@codemcp/workflows-core 5.2.2 → 5.2.4
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/resources/workflows/adr.yaml +62 -48
- package/resources/workflows/big-bang-conversion.yaml +231 -172
- package/resources/workflows/boundary-testing.yaml +137 -95
- package/resources/workflows/bugfix.yaml +33 -38
- package/resources/workflows/business-analysis.yaml +130 -172
- package/resources/workflows/c4-analysis.yaml +120 -114
- package/resources/workflows/epcc.yaml +43 -10
- package/resources/workflows/game-beginner.yaml +113 -103
- package/resources/workflows/greenfield.yaml +61 -38
- package/resources/workflows/minor.yaml +51 -28
- package/resources/workflows/posts.yaml +41 -42
- package/resources/workflows/sdd-bugfix-crowd.yaml +181 -206
- package/resources/workflows/sdd-bugfix.yaml +168 -179
- package/resources/workflows/sdd-feature-crowd.yaml +357 -380
- package/resources/workflows/sdd-feature.yaml +162 -155
- package/resources/workflows/sdd-greenfield-crowd.yaml +82 -74
- package/resources/workflows/sdd-greenfield.yaml +153 -147
- package/resources/workflows/slides.yaml +29 -35
- package/resources/workflows/tdd.yaml +59 -48
- package/resources/workflows/waterfall.yaml +64 -44
|
@@ -27,35 +27,33 @@ states:
|
|
|
27
27
|
reproduce:
|
|
28
28
|
description: 'Reproduce and understand the bug systematically'
|
|
29
29
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
**
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
**Output**: Clear, reliable reproduction case that can be used to verify the fix later.
|
|
30
|
+
**Systematically reproduce and understand the bug** to create a solid foundation for specification-driven fixing.
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
**STEP 1: Gather Comprehensive Information**
|
|
33
|
+
- Identify exact OS, browser/runtime versions, and hardware specs
|
|
34
|
+
- Document the precise sequence of actions that trigger the bug
|
|
35
|
+
- Collect error messages, logs, or stack traces
|
|
36
|
+
- Determine if bug occurs consistently or intermittently
|
|
37
|
+
- Assess how many users are affected and the business impact
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**STEP 2: Create Reproduction Cases**
|
|
40
|
+
- Develop minimal, reliable reproduction steps
|
|
41
|
+
- Document the exact environment and conditions
|
|
42
|
+
- Create test data or scenarios that trigger the issue
|
|
43
|
+
- Verify the bug occurs consistently
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
**STEP 3: Understand the Problem**
|
|
46
|
+
- Clarify current (buggy) behavior
|
|
47
|
+
- Specify correct behavior that should occur
|
|
48
|
+
- Distinguish symptoms from root cause
|
|
49
|
+
- Identify related issues or edge cases
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
**STEP 4: Document Findings**
|
|
52
|
+
- Create `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/reproduction.md` with detailed reproduction steps
|
|
53
|
+
- Include error logs, screenshots, or other evidence
|
|
54
|
+
- Document the gap between expected and actual behavior
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
**Output**: Clear, reliable reproduction case to verify the fix later.
|
|
59
57
|
|
|
60
58
|
transitions:
|
|
61
59
|
- trigger: 'bug_reproduced'
|
|
@@ -65,35 +63,34 @@ states:
|
|
|
65
63
|
- trigger: 'bug_not_reproducible'
|
|
66
64
|
to: 'reproduce'
|
|
67
65
|
instructions: >
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
66
|
+
Gather more details about the environment, conditions, or steps that might be missing from the current information.
|
|
67
|
+
Contact the reporter for additional information if needed.
|
|
70
68
|
transition_reason: 'Bug could not be reproduced, need more information'
|
|
71
69
|
|
|
72
70
|
specify:
|
|
73
71
|
description: 'Create specification of correct behavior'
|
|
74
72
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
**
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
Create `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/bug-spec.md` using the template provided below.
|
|
73
|
+
**Create a clear specification of the correct behavior** to guide the fix and prevent regressions.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
**STEP 1: Define Correct Behavior**
|
|
76
|
+
- Describe what should happen in the scenario that currently fails
|
|
77
|
+
- Specify expected outcomes for users
|
|
78
|
+
- Clarify system behavior in edge cases
|
|
79
|
+
- Document business rules that should be enforced
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
**STEP 2: Handle Ambiguities**
|
|
82
|
+
- Make informed decisions about unclear requirements
|
|
83
|
+
- Use `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION: question]` only for critical ambiguities (max 3)
|
|
84
|
+
- Prioritize: correctness > user experience > technical details
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
**STEP 3: Ensure Quality Standards**
|
|
87
|
+
- Focus on user impact and business value
|
|
88
|
+
- Avoid implementation details
|
|
89
|
+
- Ensure all requirements are testable
|
|
90
|
+
- Make success criteria measurable
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
**STEP 4: Document Specification**
|
|
93
|
+
- Create `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/bug-spec.md` using the template provided below
|
|
97
94
|
additional_instructions: |
|
|
98
95
|
**Bug Specification Template:**
|
|
99
96
|
|
|
@@ -185,41 +182,39 @@ states:
|
|
|
185
182
|
- trigger: 'needs_clarification'
|
|
186
183
|
to: 'specify'
|
|
187
184
|
instructions: >
|
|
188
|
-
|
|
189
|
-
|
|
185
|
+
Present structured questions to stakeholders about unresolved clarifications in the bug specification.
|
|
186
|
+
Wait for their responses, then update the specification accordingly.
|
|
190
187
|
transition_reason: 'Bug specification needs clarification before proceeding'
|
|
191
188
|
|
|
192
189
|
test:
|
|
193
190
|
description: 'Create comprehensive tests that capture the bug and expected behavior'
|
|
194
191
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
195
|
-
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
**Test Creation Process:**
|
|
192
|
+
**Create comprehensive tests** that capture both the current bug and the expected correct behavior to guide the fix and prevent regressions.
|
|
198
193
|
|
|
199
|
-
1
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
|
|
194
|
+
**STEP 1: Create Failing Tests for Current Bug**
|
|
195
|
+
- Write tests that demonstrate the current buggy behavior
|
|
196
|
+
- These tests should fail initially (Red phase of TDD)
|
|
197
|
+
- Cover the main reproduction case and related scenarios
|
|
198
|
+
- Include edge cases and boundary conditions
|
|
204
199
|
|
|
205
|
-
2
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
|
|
200
|
+
**STEP 2: Create Tests for Expected Behavior**
|
|
201
|
+
- Write tests that specify the correct behavior from `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/bug-spec.md`
|
|
202
|
+
- These tests should pass once the bug is fixed
|
|
203
|
+
- Cover all functional requirements from the specification
|
|
204
|
+
- Include user scenarios and success criteria
|
|
210
205
|
|
|
211
|
-
3
|
|
212
|
-
|
|
213
|
-
|
|
214
|
-
|
|
206
|
+
**STEP 3: Create Regression Tests**
|
|
207
|
+
- Write tests for related functionality that should not be affected
|
|
208
|
+
- Ensure the fix doesn't break existing features
|
|
209
|
+
- Test integration points and dependencies
|
|
215
210
|
|
|
216
|
-
4
|
|
217
|
-
|
|
218
|
-
|
|
219
|
-
|
|
220
|
-
|
|
211
|
+
**STEP 4: Organize Test Suite**
|
|
212
|
+
- Group tests by functionality and user scenarios
|
|
213
|
+
- Use clear, descriptive test names
|
|
214
|
+
- Include both unit and integration tests as appropriate
|
|
215
|
+
- Document test setup and data requirements
|
|
221
216
|
|
|
222
|
-
**Output**:
|
|
217
|
+
**Output**: Comprehensive test suite in appropriate test files to guide the fix implementation.
|
|
223
218
|
|
|
224
219
|
transitions:
|
|
225
220
|
- trigger: 'tests_created'
|
|
@@ -229,39 +224,37 @@ states:
|
|
|
229
224
|
plan:
|
|
230
225
|
description: 'Plan the fix approach with constitutional compliance'
|
|
231
226
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
232
|
-
|
|
233
|
-
|
|
234
|
-
**
|
|
235
|
-
|
|
236
|
-
|
|
237
|
-
|
|
238
|
-
|
|
239
|
-
|
|
240
|
-
|
|
241
|
-
|
|
242
|
-
|
|
243
|
-
|
|
244
|
-
|
|
245
|
-
|
|
246
|
-
|
|
247
|
-
|
|
248
|
-
|
|
249
|
-
|
|
250
|
-
|
|
251
|
-
|
|
252
|
-
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
254
|
-
|
|
255
|
-
|
|
256
|
-
|
|
257
|
-
|
|
258
|
-
|
|
259
|
-
|
|
260
|
-
|
|
261
|
-
|
|
262
|
-
|
|
263
|
-
- Plan testing and validation approach
|
|
264
|
-
- Consider rollout and deployment strategy
|
|
227
|
+
**Plan the fix approach** to ensure the solution aligns with system architecture and quality principles.
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
**STEP 1: Load Context**
|
|
230
|
+
- Read bug specification from `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/bug-spec.md`
|
|
231
|
+
- Review reproduction case from `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/reproduction.md`
|
|
232
|
+
- Understand the test requirements
|
|
233
|
+
- Analyze existing codebase and architecture
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
**STEP 2: Perform Root Cause Analysis**
|
|
236
|
+
- Identify the underlying cause of the bug
|
|
237
|
+
- Understand why the current implementation fails
|
|
238
|
+
- Map the problem to specific code areas or logic flaws
|
|
239
|
+
- Consider systemic issues vs. isolated bugs
|
|
240
|
+
|
|
241
|
+
**STEP 3: Design Fix Strategy**
|
|
242
|
+
- Design minimal, targeted fix that addresses root cause
|
|
243
|
+
- Ensure fix aligns with existing architectural patterns
|
|
244
|
+
- Consider impact on related functionality
|
|
245
|
+
- Plan for backward compatibility if needed
|
|
246
|
+
|
|
247
|
+
**STEP 4: Verify Constitutional/Quality Compliance**
|
|
248
|
+
- Ensure fix follows system design principles
|
|
249
|
+
- Verify approach maintains code quality standards
|
|
250
|
+
- Check that fix doesn't introduce technical debt
|
|
251
|
+
- Validate solution is maintainable and testable
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
**STEP 5: Create Implementation Plan**
|
|
254
|
+
- Break down fix into specific, actionable tasks
|
|
255
|
+
- Identify files and components that need changes
|
|
256
|
+
- Plan testing and validation approach
|
|
257
|
+
- Consider rollout and deployment strategy
|
|
265
258
|
|
|
266
259
|
**Output**: Create `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/fix-plan.md` with detailed approach for implementing the bug fix.
|
|
267
260
|
|
|
@@ -273,40 +266,39 @@ states:
|
|
|
273
266
|
- trigger: 'architectural_conflict'
|
|
274
267
|
to: 'plan'
|
|
275
268
|
instructions: >
|
|
276
|
-
|
|
277
|
-
|
|
269
|
+
Revise the approach to address conflicts with system architecture or quality principles.
|
|
270
|
+
Ensure proper integration and maintainability of the planned fix.
|
|
278
271
|
transition_reason: 'Fix plan conflicts with architecture, needs revision'
|
|
279
272
|
|
|
280
273
|
fix:
|
|
281
274
|
description: 'Implement the minimal fix to make tests pass'
|
|
282
275
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
283
|
-
|
|
284
|
-
|
|
285
|
-
**Fix
|
|
286
|
-
|
|
287
|
-
|
|
288
|
-
|
|
289
|
-
|
|
290
|
-
|
|
291
|
-
|
|
292
|
-
|
|
293
|
-
|
|
294
|
-
|
|
295
|
-
|
|
296
|
-
|
|
297
|
-
|
|
298
|
-
|
|
299
|
-
|
|
300
|
-
|
|
301
|
-
|
|
302
|
-
|
|
303
|
-
|
|
304
|
-
|
|
305
|
-
|
|
306
|
-
|
|
307
|
-
|
|
308
|
-
|
|
309
|
-
**Progress Tracking**:
|
|
276
|
+
**Implement the bug fix** following the plan and making the tests pass with minimal, targeted changes.
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
**STEP 1: Execute Fix Strategy**
|
|
279
|
+
- Follow the fix strategy from `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/fix-plan.md`
|
|
280
|
+
- Make targeted changes to address the root cause
|
|
281
|
+
- Avoid over-engineering or unnecessary modifications
|
|
282
|
+
- Keep changes minimal and focused
|
|
283
|
+
|
|
284
|
+
**STEP 2: Apply Test-Driven Implementation**
|
|
285
|
+
- Run the failing tests to confirm they capture the bug
|
|
286
|
+
- Implement changes to make the tests pass (Green phase)
|
|
287
|
+
- Ensure all new tests pass while maintaining existing functionality
|
|
288
|
+
|
|
289
|
+
**STEP 3: Maintain Quality Standards**
|
|
290
|
+
- Follow existing code patterns and conventions
|
|
291
|
+
- Maintain or improve code readability
|
|
292
|
+
- Add appropriate error handling
|
|
293
|
+
- Include necessary logging or monitoring
|
|
294
|
+
|
|
295
|
+
**STEP 4: Validate Implementation**
|
|
296
|
+
- Verify the original reproduction case no longer occurs
|
|
297
|
+
- Run full test suite to check for regressions
|
|
298
|
+
- Test edge cases and boundary conditions
|
|
299
|
+
- Validate fix meets success criteria from specification
|
|
300
|
+
|
|
301
|
+
**STEP 5: Track Progress**
|
|
310
302
|
- Document any deviations from the original plan
|
|
311
303
|
- Note any additional issues discovered during implementation
|
|
312
304
|
- Update tests if new edge cases are found
|
|
@@ -319,49 +311,47 @@ states:
|
|
|
319
311
|
- trigger: 'fix_blocked'
|
|
320
312
|
to: 'plan'
|
|
321
313
|
instructions: >
|
|
322
|
-
Fix implementation is blocked by technical issues or complexity.
|
|
323
314
|
Return to planning to revise the approach or break down the problem further.
|
|
315
|
+
Fix implementation is blocked by technical issues or complexity that need to be resolved.
|
|
324
316
|
transition_reason: 'Fix implementation blocked, need to revise plan'
|
|
325
317
|
|
|
326
318
|
- trigger: 'tests_failing'
|
|
327
319
|
to: 'test'
|
|
328
320
|
instructions: >
|
|
329
|
-
Tests are failing in unexpected ways, indicating the test design may need revision.
|
|
330
321
|
Review and update the test suite to better capture the requirements.
|
|
322
|
+
Tests are failing in unexpected ways, indicating the test design may need revision.
|
|
331
323
|
transition_reason: 'Tests failing unexpectedly, need to revise test approach'
|
|
332
324
|
|
|
333
325
|
verify:
|
|
334
326
|
description: 'Verify the fix works and does not introduce regressions'
|
|
335
327
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
336
|
-
|
|
337
|
-
|
|
338
|
-
**
|
|
339
|
-
|
|
340
|
-
|
|
341
|
-
|
|
342
|
-
|
|
343
|
-
|
|
344
|
-
|
|
345
|
-
|
|
346
|
-
|
|
347
|
-
|
|
348
|
-
|
|
349
|
-
|
|
350
|
-
|
|
351
|
-
|
|
352
|
-
|
|
353
|
-
|
|
354
|
-
|
|
355
|
-
|
|
356
|
-
|
|
357
|
-
|
|
358
|
-
|
|
359
|
-
|
|
360
|
-
|
|
361
|
-
|
|
362
|
-
|
|
363
|
-
|
|
364
|
-
**Final Validation**:
|
|
328
|
+
**Verify the bug fix** works correctly and doesn't introduce any regressions or new issues.
|
|
329
|
+
|
|
330
|
+
**STEP 1: Verify Bug Resolution**
|
|
331
|
+
- Confirm the original reproduction case no longer occurs
|
|
332
|
+
- Verify all scenarios from `$VIBE_DIR/specs/$BRANCH_NAME/bug-spec.md` work correctly
|
|
333
|
+
- Test the fix in the original environment where the bug was reported
|
|
334
|
+
- Validate that success criteria are met
|
|
335
|
+
|
|
336
|
+
**STEP 2: Perform Regression Testing**
|
|
337
|
+
- Run full test suite to ensure no existing functionality is broken
|
|
338
|
+
- Test related features and integration points
|
|
339
|
+
- Verify performance hasn't degraded
|
|
340
|
+
- Check that the fix doesn't introduce new edge case failures
|
|
341
|
+
|
|
342
|
+
**STEP 3: Validate User Acceptance**
|
|
343
|
+
- Test from user perspective using real scenarios
|
|
344
|
+
- Verify the fix addresses the original user problem
|
|
345
|
+
- Ensure user experience is improved, not just technically correct
|
|
346
|
+
- Consider having original bug reporter validate the fix
|
|
347
|
+
|
|
348
|
+
**STEP 4: Update Documentation**
|
|
349
|
+
- Update relevant documentation if behavior has changed
|
|
350
|
+
- Document the fix approach for future reference
|
|
351
|
+
- Prepare release notes or change log entries
|
|
352
|
+
- Consider if this fix reveals systemic issues to address
|
|
353
|
+
|
|
354
|
+
**Final Validation Checklist**:
|
|
365
355
|
- All tests pass (both new and existing)
|
|
366
356
|
- Original bug reproduction case fails (bug is fixed)
|
|
367
357
|
- No regressions detected
|
|
@@ -371,22 +361,22 @@ states:
|
|
|
371
361
|
- trigger: 'verification_complete'
|
|
372
362
|
to: 'verify'
|
|
373
363
|
instructions: >
|
|
374
|
-
|
|
375
|
-
|
|
364
|
+
The bug has been resolved, all tests pass, and no regressions have been detected.
|
|
365
|
+
The fix is ready for deployment.
|
|
376
366
|
transition_reason: 'Verification complete, bug fix ready for deployment'
|
|
377
367
|
|
|
378
368
|
- trigger: 'regression_detected'
|
|
379
369
|
to: 'fix'
|
|
380
370
|
instructions: >
|
|
381
|
-
|
|
382
|
-
|
|
371
|
+
Return to implementation to address the problems.
|
|
372
|
+
The fix has introduced new issues or broken existing functionality.
|
|
383
373
|
transition_reason: 'Regression detected, need to revise fix implementation'
|
|
384
374
|
|
|
385
375
|
- trigger: 'fix_insufficient'
|
|
386
376
|
to: 'specify'
|
|
387
377
|
instructions: >
|
|
388
|
-
|
|
389
|
-
|
|
378
|
+
Return to specification to better define the requirements.
|
|
379
|
+
The fix doesn't fully address the original problem or reveals incomplete specification.
|
|
390
380
|
transition_reason: 'Fix insufficient, need to revise specification'
|
|
391
381
|
|
|
392
382
|
# Global transitions available from any state
|
|
@@ -394,6 +384,5 @@ global_transitions:
|
|
|
394
384
|
- trigger: 'abandon_bugfix'
|
|
395
385
|
to: 'reproduce'
|
|
396
386
|
instructions: >
|
|
397
|
-
|
|
398
|
-
and understanding the bug.
|
|
387
|
+
If you want to restart, you'll begin again with reproducing and understanding the bug.
|
|
399
388
|
transition_reason: 'Bug fix abandoned, restart from beginning'
|