test.tsx          # Unit tests
+│   │   └── Button.stories.tsx       # Storybook
+│   └── MarketCard/
+│       ├── MarketCard.tsx
+│       └── MarketCard.test.tsx
+├── app/
+│   └── api/
+│       └── markets/
+│           ├── route.ts
+│           └── route.test.ts         # Integration tests
+└── e2e/
+    ├── markets.spec.ts               # E2E tests
+    ├── trading.spec.ts
+    └── auth.spec.ts
+```
+
+## Mocking External Services
+
+### Supabase Mock
+```typescript
+jest.mock('@/lib/supabase', () => ({
+  supabase: {
+    from: jest.fn(() => ({
+      select: jest.fn(() => ({
+        eq: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({
+          data: [{ id: 1, name: 'Test Market' }],
+          error: null
+        }))
+      }))
+    }))
+  }
+}))
+```
+
+### Redis Mock
+```typescript
+jest.mock('@/lib/redis', () => ({
+  searchMarketsByVector: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve([
+    { slug: 'test-market', similarity_score: 0.95 }
+  ])),
+  checkRedisHealth: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ connected: true }))
+}))
+```
+
+### OpenAI Mock
+```typescript
+jest.mock('@/lib/openai', () => ({
+  generateEmbedding: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve(
+    new Array(1536).fill(0.1) // Mock 1536-dim embedding
+  ))
+}))
+```
+
+## Test Coverage Verification
+
+### Run Coverage Report
+```bash
+npm run test:coverage
+```
+
+### Coverage Thresholds
+```json
+{
+  "jest": {
+    "coverageThresholds": {
+      "global": {
+        "branches": 80,
+        "functions": 80,
+        "lines": 80,
+        "statements": 80
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Common Testing Mistakes to Avoid
+
+### ❌ WRONG: Testing Implementation Details
+```typescript
+// Don't test internal state
+expect(component.state.count).toBe(5)
+```
+
+### ✅ CORRECT: Test User-Visible Behavior
+```typescript
+// Test what users see
+expect(screen.getByText('Count: 5')).toBeInTheDocument()
+```
+
+### ❌ WRONG: Brittle Selectors
+```typescript
+// Breaks easily
+await page.click('.css-class-xyz')
+```
+
+### ✅ CORRECT: Semantic Selectors
+```typescript
+// Resilient to changes
+await page.click('button:has-text("Submit")')
+await page.click('[data-testid="submit-button"]')
+```
+
+### ❌ WRONG: No Test Isolation
+```typescript
+// Tests depend on each other
+test('creates user', () => { /* ... */ })
+test('updates same user', () => { /* depends on previous test */ })
+```
+
+### ✅ CORRECT: Independent Tests
+```typescript
+// Each test sets up its own data
+test('creates user', () => {
+  const user = createTestUser()
+  // Test logic
+})
+
+test('updates user', () => {
+  const user = createTestUser()
+  // Update logic
+})
+```
+
+## Continuous Testing
+
+### Watch Mode During Development
+```bash
+npm test -- --watch
+# Tests run automatically on file changes
+```
+
+### Pre-Commit Hook
+```bash
+# Runs before every commit
+npm test && npm run lint
+```
+
+### CI/CD Integration
+```yaml
+# GitHub Actions
+- name: Run Tests
+  run: npm test -- --coverage
+- name: Upload Coverage
+  uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Write Tests First** - Always TDD
+2. **One Assert Per Test** - Focus on single behavior
+3. **Descriptive Test Names** - Explain what's tested
+4. **Arrange-Act-Assert** - Clear test structure
+5. **Mock External Dependencies** - Isolate unit tests
+6. **Test Edge Cases** - Null, undefined, empty, large
+7. **Test Error Paths** - Not just happy paths
+8. **Keep Tests Fast** - Unit tests < 50ms each
+9. **Clean Up After Tests** - No side effects
+10. **Review Coverage Reports** - Identify gaps
+
+## Success Metrics
+
+- 80%+ code coverage achieved
+- All tests passing (green)
+- No skipped or disabled tests
+- Fast test execution (< 30s for unit tests)
+- E2E tests cover critical user flows
+- Tests catch bugs before production
+
+---
+
+**Remember**: Tests are not optional. They are the safety net that enables confident refactoring, rapid development, and production reliability.

package/templates/ecc/skills/verification-loop/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+---
+name: verification-loop
+description: "A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions."
+---
+
+# Verification Loop Skill
+
+A comprehensive verification system for Claude Code sessions.
+
+## When to Use
+
+Invoke this skill:
+- After completing a feature or significant code change
+- Before creating a PR
+- When you want to ensure quality gates pass
+- After refactoring
+
+## Verification Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Build Verification
+```bash
+# Check if project builds
+npm run build 2>&1 | tail -20
+# OR
+pnpm build 2>&1 | tail -20
+```
+
+If build fails, STOP and fix before continuing.
+
+### Phase 2: Type Check
+```bash
+# TypeScript projects
+npx tsc --noEmit 2>&1 | head -30
+
+# Python projects
+pyright . 2>&1 | head -30
+```
+
+Report all type errors. Fix critical ones before continuing.
+
+### Phase 3: Lint Check
+```bash
+# JavaScript/TypeScript
+npm run lint 2>&1 | head -30
+
+# Python
+ruff check . 2>&1 | head -30
+```
+
+### Phase 4: Test Suite
+```bash
+# Run tests with coverage
+npm run test -- --coverage 2>&1 | tail -50
+
+# Check coverage threshold
+# Target: 80% minimum
+```
+
+Report:
+- Total tests: X
+- Passed: X
+- Failed: X
+- Coverage: X%
+
+### Phase 5: Security Scan
+```bash
+# Check for secrets
+grep -rn "sk-" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
+grep -rn "api_key" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
+
+# Check for console.log
+grep -rn "console.log" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
+```
+
+### Phase 6: Diff Review
+```bash
+# Show what changed
+git diff --stat
+git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
+```
+
+Review each changed file for:
+- Unintended changes
+- Missing error handling
+- Potential edge cases
+
+## Output Format
+
+After running all phases, produce a verification report:
+
+```
+VERIFICATION REPORT
+==================
+
+Build:     [PASS/FAIL]
+Types:     [PASS/FAIL] (X errors)
+Lint:      [PASS/FAIL] (X warnings)
+Tests:     [PASS/FAIL] (X/Y passed, Z% coverage)
+Security:  [PASS/FAIL] (X issues)
+Diff:      [X files changed]
+
+Overall:   [READY/NOT READY] for PR
+
+Issues to Fix:
+1. ...
+2. ...
+```
+
+## Continuous Mode
+
+For long sessions, run verification every 15 minutes or after major changes:
+
+```markdown
+Set a mental checkpoint:
+- After completing each function
+- After finishing a component
+- Before moving to next task
+
+Run: /verify
+```
+
+## Integration with Hooks
+
+This skill complements PostToolUse hooks but provides deeper verification.
+Hooks catch issues immediately; this skill provides comprehensive review.