@codeyam/codeyam-cli 0.1.0-staging.596f0eb → 0.1.0-staging.6e699e5

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/isolateScopes.ts

@@ -119,6 +119,16 @@ function processScope({
   }
   const childScopesRanges: ChildRange[] = [];
 
+  // Extract gating conditions BEFORE any JSX is extracted into child scopes
+  // This ensures we capture conditions like {cond && <ChildComponent />}
+  // before the JSX is replaced with placeholders.
+  // Only extract when maxJSXLimit > 0 (i.e., when JSX will actually be extracted).
+  const extractedGatingConditions: ScopeInfo['extractedGatingConditions'] = {};
+
+  if (maxJSXLimit > 0) {
+    extractGatingConditionsFromJsx(node, sourceFile, extractedGatingConditions);
+  }
+
   const addChildScopesRange = ({
     start,
     end,
@@ -726,6 +736,10 @@ function processScope({
     text: modifiedText,
     variables: Array.from(variables),
     childScopes,
+    // Include gating conditions if any were found
+    ...(Object.keys(extractedGatingConditions).length > 0 && {
+      extractedGatingConditions,
+    }),
   };
 }
 
@@ -772,7 +786,11 @@ export default function isolateScopes(
   // }
   // logChildIds(isolatedScopes);
 
-  processJSXForScope(isolatedScopes, generateSyntheticName);
+  // Process JSX for the root scope only (not child scopes)
+  // Child scopes contain callback functions that should preserve their JSX
+  // for analysis - gating conditions are now detected in processScope BEFORE extraction
+  const jsxLimit = options?.jsxLimit ?? 10;
+  processJSXForScope(isolatedScopes, generateSyntheticName, jsxLimit);
 
   // If the root scope text is empty and there's only one child scope,
   // return that child scope as the root scope
@@ -800,9 +818,224 @@ export default function isolateScopes(
  * Any errors during parsing are caught and logged, ensuring robust handling
  * of invalid or unexpected input.
  */
+/**
+ * Helper to get the component name from a JSX element (returns null for intrinsic elements like 'div')
+ */
+function getJsxComponentName(
+  node: ts.JsxElement | ts.JsxSelfClosingElement,
+  sourceFile: ts.SourceFile,
+): string | null {
+  let tagName: string;
+  if (ts.isJsxElement(node)) {
+    tagName = node.openingElement.tagName.getText(sourceFile);
+  } else {
+    tagName = node.tagName.getText(sourceFile);
+  }
+  // Intrinsic elements start with lowercase
+  if (tagName[0] === tagName[0].toLowerCase()) {
+    return null;
+  }
+  return tagName;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Helper to extract a simple path string from an expression (for gating conditions)
+ */
+function getSimplePathFromExpression(
+  expr: ts.Expression,
+  sourceFile: ts.SourceFile,
+): string | null {
+  // Unwrap parentheses
+  while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(expr)) {
+    expr = expr.expression;
+  }
+
+  if (ts.isIdentifier(expr)) {
+    return expr.text;
+  }
+  if (ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(expr)) {
+    const base = getSimplePathFromExpression(expr.expression, sourceFile);
+    if (base) {
+      return `${base}.${expr.name.text}`;
+    }
+  }
+  if (ts.isBinaryExpression(expr)) {
+    // For comparisons like `x === 'value'`, return the left side path
+    if (
+      expr.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.EqualsEqualsEqualsToken ||
+      expr.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.ExclamationEqualsEqualsToken
+    ) {
+      return getSimplePathFromExpression(expr.left, sourceFile);
+    }
+    // For && chains, try to get a path from either side
+    if (expr.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.AmpersandAmpersandToken) {
+      return (
+        getSimplePathFromExpression(expr.left, sourceFile) ||
+        getSimplePathFromExpression(expr.right, sourceFile)
+      );
+    }
+  }
+  return null;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Extracts gating conditions from JSX before it's extracted into child scopes.
+ * This detects patterns like:
+ * - {condition && <Component />}
+ * - {condition ? <ComponentA /> : <ComponentB />}
+ * - {a ? <A/> : b ? <B/> : <C/>} (chained ternaries)
+ */
+function extractGatingConditionsFromJsx(
+  node: ts.Node,
+  sourceFile: ts.SourceFile,
+  gatingConditions: ScopeInfo['extractedGatingConditions'],
+): void {
+  // Process JSX expression children like {condition && <Component />}
+  const processJsxExpression = (expr: ts.Expression): void => {
+    // Unwrap parentheses
+    while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(expr)) {
+      expr = expr.expression;
+    }
+
+    // Handle && chains: {condition && <Component />}
+    if (
+      ts.isBinaryExpression(expr) &&
+      expr.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.AmpersandAmpersandToken
+    ) {
+      // The right side might be JSX or another && expression
+      let rightExpr = expr.right;
+      while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(rightExpr)) {
+        rightExpr = rightExpr.expression;
+      }
+
+      if (ts.isJsxElement(rightExpr) || ts.isJsxSelfClosingElement(rightExpr)) {
+        const componentName = getJsxComponentName(rightExpr, sourceFile);
+        if (componentName) {
+          // Extract all conditions from the && chain
+          const extractConditions = (e: ts.Expression): string[] => {
+            while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(e)) {
+              e = e.expression;
+            }
+            if (
+              ts.isBinaryExpression(e) &&
+              e.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.AmpersandAmpersandToken
+            ) {
+              // Check if right side is JSX (terminal) or more conditions
+              let right = e.right;
+              while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(right)) {
+                right = right.expression;
+              }
+              if (ts.isJsxElement(right) || ts.isJsxSelfClosingElement(right)) {
+                // Right is JSX, so left contains all conditions
+                return extractConditions(e.left);
+              }
+              // Both sides are conditions
+              return [
+                ...extractConditions(e.left),
+                ...extractConditions(e.right),
+              ];
+            }
+            const path = getSimplePathFromExpression(e, sourceFile);
+            return path ? [path] : [];
+          };
+
+          const conditions = extractConditions(expr.left);
+          if (!gatingConditions![componentName]) {
+            gatingConditions![componentName] = [];
+          }
+          for (const path of conditions) {
+            gatingConditions![componentName].push({
+              path,
+              conditionType: 'truthiness',
+              location: 'logical-and',
+            });
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
+    // Handle ternaries: {condition ? <A /> : <B />}
+    if (ts.isConditionalExpression(expr)) {
+      processConditionalExpression(expr, sourceFile, gatingConditions, false);
+    }
+  };
+
+  // Recursive function to handle chained ternaries
+  const processConditionalExpression = (
+    expr: ts.ConditionalExpression,
+    sf: ts.SourceFile,
+    gc: ScopeInfo['extractedGatingConditions'],
+    parentConditionNegated: boolean,
+  ): void => {
+    const conditionPath = getSimplePathFromExpression(expr.condition, sf);
+
+    // Process whenTrue branch
+    let whenTrue = expr.whenTrue;
+    while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(whenTrue)) {
+      whenTrue = whenTrue.expression;
+    }
+    if (ts.isJsxElement(whenTrue) || ts.isJsxSelfClosingElement(whenTrue)) {
+      const componentName = getJsxComponentName(whenTrue, sf);
+      if (componentName && conditionPath) {
+        if (!gc![componentName]) {
+          gc![componentName] = [];
+        }
+        gc![componentName].push({
+          path: conditionPath,
+          conditionType: 'truthiness',
+          location: 'ternary',
+          isNegated: false,
+        });
+      }
+    }
+
+    // Process whenFalse branch
+    let whenFalse = expr.whenFalse;
+    while (ts.isParenthesizedExpression(whenFalse)) {
+      whenFalse = whenFalse.expression;
+    }
+
+    if (ts.isJsxElement(whenFalse) || ts.isJsxSelfClosingElement(whenFalse)) {
+      const componentName = getJsxComponentName(whenFalse, sf);
+      if (componentName && conditionPath) {
+        if (!gc![componentName]) {
+          gc![componentName] = [];
+        }
+        gc![componentName].push({
+          path: conditionPath,
+          conditionType: 'truthiness',
+          location: 'ternary',
+          isNegated: true, // else branch = negated condition
+        });
+      }
+    } else if (ts.isConditionalExpression(whenFalse)) {
+      // Chained ternary: a ? <A/> : b ? <B/> : <C/>
+      // Recursively process the nested ternary
+      processConditionalExpression(whenFalse, sf, gc, true);
+    }
+  };
+
+  // Traverse JSX children to find expressions
+  let jsxExpressionCount = 0;
+  let ternaryCount = 0;
+  const traverseJsx = (n: ts.Node): void => {
+    if (ts.isJsxExpression(n) && n.expression) {
+      jsxExpressionCount++;
+      if (ts.isConditionalExpression(n.expression)) {
+        ternaryCount++;
+      }
+      processJsxExpression(n.expression);
+    }
+    ts.forEachChild(n, traverseJsx);
+  };
+
+  traverseJsx(node);
+}
+
 function processJSXForScope(
   scope: ScopeInfo,
   generateSyntheticName: () => string,
+  jsxLimit: number = 10,
 ) {
   // Parse the scope text as a TypeScript AST to find JSX elements
   const scopeText = scope.text;
@@ -818,6 +1051,34 @@ function processJSXForScope(
       ts.ScriptKind.TSX,
     );
 
+    // Extract gating conditions BEFORE extraction (while JSX is still complete)
+    const gatingConditions: ScopeInfo['extractedGatingConditions'] = {};
+
+    extractGatingConditionsFromJsx(
+      tempSourceFile,
+      tempSourceFile,
+      gatingConditions,
+    );
+
+    // Merge with any existing gating conditions from processScope
+    // (processScope extracts from original text, this extracts from modified text)
+    if (Object.keys(gatingConditions).length > 0) {
+      if (scope.extractedGatingConditions) {
+        for (const [componentName, conditions] of Object.entries(
+          gatingConditions,
+        )) {
+          if (scope.extractedGatingConditions[componentName]) {
+            // Merge conditions, avoiding duplicates
+            scope.extractedGatingConditions[componentName].push(...conditions);
+          } else {
+            scope.extractedGatingConditions[componentName] = conditions;
+          }
+        }
+      } else {
+        scope.extractedGatingConditions = gatingConditions;
+      }
+    }
+
     const nodeMap = new Map<ts.Node, string>();
 
     // Find all JSX elements in this scope without recursing into child scopes
@@ -841,6 +1102,7 @@ function processJSXForScope(
       end: number;
       id: string;
       code: string;
+      jsxTagName?: string;
     }> = [];
 
     for (const [node, id] of nodeMap.entries()) {
@@ -848,13 +1110,23 @@ function processJSXForScope(
       const nodeEnd = node.getEnd();
       const code = node.getText(tempSourceFile);
 
-      // Only process reasonably sized JSX elements
-      if (code.length > 10) {
+      // Extract the JSX tag name
+      let jsxTagName: string | undefined;
+      if (ts.isJsxElement(node)) {
+        const tagNameNode = node.openingElement.tagName;
+        jsxTagName = tagNameNode.getText(tempSourceFile);
+      } else if (ts.isJsxSelfClosingElement(node)) {
+        jsxTagName = node.tagName.getText(tempSourceFile);
+      }
+
+      // Only process JSX elements larger than the limit
+      if (code.length > jsxLimit) {
         replacements.push({
           start: scopeStart + nodeStart,
           end: scopeStart + nodeEnd,
           id,
           code,
+          jsxTagName,
         });
       }
     }
@@ -876,6 +1148,7 @@ function processJSXForScope(
         end: replacement.end,
         variables: [],
         childScopes: {},
+        jsxTagName: replacement.jsxTagName,
       };
 
       // Replace in text

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/mergeStatements.ts

@@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ export default function mergeStatements(statements: Statement[]) {
     return acc;
   }, {});
 
+  // Track variable reassignments: when a variable is reassigned (creating ::cyDuplicateKey::),
+  // subsequent references to that variable in VALUES should use the duplicate key.
+  // This ensures configData → fetcher.data.data uses the FIRST fetcher, while
+  // settingsData → fetcher.data.data uses fetcher::cyDuplicateKey1::.data.data
+  const activeRemappings: Record<string, string> = {};
+
   const equivalentVariables = statements.reduce((acc: any, result) => {
     for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(
       result.equivalentVariables ?? {},
@@ -196,16 +202,40 @@ export default function mergeStatements(statements: Statement[]) {
     for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(
       result.equivalentVariables ?? {},
     )) {
+      // Apply any active remappings to the VALUE, but ONLY for property paths
+      // e.g., if fetcher was remapped to fetcher::cyDuplicateKey1::,
+      // then "fetcher.data.data" should become "fetcher::cyDuplicateKey1::.data.data"
+      // However, we should NOT remap standalone variable references like "description"
+      // because that would lose type information from the original variable.
+      let remappedValue = value;
+      for (const [originalKey, remappedKey] of Object.entries(
+        activeRemappings,
+      )) {
+        // Only remap if the value is a property path (contains a dot after the key)
+        // This preserves type information for simple variable references
+        const keyRegex = new RegExp(
+          `^${originalKey.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&')}(?=\\.)`,
+        );
+        if (keyRegex.test(remappedValue)) {
+          remappedValue = remappedValue.replace(keyRegex, remappedKey);
+        }
+      }
+
       if (acc[key]) {
-        if (acc[key] === value) continue;
+        if (acc[key] === remappedValue) continue;
 
         let duplicateId = 1;
         while (acc[`${key}::cyDuplicateKey${duplicateId}::`]) {
           duplicateId++;
         }
-        acc[`${key}::cyDuplicateKey${duplicateId}::`] = value;
+        const duplicateKey = `${key}::cyDuplicateKey${duplicateId}::`;
+        acc[duplicateKey] = remappedValue;
+
+        // Track this remapping for subsequent statements
+        // Any future references to 'key' in VALUES should use duplicateKey instead
+        activeRemappings[key] = duplicateKey;
       } else {
-        acc[key] = value;
+        acc[key] = remappedValue;
       }
     }
     return acc;

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/promptGenerators/gatherAttributesMap.ts

@@ -198,6 +198,13 @@ export function gatherAttributesMap(
         const pathParts = splitOutsideParenthesesAndArrays(path);
         if (pathParts.length < 2) continue;
 
+        // Filter out paths that contain signature[N] anywhere
+        // These represent function input parameters, not data from data sources
+        // Key attributes must reference data sources, not function inputs
+        if (pathParts.some((part) => part.startsWith('signature['))) {
+          continue;
+        }
+
         if (mergedReturnValueSchema[path] === 'function') {
           continue;
         }

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/promptGenerators/generateChangesEntityScenarioDataGenerator.ts

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ ${incompleteResponse}
     {
       name: scenario.name,
       description: scenario.description,
-      keyAttributeInstructions: scenario.metadata.keyAttributeInstructions,
+      coveredFlows: scenario.metadata?.coveredFlows || [],
     },
     null,
     2,

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/promptGenerators/generateChangesEntityScenariosGenerator.ts

@@ -1,19 +1,11 @@
-import {
-  DataStructure,
-  Entity,
-  Scenario,
-  ReadonlyAnalysisMap,
-  Analysis,
-} from '~codeyam/types';
-import gatherRelevantDependentKeyAttributes from '../gatherRelevantDependentKeyAttributes';
+import { DataStructure, Entity, ExecutionFlow, Scenario } from '~codeyam/types';
 
 interface GenerateChangesEntityScenariosGeneratorArgs {
   entity: Pick<Entity, 'name' | 'code' | 'metadata'>;
   mergedDataStructure: Omit<DataStructure, 'equivalentSignatureVariables'>;
-  keyAttributes: Analysis['metadata']['keyAttributes'];
-  addedKeyAttributes: Analysis['metadata']['keyAttributes'];
-  removedKeyAttributes: Analysis['metadata']['keyAttributes'];
-  dependentAnalyses: ReadonlyAnalysisMap;
+  executionFlows?: ExecutionFlow[];
+  addedFlows?: ExecutionFlow[];
+  removedFlows?: ExecutionFlow[];
   existingScenarios: Scenario[];
   commitDiff: string;
   error: boolean;
@@ -22,62 +14,26 @@ interface GenerateChangesEntityScenariosGeneratorArgs {
 
 export default function generateChangesEntityScenariosGenerator({
   entity,
-  mergedDataStructure,
-  keyAttributes,
-  addedKeyAttributes,
-  removedKeyAttributes,
-  dependentAnalyses,
+  executionFlows,
+  addedFlows,
+  removedFlows,
   existingScenarios,
   commitDiff,
   error,
   changedDataStructureFields = [],
 }: GenerateChangesEntityScenariosGeneratorArgs) {
-  const relevantDependentKeyAttributesFlat =
-    gatherRelevantDependentKeyAttributes(
-      entity,
-      mergedDataStructure,
-      dependentAnalyses,
-    );
-
-  // Restructure flat array into nested format: { [filePath]: { [entityName]: KeyAttribute[] } }
-  const relevantDependentKeyAttributes: Record<
-    string,
-    Record<string, any[]>
-  > = {};
-  for (const attr of relevantDependentKeyAttributesFlat) {
-    const filePath = (attr as any).filePath;
-    const entityName = (attr as any).originalEntityName;
-
-    if (!filePath || !entityName) continue;
-
-    if (!relevantDependentKeyAttributes[filePath]) {
-      relevantDependentKeyAttributes[filePath] = {};
-    }
-    if (!relevantDependentKeyAttributes[filePath][entityName]) {
-      relevantDependentKeyAttributes[filePath][entityName] = [];
-    }
-    relevantDependentKeyAttributes[filePath][entityName].push(attr);
-  }
-
-  const formatKeyAttrs = (attrs: Analysis['metadata']['keyAttributes']) =>
-    attrs.map((ka) => ({
-      dataStructurePath: ka.dataStructurePath,
-      localVariable: ka.internalPath,
-      description: ka.description,
-      validValueOptions: ka.validValueOptions,
-      // Include new fields when present
-      ...(ka.valueType && { valueType: ka.valueType }),
-      ...(ka.dependencies && { dependencies: ka.dependencies }),
-    }));
-
   const addedSection =
-    addedKeyAttributes?.length > 0
-      ? JSON.stringify(formatKeyAttrs(addedKeyAttributes), null, 2)
+    addedFlows && addedFlows.length > 0
+      ? JSON.stringify(addedFlows, null, 2)
       : 'None';
 
   const removedSection =
-    removedKeyAttributes?.length > 0
-      ? JSON.stringify(removedKeyAttributes, null, 2)
+    removedFlows && removedFlows.length > 0
+      ? JSON.stringify(
+          removedFlows.map((f) => ({ id: f.id, name: f.name })),
+          null,
+          2,
+        )
       : 'None';
 
   const changedFieldsSection =
@@ -89,18 +45,18 @@ Fields that changed type, were added, or removed:
 ${JSON.stringify(changedDataStructureFields, null, 2)}
 \`\`\`
 
-**Update keyAttributeInstructions for affected scenarios** (e.g., if "stats.visualEntities" changed from array to number).
+**Update scenarios if their coveredFlows depend on these changed fields.**
 `
       : '';
 
   const existingScenariosJson = JSON.stringify(
     existingScenarios
-      .filter((s) => (error ? !!s.metadata.error : !s.metadata.error))
+      .filter((s) => (error ? !!s.metadata?.error : !s.metadata?.error))
       .map((s) => ({
         name: s.name,
         description: s.description,
-        keyAttributeInstructions: s.metadata.keyAttributeInstructions,
-        playwrightInstructions: s.metadata.playwrightInstructions,
+        coveredFlows: s.metadata?.coveredFlows || [],
+        playwrightInstructions: s.metadata?.playwrightInstructions,
       })),
     null,
     2,
@@ -114,55 +70,29 @@ ${commitDiff}
 \`\`\``
     : '';
 
-  const dependencySection =
-    !error &&
-    relevantDependentKeyAttributes &&
-    Object.keys(relevantDependentKeyAttributes).length > 0
-      ? `
-## Dependency Key Attributes
+  const executionFlowsSection =
+    executionFlows && executionFlows.length > 0
+      ? `## Current Execution Flows
+All distinct outcomes/behaviors this component can currently produce:
 \`\`\`json
-${JSON.stringify(
-  Object.keys(relevantDependentKeyAttributes).reduce((acc: any, path) => {
-    acc[path] = Object.keys(relevantDependentKeyAttributes[path]).reduce(
-      (entityAcc: any, entityName) => {
-        entityAcc[entityName] = relevantDependentKeyAttributes[path][
-          entityName
-        ].map((ka: any) => ({
-          dataStructurePath: ka.dataStructurePath,
-          localVariable: ka.path || ka.internalPath,
-          description: ka.description,
-          validValueOptions: ka.validValueOptions,
-          // Include new fields when present
-          ...(ka.valueType && { valueType: ka.valueType }),
-          ...(ka.dependencies && { dependencies: ka.dependencies }),
-        }));
-        return entityAcc;
-      },
-      {},
-    );
-    return acc;
-  }, {}),
-  null,
-  2,
-)}
-\`\`\``
+${JSON.stringify(executionFlows, null, 2)}
+\`\`\`
+`
       : '';
 
-  return `## Added Key Attributes
+  return `## Added Execution Flows
+New flows that need scenario coverage:
 \`\`\`json
 ${addedSection}
 \`\`\`
 
-## Removed Key Attributes
+## Removed Execution Flows
+Flows that no longer exist (remove from scenarios):
 \`\`\`json
 ${removedSection}
 \`\`\`
 ${changedFieldsSection}
-## Current Key Attributes
-\`\`\`json
-${JSON.stringify(formatKeyAttrs(keyAttributes), null, 2)}
-\`\`\`
-
+${executionFlowsSection}
 ## Existing Scenarios
 \`\`\`json
 ${existingScenariosJson}
@@ -172,5 +102,5 @@ ${diffSection}
 ## Current Code
 \`\`\`typescript
 ${entity.code}
-\`\`\`${dependencySection}`;
+\`\`\``;
 }

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/promptGenerators/generateChunkPrompt.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+import {
+  ExecutionFlow,
+  Scenario,
+  ScenariosDataStructure,
+} from '~codeyam/types';
+import simplifyKeysForLLM from './simplifyKeysForLLM';
+import noErrorAttributes from './noErrorAttributes';
+import { JsonTypeDefinition } from '~codeyam/types';
+
+type RequiredValue = NonNullable<ExecutionFlow['requiredValues']>[number];
+
+interface GenerateChunkPromptArgs {
+  scenario: Scenario;
+  chunk: ScenariosDataStructure['dataForMocks'];
+  chunkIndex: number;
+  totalChunks: number;
+  relevantRequiredValues: RequiredValue[];
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate a prompt for a focused LLM call to generate mock data for a single chunk.
+ *
+ * Large data structures overwhelm LLMs, causing them to make mistakes on some keys.
+ * By processing smaller chunks, each key gets more focused attention.
+ */
+export default function generateChunkPrompt({
+  scenario,
+  chunk,
+  chunkIndex,
+  totalChunks,
+  relevantRequiredValues,
+}: GenerateChunkPromptArgs): string {
+  // Clean up the schema for LLM consumption
+  const cleanedSchema = simplifyKeysForLLM(
+    noErrorAttributes(chunk) as JsonTypeDefinition,
+  );
+
+  const keysInChunk = Object.keys(chunk || {});
+
+  // Build requirements section if there are relevant requiredValues
+  const requirementsSection =
+    relevantRequiredValues.length > 0
+      ? `## Execution Flow Requirements for These Keys
+These specific values MUST be set to produce the correct scenario behavior:
+\`\`\`json
+${JSON.stringify(relevantRequiredValues, null, 2)}
+\`\`\`
+
+`
+      : '';
+
+  return `Generate mock data for chunk ${chunkIndex + 1} of ${totalChunks}.
+
+## Scenario
+\`\`\`json
+${JSON.stringify({ name: scenario.name, description: scenario.description }, null, 2)}
+\`\`\`
+
+${requirementsSection}## Keys in This Chunk (${keysInChunk.length} keys)
+Generate data for ONLY these keys:
+${keysInChunk.map((k) => `- \`${k}\``).join('\n')}
+
+## Schema for This Chunk
+\`\`\`json
+${JSON.stringify(cleanedSchema, null, 2)}
+\`\`\`
+
+## Instructions
+1. Match the EXACT structure shown in the schema
+2. Keys with special characters like \`*\` are LITERAL keys, not patterns
+3. If requiredValues are shown above, set values that satisfy them
+4. For paths like \`functionCall().functionCallReturnValue.property\`, the mock data key is just \`functionCall()\`
+
+Return ONLY a JSON object with this structure:
+\`\`\`json
+{
+  "mockData": {
+    // fill in ONLY the keys from this chunk
+  }
+}
+\`\`\``;
+}